Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:2559-2566
doi: 10.1161/hs1101.098524
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grau, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diener, H.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grau, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diener, H.-C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke

(Stroke. 2001;32:2559.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Risk Factors, Outcome, and Treatment in Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke

The German Stroke Data Bank

Armin J. Grau, MD; Christian Weimar, MD; Florian Buggle, MD; Alexander Heinrich, MD; Michael Goertler, MD; Stefan Neumaier, MD; Joerg Glahn, MD; Tobias Brandt, MD; Werner Hacke, MD; Hans-Christoph Diener, MD on behalf of the German Stroke Data Bank Collaborators

From the Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg (A.J.G., F.B., T.B., W.H.), Heidelberg; the Department of Neurology, University of Essen (C.W., H.-C.D.), Essen; the Department of Neurology, University of Greifswald (A.H.), Greifswald; the Department of Neurology, University of Magdeburg (M.G.), Magdeburg; the Department of Neurology, University of Homburg (S.N.), Homburg; and the Department of Neurology, Klinikum Minden (J.G.), Minden, Germany.

Correspondence to Armin J. Grau, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail armin_grau{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Data on risk factors for etiologic subtypes of ischemic stroke are still scant. The aim of this study was to characterize stroke subtypes regarding risk factor profile, outcome, and current treatment strategies.

Methods— We analyzed data from 5017 patients with acute ischemic stroke (42.4% women, aged 65.9±14.1 years) who were enrolled in a large multicenter hospital–based stroke data bank. Standardized data assessment and stroke subtype classification were used by all centers.

Results— Sex and age distribution, major risk factors and comorbidities, recurrent stroke, treatment strategies, and outcome were all unevenly distributed among stroke subtypes (P<0.001, respectively). Cardioembolism, the most frequent etiology of stroke (25.6%), was particularly common in the elderly (those aged >70 years) and associated with an adverse outcome, a low rate of early stroke recurrence, and frequent use of thrombolytic therapy and intravenous anticoagulation. Large-artery atherosclerosis (20.9%), the most common cause of stroke in middle-aged patients (those aged 45 to 70 years), showed the highest male preponderance, highest rate of early stroke recurrence, and highest prevalence of previous transient ischemic attack, current smoking, and daily alcohol consumption among all subtypes. The highest prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity was found in small-vessel disease (20.5%), which, in turn, was associated with the lowest stroke severity and mortality.

Conclusions— Our results foster the concept of ischemic stroke as a polyetiologic disease with marked differences between subtypes regarding risk factors and outcome. Therefore, studies involving risk factors of ischemic stroke should differentiate between etiologic stroke subtypes.


Key Words: outcome • risk factors • stroke classification • stroke, ischemic


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences
 
It is unanimously accepted that different diseases can cause ischemic stroke. The most important etiologies of ischemic stroke include large-artery atherosclerosis (macroangiopathy), cardioembolism, and cerebral small-vessel disease (microangiopathy). Less common causes of stroke are cervical artery dissection, cerebral vasculitis, coagulopathies, hematologic disorders, and others. A considerable minority of ischemic stroke cases remains etiologically undefined even after complete diagnostic workup. It is presently an important challenge to tailor acute therapy and secondary prevention according to the cause of stroke in individual patients. However, there is still scant information on the role of risk factors and the clinical course in etiologic stroke subtypes.1,2

The Stroke Data Bank of the German Stroke Foundation (Stiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe) is a multicenter hospital–based stroke registry that was initiated in 1997 to obtain data on stroke etiology, management, and outcome, as well as on the quality of clinical stroke care in Germany. It was one of the prespecified aims of this data bank to collect a patient sample that would be large enough to allow for proper characterization of different stroke subtypes regarding associated risk factors and comorbidities, stroke severity, mortality, clinical complications, early stroke recurrence, and current treatment strategies.

Based on previous studies and observations during the treatment of stroke patients, the following hypotheses were developed that guided the data analysis in the present study: (1) Stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis and stroke due to small-vessel disease show the highest prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. (2) Macroangiopathic stroke is characterized by a strong prevalence of current smoking, coronary heart disease, and peripheral arterial disease. (3) Cardioembolic stroke is associated with the highest stroke severity and stroke due to small-vessel disease with the lowest stroke severity. (4) The diagnosis of different stroke etiologies guides decisions regarding early- and long-term secondary prevention in current practice.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences
 
Twenty-three neurology departments from all geographic parts of Germany participated in data acquisition for the German Stroke Data Bank, which took part between January 1998 and December 1999. All hospitals are equipped with an acute-stroke unit and, in most cases, also with a neurological intensive care unit. They serve catchment areas of 100 000 to 1 million inhabitants and are the main care providers for stroke patients in these regions. Almost all stroke patients with acute stroke in these centers received a cranial CT or MRI, extracranial and transcranial Doppler sonography and/or an angiographic evaluation of brain-supplying arteries (including CT or magnetic resonance angiography), an ECG and/or ECG monitoring, basic blood tests, and additional laboratory investigations as required. The majority of patients were examined by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. The protocol of the Stroke Registry was approved by the responsible Institutional Review Boards. All patients gave informed consent if their personal data (name, address, and telephone number) were to be transferred to the data management center. If no informed consent could be obtained from the patient, only the anonymous medical data were transferred to the data management center.

Prospective data collection was performed by using a standardized questionnaire based on an extensive manual. It included age, sex, time of ischemia and admission to hospital, vascular risk factors and prior diseases, previous medication, results from technical examinations (eg, Doppler ultrasound), infarct localization, acute-stroke therapy, complications, medication for secondary prevention, and severity of the clinical deficit; the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIH-SS), the Barthel index, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used at admission and discharge. Assessment of the NIH-SS was based on video training. Information on risk factors, previous diseases, and medication was primarily obtained from the patient, and additional information was collected from relatives and general practitioners. The definitions of risk factors follow.

Risk Factors
Arterial Hypertension
Arterial hypertension was defined as history of elevated blood pressure >160/90 mm Hg at 2 independent readings before stroke or on antihypertensive medication.

Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes mellitus was defined as history of elevated blood glucose at 2 independent readings before stroke or elevated hemoglobin A1c at admission or on antidiabetic medication.

Hypercholesterolemia
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as history of elevated total cholesterol >220 mg/dL at 2 independent readings before stroke or lipid-lowering medication.

Complications were assessed until the day of discharge from the documenting hospital, but for this analysis, only such complications that occurred within the first week after admission were considered.

Follow-up evaluations after 3 months assessed recurrent stroke and functional dependency by Barthel index and mRS. If the patient did not consent in submission of his personal data, the participating center performed the follow-up interview at site. Otherwise, the follow-up was performed by trained telephone interviewers at the University of Essen or the Stiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe. If a patient could not be reached by telephone or via his general practitioner, a follow-up letter was sent. If still no information on the patient’s outcome could be obtained, a query at the citizen registry was made to check for current address or death.

The data bank included patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and all types of acute stroke admitted within 7 days after the event. In this analysis, only patients with ischemic stroke, defined as a clinical deficit lasting >24 hours, were included. Patients with TIA or cerebral hemorrhage were excluded. For assessment of etiologic stroke subtypes, we used the classification of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) investigators.3 We included, as a slight modification, an additional category for patients with >=2 possible etiologies (concurrent etiology, see below). The diagnoses are based on clinical features and ancillary tests, such as brain imaging, Doppler ultrasound studies, cardiological examinations, and laboratory investigations. The classification in the present study was performed by the local neurologists after completion of ancillary studies and was based on the criteria that follow.

Stroke Criteria
Macroangiopathy (Large-Artery Atherosclerosis)
Macroangiopathy is defined as the presence of an occlusion or a stenosis with >=50% diameter reduction of a brain-supplying artery corresponding to clinical symptoms and with location and morphology typical of atherosclerosis on Doppler ultrasound or angiography. Diagnostic studies had to exclude potential sources of cardiogenic embolism.

Cardioembolism
Cardioembolism is defined as the presence of a high- or medium-risk source of cardiac embolism.3 Potential large-artery atherosclerotic sources of thrombosis or embolism had to be absent.

Microangiopathy (Small-Vessel Disease)
Microangiopathy is defined as the presence of one of the traditional lacunar syndromes (eg, pure motor stroke, pure sensory stroke, sensorimotor stroke, ataxic hemiparesis, and dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome), infarction(s) <1.5 cm of diameter or normal CT/MRI examination, and absence of acute cerebral cortical dysfunction. Potential cardiac sources for embolism should be absent, and evaluation of the large extracranial arteries should not demonstrate a stenosis of >50% in an ipsilateral artery.

Other Determined Etiologies
The questionnaire specifically mentioned spontaneous dissection, traumatic dissection, vasculitis, hematologic disorders, coagulopathies, or other not-further-specified diseases. These diagnoses had to be revealed by diagnostic studies, such as angiography or blood tests. Cardiac sources of embolism and large-artery atherosclerosis had to be excluded by other studies.

Undetermined Etiology
This category included patients in whom a likely etiology could not be determined despite an extensive evaluation or in whom the treating physician felt that not all necessary investigations had been performed.

Concurrent Etiology
This category was included as an independent entity for the frequent situation in which a patient had >=2 probable stroke etiologies, and it could not be determined which of them was causative.

In the present analysis, we only included patients from those centers who registered >75% (range 76% to 98%) of all acute-stroke patients hospitalized during the period in which the respective center participated. Thus, we included data from 14 centers who participated for 10 to 24 months during the biannual registration period and registered a total of 5105 patients with acute ischemic stroke. The centers, 8 university hospitals and 6 municipal and local hospitals, are situated in North (Bielefeld, Minden, and Rostock), East (Leipzig, Berlin, Magdeburg, and Jena), West (Essen, Frechen, and Hamburg), and South (Stuttgart, Ulm, München-Harlaching, and Salzhausen) Germany. Of these centers, 6 centers with a registration rate >=95% and a total of 2797 patients were compared with the other centers with a lower registration rate to test for a potential selection bias.

Data Evaluation and Statistics
After a final consistency check with the source data at the site, questionnaires were sent to the data management centers at the University of Essen and the German Stroke Foundation. They were rechecked by 2 physicians for completeness and plausibility and were entered in duplicate into the database by trained personnel. Missing or implausible data (in particular, contradictions between clinical and ancillary test results and subtype classification) were referred to the treating clinician. Data quality was furthermore ensured by monthly reports and clinical site visits. The final decisions of the local centers on subtype diagnosis were accepted, and patients were not excluded from our analyses for possible misclassification. Missing data were not considered in the analyses. Twenty-six patients had to be excluded because of missing information on stroke subtypes, and 62 patients were excluded because they had no documented cerebral imaging. Thus, 5017 patients were finally included in the present study.

Continuous variables are presented as mean±SD or as median and first and third quartile and were compared by ANOVA between groups of stroke subtypes. Categorical variables are presented as percentages. Comparisons of categorical variables between all subtypes were performed with the {chi}2 test according to Pearson with 5 df. Therefore, significance levels refer to differences between all groups. Separate comparisons between single groups were limited to those etiologic subgroups and parameters for which separate hypotheses had been formulated to avoid multiple testing. We used binary logistic regression analysis with forward selection and adjustment for age (as a linear variable) and sex to test for significant differences in risk factor distribution and treatment strategies between stroke subtypes with macroangiopathy as the reference category. Statistical analyses were performed by using the program package SPSS version 9.0.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences
 
A total of 5017 patients with ischemic stroke, 2127 women and 2890 men aged 65.9±14.1 (mean±SD) years, were included in the present study. Cardioembolism was the most common cause of stroke (n=1286, 25.6%), followed by large-artery atherosclerosis (n=1047, 20.9%) and microangiopathy (n=1028, 20.5%) (Table 1). Patients with stroke from large-artery atherosclerosis had territorial (n=936) or extraterritorial infarcts of presumed hemodynamic origin (n=111). Combined other etiologies (n=175, 3.5%) involved patients with spontaneous (n=68, 1.3%) or traumatic (n=12, 0.2%) cervical artery dissection, vasculitis (n=13, 0.3%), coagulation disorders (n=35, 0.7%), other hematologic diseases (n=10, 0.2%), or nonspecified etiologies (n=37, 0.7%). In 1137 patients (22.7%), the etiology remained undefined because of incomplete investigations (n=255, 5.1%) or despite complete workup (n=882, 17.5%), and in 344 patients (6.9%), >1 potential cause of stroke could be found.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic Data in Etiologic Subgroups of Ischemic Stroke

The diagnosis of etiologic subgroups was based on frequently used ancillary tests. All patients received cerebral imaging, either cranial CT scan (4859 patients, 96.9%) or cranial MRI (1460 patients, 29.1%); 4177 patients (83.3%) were examined by extracranial Doppler sonography; 3846 (76.7%), by duplex sonography; 4517 (90.0%), by transcranial Doppler; 1022 (20.4%), by CT, magnetic resonance, or digital subtraction angiography; and 3170 (63.2%), by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography.

Risk Factors
Sex distribution differed significantly between etiologic subtypes; the highest male preponderance was in the macroangiopathic stroke category (66.2%), and the lowest proportion of men was in the cardioembolic stroke category (49.9%). Cardioembolism, concurrent etiologies, and microangiopathy were associated with the highest mean age, and combined other etiologies were associated with the lowest mean age. The relative contribution of various etiologies differed among age strata. Combined other etiologies clearly dominated among young patients (aged <45 years), macroangiopathy was the most common cause in the middle-age stratum (aged 45 to 70 years), and cardioembolism was the most common cause among the elderly (aged >70 years) (Table 1).

The prevalence of modifiable risk factors and associated diseases was significantly different among various stroke subgroups (Table 2). A history of previous stroke was most common in patients with concurrent etiologies (29.1%), least frequently encountered in patients with combined other etiologies (10.5%), and of similar prevalence in patients with macroangiopathy (22.8%), cardioembolism (22.3%), and microangiopathy (25.1%). In contrast, a history of previous TIA was most prevalent in large-artery atherosclerosis (20.0%) and least frequent in cardioembolism (8.1%). Arterial hypertension was highly prevalent in all groups except combined other etiologies (35.1%). Despite a generally high level, hypertension was significantly more common in microangiopathy (79.4%) than in macroangiopathy (70.0%, P<0.001) and also more common in macroangiopathic than in cardioembolic stroke (62.5%, P<0.001). Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in microangiopathy (35.5%) than in stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis (29.0%, P=0.002) or cardioembolism (28.1%, P<0.001) and relatively uncommon in patients with combined other etiologies (9.4%). Hypercholesterolemia was particularly common in both microangiopathic stroke (44.0%) and macroangiopathic stroke (41.4%) and least frequent in cardioembolism (27.8%) and combined other etiologies (21.9%). Patients with stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis most often affirmed current smoking (37.6%) and smoked more often than did patients with microangiopathy (25.9%, P<0.001). Current smoking was also common in combined other stroke etiologies (34.7%) but infrequent in cardioembolism (17.6%) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Risk Factors in Patients With Various Etiologies of Ischemic Stroke

Patients with large-artery atherosclerosis most often reported daily alcohol consumption (14.7%) and least often reported complete alcohol abstinence (40.6%), whereas a reverse pattern was found in patients with cardioembolism. A normal body mass index (<25) was most often present in patients with combined other etiologies (50.3%) and least frequent in patients with cerebral microangiopathy (36.5%). Instead, stroke due to microangiopathy was most often associated with severe obesity (body mass index >30, 17.7%). Coronary heart disease was particularly prevalent in patients with concurrent etiologies (36.4%), whereas the rate was similar in macroangiopathic (23.3%), cardioembolic (29.5%), and microangiopathic (21.5%) stroke. Patients with concurrent etiologies (12.4%) and those with large-artery atherosclerosis (10.3%) most often had a concomitant diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease.

Stroke Severity, Complications, Mortality, and Treatment Strategies
The neurological deficit on admission was most severe in cardioembolism, least pronounced in microangiopathic stroke, and of medium severity and similar distribution in the other etiologies. Within the first week, recurrent cerebral ischemic events occurred in 216 (4.3%) patients. Recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA was most common in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (8.1%) and also occurred frequently in patients with concurrent etiologies (5.2%) and least often in patients with cardioembolic stroke (2.8%). Secondary parenchymal hemorrhage was most prevalent in stroke of unknown origin (2.6%) and in cardioembolic stroke (2.7%). A similar proportion of patients with concurrent etiologies, cardioembolism, and large-artery atherosclerosis required treatment for severe hypertension (>200/110 mm Hg). Epileptic seizures were uncommon in all subgroups and least common in microangiopathic stroke (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Stroke Severity, Length of Hospitalization, Complications, and Outcome in Stroke Subtypes

Mortality within 90 days amounted to 14.7% of all patients with available follow-up assessment (n=3529, 70.3% of all patients). Mortality was highest in cardioembolic stroke (22.6%) and lowest in microangiopathy (3.3%) and combined other etiologies (9.3%). Similarly, good outcome (mRS 0 to 2) was most frequently reached by patients with microangiopathic stroke and stroke due to other etiologies, whereas a poor outcome (mRS 4 to 5) was most common in patients with cardioembolism, followed by those with macroangiopathy and concurrent mechanisms (Table 3).

Almost the same proportions of patients with cardioembolic stroke (31.1%), macroangiopathic stroke (29.3%), and microangiopathic stroke (29.0%) and a slightly higher proportion of patients with concurrent etiologies (36.0%) had been treated with aspirin before ictus. Previous anticoagulation was particularly common in patients with cardioembolism (8.0%) and in those with >1 probable etiology (7.0%). Systemic thrombolysis was most often used in cardioembolic stroke (6.5%) and only rarely in patients with a final diagnosis of microangiopathy. Intravenous anticoagulation with heparin was most frequently administered in patients with combined other etiologies (36.0%) and in patients with cardioembolism (55.7%) but only rarely in microangiopathy (18.8%). Similarly, oral anticoagulants for long-term secondary prevention were most often administered in patients with combined other etiologies (50.6%) and in patients with cardioembolism (44.8%). In contrast, almost all patients with microangiopathy (96.2%) and the vast majority of patients with macroangiopathic stroke (73.7%) were treated with platelet inhibitors for secondary prevention (Table 4). A separate analysis including only the 6 centers with >=95% registration completeness did not show any relevant differences regarding stroke subtypes, age, sex, risk factors, previous treatment, and stroke severity among subtypes compared with the above analyses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Treatment, Neurological Deficit, and Complications in Stroke Subtypes


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences
 
The present study from a large multicenter hospital–based stroke data bank investigates the distribution of risk factors, in-hospital complications, outcome, and treatment strategies in different subtypes of ischemic stroke. Despite including patients from both university and municipal hospitals in all parts of Germany, the present study is not population-based; therefore, certain limitations apply when interpreting its results. However, precise and unselected clinical data of an equally high number of patients can be obtained neither from a population-based register nor from a clinical study.

According to an ongoing population-based stroke registry in the city of Erlangen (Germany), almost 95% of all stroke patients in Germany are admitted to the hospital for acute treatment, and even in the elderly (aged >75 years), the admission rate is >90%.4 Mean age in the present study was 69.8 years for women and 65.1 years for men and was thus somewhat lower than in the Erlangen study (mean age 75.3 years for women and 69.7 years for men).4 Thus, our patients are probably representative of all stroke patients except for the oldest age groups. It is a shortcoming of the present study that participating centers did not include all consecutive patients into the data bank. Reasons given for not including a patient were forgetfulness or lack of time of the treating physicians, loss of questionnaires, early referrals, or misdiagnoses. Because 6 centers with a near complete inclusion rate (>=95%) showed only minor differences regarding stroke subtypes, age, sex, and risk factor distribution, the patients included in the present study most likely represent a random sample of all patients hospitalized in German neurology departments with acute-stroke units. There is no reason to believe that the ascertainment of risk factors differed between stroke subtypes; therefore, the data bank lends itself to investigate the association of risk factors with different stroke subtypes, which was a main focus of the present study. Despite many advantages, population-based stroke registries have often lacked the power to detect differences between stroke subtypes because of small sample size,1,2 a problem that is overcome by the large number of patients in our hospital-based data bank.

The TOAST criteria are a reliable tool to determine etiologic subtypes of ischemic stroke.3 Using the TOAST criteria, interphysician agreement was shown to be high for stroke caused by cardioembolism and large-artery atherosclerosis but lower for stroke due to microangiopathy or stroke of undefined etiology.5 Therefore, interrater variability and misclassification cannot be excluded in the present study. Among the most difficult problems is the differentiation between lacunar stroke and small subcortical infarcts due to embolism or intracranial branch atheromatous occlusion.6 However, ancillary tests were more frequently used in our patients than in recent studies,2 a fact that strengthens the reliability of our subtype classification.

Similar to a recently published population-based study in a mainly white population2 but in contrast to several older studies712 that used different stroke classifications and included different ethnical groups, the present study found cardioembolism to be the most common etiology of stroke (25.6%) in our almost exclusively white study population. Cardioembolic stroke particularly dominated in the oldest age group. This is most likely caused by the increase of atrial fibrillation parallel to aging.1315 In contrast, large-artery atherosclerosis was the most prevalent etiology in middle-aged patients (aged 45 to 70 years). Despite the frequent use of ancillary tests, the rate of unclassified stroke was still 23%, a proportion that is smaller than in some studies2,16,17 but comparable to many other studies.7,11,18

The present study shows a strong male preponderance in stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis and a less pronounced dominance of men in the other stroke subtypes, with the striking exception of cardioembolic stroke, for which slightly >50% of the patients were women, which can be explained by the higher age in this subgroup. Unlike a previous study2 but similar to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) Stroke Data Bank,19 we found strong differences in prior TIA rates among stroke subtypes, with macroangiopathic stroke being most often and cardioembolic stroke being least frequently preceded by TIA. In contrast, the rate of previous stroke was similar in macroangiopathic and cardioembolic stroke. This is compatible with the hypothesis that cardiac emboli particularly often lead to persistent vessel occlusion and definite infarction.

Arterial hypertension, the single most frequent stroke risk factor, showed a high prevalence in all stroke subtypes, except for combined other etiologies. The results confirm the hypothesis that hypertension and diabetes mellitus are more common in microangiopathic stroke than in cardioembolism. Our hypothesis that their prevalence is also higher in stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis is confirmed only for hypertension but not for diabetes mellitus. In the NINCDS Stroke Data Bank, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were more common in lacunar and atherothrombotic stroke than in cardioembolic stroke.19 In the Rochester Study,2 the prevalence of hypertension was not different among stroke subtypes, and diabetes mellitus was less common in atherothrombotic than in lacunar and cardioembolic stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project found no differences between lacunar and cardioembolic stroke regarding hypertension or diabetes mellitus.1 Fisher20 originally suggested that lacunar stroke was almost exclusively caused by small-vessel disease related to hypertension. Our results, based on the largest sample size so far, support this concept by indicating that hypertension and diabetes mellitus are more closely associated with microangiopathic stroke than with other stroke subtypes, although causality between risk factors and stroke subtype cannot be inferred from our data. We cannot exclude that the simultaneous presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus may have influenced physicians toward a diagnosis of cerebral microangiopathy in some patients with doubtful etiology. However, with the TOAST criteria applied, it appears unlikely that such ascertainment bias could account for the whole effect detected.

Results for hypercholesterolemia as a stroke risk factor are contradictory,21 and previous studies on stroke subtypes did not include this risk factor. Our results indicate that hypercholesterolemia plays a role in some but not in other stroke etiologies. The high prevalence in atherothrombotic stroke is in line with a previous study that identified hypercholesterolemia as a risk factor for stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis.21 Furthermore, our results allow us to generate the hypothesis that hypercholesterolemia is associated with stroke due to cerebral microangiopathy. To the best of our knowledge, such an association has not been reported so far, and further studies are required to specifically investigate this issue. In accordance with a recent Japanese study that identified obesity as a risk factor for lacunar infarction in women,22 we found a particularly high prevalence of obesity in patients with microangiopathy.

The prevalence of current smoking was rather low among our patients but comparable to that found in previous studies in Germany.18,23 Our finding that smoking is mainly associated with stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis is in accordance with our own hypothesis and with previous results.2,24,25 Smoking may furthermore contribute to uncommon etiologies in younger patients (eg, coagulopathy in female smokers taking oral contraceptives) but appears to be less important in other stroke subtypes. Smoking was not unanimously identified as a risk factor for stroke by large prospective studies.26,27 The different impact of smoking on various subtypes of stroke may partly account for these varying results. Several studies indicated a J- or U-shaped association between alcohol consumption and carotid atherosclerosis, with light drinkers facing a lower risk than either heavy drinkers or abstainers.28,29 In the present study, daily alcohol consumption was most often reported by patients with atherothrombotic stroke, supporting the hypothesis that high intake of alcohol may be associated with atherogenesis. Daily alcohol consumption was relatively infrequent in cardioembolic stroke, which may partly be explained by the higher age of this subgroup.

Similar to studies that focused on atrial fibrillation,15,30,31 we found that cardioembolic stroke was associated with the highest mortality and worst functional outcome after 90 days and the most severe acute neurological deficit. Consequently, thrombolytic therapy was most often administered in cardioembolism. The poor prognosis in cardioembolic stroke was mainly caused by the index stroke, whereas early stroke recurrence was low in these patients. In line with previous studies, early stroke recurrence was most common in macroangiopathic stroke.2,17,32 The reason for this difference is poorly understood. It could be argued that the frequent use of anticoagulants may prevent further cardioembolic events, whereas rapidly effective measures may not be available for arterial embolism. However, results from recent studies do not support this hypothesis.17 Instead, stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis is particularly prone to procedure-related cerebral ischemia, which may partly account for the higher risk of recurrent ischemia in this subtype. As expected, patients with lacunar stroke had the mildest deficits and the best prognosis among all subtypes.33,34

One aim of modern stroke therapy is to tailor treatment and secondary prevention to stroke etiology and individual conditions of the patient to optimize the risk-benefit ratio. The results support our initial hypothesis that early and permanent secondary prevention are adjusted to stroke etiology; eg, only a few patients with a final diagnosis of microangiopathy received intravenous and oral anticoagulants, whereas such therapy was frequently used in patients with cardioembolism or combined other etiologies. Despite the frequent use of heparin early after stroke, the rate of secondary parenchymal hemorrhage was rather low (1.7%), suggesting that physicians take into account contraindications and associated risks of this therapy.

In conclusion, our results foster the concept of ischemic stroke as a polyetiologic disease with profound differences between subtypes regarding age and sex distribution, risk factors, outcome, and current treatment strategies. Our findings support the hypotheses that both smoking and high alcohol intake are associated mainly with stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis and suggest a particular link between stroke from small-vessel disease, obesity, and hypercholesterolemia. However, to confirm any causality, our findings require investigation in prospective studies. Therefore, future studies on risk factors of ischemic stroke should differentiate between stroke etiologies to unmask the role of particular risk factors (eg, smoking and hypercholesterolemia) for single subtypes.


*    Appendix
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Appendix
down arrowReferences
 
Participating Centers and Investigators of the German Stroke Data Bank
Department of Neurology Klinikum Minden (J. Glahn, MD); Department of Neurology, Krankenhaus München-Harlaching (M. Wimmer, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Essen (C. Weimar, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Hamburg (S. Neumaier, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg (P. Ringleb, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig (D.S. Schneider, MD); Department of Neurology, Benjamin Franklin University of Berlin (C. Koennecke, MD); Department of Neurology, Rheinische Landesklinik Bonn (C. Kley, MD); Department of Neurology, Asklepiosklinik Bad Salzhausen (G.M. von Reutern, MD); Department of Neurology, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd (G. Krzocek, MD); Department of Neurology, Klinikum Großhadern (G.F. Hamann, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg (T. Hölscher, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Rostock (A. Kloth, MD); Department of Neurology, St. Katharinen-Hospital Frechen (R. Adams, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Greifswald (J. Machetanz, MD); Department of Neurology, Klinikum Charité Berlin (L. Harms, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Magdeburg (M. Goertler, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Jena (J. Roether, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Tübingen (M. Fetter, MD); Department of Neurology, University of Ulm (M. Riepe, MD); Department of Neurology, Bürgerhospital Stuttgart (O. Schwarz, MD); Department of Neurology, Kliniken Gilead Bielefeld (A. Schacker, MD); and Department of Neurology, University of Münster (H. Henningsen, MD).


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the Stiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe as well as the following sponsors: Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squib, Boehringer Ingelheim, Glaxo-Wellcome, Heinz-Nixdorf-Stiftung, Janssen-Cilag, Knoll, Sanofi-Synthelabo, and Schering. This sponsorship was not performed to identify patients for randomized trials.

Received June 19, 2001; revision received August 15, 2001; accepted August 15, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAppendix
*References
 

  1. Lodder J, Bamford JM, Sandercock PAG, Jones LN, Warlow CP. Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? Stroke. 1990; 21: 375–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JRD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2513–2516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EEIII. Classification of subtype of acute stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke. 1993; 24: 35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kolominsky-Rabas PL. Sart C, Heuschmann PU, Graf C, Siemonsen S, Neundörfer B, Katalinic A, Lang E, Gassmann KG, Ritter von Stockert T. A prospective community-based study of stroke in Germany: The Erlangen Stroke Project (ESPro): incidence and case fatality at 1, 3, and 12 months. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2501–2506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gordon DL, Bendixen BH, Adams HP Jr, Clarke W, Kappelle LJ, Woolson RF. Interphysician agreement in the diagnosis of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke: implications for clinical trials: the TOAST Investigators. Neurology. 1993; 43: 1021–1027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Caplan LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology. 1989; 39: 1246–1250.[Free Full Text]
  7. Mohr JP, Caplan LR, Melski JW, Goldstein RJ, Duncan GW, Kistler JP, Pessin MS, Bleich HL. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry. Neurology. 1978; 28: 754–762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chambers BR, Donnan GA, Baldin PF. Patterns of stroke: an analysis of the first 700 consecutive admissions to the Austin Hospital stroke unit. Aust N Z J Med. 1983; 13: 57–64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Yatsu FM, Becker C, McLeroy KR, Coull B, Reibel J, Howard G, Toole JF, Walker MD. Community-hospital based stroke programs: North Carolina, Oregon, and New York, I: goals, objectives, and data collection procedures. Stroke. 1986; 17: 276–284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with first stroke. Stroke. 1988; 19: 1083–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Friday G, Lai SM, Alter M, Sobel E, LaRue L, Gil-Peralta A, McCoy RL, Levitt LP, Isack T. Stroke in the Lehigh Valley: racial/ethnic differences. Neurology. 1989; 39: 1165–1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rothrock JF, Lyden PD, Brody ML, Taft-Alvarez B, Kelly N, Mayer J, Wiederholt BC. An analysis of ischemic stroke in an urban southern California population: the University of California, San Diego, Stroke Data Bank. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 619–624.[Abstract]
  13. Campbell A, Caird FI, Jackson TFM. Prevalence of abnormalities of electrocardiogram in old people. Br Heart J. 1974; 36: 1005–1011.[Free Full Text]
  14. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly: the Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147: 1561–1564.[Abstract]
  15. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1765–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sacco RL, Ellenberg JH, Mohr JP, Tatemichi TK, Hier DB, Price TR, Wolf PA. Infarcts of undetermined cause: the NINCDS Stroke Data Bank. Ann Neurol. 1989; 25: 382–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1265–1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Grau A, Buggle F, Becher H, Zimmermann E, Spiel M, Fent T, Maiwald M, Werle E, Zorn M, Hengel H, et al. Recent bacterial and viral infection is a risk factor for cerebrovascular ischemia: clinical and biochemical analysis. Neurology. 1998; 50: 196–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chamorro A, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Kase CS, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, Price TR, Hier DB. Clinical-computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1991; 22: 175–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fisher CM. The arterial lesions underlying lacunes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1969; 12: 1–15.
  21. Hachinski V, Graffagnino C, Beaudry M, Bernier G, Buck C, Donner A, Spence JD, Doig G, Wolfe BM. Lipids and stroke: a paradox resolved: Arch Neurol. 1996; 53: 303–308.[Abstract]
  22. Tanizaki Y, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, Shinoh Arima H, Tanaka H, Ibayashi S, Fujishima M. Incidence and risk factors for subtypes of cerebral infarction in the general population. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2616–2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Grau A, Buggle F, Heindl S, Steichen-Wiehn C, Banerjee T, Maiwald M, Rohlfs M, Suhr H, Fiehn W, Becher H, et al. Recent infection as a risk factor for cerebrovascular ischemia. Stroke. 1995; 26: 373–379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ingall TJ, Homer D, Baker HL, Kottke BA, O’Fallon WM, Whisnant JP. Predictors of intracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis: duration of cigarette smoking and hypertension are more powerful than serum lipid levels. Arch Neurol. 1991; 48: 687–691.[Abstract]
  25. Mast H, Thompson JLP, Lin IF, Hofmeister C, Hartmann A, Marx P, Mohr JP, Sacco RL. Cigarette smoking as a determinant of high-grade carotid artery stenosis in Hispanic, black, and white patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 1998; 29: 908–912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Welin L, Svärdsudd K, Wilhelmsen L, Larsson B, Tibblin G. Analysis of risk factors for stroke in a cohort of men born in 1913. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 521–526.[Abstract]
  27. Ellekjær EF, Wyller TB, Sverre JM, Holmen J. Lifestyle factors and risk of cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1992; 23: 829–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Rungger G, Egger G, Oberhollenzer F, Bonora E, for the Bruneck Study Group. Alcohol consumption and atherosclerosis: what is the relation?: prospective results from the Bruneck Study. Stroke. 1998; 29: 900–907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hillbom M, Juvela S, Numminen H. Alcohol intake and the risk of stroke. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1999; 6: 223–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sandercock P, Bamford J, Dennis M, Burn J, Slattery J, Jones L, Boonyakarnkul S, Warlow C. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: prevalence in different types of stroke and influence on early and long term prognosis. BMJ. 1992; 305: 1460–1465.
  31. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1760–1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sacco RL, Foulkes MA, Mohr JP, Wolf PA, Hier DB, Price TR. Determinants of early recurrence of cerebral infarction: the Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1989; 20: 983–989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sacco SE, Whisnant JP, Broderick JP, Philips SJ, O’Fallon WM. Epidemiological characteristics of lacunar infarcts in a population. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1236–1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sacco RL, Shi T, Zamanillo MC, Kargman DE. Predictors of mortality and recurrence after hospitalized cerebral infarction in an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology. 1994; 44: 626–634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
I van Wijk, P J Koudstaal, L J Kappelle, J van Gijn, J W Gorter, A Algra, and for the LiLAC Study Group
Long-term occurrence of death and cardiovascular events in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: comparison between arterial and cardiac source of the index event
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 79(8): 895 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Bejot, A. Catteau, M. Caillier, O. Rouaud, J. Durier, C. Marie, A. Di Carlo, G.-V. Osseby, T. Moreau, and M. Giroud
Trends in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Survival in Symptomatic Lacunar Stroke in Dijon, France, From 1989 to 2006: A Population-Based Study
Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 1945 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Doufekias, A. Z. Segal, and J. R. Kizer
Cardiogenic and aortogenic brain embolism.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1049 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. L. Air and B. M. Kissela
Diabetes, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Ischemic Stroke: Epidemiology and possible mechanisms
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2007; 30(12): 3131 - 3140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2803 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1006 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Ois, E. Cuadrado-Godia, J. Jimenez-Conde, M. Gomis, A. Rodriguez-Campello, J. E. Martinez-Rodriguez, E. Munteis, and J. Roquer
Early Arterial Study in the Prediction of Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2085 - 2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M O McCarron, M Armstrong, and P McCarron
Effect of European working time directive on a stroke unit
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 445 - 446.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
H.-C. Diener
Update on clopidogrel and dual anti-platelet therapy: neurology
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2006; 8(suppl_G): G15 - G19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Moussouttas, L. Aguilar, K. Fuentes, B. Anyanwu, H. Manassarians, N. Papamitsakis, Q. Shi, and P. Visintainer
Cerebrovascular disease among patients from the Indian subcontinent.
Neurology, September 12, 2006; 67(5): 894 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. J.M. Scholte op Reimer, D. W.J. Dippel, C. L. Franke, R. J. v. Oostenbrugge, G. de Jong, S. Hoeks, and M. L. Simoons
Quality of Hospital and Outpatient Care After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Insights From a Stroke Survey in The Netherlands
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1844 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Touze, O. Varenne, G. Chatellier, S. Peyrard, P. M. Rothwell, and J.-L. Mas
Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Vascular Death After Transient Ischemic Attack and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2748 - 2755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Jood, C. Ladenvall, A. Rosengren, C. Blomstrand, and C. Jern
Family History in Ischemic Stroke Before 70 Years of Age: The Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1383 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. S. Babiarz, D. M. Yousem, W. Bilker, and B. A. Wasserman
Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Relationship of Cavernous Carotid Artery Calcification
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1505 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Jackson and C. Sudlow
Are Lacunar Strokes Really Different?: A Systematic Review of Differences in Risk Factor Profiles Between Lacunar and Nonlacunar Infarcts
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 891 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Etgen, H. Baum, K. Sander, and D. Sander
Cardiac Troponins and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Ischemic Stroke Do Not Relate to Clinical Prognosis
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 270 - 275.
[Abstract]