Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:2433-2437
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000032246.85531.8E
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meves, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Postert, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meves, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Postert, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2002;33:2433.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Comparison Between Echo Contrast Agent-Specific Imaging Modes and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Brain Perfusion

Saskia H. Meves, MD; Wilko Wilkening, MSc; Tammo Thies, BA; Jens Eyding, MD; Thilo Hölscher, MD; Michael Finger, PhD; Gebhard Schmid, MD; Helmut Ermert, PhD Thomas Postert, MD for the Ruhr Center of Competence for Medical Engineering

From the Departments of Neurology (S.H.M., T.T., J.E., M.F., T.P.), Electrical Engineering (W.W., H.E.), and Radiology (G.S.), Ruhr University, Bochum, and Department of Neurology, University Regensburg, Regensburg (T.H.), Germany.

Correspondence to Dr T. Postert, MD, Department of Neurology, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus, Kiesau 14, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany. E-mail t.postert{at}vincenz.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterial and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Contrast burst imaging (CBI) and time variance imaging (TVI) are new ultrasonic imaging modes enabling the visualization of intravenously injected echo contrast agents in brain parenchyma. The aim of this study was to compare the quantitative ultrasonic data with corresponding perfusion-weighted MRI data (p-MRI) with respect to the assessment of brain perfusion.

Methods— Twelve individuals with no vascular abnormalities were examined by CBI and TVI after an intravenous bolus injection of 4 g galactose-based microbubble suspension (Levovist) in a concentration of 400 mg/mL. Complementary, a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, ie, p-MRI, of each individual was obtained. In both ultrasound (US) methods and p-MRI, time-intensity curves were calculated offline, and absolute time to peak intensities (TPI), peak intensities (PI), and peak width (PW) of US investigations and TPI, relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and relative cerebral blood volume (CBV) of p-MRI examinations were determined in the following regions of interest (ROIs): lentiform nucleus (LN), white matter (WM), posterior (PT), and anterior thalamus (AT). In addition, the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was evaluated in the US, and the precentral gyrus (PG) was examined in the p-MRI examinations. In relation to a reference parenchymal ROI (AT), relative TPIs were compared between the US and p-MRI methods and relative PI of US investigations with the ratio of CBF (rCBF) of p-MRI examinations in identical ROIs.

Results— Mean TPIs varied from 18.3±5.0 (AT) to 20.1± 5.8 (WM) to 17.2±4.9 (MCA) seconds in CBI examinations and from 19.4±5.3 (AT) to 20.4±4.3 (WM) to 17.3±4.0 (MCA) seconds in TVI examinations. Mean PIs were found to vary from 581.9±342.4 (WM) to 1522.9±574.2 (LN) to 3400.9± 621.7 arbitrary units (MCA) in CBI mode and from 7.5±4.6 (WM) to 17.5±4.9 (LN) to 46.3±7.1 (MCA) arbitrary units in TVI mode. PW ranged from 7.3±4.5 (AT) to 9.1±4.0 (LN) to 24.3±12.8 (MCA) seconds in CBI examinations and from 7.1±3.9 (AT) to 8.7±3.5 (LN) to 26.7±18.2 (MCA) seconds in TVI examinations. Mean TPI was significantly shorter and mean PI and mean PW were significantly higher in the MCA compared with all other ROIs (P<0.05). Mean TPI of the p-MRI examinations ranged from 22.0±6.9 (LN) to 23.0±6.8 (WM) seconds; mean CBF ranged from 0.0093± 0.0041 (LN) to 0.0043±0.0021 (WM). There was no significant difference in rTPI in any ROI between US and p-MRI measurements (P>0.2), whereas relative PIs were significantly higher in areas with lower insonation depth such as the LN compared with rCBF.

Conclusions— In contrast to PI, TPI and rTPI in US techniques are robust parameters for the evaluation of cerebral perfusion and may help to differentiate physiological and pathological perfusion in different parenchymal regions of the brain.


Key Words: contrast media • magnetic resonance imaging, perfusion-weighted • perfusion • ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterial and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In recent years, there have been advances in ultrasound (US) technology enabling the identification of perfusion in a variety of parenchymal organs.1,2 The discovery that contrast microbubbles resonate and create backscatter signals not only at the fundamental (transmitted) frequency but also at multiples (harmonics) of this frequency is used in harmonic imaging because tissue produces a smaller harmonic signal than contrast microspheres.3,4 Various studies have shown that transcranial harmonic imaging enables identification of parenchymal cerebral echo contrast enhancement under physiological and pathological conditions.510 More recently, it has been observed that diagnostic US transmitted at high energy levels may destroy or modify the morphology of microbubbles. These changes in microbubble shape and size are reflected in the amplitude and spectral energy distribution of the ultrasonic echoes so that short sequences of 6 to 10 pulses per line can reveal the presence of microbubbles. The changes are then detected as broadband noise in the Doppler spectrum (contrast-burst imaging [CBI]) or as characteristic features of microbubbles using dedicated algorithms (time variance imaging [TVI]). The result of the detection is preferably displayed in color-coded US images.11 In 2 pilot studies, it has been shown that echo contrast-specific imaging modes exploiting this phenomenon, like CBI and TVI, are sensitive techniques for the identification of parenchymal microbubble distribution in the brain.12,13 A major disadvantage that all US techniques have in common is the fact that physical properties like nonlinear relationship between microbubble concentration and optic intensities14 and the depth-dependent attenuation of the received harmonic signals make absolute quantification of peak intensities (PIs) impossible.

Furthermore, the diagnostic value of different US parameters is unknown because there has been no comparative study between US techniques and reference methods. Validated indicators of absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) are PET15 and xenon CT.16 Perfusion-weighted MRI (p-MRI) provides semiquantitative information of brain perfusion that can be easily compared with recently developed US perfusion methods. The present study was designed to evaluate the reliability of quantitative parameters of US brain perfusion examinations compared with corresponding p-MRI data.


*    Material and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Material and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
Twelve patients (8 women, 4 men; mean age, 38.3 years; range, 26 to 50 years) without history of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease with adequate acoustic temporal bone window were included in the present study after informed consent was obtained. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, galactosemia, abnormal extracranial and transcranial color-coded real-time sonography, abnormalities in T1- and T2-weighted MRI examinations, and pathological blood pressure or pulse rates. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Ultrasound Examinations
Routine Color-Coded Duplex Examination of the Extracranial and Intracranial Brain-Supplying Vessels and CBV Measurements
We performed all examinations using a Siemens Sonoline Elegra US system (Siemens Medical Systems, Inc, Ultrasound Group) equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer for the extracranial arteries and a 2.5-MHz phased-array transducer for the intracranial vessels. For diagnosis of an occlusion or a high-grade stenosis, criteria identical to those in previously published studies were used.17,18 In all patients, CBF volume was calculated according to Schöning and Scheel.19 CBF volume was determined as the sum of the flow volumes of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries of both sides.

Physical Principle of CBI and TVI
CBI and TVI have been introduced in a recently published article.13 Briefly, both US techniques exploit the fact that microbubbles undergo partial or complete destruction or splitting when exposed to a high-energy ultrasound field. CBI, which is derived from power Doppler, uses short sequences of typically 6 broadband pulses with an elevated output power level to minimize acquisition time, improve axial resolution, and optimize microbubble destruction. Processes associated with the destruction of microbubbles produce broadband noise in the Doppler spectrum that partially passes the wall filter and can be displayed color coded as in conventional power Doppler. These signals can be obtained even from nonmoving or very slowly moving microbubbles and are consequently associated with perfusion. TVI uses a different processing of the echo data. This technique extracts the amplitude and spectral slope from 10 echoes acquired per beam line. The spectral slope is a parameter describing the symmetry of the power spectrum with respect to the center frequency. Both parameters, amplitude and spectral slope, will vary over time if the multiple insonifications alter the structure of the microbubbles. TVI identifies characteristic variation using a stochastic model for bubble destruction and then quantifies these variations.

Protocol of the Examination With Echo Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes
US examinations were performed unilaterally with the transtemporal approach. An axial diencephalic plane was adjusted by slightly tilting the transducer toward the parietal lobe. The third ventricle, adjacent hypoechogenic thalamus, and frontal horns of the lateral ventricles were orientation landmarks. Complementarily, visualization of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) after echo contrast agent injection ensured the correct position in the diencephalic plane. Mechanical indexes were <1.5 and <1.0 for CBI and TVI examinations, respectively. After application of the echo contrast agent, series of 50 to 70 images were acquired at a frame rate of 0.5 Hz. The field of view was set to an imaging depth of 10 cm; the sector angle was 90°. CBI and TVI examinations of the ipsilateral brain hemisphere were performed; the time interval between both investigations was at least 30 minutes to ensure that all microbubbles were removed from the circulation. All examinations were performed with the left-sided temporal approach and were digitally recorded and evaluated offline.

Physical Properties and Application Mode of the Echo Contrast Agent
In all examinations, 4 g of a galactose-based microbubble suspension (Levovist, Schering AG) in a concentration of 400 mg/mL was injected into a venous access with a standardized size (18 to 20 gauge) and localization (antecubital vein) by means of an US power injector (Medrad Inc) at a rate of 8 mL/s. Levovist consists of air bubbles surrounded by a galactose shell and stabilized by palmitic acid. Mean particle size is 2.0 to 4.5 µm; 97% of the microbubbles are <10 µm.

Evaluation of Quantitative Parameters
Regional cerebral echo contrast enhancement was quantified using time-intensity curves (TIC). Peak intensities (PIs), time to peak intensities (TPIs), and peak widths (PW, or the width of the TIC at a 90% value of the PI) were calculated from a model function that was fitted to the measured curve in at least mean square sense. The model function has been described earlier.13 Unlike filter approaches, it does not disregard any of the information in the measurements but incorporates knowledge on the expected signal. Quantitative data were calculated for the following manually placed regions of interest (ROIs): in the ipsilateral hemisphere, posterior parts of the thalamus (ROIa), anterior parts of the thalamus (ROIb), lentiform nucleus (ROIc), white matter (ROId), and MCA (M2 segment; ROIe) (see Figure 1). Finally, parameter images for TPI, PI, and PW were formed by dividing each image within a series into 1x1-mm regions. Extracted data from corresponding regions were displayed in a color-coded parameter image for each individual. Mean values and SD of TPI, PI, and PW were calculated.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Basic gray-scale image in axial diencephalic plane with visualization of the third ventricle (black arrow) and frontal horns of the lateral ventricle (yellow arrow) as orientation landmarks. Projection of the ROIs: posterior parts of the thalamus (a), anterior parts of the thalamus (b), lentiform nucleus (c), white matter (d), and M2 segment of the MCA (e).

MRI Examinations
Protocol
Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, ie, p-MRI, based on the acquisition of the signal time course after bolus administration of contrast medium was performed on a 1.5-T whole-body Magnetom Symphony Quantum (Siemens AG) scanner equipped with a gradient overdrive using the standard head coil. After conventional T1- and T2-weighted imaging, a gradient-echo echoplanar imaging sequence (echo time, 45 ms; repetition time, 1500 ms; slice thickness, 6 mm; field of view, 250 mm; acquisition matrix, 128x128) was chosen for perfusion imaging. Then, 0.2 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg body weight was injected through an 18-gauge venous access into an antecubital vein by means of a MRI power injector (Medrad Inc) at a rate of 10 mL/s. Data aquisition (acquisition time, 75 seconds) of the 50 images for each of the 9 slices (image frequency, 0.67 Hz) started simultaneously with the contrast injection.

Postprocessing and Image Analysis
All data were transferred to a 3-dimensional Virtuoso CT/MR Workstation (Siemens AG) and postprocessed with MEDx 3.3 software (Sensor Systems Inc). All raw p-MRI data were processed on a pixel-by-pixel basis to generate maps of the TPI, relative CBF, and relative CBV. To avoid confusion about terminology and to guarantee the distinction to the ratios (see below), the relative CBF will be referred to as CBF and the relative CBV as CBV in the following text. Model-independent deconvolution of the tissue curves with an automatic arterial input function20 to yield the residue function via singular value decomposition21 was used to calculate CBF. CBV maps were created by fitting the first-pass concentration-time curves to a {gamma}-variate function22 and then integrating the fitted curve.

ROI analyses of TPI, CBF, and CBV were performed unilaterally according to the US examinations in the following manually placed regions: posterior parts of the thalamus (ROIa), anterior parts of the thalamus (ROIb), lentiform nucleus (ROIc), white matter adjacent to the lentiform nucleus (ROId), and precentral gyrus (ROIf). Mean values and SD of these parameters were calculated.

All data of the US and p-MRI examinations were obtained by the same investigator (S.M.) to achieve identical localized ROIs in the examinations.

Comparison Between US and p-MRI Examinations
For comparison of the TPI in US and p-MRI examinations, the TPI of ROIb (thalamus anterior) was subtracted from the TPI in each other ROI to obtain relative TPI (rTPI). This procedure was chosen to reduce the variance of data induced by different US and p-MRI examinations settings; eg, noisy p-MRI examinations under claustrophobic conditions are more likely to produce tachycardia and elevated blood pressure, hence influencing blood circulation times. The anterior thalamus was selected as reference region because of its favorable insonation angle in mid parts of the ultrasonic beam and its clearly depicted neighboring anatomical structures such as the third ventricle in transcranial B-mode images.

A t test for paired samples was used to compare rTPI of US with p-MRI measurements.

PIs of the US studies were compared with CBFs of the p-MRI studies. US-PI represents the maximal intensity increase in gray-scale images caused by the echo contrast agent in a defined sample volume and is related to the maximum amount of contrast agent bubbles but also to, for example, insonation depth.5 CBF is a measure of the volume of blood delivered to the tissue in a given amount of time, and regional CBF, known as tissue perfusion, is proportional to the height of the tissue concentration-versus-time curve after a bolus23; therefore, regional CBF is related to PI. The ratios of the relative PI (rPI) and CBF (rCBF) of each ROI and the reference region ROIb, respectively, were calculated, and a t test for paired samples was applied to compare the US methods with the p-MRI examinations.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterial and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In all individuals, US and p-MRI examinations were successful, and no side effects occurred.

US Examinations
Mean bilateral blood flow volumes were 581±88 mL/min in the internal carotid arteries and 142±98 mL/min in the vertebral arteries. Mean global CBF volume was 722±114 mL/min. These results were in accordance with previously published data on cerebral blood volumes in young and healthy individuals.24

Parameter images of TPI and PI based on TICs were successfully calculated in all patients. In these color-coded single images, it was possible to identify the different parenchymal regions and the MCA by the echo contrast agent distribution (Figure 2). All results of the CBI and TVI examinations are given in Tables 1 and 2. Briefly, in CBI and TVI examinations, mean TPIs were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the MCA than in the parenchymal regions, and mean PI and mean PW were significantly higher (P< 0.05) in the MCA than in the parenchymal regions.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Parameter image of PIs in TVI mode. Red indicates high PIs; blue, low PIs. Highest signal increase was in the M2 segment of the MCA (white arrow).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Mean Values and SD of Quantitative Parameters in 12 CBI Examinations


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Mean Values and SD of Quantitative Parameters in 12 TVI Examinations

rTPI of ROIa was 0.26±0.70 and of ROId was 1.36±1.55 in CBI examinations; those values were 0.16± 1.62 and 1.56±1.38 in TVI examinations (see Table 4). rPI of ROIa was 1.08±0.49 in CBI and 0.97±0.37 in TVI; rPI of ROIc was 2.07±0.81 in CBI mode and 1.65±0.72 in TVI mode (see Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Comparison of rTPI in 12 CBI Versus p-MRI Examinations and in TVI Versus p-MRI Examinations


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Comparison of rPI in 12 CBI Versus rCBF in p-MRI Examinations and of rPI in TVI Versus rCBF in p-MRI Examinations

p-MRI Examinations
Mean TPI of p-MRI -examinations ranged between 22.0±6.9 (ROIc) and 23.0±6.8 (ROId) seconds, and mean CBF ranged between 0.0043±0.0021 (ROId) and 0.0125± 0.0056 (ROIf) (see Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Mean Values and SD of Quantitative Parameters in 12 p-MRI Examinations

rTPI varied between -0.47±1.01 (rROIc) and 1.05±0.99 (rROId); rCBF ranged between 1.13±0.24 (rROIc) and 0.53±0.13 (rROId). The CBF ratio of gray matter to white matter for ROIc and ROId was 2.23±0.57 and for ROIb and 1.97±0.55 ROId, which is in accordance with previous p-MRI and PET studies.15,23,25

Comparison Between US and p-MRI Examinations
No significant difference in rTPI of ROIa, ROIc, and ROId of the US and p-MRI-examinations could be shown (Table 4). The rPI and rCBF of ROIa demonstrated no significant difference between the US and p-MRI modes. However, rPIs of ROIc and ROId were significantly higher in US compared with rCBF in p-MRI-examinations (Table 5).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterial and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In various studies, p-MRI has been shown to visualize ischemic brain parenchyma in acute stroke patients.26 However MRI is intolerable in critical ill patients because it is time consuming and is not generally available in the community and its running costs are high. In contrast, US is an easily available bedside method. Various US studies exploiting harmonic signals or signals resulting from destruction of microbubbles were able to demonstrate physiological and pathological brain tissue perfusion.5 10 Standard parameters, however, for the analysis of TICs of US perfusion studies such as PI and area under the curve could be evaluated only qualitatively13,27,28 because of specific physical properties such as depth-dependent attenuation of the ultrasound signals, inhomogeneous temporal bone window, and nonlinear relation between echo contrast concentration and video intensity.13,14,2729 From an in vitro study, 29 it is known that TPI in US perfusion examinations may provide a more robust parameter. In only 1 previously published study,13 TPI was examined in different brain regions and revealed intraindividual homogeneous values in different brain regions consistent with our present findings. In accordance with all previously published US studies, we observed a marked depth-dependent decrease in PI in TVI and CBI examinations, whereas TPI was not influenced by the insonation depth, which supports an in vivo study by Bos et al.30 Hereby, a quantitative comparison of ROIs is possible. The characteristic time delay between a branch of a major artery and parenchyma found in our study is a further criterion that helps to characterize physiological brain perfusion.

Even though TPI is influenced by various factors such as heart rate, heart ejection fraction, and position of the venous canula, its potential to demonstrate hemodynamic impairment of cerebral perfusion in conditions of acute stroke has been shown in p-MRI.31 This is the first study to compare p-MRI with US perfusion studies. We found no significant differences between rTPI in US and MRI examinations in any ROI, thus supporting the robustness and reliability of this parameter.

In contrast, rPIs were highly depth dependent and had a high interindividual variability in all ROIs compared with corresponding rCBF in p-MRI examinations. This finding is in accordance with all previously published studies on the ultrasonic assessment of brain perfusion and confirms that this parameter is not suitable for quantification of perfusion.

In return, PW as another diagnostic parameter has not been regarded in previous ultrasonic studies. The PW was significantly higher in the M2 segment than in the parenchymal ROIs because destroyed microbubbles in large vessels are rapidly replaced. These characteristic features of TICs allow the differentiation of vessels and brain parenchyma. In future US perfusion studies on acute stroke patients, shortened PW might be a hint for the diagnosis of impaired perfusion.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that TPI provides a reliable parameter in US perfusion examinations because it is not as depth dependent as other parameters like PI. Previously published p-MRI studies in acute stroke patients demonstrated the diagnostic value of TPI maps for differentiation between unaffected parenchyma, penumbra, and ischemic core area. From the results of this study, future US studies should include TPI maps in stroke patients to investigate the potential for a semiquantitative differentiation between affected and unaffected tissue. Additionally, these studies should be compared with other quantitative techniques that assess brain perfusion like p-MRI.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was done for KMR (Kompetenzzentrum Medizintechnik Ruhr) and supported by FoRUM (Forschungszentrum der Ruhr-Universität Medizinische Fakultät). W.W. was supported by BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung).

Received February 25, 2002; revision received May 30, 2002; accepted May 31, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterial and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Hancock J, Dittrich H, Jewitt DE, Monaghan MJ. Evaluation of myocardial, hepatic and renal perfusion in a variety of clinical conditions using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent (Optison) and second harmonic imaging. Heart. 1999; 81: 636–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Porter TR, Li S, Jiang L, Grayburn P, Deligonul U. Real-time visualization of myocardial perfusion and wall thickening in human beings with intravenous ultrasonographic contrast and accelerated intermittent harmonic imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999; 12: 266–271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Burns PN. Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. Clin Radiol. 1996; 51 (suppl 1): 50–55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Schwarz KQ, Chen X, Steinmetz S, Phillips D. Harmonic imaging with Levovist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10: 1–10.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Seidel G, Greis CH, Sonne J, Kaps M. Harmonic grey scale imaging of the human brain. J Neuroimaging. 1999; 9: 171–174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Federlein J, Postert T, Meves S, Weber S, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Ultrasonic evaluation of pathological brain perfusion in acute stroke using second harmonic imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 69: 616–622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Postert T, Muhs A, Meves S, Federlein J, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Transient response harmonic imaging: an ultrasound technique related to brain perfusion. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1901–1907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Postert T, Federlein J, Weber S, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Second harmonic imaging in acute middle cerebral artery infarction: preliminary results. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1702–1706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Seidel G, Algermissen C, Christoph A, Claassen L, Vidal-Langwasser M, Katzer T. Harmonic imaging of the human brain: visualization of brain perfusion with ultrasound. Stroke. 2000; 31: 151–154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wiesmann M, Seidel G. Ultrasound perfusion imaging of the human brain. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2421–2425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wilkening W, Lazenby JC, Ermert H. A new method for detecting echoes from microbubble contrast agent based on time-variance. Proc IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. 1998; 1823–1826.
  12. Postert T, Hoppe P, Federlein J, Przuntek H, Büttner T, Helbeck S, Ermert H, Wilkening W. Ultrasonic assessment of brain perfusion. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1460–1462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Postert T, Hoppe P, Federlein J, Helbeck S, Ermert H, Przuntek H, Büttner T, Wilkening W. Contrast agent specific imaging modes for the ultrasonic assessment of parenchymal cerebral echo contrast enhancement. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 1709–1716.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Wiencek JG, Feinstein SB, Walker R, Aronson S. Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantitation of perfusion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993; 6: 395–416.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Healy MJR, Gibbs JM, Wise RJS, Hatazawa J, Herold S, Beaney RP, Brooks DJ, Spinks T, Rhodes C, Frackowiak RSJ, Jones T. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization: normal values and effect of age. Brain. 1990; 113: 27–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yonas H. The xenon/computed tomography cerebral blood flow method: clouded past, clear present, bright future. In: Tomonaga M, Tanaka A, Yonas H, eds. Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements Using Stable Xenon/CT: Clinical Applications. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995: 1–11.
  17. de Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantification of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995; 5: 414–426.[CrossRef]
  18. Görtler M, Niethammer R, Widder B. Differentiating subtotal carotid artery stenoses from occlusions by colour-coded duplex sonography. J Neurol. 1994; 241: 301–305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Schöning M, Scheel M. Color duplex measurements of cerebral blood flow volume: intra- and interobserver reproducibility and habituation to serial measurements in normal subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 523–531.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Morris ED, VanMeter JW, Tasciyan TA, Maisog JM, Zeffiro TA. Automated determination of the arterial input function for quantitative MR perfusion analysis. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med. 2000; 8: 740.Abstract.
  21. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages, part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 36: 715–725.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Thompson HK Jr, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res. 1963; 14: 502–515.
  23. Wirestam R, Andersson L, Ostergaard L, Bolling M, Aunola J-P, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Holtas S, Stahlberg F. Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 43: 691–700.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Scheel P, Ruge C, Petruch UR, Schöning M. Color duplex measurement of cerebral blood flow volume in healthy adults. Stroke. 2000; 31: 147–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1994; 193: 637–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Keir SL, Wardlaw JM. Systematic review of diffusion and perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2723–2731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Postert T, Federlein J, Rose J, Przuntek H, Weber S, Büttner T. Ultrasonic assessment of physiological echo-contrast agent distribution in brain parenchyma with transient response second harmonic imaging. J Neuroimaging. 2001; 11: 18–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Seidel G, Algermissen C, Christoph A, Katzer T, Kaps M. Visualization of brain perfusion with harmonic gray scale and power Doppler technology: an animal pilot study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1728–1734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Bos LJ, Piek JJ, Spaan JAE. Background subtraction from time-intensity curves in videodensitometry: a pitfall in flow assessment using contrast echocardiography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995; 21: 1211–1218.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Bos LJ, Piek JJ, Vergroesen I, Spaan JAE. Confounding effects of myocardial background intensity and attenuation in contrast echocardiography: an in vivo study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999; 25: 1177–1184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Neumann-Haefelin T, Wittsack HJ, Wenserski F, Siebler M, Seitz RJ, Modder U, Freund HJ. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI: the DWI/PWI mismatch in acute stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1591–1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. Duerschmied, L. Olson, M. Olschewski, A. Rossknecht, G. Freund, C. Bode, and C. Hehrlein
Contrast ultrasound perfusion imaging of lower extremities in peripheral arterial disease: a novel diagnostic method
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Holscher, W. Wilkening, B. Draganski, S. H. Meves, J. Eyding, H. Voit, U. Bogdahn, H. Przuntek, and T. Postert
Transcranial Ultrasound Brain Perfusion Assessment With a Contrast Agent-Specific Imaging Mode: Results of a Two-Center Trial
Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2283 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meves, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Postert, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meves, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Postert, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.