| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2001;32:1607.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology (D.W.J.D., E.J. van B., R.J.M., P.J.K.), University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (H.M.A. van G.), Eemland Ziekenhuis, Amersfoort, the Netherlands; and Department of Neurology (H.B. van der W., L.J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to D.W.J. Dippel, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail dippel{at}neuro.fgg.eur.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsSeventy-five patients with acute ischemic stroke confined to the anterior circulation were randomized to treatment with either 500 mg (low dose) or 1000 mg (high dose) acetaminophen or with placebo, administered as suppositories 6 times daily during 5 days. Body temperatures were measured with a rectal electronic thermometer at the start of treatment and after 24 hours and with an infrared tympanic thermometer at 2-hour intervals during the first 24 hours and at 6-hour intervals thereafter. The primary outcome measure was rectal temperature at 24 hours after the start of treatment.
ResultsTreatment with high-dose acetaminophen resulted in 0.4°C lower body temperatures than placebo treatment at 24 hours (95% CI 0.1°C to 0.7°C). The mean reduction from baseline temperature with high-dose acetaminophen was 0.3°C (95% CI 0°C to 0.6°C) higher than that in placebo-treated patients. Treatment with low-dose acetaminophen did not result in lower body temperatures. After 5 days of treatment, no differences in temperature were found between the placebo and the high- or low-dose acetaminophen groups.
ConclusionsTreatment with a daily dose of 6000 mg acetaminophen may result in a small, but potentially beneficial, decrease in body temperature shortly after ischemic stroke, even in normothermic and subfebrile patients. Further studies should determine whether this effect is reproducible and whether early reduction of body temperature leads to improved outcome.
Key Words: acetaminophen hypothermia randomized controlled trials stroke, acute stroke, ischemic
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The harmful effects of an early rise in body temperature have been attributed to increased cerebral metabolic demands,8 changes in the blood-brain barrier permeability, acidosis, and an increased release of excitatory amino acids.9 In animal models of temporary focal cerebral ischemia, mild intraischemic hyperthermia increased infarct volume,10 whereas mild hypothermia reduced infarct size.11
A pharmacological reduction of body temperature in patients with acute ischemic stroke may improve functional outcome. To date, however, there are no controlled studies of the effects of antipyretic agents on temperature in these patients or of the effect of temperature reduction on outcome. Moreover, the effect of antipyretic agents on body core temperature in stroke patients with a normal temperature at the onset has not been investigated.
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) has a weak inhibitory effect on peripheral prostaglandin biosynthesis (which accounts for its weak anti-inflammatory activity), but it is a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin production within the central nervous system. This presumably accounts for its analgesic and antipyretic properties.12 Acetaminophen is usually well tolerated, has almost no side effects or drug interactions at therapeutic doses, and has no effect on cardiovascular and respiratory systems.12 Its use in stroke patients to treat and prevent fever has been advocated, but the effectiveness of such a treatment has never been studied.13 14
There are several arguments against routinely prescribing acetaminophen for patients with stroke. First, there is a safety concern, because treatment with acetaminophen may mask fever, which may lead to later detection of pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and sepsis. Moreover, large doses of acetaminophen may lead to acute liver failure, especially in patients with chronic liver disease. Second, it has not been established whether active reduction of body temperature in patients with acute stroke will lead to an improved clinical outcome.15 Third, it is equally unknown whether treatment with acetaminophen leads to early and clinically worthwhile reduction of body temperature in stroke patients, especially when they have no initial fever or subfebrile temperature. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to determine whether early treatment in the acute stage leads to a lower body temperature than when there is no treatment.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
Patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute
ischemic anterior circulation stroke were included in the
study. A cranial CT scan was obligatory before randomization and had to
be compatible with acute ischemic stroke. All patients were
required to have a stable focal deficit without rapid improvement and
the possibility of starting treatment within 24 hours to be included in
the study.
Patients were excluded if their body temperature at admission was <36.0°C or >39.0°C or if they had already been treated with steroids or nonsteroidal ant-inflammatory drugs within 3 days before the stroke, because this could confound a possible treatment effect. We also excluded patients with a severe illness of a different nature, which could affect the assessment of the effect of the study medication on temperature, and patients with residual neurological impairment resulting from a previous stroke, which could influence the assessment of functional outcome.
Because of safety considerations, we excluded patients with chronic liver failure or cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, or a history of alcohol abuse and those who were allergic to acetaminophen or aspirin. Furthermore, patients who were moribund and those for whom no informed consent was given were not included in the study.
Ethical Aspects
All patients were given verbal and written
information about the potential risks and benefits of participation in
the study. Written consent was required before randomization. The
medical ethics committee of each participating center approved the
study protocol.
Treatment Allocation and Blinding
Treatment consisted of suppositories containing 500
mg (low dose) acetaminophen, 1000 mg (high dose)
acetaminophen, or placebo, given 6 times daily for 5 days.
We used suppositories because we anticipated a high incidence of
swallowing difficulties early after stroke. The study medication was
provided in white paper boxes, numbered consecutively with a medication
number. The treatment allocation schedule was based on
computer-generated random numbers. The treatment codes resided with the
hospital pharmacist in each center. One copy of the treatment codes was
kept by the secretary (A.K.) of the Safety Monitoring Committee, whose
members were not involved in execution of the study. The Executive
Committee and the local investigators were not aware of treatment
assignments. No treatment code was broken before the last follow-up
visit was completed. The treatment allocation was stratified for early
(within 12 hours) and late (12 to 24 hours) treatment, and the study
medication was blocked in lots of 6 (each by
center).
Study Activities
All patients were admitted to an acute stroke care
unit. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used
to assess the severity of the
stroke.16 After 1 month,
stroke type was classified according to the TOAST
criteria.17 Body temperature
was measured by means of a standard rectal electronic thermometer at
the start of treatment and 24 hours later. Tympanic temperatures were
taken at 2-hour intervals during the first day and at 6-hour intervals
during the next 6 days. Because the acetaminophen dose in
the high-dose group exceeded the usually recommended maximal dosage of
4 g/d, we assessed potential effects on liver enzymes at baseline and
after 5 days.
Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measure in this study was
body temperature at 24 hours from the start of treatment, measured with
a rectal thermometer. Secondary outcome measures were reduction in body
temperature after 1 and 5 days from the start of treatment and the area
under the 1- and 5-day temperature curves. As a tertiary outcome
measure, we determined stroke severity at 1 month, as defined by the
score on the modified Rankin
scale,18 although this study
was not designed to detect a significant effect on clinical
outcome.
Safety
Serious adverse events were defined as any
potentially life-threatening deterioration in health status within the
study monitoring period (day 0 to day 7). Adverse events included any
infection, such as pneumonia, sepsis, or urinary tract infection that
requires antibiotic treatment according to the judgment of the treating
physician; any liver function disturbance (ASAT, ALAT, AF, or
total bilirubin levels that exceed twice the local upper limit of
normal); and any neurological deterioration (ie, decrease in level of
consciousness of >1 point on the Glasgow Coma Scale or an increase of
2 points on the NIHSS). Then independent, unblinded Safety and Data
Monitoring Committee reviewed all serious adverse events on a weekly
basis.
Statistical Analysis
The study results were analyzed on an
intention-to-treat basis. No interim analysis was carried out.
The main results of the study are presented as the mean
absolute difference in temperature between the 2 treatment groups and
the control group, with 95% CIs. Multiple linear regression was
performed to study a possible dose-effect relationship between
treatment and body temperature and to adjust for possible confounding
factors, such as age, ischemic stroke subtype, stroke severity,
and body temperature at admission and at the start of
treatment.
Sample Size
It was determined beforehand that a 0.5°C
difference in body temperature after 24 hours would be clinically
significant. Such a difference could be equivalent to a 5% to
10% absolute lower risk of poor outcome in patients with a moderately
severe stroke.6 To be able to
detect a difference in body temperature at 24 hours of 0.5°C, with a
significance level of 0.05 and power of 0.80, assuming an SD of
0.6°C, we would need
23 patients in each treatment group. This
number was rounded to 25. No formal statistical stopping rule was
used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One patient, who awoke with a right-sided hemiparesis
and aphasia, was diagnosed as having a low-grade glioma, 2 days after
inclusion in the study. This patient was excluded from the
analysis. Another patient, a 51-year-old man with a pure
sensory stroke, was lost to follow-up after having been discharged 6
days after the onset of symptoms
(Figure 1
). In this patient, the last observation of
functional outcome was carried forward. Both these patients were
receiving placebo. Nine patients discontinued the study medication
because they were discharged early after a speedy recovery; these
patients did complete the 1-month follow-up assessment. Six patients
died after the treatment was completed but before the scheduled 1-month
follow-up.
|
No crossovers occurred, and all patients were treated according to the allocated protocol at least during the first 24 hours, until the primary outcome assessment. For all patients in the study, the blinding was maintained, and no applications for unblinding were made by the local investigators. No safety concerns were raised by the Data Monitoring and Safety Committee.
The clinical characteristics of the study population
are summarized in
Table 1
. The treatment groups were balanced with
regard to potential determinants of body temperature, except for a
slight excess of patients with nonlacunar infarction and with aphasia
in the medium-dose group. The score on the NIHSS was on average 3.2
points higher in the medium-dose group than in the placebo group and
2.0 points higher in the high-dose group than in the placebo group,
suggesting more severe strokes in the patients receiving active
treatment.
|
Main Results
The mean body temperature at 24 hours after the
start of treatment was 0.4°C lower in the high-dose group than in the
placebo group (95% CI 0.1°C to 0.7°C)
(Figure 2
and
Table 2
). The mean reduction in body temperature
during the first 24 hours of treatment differed by 0.3°C between the
high-dose and placebo groups (95% CI 0°C to 0.6°C). The area under
the curve was significantly smaller in the high-dose group, at least
during the first 24 hours of treatment, which implies that the total
time with elevated temperature in that period decreased with the use of
acetaminophen. Adjustment for stroke severity (NIHSS at
baseline), stroke type (lacunar or nonlacunar), or start of treatment
(within 12 hours or between 12 to 24 hours) by multiple linear
regression did not change the effect estimate of 0.4°C in the
high-dose treatment group.
|
|
On day 5, no statistically significant difference in
body temperature was observed between the placebo and medium- or
high-dose group
(Table 2
).
In an "on-treatment" analysis, we excluded data from patients who did not actually take their study medication. This did not change the effect estimates; most likely because all patients completed the 24-hour treatment period and 67 (89%) completed the 5-day treatment period.
Functional outcome at 1 month did not differ significantly among the 3 treatment groups. Twelve patients in the placebo group (48%), 13 (52%) in the medium-dose group, and 17 (65%) in the high-dose group had a poor outcome (modified Rankin scale >2). The relative risk (OR) of poor outcome due to high-dose acetaminophen compared with placebo was 1.9 (95% CI 0.6 to 5.9), but after adjustment for baseline NIHSS in a multiple logistic regression model, this relative risk was reduced to 1.1 (95% CI 0.2 to 5.7). Thus, an apparent adverse effect of high-dose acetaminophen on functional outcome could be attributed to a slight imbalance in the distribution of stroke severity at baseline in this study.
Serious Adverse Events
Six patients died during the study: 1 from pneumonia
leading to sepsis, 2 from myocardial infarction, and 3 from progressive
stroke. The patient with pneumonia had been allocated to the placebo
group. Serious adverse events did not occur more often in the patients
on active treatment than in the patients receiving placebo
(Table 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The concern that treatment with an antipyretic drug may mask emerging infections, and thus lead to treatment delay, sepsis, and poor outcome, was not substantiated in this study.
We measured body temperature with a standard rectal thermometer. The relationship between body temperature (measured with a rectal thermometer) and brain temperature is controversial.19 The results of the Copenhagen Stroke Study, in which only rectal temperature was measured, should have made this discussion unnecessary.6 Moreover, in a study of moderate hypothermia in patients with traumatic brain injury, rectal temperatures remained very close to actual brain temperatures, as measured intracranially.20
We did not measure plasma concentrations of acetaminophen in this study. Such information would have been helpful in explaining the lack of effect in the medium-dose group, in further exploring a dose-response relationship, and in designing further pragmatic studies that make use of oral acetaminophen.
One may argue that increased body temperature does not accelerate the ischemic cascade but is merely an epiphenomenon. In the Copenhagen study, however, the relationship between body temperature and outcome remained statistically significant after adjustment for initial stroke severity.6 This makes it less likely that body temperature only reflects the amount of brain tissue damage. Early body temperature measurements (within the first 6 hours) seem to be more strongly related to outcome than later measurements. This suggests that the relationship with poor outcome is not confounded by the occurrence of secondary infections, such as pneumonia or urinary tract infection, because these usually appear later in the course of the disease. Moreover, animal studies of acute middle cerebral artery territory ischemia suggest a protective effect of early hypothermia and a detrimental effect of induced hyperthermia.10 In a recent study of 725 consecutive patients admitted within 6 hours from the onset of acute ischemic stroke, no relation was found between initial body temperature and outcome.18 The authors did use a rather insensitive method of statistical analysis (Spearman correlation and comparison of median modified Rankin scale scores with a nonparametric test). All patients with a body temperature of >37.0°C were treated with acetaminophen. Consequently, the results of this study should be interpreted with care.
To the best of our knowledge, no other randomized, controlled study of medical treatment that aimed at decreasing body or brain temperature in patients with ischemic stroke has been published. In a randomized clinical trial of moderate hypothermia (±33°C) in patients with severe head injury, a beneficial effect on speed of recovery and on the rate of good outcome was noted in the subgroup with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 5 to 7,20 although in a more recent and larger study, no effect of moderate hypothermia was found.21
The induction of moderate hypothermia was studied in a small study of patients with severe ischemic stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Temperatures of 34°C were reached, but a drawback of this approach was that patients had to be heavily sedated and artificially ventilated.22 Recently, Kammersgaard et al23 reported that hypothermic therapy with a forced air method for a period of 6 hours in unanesthetized stroke patients was sufficient to lower body temperature by 1.3°C on average. This procedure was well tolerated, but intravenous meperidine (pethidine) had to be used to control shivering. A similar approach with low-dose midazolam to control shivering resulting in a mean reduction of 1.25°C was used by our group.24 An important drawback of mechanical cooling is the need for some kind of analgesia and sedation, as well as the necessity of constant monitoring.
Conclusions
Treatment with high-dose acetaminophen
results in a small, but potentially worthwhile, decrease in body
temperature early in the acute phase of stroke, even in
normothermic patients. Further studies should determine
whether this effect of acetaminophen can be reproduced and
whether an early reduction in body temperature leads to improved
outcome.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 26, 2001; revision received March 26, 2001; accepted March 26, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Castillo J, Martinez F, Leira R, Prieto JM, Lema M, Noya M. Mortality and morbidity of acute cerebral infarction related to temperature and basal analytic parameters. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:6671.
3.
Azzimondi G,
Bassein L, Nonino F, Fiorani L, Vignatelli L, Re G, DAlessandro R.
Fever in acute stroke worsens prognosis: a prospective study.
Stroke. 1995;26:20402043.
4. Hindfelt B. The prognostic significance of subfebrility and fever in ischaemic cerebral infarction. Acta Neurol Scand. 1976;53:7279.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Castillo J,
Davalos A, Marrugat J, Noya M. Timing for fever-related brain damage in
acute ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 1998;29:24552460.
6. Reith J, Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Jeppesen LL, Olsen TS. Body temperature in acute stroke: relation to stroke severity, infarct size, mortality, and outcome. Lancet. 1996;347:422425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Jorgensen HS, Reith J, Pedersen PM, Nakayama H, Olsen TS. Body temperature and outcome in stroke patients. Lancet. 1996;348:193.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Nemoto EM,
Frankel HM. Cerebral oxygenation and
metabolism during progressive hyperthermia.
Am J Physiol. 1970;219:17841788.
9.
Busto R,
Globus MY, Dietrich WD, Martinez E, Valdes I, Ginsberg MD. Effect of
mild hypothermia on ischemia-induced release of
neurotransmitters and free fatty acids in rat brain.
Stroke. 1989;20:904910.
10. Meden P, Overgaard K, Pedersen H, Boysen G. The influence of body temperature on infarct volume and thrombolytic therapy in a rat embolic stroke model. Brain Res. 1994;647:131138.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Karibe H, Chen SF, Zarow GJ, Gafni J, Graham SH, Chan PH, Weinstein PR. Mild intraischemic hypothermia suppresses consumption of endogenous antioxidants after temporary focal ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 1994;649:1218.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Clissold SP. Paracetamol and phenacetin. Drugs. 1986;32(suppl 4):4659.
13. De Keyser J. Antipyretics in acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1998;352:67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Fukuda H, Kitani M, Takahashi K. Body temperature correlates with functional outcome and the lesion size of cerebral infarction. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100:385390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Correia M, Silva M, Veloso M. Cooling therapy for acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD001247.
16.
Brott T,
Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J,
Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V. Measurements of acute cerebral
infarction: a clinical examination scale.
Stroke. 1989;20:864870.
17.
Adams HPJ,
Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE.
Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions
for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in
Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:3541.
18.
Boysen G, Christensen H. Smoke severity determines body temperature in acute stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:413417.
19.
Schwab S,
Spranger M, Aschoff A, Steiner T, Hacke W. Brain temperature monitoring
and modulation in patients with severe MCA infarction.
Neurology. 1997;48:762767.
20.
Marion DW,
Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, Obrist WD, Kochanek PM, Palmer AM, Wisniewski SR,
DeKosky ST. Treatment of traumatic brain injury with moderate
hypothermia. N Engl J
Med. 1997;336:540546.
21.
Clifton GL,
Miller ER, Choi SC, Levin HS, McCauley S, Smith KR, Muizelaar JP,
Wagner FC, Marion DW, Luerssen TG, Chesnut RM, Schwartz M. Lack of
effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury.
N Engl J Med. 2001;344:556563.
22.
Schwab S,
Schwarz S, Spranger M, Keller E, Bertram M, Hacke W. Moderate
hypothermia in the treatment of patients with severe middle cerebral
artery infarction. Stroke. 1998;29:24612466.
23.
Kammersgaard
LP, Rasmussen BH, Jorgensen HS, Reith J, Weber U, Olsen TS. Feasibility
and safety of inducing modest hypothermia in awake patients with acute
stroke through surface cooling: a case-control study: the Copenhagen
Stroke Study. Stroke. 2000;31:22512256.
24. Miejer RJ, Visser H, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DWJ. Lowering body temperature in acute ischemic stroke without artificial ventilation and heavy sedation: a feasibility study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. In press.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Alberts, R. A. Felberg, L. R. Guterman, S. R. Levine, and for Writing Group 4 Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Stroke Intervention: State of the Art Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2845 - 2851. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. den Hertog, H. B. van der Worp, H. M. van Gemert, and D. W. Dippel Acetaminophen for Temperature Reduction in Acute Stroke: Potential but Unproven Benefits Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): e131 - e131. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): e478 - e534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1655 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W.J. Dippel, E. J. van Breda, H. B. van der Worp, H. M.A. van Gemert, L. J. Kappelle, A. Algra, and P. J. Koudstaal Timing of the effect of acetaminophen on body temperature in patients with acute ischemic stroke Neurology, September 9, 2003; 61(5): 677 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Commichau, N. Scarmeas, and S. A. Mayer Risk factors for fever in the neurologic intensive care unit Neurology, March 11, 2003; 60(5): 837 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Kasner, T. Wein, P. Piriyawat, C. E. Villar-Cordova, J. A. Chalela, D. W. Krieger, L. B. Morgenstern, S. E. Kimmel, J. C. Grotta, and H.-C. Koennecke Acetaminophen for Altering Body Temperature in Acute Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial * Editorial Comment: A Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 130 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |