(Stroke. 2001;32:1127.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Leipzig University Heart Center, Leipzig (R.J.Z., M.M.), and the 2nd Medical Clinic, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz (S.G.-Z., H.D.), Germany.
Correspondence to Rainer J. Zotz, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Schwalmstadt, Krankenhausstr. 27, D-34613 Schwalmstadt, Germany. E-mail rzo{at}schwalm-eder-kliniken.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsWe examined the blood of 13 patients with and 19 without SEC. Blood samples were taken from the femoral vein and artery and from the right and left atria after transseptal puncture. Samples were incubated with fluorescence-labeled antibodies directed against the platelet (CD41a-PE, CD42b-PE, and CD62p-FITC) and leukocyte membrane epitopes (CD45-APC and CD14-FITC). The expressed epitopes were analyzed by dual laser flow cytometry immediately after blood withdrawal.
ResultsIn the peripheral blood of both groups, more activation and aggregation were found in the venous blood than in the arterial blood (CD41a, P=0.007; CD14neutro, P=0.017; and leukocyte-platelet aggregates [LTAg], P=0.002). In patients without SEC, the degree of activation and aggregation of the cardiac samples closely resembled the results of the peripheral samples. The degree of activation and aggregation was significantly higher in the right atrium than in the left atrium (LTAg, P<0.01; leukocyte activation, P<0.01; CD41a, P<0.01; CD62p, P<0.02). In contrast, in patients with SEC the parameters of platelet and leukocyte activation as well as LTAg was significantly higher in the left atrium than in the right atrium of the same patient (all P<0.01). A correlation between the amount of SEC and platelet-monocyte aggregates could be found (r=0.92, P<0.0001).
ConclusionsThe hypothesis that platelet aggregates are involved in the pathogenesis of SEC is supported by the fact that platelets in the left atrium of patients with SEC showed more activation.
Key Words: cardioembolic stroke leukocytes platelet activation spontaneous echo contrast stroke prevention
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SEC is significantly associated with a history of embolism and/or left atrial thrombi detected by echocardiography, severity of mitral stenosis, reduced cardiac index, advanced age, constant atrial fibrillation, hypertension, heart failure, and large left atrial diameter. SEC is a cardiac factor most strongly associated with left atrial appendage thrombus and embolic events. SEC formation is promoted by reduced blood flow velocity and enlarged left atrium but is diminished by mitral regurgitation.1 2 3 4 5
The mechanisms leading to formation of SEC are still under discussion. Blood cell aggregates are thought to be the cause of SEC, although there is disagreement about whether red cell or platelet aggregates cause this phenomenon.
An in vitro ultrasound study by Mahony et al,6 which sought to investigate the relationship between red cell aggregation and whole-blood echogenicity, demonstrated that red blood cell aggregates are not visible on ultrasound at physiological hematocrits. Although warfarin therapy is associated with resolution of left atrial thrombus and a lower risk of thromboembolic events, neither warfarin nor aspirin is effective in suppressing left atrial SEC in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.7
We therefore postulated that platelets and potentially also leukocytes are activated in the left atrium of patients with SEC, which might result in platelet and leukocyte aggregates.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Blood Sampling and Measuring
Blood was drawn from the femoral artery, the
femoral vein (both through a 5F Cordis sheath),
the right atrium immediately before, and the left atrium immediately
after transseptal puncture through the same catheter. The first 10 mL
of blood from each sample was discarded.
Samples were incubated with fluorescence-stained antibodies against the platelet and leukocyte membrane receptors that are known to be activation markers.8 Thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6)stimulated samples served as positive controls; isotypic controls were used for negative control. Blood sample preparation was based on the consensus protocol for flow cytometric analysis of platelet function,9 with slight modifications.10
Antibodies
The following monoclonal antibodies were used in this
study: anti-CD41a (GP IIb/IIIa) and anti-CD42b receptor (GP Ib), both
conjugated with PE, and anti-CD62p (Beckman Coulter), conjugated
with FITC. CD41a or CD42b was used to identify platelets and assess
the degree of platelet activation. Platelet activation was
further measured by expression of CD62p, which is acknowledged to be a
platelet activation
marker.8 Monoclonal
antibodies CD45 (panleukocyte antigen, Medac), conjugated with APC, and
CD14 (LPS-receptor, Becton-Dickinson) conjugated
with FITC, were used for identification of leukocytes as well as to
determine their activation status. A total of 100 µL of the citrated
whole-blood sample was diluted with 900 µL PBS (Sigma Chemical Co);
60 µL of the diluted blood was incubated with 30 µL TRAP-6 for
positive control, and 60 µL was left unstimulated (incubation with 30
µL PBS). The samples were incubated for 10 minutes at room
temperature before they were divided into 2 aliquots: for determination
of the surface density of CD41a (Gp IIb/IIIa) and to measure the
surface density of antigens on leukocytes and their platelet
aggregates, 15 µL of the diluted blood was incubated for 10 minutes
with a cocktail of anti-CD41a-PE, anti-CD14-FITC, and anti-CD45-APC; to
determine the surface density of CD42b receptor (vWF receptor) and
CD62p (P-selectin), 15 µL of the diluted sample was incubated with
anti-CD42b receptor-PE and anti-CD62p-FITC. All antibodies were used in
saturating concentrations. They were titrated under a maximal
stimulated condition (TRAP-6), except for anti-CD42b receptor-PE, which
was titrated with use of unstimulated blood. After incubation with the
antibodies, 0.5 mL refrigerated PBS was added to all samples; the
samples were placed on ice and analyzed immediately afterward.
Fixation of the samples was omitted to avoid fixation artifact, and
freshly stained samples were measured within 30 minutes after
sampling.
Flow Cytometry
Samples were analyzed on a dual laser flow
cytometer (FACScalibur,
Becton-Dickinson). Platelets were detected
in a dot-plot log forward-angle light scatter (forward-angle light
scatter) versus log 90°-angle light scatter (90°-angle light
scatter) and forward-angle light scatter versus log CD41a-PE or CD42b
receptor-PE fluorescence in the orange channel. Forward-angle
light scatter, 90°-angle light scatter, and green (FITC), orange
(PE), and red (APC, excited by the second laser) fluorescence
were acquired on a logarithmic scale. To ensure day-to-day sample
reproducibility, the setup of the flow cytometer was controlled daily
with calibration beads for 488-nm and 630-nm excitation (Spherotech).
When necessary, the instrument was recalibrated. An appropriate
threshold was set in the forward-angle light scatter and the
fluorescence channels to exclude debris and electronic noise.
To exclude red blood cells, a gate was acquired. Fluorescence
compensation was determined by using single-antibody-stained samples.
Cells were measured at a count rate of approximately 5000 events at
low-sample pressure to analyze platelets and at high-sample
pressure for the leukocytes and aggregates (>1000 events per second).
The data were analyzed with the
Cellquest software package (version 3.1f,
Becton-Dickinson). Cell populations were
differentiated as described by our laboratory
before.10
Echocardiography and Video
Intensitometry
Patients were scanned with
transesophageal echocardiography
with a HP Sonus 5500 echocardiograph. The gain settings of
the echocardiograph were identical in all patients and left
unchanged throughout the study. For video intensitometric measurement,
the position of the echoscope was kept constant for 10 seconds. In a
window of measurement (2x2 cm) within the left atrium, the area under
the intensity curve was measured video intensitometrically over 10
seconds from the S-VHS
videotapes.11 Because the
information of the videotape enters the intensitometer directly, no
manipulations can be performed.
In an in vitro model, videointensity was measured over a period of 10 seconds with the transducer held on a water tank containing a monovette. This monovette was filled with 7 mL PBS. Three milliliters of blood were added and stimulated with 5 mL TRAP-6 (to induce aggregates), and 2 mL anti-CD62p were added thereafter. Videointensites were measured before and after the addition of anti-CD62p. This experiment was repeated 8 times, and care was taken that the suspension was standardized by using a vortex machine.
Statistics
For all parameters measured,
fluorescence intensity (mean±SD) was tabulated
(Table 3
). The ratio of left atrial to right atrial
intensity was calculated and plotted as percent. Thus, every patient
served as his or her own control. After the normal distribution of data
had been confirmed with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test, an unpaired
t test was applied to calculate
differences between groups. For comparison between area under the video
intensitometric curve and the amount of platelet-monocyte
aggregates, a linear regression analysis was performed (Graph
Pad Prism, Graph Pad Software
Inc).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with SEC, the activation status of platelets
and leukocytes as well as the degree of aggregates was higher in the
left than in the right atrium of the same individual. Enhanced
platelet activity was measured by increased surface antigen
expression of CD62 (P-selectin) and CD41a (GP IIb/IIIa) and by a
decrease of CD42b (vWF). Increased leukocyte activity was detected by a
rise in leukocyte antigen expression measured in the left atrium
compared with the right atrium. Furthermore, a higher degree of
platelet monocyte aggregation and platelet neutrophil
aggregation were detected as indicators for an enhanced activation
status
(Figure 1
).
|
We found a higher degree of platelet and leukocyte
activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation in venous compared
with arterial blood. Nearly identical values between
femoral and cardiac samples were found in patients without SEC
(Table 3
).
In patients with SEC, the samples of the left atrium showed
a significantly higher degree of platelet-leukocyte activation and
aggregation than did those of the arterial femoral blood
sample. The right atrial sample and the venous femoral sample in
patients with SEC were almost identical
(Table 3
).
A correlation between the video intensitometric amount
of SEC (area under the videointensity curve) and the amount of
platelet-monocyte aggregates could be found
(Figure 2
). In 5 patients treated with tirofiban, only
a slight decrease in videointensity (area under the curve for 10
seconds) could be found (-12±7%).
|
In vitro treatment of blood with TRAP-6 induced aggregates
(Figure 3
). Addition of anti-CD62p led to a significant
reduction of aggregates and video intensitometric indication of
SEC.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies that examined the relationship between SEC and hematological parameters found a positive correlation between the incidence of SEC with fibrinogen level and hematocrit but no correlation with platelet counts.6 Therefore, the hypothesis was raised that left atrial SEC is caused by erythrocyte aggregation. An in vitro ultrasound study12 came to the conclusion that echogenic contrast appears to be primarily caused by the interaction of red blood cells and plasma proteins at low flow and low shear rate conditions. In this study, we did not investigate red blood cells or interactions of red blood cells with leukocytes or other blood components.
Another study13 identified ß-thromboglobulin and von Willebrand factor as the independent associates of left atrial thrombosis, ahead of the presence of SEC, which indicates the participation of platelets in the occurrence of SEC. Hwang et al14 sought to examine a correlation among echocardiographic variables, hematologic parameters, or platelet aggregability and the occurrence of SEC. Platelet aggregability was evaluated by a turbidometric method, using different concentrations of activating agents (adenosine diphosphate and collagen). No significant difference was found in platelet aggregability between patients with left atrial SEC and patients without left atrial SEC who were not receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. These results do not contradict the results of this study, because no direct spontaneous blood activity was measured by using surface receptors on platelets and leukocytes. Furthermore, no direct puncture of the left atrium was performed.
Ileri et al,15 using thrombinantithrombin III complexes and prothrombin fragments 1+2 as in vivo hemostatic markers, obtained results similar to those in this study. They found that there is a hypercoagulable status in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm when SEC is present. Pongratz et al16 investigated the activation status of platelets in the peripheral blood of patients with atrial fibrillation. A significantly higher amount of circulating platelets expressing P-selectin and CD63, and more leukocyte-platelet conjugates were found in patients positive for both SEC and left atrial thrombus or embolic events. An increased spontaneous platelet aggregation in the presence of SEC was described by Rohmann et al,17 who measured the half-maximal formation of platelet aggregates on stimulation with ADP in peripheral blood.
In this study we found a profound increase in left atrial platelet and leukocyte activation in patients with SEC, as indicated by increased surface antigen expression on platelets and leukocytes. Furthermore, as a result of an increased activation status, we found a higher degree of platelet leukocyte aggregation in the left atrium of patients with SEC.
These results support the hypothesis that the origin of SEC is platelet aggregates. The formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates may contribute to further activation of circulating platelets through the release of specific mediator substances (eg, thromboxane A2 or ADP). Activated monocytes produce tissue factor in high quantities, which is the main initiator of the extrinsic coagulation cascade. Therefore, thrombus formation is the likely result that might lead to thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulative therapy with phenprocoumon or warfarin is likely to reduce thrombus formation because of the activated coagulation cascade following tissue factor release from activated monocytes. In addition to the activation of monocytes and the adhesion of activated platelets that we observed, another sequela of platelet activation is the formation of platelet aggregates. These platelet aggregates will not be reduced by oral anticoagulants, which might explain the increased incidence of thromboembolic complications even in the presence of a sufficient anticoagulant therapy.7
It has been demonstrated18 that antiplatelet therapy, but not anticoagulation, is able to reduce platelet-monocyte interaction and consequently reduce the degree of monocyte activation. Therefore, excessive release of tissue factor is prevented, and the initiation of the coagulation cascade via tissue factor is reduced by antiplatelet therapy. Antiplatelet therapy is able to reduce the formation of platelet aggregates, thereby inhibiting the second possible pathway of thrombus formation, as well as the pathway mediated via the coagulation cascade. We conclude that combined antiplatelet therapy, by inhibiting several pathways of platelet activation simultaneously, may aid in the treatment of SEC. Combined antiplatelet therapy inhibits or at least diminishes both pathways of thrombus formation at the same time, whereas oral anticoagulation is able to inhibit only the coagulation cascade leaving activated platelets and the platelet-induced tissue factor unimpaired.
One could argue that the cytometric data of this study do not prove that platelets are a component of SEC and that platelets are a "bystander" of SEC. However, patients with denser SEC did have a greater density of activated platelets. This is a strong argument in favor of the hypothesis of this study.
Limitations
Due to the small sample size of this case-control
study, results need to be confirmed in a larger patient cohort possibly
treated in a randomized fashion with anticoagulants, antiplatelet
drugs, and (if possibly available) a human anti-CD62p. One could argue
that blood withdrawal from the left atrium via a Brockenborough
catheter is a platelet-activating procedure. However, the identical
procedure was performed for blood withdrawal from the right atrium.
Thus, activation via the catheter should have been the same for all
central blood samples. The finding that right atrial and right femoral
activation markers were nearly identical makes an excessive artificial
activation due to the manipulation with the catheter highly unlikely.
This study was performed in patients on therapy; thus, influences of
this therapy cannot completely be ruled out. Also, the number of
patients on therapy at the time of catheterization was
relatively small and not biased in the direction of the results
obtained. A positive control, in which patients on
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were
investigated, was not performed in this study because this therapeutic
modification might cause a substantial bleeding risk in patients
undergoing transseptal puncture for diagnostic reasons.
Other factors that might possibly play a role in this setting, such as
red blood cells, were not analyzed in this
study.
Conclusions
This is the first report to analyze left
atrial blood in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. It
demonstrated a profound increase in the activation status of
platelets and leukocytes compared with right atrial blood. The
amount of SEC correlated with the number of leukocyte-platelet
aggregates. It seems conceivable that instead of conventional
anticoagulation, therapy aimed at the prevention of
platelet-leukocyte activation might be more successful in reducing
the increased incidence of thromboembolic events in this patient
cohort.
Received October 4, 2000; revision received December 15, 2000; accepted January 11, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1994;23:961969.[Abstract]
3. Acar J, Michel PL, Cormier B, Vahanian A, Lung B. Features of patients with severe mitral stenosis with respect to atrial rhythm: atrial fibrillation in predominant and tight mitral stenosis. Acta Cardiol.. 1992;47:115124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Daniel WG, Nellessen U, Schröder E, Nonnast-Daniel B, Bednarski P, Nikutta P, Lichtlen PR. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease: an indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1988;11:12041211.[Abstract]
5.
Chimowitz MI,
DeGeorgia MA, Poole RM, Hepner A, Armstrong WM. Left atrial spontaneous
echo contrast is highly associated with previous stroke in patients
with atrial fibrillation or mitral stenosis.
Stroke.. 1993;24:10151019.
6. Mahony C, Ferguson J, Fischer PL. Red cell aggregation and the echogenicity of whole blood. Ultrasound Med Biol.. 1992;18:579586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Zotz RJ, Pinnau U, Genth S, Erbel R, Meyer J. Left atrial thrombi despite anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. Clin Cardiol. 1994;17:375382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Rinder HM,
Bonan JL, Rinder CS, Ault KA, Smith BR. Activated and
unactivated platelet adhesion to monocytes and neutrophils.
Blood.. 1991;78:17601769.
9. Schmitz G, Rothe G, Ruf A, Barlage S, Tschöpe D, Clemetson KJ, Goodall AH, Michelson AD, Nurden AT, Shankey TV. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis: consensus protocol for the flow cytometric characterization of platelet function. Thromb Haemost.. 1998;79:885896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Tarnok A, Mahnke A, Müller M, Zotz RJ. Rapid in vitro biocompatibility assay of endovascular stents by flow cytometry using platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation. Cytometry.. 1999;38:3039.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Zotz RJ, Erbel R, Philipp A, Judt A, Wagner H, Lauterborn W, Meyer J. High-speed rotational angioplasty-induced echo contrast in vivo and in vitro optical analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.. 1992;26:98109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Merino A, Hauptman P, Badimon L, Cohen M, Fuster V, Goldman M. Echocardiographic smoke is produced by an interaction of erythrocytes and plasma proteins modulated by shear forces. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1992;20:16611668.[Abstract]
13.
Heppell RM,
Berkin KE, McLenachan JM, Davies JA. Haemostatic and haemodynamic
abnormalities associated with left atrial thrombosis in non-rheumatic
atrial fibrillation [see comments].
Heart.. 1997;77:407411.
14. Hwang JJ, Ko FN, Li YH, Ma HM, Wu GJ, Chang H, Wang SM, Schie JT, Tseng YZ, Kuan P. Clinical implications and factors related to left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiology.. 1994;85:6975.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ileri M, Buyukasik Y, Ileri NS, Haznedaroglu IC, Güksel S, Kirazli S, Dundar S. Activation of blood coagulation in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol.. 1998;81:795797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Pongratz G,
Brandt-Pohlmann M, Henneke KH, Pohle C, Zink D, Gehling G, Bachmann K.
Platelet activation in embolic and preembolic status of patients
with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.
Chest.. 1997;111:929933.
17. Rohmann S, Erbel R, Darius H, Makowski T, Jensen P, Fischer T, Meyer J. Spontaneous echo contrast imaging in infective endocarditis: a predictor of complications? Int J Card Imaging.. 1992;8:197207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
May AE,
Neumann FJ, Gawaz M, Ott I, Walter H, Schömig A. Reduction of
monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte activation in patients
receiving antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent
implantation. Eur Heart J.. 1997;18:19131820.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G Uzlova, K. G Guria, and G. T. Guria Acoustic determination of early stages of intravascular blood coagulation Phil Trans R Soc A, October 13, 2008; 366(1880): 3649 - 3661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Onozuka, M. Muraki, T. Mikami, T. Yoshimoto, T. Yoshizumi, M. Kitaguchi, T. Sugawara, K. Tokuda, S. Kaneko, T. Kashiwaba, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Importance of Spontaneous Echo Contrast Within the Carotid Artery in Patients With Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2007; 26(2): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rastegar, D. J. Harnick, P. Weidemann, V. Fuster, B. Coller, J. J. Badimon, J. Chesebro, and M. E. Goldman Spontaneous echo contrast videodensity isflow-related and is dependent on the relative concentrations of fibrinogen and red blood cells J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 603 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |