(Stroke. 2001;32:842.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Presented in abstract form at the American Heart Association Stroke Conference, New Orleans, La, February 10, 2000.
From the Department of Neurology (M.S.E., R.L.S.) and Sergievsky Center (M.S.E., B.B.-A., R.L.S.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center of New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (M.S.E., R.L.S.); and Divisions of Biostatistics (J.C., M.C.P.), Sociomedical Sciences (B.B.-A.), and Epidemiology (R.L.S.), Joseph P. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Mitchell S. Elkind, MD, Neurological Institute, 710 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032. E-mail mse13{at}columbia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsFor this
cross-sectional analysis, WBC was measured in stroke-free
community subjects undergoing carotid duplex Doppler ultrasound.
Maximal internal carotid plaque thickness (MICPT) was measured for each
subject. Demographic and potential medical confounding factors were
analyzed with linear and logistic regression to calculate the
effect of quartile of WBC on MICPT. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95%
confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of quartile of WBC on MICPT
75th percentile were calculated. All analyses were stratified
by race-ethnicity.
ResultsThe mean age of
the 1422 subjects was 68.6±10.2 years; 40.0% were men; 24.4% were
white, 46.9% Hispanic, and 26.7% black. Among Hispanics, compared
with the lowest quartile of WBC, those in the highest quartile had
significantly increased MICPT (mean difference=0.30 mm,
P=0.0086) after adjustment for
age, sex, and other atherosclerotic risk factors. There was no
significant increase for blacks or whites. The OR for MICPT
75th
percentile (1.9 mm) was significantly increased for Hispanics (OR,
2.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5.6), marginally elevated for black non-Hispanics
(OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 3.2), and not increased for white
non-Hispanics (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2 to
1.1).
ConclusionsRelative elevation in WBC is associated with carotid atherosclerosis, but this relationship differs by race-ethnicity. The association is strongest in Hispanics, intermediate in black non-Hispanics, and not present in white non-Hispanics in this population. Chronic subclinical infection or inflammation may account for this association.
Key Words: atherosclerosis cerebrovascular disorders epidemiology risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
260 000
people lived in the community, with 40% older than 39 years of age and
a race-ethnic mixture consisting of 20% black, 63% Hispanic, and 15%
white residents.9
Selection of NOMASS Cohort
The methods of subject recruitment and enrollment
have been described in previous
publications.7 10
Briefly, random digit dialing of
29 000 households was performed by
Audits and Surveys, Inc. Community participants were enrolled if they
(1) had never been diagnosed with stroke, (2) were >40 years of age,
and (3) resided in Northern Manhattan for
3 months in a household
with a telephone. In-person evaluations were performed at the hospital;
those subjects who were not able to come to the hospital did not
undergo Doppler imaging and were not included in this
analysis. The telephone response rate was 94%, and 70% of
those respondents participated in an in-person evaluation. The study
was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Columbia-Presbyterian
Medical Center. All participants gave consent directly or through a
surrogate when appropriate.
Index Evaluation of Subjects
Data were collected through interviews, in-person
measurements, and collection of fasting blood specimens for lipid and
glucose measurements by trained research assistants, and
physical and neurological examinations were done by the study
physicians, as described
elsewhere.10 When possible,
data were obtained directly from subjects with the standardized data
collection instruments. When the subject was unable to provide answers,
a proxy knowledgeable about the subjects history was interviewed.
Direct subject data were obtained from 99% of stroke-free
subjects.
Assessments were conducted in English or Spanish, depending on the primary language of the participant. Race-ethnicity was based on self-identification through a series of interview questions modeled after the US Census and conforming to the standard definitions outlined by Directive 15.11 All participants responding affirmatively to being of Spanish origin or identifying themselves as Hispanic were classified as such. All participants classifying themselves as white without any Hispanic origin or as black without any Hispanic origin were classified as white, non-Hispanic or black, non-Hispanic, respectively.
Standardized questions were adapted from the Behavioral Risk
Factor Surveillance System12
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding the
following conditions: hypertension, diabetes,
hypercholesterolemia, peripheral
vascular disease, transient ischemic attack, cigarette smoking,
and cardiac conditions, such as myocardial infarction, coronary
artery disease, angina, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation,
other arrhythmias, and valvular heart disease. Standard
techniques were used to measure blood pressure, height, weight, and
fasting glucose as described in prior
publications.13 Fasting
lipid panels (including total cholesterol, low-density
lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein, and
triglycerides) were measured with a Hitachi 705 automated
spectrometer (Boehringer). Hypertension was defined as in prior
publications,14 and diabetes
mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level
127 mg/dL, the
subjects self-report of such a history, or insulin or oral
hypoglycemic use. The definitions are noted in the table
footnotes.
Assessment of WBC
WBCs were measured with automated cell counters via
standard techniques (Coulter STK-R and Coulter STK-S, Coulter
Electronics, and Sysmex SE-9500, TOA Medical Electronics). Whole blood
was collected in 5-cm3 EDTA-anticoagulated
tubes by a trained phlebotomist. The automated cell counter aspirated a
sample from the collection tube, and after lysis of red blood cells and
platelets, WBCs were counted by use of a standard direct current
detection method. Normal values for WBC in the hematology
laboratory are 3.54 to 9.06x109/L. Quality
control is maintained by the laboratory with standard procedures. The
coefficient of variation for repeated measurements on samples from
individual hospitalized patients is maintained at
2.5%.
Assessment of MICPT
The method for assessment of MICPT has been described
in a previous publication.7
Briefly, MICPT was assessed by trained ultrasonographers experienced in
the use of duplex ultrasonography for research purposes and blinded to
the participants risk factors. Ultrasonography was performed on a
Siemens Quantum 2000 duplex ultrasound system with 7.5-MHz scanning
frequency in B mode and 5.0-MHz frequency in pulsed Doppler mode.
With the subject lying in a supine position, the extracranial carotid
arteries were imaged in the longitudinal (anterior, lateral, and
posterior views) and transverse planes. Both internal carotid arteries
were examined for the presence of atherosclerotic plaque, defined as an
area of focal hyperechoic wall thickening. If no
atherosclerosis was identified, MICPT was recorded
as zero. If plaque was imaged, the view showing the thickest plaque was
frozen, and the intimal-medial wall thickness (including the plaque)
was measured with an electronic cursor and recorded as the MICPT
for that artery. For this analysis, the greater of the right
and left MICPT was used.
Statistical Analyses
Means were calculated for continuous variables,
and proportions were calculated for categorical variables.
Bonferroni-corrected t tests
were conducted for comparisons of means;
2 tests, for comparisons of proportions.
Regression analysis using linear and quadratic terms was first
performed with WBC as a continuous independent variable and MICPT
as the dependent variable, stratified by each of the 3 race-ethnic
subgroups. Residual plots were examined, and several subsequent
analyses were performed, excluding influential points to
establish the robustness of the associations. Subjects were then
divided into 4 quartiles defined by WBC. Multivariate
linear regression using a nonautomated procedure, incorporating
demographic and clinical variables, was then used to build models
for the association of WBC and MICPT, stratified by race-ethnicity. The
dependent variable for these analyses, MICPT, was expressed
as a continuous variable, despite a skewed distribution, because of
the large sample size and stable variance. Conventional atherosclerotic
risk factors were chosen for the final model on the basis of an
association with MICPT in univariate analysis or
findings of a significant association in previous analyses from
our laboratory. Analyses were then conducted to determine the
effect of quartile of WBC on MICPT as a dichotomous variable using
multivariate logistic regression, with an MICPT
75th
percentile (1.9 mm) as the cutoff. Additional logistic regression
analyses were then performed with subjects stratified by sex to
analyze differences in the associations of MICPT and plaque
thickness among the different populations. Statistical significance was
determined at the
=0.05 level with 2-sided tests. Statistical
analyses were conducted with SAS computer software (SAS
Institute).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean WBC for the entire cohort was
6.29±2.01x109/L (median, 6.0
x109/L; interquartile range, 4.9 to 7.3
x109/L; range, 1.5 to 25.7
x109/L;
Table 2
). In univariate linear regression
models stratified by race-ethnicity, WBC considered as a continuous
variable was significantly associated with MICPT among Hispanics
(ß=0.098, P<0.001) but not
among blacks or whites (ß=0.03,
P=0.33 and ß=0.03,
P=0.35, respectively). Attempts
to fit quadratic models showed no improvement in the models.
Analysis after deletion of possible influential points did not
change the main results. Further analyses were conducted with
WBC quartiles as the independent variable, with those in the lowest
quartile as the reference group (WBC
<4.9x109/L). There were differences
between the different race-ethnic groups in WBC
(Table 2
). Black non-Hispanics had the lowest mean WBC
(P<0.0001).
|
The mean MICPT for the entire cohort was 1.14±1.23 mm
(median, 1.0 mm; interquartile range, 0 to 1.9 mm). There
were also significant differences in MICPT among the 3 major
race-ethnic groups
(Table 2
). MICPT among Hispanics was significantly less than
that among non-Hispanics, but there was no significant difference
between white and black non-Hispanics. Among Hispanics, the mean MICPT
values in each of the 4 quartiles of WBC were 0.72, 0.75, 0.74, and
1.19 mm. The difference between mean MICPT in the highest and the
other 3 quartiles was significant
(P<0.05). There was no
difference between mean MICPT by quartile of WBC among the other
race-ethnic subgroups.
In linear regression models including quartile of WBC only
and stratified by race-ethnicity, among Hispanics those in the highest
quartile of WBC had a significantly increased MICPT compared with those
in the lowest quartile (mean difference=0.47,
P<0.0001;
Table 3
). For the second and third quartiles, there was no
significant association
(Table 3
). After adjustment for demographic variables
(age and sex), there remained an association for Hispanics (ß=0.41,
P=0.004) but not for black or
white non-Hispanics
(Table 3
). After multiple linear regression analysis
adjusting for potential confounders, a statistically significant
association for the highest quartile of WBC and MICPT remained among
Hispanics, although inclusion of the covariates attenuated the
relationship (ß=0.30,
P=0.0086). Thus, among
Hispanics, on average those in the highest quartile for WBC had an
MICPT that was 0.3 mm thicker than those in the lowest quartile.
The final model also included the following covariates, which were
significantly associated with MICPT among Hispanics: age from 65 to 80
years (ß=0.41, P<0.0001),
age >80 years (ß=1.03,
P<0.0001), male sex (ß=0.19,
P=0.02), LDL (ß=0.0038,
P=0.0003), coronary
artery disease (ß=0.37,
P=0.0005), and current
cigarette smoking (ß=0.46,
P=0.0002). Current smoking was
highly significantly associated with WBC level among Hispanics, with
mean WBC among current smokers and current nonsmokers of 7.56 and
6.23x109/L
(P<0.0001), respectively.
Inclusion of smoking in the model, however, did not eliminate the
effect of WBC on MICPT but did reduce the magnitude of the effect
(ß=0.40, P=0.0004 in model
without smoking; ß=0.30,
P=0.0086 in the model with
smoking). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were also included in the
final model because of their recognized importance as risk factors for
atherosclerosis and because they were associated with
MICPT in the black or white populations but not conventionally
significant among Hispanics.
|
Among white non-Hispanics, further models revealed no
significant association of WBC quartile with plaque thickness
(Table 3
). Age from 65 to 80 years (ß=0.39,
P=0.02), age >80 years
(ß=1.00, P<0.0001),
hypertension (ß=0.46,P=0.0004), current cigarette smoking
(ß=0.53, P=0.007), and
coronary artery disease (ß=0.37,
P=0.01) were significantly
associated with plaque thickness, but sex, LDL, and diabetes mellitus
were not. Similarly, among black non-Hispanics, there was no
association of WBC with plaque thickness
(Table 3
). Age from 65 to 80 years (ß=0.77,
P<0.0001), age >80 years
(ß=1.41, P<0.0001), diabetes
mellitus (ß=0.51, P=0.001),
and current smoking (ß=0.75,
P=<0.0001) were associated
with plaque thickness among black non-Hispanics. Because blacks are
known to have a lower WBC than white
populations15 (a condition
known as benign leukopenia), additional analyses were performed
with the use of within-group quartiles for blacks, but this produced no
material change in the results.
Further analyses used a dichotomous outcome
variable, MICPT
75th percentile (1.9 mm), to assess the
effect of WBC quartile on marked thickening of the vessel wall
(Table 4
). Among Hispanics, compared with those in the
lowest quartile of WBC, those in the highest quartile had a
significantly elevated risk of MICPT
1.9 mm after adjustment for
demographic and other risk factors. There was no significant increase
for those in the intermediate quartiles. Among black non-Hispanics, a
significant increase in risk was found in a model adjusted for
demographic factors for both the third and fourth quartiles, but this
was attenuated after adjustment for the other atherosclerotic risk
factors. Among white non-Hispanics, there was no evidence of an
association.
|
We further stratified our Hispanic population by sex to
determine whether the association of WBC with MICPT held for both men
and women
(Table 5
). An increase in the odds for MICPT
1.9 mm
was found for both men and women, although the magnitude of this risk
was greater for men than women (odds ratio [OR], 3.29; 95%
confidence interval [CI], 1.24 to 9.58; and OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.02
to 7.41, respectively). A formal test for an interaction between sex
and WBC did not reveal any significant effect.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies of atherosclerotic risk factors using high-resolution carotid duplex Doppler ultrasound have examined WBC among other hemostatic and infectious risk factors. One study16 found WBC to be independently predictive of progression of atherosclerosis over 2 years in a small sample of Finnish men. Another study17 that investigated several hematologic factors did not find an association, but that study examined patients with established arterial diseases. Studies of clinical atherosclerotic outcome events have found an association between leukocyte count and risk of atherosclerotic heart disease18 19 20 21 22 23 and stroke.24 25 Our study provides additional evidence that in certain populations elevations in WBC may be independently associated with a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis.
In the population examined in this study, the association of
leukocytes with atherosclerosis differed by
race-ethnicity. Among Hispanics, there appeared to be a threshold for
the relationship of WBC with MICPT, with the increase in MICPT
occurring only in the highest quartile of WBC. It is important to
recognize, however, that even the highest quartile, WBC
7.3x109/L, still fell mostly within the
normal range of WBC. Among black non-Hispanics, there was a trend
toward an increased MICPT in those with WBC in the third and fourth
quartiles, but this association was not statistically significant after
adjustment for other risk factors. The number of black non-Hispanics
was small relative to the number of Hispanics, however. Among white
non-Hispanics, our smallest group, there was no significant association
of WBC and MICPT. There was also evidence of some sex-related
heterogeneity in the association of WBC and MICPT.
Among Hispanics, the relationship was slightly stronger among men than
women. Formal tests for an interaction between WBC and sex were
negative, however.
We7 and others26 have found other differences in the prevalence of carotid wall thickening between Hispanics and non-Hispanics. Hispanics have less MICPT, even after adjustment for age and other conventional risk factors, than do non-Hispanic whites and blacks in our population. The different distribution of MICPT among Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic groups in our population does not explain the difference in the association of WBC with MICPT, however. Our analyses were stratified by race-ethnicity, so the findings within each group represent true findings. Whether an association among WBC and MICPT would be found among white or black populations with different distributions of MICPT is unclear from these data. Moreover, using group-specific thresholds for the quartile values of WBC and the MICPT cutoff for the dichotomous analysis did not change the results.
Other studies have found an association between WBC and cardiovascular disease among whites, but ours did not. Our white population may differ from the white populations examined in other studies, however. Among the studies that found WBC to be a predictor of clinical cardiovascular events, such as the Framingham, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention, Caerphilly, and Speedwell studies, the participants were generally <60 years of age.21 22 23 The mean age of our white population, however, was 72.7 years compared with mean ages among our Hispanics of 65.6 years and among our black population of 70.3 years. In the intima-media thickness progression study of men from Finland,16 participants ranged from 42 to 60 years of age. In that population, moreover, hypertension was not found to be associated with IMT progression, whereas in our study, hypertension was associated with MICPT among whites. In studies that looked at both middle-aged and older participants,20 the effect of WBC was stronger in those <65 years of age. In addition, the number of participants in the white non-Hispanic group was relatively small (n=379) compared with the black non-Hispanic and Hispanic subgroups, making the results less robust for that group.
The effect of risk factors other than WBC on atherosclerosis may also differ between Hispanics and non-Hispanics. LDL7 and the ratio of apolipoprotein (apo)B to apoA-I8 are also associated with increasing MICPT in Hispanics but not in the other race-ethnic groups in our population. Other studies have found that the effect of cardiovascular risk factors may differ between blacks and whites.27 28 The majority (88%) of our Hispanic population is composed of Caribbean Hispanics from the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, or Cuba. Risk factors in this group could also differ from those in other Hispanic groups in the United States, such as Mexicans and those from other countries. However, although Caribbean Hispanics may differ from Mexican Hispanics, it is also possible that Hispanics from these different Caribbean countries also differ from one another in important ways. It should be emphasized that American Hispanics are a heterogeneous group, that the classification of individuals as "Hispanic" can be problematic,29 and that analyses based on any assumptions of homogeneity should be viewed cautiously. Nonetheless, we used the method of self-identification to determine race-ethnicity, which is subscribed to by the US Census and recommended for all research studies.11 Moreover, if the term "Hispanic" is insufficiently accurate, nondifferential misclassification by race-ethnicity should only serve to underestimate the effects of any findings.
The findings that Hispanics in our population have less carotid plaque and that their atherosclerosis may be associated with different risk factors (LDL, WBC) than their non-Hispanic neighbors may have important implications. The recognition that atherosclerotic risk factors may have specificity for certain race-ethnic populations may be of help in targeting particular risk factor reduction strategies to those populations. The underlying cause of this race-ethnic variability remains uncertain. Genetic, dietary, and other environmental factors may all play a role. One of the benefits of the NOMASS study design is that it allows the study of 3 different race-ethnic groups living in the same relatively limited geographic area within northern Manhattan and thereby minimizes some of the environmental heterogeneity that comes from studying populations from different regions of the country. There may still be important cultural differences among the different race-ethnic groups, however, that lead to different effective environments. We did not include dietary data, for example, in this analysis.
The magnitude of the effect of elevated WBC on MICPT among
Hispanics in our population is probably clinically meaningful. Those in
the highest quartile of WBC had an adjusted increase in plaque
thickness of 0.3 mm compared with those in the lowest quartile. In
the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) in which
measurements were made with a slightly different technique, for every
0.55-mm increase in intima-media thickness of the internal carotid
artery, there was a 30% increase in risk of stroke or myocardial
infarction.30 For those with
an intima-media thickness of
1.81 mm in CHS, the relative risk
of stroke or myocardial infarction was 2.47 (95% CI, 1.59 to 3.85).
The cutoff of 1.81 mm in CHS represented the 80th
percentile and is very similar to the 75th percentile threshold of
MICPT
1.9 mm in our dichotomous model.
Elevated leukocytes may lead to clinical atherosclerotic events either by an effect on chronic atherosclerosis or by inducing acute thrombotic events. Prospective observational studies have found elevations in WBC to be predictive of ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease, perhaps by an effect on plaque rupture.18 24 Data from experimental work on animals and in vitro data show that leukocytes also play an important role in atherogenesis.1 Macrophages and T lymphocytes are prominent in human atheromas, even in the earliest stages of the disease process,31 suggesting that immune processes also may play an initiating or early role in the development of the lesion in human beings. Our data support at least a partial role for leukocytes in the chronic process of atherosclerosis.
It is not known whether this association between relatively elevated leukocyte count and atherosclerosis reflects ongoing chronic subclinical infection. Several observational epidemiological studies,5 6 32 including one in our own population,33 have suggested an association between chronic infection with C pneumoniae and stroke risk. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators4 reported a similar magnitude of association of C pneumoniae IgG antibodies with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis among patients 45 to 64 years of age (adjusted OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.4). Other ways in which leukocytes could affect atherosclerosis include inflammatory mechanisms independent of infection.
Smoking is likely to be a partial confounder in the relationship between WBC and atherosclerosis. We and others have found that current cigarette smoking is associated with WBC34 and subclinical atherosclerosis.16 35 Smoking can increase the mortality from chronic bronchitis36 and possibly other infections.37 Smoking itself may thus be the cause of the increased MICPT, with elevated WBC also resulting from the smoking. We found, however, that there is an increase in MICPT even after adjustment for current smoking among Hispanics. Residual confounding or differential reporting of smoking history dependent on WBC status could mask the effect of smoking on MICPT even among the Hispanic population. Other risk factors are also associated with elevated WBC,35 and could confound the relationship between MICPT and WBC.
Further prospective studies of the relationship between WBC, as well as other inflammatory and infectious markers, and ischemic stroke are needed. Although many studies have investigated the relationship between infection and atherosclerotic heart disease, these may not reflect the relationship between infection and stroke. In northern Manhattan, large-artery atherosclerosis accounts for a minority (only 10% to 20%) of ischemic stroke38 ; embolic and small-vessel causes of stroke are probably more common. Further studies need to take into account the several etiological subtypes of stroke.
Our study has several limitations. Because of our cross-sectional design, we are unable to claim that elevated WBC leads to an increase in plaque thickness. The converse, that participants with greater carotid plaque thickness develop elevated WBC, could just as well be true. The participants in this study were all stroke-free subjects from the community selected at random; thus, it is unlikely that there would be a selection bias for a high incidence of infections. Our study also assesses a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis, MICPT, rather than clinical end points such as myocardial infarction or stroke. Several recent studies, however, have shown that these measures are predictive of clinical ischemic events.30 39 40
Our measurement of MICPT also differs from that used in other studies of carotid wall thickness. For these analyses, we used the maximum thickness of the internal carotid artery plaque. This measurement differs from the measurement of intima-media thickness made in several other studies.4 16 30 40 41 42 We have previously reported on the use of this method and found associations with atherosclerotic risk factors, including age, smoking, hyperglycemia, hypertension, LDL, apoA-I and apoB, consistent with findings in studies using methods which measure intima-media thickness.7 8 Additionally, some30 41 42 have suggested that the common carotid artery wall thickness is the most reliable measurement for studies of preclinical studies of atherosclerosis. Others have shown, however, that internal carotid artery measurements39 or combined measurements of internal and common carotid arteries43 are as reliable and useful in predicting clinical events as are those of the common carotid artery alone. We are currently measuring intima-media thickness at several sites in the common and internal carotid arteries and in the future may have further data on the association of WBC and other risk factors and intima-media thickness, as well as on the relative merits of intima-media thickness and MICPT.
Our study did not provide serological data on infection or data on other markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein or leukocyte adhesion molecules. Further studies are ongoing to determine the association of specific cytokine markers with carotid atherosclerosis in this population. We also did not have data on clinical infection and therefore were unable to make statements about the underlying causes of the elevated WBC. Although this information would be useful, it is difficult to know how to apply it to the development of atherosclerosis. In asymptomatic populations, the role of elevated WBC may be more chronic. Also, it would be useful to know whether the measurements we made of WBC are stable over time. The effect of such measurement bias should be attenuated, however, by the large number of participants enrolled.
It would also be helpful to have data on the leukocyte differentials of the WBC of the subjects. It is unclear whether the elevated risk of MICPT is associated primarily with neutrophils or lymphocytes. Recent evidence suggests that circulating levels of specific white cell types, such as the CD4+CD28null subset of T lymphocytes, may be associated with unstable angina.44 It remains unknown whether circulating levels of specific WBC types might be associated with subclinical atherosclerosis.
In summary, our study supports an association between WBC and carotid atherosclerosis in at least some populations. Evidence from pilot clinical trials in patients with coronary artery disease,45 46 47 as well as animal studies,48 already suggests that the risk of atherosclerotic disease associated with certain infections, such as C pneumoniae, may be modifiable. Corroboration from larger, prospective studies of the role of inflammatory and infectious markers in atherosclerosis and stroke might lead to clinical trials with novel anti-inflammatory or anti-infectious therapies to retard atherosclerosis or prevent incident and recurrent stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 28, 2000; revision received November 16, 2000; accepted December 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. H. Buck, D. S. Liebeskind, J. L. Saver, O. Y. Bang, S. W. Yun, S. Starkman, L. K. Ali, D. Kim, J. P. Villablanca, N. Salamon, et al. Early Neutrophilia Is Associated With Volume of Ischemic Tissue in Acute Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Rodriguez, M. M. Burg, J. Meng, T. G. Pickering, Z. Jin, R. L. Sacco, B. Boden-Albala, S. Homma, and M. R. Di Tullio Effect of Social Support on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping Psychosom Med, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sen, A. Hinderliter, P. K. Sen, J. Simmons, V. A. LeGrys, J. Beck, S. Offenbacher, K. Moss, and S. M. Oppenheimer Association of Leukocyte Count With Progression of Aortic Atheroma in Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack Patients Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2900 - 2905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Godia, R. Madhok, J. Pittman, S. Trocio, R. Ramas, D. Cabral, R. L. Sacco, and T. Rundek Carotid Artery Distensibility: A Reliability Study J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2007; 26(9): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cardellini, M. A. Marini, S. Frontoni, M. L. Hribal, F. Andreozzi, F. Perticone, M. Federici, D. Lauro, and G. Sesti Carotid artery intima-media thickness is associated with insulin-mediated glucose disposal in nondiabetic normotensive offspring of type 2 diabetic patients Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E347 - E352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Prabhakaran, T. Rundek, R. Ramas, M. S.V. Elkind, M. C. Paik, B. Boden-Albala, and R. L. Sacco Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularity Predicts Ischemic Stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2696 - 2701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. V. Elkind, W. Tai, K. Coates, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and outcome after ischemic stroke. Arch Intern Med, October 23, 2006; 166(19): 2073 - 2080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Wright, M. S.V. Elkind, T. Rundek, B. Boden-Albala, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Alcohol Intake, Carotid Plaque, and Cognition: The Northern Manhattan Study Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1160 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nasir, E. Guallar, A. Navas-Acien, M. H. Criqui, and J. A.C. Lima Relationship of Monocyte Count and Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1966 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.S.V. Elkind, R. R. Sciacca, B. Boden-Albala, T. Rundek, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Relative elevation in baseline leukocyte count predicts first cerebral infarction Neurology, June 28, 2005; 64(12): 2121 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Wright, M. C. Paik, T. R. Brown, S. P. Stabler, R. H. Allen, R. L. Sacco, and C. DeCarli Total Homocysteine Is Associated With White Matter Hyperintensity Volume: The Northern Manhattan Study Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1207 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Johnsen, E. Fosse, O. Joakimsen, E. B. Mathiesen, E. Stensland-Bugge, I. Njolstad, and E. Arnesen Monocyte Count Is a Predictor of Novel Plaque Formation: A 7-Year Follow-up Study of 2610 Persons Without Carotid Plaque at Baseline The Tromso Study Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 715 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Engebretson, I. B. Lamster, M. S.V. Elkind, T. Rundek, N. J. Serman, R. T. Demmer, R. L. Sacco, P. N. Papapanou, and M. Desvarieux Radiographic Measures of Chronic Periodontitis and Carotid Artery Plaque Stroke, March 1, 2005; 36(3): 561 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Desvarieux, R. T. Demmer, T. Rundek, B. Boden-Albala, D. R. Jacobs Jr, R. L. Sacco, and P. N. Papapanou Periodontal Microbiota and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: The Oral Infections and Vascular Disease Epidemiology Study (INVEST) Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 576 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |