| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2001;32:606.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland (New Zealand) (C.N.M., C.A.); Department of Public Health, University of Western Australia, Perth (K.J., G.H.); Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Royal Perth Hospital (Western Australia) (G.H.); and Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania, Australia (D.D.).
Correspondence to Dr Cliona Ni Mhurchu, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail c.nimhurchu{at}ctru.auckland.ac.nz
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, population-based, case-control study performed in 4 major urban centers in Australia and New Zealand. Two hundred sixty-eight female cases of first-ever aneurysmal SAH occurred during 19951998. Controls were 286 frequency-matched women from the general population of each center. Outcome measures included risk of SAH associated with use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and various endogenous hormonal factors including menstrual patterns, parity, age at birth of first child, and breast-feeding practices.
ResultsCases and controls did not differ with regard to menstrual and reproductive history except in age at birth of first child, where older age was associated with reduced risk of SAH (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43, 0.91). Relative to never use of HRT, the adjusted OR for ever use of HRT was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.41, 0.98), which did not alter significantly after further adjustment for possible confounding factors. Borderline evidence of an inverse association was detected for past use of HRT (adjusted OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30, 1.13) and current use of HRT (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40, 1.13), but there was no evidence of an association for use of OCPs (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58, 1.60).
ConclusionsThe risks of SAH are lower in women whose first pregnancy is at an older age and women who have ever used HRT but not OCPs. The findings suggest an independent etiologic role for hormonal factors in the pathogenesis of aneurysmal SAH and provide support for a protective role for HRT on risk of SAH in postmenopausal women.
Key Words: case-control studies epidemiology hormones risk factors subarachnoid hemorrhage
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study (ACROSS) was a large prospective, multicenter, population-based, case-control study of SAH. We present here results that pertain to the relationship between SAH and menstrual and reproductive history and use of hormonal therapy, both OCPs and HRT.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 years) was approximately 2.8 million according to
the 1996 census for each city. A wide range of overlapping sources and
harmonized data collection procedures were used to ascertain all cases
of primary aneurysmal SAH that occurred over staggered
whole-year intervals in the population between November 1995 and June
1998. SAH was defined according to standard criteria as an abrupt onset
of severe headache and/or loss of consciousness, with or without focal
neurological signs, and in which CT, necropsy, or lumbar puncture
revealed focal or generalized blood in the subarachnoid
space.12 Patients whose
hemorrhage was found definitely to originate from sources other
than an intracranial aneurysm (including primary
intracerebral hemorrhage, arteriovenous
malformations, trauma, infections, bleeding diathesis, and neoplasms)
were excluded. Those patients with proven hemorrhage in whom an
aneurysm could not be identified either by cerebral angiography
or at necropsy were included, as were 3 patients with acute severe
headache followed by death within hours. Each event during the study
period was classified as being the patients first-ever or a recurrent
SAH. Controls with no history of SAH were randomly selected from electoral rolls and frequency matched to cases for sex, age (10-year strata), and city of residence, on the basis of the projected incidence. Enrollment to vote is compulsory for adults in Australia and New Zealand. A postal invitation to participate in the study was followed up with a telephone call. Replacements were sought when potential control subjects could not be contacted by telephone or by personal visit (after several attempts) or when they had moved outside the study area. On the assumption that proxy interviews would be required for approximately 40% of case subjects because of early death or disability, matching also included interviews with a nominated relative, friend, or other reliable informant. Controls were enrolled in the study during the same period as that in which cases were ascertained and interviewed. Institutional ethics committees in each of the study centers approved the protocol. All participants provided informed consent, including next of kin for case subjects who were severely ill, unconscious, or deceased, and from proxy respondents for control subjects.
As soon as possible after notification, trained study nurses
undertook face-to-face interviews with case subjects or, in cases in
which they were deceased or disabled, with the partner or next of kin.
Control subjects or their proxies were interviewed at home. A
structured questionnaire was used to obtain information regarding age,
ethnicity (white or other), highest level of education (secondary only
or postsecondary), and occupation. Socioeconomic status was classified
into 6 categories: 3 nonmanual categories (classes 1, 2, and 3) and 3
manual categories (classes 4, 5, and 6). These strata are primarily
based on occupation,13 but
level of education and profession of spouse (or partner) were also
taken into account. Subjects were questioned about their lifetime use
of OCP and HRT (current, past, or never) and about their menstrual and
reproductive history. Limited information was obtained on the type,
dose, or duration of hormonal therapy. Subjects were also questioned
about their lifetime use of tobacco (never, current, or ex-smoker >12
months), about their use of alcohol in the previous 2 weeks (number of
units per week), and whether a doctor had ever told them that they had
hypertension, heart disease (angina, myocardial infarction), or
diabetes mellitus. Usual level of activity was categorized as sedentary
(<1 session per week) or active (
1 session per week) on the basis of
the frequency of vigorous exertion (lasting
15 minutes) in the course
of work, activities about the house, or
recreation.14 Body mass
index (BMI) was calculated as self-reported weight (kg) divided by
height (m2). A random nonfasting blood
sample was taken from subjects for measurement of serum
cholesterol at the laboratories of major hospitals in the
study centers. For subjects who were unavailable or refused blood
samples, serum cholesterol levels were estimated from other
sources, either from (1) their general practitioner or
hospital medical records or, when this information was not
available, from (2) the most recent cholesterol level
recalled by the subject.
Differences between study groups were examined with the
2 test for categorical variables and
independent sample t tests for
continuous variables. Values of
P<0.05 were considered
statistically significant. Unconditional multiple logistic regression
with SAS software15 was used
to model the incidence of SAH in relation to various hormonal factors.
The OR and 95% CI were used to estimate relative risk. To avoid
problems associated with sparse data, missing values were imputed with
the use of the "hot deck" approach provided by SOLAS
software.16 This method
adopts a strategy based on the similarity of incomplete and complete
records. For each missing variable, a value was imputed from
that of a subject with complete data who had the characteristics most
similar to that of the subject with incomplete data, while also
maintaining the appropriate measurement index for that variable
(ie, categorical versus continuous). In this analysis, imputed
variables were necessary for cholesterol level (missing
values=111), BMI (missing values=44), smoking status (missing
values=23), alcohol intake (missing values=34), and history of
hypertension (missing values=19). The hot deck method was used
separately for cases and controls on the basis of city, age, and social
class. Imputed data were only used in the multiple logistic regression
analyses to ensure stability of the models. Multiple logistic
regression was performed with adjustment for matched factors (age,
study center, use of proxy respondent) and confounding variables
associated with both exposure and outcome. Two approaches were taken to
adjust for confounders: first, confounding variables were only
included in the model if they caused a meaningful change (by
10%) in
the OR17 ; second, all
possible confounding variables were forced into the model. For both
approaches, adjusted ORs are reported.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The associations between SAH and menstrual and
reproductive history are shown in
Table 2
. The risk of SAH declined with older age at first
birth (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43, 0.91). There was no significant
association with risk of SAH for any other endogenous
hormonal factors. Ever use of HRT was associated with a significant
36% reduction in odds of SAH (unadjusted OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43,
0.97)
(Table 3
). Borderline evidence of an inverse association was
seen for current use of HRT (unadjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.13)
and past use of HRT (unadjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.29, 1.02). No
evidence of an association was seen for ever use of OCPs (unadjusted
OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58, 1.17).
|
|
Adjustment for age, city, and proxy respondent did not appreciably affect the association for ever use of HRT (adjusted OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41, 0.98). Similar risk estimates were also observed for past use of HRT (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30, 1.13) and current use of HRT (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40, 1.13). There was no association for ever use of OCPs (adjusted OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.49).
In the first approach to adjustment for potential
confounding variables, in which inclusion in the model depended on
a meaningful change (by
10%) in
OR,17 social class,
ethnicity, smoking, hypertension, cholesterol level,
alcohol intake, and BMI were examined. None of these variables
altered the OR by the required 10%, and therefore they were not
retained in the models for ever, past, and current use of HRT.
Therefore, the adjusted ORs remained unaltered
(Table 3
). However, the inclusion of confounding
variables that altered the OR by a minimum of 10% did affect the
OR for ever use of OCPs and risk of SAH (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI,
0.58, 1.60).
In the second approach, potential confounding variables (social class, smoking, hypertension, cholesterol level, and alcohol intake) were forced into the models. The effect was to increase the point estimates and 95% CIs for ever use of HRT (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47, 1.18), past use (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.35, 1.41), and current use of HRT (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.44, 1.33). The point estimates remained well below unity, but the increased width and inclusion of unity of the 95% CIs reflected reduced precision due to small numbers.
Given that women who take hormones may have healthier lifestyles with fewer risk factors than women who do not,18 a comparison was made between subjects who had ever used HRT and those who had never used HRT. There were no significant differences between the groups in relation to age, cholesterol level, BMI, smoking habits, history of hypertension, or level of education. However, more users of HRT drank alcohol (79% versus 67%; P=0.01), and more users were classified into nonmanual social classes 1 to 3 (78% versus 67%; P=0.03). There was no significant difference in risk of SAH between premenopausal and postmenopausal women (age-adjusted OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.55, 1.64).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The strengths of the study include the large series of cases with uniform and strict diagnostic criteria for SAH. The cases were consecutive, a high proportion had CT (and/or necropsy) confirmation of the diagnosis, and they were derived from a set of population-based registries. Thus, the potential for systematic errors due to referral bias and misclassification of SAH is likely to be very small. Moreover, since enrollment to vote is compulsory in Australia and New Zealand, the controls were also representative of the population that gave rise to the cases. Finally, despite the high case fatality, we were able to obtain information regarding a wide range of exposures for most cases.
Differential error or bias is unavoidable in case-control studies, where information on exposures for cases is obtained under different circumstances from those for controls. In common with other epidemiological studies of SAH,6 19 20 we used proxy respondents to obtain information regarding exposures in the high proportion of the cases who were unable to be interviewed because of early death or disability. It is possible that some cases may have underreported certain exposures, such as recent alcohol intake, and proxies might have overestimated them, either of which leads to a bias. Even if efforts to frequency-match for use of proxy respondents in controls had succeeded completely, it is still possible that proxies for controls may have been more (or less) likely to give erroneous responses than proxies for cases.21 We have no reason to suspect, however, that any measurement error would have differed appreciably in magnitude between cases and controls. Most cases would not have had any prior knowledge about the hypotheses being investigated, and they were interviewed early after the event, reducing the likelihood for habits to change significantly subsequent to diagnosis. In addition, studies have reported high agreement between index and proxy respondents with regard to personal habits and medical conditions,22 23 such as those used in these analyses. Adjustment for use of proxy was made in all multivariate analyses.
Another limitation of this study, however, was that the hormonal data were based on self-report and often proxy report, and information was not confirmed from medical record review, which may have resulted in misclassification of exposures. However, there appears to be high agreement between self-report and medical records regarding the use of HRT.24
The results of earlier epidemiological analyses of the use of HRT and incident SAH have not been consistent. Our data support those of another large population-based, case-control study undertaken by Longstreth et al,6 who found that ever use of HRT was associated with a 53% reduction in odds of SAH (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.86). Ever use of OCPs also had an inverse association (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25, 1.10), although this was not significant. Interestingly, they found that the reduction in risk associated with HRT was greatest in women who had smoked compared with those who had never smoked. However, adjustments were made only for age and source of information (index subject or proxy) in the analyses; when smoking was included in the model, the association of use of HRT with risk of SAH was significantly attenuated. Other case-control25 26 27 and cohort28 29 studies have found no clear association for use of hormonal therapy and SAH, although the estimates were imprecise, as indicated by generally wide 95% CIs. Among the limitations of these studies are the use of select population groups and broader criteria for the diagnosis of SAH.
If estrogen (either alone or in combination with progestogen) reduces the risk of SAH, our results suggest that age at exposure is important. Apart from a later age of first pregnancy, there was no association of menstrual or reproductive variables or use of OCPs with the risk of SAH. The negative association between use of HRT and risk of SAH, however, supports the hypothesis of a protective role only in postmenopausal women. Because of the sample size, it is likely that lack of power is the explanation for the failure to detect a significant association for past and current users despite that seen for ever users of HRT. A number of potential beneficial vascular effects of estrogen, including those on lipid profiles, have been proposed,30 but none is as yet entirely satisfactory as an explanation regarding the propensity toward formation and rupture of cerebral aneurysms.
Since the vast majority of strokes in women occur after the menopause, there has been much hope that HRT would alleviate the burden of stroke, as it may do for cardiovascular disease.31 Many studies have been devoted to the relationships between HRT and stroke. Conflicting results have been produced for nonfatal stroke, yet consistent findings have been obtained of decreased risk for fatal stroke .31 32 Stratification by fatal and nonfatal strokes may be important in providing indirect evidence concerning HRT and the risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke because the great majority of nonfatal strokes are ischemic, while between approximately one and two thirds of fatal strokes are hemorrhagic, including SAH.33 There is growing evidence that ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes have qualitatively different associations with certain risk factors such as cholesterol.34 A similar relationship may well hold for HRT, given the present data for SAH together with those from the Nurses Health Study8 that indicate an increased risk of ischemic stroke among users of HRT (adjusted relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.92).
These data, together with those from other well-designed and -conducted epidemiological studies, provide the best evidence currently available to support a key role for hormonal therapy in the prevention of SAH among postmenopausal women.
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 18, 2000; revision received November 23, 2000; accepted December 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, Diringer M, Haley EC, Heros RC, Sternau LL, Torner J, Adams HP, Feinberg W, Thies W. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1994;25:23152328.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Teunissen LL,
Rinkel GJE, Algra A, van Gijn J. Risk factors for subarachnoid
haemorrhage: a systematic review.
Stroke. 1996;27:544549.
4.
Linn FHH, Rinkel
GJE, Algra A, van Gijn J. Incidence of subarachnoid
haemorrhage: role of region, year, and rate of computed
tomography: a meta-analysis.
Stroke. 1996;27:625629.
5. Stober T, Sen S, Anstätt T, Freier G, Schimrigk K. Direct evidence of hypertension and the possible role of post-menopausal oestrogen deficiency in the pathogenesis of berry aneurysms. J Neurol. 1985;232:6772.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Longstreth WT Jr,
Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Subarachnoid
haemorrhage and hormonal factors: a population-based
case-control study. Ann Intern
Med. 1994;121:168173.
7. Thorogood M. Stroke and steroid hormonal contraception. Contraception. 1998;57:157167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Grodstein F,
Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer PE,
Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use and the risk of
cardiovascular disease.
N Engl J Med. 1996;335:453461.
9. Paganini-Hill A. Estrogen replacement therapy and stroke. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1995;38:223242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Hannaford PC,
Owen-Smith V. Using epidemiological data to guide clinical practice:
review of studies on cardiovascular disease and use of
combined oral contraceptives.
BMJ. 1998;316:984987.
11.
Australasian
Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Study
Group. The epidemiology of aneurysmal
subarachnoid haemorrhage in Australia and New Zealand:
incidence and case fatality from the Australasian Cooperative Research
on Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Study (ACROSS).
Stroke. 2000;31:18431850.
12.
Vermeulen M, van
Gijn J. The diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage.
J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry. 1990;53:365372.
13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Classification and Classified List of Occupations. Canberra, Australia: ABS; 1980.
14. Commonwealth of Australia. The Fitness of Australians. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1992. Publication ISBN0644245867.
15. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. SAS Version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Inc; 1997.
16. Statistical Solutions LTD. SOLAS for Missing Data Analysis 1.0. Cork, Ireland: Statistical Solutions Inc; 1997.
17. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown & Co; 1998.
18.
Goldstein F.
Invited commentary: can selection bias explain the
cardiovascular benefits of hormone replacement therapy?
Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:979982.
19.
Longstreth WT Jr,
Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, Schievink WI, van Belle G. Cigarette smoking,
alcohol use, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Stroke. 1992;23:12421249.
20.
Juvela S, Hillbom
M, Numminen H, Koskinen P. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption as
risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid
haemorrhage. Stroke. 1993;24:639646.
21.
Walker AM, Velema
JP, Robins JM. Analysis of case-control data derived in part
from proxy respondents. Am J
Epidemiol. 1988;127:905914.
22. Tepper A, Connally LB, Haltmeier P, Smith E, Sweeney MH. Knowledge of medical history information among proxy respondents for deceased study subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:12431248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Nelson LM, Longstreth WT Jr, Koepsell TD, Checkoway H, van Belle G. Completeness and accuracy of interview data from proxy respondents: demographic, medical and lifestyle factors. Epidemiology. 1994;5:204217.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Jain MG. Rohan TE, Howe GR. Agreement of self-reported use of menopausal hormone replacement therapy with physician reports. Epidemiology. 1999;10:260263.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Pedersen AT, Lidegaard Ø, Kreiner S, Ottesen B. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of non-fatal stroke. Lancet. 1997;350:12771283.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. WHO Collaborative Study on Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Haemorrhagic stroke, overall stroke risk, and combined oral contraceptives: results of an international, multicentre, case-control study. Lancet. 1996;348:505510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Schwarts SM,
Petitti DB, Siscovick DS, Longstreth WT Jr, Sidney S, Raghunathan TE,
Quesenberry CP, Kelaghan J. Stroke and use of low-dose oral
contraceptive in young women: a pooled analysis of two US
studies. Stroke. 1998;29:22772284.
28.
Falkeborn M,
Persson I, Terént A, Adami H, Lithell H, Bergström R. Hormone
replacement therapy and the risk of stroke: follow-up of a
population-based cohort in Sweden. Arch
Intern Med. 1993;153:12011209.
29. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease: ten-year follow-up from the Nurses Health Study. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:756762.[Abstract]
30.
Anderson HV.
Estrogen therapy, atherosclerosis, and clinical
cardiovascular events.
Circulation. 1996;94:18091811.
31.
Bousser MG.
Stroke in women. Circulation. 1999;99:463467.
32. Sourander L, Rajala T, Räihä I, Mäkinen J, Erkkola R, Helenius H. Cardiovascular and cancer morbidity and mortality and sudden cardiac death in postmenopausal women on oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT). Lancet. 1998;352:19651969.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Bamford J,
Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. A prospective study of acute
cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community
Stroke Project198186, II: incidence, case fatality rates and
overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary
intracerebral and subarachnoid
haemorrhage. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53:1622.
34. Eastern Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease Collaborative Research Group. Blood pressure, cholesterol, and stroke in eastern Asia. Lancet. 1998;352:18011807.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research & Policy, Stanford University Stanford, California
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The search for etiologic risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is complicated because different factors may influence the risk of aneurysm formation, rupture, or both.R2 To date, some of the strongest evidence exists for cigarette smoking, hypertension and alcohol use.R3 These risk factors are more common in men than women so these factors alone do not explain the excess of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. If the effect of these risk factors were more potent in women than men, the excess of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women could be explained. The studies of risk factors that have sought evidence for such effect modification have not found it.R3 Nonetheless, one of the many benefits of controlling these risk factors would likely be a reduced risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage for both women and men.
Hormonal factors deserve careful attention in a disease that affects women more than men. Observational studies have addressed the use of oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy. The studies performed to date have not resolved the issue, and thus the work from Dr. Mhurchu and colleagues is a welcome addition. In a population-based study of subarachnoid hemorrhage from Australia and New Zealand, the investigators examined the risk associated with oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy. They found no association with ever use of oral contraceptive pills (adjusted odds ratio 0.97 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.58 to 1.60). A recent meta-analysis of oral contraceptive pills indicated a small but significant increased risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (relative risk estimate 1.42, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.80).R4 The risk was less when analyses were limited to studies of oral contraceptive pills containing low doses of estrogens, as are most commonly used nowadays. The results of the current study when added to the meta-analysis will edge the risk estimate even closer to 1.0. Of note, in a pooled analysis from two recent US case-control studies, too few users of the low-dose oral contraceptive pills were cigarette smokers or hypertensive to allow the investigators to examine whether these factors modified the small risk associated with oral contraceptive pills, as was suggested for high-dose preparations commonly used in the past.R5 The investigators recommended maintaining cigarette smoking and hypertension as contraindications to prescribing oral contraceptive pills, until evidence suggests otherwise.
Less work has been done with hormone replacement therapy, which may be more pertinent than oral contraceptive pills because the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhages is higher after menopause than before.R6 Dr. Mhurchu and colleagues found that ever use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a reduced risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98). The findings were consistent with a similarly designed study in which the reduced risk with hormone replacement therapy was limited to those who had ever smoked.R7 Other observational studies have not confirmed these findings but have potential shortcomings as reviewed by Dr. Mhurchu and colleagues. Concern remains that a protective effect of hormone replacement therapy may be an artifact resulting from residual confounding by some unmeasured or poorly measured factor. Such concerns are heightened by the results of a recent clinical trial in which hormone replacement therapy did not reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, despite the preponderance of evidence from observational studies indicating that such treatment should be beneficial.R8
We are left with an incomplete understanding of why aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage affects women more than men, or for that matter, why women are more likely than men to have multiple aneurysms.R9 Perhaps the loss of some beneficial effect of estrogens on cerebral blood vessels increases the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Men would be at less risk because they do not experience such a dramatic estrogen withdrawal, as do women. Alternatively, some interaction of other environmental and genetic factors could result in an increased risk. Genetic factors have just started to be explored but will still need to be able to explain why this disease affects women more than men. Because it is a relatively common cause of stroke in women under age 65 and because of its high morbidity and mortality, the excess of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women remains a pressing question in stroke research.
Received July 18, 2000; revision received November 23, 2000; accepted December 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Torner JC. Epidemiology of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Semin Neurol. 1984;4:354369.
3. Teunissen LL, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke. 1996;27:544549.
4.
Johnston SC,
Colford JM Jr, Gress DR. Oral contraceptives and the risk of
subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.
Neurology. 1998;51:411418.
5. Schwartz SM, Petitti DB, Siscovick DS, Longstreth WT Jr, Sidney S, Raghunathan TE, Quesenberry CP Jr, Kelaghan J. Stroke and use of low-dose oral contraceptives in young women: a pooled analysis of two US studies. Stroke. 1998;29:22772284.
6. Linn FH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of region, year, and rate of computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1996;27:625629.
7. Longstreth WT Jr, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and hormonal factors in women. A population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:168173.
8.
Hulley S, Grady D,
Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized
trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of
coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and
Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group
JAMA. 1998;280:605613.
9. Ostergaard JR, Hog E. Incidence of multiple intracranial aneurysms. Influence of arterial hypertension and gender. J Neurosurg. 1985;63:4955.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Sandvei, P. R. Romundstad, T. B. Muller, L. Vatten, and A. Vik Risk Factors for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Prospective Population Study: The HUNT Study in Norway Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 1958 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Appelros, B. Stegmayr, and A. Terent Sex Differences in Stroke Epidemiology: A Systematic Review Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1082 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N K de Rooij, F H H Linn, J A van der Plas, A Algra, and G J E Rinkel Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 78(12): 1365 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Yang, C.-C. Chang, H.-W. Kuo, and H.-F. Chiu Parity and risk of death from subarachnoid hemorrhage in women: Evidence from a cohort in Taiwan Neurology, August 8, 2006; 67(3): 514 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Feigin, G. J.E. Rinkel, C. M.M. Lawes, A. Algra, D. A. Bennett, J. van Gijn, and C. S. Anderson Risk Factors for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Updated Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2773 - 2780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Anderson, V. Feigin, D. Bennett, R.-B. Lin, G. Hankey, K. Jamrozik, and for the Australasian Cooperative Research on Subar Active and Passive Smoking and the Risk of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An International Population-Based Case-Control Study Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 633 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gaist, L. Pedersen, S. Cnattingius, and H. T. Sorensen Parity and Risk of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Women: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on National Swedish Registries Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 28 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Dumont and N. F. Kassell Editorial Comment--Parity and Risk of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Emerging Association Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 32 - 33. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wills, A. Ronkainen, M. van der Voet, H. Kuivaniemi, K. Helin, E. Leinonen, J. Frosen, M. Niemela, J. Jaaskelainen, J. Hernesniemi, et al. Familial Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 346 Multiplex Finnish Families Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1370 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Broderick, C. M. Viscoli, T. Brott, W. N. Kernan, L. M. Brass, E. Feldmann, L. B. Morgenstern, J. L. Wilterdink, and R. I. Horwitz Major Risk Factors for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Young Are Modifiable Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1375 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ohkuma, H. Tabata, S. Suzuki, and M. S. Islam Risk Factors for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Aomori, Japan Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |