Stroke. 2001;32:2833-2835
doi: 10.1161/hs1201.99511
(Stroke. 2001;32:2833.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Effect and Feasibility of Controlled Rewarming After Moderate Hypothermia in Stroke Patients With Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery
Thorsten Steiner, MD;
Tim Friede, PhD;
Alfred Aschoff, MD;
Peter Dieter Schellinger, MD;
Stefan Schwab, MD
Werner Hacke, MD
From the Department of Neurology (T.S., A.A., P.D.S., S.S., W.H.) and the Medical Biometry Unit (T.F.), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Correspondence to Thorsten Steiner, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail thorsten_steiner{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Background and Purpose Moderate hypothermia has been
found to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) significantly in
patients who have severe middle cerebral artery infarction.
However, during passive rewarming, ICP continuously rises and
some patients suffer transtentorial herniation.
Methods We investigated the question of whether slower rewarming leads to slower increase in ICP and slower decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Furthermore, we studied feasibility of slow, controlled rewarming. ICP, CPP, and core body temperature were monitored continuously. Achievement of rewarming protocol was assessed by hit rate of temperature target intervals. Side effects of hypothermia were assessed.
Results Rates of change of both ICP and CPP were correlated significantly with increase in temperature (ICP r=0.62, P=0.002; CPP r=-0.50, P=0.017). In feasibility analysis of 13 controlled rewarmed patients, hit rate of temperature target intervals was 63% (median; range 48% to 81%); hit rate within the target interval or below was 79% (median; range 62% to 94%).
Conclusions Slow, controlled rewarming is feasible and may be used for ICP and CPP control after moderate hypothermia for space-occupying infarction.
Key Words: stroke, ischemic brain edema intracranial pressure hypothermia
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
About 3% to 10% of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA)
territory infarction develop space-occupying hemispheric edema
with increases in intracranial pressure (ICP), subsequent transtentorial
herniation, and brain stem compression.
1 Moderate hypothermia
(body temperature 32°C to 33°C for 48 to 72 hours) has
been found to reduce ICP significantly in these patients.
2 However,
during rewarming, ICP continuously rises and some patients suffer
transtentorial herniation.
Until 1998, rewarming took place in a passive manner; ie, after hypothermia, the cooling system was stopped and the rewarming process ensued without induction of any cooling or rewarming device within the next 17 to 24 hours (median 18 hours).2 We refer to this rewarming protocol as "passive rewarming." To address the question of whether prolonged and controlled rewarming would lower risk of critical rewarming, we studied modified controlled rewarming. Feasibility of the protocol was analyzed by hit rates of the target interval (HTI) for the temperature.
 |
Subjects and Methods
|
|---|
We studied a consecutive series of 15 patients with malignant
MCA infarction who underwent therapeutic hypothermia for 72
hours. Patients with any previous disabling neurological diseases
or terminal illness were excluded from the protocol, which was
approved by the local ethics committee. "Controlled rewarming"
was defined as an increase in temperature of 0.1°C to 0.2°C
over 2 to 4 hours (
Figure 1) and was achieved by actively slowing
down the process of passive rewarming. The cooling blanket (Polar
Bair, Augustine Medical) or mattress (Hico-Variotherm 530, Hirtz)
was switched on and off to achieve the planned increase in temperature.
ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and core temperature
were evaluated continuously. Technical procedures to measure
these parameters were identical to those used in our previous
study.
2 Side effects were documented. To increase number of
patients for the correlation analysis, we added 10 patients
from our previous study who underwent the same hypothermia protocol
except for the passive rewarming protocol within 24 hours.
2 An additional 15 patients from that previous study could not
be included because at least 1 of the parameters was not recorded
continuously.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Example from a patient with controlled rewarming. Core temperature (dashed line), ICP (gray), and CCP (solid) during rewarming phase are fitted by regression lines. Slopes can be interpreted as rates of change.
|
|
Statistical Methods
For each patient, hourly measurements of temperature, ICP, and CPP during the rewarming phase were summarized by rates of change.3 To investigate whether rates of change of ICP and CPP during the rewarming phase depend on rewarming velocity, we calculated nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficients. To analyze compliance with and feasibility of the protocol, we introduce the concept of target areas for the temperature and measured the hit rate within these target areas, which we explain by a constructed example (Figure 2).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Constructed example illustrates concept of target areas for core temperature. At time point 1 (a), core temperature is 33.0°C (). According to the rewarming protocol (see Subjects and Methods), rectangular target area (shaded area) is defined by its lower left corner at 33.1°C (33.0+0.1°C) at time point 3 and its upper right corner at 33.2°C (33.0+0.2°C) at time point 5. At time point 2 (b), another target area is calculated in the same manner. A third target area is computed at time point 3 (c). Now 3 target areas exist to define target interval for time point 5, which is given by lowest and highest temperature of shaded area at time point 3. HTI (d) is calculated as proportion of number of measurements in shaded area (starting with measurement 3). Both measurements (time points 3 and 4) lie within shaded area, which leads to a hit rate of 100%.
|
|
 |
Results
|
|---|
Fifteen patients were treated after the controlled rewarming
protocol. Of these, 2 died during the cooling phase of hypothermia;
therefore, these patients had to be excluded from the rewarming
analysis. One patient was excluded because ICP/CPP values were
not recorded as a result of logistic problems. However, because
temperature had been measured, feasibility analysis could be
performed for this patient. Three of 13 controlled rewarmed
patients died during and after the rewarming phase: 2 from herniation
and 1 of septic complications. The following nonfatal complications
during the rewarming phase were registered (numbers indicate
numbers of patients): pulmonary infections 12, septic syndrome
3, arrhythmia 2, coagulatory disturbances 3, and pancreatitis
during hypothermia (which improved after rewarming) 2.
Time between onset of symptoms and start of hypothermia was 4 to 84 hours (median 17 hours). Time to reach target cooling temperature was from 2 to 7 hours. Duration of controlled rewarming was 26 to 88 hours (median 59 hours).
Correlation analyses of slopes including 12 controlled rewarmed and 10 passively rewarmed patients reveal significant correlations of temperature with both ICP and CPP, for which rs=0.62 (P=0.002) and rs=-0.50 (P=0.017), respectively. Correlation analyses alone from 12 controlled rewarmed patients already had shown a significant correlation for CPP (rs=-0.67, P=0.02) but not ICP (rs=0.35, P=0.27).
HTI for the controlled rewarming protocol was 63% median (range 48% to 81%, n=13). In half of the patients, HTI was between 53% and 68% (first and third quartiles, respectively). Because fast rewarming might harm the patient, we considered it reasonable to calculate hits within and below the target interval. Hit rates within and below the target interval came to 79% median (range 62% to 94%).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Hypothermia may control ICP during the cooling phase in patients
with malignant MCA infarction.
2 However, the rewarming period
seems to be a critical phase, as has been observed in clinical
studies and animal experiments.
2,4,5 In the present study, slower
rewarming correlated with slower increase in ICP elevations
and slower decrease in CPP. Several studies
68 experiences
suggest that metabolic mechanisms, which occur along the ischemic
cascade and lead to edema formation, are interrupted or at least
slowed down by moderate hypothermia. However, during rewarming,
these mechanisms may restart. Therefore, slowing the speed of
rewarming may decrease the metabolic changes to a degree that
can be handled by cellular and metabolic compensating mechanisms
of the brain.
Although hypothermia can lead to several complications,6 experiences with the occurrence of complications and a prolonged rewarming seem to vary among studies.5 Controlled rewarming in the present study consists of an active slowing down of passive rewarming by intermittent surface cooling with the use of cooling blankets and mattresses. Because controlling the temperature deviation around the target increase in temperature is important, this procedure needs to be performed by a well-trained nursing staff. However, our results show that controlled rewarming can be achieved.
In conclusion, controlled rewarming after moderate hypothermia in space-occupying infarctions is feasible and improves CPP and ICP control during the critical period of rewarming. Because the number of patients in the present study is small, the present results should be verified by additional larger studies.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We are grateful to Renzo Manara (Department of Neurology, University
of Padua, Padua, Italy) and Sally Hollis (Medical Statistics
Unit, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK) for their support.
We thank the personnel of the Heidelberg Neurologic Intensive
Care Unit without whose efforts the present work would not have
been possible.
Received October 27, 2000;
revision received July 2, 2001;
accepted August 23, 2001.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. "Malignant" middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Arch Neurol. 1996; 53: 309315.[Abstract]
-
Schwab S, Schwarz S, Spranger M, Keller E, Bertram M, Hacke W. Moderate hypothermia in the treatment of patients with severe middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1998; 29: 24612466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990; 300: 230235.
-
Ebmeyer U, Safar P, Radovsky A, Obrist W, Alexander H, Pomeranz S. Moderate hypothermia for 48 hours after temporary epidural brain compression injury in a canine outcome model. J Neurotrauma. 1998; 15: 323336.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shiozaki T, Kato A, Taneda M, Hayakata T, Hashiguchi N, Tanaka H, Shimazu T, Sugimoto H. Little benefit from mild hypothermia therapy for severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1999; 91: 185191.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dempsey RJ, Combs DJ, Maley ME, Cowen DE, Roy MW, Donaldson DL. Moderate hypothermia reduces postischemic edema development and leukotriene production. Neurosurgery. 1987; 21: 177181.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dietrich WD, Halley M, Valdes I, Busto R. Interrelationships between increased vascular permeability and acute neuronal damage following temperature-controlled brain ischemia in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 1991; 81: 615625.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ginsberg MD, Sternau LL, Globus MY-T, Dietrich WD, Busto R. Therapeutic modulation of brain temperature: relevance to ischemic brain injury. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1992; 4: 189225.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Maher J, Hachinski V. Hypothermia as a potential treatment for cerebral ischemia. Brain Metab Rev. 1993; 5: 277300.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al.
REPRINT: Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.
Circulation,
October 16, 2007;
116(16):
e391 - e413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al.
Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.
Stroke,
June 1, 2007;
38(6):
2001 - 2023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Danton and W. D. Dietrich
The Search for Neuroprotective Strategies in Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.,
February 1, 2004;
25(2):
181 - 194.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. D. Dietrich and J. W. Kuluz
New Research in the Field of Stroke: Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest
Stroke,
April 1, 2003;
34(4):
1051 - 1053.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Leker, H. Ovadia, S. Schwab, D. Georgiadis, P. D. Schellinger, J. Berrouschot, C. Graffagnino, and S. A. Mayer
Re: Feasibility and Safety of Moderate Hypothermia After Massive Hemispheric Infarction
Stroke,
March 1, 2002;
33(3):
877 - 878.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|