(Stroke. 2001;32:1525.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Sex Differences in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy and the Distribution of Atherosclerotic Plaque
From the Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, England.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose—Plaque formation at arterial bifurcations depends on vessel anatomy, particularly the relative sizes of the branches, and the ratio of the outflow to inflow area. The facts that carotid plaque is more common in men and that carotid bruits in the absence of stenosis are more frequent in women raise the possibility that there are sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy. We studied 5395 angiograms from the European Carotid Surgery Trial.
Methods—To minimize
secondary changes we excluded angiograms with 
50% stenosis
and also studied vessels with no disease. We measured
arterial diameters at disease-free points and calculated
the following ratios: internal/common (ICA/CCA); external/common
(ECA/CCA); internal/external (ICA/ECA) carotid arteries; carotid
bulb/CCA; and outflow/inflow area. We related these to sex and also
studied the distribution of plaque in the whole trial
population.
Results—Among 2930 angiograms with <50% stenosis, the mean ICA/CCA ratio, ICA/ECA ratio, and outflow/inflow area ratio were larger in women than in men (all P<0.0001). The findings were similar in 622 bifurcations without atheroma. There were also differences in the distribution of plaque, with men more likely to have the maximum stenosis distal to the carotid bulb (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.01; P=0.001) and women more likely to have stenosis of the ECA (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.85; P<0.0001).
Conclusions—Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy are not limited to absolute vessel size. In addition, the outflow to inflow area ratio is bigger in women, and relative to the CCA and ECA, women have larger ICAs than men. Irrespective of whether these differences are congenital or acquired, they may partly explain the sex differences that we found in the distribution of plaque and the sex differences in the prevalence of carotid atheroma in the general population.
Key Words: anatomy • angiography • carotid arteries • gender
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The carotid bifurcation is one of the most common sites of atherosclerotic plaque.1 2 Plaque formation is thought to originate from endothelial damage caused by disturbances in local blood flow,3 which are influenced by bifurcation anatomy.4 5 Previous studies have suggested that the outflow to inflow area ratio, ie, the ratio of the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the branches divided by the cross-sectional area of the parent vessel, plays an important part in plaque formation.6 7 The area ratio influences the amount of reflection of a pulse wave arriving at a bifurcation. Low ratios (ie, a relatively small outflow to inflow area) result in loss of flow energy, increasing local stress, and endothelial damage due to increasing reflection of the pulse wave. A study of 6 patients with premature atheromatous disease of the aortic bifurcation reported an association between a small ilioaortic area ratio and the presence of premature atheromatous disease.8 A small postmortem study found that patients with carotid atheroma tended to have a smaller outflow to inflow area ratio at the carotid bifurcation than patients with no evidence of disease.9
If plaque formation is partly determined by bifurcation anatomy, variation in bifurcation anatomy could partly explain differences in the prevalence of carotid plaque. For example, population studies have shown that carotid atheroma is more prevalent in men.10 11 12 This is thought to be partly due to differences in sex hormone levels and differences between men and women in the prevalence of other vascular risk factors,13 14 but sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy could also partly account for sex differences in the prevalence of carotid atheroma. However, there has been little investigation of variation in bifurcation anatomy with sex. The only differences described are that men tend to have larger vessels with thicker walls.15 16 Only one study has examined differences in the relative sizes of the branches of the bifurcation.16 It included 61 patients (35 men, 26 women) and found no variations of the vessel diameter ratios with sex. However, because of the small number of patients it lacked the statistical power to exclude moderate differences, and it did not examine the outflow to inflow area ratio. To our knowledge there has been no large study of sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy.
Our aim was to determine the extent of any sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy by reviewing the 5395 angiograms from the 2168 men and 850 women in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST).15 Given the possible importance of relative vessel sizes in the development of disease, we determined the vessel diameter and area ratios of the main branches of the carotid bifurcation. We also studied sex differences in the distribution of atherosclerotic plaque. The large number of patients provided considerable statistical power. All patients in the trial underwent angiography, permitting accurate measurement of the vessel dimensions. Detailed baseline clinical data were collected on each patient, allowing analysis of other possible influences on vessel anatomy.
|
Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
We studied the carotid angiograms of patients randomized in the ECST. The methods and results of the trial and the details of the angiographic technique have been published previously.17 18 Briefly, patients with recent ocular or carotid territory cerebral ischemia, who had evidence of carotid stenosis on an angiogram, were randomized to carotid endarterectomy and best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone. Baseline clinical data were recorded and patients followed-up by a physician at 4 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Of 3018 patients randomized in the trial, 3007 (99.6%) had angiograms of the symptomatic carotid artery, and 2388 (79.4%) had contralateral carotid angiograms available for study.
Selection of Angiograms
All the patients included in the ECST had some
atheromatous disease in at least 1 carotid artery.
Severe atheromatous disease can lead to secondary
changes in anatomy. For example, blood pressure and blood flow
decrease beyond a stenosis of
80%,19 20 21
and the internal carotid artery narrows distal to a stenosis of
70%.22 In contrast,
changes in blood flow or pressure do not occur distal to lesions of
<50%, and there is no poststenotic
narrowing.19 20 21 22
To minimize the secondary effects of atheromatous
disease, we therefore excluded patients with 50% stenosis of
the internal (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA) (ECST criteria). The
reproducibility of this measurement and its equivalence with other
methods have been reported
previously.23 24
Angiograms were obtained at many different centers. Consequently, projection angles, magnification factors, type of angiography, and image quality were not standardized. To examine the possibility that apparent sex differences in bifurcation anatomy might be caused by differences between men and women in the acquisition and quality of the angiograms, we compared the following categories between sexes: angiographic view (lateral, oblique, anterior); number of views available; method of image acquisition (conventional, digital); angiographic technique (selective, aortic arch injection, intravenous injection in <3% of patients); and image quality (good, adequate, poor).
Assessment of Bifurcation Anatomy
Because of their potential importance in the
development of atheroma, we studied the vessel diameter and
area ratios. Use of ratios eliminated the magnification factor of the
angiograms and, if we assume that the blood vessel cross sections were
approximately circular, produced results that were independent of the
projection angle. Use of vessel ratios therefore enabled us to
compare nonstandardized angiograms from different centers.
We studied the relative sizes of the CCA, ICA, and external
carotid arteries (ECA) and of the carotid bulb. The diameter of the ICA
was measured distal to the bulb at a disease-free section where the
walls were parallel. The diameters of the other arteries were also
measured at representative, disease-free sections with
parallel walls
(Figure 1
). In patients with atheroma, the
diameter of the carotid bulb had to be estimated because plaque was
most frequently located here and obscured the outline of the vessel
wall. Measurements were made by a single observer (P.M.R.) on all
available angiograms of symptomatic and contralateral
carotid arteries. All measurements were made with a jeweler’s eyepiece
graduated in tenths of millimeters on the single angiographic film that
showed the maximum stenosis. We recorded whether this was a
lateral, anteroposterior, or oblique view. The symptomatic
side was defined as described
previously.17
|
Since apparent variation in the vessel dimensions could result from poor measurement technique, we assessed the reproducibility of angiographic measurements. We selected the ICA/CCA ratio as a representative measurement. Intraobserver agreement was assessed on 100 randomly selected angiograms (P.M.R.) measured 1 month apart, and a second independent observer measured the ICA/CCA ratio on a consecutive series of 976 of the study angiograms to determine interobserver agreement.
We calculated the ratios of the diameters of the ICA to CCA,
ECA to CCA, and ICA to ECA, the ratio of the carotid bulb to the CCA,
and the ratio of the outflow to inflow area, calculated as
(ICA2+ECA2)/CCA2.
We compared the means of all vessel diameter and area ratios between
men and women. In addition, we determined the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th,
and 90th percentiles of the total population distribution for each
vessel diameter and area ratio. Using these values as cutoff points, we
formed the following categories for each vessel diameter and area
ratio: <10th percentile, 10th to 24th percentile, 25th to 49th
percentile, 50th to 74th percentile, 75th to 89th percentile, and
90th percentile. We calculated the odds of men being in a particular
category compared with women. To assess the consistency of
the results independently of the severity of
atheromatous disease, the analysis was also
performed on angiograms with no disease.
The following baseline clinical characteristics were collected in the ECST: age, smoking, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, hemoglobin, hematocrit, urea, blood glucose, antihypertensive therapy, cardiac failure, presentation with lacunar versus nonlacunar symptoms, history of angina, history of myocardial infarction, history of peripheral vascular disease, and occurrence of transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, retinal artery occlusion, or minor or major stroke before randomization. To determine a possible association with bifurcation anatomy, we related each variable to the vessel ratios. When a statistically significant relationship (corrected for multiple comparisons) was discovered, we performed multiple regression analysis to further evaluate the association. Some patients had bilateral stenosis <50%, and both their bifurcations were included in the analysis. This would have resulted in double counting of their baseline characteristics. To avoid any potential bias, we therefore analyzed the baseline data both in relation to the patients and in relation to the bifurcations included in the study.
Assessment of the Distribution of
Atherosclerotic Plaque
To study the distribution of disease we included
angiograms of all 3007 symptomatic bifurcations in our
analysis. We measured the degree of stenosis and the
total length of the segment of vessel affected by plaque. The length of
the plaque was recorded as a ratio with the diameter of a
disease-free portion of the CCA. We determined the location of the
plaque as indicated by point of maximum stenosis. This was
classified as being located in the CCA, the bulb of the ICA, or distal
to the bulb of the ICA. We also determined the prevalence and extent of
disease in the proximal ECA. The degree of stenosis of the ECA
was calculated in a manner similar to the ECST method of measurement of
ICA stenosis, ie, we used the estimated normal lumen diameter
at the point of maximum stenosis as the denominator. We
compared each of these assessments between men and women.
Statistical analysis was done with SPSS for Windows version 9.0.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Of the 5395 angiograms, 2930 had carotid stenosis of <50%. We found that 1420 patients had unilateral ICA or CCA stenosis of <50%, and 755 patients had ICA stenosis of <50% bilaterally. Therefore, we had 2930 bifurcations (2105 male, 825 female) in 2175 patients (1559 male [mean age, 62.1 years; SD 8.2], 616 female [mean age, 62.3 years; SD 8.6]) available for study. The results below are based on 2930 carotid bifurcations. All analyses were also performed in relation to patients and produced virtually identical results (data available from authors). There were no sex differences in the angiographic view, the number of views available, the method of image acquisition, the angiographic technique, or the image quality. Measurements of the ICA/CCA ratio showed good intraobserver reliability. There was no difference, and therefore no bias, between the mean values of the first and second readings, and the measurements were highly correlated (r=0.85; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90; P<0.001). Interobserver agreement on the 976 independently assessed angiograms was also good. There was no significant difference between the population mean ICA/CCA ratios obtained by the 2 observers, and the measurements were highly correlated (r=0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.84; P<0.001).
Arterial Lumen Diameter and Area
Ratios
The
Table shows the vessel ratios that we determined. The
overall mean ICA/CCA ratio was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.64). It was
significantly (P<0.0001)
higher in women (0.67; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.68) than in men (0.62; 95%
CI, 0.61 to 0.63). This difference was also present when the
analysis was confined to bifurcations with no disease.
Figure 2A shows that low ICA/CCA ratios were more
frequent in men and higher ICA/CCA ratios more frequent in women. We
did not find a significant difference between men and women in the
bulb/CCA ratio
(Figure 2B) or in the ECA/CCA ratio
(Figure 2C). However, high ICA/ECA ratios were more common in
women than in men
(Figure 2D), and consequently the mean ICA/ECA ratio was
significantly (P<0.0001)
higher in women (1.19; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.22) than in men (1.10; 95%
CI, 1.09 to 1.11).
Figure 3 shows that low outflow to inflow area ratios
were more common in men than in women. The mean ratios were 0.71 (95%
CI, 0.70 to 0.72) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.79), respectively. As
cutoff points for the categories shown in
Figures 2 and 3, we used the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th
percentiles of the population distribution for each vessel diameter and
area ratio. However, because of digit preference, some values occurred
more than once. Therefore, the number of bifurcations in each category
did not always correspond exactly with the percentiles. The figures
show that for the vessel ratios in which significant sex differences
were present, these were most marked at the edges of the
distributions. The odds of having an ICA/CCA ratio <10th percentile
were 3.9 times (95% CI, 2.4 to 6.5) greater in men than in women,
whereas the odds of having an ICA/CCA ratio 90th percentile were 0.5
(95% CI, 0.4 to 0.6) when we compared men with women. However, men and
women were equally likely to have an ICA/CCA ratio in the middle of the
distribution. Differences were also marked for the ICA/ECA ratio: the
odds of having an ICA/ECA ratio <10th percentile were more than twice
as high in men than in women (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to
2.8), whereas the odds of having an ICA/ECA ratio 90th percentile
were less than half as high in men than in women (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3
to 0.6). Again, men and women were equally likely to have an ICA/ECA
ratio between the 25th and 75th percentiles. These results lead to a
female and male pattern in carotid bifurcation anatomy:
relative to the ECA and the CCA, the ICA tends to be larger in women
than in men, and women also tend to have larger outflow to inflow area
ratios.
Figure 4 shows angiographic examples of these
patterns.
|
|
|
|
The vessel diameter ratios were normally distributed. In a previous study we had therefore defined the lower limit of normal of the ICA/CCA ratio as a ratio 2 SDs below the overall mean value (ie, below the 2.5th percentile).22 The lower limit was 0.42. However, given the systematic difference between men and women, we reevaluated this. Since the mean ICA/CCA ratio (SD) was 0.62 (0.11) in men and 0.67 (0.11) in women, we obtained lower limits of normal of 0.40 and 0.45, respectively.
We related the vessel diameter ratios to the baseline clinical data collected in the ECST. The majority of baseline characteristics were unrelated to bifurcation anatomy. Some variables (smoking, history of peripheral vascular disease, presentation with ocular ischemia) were associated with small differences in the vessel ratios. However, these were all much smaller than the sex effect. The sex differences were independent of all other baseline characteristics in multiple regression analyses.
Distribution of Atherosclerotic Plaque
In the whole trial population, the mean
stenosis was 51% (SD 22.5). This did not differ significantly
between men and women (P=0.27).
However, men were more likely than women to have the point of maximum
stenosis distal to the bulb of the ICA (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.33
to 4.01; P=0.001). There were
no sex differences in the length of the stenosis expressed as a
ratio with the diameter of a disease-free portion of the CCA: the mean
value was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.90 to 2.05) for women and 1.96 (95% CI,
1.91 to 2.00) for men. Atherosclerotic disease in the ECA was more
prevalent in women. Women were more likely than men to have plaque in
the ECA (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.85;
P<0.0001) and were more likely
to have stenosis 50% (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.57;
P<0.0001).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Our findings show that sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy are not limited to the absolute size of vessels. In addition, relative to the ECA and to the CCA, the ICA is larger in women than in men, and in relation to the inflow area, women have larger outflow areas than men (Figure 4
). These differences in bifurcation anatomy
were independent of other baseline characteristics. We also found sex
differences in the distribution of carotid bifurcation plaque. Men were
more likely to have the point of maximum stenosis distal to the
bulb of the ICA, whereas women were more prone to develop disease of
the ECA.
Potential Shortcomings of the Study
Although we consider our findings to be valid, our
study has some potential shortcomings. First, observations on normal
anatomy should ideally be made on community-based cohorts. Our
study was based on a clinical trial population with carotid territory
ischemic events. However, the data available in the ECST would
have been impossible to obtain in a community-based study because the
invasive nature and risks of angiography prohibit its use in healthy
subjects. Angiography is a well-established, high-quality method of
vascular imaging, and the ECST afforded an opportunity to study carotid
anatomy angiographically in a large number of patients. The
only previous angiographic study that examined the relative sizes of
the carotid bifurcation vessels was too small to show the extent of sex
differences in bifurcation anatomy with sufficient statistical
power.16 Second, a study on
bifurcation anatomy should ideally only include bifurcations
with no atheromatous disease, since carotid
stenosis can lead to secondary changes in vessel
anatomy.19 20 21 22
However, by excluding angiograms with 50% stenosis, we
minimized such secondary effects. Moreover, our analysis of
disease-free, contralateral bifurcations produced very similar results
(Table).
Third, angiograms were obtained from many different centers.
Consequently, projection angles, magnification factors, type of
angiography, and image quality were not standardized. All these were
potential confounding factors in the comparison of vessel dimensions.
However, we did not find any differences in type of angiography, method
of image acquisition, film quality, number of views obtained, or other
potential angiographic confounders between men and women. Fourth,
angiography depicts the vessel lumen rather than the vessel wall. It is
therefore possible to miss early atherosclerotic changes, in particular
in the carotid bulb, a predilection site for atheroma. This
could lead to an underestimation of the true disease-free vessel
diameter. However, since overall there were no sex differences in the
extent of atheromatous disease in our population, it is
unlikely that underestimating the presence of very mild
atheroma would have resulted in bias, and it should
therefore not have an impact on our findings. Fifth, vessel diameters
depend on blood pressure and the force of cardiac contraction. The
diameters of the branches of the carotid bifurcation vary, on average,
by 4% to 6% between systole and
diastole.25
However, since we obtained all measurements of a bifurcation from a
single film, all the vessels were at the same point of the cardiac
cycle. Furthermore, we calculated the vessel diameter ratios, and these
do not change significantly with the cardiac
cycle.25 26
Finally, our study population consisted of older individuals with
symptomatic cerebrovascular disease. The anatomy of
the carotid bifurcation changes with age independently of any effect of
atherosclerosis,15
and it is possible that some of the anatomic differences we have shown
are acquired rather than congenital. Our findings should therefore also
be confirmed in younger disease-free populations.
Sex Differences in Bifurcation
Anatomy
Our results demonstrate that, when one compares the ICA
with the ECA, on average, women tend to have relatively larger ICAs and
smaller ECAs than men. This could reflect the fact that women have less
skull and facial tissues than men and therefore divert proportionately
less blood here and proportionately more to the brain. Sex differences
in carotid anatomy could explain the increased occurrence of
asymptomatic carotid bruits in women compared with men.
Ford et al27 showed that
women with an asymptomatic carotid bruit are up to 5.7
times less likely than men with bruits to have a stenosis of
the ICA. These non–disease-related bruits were not related to
differences in hematocrit, occurrence of cardiac murmurs, or
constitutionally smaller arteries. No explanation for the origin of the
bruits was offered by the authors. Our findings raise the possibility
that they may be due to anatomic differences. The relatively smaller
ECA in women could result in differences in blood flow patterns at the
bifurcation and the generation of bruits.
Our findings show that there were small but highly
significant differences in some of the mean vessel diameter and area
ratios between men and women. In addition, the differences in the
number of men and women at the edges of the distribution were large.
For example, the odds of having an ICA/CCA ratio <10th percentile were
3.9 times higher in men than in women, and the odds of having an
ICA/CCA ratio 90th percentile were twice as high in women than in
men. Sex differences were therefore particularly marked at the edges of
the distribution, ie, among individuals with small ICA/CCA ratios there
was a large excess of men, and among individuals with high ICA/CCA
ratios there was a large excess of women. Since our defined cutoff
points were the 10th and 90th percentiles, this still included
approximately 20% of the trial population, and when the results are
extrapolated to the general population, they apply to a large number of
individuals.
Localization of Disease
Previous studies have suggested that plaque formation
may partly be determined by bifurcation
anatomy.4 5 9
In flow models, Karino and
Goldsmith28 29
pointed out the importance of the diameter ratios at bifurcations and
also the presence of sudden vessel expansions, such as the carotid bulb
in the formation of flow disturbances, which could then have an
impact on plaque formation.
Womersley6 and Gosling et
al7 suggested that the area
ratio of an arterial bifurcation, calculated as the sum of
the cross-sectional areas of the branch vessels divided by the
cross-sectional area of the parent vessel, is of particular importance
in the development of plaque. A proportion of a pulse wave arriving at
a bifurcation is reflected, setting up a standing wave of pressure
proximal to the point of reflection. The higher the degree of
reflection, the more hemodynamic stress will develop
locally, and more flow energy will be lost. An increase in local
pressure can lead to endothelial damage and favor
plaque development. Gosling et
al7 calculated that the
optimal area ratio of an arterial bifurcation, causing the
least reflection of pressure and least loss of flow energy, is
1.15.7 Any deviation from
this ratio in either direction leads to increasing reflection of
incoming pulse waves and potentially favors plaque development in the
long term. Gosling et al stated that the area ratio of the aortic
bifurcation is close to the ideal value in human infants but decreases
with age, reaching a value of 0.75 by age 45 years, and thus possibly
contributing to atherogenesis in the elderly. On the basis of these
considerations, Spelde et al9
studied the area ratios of 60 normal and 40 diseased carotid
bifurcations at postmortem and found that the area ratio was lower in
the diseased bifurcations. However, they did not quantify the extent of
disease, and some of the anatomic changes could have been secondary to
atheroma.
These studies suggest that differences in bifurcation anatomy might partly account for differences in plaque formation. Population studies show that men have a higher prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis than women, especially before the age of 50 years.10 11 12 This is thought to be partly due to differences in sex hormone levels13 and differences between men and women in the prevalence of other vascular risk factors.14 However, sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy could also be partly responsible for differences in plaque formation. In our study we not only found differences in bifurcation anatomy between men and women, but we also found differences in the distribution of plaque. Women were more likely than men to have plaque in the ECA, whereas the point of maximum stenosis was located distal to the bulb of the ICA more frequently in men. These differences may have been a consequence of the differences in bifurcation anatomy. However, it is not possible to analyze the effects of bifurcation anatomy on plaque formation in a cross-sectional study.
Implications for Measurement of Carotid
Stenosis
Sex differences in the relative sizes of the vessels
also have implications for the measurement of stenosis. Several
methods for measuring carotid stenosis have been
described.23 24
They all measure the lumen diameter at the point of maximum
stenosis but use different denominators to calculate the
percentage of stenosis: the North American
Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy
Trial (NASCET) method uses a disease-free portion of the ICA distal to
the stenosis; the ECST method uses the estimated normal
diameter at the site of the lesion; and the common carotid method uses
a disease-free portion of the CCA. Sex differences in relative vessel
sizes result in 2 problems. First, since the ICA/CCA ratio is, on
average, larger in women than in men, the NASCET method will tend to
give a higher degree of stenosis in women than in men for a
given degree of stenosis by the common carotid method or the
ECST method. Although it is possible to convert measurements made by
one method to those of
another,23 different
conversion formulas should ideally be used for men and women. Second,
some patients develop abnormal poststenotic narrowing of the
ICA once the degree of stenosis is
>70%.22 In this situation,
the stenosis can no longer be measured reliably by the NASCET
method.30 We previously
reported the lower limit of the normal ICA/CCA ratio as
0.42.22 However, our
present analysis shows that the ICA/CCA ratio is greater in
women. This could lead to poststenotic narrowing being missed
in women or overestimated in men if the previous lower limit of normal
is applied. It is important to identify patients with
poststenotic narrowing because they have a low risk of stroke
on medical treatment and do not therefore benefit from carotid
endarterectomy.22 31
According to the present study, a lower limit of 0.40 should be
applied for men and a lower limit of 0.45 should be applied for women
to define the presence of abnormal poststenotic
narrowing.
Conclusions
Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy
are not limited to the absolute size of vessels. In addition, relative
to the ECA and to the CCA, the ICA is larger in women than in men, and
in relation to the inflow area, women have a larger outflow area.
Bifurcation anatomy has been implicated in the development of
plaque, and sex differences in bifurcation anatomy could partly
account for the sex differences in the prevalence and distribution of
carotid
atheroma.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The ECST was funded by the UK Medical Research Council. Dr Rothwell was supported by a Senior Clinical Fellowship from the UK Medical Research Council. We would like to thank Professor C.P. Warlow and the European Carotid Surgery Trialists for providing access to the ECST angiograms. Details of the collaborators have been reported previously.17
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Reprints requests to Dr Peter Rothwell, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6HE, England.
Received October 30, 2000; revision received January 24, 2001; accepted March 7, 2001.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Pujia A, Rubba P, Spencer MP. Prevalence of extracranial carotid disease detectable by echo-Doppler in an elderly population. Stroke. 1992;23:818–822.
2. Fabris F, Zanocchi M, Bo M, Fonte G, Poli L, Bergoglio I, Ferrario E, Pernigotti L. Carotid plaque, ageing, and risk factors: a study of 457 subjects. Stroke. 1994;25:1133–1140.[Abstract]
3.
Frangos SG, Gahtan
V, Sumpio B. Localization of atherosclerosis: role of
hemodynamics. Arch
Surg. 1999;134:1142–1149.
4.
Fisher M, Fieman S.
Geometric factors of the bifurcation in carotid atherogenesis.
Stroke. 1990;21:267–271.
5.
Zarins CK, Giddens
DP, Bharadvaj BK, Sottiurai VS, Mabon RF, Glagov S. Carotid bifurcation
atherosclerosis: quantitative correlation of plaque
localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress.
Circ Res. 1983;53:502–514.
6. Womersley JR. Oscillatory flow in arteries: the reflection of the pulse wave at junctions and rigid inserts in the arterial system. Phys Med Biol. 1958;2:313–323.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Gosling RG, Newman
DS, Bowden NLR, Twinn KW. The area ratio of normal aortic junctions.
Br J Radiol. 1971;44:850–853.
8. Lallemand RC, Brown KGE, Boulter PS. Vessel dimensions in premature atheromatous disease of aortic bifurcation. BMJ. 1972;2:255–257.
9. Spelde AGA, de Vos RAI, Hoogendam IJ, Heethar RM. Pathological-anatomical study concerning the geometry and atherosclerosis of the carotid bifurcation. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4:345–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Joakimsen O,
Bonaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E, Jacobsen BK. Age and sex differences in
the distribution and ultrasound morphology of carotid
atherosclerosis: the Tromso Study.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:3007–3013.
11.
Kroger K, Suckel
A, Hirche H, Rudofsky G. Different prevalence of
asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in males and females.
Vasc Med. 1999;4:61–65.
12.
Prati P, Vanuzzo
D, Casaroli M, di Chiara A, de Biasi F, Feruglio AF, Touboul P.
Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis
in a general population.
Stroke. 1992;23:1705–1711.
13. Manson JE. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and atherosclerotic disease. Am Heart J. 1994;128(pt 2):1337–1343.
14. Weidner G. Why do men get more heart disease than women? An international perspective. J Am Coll Health. 2000;48:291–294.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Crouse JR, Goldbourt U, Evans G, Pinsky J, Sharrett AR, Sorlie P, Riley W, Heiss G, for the ARIC Investigators. Arterial enlargement in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort: in vivo quantification of carotid arterial enlargement. Stroke. 1994;25:1354–1359.[Abstract]
16. Williams MA, Nicolaides AN. Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1987;1:91–96.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379–1387.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Rothwell PM, Gibson JR, Villagra R, Sellar R, Warlow CP. The effect of angiographic technique and image quality on the reproducibility of measurement of carotid stenosis and assessment of plaque surface morphology. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:439–443.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Deweese JA, May
AG, Lipchik EO, Rob CG. Anatomic and hemodynamic
correlations in carotid artery stenosis.
Stroke. 1970;1:149–157.
20. May AG, Deweese JA, Rob CG. Haemodynamic effects of arterial stenosis. Surgery. 1963;53:513–524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Kindt GW, Youmans JR. The effect of stricture length on critical arterial stenosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;128:729–734.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Rothwell PM,
Warlow CP. Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced
internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe
symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Stroke. 2000;31:622–630.
23. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. Stroke. 1994;25:2435–2439.[Abstract]
24. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. Stroke. 1994;25:2440–2445.[Abstract]
25.
Reneman RS,
Merode T van, Hick P, Hoeks APG. Flow velocity patterns in and
distensibility of the carotid artery bulb in subjects of various ages.
Circulation. 1985;71:500–509.
26. Van Merode T, Hick PJ, Hoeks AP, Smeets FA, Reneman RS. Differences in carotid wall properties between presumed-healthy men and women. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14:571–574.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Ford CS, Howard
VJ, Howard G, Frye JL, Toole JF, McKinney WM. The sex difference in
manifestations of carotid bifurcation disease.
Stroke. 1986;17:877–881.
28. Karino T, Goldsmith HL. Particle flow behavior in models of branching vessels, II: effects of branching angle and diameter ratio on flow patterns. Biorheology. 1985;22:87–104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Karino T, Goldsmith HL. Role of blood cell-wall interactions in thrombogenesis and atherogenesis: a microrheological study. Biorheology. 1984;21:587–601.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Fox AJ. How to
measure carotid stenosis.
Radiology. 1993;186:316–318.
31. Rothwell PM, Mayberg MR, Barnett HJM, Warlow CP. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic stenosis, II: overall results by degree of stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(suppl 2):107. Abstract.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. J. Gladstone, J. Oh, J. Fang, P. Lindsay, J. V. Tu, F. L. Silver, and M. K. Kapral Urgency of Carotid Endarterectomy for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Results From the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): 2776 - 2782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Klein, R. A. Hegele, D. G. Hackam, M. L. Koschinsky, M. W. Huff, and J. D. Spence Lipoprotein(a) Is Associated Differentially With Carotid Stenosis, Occlusion, and Total Plaque Area Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2008; 28(10): 1851 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Sander, C. Schulze Horn, C. Briesenick, and D. Sander High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is Independently Associated With Early Carotid Artery Progression in Women But Not in Men: The INVADE Study Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2881 - 2886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Krejza, M. Arkuszewski, S. E. Kasner, J. Weigele, A. Ustymowicz, R. W. Hurst, B. L. Cucchiara, and S. R. Messe Carotid Artery Diameter in Men and Women and the Relation to Body and Neck Size Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1103 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Kasner, M. I. Chimowitz, M. J. Lynn, H. Howlett-Smith, B. J. Stern, V. S. Hertzberg, M. R. Frankel, S. R. Levine, S. Chaturvedi, C. G. Benesch, et al. Predictors of Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of a Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 555 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Thomas, L. Antiga, S. L. Che, J. S. Milner, D. A. Hangan Steinman, J. D. Spence, B. K. Rutt, and D. A. Steinman Variation in the Carotid Bifurcation Geometry of Young Versus Older Adults: Implications for Geometric Risk of Atherosclerosis Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2450 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Dick, C. Sherif, S. Sabeti, J. Amighi, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger Gender Differences in Outcome of Conservatively Treated Patients With Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Stenosis Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1178 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. I. Levin The Puzzle of Aspirin and Sex N. Engl. J. Med., March 31, 2005; 352(13): 1366 - 1368. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Alamowitch, M. Eliasziw, H. J.M. Barnett, and for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarte The Risk and Benefit of Endarterectomy in Women With Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Disease Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 27 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S R Messe, S E Kasner, Z Mehta, C P Warlow, P M Rothwell, and for the European Carotid Surgery Trialists Effect of body size on operative risk of carotid endarterectomy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1759 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Iemolo, A. Martiniuk, D. A. Steinman, and J. D. Spence Sex Differences in Carotid Plaque and Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Rothwell For Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument Against Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1817 - 1819. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Rothwell, S. A. Gutnikov, and C. P. Warlow Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||