Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:1127-1133

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zotz, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Darius, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zotz, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Darius, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Antiplatelets
Right arrow Signal transduction
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Stroke. 2001;32:1127.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Spontaneous Echo Contrast Caused by Platelet and Leukocyte Aggregates?

Rainer J. Zotz, MD; Matthias Müller, MD; Sabine Genth-Zotz, MD Harald Darius, MD

From the Leipzig University Heart Center, Leipzig (R.J.Z., M.M.), and the 2nd Medical Clinic, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz (S.G.-Z., H.D.), Germany.

Correspondence to Rainer J. Zotz, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Schwalmstadt, Krankenhausstr. 27, D-34613 Schwalmstadt, Germany. E-mail rzo{at}schwalm-eder-kliniken.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose—Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) is correlated to clinical thromboembolic events. We sought to determine the origin of SEC by utilizing direct analysis of left atrial blood.

Methods—We examined the blood of 13 patients with and 19 without SEC. Blood samples were taken from the femoral vein and artery and from the right and left atria after transseptal puncture. Samples were incubated with fluorescence-labeled antibodies directed against the platelet (CD41a-PE, CD42b-PE, and CD62p-FITC) and leukocyte membrane epitopes (CD45-APC and CD14-FITC). The expressed epitopes were analyzed by dual laser flow cytometry immediately after blood withdrawal.

Results—In the peripheral blood of both groups, more activation and aggregation were found in the venous blood than in the arterial blood (CD41a, P=0.007; CD14neutro, P=0.017; and leukocyte-platelet aggregates [LTAg], P=0.002). In patients without SEC, the degree of activation and aggregation of the cardiac samples closely resembled the results of the peripheral samples. The degree of activation and aggregation was significantly higher in the right atrium than in the left atrium (LTAg, P<0.01; leukocyte activation, P<0.01; CD41a, P<0.01; CD62p, P<0.02). In contrast, in patients with SEC the parameters of platelet and leukocyte activation as well as LTAg was significantly higher in the left atrium than in the right atrium of the same patient (all P<0.01). A correlation between the amount of SEC and platelet-monocyte aggregates could be found (r=0.92, P<0.0001).

Conclusions—The hypothesis that platelet aggregates are involved in the pathogenesis of SEC is supported by the fact that platelets in the left atrium of patients with SEC showed more activation.


Key Words: cardioembolic stroke • leukocytes • platelet activation • spontaneous echo contrast • stroke prevention


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) is a smokelike echo phenomenon with a swirling pattern of blood flow that can be observed in transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography, most often within the left atrium.

SEC is significantly associated with a history of embolism and/or left atrial thrombi detected by echocardiography, severity of mitral stenosis, reduced cardiac index, advanced age, constant atrial fibrillation, hypertension, heart failure, and large left atrial diameter. SEC is a cardiac factor most strongly associated with left atrial appendage thrombus and embolic events. SEC formation is promoted by reduced blood flow velocity and enlarged left atrium but is diminished by mitral regurgitation.1 2 3 4 5

The mechanisms leading to formation of SEC are still under discussion. Blood cell aggregates are thought to be the cause of SEC, although there is disagreement about whether red cell or platelet aggregates cause this phenomenon.

An in vitro ultrasound study by Mahony et al,6 which sought to investigate the relationship between red cell aggregation and whole-blood echogenicity, demonstrated that red blood cell aggregates are not visible on ultrasound at physiological hematocrits. Although warfarin therapy is associated with resolution of left atrial thrombus and a lower risk of thromboembolic events, neither warfarin nor aspirin is effective in suppressing left atrial SEC in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.7

We therefore postulated that platelets and potentially also leukocytes are activated in the left atrium of patients with SEC, which might result in platelet and leukocyte aggregates.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Leipzig University. After informed consent, 32 patients who underwent transseptal cardiac catheterization for clinical reasons were classified into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of SEC. Group I comprised 12 patients with mitral stenosis and 1 with atrial septal defect (n=13); group II, 12 patients with aortic stenosis, 5 with atrial septal defect type II, and 2 with mitral regurgitation (n=19). The presence or absence of SEC was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. Group II patients without SEC served as controls. Patient characteristics and concomitant medications are shown in Tables 1Down and 2Down. Heparin therapy was discontinued 6 hours before catheterization so that at the time of catheterization no prolongation of the partial thromboplastin time was observed. No patient showed right-heart SEC. Five additional patients with SEC were treated with 50 mg tirofiban intravenously over 5 minutes during transesophageal echocardiography.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients With SEC


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of Patients Without SEC

Blood Sampling and Measuring
Blood was drawn from the femoral artery, the femoral vein (both through a 5F Cordis sheath), the right atrium immediately before, and the left atrium immediately after transseptal puncture through the same catheter. The first 10 mL of blood from each sample was discarded.

Samples were incubated with fluorescence-stained antibodies against the platelet and leukocyte membrane receptors that are known to be activation markers.8 Thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6)–stimulated samples served as positive controls; isotypic controls were used for negative control. Blood sample preparation was based on the consensus protocol for flow cytometric analysis of platelet function,9 with slight modifications.10

Antibodies
The following monoclonal antibodies were used in this study: anti-CD41a (GP IIb/IIIa) and anti-CD42b receptor (GP Ib), both conjugated with PE, and anti-CD62p (Beckman Coulter), conjugated with FITC. CD41a or CD42b was used to identify platelets and assess the degree of platelet activation. Platelet activation was further measured by expression of CD62p, which is acknowledged to be a platelet activation marker.8 Monoclonal antibodies CD45 (panleukocyte antigen, Medac), conjugated with APC, and CD14 (LPS-receptor, Becton-Dickinson) conjugated with FITC, were used for identification of leukocytes as well as to determine their activation status. A total of 100 µL of the citrated whole-blood sample was diluted with 900 µL PBS (Sigma Chemical Co); 60 µL of the diluted blood was incubated with 30 µL TRAP-6 for positive control, and 60 µL was left unstimulated (incubation with 30 µL PBS). The samples were incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature before they were divided into 2 aliquots: for determination of the surface density of CD41a (Gp IIb/IIIa) and to measure the surface density of antigens on leukocytes and their platelet aggregates, 15 µL of the diluted blood was incubated for 10 minutes with a cocktail of anti-CD41a-PE, anti-CD14-FITC, and anti-CD45-APC; to determine the surface density of CD42b receptor (vWF receptor) and CD62p (P-selectin), 15 µL of the diluted sample was incubated with anti-CD42b receptor-PE and anti-CD62p-FITC. All antibodies were used in saturating concentrations. They were titrated under a maximal stimulated condition (TRAP-6), except for anti-CD42b receptor-PE, which was titrated with use of unstimulated blood. After incubation with the antibodies, 0.5 mL refrigerated PBS was added to all samples; the samples were placed on ice and analyzed immediately afterward. Fixation of the samples was omitted to avoid fixation artifact, and freshly stained samples were measured within 30 minutes after sampling.

Flow Cytometry
Samples were analyzed on a dual laser flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton-Dickinson). Platelets were detected in a dot-plot log forward-angle light scatter (forward-angle light scatter) versus log 90°-angle light scatter (90°-angle light scatter) and forward-angle light scatter versus log CD41a-PE or CD42b receptor-PE fluorescence in the orange channel. Forward-angle light scatter, 90°-angle light scatter, and green (FITC), orange (PE), and red (APC, excited by the second laser) fluorescence were acquired on a logarithmic scale. To ensure day-to-day sample reproducibility, the setup of the flow cytometer was controlled daily with calibration beads for 488-nm and 630-nm excitation (Spherotech). When necessary, the instrument was recalibrated. An appropriate threshold was set in the forward-angle light scatter and the fluorescence channels to exclude debris and electronic noise. To exclude red blood cells, a gate was acquired. Fluorescence compensation was determined by using single-antibody-stained samples. Cells were measured at a count rate of approximately 5000 events at low-sample pressure to analyze platelets and at high-sample pressure for the leukocytes and aggregates (>1000 events per second). The data were analyzed with the Cellquest software package (version 3.1f, Becton-Dickinson). Cell populations were differentiated as described by our laboratory before.10

Echocardiography and Video Intensitometry
Patients were scanned with transesophageal echocardiography with a HP Sonus 5500 echocardiograph. The gain settings of the echocardiograph were identical in all patients and left unchanged throughout the study. For video intensitometric measurement, the position of the echoscope was kept constant for 10 seconds. In a window of measurement (2x2 cm) within the left atrium, the area under the intensity curve was measured video intensitometrically over 10 seconds from the S-VHS videotapes.11 Because the information of the videotape enters the intensitometer directly, no manipulations can be performed.

In an in vitro model, videointensity was measured over a period of 10 seconds with the transducer held on a water tank containing a monovette. This monovette was filled with 7 mL PBS. Three milliliters of blood were added and stimulated with 5 mL TRAP-6 (to induce aggregates), and 2 mL anti-CD62p were added thereafter. Videointensites were measured before and after the addition of anti-CD62p. This experiment was repeated 8 times, and care was taken that the suspension was standardized by using a vortex machine.

Statistics
For all parameters measured, fluorescence intensity (mean±SD) was tabulated (Table 3Down). The ratio of left atrial to right atrial intensity was calculated and plotted as percent. Thus, every patient served as his or her own control. After the normal distribution of data had been confirmed with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test, an unpaired t test was applied to calculate differences between groups. For comparison between area under the video intensitometric curve and the amount of platelet-monocyte aggregates, a linear regression analysis was performed (Graph Pad Prism, Graph Pad Software Inc).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Cytometry Results: Platelet Activation and Leukocyte Activation (Median Fluorescence Intensity) and Platelet-Leukocyte Aggregates (% of Aggregates)


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of this case control study relating to surface antigen expression on platelets and leukocytes as well as to platelet-leukocyte aggregates in the right and left atria are shown in Table 3Up.

In patients with SEC, the activation status of platelets and leukocytes as well as the degree of aggregates was higher in the left than in the right atrium of the same individual. Enhanced platelet activity was measured by increased surface antigen expression of CD62 (P-selectin) and CD41a (GP IIb/IIIa) and by a decrease of CD42b (vWF). Increased leukocyte activity was detected by a rise in leukocyte antigen expression measured in the left atrium compared with the right atrium. Furthermore, a higher degree of platelet monocyte aggregation and platelet neutrophil aggregation were detected as indicators for an enhanced activation status (Figure 1Down).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Ratio of LA/RA findings (%) in patients with and without spontaneous echo contrast: CD62p, CD42b, CD41a, CD41a in aggregates, monocyte-platelet aggregates, neutrophil-platelet aggregates, CD45 on monocytes, CD45 on neutrophils, CD14 on monocytes, CD14 on neutrophils, monocyte-platelet aggregates, neutrophil-platelet aggregates, CD45 on monocytes, CD45 on neutrophils.

We found a higher degree of platelet and leukocyte activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation in venous compared with arterial blood. Nearly identical values between femoral and cardiac samples were found in patients without SEC (Table 3Up).

In patients with SEC, the samples of the left atrium showed a significantly higher degree of platelet-leukocyte activation and aggregation than did those of the arterial femoral blood sample. The right atrial sample and the venous femoral sample in patients with SEC were almost identical (Table 3Up).

A correlation between the video intensitometric amount of SEC (area under the videointensity curve) and the amount of platelet-monocyte aggregates could be found (Figure 2Down). In 5 patients treated with tirofiban, only a slight decrease in videointensity (area under the curve for 10 seconds) could be found (-12±7%).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Linear regression between monocyte-platelet aggregates (%) and area under echocardiographic video intensitometric curve (standardized acquisition and analysis).

In vitro treatment of blood with TRAP-6 induced aggregates (Figure 3Down). Addition of anti-CD62p led to a significant reduction of aggregates and video intensitometric indication of SEC.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Lymphocyte-, neutrophil-, and monocyte-platelet aggregates (produced by stimulation with TRAP-6) before and after in vitro treatment with anti-CD62p and their respective videointensities in vitro.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study we found a higher degree of platelet and leukocyte activation as well as platelet-leukocyte aggregation in venous blood. This can be explained by the lower flow rate in the venous system and might be one reason for the higher incidence of thrombosis within the venous system compared with the arterial system. In addition, the lung acting as a microfilter clears potential aggregates and releases potent mediator substances such as NO and PGI2, which might lead to a lower number of aggregates in the arterial system.

Studies that examined the relationship between SEC and hematological parameters found a positive correlation between the incidence of SEC with fibrinogen level and hematocrit but no correlation with platelet counts.6 Therefore, the hypothesis was raised that left atrial SEC is caused by erythrocyte aggregation. An in vitro ultrasound study12 came to the conclusion that echogenic contrast appears to be primarily caused by the interaction of red blood cells and plasma proteins at low flow and low shear rate conditions. In this study, we did not investigate red blood cells or interactions of red blood cells with leukocytes or other blood components.

Another study13 identified ß-thromboglobulin and von Willebrand factor as the independent associates of left atrial thrombosis, ahead of the presence of SEC, which indicates the participation of platelets in the occurrence of SEC. Hwang et al14 sought to examine a correlation among echocardiographic variables, hematologic parameters, or platelet aggregability and the occurrence of SEC. Platelet aggregability was evaluated by a turbidometric method, using different concentrations of activating agents (adenosine diphosphate and collagen). No significant difference was found in platelet aggregability between patients with left atrial SEC and patients without left atrial SEC who were not receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. These results do not contradict the results of this study, because no direct spontaneous blood activity was measured by using surface receptors on platelets and leukocytes. Furthermore, no direct puncture of the left atrium was performed.

Ileri et al,15 using thrombin–antithrombin III complexes and prothrombin fragments 1+2 as in vivo hemostatic markers, obtained results similar to those in this study. They found that there is a hypercoagulable status in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm when SEC is present. Pongratz et al16 investigated the activation status of platelets in the peripheral blood of patients with atrial fibrillation. A significantly higher amount of circulating platelets expressing P-selectin and CD63, and more leukocyte-platelet conjugates were found in patients positive for both SEC and left atrial thrombus or embolic events. An increased spontaneous platelet aggregation in the presence of SEC was described by Rohmann et al,17 who measured the half-maximal formation of platelet aggregates on stimulation with ADP in peripheral blood.

In this study we found a profound increase in left atrial platelet and leukocyte activation in patients with SEC, as indicated by increased surface antigen expression on platelets and leukocytes. Furthermore, as a result of an increased activation status, we found a higher degree of platelet leukocyte aggregation in the left atrium of patients with SEC.

These results support the hypothesis that the origin of SEC is platelet aggregates. The formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates may contribute to further activation of circulating platelets through the release of specific mediator substances (eg, thromboxane A2 or ADP). Activated monocytes produce tissue factor in high quantities, which is the main initiator of the extrinsic coagulation cascade. Therefore, thrombus formation is the likely result that might lead to thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulative therapy with phenprocoumon or warfarin is likely to reduce thrombus formation because of the activated coagulation cascade following tissue factor release from activated monocytes. In addition to the activation of monocytes and the adhesion of activated platelets that we observed, another sequela of platelet activation is the formation of platelet aggregates. These platelet aggregates will not be reduced by oral anticoagulants, which might explain the increased incidence of thromboembolic complications even in the presence of a sufficient anticoagulant therapy.7

It has been demonstrated18 that antiplatelet therapy, but not anticoagulation, is able to reduce platelet-monocyte interaction and consequently reduce the degree of monocyte activation. Therefore, excessive release of tissue factor is prevented, and the initiation of the coagulation cascade via tissue factor is reduced by antiplatelet therapy. Antiplatelet therapy is able to reduce the formation of platelet aggregates, thereby inhibiting the second possible pathway of thrombus formation, as well as the pathway mediated via the coagulation cascade. We conclude that combined antiplatelet therapy, by inhibiting several pathways of platelet activation simultaneously, may aid in the treatment of SEC. Combined antiplatelet therapy inhibits or at least diminishes both pathways of thrombus formation at the same time, whereas oral anticoagulation is able to inhibit only the coagulation cascade leaving activated platelets and the platelet-induced tissue factor unimpaired.

One could argue that the cytometric data of this study do not prove that platelets are a component of SEC and that platelets are a "bystander" of SEC. However, patients with denser SEC did have a greater density of activated platelets. This is a strong argument in favor of the hypothesis of this study.

Limitations
Due to the small sample size of this case-control study, results need to be confirmed in a larger patient cohort possibly treated in a randomized fashion with anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and (if possibly available) a human anti-CD62p. One could argue that blood withdrawal from the left atrium via a Brockenborough catheter is a platelet-activating procedure. However, the identical procedure was performed for blood withdrawal from the right atrium. Thus, activation via the catheter should have been the same for all central blood samples. The finding that right atrial and right femoral activation markers were nearly identical makes an excessive artificial activation due to the manipulation with the catheter highly unlikely. This study was performed in patients on therapy; thus, influences of this therapy cannot completely be ruled out. Also, the number of patients on therapy at the time of catheterization was relatively small and not biased in the direction of the results obtained. A positive control, in which patients on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were investigated, was not performed in this study because this therapeutic modification might cause a substantial bleeding risk in patients undergoing transseptal puncture for diagnostic reasons. Other factors that might possibly play a role in this setting, such as red blood cells, were not analyzed in this study.

Conclusions
This is the first report to analyze left atrial blood in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. It demonstrated a profound increase in the activation status of platelets and leukocytes compared with right atrial blood. The amount of SEC correlated with the number of leukocyte-platelet aggregates. It seems conceivable that instead of conventional anticoagulation, therapy aimed at the prevention of platelet-leukocyte activation might be more successful in reducing the increased incidence of thromboembolic events in this patient cohort.

Received October 4, 2000; revision received December 15, 2000; accepted January 11, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. ELAT Study (Embolism in Left Atrial Thrombi): baseline clinical and echocardiographic data. Cardiology. 1995;86:457–463.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1994;23:961–969.[Abstract]
  3. Acar J, Michel PL, Cormier B, Vahanian A, Lung B. Features of patients with severe mitral stenosis with respect to atrial rhythm: atrial fibrillation in predominant and tight mitral stenosis. Acta Cardiol.. 1992;47:115–124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Daniel WG, Nellessen U, Schröder E, Nonnast-Daniel B, Bednarski P, Nikutta P, Lichtlen PR. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease: an indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1988;11:1204–1211.[Abstract]
  5. Chimowitz MI, DeGeorgia MA, Poole RM, Hepner A, Armstrong WM. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is highly associated with previous stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or mitral stenosis. Stroke.. 1993;24:1015–1019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Mahony C, Ferguson J, Fischer PL. Red cell aggregation and the echogenicity of whole blood. Ultrasound Med Biol.. 1992;18:579–586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Zotz RJ, Pinnau U, Genth S, Erbel R, Meyer J. Left atrial thrombi despite anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. Clin Cardiol. 1994;17:375–382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Rinder HM, Bonan JL, Rinder CS, Ault KA, Smith BR. Activated and unactivated platelet adhesion to monocytes and neutrophils. Blood.. 1991;78:1760–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schmitz G, Rothe G, Ruf A, Barlage S, Tschöpe D, Clemetson KJ, Goodall AH, Michelson AD, Nurden AT, Shankey TV. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis: consensus protocol for the flow cytometric characterization of platelet function. Thromb Haemost.. 1998;79:885–896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Tarnok A, Mahnke A, Müller M, Zotz RJ. Rapid in vitro biocompatibility assay of endovascular stents by flow cytometry using platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation. Cytometry.. 1999;38:30–39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Zotz RJ, Erbel R, Philipp A, Judt A, Wagner H, Lauterborn W, Meyer J. High-speed rotational angioplasty-induced echo contrast in vivo and in vitro optical analysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.. 1992;26:98–109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Merino A, Hauptman P, Badimon L, Cohen M, Fuster V, Goldman M. Echocardiographic smoke is produced by an interaction of erythrocytes and plasma proteins modulated by shear forces. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1992;20:1661–1668.[Abstract]
  13. Heppell RM, Berkin KE, McLenachan JM, Davies JA. Haemostatic and haemodynamic abnormalities associated with left atrial thrombosis in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation [see comments]. Heart.. 1997;77:407–411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hwang JJ, Ko FN, Li YH, Ma HM, Wu GJ, Chang H, Wang SM, Schie JT, Tseng YZ, Kuan P. Clinical implications and factors related to left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiology.. 1994;85:69–75.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ileri M, Buyukasik Y, Ileri NS, Haznedaroglu IC, Güksel S, Kirazli S, Dundar S. Activation of blood coagulation in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol.. 1998;81:795–797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Pongratz G, Brandt-Pohlmann M, Henneke KH, Pohle C, Zink D, Gehling G, Bachmann K. Platelet activation in embolic and preembolic status of patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Chest.. 1997;111:929–933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Rohmann S, Erbel R, Darius H, Makowski T, Jensen P, Fischer T, Meyer J. Spontaneous echo contrast imaging in infective endocarditis: a predictor of complications? Int J Card Imaging.. 1992;8:197–207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. May AE, Neumann FJ, Gawaz M, Ott I, Walter H, Schömig A. Reduction of monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte activation in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. Eur Heart J.. 1997;18:1913–1820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Onozuka, M. Muraki, T. Mikami, T. Yoshimoto, T. Yoshizumi, M. Kitaguchi, T. Sugawara, K. Tokuda, S. Kaneko, T. Kashiwaba, et al.
Prevalence and Clinical Importance of Spontaneous Echo Contrast Within the Carotid Artery in Patients With Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2007; 26(2): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Rastegar, D. J. Harnick, P. Weidemann, V. Fuster, B. Coller, J. J. Badimon, J. Chesebro, and M. E. Goldman
Spontaneous echo contrast videodensity isflow-related and is dependent on the relative concentrations of fibrinogen and red blood cells
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 603 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zotz, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Darius, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zotz, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Darius, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Antiplatelets
Right arrow Signal transduction
Right arrow Echocardiography