doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000016402.42083.9D
(Stroke. 2002;33:1530.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Second Harmonic Imaging of the Human Brain
The Practicability of Coronal Insonation Planes and Alternative Perfusion Parameters
From the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr J. Harrer, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. E-mail Judith.Harrer{at}post.rwth-aachen.de
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Second harmonic imaging (SHI) is a novel ultrasound technique that allows the evaluation of brain tissue perfusion. The purpose of this study was to assess normal cerebral echo contrast characteristics in 3 regions of interest (ROIs) in the transverse axial and coronal insonation planes through the temporal bone window.
Materials and Methods— SHI examinations were performed in 25 patients without cerebrovascular disease (aged 50±19 years) in a transverse axial and a coronal diencephalic insonation plane through the temporal bone window. After intravenous administration of 2.5 g (400 mg/mL) of a galactose-based echo contrast agent, 62 time-triggered images with a transmission rate of 1 frame per 2.5 seconds were recorded for offline analysis. Time-intensity curves, including peak intensity (PI) (dB) and positive gradient (PG) (dB/s), were calculated to quantify ultrasound intensity in 3 different ROIs in both planes of the following sections: the thalamus (ROIthal), the lentiform nucleus (ROIncl), and the area supplied by the middle cerebral artery (ROImca).
Results— Characteristic time-intensity curves with high PIs and steep PGs were recorded in each ROI. Statistical analysis of the aforementioned parameters showed no significant difference for comparison of the 3 ROIs in the transverse axial versus the coronal insonation plane. Comparison of different ROIs in the transverse axial insonation plane revealed that PI was significantly higher in ROIthal than in ROImca (7.8 versus 5.5 dB; P<0.05) and significantly higher in ROIncl than in ROIthal (9.3 versus 7.8 dB; P<0.05). In contrast, PG was comparable in ROIthal and in ROImca (0.21 versus 0.25 dB/s; P=0.42).
Conclusions— SHI is a promising technique for the evaluation of cerebral parenchymal perfusion. Comparison of the transverse axial and coronal insonation planes shows similar time-intensity curves with comparable values for PIs and PGs. Coronal insonation allows the evaluation of perfusion abnormalities near the vertex and skull base, areas that cannot be depicted in the transverse axial plane. Comparison of the different ROIs indicates that the PG is a more robust and reliable parameter than the PI.
Key Words: brain • contrast media • image interpretation • perfusion • ultrasonography
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Until recently, perfusion imaging of the brain has been an unapproachable diagnostic field for transcranial ultrasound. Validated methods for perfusion studies of the brain are perfusion MRI, positron emission tomography, and 99mTc–hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime and 99mTc–ethylcysteinate dimer single-photon emission CT.1–10 The disadvantages of these techniques are that they either require the application of radioactive substances, are stressful or even intolerable for the critically ill patient, and are time-consuming and expensive. Therefore a noninvasive, bedside, nonstressful, easily applied, and frequently repeatable method to assess brain perfusion is needed.
Second harmonic imaging (SHI) is a novel ultrasound technique that enables visualization and measurement of tissue perfusion. SHI is based on the nonlinear properties of ultrasound contrast agents.11 While insonated tissue responds primarily at the transmitted or so-called fundamental frequency, the microbubbles of the contrast agents respond at the fundamental frequency and multiples of this frequency, the so-called harmonic frequencies. SHI is named after the first of these multiples because this is usually the strongest. By the use of a filter, the SHI system insonates at 1 frequency, the fundamental frequency, and receives only at twice that frequency, the second harmonic frequency. Thus, the unwanted fundamental frequency is removed, and the signal-to-clutter ratio is dramatically increased.12–15 As a result, microbubbles in the capillary bed can be distinguished from the avascular tissue, and capillary blood flow becomes visible and measurable by the calculation of time-intensity curves in user-specified regions of interest (ROIs).
Previous studies of myocardial, hepatic, and renal perfusion with the use of SHI have shown the high potential of this technique to reliably evaluate normal and abnormal perfusion.16–22 SHI can be used as an additional diagnostic tool for the differential diagnosis of perfusion disturbances, such as in acute myocardial infarction, or of space-occupying lesions of the liver.23–25
Neurosonological SHI studies by Federlein, Postert, and Seidel et al26–32 have already shown the ability of SHI to evaluate human brain perfusion in healthy volunteers as well as in acute ischemic stroke.
The purpose of our study was to assess human brain perfusion with the use of SHI in patients without cerebrovascular diseases. In comparison to previous studies, 2 insonation planes, the transverse axial and the coronal planes, were investigated. This approach was adopted because certain parts of the brain, such as the temporoparietal region and regions near the skull, can only be visualized by the coronal insonation plane and moreover because these 2 planes are both regularly used in other imaging techniques. Furthermore, we evaluated a supplementary, user-defined ROI, the middle cerebral artery territory, because this area is the most frequently affected in stroke. Finally, we analyzed an additional parameter of the time-intensity curve, the positive gradient (PG), which is the peak intensity (PI) divided by the time to peak intensity (TP), because the PI is known from previous studies to be highly variable intraindividually and interindividually and therefore is an unreliable parameter for the evaluation of brain tissue perfusion.26,29
|
Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patients
The study included 25 patients (mean age, 50 years; range, 26 to 79 years; 17 men, 8 women). For inclusion, patients needed to have an adequate acoustic bone window enabling the depiction of the brain stem and third ventricle in ordinary B-mode imaging. Exclusion criteria were as follows: cerebrovascular disease (excluded by extracranial and transcranial Doppler studies); uncontrolled hypertension (repetitive systolic blood pressure of >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of >85 mm Hg during admission or previously known); severe heart failure (New York Heart Association grade III to IV); galactosemia; pregnancy or lactation; history of alcohol or drug abuse; and previous allergic reactions. All patients had a complete physical and neurological examination, routine blood tests, and a 12-lead ECG. Informed consent to ultrasound examination was given by all subjects.
Technical Equipment and Ultrasound Contrast Agent
The technical equipment consisted of the Hewlett Packard Sonos 5500 duplex device, which was connected to a 1.8/3.6-MHz sector transducer (S3 probe, Hewlett Packard) capable of fundamental and harmonic imaging. All harmonic imaging studies were stored on a magneto-optical disc and analyzed offline. For harmonic imaging, 2.5 g of a galactose-based ultrasound contrast agent (Levovist, Schering AG) was used in a concentration of 400 mg/mL. The ultrasound contrast agent was applied as a bolus by an infusion pump (Pulsar, Medrad) at a rate of 2.5 mL/s into the antecubital vein, which was cannulated with an 18-gauge catheter. The second injection for investigation of the coronal plane was given after a 30-minute interval.
Harmonic Imaging Studies
Each examination was started in B-mode with the use of the transtemporal approach. After depiction of the hypointense butterfly-shaped brain stem, the probe was shifted 10 degrees upward in transverse axial examination or 10 degrees forward in coronal examination to depict the diencephalic plane of section, with the third ventricle in the middle and the thalami on its sides. These anatomic structures are easily recognized because of their different echogenicities: the lumen of the third ventricle is very hypointense, whereas its margins are clearly hyperintense, and the flanking elliptical thalami are hypointense again. To rule out the inclusion of larger vessels in the investigated plane, an angio mode image was obtained, and the investigated plane was adjusted, if needed, before the quickset was switched to the acoustic quantification mode. This mode provides an integrated online capability to measure the average acoustic image intensity within a user-specified ROI and is based on the integrated backscatter technology. Integrated backscatter is a relative measure of the total ultrasonic energy backscattered by a small volume of the interrogated tissue. To enable offline generation of time-intensity curves, the acoustic densitometry time-intensity study type was used. Harmonic imaging studies were performed at a low insonation depth of 10 cm to increase spatial resolution. Depth gain compensation was optimized before the start of the harmonic examination. In each examination 62 time-triggered images were recorded at a rate of 1 frame every 2.5 seconds, so that the whole examination lasted roughly 2.5 minutes. The ultrasound contrast agent was applied after 3 baseline images.
For offline analysis of the data, the acoustic densitometry unit was used to quantify contrast intensity of the integrated backscatter, calculating time-intensity curves in 3 different ROIs. Analyzed ROIs were the ipsilateral thalamus (ROIthal); the lentiform nucleus (ROIncl) (circular ROIs with a sample area of 21x21 pixels, which have been established in previous studies by Postert et al26 and Seidel et al27,29); and the middle cerebral artery territory (ROImca), a user-specified ROI that includes the whole brain region that is supplied by this artery. Figures 1 and 2 give an overview of the ROIs in both insonation planes. For a better anatomic overview, these images are in B-mode and at a depth of 14 cm.
|
|
PI (decibels) and PG (decibels per second), which is the PI divided by the TP, were obtained from the calculated time-intensity curve and used for statistical analysis. To match the transverse axial and the coronal insonation planes, these parameters were compared between corresponding ROIs in the 2 insonation planes. To evaluate the reliability of PI and PG, both parameters were compared between the 3 different ROIs in the transverse axial plane. Baseline for each calculated time-intensity curve was the mean acoustic intensity of the first 3 images before ultrasound contrast agent application.
The Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant at values of P<0.05.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
General
No adverse effects were observed after contrast medium administration. Anatomic structures could be identified easily in B mode. Signal intensity decreased in harmonic mode, but image quality was well preserved. However, in integrated backscatter mode, spatial resolution was usually lower. Strong contrast enhancement was detected, particularly in the basal ganglia and, to a lesser extent, in the thalamus in all patients (Figures 3 and 4). In most patients the time-intensity curve had not reached the baseline at the end of the examination.
|
|
Transverse Axial Versus Coronal Scan
No significant differences in PI and PG were found when the insonation planes were compared. Both parameters were lower in the coronal plane. Mean PI in the 3 ROIs ranged from 5.5 to 9.3 dB in the transverse axial plane and from 4.5 to 8.6 dB in the coronal plane, while mean PG varied between 0.21 and 0.42 dB/s and between 0.15 and 0.47 dB/s, respectively. Quantitative data of mean PI and PG for both insonation planes are displayed in Table 1.
|
Comparison Between Different ROIs in the Transverse Axial Plane
There were considerable interindividual differences of PI and PG, as shown by the wide ranges (Table 1). Intraindividual PIs also varied to a large extent, but there was much less variation when PGs in the 3 different ROIs were compared. The mean PG was comparable in ROIthal and ROImca (P=0.42), although it was significantly lower in ROIthal than in ROIncl (P=0.001). Detailed data of these parameters are displayed in Table 2. Figure 4 demonstrates the time-intensity curves of the 3 ROIs from a transverse axial examination. While the PIs differ considerably, PGs clearly have approximately the same grade of inclination.
|
Middle Cerebral Artery Territory
The analysis of the newly introduced, comparatively large ROImca demonstrated time-intensity curves comparable to those of the established ROIs, with smaller PIs (Tables 1 and 2). Placement of this ROI was simple and allowed fewer options for variation than the placement of the smaller ROIs.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
A number of recent studies have shown that the transcranial application of SHI enables relative quantification of normal brain perfusion as well as the disturbance of cerebral perfusion in acute ischemic stroke.26–33 Additional investigation of the coronal insonation plane, as performed in other methods for cerebral perfusion studies, is of particular importance because ultrasonic application on the transverse axial plane only enables partial depiction of the brain: planes from the base of the skull up to the lateral ventricles are well visualized, but any apical region near the top of the skull or the temporobasal region can only be depicted with the use of the coronal plane. We conclude that the coronal plane is suitable for use on a regular basis since the analysis of both insonation planes showed no significant differences between the PI and PG of corresponding ROIs. Moreover, perfusion studies in 2 planes may enable the quantitative analysis of the dimension of a perfusion disturbed area of the brain. SHI studies on myocardial perfusion in multiple views have shown that this technique can accurately identify regional myocardial perfusion abnormalities.34 Thus, for example, the size of an ischemic infarct might be predicted more precisely than if only 1 plane was assessed.
Analysis of time-intensity curves of the contrast enhancement after ultrasound contrast agent application showed wide interindividual and intraindividual variation in PIs, which depend on the frequency, insonation depth, and thickness of the temporal bone. We observed >10-fold differences in decibels between different patients as well as wide-ranging values in different ROIs of the same patient. Thus, the PI is not a sufficient parameter for either the absolute or the relative quantification of brain tissue perfusion.26 Previous studies have suggested the area under the curve of the time-intensity curve as the most robust parameter for the semiquantitative analysis of brain tissue perfusion and attempted to provide normal quantitative data of SHI examinations of cerebral echo contrast enhancement.29,35 In this study the analysis of the time-intensity curves showed that the baseline intensity before contrast application is seldom reached in the washout phase after the ultrasound contrast agent application. In our opinion, the area under the curve is therefore not a trustworthy parameter for the assessment of brain tissue perfusion. The results of our study indicate that the PG, a ratio of PI divided by TP, is a more robust and consequently a more reliable parameter for the evaluation of cerebral perfusion: no significant differences were found in the comparison of mean PGs of ROIthal and ROImca. These data are supported by recent results of 2 additional SHI studies indicating that the TP is a robust parameter for semiquantitative analysis of brain tissue perfusion, a parameter that forms part of PG.36,37 In our view, differences in mean PGs of ROIthal and ROIncl indicate that the assessment of ROIncl in general is the most questionable of the ROIs assessed in this study. While placement of ROIthal is simple, since the thalamus is an easily identifiable anatomic structure because of its hypodensity in comparison to the surrounding tissue, placement of ROIncl is comparatively user dependent, and because of the absence of any striking echogenous structure, the position relies mainly on the instructions for the placement of this ROI. In contrast, the placement of ROImca is less variable not only because of its size but especially because its margins are well defined by the adjacent anatomic structures. We could show that analysis of the contrast enhancement in this ROI resulted in equivalent time-intensity curves compared with those of the established ROIthal. In addition, we suggest that the examination of this newly introduced ROI possesses additional advantages. First, the enclosure of large vessels in the analyzed ROI has less impact than if this occurred during analysis of a small ROI, where an accidentally enclosed vessel segment could, in the worst case, constitute the whole ROI. Enclosure of a large vessel hinders the accurate analysis of parenchymal perfusion because the contrast enhancement of a large vessel appears earlier and has stronger contrast intensities than parenchymal contrast. Second, minor shifts of the probe and subsequently of the insonated plane, which are aggravated by the relatively long duration of the examination, have less influence on the contrast curve if a large ROI is assessed than if a small ROI is assessed, in which case a slight shift of the insonated plane might alter the entire ROI.
Another limitation of this new technique is the attenuation of the ultrasound beam, which depends on the insonation depth, the thickness of the temporal bone, and the second harmonic receiving frequency (3.6 MHz in our study). The variability of the temporal bone thickness provokes additional asymmetrical attenuation and may cause ambiguous absolute data. According to previous studies, we presume that in view of the depth dependency of the enhancing effect, adequate interpretation of SHI studies is only feasible ipsilateral to the examined side because analyses of contralateral ROIs result in misleading time-intensity curves that are not comparable to those of the ipsilateral side.27,29 An independent examination of each side is therefore recommended.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that SHI enables visualization and measurement of echo enhancement in perfused areas of the human brain. Additional application of the coronal insonation plane allows evaluation of brain regions that cannot be depicted in the transverse axial plane, such as the temporobasal region or the region near the skull. A second insonation plane also facilitates detection of focal perfusion abnormalities and more reliable prediction of size. In our opinion, in comparison to the PI and the area under the curve, the PG is a more reliable and the most robust parameter for relative evaluation of brain tissue perfusion. Examination of the newly introduced ROImca may provide more reliable data in comparison to other ROIs because its placement is less subjective and accidental inclusion of larger vessels or slight shifts of the insonated plane have less effect on the contrast curve than in a smaller ROI. This novel, noninvasive technique, which is easily applied and can be repeated as often as needed, is not only comparatively inexpensive but is also applicable to critically ill, bedridden patients. In any patient in whom focal cerebral perfusion abnormalities are suspected, SHI might provide additional as well as alternative information concerning alterations of brain tissue perfusion.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors wish to thank Dr K. Willmes-von Hinckeldey for his help with statistical analysis and Dr Stuart Fellows and Dr Jorg Larsen for their thoughtful review of the manuscript.
Received August 3, 2001; revision received February 18, 2002; accepted February 18, 2002.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionSubjects and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Ostergard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages, part II: experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med. 1990; 36: 726–736.
2.
Rordorf G, Koroshetz W, Copen WA, Cramer SC, Schaefer PW, Budzik RF, Schwamm LH, Buonanno F, Sorensen GA, Gonzaelz G. Regional ischemia and ischemic injury in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke as defined by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted MRI. Stroke. 1998; 29: 939–943.
3.
Tong DC, Yenari MA, Albers GW, O’Brien M, Marks MP, Moseley ME. Correlation of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 hour) ischemic stroke. Neurology. 1998; 50: 864–870.
4.
Alexandrov AV, Black SE, Ehrlich LE, Bladin CF, Smurawska LT, Pirisi A, Caldwell CB. Simple visual analysis of brain perfusion on HMPAO SPECT predicts early outcome in acute stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1537–1542.
5.
Catafau AM. Brain SPECT in clinical practice, part I: perfusion. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42: 259–271.
6. Camargo EE. Brain SPECT in neurology and psychiatry. J Nucl Med. 2001; 4: 611–623.
7.
Heiss WD, Kracht LW, Thiel A, Grond M, Pawlik G. Penumbral probability thresholds of flumazenil binding and blood flow predicting tissue outcome in patients with cerebral ischaemia. Brain. 2001; 124: 20–29.
8.
Baron J-C. Mapping the ischaemic penumbra with PET: a new approach. Brain. 2001; 124: 2–4.
9. Chapman JD, Schneider RF, Urbain JL, Hanks GE. Single-photon emission computed tomography and positron-emission tomography assays for tissue oxygenation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2001; 11: 47–57.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Gillard JH, Minhas PS, Hayball MP, Bearcroft PW, Antoun NM, Freer CE, Mathews JC, Miles KA, Pickard JD. Assessment of quantitative computed tomographic cerebral perfusion imaging with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. Neurol Res. 2000; 22: 457–464.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. De Jong N, Ten Cate FJ, Lancee CT, Roelandt JR, Bom N. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 1991; 29: 324–330.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Schrope B, Newhouse VL, Uhlendorf V. Simulated capillary blood flow measurement using a nonlinear ultrasonic contrast agent. Ultrason Imaging. 1992; 14: 134–158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Schrope B, Newhouse VL. Second harmonic blood perfusion measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1993; 19: 567–579.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Burns PN, Powers JE, Fritzsch T. Harmonic imaging: new imaging and Doppler method for contrast enhanced ultrasound. Radiology. 1992; 185: 142.Abstract.
15. Burns PN. Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. Clin Radiol. 1996; 51: 50–55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wiencek JG, Feinstein SB, Walker R, Aronson S. Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantification of perfusion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993; 6: 395–416.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Porter TR, Xie F. Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Circulation. 1995; 92: 2391–2395.
18. Forsberg F, Goldberg BB, Liu J-B, Merton DA, Rawool NM. On the feasibility of real-time, in vivo harmonic imaging with proteinaceous microspheres. J Ultrasound Med. 1996; 15: 853–860.[Abstract]
19. Porter TR, Xie F, Kricsfeld D, Armbruster RW. Improved myocardial contrast with second harmonic transient ultrasound response imaging in humans using intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1497–1501.[Abstract]
20. Schwarz KQ, Chen X, Steinmetz S, Phillips D. Harmonic imaging with Levovist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10: 1–10.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Kono Y, Moriyasu F, Nada T, Suginoshita Y, Matsumura T, Kobayashi K, Nakamura T, Chiba T. Gray scale second harmonic imaging of the liver: a preliminary animal study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23: 719–726.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Hancock J, Dittrich H, Jewitt DE, Monaghan MJ. Evaluation of myocardial, hepatic and renal perfusion in a variety of clinical conditions using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent (Optison) and second harmonic imaging. Heart. 1999; 81: 636–641.
23. Firschke C, Lindner JR, Wei K, Goodman NC, Skyba DM, Kaul S. Myocardial perfusion imaging in the setting of coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction using venous injection of a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent. Circulation. 1997; 96: 959–967.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Wilson SR, Burns PN, Muradali D, Wilson JA, Lai X. Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis. Radiology. 2000; 215: 153–161.
25.
Heckemann RA, Cosgrove DO, Blomley MJ, Eckersley RJ, Harvey CJ, Mine Y. Liver lesions: intermittent second-harmonic gray-scale US can increase conspicuity with microbubble contrast material: early experience. Radiology. 2000; 216: 592–596.
26.
Postert T, Muhs A, Meves S, Federlein J, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Transient response harmonic imaging. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1901–1907.
27. Seidel G, Greis C, Sonne J, Kaps M. Harmonic gray scale imaging of the human brain. J Neuroimaging. 1999; 9: 171–174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Postert T, Federlein J, Weber S, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Second harmonic imaging in acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1702–1706.
29.
Seidel G, Algermissen C, Christoph A, Claassen L, Vidal-Langwasser M, Katzer T. Harmonic imaging of the human brain. Stroke. 2000; 31: 151–154.
30.
Federlein J, Postert T, Meves S, Weber S, Przuntek H, Büttner T. Ultrasonic evaluation of pathological brain perfusion in acute stroke using second harmonic imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 69: 616–622.
31.
Seidel G, Algermissen C, Christoph A, Katzer T, Kaps M. Visualization of brain perfusion with harmonic gray scale and power Doppler technology: an animal pilot study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1728–1734.
32.
Wiesmann M, Seidel G. Ultrasound perfusion imaging of the human brain. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2421–2425.
33.
Itoh T, Matsumoto M, Uchimoto R, Takahashi N, Niwa K, Handa N, Tsukamoto Y, Miyazawa T, Kamada T. Perfusion imaging of the brain by B-mode ultrasonography. Stroke. 1995; 26: 2353–2357.
34. Porter TR, Li S, Kricsfeld D, Armbruster RW. Detection of myocardial perfusion in multiple echocardiographic windows with one intravenous injection of microbubbles using transient response second harmonic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 791–799.[Abstract]
35. Postert T, Federlein J, Rose J, Przuntek H, Weber S, Büttner T. Ultrasonic assessment of physiological echo-contrast agent distribution in brain parenchyma with transient response second harmonic imaging. J Neuroimaging. 2001; 11: 18–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Postert T, Hölscher T, Meves S, Thies T, Ermert H, Wilkening W. Perfusionsdiagnostik des Gehirns mit echokontrastspezifischen Ultra- schallverfahren und Optison. Ultraschall Med. 2001; 22: S23.Abstract.[CrossRef]
37. Postert T, Meves S, Schmid G, Hölscher T, Ermert H, Wilkening W. Korrelation von echokontrastspezifischen Ultraschallverfahren mit Perfusions-MRT zur Diagnostik von Hirnperfusion. Ultraschall Med. 2001; 22: S89.Abstract.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J U Harrer, L Mayfrank, M Mull, and C Klotzsch Second harmonic imaging: a new ultrasound technique to assess human brain tumour perfusion J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2003; 74(3): 333 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||