This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cupini, L.M. Articles by Bernardi, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cupini, L.M. Articles by Bernardi, G. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Acute Stroke Syndromes Cerebral Lacunes Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Risk Factors for Stroke

(Stroke. 2002;33:689.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Lacunar Versus Nonlacunar Infarcts

L.M. Cupini, MD; P. Pasqualetti, PhD; M. Diomedi, MD; F. Vernieri, MD; M. Silvestrini, MD; B. Rizzato, MD; F. Ferrante, MD G. Bernardi, MD

From Clinica Neurologica, Ospedale S.Eugenio, Universita’ di Roma Tor Vergata (L.M.C., M.D., M.S., B.R., F.F., G.B.); AFaR, Dipartimento di Neurologia, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina (P.P., F.V.); and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico "S. Lucia" (P.P., G.B.), Rome, Italy.

Correspondence to Dr L.M. Cupini, Clinica Neurologica, Universitá di Roma "Tor Vergata," Ospedale S. Eugenio, P. le Umanesimo 10, 00144 Roma, Italy. E-mail lecupini{at}tin.it

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background and Purpose— Increases in the thickness of the intima and media of the carotid artery have been associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in subjects without a history of cardiovascular disease. Lacunar infarcts, one of the most common subtype of ischemic stroke, show unique pathological and clinicoradiological characteristics. The present study examines the relationship between vascular risk factors, including carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), and lacunar versus nonlacunar infarcts.

Methods— We collected data from patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to hospital. Patients and 129 control subjects underwent B-mode ultrasonographic measurements of IMT of the common carotid artery. We examined the association of lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts with age, sex, and potential vascular risk factors.

Results— Of 292 adult patients with an acute first-ever ischemic stroke, 96 were considered lacunar and 196 were considered nonlacunar strokes. We did not find a significantly different percentage of diabetes, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and previous transient ischemic attack between the 2 groups of patients. The multinomial logistic regression procedure selected carotid artery IMT and atrial fibrillation as the only independent factors able to discriminate between lacunar and nonlacunar patients. IMT values were significantly higher in patients with nonlacunar stroke versus both those with lacunar stroke and control subjects.

Conclusions— The present results indicate the usefulness of noninvasive measurement of IMT with ultrasonic techniques as a diagnostic tool that may help to identify different subtypes of ischemic stroke patients. The noninvasive measurements may have predictive power with respect to lacunar versus nonlacunar infarcts.

Key Words: lacunar infarction • risk factors • ultrasonography

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
High-resolution B-mode ultrasonography provides a noninvasive method of quantifying subclinical arterial wall thickening and atherosclerotic progression. This technique permits us to obtain measures of intima-media thickness (IMT), an increase in which is generally considered an early marker of atherosclerosis. Measurement of carotid artery IMT is regarded as a valid index of the involvement of other arterial beds with atherosclerosis.^1,2 In addition, carotid artery IMT has been found to be strongly associated with cardiovascular risk factors.^3–5 Several studies have shown an association between carotid artery IMT and incidence of myocardial infarction^6–10 and stroke.^7,10,11

Measurements at different sites of the carotid artery have been performed by different groups.^7,10,12,13 It has been shown that common carotid artery (CCA) IMT is a good predictor of stroke incidence, whereas internal carotid artery (ICA) IMT measurement has a greater power of prediction for myocardial infarction.¹⁰ Similarly, CCA IMT has been shown to be strongly associated with risk factors for stroke and prevalent stroke, whereas IMT bifurcation and plaque were more directly related to ischemic heart disease and its risk factors.¹²

There is no standardized method to measure IMT by ultrasound. Because it has been suggested that measurement of IMT at the CCA alone is a reasonable alternative to more detailed and theoretically difficult measurements at other sites¹⁴ and because of the relatively common occurrence of plaques at the origin of the ICA, we confined measurements of IMT to the CCA. Some studies obtained measures at the near and far walls,^1,3,5 whereas others obtained them at the far wall only.^2,7,12 Because far-wall measurements are considered more valid than near-wall measurements,¹⁵ we focused on far-wall IMT.

Lacunar infarction, one of the most common causes of ischemic stroke, is presumed to result from the occlusion of single perforating arteries. Small-artery disease (from lipohyalinosis and fibrinoid degeneration),^16–20 large-artery atherosclerosis,^21–23 and embolism^24–28 have been implicated as potential causes of lacunar infarcts. However, some authors consider cardiac and carotid embolism unlikely causes of lacunar infarction.^17,29,30 Recently, a relationship has been observed between milder ICA stenosis and lacunar infarcts.^31,32 This finding confirmed a similar previous observation.³³

In studies that classified lacunar infarcts, clinical presentation (lacunar syndrome), history of diabetes and hypertension, previous lacunes on baseline early CT, and the absence of cardiac sources of embolism and of ipsilateral carotid stenosis >50% have been investigated as predicting variables of lacunar infarcts. However, a satisfying predictive model for lacunar infarctions in an acute setting is still lacking.³⁴ The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship between vascular risk factors, including CCA IMT, and lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts. The aim of our study was to determine the value of CCA IMT measurement in predicting lacunar infarcts in respect to other infarct subtypes.

	Subjects and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We prospectively collected data from 420 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to our neurology ward from January 1998 to September 2000 and from control subjects recruited during the same period. A stroke was defined as rapidly developing signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function lasting >24 hours with no apparent cause other than vascular. Exclusion criteria were age <45 years, isolated transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and history of previous stroke. Neurological status was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. All patients underwent a CT scan on admission as part of standard stroke patient care. MRI (or CT when MRI was unperformable because of the presence of a metal implant or if the patient refused or was claustrophobic) was performed within 1 week from the onset of symptoms. Axial T1-,T2-, and proton density-weighted images were obtained with a 1.5-T MRI (Gyroscan ACS, NT Philips Medical Systems). Images were evaluated at a central reading center by neuroradiologists. To check the reliability of the radiological definition, 2 observers (1 neuroradiologist and 1 neurologist who were unaware of patients’ vascular risk factors) reexamined the images for this study. The carotid arteries were evaluated with a high-resolution ultrasound (AU5 Harmonic, Esaote Biomedica) equipped with a linear transducer with 7.5 MHz in B mode. The carotid arteries were evaluated for the presence of atherosclerotic lesions (plaques), defined as focal widening relative to adjacent segments, with protrusion into the lumen of only calcified deposits or a combination of calcification and noncalcified material. This measurement was performed for the left and right CCAs, bifurcation, and ICAs. Carotid artery disease was assessed and defined by continuous-wave Doppler and color-flow B-mode Doppler ultrasound examination according to validated criteria.³⁵ Twelve patients underwent conventional angiography, and 45 patients underwent MR angiography to optimize treatment and to exclude severe intracranial atherosclerotic disease. The results of Duplex ultrasound examination and MR angiography were always concordant.

Patients and 129 control subjects underwent B-mode ultrasonographic measurements of CCA IMT. Control subjects were recruited among individuals who consecutively underwent ultrasound examination at the same institution for any reason other than cerebrovascular disease. Subjects complaining of symptoms like tension-type headache, dizziness, and hypoacusia and who were subsequently shown to be disease free were entered in the present study.

The subjects were examined in the supine position with the head turned 45° to the left or right. Longitudinal images of the left and right CCAs were acquired. The near and far walls of the carotid artery were displayed as 2 bright white lines separated by a hypoechogenic space. Two frozen images of IMT from the far wall on both the right and left CCAs were acquired. IMT of the far wall was defined as the distance between the leading edge of the lumen-intima interface and the leading edge of the media-adventitia interface. The measurement of IMT in the CCA was made 1 cm proximal to the carotid bulb. The number of measurements ranged from 3 to 5 for each frozen image. The actual measurement of the IMT was performed offline and was calculated as the average of the maximal IMT measured at the far wall of each CCA. Subjects were examined by the same 2 sonographers. Both sonographers were neurologists with experience in ultrasound examination of the carotid artery. The study began after a 3-month training program in IMT measurements. The reproducibility of IMT measurements between and within sonographers had previously been checked.

The sonographers were unaware of clinical and radiological information about the participants. Information on demographic characteristics, previous diseases, habits, and cardiovascular risk factors was collected from both patients and control subjects with a structured medical history.

Traditional risk factors for cerebrovascular disease were evaluated. Height and weight were measured. Age, sex, diabetes, history of smoking (current smokers), heavy alcohol consumption (300 g/wk), history of hypertension (previously diagnosed and treated or systolic pressure >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure >90 mm Hg persistently observed during admission and after the acute phase), low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, presence or absence of atrial fibrillation (AF; history of AF confirmed by previous ECG examination or AF diagnosed at the time of admission and/or during the hospital stay), cardiovascular diseases, carotid stenosis (50%), and history of previous TIA were recorded.

According to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria,³⁶ ischemic strokes were classified into the following categories: infarction resulting from extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis, embolism from a commonly accepted cardiac source, lacunar infarction, infarction of other determined origin, and infarction of undetermined origin. Brain imaging was classified as lacunar or nonlacunar infarcts (border-zone, cortical, or large subcortical infarcts). Lacunar infarcts were defined by a combination of symptoms or signs and radiological criteria. Patients with a clinical presentation consistent with 1 of the 5 classic lacunar syndromes (primary motor, primary sensory, or sensory motor symptoms; the dysarthria clumsy hand syndrome; or the ataxia-hemiparesis syndrome) were included.¹⁸ Rarer lacunar syndromes, such as subthalamic infarction causing hemiballismus, were included only if there was MRI documentation of the site and size of infarct. In all cases, MRI excluded causes other than cerebral infarction. To be defined as a lacunar lesion by MRI, the following criteria had to be met: (1) be round or oval in shape; (2) measure 1.5 cm in diameter; (3) be located in the typical territory supplied by deep or superficial small perforating arteries; (4) not be in cortical territories; and (5) not have the morphological and topographical distribution consistent with partial internal border-zone infarcts. Patients with a clinical presentation consistent with a lacunar syndrome and neuroimaging confirmation of 1 lacunar lesions located in the appropriate area of the brain to explain the symptoms were classified as having lacunar infarcts.

Patients were subdivided into 2 groups, lacunar and nonlacunar infarctions, for further statistical analysis. The association of the IMT with lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts was examined before and after control for the potential risk factors.

Statistical Analysis
The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the discriminating role of the CCA IMT among patients with lacunar infarcts and nonlacunar infarcts and control subjects, taking into account eventual differences in terms of demographic characteristics and presence of cerebrovascular risk factors. For such a purpose, the multinomial logistic regression, able to handle >2 outcomes, was applied. To better understand the effect of each variable alone, several multinomial simple logistic regressions were performed first. Thereafter, the multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis allowed us to determine which variables could be considered independent factors. To perform only independent contrasts (always k-1, where k is the number of considered groups) and because we wanted to focus on discriminating lacunar infarcts from nonlacunar infarcts and from control subjects, the relative risk ratios (RRRs) and 95% confidence intervals were computed with the lacunar infarct group as reference. Finally, a binary logistic regression was applied to the 2 groups of patients to obtain the model-predicted probabilities and to evaluate the eventual interaction between the significant discriminating factors. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 10.0 (SPSS Inc).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Among 420 adult patients consecutively recruited during the study period, 42 subjects were excluded because they had had 1 previous stroke, 29 because they were <45 years of age, and 57 because they were diagnosed as having had isolated TIAs. Therefore, the studied population consisted of 292 adult, first-ever ischemic stroke patients 45 to 90 years of age (mean, 69.7±10.7 years) and 129 control subjects.

Among the patients who entered the present study, 96 were considered to have had lacunar and 196 to have had nonlacunar strokes. The 5 classic lacunar syndromes accounted for 96.9% of the lacunar infarctions; other lacunar syndromes accounted for only 3.1%. Among the cases of nonlacunar infarcts, atherosclerotic stroke accounted for 24% of cases, cardiac embolism for 28%, undetermined origin for 45%, and stroke of other determined origin for 3%. The average of left and right IMTs was considered for statistical analysis as a parameter of atherosclerosis.¹⁰

The Table summarizes the descriptive statistics of the 3 groups, as well as the simple and multiple regression findings for the demographic and vascular risk factor characteristics. The overall tests indicated that age, IMT, dyslipidemia, hypertension, AF, myocardial infarction, previous TIA, and carotid stenosis were able to discriminate between the 3 groups.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Group Statistics and Multiple Regression Results for Demographic and Vascular Risk Factors

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1A. (Continued)

When all variables were considered together in a multiple regression model, slight changes occurred. Age, able to discriminate only patients with nonlacunar stroke from control subjects in the simple analysis, was no more significant. The presence of dyslipidemia or hypertension reduced by 50% the probability of being a control subject compared with having lacunar stroke. The RRRs for AF and previous TIA were not computable because of the absence of such risk factors in the control group. The nonlacunar infarct group results differed from those of the lacunar infarct group for IMT and AF. More precisely, the probability of being nonlacunar versus lacunar increased by 26% for each increment of 0.1 mm and of 7.5-fold in the presence of AF.

The binary logistic regression applied to the 2 groups of patients allowed us to obtain the graphical representation reported in the Figure, in which the estimated risk of nonlacunar ischemic events is plotted against IMT and history of AF. In particular, the interaction term AFxIMT was added in the model to verify the parallelism (null hypothesis) of the 2 lines with significant results (change in -2 log likelihood=18.6; df=1; P<0.001), indicating a different role of IMT in the 2 groups with and without AF. Because the control group was excluded from this latter analysis, it should be noted that as a prediction tool, the predicted probabilities will apply only to those patients who have either a lacunar or nonlacunar stroke somewhere in their future.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Probabilities of nonlacunar vs lacunar stroke as predicted by the logistic regression model. Both significant factors are represented: IMT (on the x axis) and AF ( when absent and • when present). According to this model, a patient with an IMT value of 0.6 mm has a risk of 40% to have a nonlacunar vs lacunar stroke, but the risk increases to 80% in the presence of a concomitant AF. Without AF, the same 80% level could be reached by a patient with an IMT >1.2 mm. The 2 modeled lines also indicate the smaller effect of AF in patients with an IMT value >1.5 mm and the less relevant role of IMT in the presence of AF. The significance of the interaction term AFxIMT confirmed this observation.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the present study, we observed that CCA IMT and AF are the only 2 independent factors able to discriminate between lacunar and nonlacunar ischemic strokes. Lacunar infarcts, one of the most common subtypes of ischemic stroke, show unique clinical, pathophysiological, and radiological characteristics. When a stroke occurs, the ultimate outcome differs with the subtype of stroke and is influenced by patient comorbidities. Patients with lacunar stroke have the best short- and long-term prognoses and the highest survival rate.³⁷ In addition, lacunar patients have the lowest risk for early and late recurrence.³⁷

Lacunes are considered to account for between 12% and 30% of all cases of ischemic stroke.³⁸ The higher proportion of patients with lacunar infarct in our population (33%) could be due to selection factors inherent in the referral of patients to our neurological department. In fact, stroke patients who present large hemispheric strokes and thus require an intensive care unit are admitted to a special department; for this reason, they could not have been entered in the present study. Moreover, because we excluded stroke patients <45 years of age, a group of mostly nonlacunar strokes did not enter the present study.³⁹

According to the lacunar hypothesis, small-vessel disease (from lipohyalinosis and fibrinoid degeneration)^16–20 is the most important cause of lacunar infarction, whereas atherosclerosis and embolism are less important. Nevertheless, both cardiac embolism^24–26,28and large-artery atherosclerosis^{21,22,27,31,32} have been increasingly recognized and described as potential causes of lacunar stroke.

Increases in CCA IMT thickness have been associated with involvement of other arterial beds with atherosclerosis^1,2 and an increased risk of stroke in adults.^7,10 However, there is only a little knowledge concerning the relationship between CCA IMT and subtypes of brain infarction. Recently, it has been observed that an increased CCA IMT was associated with brain infarctions both overall and in the main subtypes.⁴⁰ Authors have concluded that an increased IMT may help in the selection of patients at high risk for brain infarction.⁴⁰ In our study, lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts differed in terms of CCA IMT. In addition, we did not find a significant difference in IMT between control subjects and patients with lacunar infarcts, whereas Touboul et al⁴⁰observed a slight but significantly higher IMT even in lacunar infarcts compared with control subjects. Different criteria in the selection of patients could account for these different results. In fact, because an increase in IMT has been described as an independent risk factor for stroke in older subjects,¹⁰ we excluded stroke patients <45 years of age. In addition, we included only first-ever stroke patients. For these reasons, we believe that our data provide a different perspective on the capability of CCA IMT to discriminate lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts.

There is a long-standing debate as to whether lacunar infarcts have a different risk profile compared with other forms of ischemic stroke.^30,41–44 Case-control studies reported an association between diabetes, hypertension, smoking habit, and lacunar infarcts.^27,41,43 On the other hand, studies comparing lacunar and nonlacunar stroke patients failed to find important differences in diabetes and hypertension^30,37,42,45 and in smoking,^30,38 previous TIA,^30,38 and hypercholesterolemia between the 2 groups of patients.³⁸ Similarly, a recent population-based study reported that hypertension and diabetes are not more common among patients with lacunar infarcts.⁴⁴ We observed that the 2 groups did not differ significantly in prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and previous TIA.

The significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of presence of AF confirms previous findings, ^17,29,30 and our data support the hypothesis that AF may represent a coincidental finding in lacunar infarct. In our population, although quite similar percentages of carotid stenosis were found, a strong, significant probability value documented an increased IMT in the nonlacunar compared with the lacunar group. The finding that the 2 groups of patients significantly differed in terms of increased CCA IMT suggests that IMT does not reflect vascular changes that are etiologically related to lacunar disease.

After adjustment for conventional risk factors, increases in CCA IMT and AF were the variables most strongly associated with the risk of nonlacunar infarcts. This finding indicates that noninvasive measurements of IMT with ultrasonic techniques may help to identify different subtypes of ischemic stroke patients (see the logistic regression model in the Figure). Our study suggests that using a model of investigation that includes analysis of clinical syndromes, results of diagnostic imaging, and analysis of the most common stroke risk factors, including CCA IMT measurement, allows us to reliably predict the occurrence of lacunar infarcts compared with other infarct subtypes.

In conclusion, IMT measurements may add data to the predictive power, represented by a constellation of findings, with respect to lacunar versus nonlacunar infarcts.

	Footnotes

 
Dr Silvestrini currently is at the Clinica Neurologica, Universita’ di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.

Received July 5, 2001; revision received November 14, 2001; accepted November 22, 2001.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Burke GL, Evans GW, Riley WA, Sharrett AR, Howard G, Barnes RW, Rosamond W, Crow RS, Rautaharju PM, Heiss G. Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 1995; 26: 386–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Allan PL, Mowbray PI, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease: The Edinburgh Artery Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 348–353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Kittner SJ, Bond MG, Wolfson SK Jr, Bommer W, Price TR, Gardin JM, Savage PJ. Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study: the CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke. 1992; 23: 1752–1760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Poli A, Tremoli E, Colombo A, Sirtoti M, Pignoli P, Paoletti R. Ultrasonographic measurement of the common carotid artery wall thickness in hypercholesterolemic patients: a new model for the quantification and follow-up of preclinical atherosclerosis in living human subjects. Atherosclerosis. 1988; 70: 253–261.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Salonen R, Salonen JT. Determinants of carotid intima-media thickness: a population-based ultrasonography study in eastern Finnish men. J Intern Med. 1991; 229: 225–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991; 11: 1245–1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1432–1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, Clegg LX. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146: 483–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Selzer RH, Liu CR, Liu CH, Azen SP. The role of carotid artery intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128: 262–269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. O’ Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK. Carotid-artery intima media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 14–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Clegg LX, Sharrett AR, Shahar E, Nieto FJ, Rosamond WD, Evans G. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 1: 151: 478–487.

12. Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999; 30: 841–850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Stensland-Bugge E, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O. Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness: the Tromso Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1972–1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Crouse JRIII, Craven TE, Hagman AP, Bond MG. Association of coronary disease with segment-specific intima-medial thickening of the extracranial carotid artery Circulation. 1995; 92: 1141–1147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Wendelhag I, Gustavsson T, Suurkula M, Berglund G, Wikstrand J. Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: fundamental principles and description of a computerized analyzing system. Clin Physiol. 1991; 11: 565–577.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Fisher CM. The arterial lesions underlying lacunes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1969; 12: 1–15.

17. Boiten J, Lodder J. Lacunar infarcts: pathogenesis and validity of the clinical syndromes. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1374–1378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Fisher CM. Lacunar strokes and infarcts: a review. Neurology. 1982; 32: 871–876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Mohr JP. Lacunes. Stroke. 1982; 13: 3–11.[Free Full Text]

20. Bamford JM, Warlow CP. Evolution and testing of the lacunar hypothesis. Stroke. 1988; 19: 1074–1082.[Free Full Text]

21. Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J, Ramos LM, Keunen JE. Carotid angiography in patients with lacunar infarction: a prospective study. Stroke. 1988; 19: 1093–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Ghika J, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Infarcts in the territory of the deep perforator from the carotid system. Neurology. 1989; 39: 507–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Tegeler CH, Shi F, Morgan T. Carotid stenosis in lacunar stroke. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1124–1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Santamaria J, Graus F, Rubio F, Arbizu T, Peres J. Cerebral infarction of the basal ganglia due to embolism from the heart. Stroke. 1983; 14: 911–914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Gorsselink EL, Peeters HP, Lodder J. Causes of small deep infarcts detected by CT. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1984; 86: 271–273.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Ay H, Oliveira-Filho J, Buonanno FS, Ezzedinem M, Schaefer PW, Rordorf G, Schwamm LH, Gonzalez RG, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion-weighted imaging identifies a subset of lacunar infarction associated with embolic source. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2644–2650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Kazui S, Levi CR, Jones EF, Quang L, Calafiore P, Donnan GA. Risk factors for lacunar stroke: a case-control transesophageal echocardiographic study. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1385–1387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Horowitz DR, Tuhrim S, Weinberger JM, Rudolph SH. Mechanisms in lacunar infarction. Stroke. 1992; 23: 325–327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Sacco SE, Whisnant JP, Broderick JP, Phillips SJ, O’Fallon WM. Epidemiological characteristics of lacunar infarcts in a population. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1236–1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Lodder J, Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Jones LN, Warlow CP. Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? Stroke. 1990; 21: 375–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Sharpe BL, Fox AJ, Barnett HJM. Risk factors and outcome of patients with carotid artery stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke. Neurology. 2000; 54: 660–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, Sharpe BL, Chan RKT, Meldrum HE, Barnett HJM. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1693–1700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Boiten J. Ischemic lacunar stroke in the European Carotid Surgery Trial: risk factors, distribution of carotid stenosis effect of surgery and type of recurrent stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996; 6: 281–287.

34. Toni D, Iweins F, von Kummer R, Busse O, Bogousslavsky J, Falcou A, Lesaffre E, Lenzi GL. Identification of lacunar infarcts before thrombolysis in the ECASS 1 Study. Neurology. 2000; 54: 684–688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. De Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantification of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995; 5: 414–426.[CrossRef]

36. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EEIII, for the TOAST Investigators. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Sacco RL, Wolf PA, Gorelick PB. Risk factors and their management for stroke prevention: outlook for 1999 and beyond. Neurology. 1999; 53 (suppl 4): S15–S24.

38. Gan R, Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Roberts JK, Boden-Albala B, Gu Q. Testing the validity of the lacunar hypothesis: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study experience. Neurology. 1997; 48: 1204–1211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Williams LS, Garg BP, Cohen M, Fleck JD, Biller J. Subtypes of ischemic stroke in children and young adults. Neurology. 1997; 49: 1541–1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Touboul PJ, Elbaz A, Koller C, Lucas C, Adrai V, Chedru F, Amarenco P. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness and brain infarction: the Etude du Profil Genetique de l’Infarctus Cerebral (GENIC) case-control study: the GENIC Investigators. Circulation. 2000; 102: 313–318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. You R, McNeil JJ, O’Malley HM, Davis SM, Donnan GA. Risk factors for lacunar infarction syndromes. Neurology. 1995; 45: 1483–1487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Boiten J, Luijckx GJ, Kessels F, Lodder J. Risk factors for lacunes. Neurology. 1996; 47: 1109–1110.[Free Full Text]

43. Chamorro A, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Kase CS, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, Price TR, Hier DB. Clinical-computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1991; 22: 175–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2513–2516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Mast H, Thompson JPL, Lee S-H, Mohr JP, Sacco RL. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus as determinants of multiple lacunar infarcts. Stroke. 1995; 26: 30–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rodes-Cabau, M. Noel, A. Marrero, D. Rivest, A. Mackey, C. Houde, E. Bedard, E. Larose, S. Verreault, M. Peticlerc, et al. Atherosclerotic Burden Findings in Young Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With and Without a Patent Foramen Ovale Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.J. Lee, H.J. Kim, J.M. Bae, J.C. Kim, H.J. Han, C.S. Park, N.H. Park, M.S. Kim, and J.A. Ryu Relevance of Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Carotid Plaque as Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 916 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. O. Pruissen, S. A.M. Gerritsen, T. J. Prinsen, J. M. Dijk, L. J. Kappelle, A. Algra, and on behalf of the SMART Study Group Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Different in Large- and Small-Vessel Ischemic Stroke: The SMART Study Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1371 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Dijk, Y. van der Graaf, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, A. Algra, and on behalf of the SMART study group Carotid intima-media thickness and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest atherosclerotic disease: the SMART study Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1971 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Jackson and C. Sudlow Are Lacunar Strokes Really Different?: A Systematic Review of Differences in Risk Factor Profiles Between Lacunar and Nonlacunar Infarcts Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 891 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Diomedi, A. Pietroiusti, M. Silvestrini, B. Rizzato, L. M. Cupini, F. Ferrante, A. Magrini, A. Bergamaschi, A. Galante, and G. Bernardi CagA-positive Helicobacter pylori strains may influence the natural history of atherosclerotic stroke Neurology, September 14, 2004; 63(5): 800 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Bleil, J. M. McCaffery, M. F. Muldoon, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, and S. B. Manuck Anger-Related Personality Traits and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis in Untreated Hypertensive Men Psychosom Med, September 1, 2004; 66(5): 633 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nagata, E. Sasaki, K. Goda, N. Yamamoto, M. Sugino, T. Hanafusa, K. Yamamoto, I. Narabayashi, L. M. Cupini, and F. Vernieri Cerebrovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Without Hypertension * Response Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34 (12): e232 - e233. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. R. Hernandez, A. A. Kroon, M. P.J. van Boxtel, W. H. Mess, J. Lodder, J. Jolles, and P. W. de Leeuw Is There a Side Predilection for Cerebrovascular Disease? Hypertension, July 1, 2003; 42(1): 56 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Devuyst and J. Bogousslavsky Editorial Comment: The Fall and Rise of Lacunar Infarction With Carotid Stenosis Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1409 - 1411. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cupini, L.M. Articles by Bernardi, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cupini, L.M. Articles by Bernardi, G. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Acute Stroke Syndromes Cerebral Lacunes Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Risk Factors for Stroke