(Stroke. 2002;33:21.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.E.V., A.H., M.M.B.B.) and Neurology (S.E.V., P.J.K.), Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, and Department of Radiology (M.O.), University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to M.M.B. Breteler, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail breteler{at}epib.fgg.eur.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods The Rotterdam Scan Study is a population-based cohort study among 1077 participants 60 to 90 years of age. Participants underwent cerebral MRI. We assessed cardiovascular risk factors by interview and physical examination. Associations between risk factors and presence of infarcts were analyzed by logistic regression and adjusted for age, sex, and relevant confounders.
Results For 259 participants (24%) 1 or more infarcts on MRI were seen; 217 persons had only silent and 42 had symptomatic infarcts. The prevalence odds ratio (OR) of both silent and symptomatic infarcts increased with age by 8% per year (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.10 and 1.04 to 1.13, respectively). Silent infarcts were more frequent in women (age-adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.8). Hypertension was associated with silent infarcts (age- and sex-adjusted OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.3), but diabetes mellitus and smoking were not.
Conclusions Silent brain infarcts are 5 times as prevalent as symptomatic brain infarcts in the general population. Their prevalence increases with age and seems higher in women. Hypertension is associated with silent infarcts, but other cardiovascular risk factors are not.
Key Words: cerebral infarction magnetic resonance imaging population prevalence risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Participants and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1995 to 1996, we randomly selected participants 60 to 90 years of age from both studies in strata of age (5 years) and sex. People with MRI contraindications were not eligible for our study and were excluded. A total of 1077 nondemented elderly individuals participated in our study (overall response 63%). The main reasons for not participating in the Rotterdam Scan Study were old age, too much trouble, not wanting to participate in brain research, and claustrophobia. The study design has been described in detail.6 Each participant gave informed consent. The medical ethics committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam approved the study.
Cerebral Infarcts
All participants underwent MRI of the brain. We made axial T1-, T2-, and proton-density-weighted scans on 1.5-T MRI scanners (MR Gyroscan, Philips, and MR VISION, Siemens). The slice thickness was 5 or 6 mm with an interslice gap of 20%. Laser hard copies were printed with a reduction factor of 2.7.
We defined infarcts as focal hyperintensities on T2-weighted images 3 mm in size or larger. Proton-density scans were used to distinguish infarcts from dilated perivascular spaces. Lesions in the white matter also had to have corresponding prominent hypointensities on T1-weighted images for us to distinguish them from cerebral white matter lesions. Lesions were defined as possible infarcts if this distinction between infarcts and white matter lesions could not be made. We did not consider possible infarcts as infarcts in our analyses; participants with only possible infarcts (n=73) were included in the reference group. A single trained physician who was blinded to history of stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) scored infarcts, including their localization and size. Intrarater study for detecting infarcts showed good agreement (
=0.80).
We obtained a history of stroke and TIA by self-report, and by checking medical records in all 1077 participants, independently on their MRI outcome. Stroke was defined as an episode of typical focal neurological deficits with acute onset and lasting for >24 hours. TIA was similarly defined, but with symptoms lasting <24 hours. An experienced neurologist with knowledge of the participants medical history subsequently reviewed the scans and categorized the infarcts on MRI as silent or symptomatic. We defined silent brain infarcts as evidence on MRI of 1 or more infarcts, without a history of a (corresponding) stroke or TIA. If prior stroke or TIA did correspond with a lesion, the latter was defined as a symptomatic infarct. Participants with both symptomatic and silent infarcts were included in the symptomatic infarct group. Intrarater reliability for the classification of infarcts as silent or symptomatic was excellent (
=1.0).
Cardiovascular Risk Factors
We obtained the cardiovascular risk factors by interview and physical examination in 1995 to 1996. Blood pressure was measured twice on the right arm with a random-zero sphygmomanometer. We used the average of these 2 measurements. We calculated pulse pressure by subtracting diastolic blood pressure from systolic blood pressure.7 Participants had hypertension if the systolic blood pressure was
160 mm Hg, if the diastolic blood pressure was
95 mm Hg, or if they reported the use of blood pressure-lowering medication. We considered diabetes mellitus to be present if a person was taking oral antidiabetics or insulin. A physician assessed participants smoking habits and alcohol intake using a structured questionnaire. The number of pack-years smoked was calculated for every participant (number of cigarettes per dayxyears of smoking/20). Smoking was then classified into the following categories: no smoking (0 pack-years), >0 and <20 pack-years, and
20 pack-years.
Data Analysis
The prevalence of silent and symptomatic infarcts on MRI was calculated in 5-year age strata. We analyzed the associations between potential risk factors and presence of infarcts by multiple logistic regression. These analyses were done separately for silent and symptomatic brain infarcts. No distinction was made between participants with 1 or more infarcts on their scan. Adjustments were made for age and sex, and additionally for other relevant confounders.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The prevalence of silent and symptomatic infarcts both increased significantly with age (Table 2). Only 8% in the youngest age category (60 to 64 years) had at least 1 silent brain infarct, whereas this proportion was 35% in the 85- to 90-year-old participants (Figure 2). Silent infarcts were more frequent in women than in men (Table 2). Ninety-one of 522 men (17%) had 1 or more silent infarcts on MRI compared with 126 of the 555 participating women (23%). This higher prevalence in women was constant over all age groups. No clear differences could be detected in the prevalence of symptomatic infarcts between men and women.
|
|
Hypertension was strongly associated with the presence of both silent and symptomatic infarcts (Table 2). The presence of diabetes mellitus and pack-years of smoking were associated with symptomatic, but not with silent, infarcts. Further adjustments for alcohol consumption did not alter this association with smoking.
The adjusted odds ratio of silent infarcts for the highest compared with the lowest category of systolic blood pressure, irrespective of blood pressure-lowering medication, was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.7; Figure 3). For diastolic blood pressure the odds even tripled (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.9). The presence of silent infarcts was also higher when we compared the highest with the lowest category of pulse pressure (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 8.9). Table 3 shows the relations between the blood pressure measures and brain infarcts when they were analyzed continuously. To allow comparison of the strength of the associations, they are all expressed as adjusted odds ratio per SD increase in blood pressure measure. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure were all associated with presence of silent brain infarcts. For symptomatic infarcts, no significant associations were found between systolic or diastolic blood pressure levels and presence of infarcts. Analysis in strata of antihypertensive treatment showed that in participants without treatment the proportion of participants with silent infarcts increased with increasing blood pressure (data not shown). The strength of the association of pulse pressure with symptomatic infarcts was very similar to that for silent infarcts, albeit not statistically significant. Pulse pressure was no longer related to silent brain infarcts after adjustment for systolic blood pressure level (odds ratio, 0.95 per SD increase; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.27). The strong colinearity between these blood pressure measures limits the interpretability of this finding. However, the effect of systolic blood pressure seems larger than that of pulse pressure (Table 3), which suggests that the latter may be mainly driven by the effect of systolic blood pressure.
|
|
All analyses were also performed with exclusion of participants with possible infarcts on MRI. This did not alter the strength of any of the associations described above.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some potential methodological limitations of our study need to be discussed first. The response rate in our study was high, but not 100%. Hence, there is a possibility of selection bias. The participating persons were significantly younger than nonresponders.6 Because we found the prevalence of silent brain infarcts to be higher with increasing age, the prevalence may be even higher in the highest age category. Nonparticipation because of cognitive or functional deficits may also have introduced bias, probably leading to an underestimation of the prevalence of brain infarctions. There was no difference in response rate between men and women. Therefore, it is unlikely that the difference in silent brain infarcts between sexes is due to selection bias.
Furthermore, we may have misclassified brain infarcts in 2 different ways. First, we might have incorrectly identified them on the MRI scan. Despite our good intrarater agreement, it is possible that we systematically over- or underrated infarcts. Second, we may have misclassified infarcts as being silent or symptomatic. We tried to minimize error by obtaining participants history of stroke and TIA not only by self-report, but also by checking medical records. Both the reader of the MRI scans and the experienced neurologist who classified the silent and symptomatic infarcts were blinded to all other data. Therefore, any misclassification will have resulted in an underestimation of the strength of the associations. The strengths of our study are the large number of participating elderly and its population-based design.
Two other population-based studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study, have found overall prevalences of silent brain infarcts of 11%3 and 28%,8 respectively. A Japanese community study, among participants who wished to receive health screening at their own expense, reported also a prevalence of 11%.9 However, in both the ARIC Study and the Japanese study the mean age of participants was much lower than in our study. The participants of the Cardiovascular Health Study had the same mean age, but had more women participating,10 compared with the Rotterdam Scan Study. Comparisons between all 4 studies are further hampered in that the MRI scanning protocol was not uniform; there were important differences in slice thickness, interslice gap, and type of scanner. Studies additionally differ in that none but ours verified the self-reported history of stroke and TIA by checking medical records. Besides, none of the other 3 studies checked whether prior strokelike symptoms corresponded to the infarcts, as we did. When we take the age and sex differences into account, the prevalences of silent infarcts in the 3 studies mentioned above accord, however, largely with ours. Our prevalence also fits with what a Japanese autopsy study found, although those authors report slightly lower age-specific prevalences, but that might be due to the thick slices they used.11
Consistent with the study of silent lacunar infarcts in the Cardiovascular Health Study,2 but not with those authors results regarding overall silent infarcts,8 we observed a 30% to 40% higher prevalence among women. This is in contrast to common observations regarding symptomatic stroke that is reportedly more frequent in men. Although the sex difference was no longer statistically significant when we adjusted for other risk factors, our data are compatible with a higher prevalence of silent infarcts in women than in men. Such a sex difference may be due to differences in reporting and interpreting symptoms of stroke or TIA by both patients and physicians, similar to what has been observed for acute myocardial infarction.12,13 Recent studies reported about this sex difference in the treatment of cerebrovascular disease.14,15 Furthermore, women of this age more often live without a partner. Especially for transient neurological symptoms, one may hypothesize that those women will not report their symptoms at all. This might explain why the reverse is seen for symptomatic stroke, namely a higher prevalence in men,16 although we could not duplicate this finding, which probably results from the small number of stroke survivors in our study. This higher prevalence of silent brain infarcts in women was not found in the younger cohorts of the Japanese study9 or in the ARIC Study.3
Hypertension was the only additional risk factor associated with silent brain infarcts in our study. The strong association with hypertension suggests that hypertensive small-vessel disease plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of silent brain infarcts. This finding accords with all other studies on silent and symptomatic infarcts. The absence of a significant association between symptomatic infarcts and systolic and diastolic blood pressure may result from the small numbers of participants with symptomatic infarcts or reflect that blood pressure often drops after a symptomatic infarct. Furthermore, the antihypertensive treatment in these participants with prior symptomatic stroke may also have contributed to the lack of association. Analysis in strata of antihypertensive treatment showed stronger associations between blood pressure level and presence of infarcts in persons without treatment, albeit probably because of small numbers, not significantly.
We could not find an association between any other cardiovascular risk factor and silent brain infarcts. Diabetes mellituswhich is known to exacerbate small-vessel disease next to hypertensionwas associated only with symptomatic infarcts in our study. We considered that we might have underestimated the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in our population, particularly in subjects without symptomatic infarcts. For persons with symptomatic infarcts, assessment of diabetic status may have been more correct, because these people are more likely to receive more medical attention. We did not have data on blood glucose level at time of the MRI examination. However, half of our cohort had been screened for diabetes mellitus just a few years before as part of the Rotterdam Study with an oral glucose load, and associations were similar in this part of the cohort. Although we cannot exclude that some differential misclassification may have occurred, we do not think that that can fully explain the discrepant findings for symptomatic and silent infarcts. The lack of association was consistent with the ARIC Study3 and the lacunar infarct study of the Cardiovascular Health Study,2 although not with the Japanese study.9 For smoking we likewise found a relation with symptomatic infarcts and not with silent infarcts. We think that a different distribution of infarct types may be the reason why. Smoking is known to enhance atherosclerosis leading to large-vessel disease, and we found a much larger proportion of cortical infarcts among the symptomatic infarcts. The majority of silent infarcts were lacunar, in which small-vessel disease is thought to play a more important role. The finding of Uehara et al17 that risk factors for silent infarcts in the white matter differed from those for basal ganglia infarcts also supports this. An association between smoking and silent infarcts was supported only by the ARIC Study.3 Unfortunately, the numbers in our study were too small to do risk factor analyses of the different subtypes of infarcts.
In conclusion, silent brain infarcts are common among the elderly. Silent brain infarcts are associated with hypertension, but not with other indicators of small- and large-vessel disease that are related to symptomatic infarcts. The prognosis of silent brain infarcts remains unclear. The study of Kobayashi et al9 showed that they increased risk of stroke onset 10-fold. However, as mentioned above, this study was not population-based. Prospective population studies will have to show the prognostic relevance of silent brain infarcts.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 30, 2001; revision received September 29, 2001; accepted October 1, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M van Oijen, E Y L Cheung, C E M Geluk, A Hofman, P J Koudstaal, M M B Breteler, and M P de Maat Haplotypes of the fibrinogen gene and cerebral small vessel disease: the Rotterdam scan study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 79(7): 799 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Prabhakaran, C. B. Wright, M. Yoshita, R. Delapaz, T. Brown, C. DeCarli, and R. L. Sacco Prevalence and determinants of subclinical brain infarction: The Northern Manhattan Study Neurology, February 5, 2008; 70(6): 425 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Reitz, M. J. Bos, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M.B. Breteler Prestroke Cognitive Performance, Incident Stroke, and Risk of Dementia: The Rotterdam Study Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ikram, M. W. Vernooij, A. Hofman, W. J. Niessen, A. van der Lugt, and M. M.B. Breteler Kidney Function Is Related to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 55 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. H Rosenberg Rethinking brain food Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1259 - 1260. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Vernooij, M. A. Ikram, H. L. Tanghe, A. J.P.E. Vincent, A. Hofman, G. P. Krestin, W. J. Niessen, M. M.B. Breteler, and A. van der Lugt Incidental Findings on Brain MRI in the General Population N. Engl. J. Med., November 1, 2007; 357(18): 1821 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, L. Ryden, E. Standl, M. Bartnik, G. V. d. Berghe, J. Betteridge, M.-J. de Boer, F. Cosentino, B. Jonsson, M. Laakso, et al. Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: full text: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2007; 9(suppl_C): C3 - C74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, L. Ryden, E. Standl, M. Bartnik, G. Van den Berghe, J. Betteridge, M.-J. de Boer, F. Cosentino, B. Jonsson, M. Laakso, et al. Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary: The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 88 - 136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R H Swartz and S E Black Anterior-medial thalamic lesions in dementia: frequent, and volume dependently associated with sudden cognitive decline J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 77(12): 1307 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ikram, M. Hollander, M. J. Bos, J. A. Kors, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, J.C.M. Witteman, and M. M.B. Breteler Unrecognized myocardial infarction and the risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology, November 14, 2006; 67(9): 1635 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. van Harten, F.-E. de Leeuw, H. C. Weinstein, P. Scheltens, and G. J. Biessels Brain Imaging in Patients With Diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care, November 1, 2006; 29(11): 2539 - 2548. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Howard, L. A. McClure, J. F. Meschia, L. Pulley, S. C. Orr, and G. H. Friday High Prevalence of Stroke Symptoms Among Persons Without a Diagnosis of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in a General Population: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study. Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2006; 166(18): 1952 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Elkins, W. T. Longstreth Jr, T. A. Manolio, A. B. Newman, R. A. Bhadelia, and S. C. Johnston Education and the cognitive decline associated with MRI-defined brain infarct Neurology, August 8, 2006; 67(3): 435 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Kwon, B. J. Kim, S.-H. Lee, S. H. Choi, B.-H. Oh, and B.-W. Yoon Metabolic Syndrome as an Independent Risk Factor of Silent Brain Infarction in Healthy People Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 466 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Leblanc, J. F. Meschia, D. T. Stuss, and V. Hachinski Genetics of Vascular Cognitive Impairment: The Opportunity and the Challenges Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 248 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Prins, E. J. van Dijk, T. den Heijer, S. E. Vermeer, J. Jolles, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, and M. M. B. Breteler Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory Brain, September 1, 2005; 128(9): 2034 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. den Heijer, L. J. Launer, N. D. Prins, E. J. van Dijk, S. E. Vermeer, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M.B. Breteler Association between blood pressure, white matter lesions, and atrophy of the medial temporal lobe Neurology, January 25, 2005; 64(2): 263 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. den Heijer, S. E Vermeer, E. J van Dijk, N. D Prins, P. J Koudstaal, C. M van Duijn, A. Hofman, and M. M. Breteler Alcohol intake in relation to brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in older persons without dementia Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2004; 80(4): 992 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Artero, H Tiemeier, N D Prins, R Sabatier, M M B Breteler, and K Ritchie Neuroanatomical localisation and clinical correlates of white matter lesions in the elderly J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 75(9): 1304 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liebetrau, B. Steen, G. F. Hamann, and I. Skoog Silent and Symptomatic Infarcts on Cranial Computerized Tomography in Relation to Dementia and Mortality: A Population-Based Study in 85-Year-Old Subjects Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1816 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Slowik, W. Turaj, T. Dziedzic, A. Haefele, J. Pera, M. T. Malecki, L. Glodzik-Sobanska, P. Szermer, D. A. Figlewicz, and A. Szczudlik DD genotype of ACE gene is a risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage Neurology, July 27, 2004; 63(2): 359 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Shumaker, C. Legault, L. Kuller, S. R. Rapp, L. Thal, D. S. Lane, H. Fillit, M. L. Stefanick, S. L. Hendrix, C. E. Lewis, et al. Conjugated Equine Estrogens and Incidence of Probable Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Postmenopausal Women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study JAMA, June 23, 2004; 291(24): 2947 - 2958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E J van Dijk, S E Vermeer, J C de Groot, J van de Minkelis, N D Prins, M Oudkerk, A Hofman, P J Koudstaal, and M M B Breteler Arterial oxygen saturation, COPD, and cerebral small vessel disease J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2004; 75(5): 733 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L.P. Giele, T. D. Witkamp, W. P.T.M. Mali, Y. van der Graaf, and for the SMART Study Group Silent Brain Infarcts in Patients With Manifest Vascular Disease Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 742 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Kim, B. O. Choi, W. S. Jung, Y. J. Choi, and K. G. Choi Hyperhomocysteinemia as an independent risk factor for silent brain infarction Neurology, December 9, 2003; 61(11): 1595 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Denson Commentary: Help! Grandma's Stroking: Balancing Morbidity and Mortality in the Treatment of Hypertension Among the Very Old J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2003; 58(7): M660 - 661. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Pohl, D. L. Filion, and S. H. Kim Effects of Practice and Unpredictable Distractors on Planning and Executing Aiming after Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2003; 17(2): 93 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kohara, M. Fujisawa, F. Ando, Y. Tabara, N. Niino, T. Miki, and H. Shimokata MTHFR Gene Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Silent Brain Infarcts and White Matter Lesions in the Japanese General Population: The NILS-LSA Study Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1130 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Vermeer, M. Hollander, E. J. van Dijk, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M.B. Breteler Silent Brain Infarcts and White Matter Lesions Increase Stroke Risk in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1126 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Vermeer, N. D. Prins, T. den Heijer, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M.B. Breteler Silent Brain Infarcts and the Risk of Dementia and Cognitive Decline N. Engl. J. Med., March 27, 2003; 348(13): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |