Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:2485-2491
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000030317.43597.C8
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroprotectors
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2002;33:2485.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Neuroprotective Effects of a Novel Non–Receptor-Binding Estrogen Analogue

In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis

Ran Liu, MD; Shao-Hua Yang, MD; Evelyn Perez, BS; Kun Don Yi, MS; Samuel S. Wu, PhD; Kathleen Eberst, BS; Laszlo Prokai, PhD; Katalin Prokai-Tatrai, PhD; Zu Yun Cai, PhD; Douglas F. Covey, PhD; Arthur L. Day, MD James W. Simpkins, PhD

From the Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Health Science Center at Fort Worth, University of North Texas (R.L., S-H.Y., E.P., K.D., J.W.S.); Department of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville (E.P., K.E., K.P-T.); Department of Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, and Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center for Excellence, Gainesville, Fla (S.S.W.); Center for Drug Discovery, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville (L.P.); Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville (A.L.D.); and Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Mo (Z.Y.C., D.F.C.).

Correspondence to Dr James W. Simpkins, Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Health Science Center at Fort Worth, University of North Texas, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107. E-mail jsimpkin{at}hsc.unt.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Although estrogens are neuroprotective, hormonal effects limit their clinical application. Estrogen analogues with neuroprotective function but lacking hormonal properties would be more attractive. The present study was undertaken to determine the neuroprotective effects of a novel 2-adamantyl estrogen analogue, ZYC3.

Methods— Cytotoxicity was induced in HT-22 cells by 10 mmol/L glutamate. 17ß-Estradiol (E2) or ZYC3 was added immediately before the exposure to glutamate. Cell viability was determined by calcein assay. The binding of E2 and ZYC3 to human {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and ß (ERß) estrogen receptors was determined by ligand competition binding assay. Ischemia/reperfusion injury was induced by temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). E2 or ZYC3 (100 µg/kg) was administered 2 hours or immediately before MCAO, respectively. Infarct volume was determined by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Cerebral blood flow was recorded during and within 30 minutes after MCAO by a hydrogen clearance method.

Results— ZYC3 significantly decreased toxicity of glutamate with a potency 10-fold that of E2. ZYC3 did not bind to either ER{alpha} or ERß. Infarct volume was significantly reduced to 122.4±17.6 and 83.1±19.3 mm3 in E2 and ZYC3 groups, respectively, compared with 252.6±15.6 mm3 in the ovariectomized group. During MCAO, both E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased cerebral blood flow in the nonischemic side, while no significant differences were found in the ischemic side. However, E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased cerebral blood flow in both sides within 30 minutes after reperfusion.

Conclusions— Our study shows that ZYC3, a non–receptor-binding estrogen analogue, possesses both neuroprotective and vasoactive effects, which offers the possibility of clinical application for stroke without the side effects of estrogens. It also suggests that both the neuroprotective and vasoactive effects of estrogen are receptor independent.


Key Words: cerebral blood flow • estrogens • ischemia • neuroprotection • receptors, estrogen • reperfusion injury


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Neuroprotective agents and strategies have been studied for years and appear to be effective in a variety of stroke models. One of the major focuses in the last decade has been related to the activities of estrogens. Sex differences in the incidence and outcome of stroke suggest that hormonal factors may influence the development and outcome of stroke.1,2 Estrogens have been found to be associated with a decreased risk, delayed onset, and progression of stroke and enhanced recovery from numerous traumatic and chronic neurological and mental diseases.3 Various lines of clinical and experimental evidence have shown that both endogenous and exogenous estrogens exert neuroprotective effects.3,4 The protective effects of estrogens have been widely reported in different types of neuronal cells against various toxicities, including serum deprivation, oxidative stress, amyloid ß peptide, and excitotoxicity.4 Furthermore, estrogens can decrease ischemia/reperfusion injury in animal studies.5,6

Although estrogens have been shown to be neuroprotective in both female and male rodent stroke models,7 the feminizing effects limit their clinical application. Clinical trials have been limited to postmenopausal women because of problems in separating the cerebrovascular effects of estrogens from estrogenic effects on the peripheral estrogen-responsive tissues. In addition, both postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives have been found to increase the risk for venous and arterial thrombosis,8,9 which has been shown to be related to the adverse events of the Heart and Estrogen-progestin Replacement Study (HERS).10 The prothrombotic effect of estrogens may contribute to the negative results found in the HERS and the Women’s Estrogen for Stroke Trial.10,11 Many biological effects of estrogens are mediated by classic estrogen receptors (ERs), while ER-independent neuroprotection has been described.4 Therefore, non–receptor-binding estrogen analogues, which preserve the neuroprotective effects but lack estrogenic activity in the peripheral estrogen-responsive tissue, could be applied in both females and males. In the present study a new derivative of estrone, 2-adamantyl-estra-1,3,5 (10)-trien-3-ol-17-one (ZYC3), was synthesized (Figure 1), evaluated for ER binding, and assessed for its neuroprotective effects in both a neuronal cell culture model and in a rodent transient focal ischemia model. Because estrogens have been shown to be a vasorelaxant, we assessed the effects of this novel estrogen analogue on regional cerebral blood flow (CBF).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Structural representation of 17ß-estradiol and the novel estrogen analogue 2-adamantyl-estra-1,3,5 (10)-trien-3-ol-17-one (ZYC3).


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Synthesis of ZYC3 and Preparation of Steroid
ZYC3 was prepared as described previously.12 Estrone (270 mg, 1 mmol) and 1-adamantanol (170 mg, 1 mmol) were added to anhydrous n-pentane (6 mL), and the mixture was cooled with an ice bath. Boron trifluoride etherate (BF3 · EtOEt, 0.4 mL) was added over a 10-minute period. After an additional 15 minutes, the ice bath was removed, and stirring was continued for an additional 45 minutes at room temperature. During the 45 minutes, the solid present in the reaction mixture was dissolved, and yellow oil formed. Crushed ice was then added while the reaction flask was shaken and swirled, and pink solid was formed. The filtered crude product was washed with water until the filtrate had a neutral pH, and the solid was dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C. The crude powder was purified by flash chromatography from contamination of other steroids (silica gel eluted with 20% ethyl acetate in hexanes). The product was recrystallized from a mixture of chloroform and isopropyl alcohol and had the following: melting point 322°C to 324°C, literature melting point 295°C to 296°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) {delta} 0.91 (s, 3H, C18-CH3), 2.8 (m, 2H, C6-CH2), 4.71 (s, 1H, C3-OH), 6.42 (s, 1H, aromatic H), 7.15 (s, 1H, aromatic H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) {delta} 13.76, 21.47, 25.93, 26.42, 28.63, 28.95 (3xC), 31.56, 35.81, 36.56, 36.98 (3xC), 38.42, 40.70 (3xC), 44.25, 48.00, 50.35, 116.87, 124.11, 131.59, 134.00, 135.02, 152.44, 221.43.

Steroids (Steraloids, Inc) were dissolved in absolute ethanol and then diluted to appropriate concentrations in culture media or assay buffer for cell culture or receptor-binding assays, respectively. For subcutaneous injection, 17ß-estradiol (E2) and ZYC3 were dissolved in absolute ethanol and then dissolved in corn oil at a concentration of 100 µg/mL. To achieve a formulation that is aqueous soluble and therefore suitable for intravenous administration, ZYC3 was dissolved in aqueous 30% 2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HPßCD) solution at a concentration of 100 µg/mL.

Ligand Competition Assay of ER Binding
Fifty microliters of 2,4,6,7-3H-ßE2 (NEN Life Science Products, Inc) and 100 µL of recombinant human ER{alpha} or ERß (Affinity Bioreagents, Inc) were incubated in ER binding buffer (20 mmol/L Tris, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 400 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, pH 7.8) for 75 minutes at 29°C either with no added steroid (total binding), 2 µL 1 mmol/L diethylstilbestrol (nonspecific binding; Steraloids), or 50 µL 0.001 to 10 nmol/L ßE2 or ZYC3. Bound and unbound radioligands were separated with the use of Sephadex G25 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) columns (0.5-mL bed volume) with a 1-mL elution volume. Scintillation fluid was added, and counts were determined.

Effects of E2 and ZYC3 on Glutamate Toxicity in HT-22 Cells
HT-22 cells (Salk Institute) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum (HyClone) and 20 µg/mL gentamycin under standard cell culture conditions. HT-22 cells (passages 18 to 25) were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells per well. E2 or ZYC3 was added at concentrations ranging from 1 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L immediately before the addition of glutamate. Glutamate was diluted to a final concentration of 10 mmol/L in culture media.

Cells were exposed to steroid and glutamate for approximately 14 hours, then cell viability was determined by calcein AM assay (Molecular Probes). Wells were rinsed with PBS, after which 25 µmol/L calcein AM in PBS was added. After incubation at room temperature for 15 minutes, fluorescence was determined (excitation 485, emission 530). All data were normalized to percent kill.

Experimental Animals
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (weight, 250 g; Charles River, Wilmington, Mass) were acclimatized for 3 days before surgery. Bilateral ovariectomy was performed 2 weeks before middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). All animal procedures were approved by the University of North Texas Health Science Center Animal Care and Use Committee.

Ischemic stroke was induced by MCAO as described before.13 Briefly, animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (60 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Rectal temperature was maintained at 37.5±0.5°C during the procedure. The left femoral artery was canalized and connected to a blood pressure monitor for mean arterial blood pressure monitoring. The left MCA was occluded by a 3-0 monofilament suture introduced via the internal carotid artery. After 1 hour, the suture was withdrawn for reperfusion. Blood samples were taken before, 30 minutes during, and 30 minutes after MCAO. Physiological parameters were measured by an ISTAT clinical analyzer.

Animals were decapitated 24 hours after reperfusion. Brains were harvested, and 7 slices were made at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 mm posterior to the olfactory bulb. Slices were incubated for 30 minutes in a 2% solution of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride at 37°C and then fixed in 10% formalin. The stained slices were photographed and subsequently measured for ischemic lesion volume (Image-Pro Plus 4.1, Media Cybernetics).

A hydrogen clearance blood flowmeter (Unique Medical Co) was used for CBF measurement. Two electrodes were stereotaxically inserted into caudate putamen of the ischemic and contralateral side (posterior bregma 0.5 mm, 4 mm lateral and 5 mm depth).

Protocol 1: Effect of ZYC3 on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Using Corn Oil as Vehicle
E2 and ZYC3, dissolved in corn oil, were injected subcutaneously (100 µg/kg) 2 hours before MCAO in each group, respectively. An equivalent dose of vehicle was administered subcutaneously 2 hours before MCAO in ovariectomized females as control (n=4 to 6 per group).

Protocol 2: Effect of ZYC3 on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Using 30% HPßCD as Vehicle
ZYC3 (100 µg/kg) in HPßCD was administered through the jugular vein immediately before MCAO (ZYC3 group; n=7). E2 (100 µg/kg) in corn oil was injected subcutaneously in ovariectomized females 2 hours before MCAO (E2 group; n=15). In controls, ovariectomized females (OVX group; n=14) were treated with equivalent volumes of corn oil (subcutaneously) at 2 hours before and 30% HPßCD (intravenously) immediately before MCAO.

Protocol 3: Effect of E2 and ZYC3 on CBF During Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
MCAO was induced in 16 rats (OVX, n=5; ZYC3, n=6; E2, n=5) in a separate study. Mean arterial blood pressure, pH, PO2, PCO2, Na+, K+, hemoglobin, HCO3, SO2, and total carbon dioxide (TCO2) were monitored before, 30 minutes during, and 30 minutes after MCAO. E2 was dissolved in corn oil and injected subcutaneously (100 µg/kg) 2 hours before MCAO in the E2 group. In the ZYC3 group, ZYC3 (100 µg/kg) in HPßCD was administered through the jugular vein immediately before MCAO. CBF was recorded at 30 minutes during MCAO and at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after reperfusion.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM. Cell death, ischemic volumes, and physiological parameters in each group were compared by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests. For CBF we used a linear mixed model (SAS PROC mixed; SAS Institute) to evaluate mean differences in treatment for each side of the brain.14,15 The effects of treatment, time, and treatment by time interaction were considered fixed, while the response of animals was treated as random. This model took into consideration repeated-measures data (multiple CBF measurements were made for each rat), the inhomogeneous variance of CBF at 4 different time points, and the variation among rats. Linear contrast tests were used to distinguish treatment groups at specific time points. The difference for each comparison was considered significant at the P<0.05 level.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ligand Competition for Estrogen Receptor Binding
In competition binding experiments, ZYC3 showed very low affinity for both ER{alpha} and ERß within the indicated concentrations (Figure 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Competition binding curve of ZYC3 and E2 for human recombinant ER{alpha} and human recombinant ERß. No binding affinity of ZYC3 to either ER{alpha} or ERß was indicated.

Effect of E2 and ZYC3 on Glutamate Toxicity in HT-22 Cells
The EC50 values for neuroprotection against a 10-mmol/L glutamate challenge for ZYC3 and E2 were 0.16 and 1.90 µmol/L, respectively, suggesting that ZYC3 was 10-fold more potent than E2. With exposure of HT-22 cells to 10 mmol/L glutamate for 14 hours, 1 µmol/L ZYC3 ameliorated glutamate toxicity by 70%, while 1 µmol/L E2 decreased cell death by 10% (Figure 3).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Concentration-response curves for E2 and ZYC3 on glutamate toxicity in HT-22 cells. *P<0.05 vs 17ßE2 (E2) group.

Effect of E2 and ZYC3 on Ischemic Lesion Volume
ZYC3 was not neuroprotective when injected subcutaneously 2 hours before MCAO with corn oil used as vehicle. The lesion volumes were 238.1±23.9, 128.5±24.3, and 274.2±31.4 mm3 in OVX, E2, and ZYC3 groups, respectively (Figure 4).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, Effect of E2 and ZYC3 (100 µg/kg), dissolved in corn oil, on ischemic lesion volume of MCAO. *P<0.05 vs OVX and ZYC3 groups. B, Effect of ZYC3 (100 µg/kg) in 30% HPßCD and E2 on ischemic lesion volume of MCAO. **P<0.05 vs OVX group.

In view of the potent neuroprotection of ZYC3 seen in vitro and its high lipophilicity, we considered the possibility that the lack of in vivo neuroprotection with subcutaneous administration in oil may have been due to the lack of distribution of the compound from the injection site. To test this possibility, we complexed ZYC3 in HPßCD, creating a formulation that allowed aqueous solubility and rapid distribution through intravenous administration. The lesion volume was significantly reduced in the ZYC3 group when ZYC3 was administered intravenously in 30% HPßCD immediately before MCAO. The lesion volumes were 83.1±19.1, 122.4±17.6, and 252.6±15.6 mm3 in ZYC3, E2, and OVX groups, respectively (Figure 4)

Effect of E2 and ZYC3 on Physiological Parameters and CBF
Physiological parameters are shown in the Table. There were no significant differences among groups at comparable experimental time points. Regional CBF decreased to 8.5±1.3, 6.3±1.4, and 7.4±1.4 mL/min per 100 g tissue during MCAO in the ischemic side in the ZYC3, E2, and OVX groups, respectively. However, both E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased CBF in the nonischemic side during MCAO, which was 91.6±10.7 and 82.7±11.7 mL/min per 100 g tissue, respectively, compared with 48.0±11.7 mL/min per 100 g tissue in the OVX group. E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased CBF in both sides within 30 minutes after reperfusion (Figure 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Physiological Parameters Before, During, and After MCAO



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of E2 and ZYC3 on CBF. Both E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased CBF in the nonischemic side during MCAO. E2 and ZYC3 significantly increased CBF in both sides within 30 minutes after reperfusion. *P<0.05 vs OVX group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
A large number of reports have shown that E2, naturally occurring estrogen, exerts neuroprotective effects in a variety of in vitro and in vivo model systems.5,1620 Several synthesized estrogen analogues have also been reported to possess neuroprotective properties.13,16,18,21 The most essential structural motif that elicits estrogenic activity is a phenol that is relatively unhindered, attached to a rather bulky hydrophobic structure.22 Additionally, the neuroprotective function of estrogens has been shown to be related to the phenolic A ring of the steroid.23 Adamantyl modulation of phenol has been reported previously.24 In the present study an electron-donating, adamantyl moiety was introduced at the C-2 position on the A ring of the steroid. We anticipated that the bulky adamantyl group would decrease binding of the steroid to ERs. It was also anticipated that the bulky group would increase the ability of the steroid to scavenge free radicals derived from the reactive oxygen species. The effects of this novel analogue on ischemia/reperfusion injury were determined in both a neuronal cell culture model and a rodent MCAO model.

Oxidative stress is implicated in a number of neurological disorders, including stroke. HT-22 is an immortalized mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line, which lacks inotropic glutamate receptors.25 HT-22 cells have been used as a model of oxidative toxicity on exposure to glutamate.26 Exogenous glutamate blocks cysteine uptake in HT-22 cells via inhibition of the glutamate-cysteine antiporter, resulting in decreases in intracellular cysteine, which is 1 of the 3 peptides of glutathione. Depletion of glutathione leads to accumulation of reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ influx, ultimately resulting in cell death. The present study showed that both E2 and ZYC3 treatment ameliorated glutamate toxicity to HT-22 cells. With the free radical–scavenging adamantyl group, ZYC3 was more potent and efficacious than E2. Furthermore, because ZYC3 had very low affinity to either of the 2 known ERs and HT-22 cells lack functional ERs,27 classic ER-independent neuroprotective actions of E2 were suggested.

Consistent with our in vitro studies, both E2 and ZYC3 exert neuroprotective effects in focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. For the in vivo study, ZYC3 was ineffective in protecting against the insult when administered in corn oil. The logarithm of the 1-octanol/water partition coefficient (log P) estimated by an atom fragment method28 indicated that ZYC3 has a log P of 6.83 compared with 4.01 for E2. The extremely high lipophilicity indicated that ZYC3 should essentially accumulate in a lipid environment and would therefore remain in the injection site. The lack of effects of ZYC3 could be attributed to the inappropriate formulation method. To achieve a rapid delivery of ZYC3 into the circulation, ZYC3 was complexed with HPßCD. With this formulation, neuroprotective and vasoactive effects were clearly manifested.

Neuroprotective effects of E2 have been indicated at a very large range of concentrations in both in vitro and in vivo studies. In in vitro studies, the effective concentrations for E2-mediated neuroprotection range from low nanomolar (approximately 0.1 nmol/L) to high micromolar (approximately 50 µmol/L) concentrations.4 High physiological concentrations (low nmol/L) were sufficient to attenuate toxicity in a variety of cell types,4 while significantly higher pharmacological concentrations (low µmol/L) were required to lessen glutamate toxicity in HT-22 cells. In in vivo studies, neuroprotective properties of E2 have been observed in both low physiological and high pharmacological concentrations. A myriad of factors contribute to the vast differences in neuroprotection of E2 concentrations in vitro. In cell culture studies, differences in cell type, culturing conditions, cell density, and media components may contribute to the wide range of protective concentrations. Other factors that may also alter the potency of E2 neuroprotection include type of insult, severity of insult, and time of beginning of treatment. In the present study 10 mmol/L glutamate was used as insult. The neuroprotective potency of E2 was 1.9 µmol/L, which is consistent with previous studies.13

Many actions of estrogens are mediated by the binding of the steroid to the nuclear ERs, and the binding of the steroid-receptor complex to the ER response element thereby activates transcriptional events. However, it has become evident that estrogens exert activities in neurons independent of the activation of the classic ERs.27,29,30 Several lines of evidence suggest that the neuroprotective effects of estrogens do not require ER-dependent gene transcription. First, several non–receptor-binding estrogen analogues such as the enantiomer of E2 have been shown to exert neuroprotective efficacy as potent as E2.13,16,18,31 Second, ER antagonists do not attenuate the protective action of E2 in all models of neurotoxicity.21,32 Third, neuroprotection of estrogens can occur in the presence of mRNA or protein synthesis inhibitors.31,33 Furthermore, E2 has been shown to activate a signal transduction pathway involving mitogen-activated protein kinase within minutes of E2 treatment, which is too rapid to involve genomic ER actions.34,35 Taken together, the present study suggests that many of the neuroprotective effects of estrogens are mediated through nongenomic pathways independent of classic ERs.

Vasoactive effects of estrogens in the central nervous system have been suggested. Estrogens can increase CBF during global ischemia and restore postischemic pial microvascular dilation.36,37 Estrogens can increase CBF during early reperfusion in an ischemia/reperfusion model.38 In the present study rapid vascular responses were observed in both E2 and ZYC3 treatment groups. Our study indicated that vasoactive effects of estrogens were not through the classic genomic pathway, which is consistent with previous studies.3941 Because the vascular response of estrogen was determined in the core area of the ischemia, which was not protected by either E2 or ZYC3, the association between neuroprotective properties and vasoactive activity of estrogens cannot be determined in the present study.

Although classic ER-independent neuroprotective effects are suggested by the present study, evidence for ER-dependent action has also been reported. Estrogens have been shown to activate the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway in vitro, which has been proposed to mediate inhibition of apoptosis and support neuronal survival. This activation can be inhibited by ER antagonists.42,43 However, whether this pathway is necessary and sufficient to mediate the neuroprotective effects of estrogens in vivo still remains to be elucidated. It has also been suggested that ER{alpha}, but not ERß, was critical for the neuroprotective properties of estrogen in one ER{alpha} and ERß knockout ({alpha}ERKO, ßERKO) study,44 while another study did not support this conclusion.45 The differences between the ERKO studies could have resulted from the different estrogen concentrations used in the 2 treatment regimens or from the different MCAO models, permanent versus transient, used in these 2 studies. Higher doses of E2 have been demonstrated to exert neuroprotective effects in {alpha}ERKO mice.46 These higher doses of E2 could be the result of the elevated levels of androgen in {alpha}ERKO mice,47 since androgen has been shown to exacerbate ischemia/reperfusion injury.48

In summary, our in vitro and in vivo study suggests that this novel estrogen analogue exerts both neuroprotective and vasoactive effects. The low affinity of binding of ZYC3 to the classic ERs and rapid cerebrovascular action of this estrogen derivative indicate that the neuroprotective and vasoactive effects of estrogens are mediated through nongenomic pathways independent of classic ERs. This non–ER-binding estrogen analogue could be applied in situations in which the feminizing effects of estrogens are undesirable and to avoid other receptor-dependent side effects of estrogens.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AG 10485, Mitokor, and US Army grant DAMD 17-19-1-9473.

Received January 7, 2002; revision received May 17, 2002; accepted May 23, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Thorvaldsen P, Asplund K, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas AM, Schroll M. Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality in the WHO MONICA project: World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease. Stroke. 1995; 26: 361–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Stegmayr B, Asplund K, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas AM, Thorvaldsen P, Tuomilehto J. Stroke incidence and mortality correlated to stroke risk factors in the WHO MONICA Project: an ecological study of 18 populations. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1367–1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Garcia-Segura LM, Azcoitia I, Don Carlos LL. Neuroprotection by estradiol. Prog Neurobiol. 2001; 63: 29–60.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Green PS. Simpkins JW. Neuroprotective effects of estrogens: potential mechanisms of action. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2000; 18: 347–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Yang SH, Shi J, Day AL, Simpkins JW. Estradiol exerts neuroprotective effects when administered after ischemic insult. Stroke. 2000; 31: 745–749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hurn PD, Macrae IM. Estrogen as a neuroprotectant in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 631–652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Toung TJ, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Estrogen-mediated neuroprotection after experimental stroke in male rats. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1666–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Grady D, Wenger NK, Herrington D, Khan S, Furberg C, Hunninghake D, Vittinghoff E, Hulley S. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases risk for venous thromboembolic disease: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 689–696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Risk of myocardial infarction, angina and stroke in users of oral contraceptives: an updated analysis of a cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 890–896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Simon JA, Hsia J, Cauley JA, Richards C, Harris F, Fong J, Barrett-Connor E, Hulley SB. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of stroke: the Heart and Estrogen-progestin Replacement Study (HERS). Circulation. 2001; 103: 638–642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Kernan WN, Sarrel PM, Suissa S, Horwitz RI. A clinical trial of estrogen-replacement therapy after ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1243–1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lunn WH, Farkas E. The adamantyl carbonium ion as a dehydrogenating agent, its reactions with estrone. Tetrahedron. 1968; 24: 6773–6776.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Green PS, Yang SH, Nilsson KR, Kumar AS, Covey DF, Simpkins JW. The nonfeminizing enantiomer of 17beta-estradiol exerts protective effects in neuronal cultures and a rat model of cerebral ischemia. Endocrinology. 2001; 142: 400–406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci. 1998; 76: 1216–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. SAS Institute. SAS STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements for Release 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1996.
  16. Green PS, Bishop J, Simpkins JW. 17 Alpha-estradiol exerts neuroprotective effects on SK-N-SH cells. J Neurosci. 1997; 17: 511–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Simpkins JW, Rajakumar G, Zhang YQ, Simpkins CE, Greenwald D, Yu CJ, Bodor N, Day AL. Estrogens may reduce mortality and ischemic damage caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion in the female rat. J Neurosurg. 1997; 87: 724–730.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Behl C, Skutella T, Lezoualc’h F, Post A, Widmann M, Newton CJ, Holsboer F. Neuroprotection against oxidative stress by estrogens: structure-activity relationship. Mol Pharmacol. 1997; 51: 535–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yang SH, He Z, Wu SS, He YJ, Cutright J, Millard WJ, Day AL, Simpkins JW. 17-Beta estradiol can reduce secondary ischemic damage and mortality of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001; 21: 174–181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Dubal DB, Wise PM. Neuroprotective effects of estradiol in middle-aged female rats. Endocrinology. 2001; 142: 43–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Moosmann B, Behl C. The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 8867–8872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Katzenellenbogen JA. The structural pervasiveness of estrogenic activity. Environ Health Perspect. 1995; 103 (suppl 7): 99–101.
  23. Green PS, Gordon K, Simpkins JW. Phenolic A ring requirement for the neuroprotective effects of steroids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1997; 63: 229–235.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Nikov GN, Eshete M, Rajnarayanan RV, Alworth WL. Interactions of synthetic estrogens with human estrogen receptors. J Endocrinol. 2001; 170: 137–145.[Abstract]
  25. Maher P, Davis JB. The role of monoamine metabolism in oxidative glutamate toxicity. J Neurosci. 1996; 16: 6394–6401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tan S, Wood M, Maher P. Oxidative stress induces a form of programmed cell death with characteristics of both apoptosis and necrosis in neuronal cells. J Neurochem. 1998; 71: 95–105.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Green PS, Gridley KE, Simpkins JW. Nuclear estrogen receptor-independent neuroprotection by estratrienes: a novel interaction with glutathione. Neuroscience. 1998; 84: 7–10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Ghose AK, Crippen GM. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional-structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships, II: modeling dispersive and hydrophobic interactions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1987; 27: 21–35.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Rupprecht R, Holsboer F. Neuroactive steroids: mechanisms of action and neuropsychopharmacological perspectives. Trends Neurosci. 1999; 22: 410–416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Behl C, Manthey D. Neuroprotective activities of estrogen: an update. J Neurocytol. 2000; 29: 351–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Sawada H, Ibi M, Kihara T, Urushitani M, Akaike A, Shimohama S. Estradiol protects mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons from oxidative stress-induced neuronal death. J Neurosci Res. 1998; 54: 707–719.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Weaver CE Jr, Park-Chung M, Gibbs TT, Farb DH. 17Beta-estradiol protects against NMDA-induced excitotoxicity by direct inhibition of NMDA receptors. Brain Res. 1997; 761: 338–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Regan RF, Guo Y. Estrogens attenuate neuronal injury due to hemoglobin, chemical hypoxia, and excitatory amino acids in murine cortical cultures. Brain Res. 1997; 764: 133–140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Singh M, Setalo G Jr, Guan X, Warren M, Toran-Allerand CD. Estrogen-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in cerebral cortical explants: convergence of estrogen and neurotrophin signaling pathways. J Neurosci. 1999; 19: 1179–1188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Manthey D, Heck S, Engert S, Behl C. Estrogen induces a rapid secretion of amyloid beta precursor protein via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 4285–4291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Hurn PD, Littleton-Kearney MT, Kirsch JR, Dharmarajan AM, Traystman RJ. Postischemic cerebral blood flow recovery in the female: effect of 17 beta-estradiol. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1995; 15: 666–672.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Watanabe Y, Littleton-Kearney MT, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Estrogen restores postischemic pial microvascular dilation. Am J Physiol. 2001; 281: H155–H160.
  38. McCullough LD, Alkayed NJ, Traystman RJ, Williams MJ, Hurn PD. Postischemic estrogen reduces hypoperfusion and secondary ischemia after experimental stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32: 796–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Landers JP, Spelsberg TC. New concepts in steroid hormone action: transcription factors, proto-oncogenes, and the cascade model for steroid regulation of gene expression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1992; 2: 19–63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME. Rapid vasomotor effects of estrogen: men are part of the club. Chest. 1998; 114: 1508–1509.[Free Full Text]
  41. Dubey RK, Jackson EK, Keller PJ, Imthurn B, Rosselli M. Estradiol metabolites inhibit endothelin synthesis by an estrogen receptor-independent mechanism. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 640–644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Honda K, Sawada H, Kihara T, Urushitani M, Nakamizo T, Akaike A, Shimohama S. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mediates neuroprotection by estrogen in cultured cortical neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000; 60: 321–327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Zhang L, Rubinow DR, Xaing G, Li BS, Chang YH, Maric D, Barker JL, Ma W. Estrogen protects against beta-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in rat hippocampal neurons by activation of Akt. Neuroreport. 2001; 12: 1919–1923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Dubal DB, Zhu H, Yu J, Rau SW, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, Kindy MS, Wise PM. Estrogen receptor alpha, not beta, is a critical link in estradiol-mediated protection against brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 1952–1957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Sampei K, Goto S, Alkayed NJ, Crain BJ, Korach KS, Traystman RJ, Demas GE, Nelson RJ, Hurn PD. Stroke in estrogen receptor-{alpha}–deficient mice. Stroke. 2000; 31: 738–743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. McCullough DL, Sugo N, Alkayed NJ, Blizzard KK, Korach K, Hurn PD. Estrogen protects ischemic brain of ER{alpha} and ERß-knockout mice. Physiologist. 2001; 44: 269.Abstract.
  47. Couse JF, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev. 1999; 20: 358–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Yang SH, Perez E, Cutright J, Liu R, He Z, Day AL, Simpkins JW. Testosterone increases neurotoxicity of glutamate in vitro and ischemia-reperfusion injury in an animal model. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 195–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. D. Yi, Z. Y. Cai, D. F. Covey, and J. W. Simpkins
Estrogen Receptor-Independent Neuroprotection via Protein Phosphatase Preservation and Attenuation of Persistent Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1188 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. E. Jung, A. M. Wilson, and J. W. Simpkins
A Nonfeminizing Estrogen Analog Protects against Ethanol Withdrawal Toxicity in Immortalized Hippocampal Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 543 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. D. Bushnell, P. Hurn, C. Colton, V. M. Miller, G. del Zoppo, M. S.V. Elkind, B. Stern, D. Herrington, G. Ford-Lynch, P. Gorelick, et al.
Advancing the Study of Stroke in Women: Summary and Recommendations for Future Research From an NINDS-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Working Group
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2387 - 2399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
X. Wang, J. A. Dykens, E. Perez, R. Liu, S. Yang, D. F. Covey, and J. W. Simpkins
Neuroprotective Effects of 17beta-Estradiol and Nonfeminizing Estrogens against H2O2 Toxicity in Human Neuroblastoma SK-N-SH Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 395 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
J. W. SIMPKINS, Y. WEN, E. PEREZ, S. YANG, and X. WANG
Role of Nonfeminizing Estrogens in Brain Protection from Cerebral Ischemia: An Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease Neuropathology
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2005; 1052(1): 233 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. E. Jung, M. B. Gatch, and J. W. Simpkins
Estrogen Neuroprotection Against the Neurotoxic Effects of Ethanol Withdrawal: Potential Mechanisms
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2005; 230(1): 8 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. W. Simpkins, S.-H. Yang, R. Liu, E. Perez, Z. Y. Cai, D. F. Covey, and P. S. Green
Estrogen-Like Compounds for Ischemic Neuroprotection
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11_suppl_1): 2648 - 2651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
S.-H. YANG, R. LIU, S. S. WU, and J. W. SIMPKINS
The Use of Estrogens and Related Compounds in the Treatment of Damage from Cerebral Ischemia
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2003; 1007(1): 101 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. S. Watson and B. Gametchu
Proteins of Multiple Classes May Participate in Nongenomic Steroid Actions
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2003; 228(11): 1272 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Prokai, K. Prokai-Tatrai, P. Perjesi, A. D. Zharikova, E. J. Perez, R. Liu, and J. W. Simpkins
Quinol-based cyclic antioxidant mechanism in estrogen neuroprotection
PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11741 - 11746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroprotectors
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction