| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2001;32:993.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From CNS Research, Aventis Pharma, CRVA, Vitry-sur-seine, France.
Correspondence to Dr Véronique Mary, CNS Research, Aventis Pharma, CRVA, Zone D, 13 quai Jules Guesde, 94403 Vitry-sur-seine, France. E-mail veronique.mary{at}aventis.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsIschemia was induced in rats by transient occlusion for 2 hours or by permanent electrocoagulation of the left MCA. Forty-eight hours after ischemia, neurological deficit was evaluated by scoring sensorimotor functions and ischemic damage was quantified by histological evaluation of lesion volumes.
ResultsAfter transient MCAO, enoxaparin at 2x1.5 mg/kg IV (2 and 24 hours after insult) significantly reduced lesion size by 30% (P<0.05) and improved neuroscore (P<0.01). This significant effect on lesion size and neuroscore was still evident when treatment was started 5 hours after insult. Administered under the same protocol with a 5 hours delay post permanent MCAO, enoxaparin reduced lesion size by 49% (P<0.05) and improved neuroscore (P<0.01).
ConclusionsThis study indicates that standard nonhemorrhagic doses of enoxaparin reduce ischemic damage with a wide therapeutic window. In addition to its anticoagulant properties, other properties of enoxaparin could act in synergy to explain its neuroprotective profile in ischemia. Thus clinical application of enoxaparin treatment in stroke warrants serious consideration.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia, focal heparin neuroprotection thrombolytic therapy rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), such as enoxaparin (Lovenox, Clexane), were designed to reduce risk of hemorrhage by modifying the relative activities on key coagulation factors.6 7 Various LMWH and heparinoids have been tested in treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The first nadroparin trial (Fraxiparin International Stroke Study [FISS]) suggested a long-term benefit with LMWH treatment4 8 ; however, in the FISS bis study that followed, nadroparin treatment did not demonstrate an overall benefit on functional recovery or death rate, and bleeding episodes and intracranial hemorrhage increased after treatment.9 More recently, in the Heparin in Acute Embolic Stroke Trial (HAEST), dalteparin did not demonstrate an overall benefit on functional recovery and death rate.10 Finally, the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) indicated that despite an apparent positive response to treatment at 7 days, emergent administration of the antithrombotic agent, ORG 10172, was not associated with an improvement in favorable outcome at 3 months.11 These clinical results do not encourage the use of LMWH for the treatment of stroke, but studies were planned only on the basis of the anticoagulant properties of heparin or LMWH preparation.
Nevertheless, Yanaka et al12 13 have demonstrated that heparin can inhibit leukocyte accumulation in ischemic tissue, reduce the size of infarction, and improve neurological outcome after experimental stroke in rats. That study demonstrates that beyond its anticoagulant activity, non-anticoagulant actions of heparin, including inhibition of leukocyte accumulation (ie, anti-inflammatory effects) could be of interest for stroke treatment. By analogy with the anti-inflammatory effects of heparin, LMWH such as enoxaparin may be of interest in stroke treatment. In particular, in a canine model of myocardial ischemia, enoxaparin inhibited leukocyte infiltration and reduced infarction size.14 Moreover, Pratt et al15 have demonstrated that enoxaparin reduces brain edema provoked by a photothrombosis-induced ischemia in rats, without hemorrhagic side effects. Recently, in a rat model of traumatic brain injury, enoxaparin reduced the cerebral edema and the lesion size and improved the neurological score and the cognitive recovery.16
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of enoxaparin in 2 physiopathologically different models of focal cerebral ischemia in the rat.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transient Middle Cerebral Occlusion
(MCAO)
The left common carotid artery (CCA) was isolated
through a ventral midline neck incision and a loose ligature was placed
around it. The left middle cerebral artery (MCA) was exposed via a
temporal craniectomy.17 A
microsurgical clip (Yasargil, Nemco) was carefully applied to the MCA
proximally to the medial border of the olfactory tract to stop
perfusion via the lenticulostriatal artery, followed by immediate
tightening of CCA ligature. Animals were then removed from
anesthesia and allowed to recover while body temperature
control was maintained. Two hours later, rats were
reanesthetized and cerebral circulation was reestablished by
removing the microclip and loosening the CCA ligature. Restoration of
blood flow in both arteries was verified by observation under a
microscope. The 2 wounds were sutured and animals were returned to
their home cage in a room warmed at 26°C to
28°C.
Permanent Middle Cerebral Occlusion
(pMCAO)
The left MCA was exposed via a temporal
craniectomy.17 The MCA and
its lenticulostriatal branch were occluded proximally to the medial
border of the olfactory tract with microbipolar coagulation (Martin).
The wound was sutured, and animals were returned to their home cage in
a room warmed at 26°C to 28°C.
Neurological Examination
Forty-eight hours after the surgery a
neurological examination was performed blindly by a single examiner.
The grading scale used was modified from the one previously described
by Wahl et al18
(Table 1
).
|
Measurement of Infarction Volume
Forty-eight hours after surgery, rats were killed and
the brains quickly removed. Serial coronal brain sections (1.5-mm
thickness) were prepared and stained with 2% 2,3,5-triphenylterazolium
chloride. After 24 hours of postfixation in a 10% formaldehyde
solution, striatal and cortical areas of infarction were measured with
an image analyzer (Leica). Volumes of infarction were
calculated by integrating injured areas.
Activated Partial Thromboplastin
Time (APTT) Measurement
With the rats under halothane anesthesia,
arterial aortic blood samples were collected in a citrated
tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. The
measurement of APTT was carried out with an ACL Futura photometer on
plasma after activation by ellagic acid and cephalin. Coagulation was
triggered by addition of calcium chloride. The analyzer
detected clot formation by variation in
absorbance.
Drug Treatment
Doses and regimen of administration were chosen
according to the studies of Yanaka et
al.12 13 In all
experiments drugs (dissolved in saline) were administered by
intravenous route (5 mL/kg). Enoxaparin and heparin were
prepared by Aventis laboratory.
Transient MCAO
In the first study (study I), we compared the effect
of both enoxaparin and heparin. Drugs were administered at 1.5 mg/kg 2
and 24 hours after the onset of ischemia. Control rats received
vehicle according to the same protocol.
In a second study (study II), the therapeutic window of opportunity of enoxaparin was explored. Treatment started at 5 hours after ischemia onset, followed by a second administration at 24 hours, as in the first study. This study consisted of a dose-effect of enoxaparin on cerebral lesions. The doses studied were 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg/kg. Control rats received vehicle according to the same protocol.
To complete the previous study, in a third experiment (study III) we studied the effect of enoxaparin administered at 1.5 mg/kg 5 and 24 hours after the onset of ischemia on both functional outcome (neuroscore) and cerebral lesions. Control rats received vehicle according to the same protocol.
Permanent MCAO
In a fourth study (study IV), the neuroprotective
effect of enoxaparin was studied in a model of permanent
ischemia. The same protocol as in transient MCAO was chosen,
with 1.5 mg/kg IV 5 hours and 24 hours after ischemic insult.
Control rats received vehicle according to the same
protocol.
Effect of Enoxaparin on Coagulation
To evaluate the bleeding risk after enoxaparin
treatment (study V), APTT was measured in ischemic rats, after
treatment by enoxaparin at the higher dose used: 1.5 mg/kg, 5 and 24
hours after ischemia onset. APTT was evaluated 10 minutes or 1
hour after the last administration of enoxaparin. Control rats received
saline vehicle according to the same protocol.
Simultaneously, APTT was evaluated in 3 groups of
nonischemic rats receiving enoxaparin or saline according to
the same protocol. Finally, APTT was evaluated in a seventh group of
normal rats.
Expression of Results and Data
Analysis
Values were expressed as mean±SEM. ANOVA followed by
the Student-Newman-Keuls test for comparison between groups was used in
study I. Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric ANOVA
followed by the Dunn test for comparison between groups was used in
studies II and V. The Mann-Whitney test for comparison of 2 groups was
used in studies III and IV. Nonparametric tests were
preferred when variance was not homogenous. Nevertheless, normal
distribution was always confirmed by a normality
test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study I: Heparin Versus Enoxaparin
Administered at 2x1.5 mg/kg IV, enoxaparin
significantly improved the neuroscore 48 hours after ischemia
(P<0.01). In addition,
enoxaparin significantly reduced the cortical lesion by 30%
(P<0.05). Enoxaparin had no
effect on striatal lesion volume
(Figure 1
). At 2x1.5 mg/kg IV, heparin had no significant
effect on the neurological score. Nevertheless, the effect on cortical
lesion was similar to that of enoxaparin (-30%) but nonsignificant
(Figure 1
). Five of 13 rats treated by heparin died 24 hours
after ischemia, and 2 of the remaining 8 animals had notable
evidence of hemorrhage and therefore were excluded from the
final results. No mortality was observed in saline- and
enoxaparin-treated groups, and only 1 of 13 rats died in the
enoxaparin-treated group.
|
Studies II and III: Therapeutic Window and
Dose-Effect of Enoxaparin in Transient MCAO
When administered 5 hours after ischemia
onset, at 2x0.5 mg/kg IV, enoxaparin reduced the volume of the
cortical lesion by 19% but this effect is not statistically
significant. Administered at higher doses (2x1 mg/kg IV and 2x1.5
mg/kg IV), enoxaparin significantly reduced the cortical lesion volume
by 30% and 36%, respectively
(P<0.05 in both cases). At
each dose, enoxaparin had no effect on the striatal lesion volume.
Administered at 2x1.5 mg/kg IV (treatment starting 5 hours after
ischemia), enoxaparin significantly improved the neuroscore
compared with the control group
(P<0.001). In addition,
enoxaparin was still able to reduce significantly the cortical lesion
volume by 34% (P<0.01;
Figure 2
).
|
Study IV: Effect of Enoxaparin in Permanent
Focal Ischemia
Administered at 2x1.5 mg/kg IV (treatment starting 5
hours after ischemia onset), enoxaparin significantly improved
the neuroscore compared with the saline-treated group
(P<0.01) and significantly
reduced the cortical lesion volume by 49%
(P<0.05)
(Figure 3
).
|
Study V: Effect of Enoxaparin on
Coagulation Time
Average APTT times in normal rat plasma samples was
18.8±1.1 seconds (see
Table 3
). No significant differences in APTT were seen
between normal rats and nonischemic saline-treated rats or
lesioned ischemic saline-treated rats. Nevertheless, whatever
the treatment, average APTT values are prolonged by approximately 30%
in ischemic rats versus nonischemic rats. Concerning
the effect of enoxaparin, we observed that (1) in animals sampled 10
minutes after enoxaparin treatment (1.5 mg/kg IV), APTT values were
prolonged by 95% (P<0.01) and
79% (P<0.01) compared with
the saline group for both nonischemic and ischemic
rats, respectively; and (2) in animals sampled 1 hour after enoxaparin
treatment, APTT values were not significantly different from values for
corresponding saline-treated groups for both nonischemic and
ischemic rats.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study I indicates that heparin and enoxaparin administered 2 hours after ischemia onset have the same beneficial effect on cortical lesion size (reduction of 30%). Nevertheless, heparin treatment induces notable mortality and cerebral hemorrhage, which resulted in half of the heparin-treated rats being excluded. This could explain why the effect of heparin did not reach statistical significance. In all studies, enoxaparin did not induce major cerebral hemorrhage. To confirm safety, APTT was measured after treatment with enoxaparin. Small changes in this parameter did not result in any increase in bleed potential. The slight and reversible (in 1 hour) elevation of APTT, in addition to the fact that no macroscopic hemorrhage after enoxaparin treatment was observed in our model, suggest that enoxaparin is neuroprotective at nonhemorrhagic doses. At the same dose, heparin induced such a considerable prolongation of APTT that it could not be measured.
One of the most important and obvious factors to bear in mind when considering acute treatment of stroke is that patients are taken in charge by medical care some hours after they have had their stroke. Thus, studies II and III are important in demonstrating the dose-response to enoxaparin within a 5-hour therapeutic window.
Stroke is a highly variable clinical condition, and in particular, the delay in spontaneous reperfusion is a variant (from hours to days). Therefore, we also evaluated the effect of enoxaparin in a model of permanent ischemia. This study indicates that enoxaparin is still active in a model of ischemia without reperfusion and therefore that this effect is not dependent on reperfusion time, which reinforces the interest of enoxaparin in stroke.
Another important point for public health is that in a large proportion of surviving patients, stroke induces important disability and dependence because of functional impairment. In clinical studies, functional outcome after an ischemic episode is one of the most useful parameters. To provide a more sensitive measure of neuroprotection,19 we associated evaluation of functional outcome (neuroscore) with lesion size. In all cases, enoxaparin provided both infarct reduction and functional improvement. These complementary effects provide another strong argument for a potential activity of enoxaparin in the clinic.
Heparin as well as LMWH have been successfully tested previously in models of cerebral ischemia.12 20 Our study indicates that enoxaparin is also neuroprotective in 2 different models of focal ischemia and, moreover, at a lower dosage (approximately 100 USP total dose) than those used in previous studies.12 20 In addition, the effect is fully maintained with a first administration at 5 hours after ischemia. This supports the hypothesis that enoxaparin has a better efficacy with a better safety margin than some other LMWHs. Why should LMWHs have different biological profiles, since they have some similarities in molecular weight? Chemical studies and investigations, such as NMR spectroscopy, reveal that LMWHs differ in molecular weight mean and distribution, sulfation patterns, and types and quantities of minor residues (for review, see References 21 and 2221 22 ). Moreover, each LMWH has a specific, assay-dependent pharmacokinetic profile23 and a unique biochemical profile,24 which reinforces the concept that each LMWH is a distinct, noninterchangeable pharmaceutical product. These differences may all confer a different pharmacological profile on these LMWHs and therefore modify their biological activities.25
The most well-known activity of enoxaparin is the antithrombotic one. Since in tMCAO model occlusion and reperfusion are mechanically induced and in pMCAO model occlusion is definitive, antithrombotic activity alone cannot explain the neuroprotective effect. Nevertheless, reperfusion of a major feeding artery after transient obstruction has been accompanied by downstream microvascular defects.26 This no-reflow phenomenon may be responsible in part for secondary damage. After experimental ischemia-reperfusion in baboons, microvascular fibrin deposition accumulates in a time-dependent manner during the reperfusion period,27 and elements of a prethrombotic state are present in patients with cerebral ischemia.28 These postreperfusion occlusions may be reduced by preischemia exposure to heparin and ticlopidine in nonhuman primate models of MCA occlusion-reperfusion.29 30 Previous studies have shown that enoxaparin inhibits thrombin generation.31 This suggests that in the brain-injured area, enoxaparin could prevent thrombus formation and restrict thrombus extension. By limiting the fibrin formation, enoxaparin could reduce the secondary microvessel ischemia and thus the associated lesion.
Nevertheless, the neuroprotective effect of enoxaparin seen in our models of permanent and transient cerebral ischemia cannot be exclusively related to its activity on coagulation parameters.
Acute neurodegenerative diseases such as stroke are physiopathological events that initiate a deleterious cascade, which includes, at the least, excitotoxicity, edema, inflammatory processes, oxidative stress, and finally, neuronal cell death, including necrosis and apoptosis (from hours to weeks in duration; for review, see Reference 3232 ). Recent studies indicate that enoxaparin could interfere with this deleterious cascade at various levels.
Excitotoxicity has been widely documented in ischemia and is a relatively transient phenomenon32 33 associated with excessive neuronal depolarization and ionic homeostasis failure, leading to an increase in intracellular Ca2+. In vitro, heparin reduces intracellular Ca2+ release induced by inositol triphosphate system stimulation.34 Treatment of Purkinje cells in guinea pig cerebellar slices by heparin or enoxaparin blocks the glutamate-induced intracellular Ca2+ release.34 Therefore, in our models a possible interaction of enoxaparin with Ca2+ internal stores cannot be excluded.
Inflammatory reaction has also been widely described in experimental stroke. In particular, leukocyte infiltration contributes to tissue injury by inducing lipid peroxidation and release of cytotoxic products (for review, see Reference 3535 ). Adherent neutrophils may also exacerbate cerebral ischemia by participating in the noreflow phenomenon.36 Factor Xa could act as a proinflammatory agent (for review, see Reference 3737 ). Enoxaparin induces a significant and persistent plasma anti-Xa activity. In other hand, P- and L-selectins appear to play a primordial role in ischemia-reperfusion injury by participating in leukocyte infiltration.38 Recent studies show that enoxaparin decreases P-selectin mediating platelet-neutrophil adhesion in plasma in vitro39 and MPO activity (reflecting neutrophil infiltration) in vivo.14 Finally, the complement system has also been implicated in stroke.40 41 Complement inhibition provides neuroprotection in several stroke models.42 43 Both heparin44 and enoxaparin45 inhibit complement pathways of activation (for review, see Reference 4444 ) in vitro, but this effect was not reproduce in any in vivo model.46 All these data support the hypothesis that in our models, enoxaparin could be neuroprotective in part by interfering with the inflammatory process at various levels (eg, neutrophil infiltration,14 complement activation44 45 ).
Free radical production that may damage cells has been widely reported in ischemia-reperfusion injury.47 Antioxidant strategies have been found to be active in experimental models of stroke,48 49 and heparin interferes with reactive oxygen species production (for review, see Reference 4444 ) via reduction of superoxide production,50 and increase of plasma superoxide dismutase in vivo activity.51 Another reactive species, nitric oxide (NO), is thought to be a key actor in the pathophysiology of CNS injuries such as cerebral ischemia.52 Recently, heparin was found to attenuate inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression and NO release after cytokine activation in rat brain microvascular endothelial cells,53 whereas iNOS knockout mice are less susceptible than wild-type mice to ischemic insult.54 Although no results with enoxaparin have been reported, the hypothesis of an interaction between enoxaparin and free radicals could also be considered.
Finally, heparin and heparinoids interact with the heparin-binding growth factor (HBGF) family. These proteins have a high affinity for heparin and heparan sulfate, and it is well known that these growth factors are stabilized by heparin and heparan sulfate.55 Because it has been suggested that some HBGF could play an endogenous neuroprotective function,56 heparin and heparan sulfate may reinforce this endogenous effect. Nevertheless, this effect has not yet been clearly demonstrated in vivo and thus remains a hypothesis.
All these considerations suggest that neuroprotective activity of enoxaparin may be the result of various biological properties acting in synergy.
In conclusion, we found that enoxaparin treatment reduces both cerebral lesions and functional deficit induced by focal cerebral ischemia. We demonstrated that this effect is reproducible in different models of stroke with or without reperfusion and occurs within a large therapeutic window and at nonhemorrhagic dosage. These results, in addition to previous results obtained in photothrombosis15 and TBI,16 strongly suggest that enoxaparin has neuroprotective properties and could be a future treatment for stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 15, 2000; revision received December 19, 2000; accepted December 21, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Cuomo, G. Pignataro, R. Gala, A. Scorziello, E. Gravino, O. Piazza, R. Tufano, G. Di Renzo, and L. Annunziato Antithrombin Reduces Ischemic Volume, Ameliorates Neurologic Deficits, and Prolongs Animal Survival in Both Transient and Permanent Focal Ischemia Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3272 - 3279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-S. Tang, E. Slow, V. Lupu, I. G. Stavrovskaya, M. Sugimori, R. Llinas, B. S. Kristal, M. R. Hayden, and I. Bezprozvanny Disturbed Ca2+ signaling and apoptosis of medium spiny neurons in Huntington's disease PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2602 - 2607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Strater, K. Kurnik, C. Heller, R. Schobess, P. Luigs, and U. Nowak-Gottl Aspirin Versus Low-Dose Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: Antithrombotic Therapy in Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Follow-Up Study Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2554 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |