(Stroke. 2001;32:2110.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine (S.K., K.H., H.K., Y.K., H.A.), and Hokkaido Neurosurgical Memorial Hospital (K.M.), Sapporo, Japan.
Correspondence to Satoshi Kuroda, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan. E-mail skuroda{at}med.hokudai.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Seventy-seven symptomatic patients were enrolled in this prospective, longitudinal cohort study. All patients met inclusion criteria of cerebral angiography, no or localized cerebral infarction on MRI or CT, and no or minimal neurological deficit. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and rCVR to acetazolamide were quantitatively determined by 133Xe SEPCT. All patients were categorized into 4 types on the basis of SPECT studies.
Results During an average follow-up period of 42.7 months, 16 total and 7 ipsilateral ischemic strokes occurred. The annual risks of total and ipsilateral stroke in patients with decreased rCBF and rCVR were 35.6% and 23.7%, respectively, risks that are higher than those in other types of patients. When strokes were categorized into patients with and without decreased rCBF and rCVR, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the risks of total and ipsilateral stroke in patients with decreased rCBF and rCVR were significantly higher than in those without (P<0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively, log-rank test). Relative risk conferred by decreased rCBF and rCVR was 8.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 34.4) for ipsilateral stroke and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.4 to 9.3) for total stroke.
Conclusions Decreased rCBF and rCVR to acetazolamide may identify a subgroup of patients who have a higher risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated medically.
Key Words: acetazolamide carotid arteries cerebral blood flow outcome reactivity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to vasodilators such as acetazolamide and CO2 is also used to evaluate cerebral perfusion reserve with SPECT, xenon CT, or transcranial Doppler sonography.414 Although CVR is supposed to be an alternative parameter for predicting long-term outcome, its validity is still controversial.5,6,10,1214 That is, 4 of 6 previous studies concluded that patients with impaired reactivity to acetazolamide or CO2 had high risk of subsequent ischemic stroke (see Table 3).5,6,12,13 In those studies, patients with impaired reactivity to acetazolamide or CO2 had an annual rate of between 11% and 18% of
|
See Editorial Comment, page 2115
ipsilateral stroke recurrence, although patients with preserved reactivity had an annual rate of between 0% and 2.2%. However, 2 other studies from the same group reached the opposite conclusion.10,14 Thus, they reported that no strokes were observed during a follow-up period of 1.5 years in 51 patients, 20 of whom had impaired reactivity to acetazolamide.10 Subsequently, Yokota et al14 from the same group also reported that there was no significant difference in cumulative recurrence-free survival rate between 55 patients with and 50 patients without impaired reactivity to acetazolamide, concluding that acetazolamide reactivity was not valuable for predicting patient prognosis.
Some reasons for the different conclusions from these 6 studies have been pointed out, including small sample size, short follow-up periods, withdrawal of a significant number of patients, and methodology of data analysis.5,6,10,1214 Most previous studies were retrospective. Another problem in discussing the usefulness of acetazolamide reactivity is the patient population studied. Of the 6 studies, 3 included patients with significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA).6,12,14 However, it is well known that stenotic lesion may cause ischemic stroke through either a hemodynamic or an embolic mechanism. It is not so easy to distinguish the underlying mechanism in patients with ICA or MCA stenosis, even if they have a critical reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).15 More important, as Yonas et al10,14 indicated, qualitative assessment of acetazolamide reactivity by [123I]IMP SPECT, used in 2 of the 6 studies, is known to have low sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients with a compromised reserve. According to their report, quantitative analysis revealed that 11 of 62 patients (18%) who were not considered to be compromised by qualitative criteria had a steal response to acetazolamide and that the positive predictive value of the qualitative method was 50%. Therefore, it is possible that patients were misclassified by qualitative analysis in regard to acetazolamide reactivity.16,17
Hence, in the present study, we aimed to determine whether CVR to acetazolamide could be a reliable predictor of subsequent ischemic stroke in medically treated patients with occlusive carotid diseases. From these observations, we decided to prospectively enroll only patients with occlusion of the ICA or MCA and to quantitatively measure blood flow and CVR to acetazolamide to avoid the above-mentioned problems. For this purpose, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was determined by the 133Xe inhalation method and SPECT, because the methodology is simple and easy to use to quantify blood flow.18
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SPECT Measurements
rCBF was measured
4 weeks after the last ischemic episode in all patients. Using the 133Xe inhalation method and SPECT (HEADTOME SET-031, Shimadzu Co), we quantitatively measured rCBF before and 15 minutes after injection of 10 mg/kg IV acetazolamide (acetazolamide test).7,8 rCBF was calculated by the sequential picture method described by Kanno and Lassen.18 To evaluate cerebral hemodynamics, 4-cm-diameter circular regions of interest were designated in the territory of the ipsilateral MCA. All regions of interest were placed in the regions in which no infarction was seen on CT and MRI. Regional CVR (rCVR) to acetazolamide was quantitatively calculated as follows: rCVR (%)=100x (rCBFACZ-rCBFrest)/rCBFrest, where rCBFrest and rCBFACZ represent rCBF before and after intravenous injection of acetazolamide, respectively.7,8 In this study, we injected a relatively low dose of acetazolamide (10 mg/kg) to assess rCVR because it is known that intravenous injection of 500 mg or 10 mg/kg acetazolamide is sufficient to increase rCBF.7,8,19
Normal control values of rCBF (43.1±3.0 mL · 100 g-1 · min-1, mean±SD) and rCVR (20.3±5.3%) were obtained from 8 volunteers free of cerebrovascular disease who were from 34 to 74 years of age (mean, 50.4 years).7,8 The values were rated as reduced when any was less than the mean minus 2 SD of the control values. As described elsewhere,7,8 all patients were divided into 4 types according to the SPECT findings in the ipsilateral MCA territory: type 1, normal rCBF and rCVR; type 2, normal rCBF and reduced rCVR; type 3, reduced rCBF and rCVR; and type 4, reduced rCBF and normal rCVR.
Follow-Up Study
All type 1, 2, and 4 patients were enrolled in the present study. However, a subgroup of type 3 patients who did not consent to surgery were enrolled because we recommended superficial temporal artery (STA)-MCA anastomosis when they were diagnosed as type 3.
All patients included in the present study were medically treated and were followed up in the outpatient clinic at Hokkaido University Hospital or its affiliate hospitals. Aspirin (81 mg/d) or ticlopidine (200 mg/d) was administered during the follow-up period, ranging from 2 to 118 months (mean, 42.7 months). The primary end point was stroke recurrence.
Statistical Analysis
The clinical background among the 4 groups was compared by use of
2 test or 1-factor ANOVA followed by Scheffés post hoc test as appropriate. Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional-hazards model tested the effect of multiple variables on the further stroke. Age, sex, clinical diagnosis, occluded artery, complications (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, and hypercholesterolemia), smoking, and SPECT results were considered covariates (Table 1). The cumulative recurrence free-survival rate was compared between groups with the Kaplan-Meier method and Mantel-Cox log-rank statistics.20 A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Characteristics of Patients
Risk factors such as age, sex, clinical diagnosis, occluded artery (ICA or MCA), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking were investigated (Table 1). There was no significant difference in these variables among the 4 groups.
Risk of Recurrent Stroke During Follow-Up
During the follow-up period, 16 total and 7 ipsilateral ischemic strokes occurred. There were no hemorrhages. The overall annual rate for total and ipsilateral stroke was 5.8% and 2.6%, respectively.
In 39 type 1 patients, 6 total strokes and 1 ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred 12 to 99 months after the initial ischemic attack. In 14 type 2 patients, 3 total strokes and 1 ipsilateral ischemic stroke occurred 2 to 93 months after initial ischemic attack. In 11 type 3 patients, there were 6 total and 4 ipsilateral ischemic strokes 5 to 31 months after onset. In 13 type 4 patients, there was 1 ipsilateral ischemic stroke 15 months after onset (Table 2). Thus, the annual risks of subsequent total stroke were 3.8%, 5.2%, 35.6%, and 2.4% per year in type 1, 2, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. The annual risks of subsequent ipsilateral stroke were 0.6%, 1.7%, 23.7%, and 2.4% per year in type 1, 2, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. Fourteen deaths occurred in total: 3 in type 1, 4 in type 2, 4 in type 3, and 3 in type 4.
|
Because the annual risks of ipsilateral and total ischemic stroke in type 3 patients were distinctly higher than in other types of patients, we divided the 77 patients into 2 categories: 11 patients with decreased rCBF and rCVR (type 3) and 66 patients without (types 1, 2, and 4). Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional-hazards model showed that having decreased rCBF and rCVR was a significant independent predictor of both ipsilateral and total stroke. No other risk factors were significant.
Kaplan-Meier analysis and Mantel-Cox log-rank statistics also showed that the risks of total and ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with decreased rCBF and rCVR were significantly higher than in those without (P<0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively; the Figure). Relative risk conferred by type 3 ischemia (decreased rCBF and rCVR) was 8.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 34.4) for ipsilateral ischemic stroke and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.4 to 9.3) for all ischemic stroke.
|
Characteristics of Recurrent Strokes
Characteristics of recurrent stroke are summarized in Table 2. In type 1 and 2 patients, most ischemic strokes (66.7%) developed in the contralateral ICA or vertebrobasilar territories. In particular, progression of occlusive lesion in the contralateral ICA was closely related to stroke recurrence. In type 3 patients, all 4 ipsilateral strokes were indicated to result from hemodynamic failure because cerebral infarctions were seen in the MCA territory widely or in the watershed zones (Table 2).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results mirror the conclusion in the review article by Klijn et al.21 They reviewed previous studies on the outcome of medically treated patients with and without compromised rCBF. According to their meta-analysis, annual risks of total and ipsilateral stroke were 12.5% and 9.5%, respectively, in patients with disturbed reactivity to acetazolamide. Furthermore, they were much higher, 41.4% and 31.0%, in patients with severely impaired hemodynamic measurements. The prognosis for these patients was definitely worse than for those patients without compromised rCBF.21 The present study revealed that the relative risk conferred by type 3 ischemia (decreased rCBF and rCVR) was 8.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 34.4) for ipsilateral stroke. This is very similar to previous results obtained from 2 PET studies. In those reports, the relative risk conferred by increased OEF was 6.4 (95%CI 1.6 to 26.1) or 7.3 (95%CI 1.6 to 33.4) for ipsilateral stroke.2,3
Acetazolamide has been widely used to assess cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with occlusive vascular disorder512,14 since Vorstrup et al4 reported its usefulness. Intravenous injection of acetazolamide is known to increase rCBF in a dose-dependent manner. Acetazolamide injection does not alter blood pressure and can estimate vasodilatory capacity, although CO2 inhalation may modify the result because of blood pressure augmentation.4,20 In previous studies,7,8 rCBF and rCVR were measured in 34 patients with ICA occlusion. All patients were classified into 4 types on the basis of 133Xe SPECT findings. In these preliminary studies, type 1 patients with normal rCBF and rCVR experienced no further stroke when treated medically for about 2 years. Cerebral angiography revealed well-developed collateral circulation through the anterior or posterior communicating artery in type 1 patients. Repeated SPECT studies also showed no significant changes in rCBF and rCVR during the follow-up periods. These results suggested that CPP is kept within a normal range in type 1 patients because of well-developed collateral circulation. In type 2 patients with normal rCBF and decreased rCVR, long-term normalization of rCVR was successfully obtained after STA-MCA anastomosis.79 Therefore, it is most likely that compensatory cerebral vasodilation occurs in response to a moderate reduction in CPP, decreasing rCVR, in type 2 patients. Such hemodynamic conditions may correspond to Powers stage I.22 Most type 3 patients with decreased rCBF and rCVR had contralateral ICA stenosis (gt;80%) or occlusion on cerebral angiography. A paradoxical rCBF decrease after acetazolamide injection is often observed in type 3 patients and is known as the steal phenomenon.4,7,8 Bypass surgery normalized rCVR in all patients. None suffered ischemic stroke during follow-up.7 These findings strongly indicated that autoregulatory vasodilation could no longer compensate for CPP reduction caused by inadequate collateral development, leading to a blood flow decline in type 3 patients. Therefore, type 3 ischemia may be a very similar condition to a state of misery perfusion or Powers stage II.11,22,23 No reports in the literature definitely document the pathophysiology of type 4 ischemia with decreased rCBF and normal rCVR. Bypass surgery could not improve blood flow, having no significant effects on cerebral hemodynamics. However, a recent study has indicated that selective neuronal injury resulting from long-lasting ischemia may be responsible for these results, although neither CT nor MRI could detect structural changes.24 It is most likely that metabolic demand is downregulated in response to a decreased blood flow in type 4 patients, although a precise PET study is necessary.
Recently, the prospective randomized clinical trial has been accepted as the highest level of evidence.25 In the present study, the included patients were graded on the basis of hemodynamic measurements when they were enrolled and were followed up monthly in an outpatient clinic. Therefore, this study is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study, although it lacks blinding during the follow-up period. The present study, however, also has some problems for evidence-based medicine. First, this study has bias in the patient selection. Although all patients diagnosed as types 1, 2, and 4 were included in this study, type 3 patients included in this study were not the whole population we experienced between 1990 and 1999 because the remainder of type 3 patients underwent STA-MCA anastomosis on the basis of our criteria (see above). As a result, the type 3 patients included in this study are a subgroup who did not consent to surgery, which might limit the ability to generalize from the conclusions. However, there was little investigator bias in deciding whether the patient should undergo surgery or not, and all type 3 patients included in this study were also followed up monthly. In addition, the overall annual rates of 5.8% and 2.6% for total and ipsilateral ischemic stroke in this study are comparable to those described previously. Thus, Klijn et al21 reported that the annual rates of total and ipsilateral stroke were 5.5% (95% CI, 5.0 to 6.0) and 2.1% (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.8), respectively, in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion. Therefore, we do not believe that the subjects in this study were eccentrically selected through some specific bias.
Second, the number of subjects (n=11) and outcome events (4 ipsilateral strokes) in type 3 was small. However, we do not believe that there are that many patients who are hemodynamically compromised because of occlusive carotid diseases. For example, Yamauchi et al3 recently reported that only 7 of 40 patients (17.5%) had increased OEF as a result of carotid occlusion, whereas another 33 patients (82.5%) had normal OEF. The follow-up period of type 3 subjects was also shorter than those of other patients because a significant number of type 3 subjects died of other diseases such as myocardial infarction. However, their number and follow-up period were sufficient for statistical analysis.
It should also be remembered that impaired vasodilatory capacity might improve during the follow-up period in a subgroup of patients.10,26 Widder et al26 reported that about half of the patients with ICA occlusion showed a spontaneous improvement of CO2 reactivity. Hasegawa et al10 reported improvement in acetazolamide reactivity in 3 of 20 patients. Spontaneous normalization of the ipsilateral-to-contralateral OEF ratio was also demonstrated in about half of the patients with ICA occlusion.27 These spontaneous improvements in vasodilatory capacity usually occur within a few months after onset. However, most of patients with bilateral ICA occlusion showed no significant change in vasodilatory capacity.26 The ipsilateral-to-contralateral OEF ratio remained high in 5 of 10 patients.27 Furthermore, Yamauchi et al28 recently reported that cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism may deteriorate during the follow-up period in patients with carotid occlusion. In addition, subsequent ipsilateral stroke is known to occur within a few months in hemodynamically compromised patients.1,2 These findings strongly suggest that hemodynamic parameters are still important factors for predicting outcome, although they may improve during follow-up in selected patients.
Previously, a large, international, randomized clinical trial on STA-MCA anastomosis conducted between 1977 and 1985 showed no beneficial effect in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion.29 However, as Grubb et al2 pointed out, the cerebral hemodynamic state of the enrolled patients was not previously measured. Nowadays, we can assess CPP reduction by determining OEF or rCVR to acetazolamide in patients with occlusive carotid diseases and should randomize a specific subgroup of patients with hemodynamic compromise in such clinical trials. In fact, although the annual rate for ipsilateral stroke exceeded 20% in type 3 patients when treated medically, it has been reported to be lower in similar patients after bypass surgery.79,30 Thus, Ishikawa et al30 reported that 4 of 28 patients experienced subsequent stroke during a mean follow-up of 48.9 months after STA-MCA anastomosis (annual rate, 3.5%). Now, an ongoing prospective randomized study in Japan, the Japanese EC/IC Bypass Study, is enrolling patients with reduced rCBF and rCVR to acetazolamide (type 3 according to our criteria) to clarify the beneficial effects of bypass surgery and is expected to provide more distinct answers on this subject.
In conclusion, the present results suggest that in this selected patient sample, reduced blood flow and reactivity to acetazolamide is predictive of subsequent ischemic stroke in patients with ICA or MCA occlusion. Quantitative measurements of blood flow and acetazolamide reactivity are very simple and useful for predicting patient outcome, although a prospective randomized trial is the next necessary step.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 30, 2001; revision received June 4, 2001; accepted June 25, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study by Kuroda et al provides one more contribution to a body of literature supporting the concept of a subgroup of patients who have a chronically compromised blood supply and significantly increased stroke risk.3,4 The importance of this article is that it is the first prospective study that confirms the value of a test of cerebral vascular reserve (CVR) as a predictor of the high stroke risk subgroup.
The authors report the incidence of stroke in 77 patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion after the quantitative assessment of CVR. They used quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements obtained with xenon 133 as the lipid-soluble tracer of CBF and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) for tomographic imaging. Studies were obtained immediately before and 20 minutes after an injection of acetazolamide, an agent known to increase CBF by inducing a local tissue acidosis. The "test-retest" format provided a means for isolating one variable, the ability of circulation to respond to a challenge that normally increases CBF by >30%. The assumption is that a lesser reactivity implies that the vascular bed is becoming increasingly vasodilated and thereby less able to vasodilate to the physiological challenge. A negative response ("steal phenomenon") has been associated with a dependence on ophthalmic and pial collaterals5 and implies a maximal vasodilatation.
Testing the validity of these assumptions, Kuroda et al reported that patients with a severely reduced CVR (mean of -5%) and a reduced baseline CBF had a significantly increased stroke risk (annual risk of 23.7%, with a relative risk of 8.0 for ipsilateral stroke). The authors suggest that the stroke incidence they observed, similar to that reported by Grubb et al3 (who used a measure of oxygen extraction fraction [OEF]), was due to their ability to distinguish the same subgroup of high-risk patients.
The suggestion that a study of CVR and a measure of oxygen extraction could identify a similar stroke subgroup is not surprising, based on examination of the underlying physiology presented in the seminal article by Powers et al.6 In that work, a series of stages of hemodynamic compromise were described. In stage 1, only blood volume is increased as perfusion pressure begins to fall and blood flow and oxygen availability remain uncompromised. Stage II is entered when a continuing drop of perfusion pressure occurs after a maximal vasodilation of precapillary vessels accompanied by a maximal blood volume. Within stage II, CBF falls from the norm of about 50 to near 20 mL/100 g per minute, without an apparent neurological deficit. Metabolism is maintained, despite the fall of CBF, by a rise of the OEF. A negative relationship between CVR by quantitative CBF and quantitative OEF has been reported.7,8 By combining a reduction of quantitative CBF with a severe compromise of CVR, especially the negative reactivity defined in the type 3 patients, the authors appear to have defined a group of patients that have a maximal CBV and a decrease of CBF who should have an elevated OEF.
Because OEF measurements are not only more costly but also less available, a CVR strategy for identifying patients at increased ischemic risk is desirable. If CVR proved to be as sensitive but less specific, it could function as a screening test before proceeding to a measure of OEF. If studies of CVR proved to be both sensitive and specific, they could be substituted for OEF. Other reasons to pursue a CVR strategy include the fact that OEF may be a less-reliable marker of ischemic risk after the subcortical white matter injuries that commonly accompany hemodynamic compromise. The currently proposed qualitative OEF measure also requires a "normal" hemisphere. It, therefore, cannot assess patients with bilateral disease, thus omitting the group at greatest ischemic risk with the most severe and prolonged hemodynamic disorder.9,10
An important challenge will be to better define the advantages and disadvantages of the many approaches currently available for the measurement of both OEF and CVR.
Department of Neurosurgery
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Nakamura, F. Okamoto, K. Nakanishi, R. Maruyama, A. Yamada, S. Ushikoshi, S. Terasaka, S. Kuroda, K. Sakai, and T. Higami Does Intensive Management of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Atheromatous Aorta Reduce Stroke After Coronary Artery Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 513 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Alexander, J. Moawad, and D. Super Outcome Analysis of Carotid Artery Occlusion Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2007; 41(5): 409 - 416. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuroda, N. Hashimoto, T. Yoshimoto, Y. Iwasaki, and for the Research Committee on Moyamoya Disease in Radiological Findings, Clinical Course, and Outcome in Asymptomatic Moyamoya Disease: Results of Multicenter Survey in Japan Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1430 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Uzunca, T. Asil, K. Balci, and U. Utku Evaluation of Vasomotor Reactivity by Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Patients With Acute Stroke Who Have Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Stenosis J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2007; 26(2): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chen, M.-H. Shyr, T.-Y. Chen, H.-Y. Lai, C.-C. Lin, and P.-S. Yen Dynamic CT Perfusion Imaging with Acetazolamide Challenge for Evaluation of Patients with Unilateral Cerebrovascular Steno-Occlusive Disease. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1876 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. van Raamt, A. P. A. Appelman, W. P. T. M. Mali, Y. van der Graaf, and For the SMART Study Group Arterial Blood Flow to the Brain in Patients with Vascular Disease: The SMART Study. Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 515 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Endo, T. Inoue, K. Ogasawara, T. Fukuda, Y. Kanbara, and A. Ogawa Quantitative Assessment of Cerebral Hemodynamics Using Perfusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Major Cerebral Artery Occlusive Disease: Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 388 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuroda, T. Shiga, K. Houkin, T. Ishikawa, C. Katoh, N. Tamaki, and Y. Iwasaki Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism and Neuronal Integrity in Patients With Impaired Vasoreactivity Attributable to Occlusive Carotid Artery Disease Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuroda, T. Ishikawa, K. Houkin, R. Nanba, M. Hokari, and Y. Iwasaki Incidence and Clinical Features of Disease Progression in Adult Moyamoya Disease Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2148 - 2153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Deguchi, M. Yamada, H. Kobata, and T. Kuroiwa Regional Cerebral Blood Flow After Acetazolamide Challenge in Patients with Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: Simple Way to Evaluate Intracranial Venous Hypertension AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1101 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Kirkpatrick and I Ng Cerebral revascularisation: where are we now? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2005; 76(4): 463 - 465. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Momjian-Mayor and J.-C. Baron The Pathophysiology of Watershed Infarction in Internal Carotid Artery Disease: Review of Cerebral Perfusion Studies Stroke, March 1, 2005; 36(3): 567 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J-C Baron Using PET to identify carotid occlusion patients at high risk of subsequent stroke: further insights J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1659 - 1660. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuroda, T. Shiga, T. Ishikawa, K. Houkin, T. Narita, C. Katoh, N. Tamaki, and Y. Iwasaki Reduced Blood Flow and Preserved Vasoreactivity Characterize Oxygen Hypometabolism Due to Incomplete Infarction in Occlusive Carotid Artery Diseases J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 943 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Lee, J. C. Paeng, D. S. Lee, J. S. Lee, C. W. Oh, M. J. Cho, J.-K. Chung, and M. C. Lee Efficacy Assessment of Cerebral Arterial Bypass Surgery Using Statistical Parametric Mapping and Probabilistic Brain Atlas on Basal/Acetazolamide Brain Perfusion SPECT J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 202 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamauchi, H. Okazawa, K. Sugimoto, Y. Kishibe, and M. Takahashi The Effect of Deafferentation on Cerebral Blood Flow Response to Acetazolamide AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 92 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Yamauchi, H Okazawa, Y Kishibe, K Sugimoto, and M Takahashi Oxygen extraction fraction and acetazolamide reactivity in symptomatic carotid artery disease J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okazawa, H. Yamauchi, K. Sugimoto, and M. Takahashi Differences in Vasodilatory Capacity and Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow Induced by Acetazolamide in Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1371 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||