(Stroke. 2002;33:2232.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neuroradiology (T.E.M., H.J.B.) and Neurology (G.F.H.), Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Thomas Mayer, Abteilung Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Grosshadern, 81377 München, Germany. E-mail T.E.Mayer{at}ikra.med.uni-muenchen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Five patients with acute embolism of the basilar artery who presented with progressive stroke and impaired consciousness were included in a multicenter study (Neuronet Evaluation in Embolic Stroke Disease [NEED]). In 3 patients flow reversal was induced with the use of silicone balloons or coaxial catheters. Three patients required additional fibrinolysis.
Results The device failed to retrieve the clots in our first 2 patients with distal basilar artery embolism. After successful recanalization by local fibrinolysis, both patients survived, 1 disabled and 1 with little residual impairment. In the next 3 patients the anterograde flow in the basilar artery was reversed during the short retraction period by temporarily blocking the vertebral or subclavian arteries. Two of these patients were completely recanalized by solely mechanical means; the third patient needed additional fibrinolysis before also being recanalized. All 3 patients survived: 1 remained disabled, 1 had almost a full recovery, and 1 became asymptomatic the day after the procedure.
Conclusions Mechanical thrombus extraction seems to be a feasible method for preventing infarction by rapid, complete, and safe recanalization of the basilar artery. We recommend the use of flow control to support retrieval of the thrombus (which the proximal flow would otherwise keep in place like a cork) and to protect the distal vessels from embolization by fragments.
Key Words: basilar artery stroke, acute thrombi
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The device was used without flow control in the first 2 patients. Flow reversal was induced in the basilar artery in the last 3 patients during retraction by transiently blocking both vertebral arteries with nondetachable silicone balloons (patient 3), the left subclavian artery with a nondetachable silicone balloon (patient 4), and both vertebral arteries with coaxial catheters (patient 5). Patients 1, 2, and 4 were also administered recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) intra-arterially.
Because none of the patients were conscious enough to consent to participate, an independent neurologist approved of their inclusion in the study in accordance with the requirements of our local ethics committee.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The angiographic results are given in Table 1. Four initial attempts in the first 2 patients with distal basilar artery thromboembolism failed to retract the embolus. In the first patient, the device either did not load properly or did not hold the clots. In the second patient, only a small part of the thrombus was eliminated but not recovered. Both patients were then successfully recanalized by local fibrinolysis (120 and 85 mg rtPA for 3 and 2 hours, respectively). Occlusions due to thrombus migration remained in the P2 segments of the posterior cerebral artery (in patient 1 on the right, in patient 2 on the left).
|
Proximal vertebral or subclavian blockade was temporarily applied in the next 3 patients to control basilar artery flow. The thrombus was retracted from the basilar artery in patients 3 and 5 by the device. Suction was also applied during retraction in patient 5, and 40 minutes after the start of angiography the vertebrobasilar system was completely recanalized without distal embolization (Figure 2). In the third patient a part of the thrombus was lost in the left vertebral artery at the confluens. The balloon in the right vertebral artery was then deflated, and flow to the basilar artery was reestablished. Blockade of the left vertebral artery was maintained until the thrombus could be suctioned into the coaxial catheter. Complete recanalization was achieved (Figure 3). Three retraction maneuvers were necessary in the fourth patient: at first the left P1 segment of the PCA was recanalized, then the right P1, and finally the basilar tip. After a remaining portion in the basilar tip was treated by local fibrinolysis (60 mg rtPA), complete recanalization was achieved (Figure 4, Table 1).
|
|
|
The retrieved material in the last 3 patients was identified histologically to be fresh thrombus. The relation of thrombocytes to erythrocytes to leukocytes in the thrombus was found to be 25%/60%/15% (patient 3), 35%/30%/35% (patient 4), and 50%/40%/10% (patient 5), respectively.
All 5 patients were still alive at the 3-month follow-up. Patient 3 was neurologically asymptomatic soon after intervention (from Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4 and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 24 at admission), patient 4 also recovered to a great extent on the first day, and patient 1 became well within a few days (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are reports that the use of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors abciximab and tirofiban, in combination with fibrinolysis, seems to improve recanalization without increasing bleedings.1113 Several studies are now in progress, but prospective multicenter studies are necessary to determine whether systemic or intra-arterial therapy provides the best benefit for patients. It is likely that both methods or a combination of the 2 will be the answer. The problem is demonstrated by a case in which the combination of heparinization, urokinase, and abciximab did not succeed in recanalizing the middle cerebral artery, but a mechanical device (goose neck snare) was effective.14
Initially we had hoped that the device would help to reduce large thrombus masses, shorten recanalization time, avoid distal embolization, and provide an alternative treatment for patients in whom fibrinolysis is contraindicated. Despite the good results achieved with human thrombus in the flow model and in animal experiments, the device failed if the basilar artery flow was not reversed. Even low antegrade flow in the artery limited the success of the device. Additional means, such as suction with a coaxial catheter or connection with the venous system, are necessary. Flow control by silicone balloons requires extra time for additional arterial accesses; however, our last case demonstrated that recanalization time can still be shortened if fibrinolysis can be avoided. The use of coaxial catheter suction alone often proves unsuccessful if the catheter is not near the clot. It is remarkable that when flow control is used, distal embolization does not occur. Since blockade of the vertebral or the subclavian arteries was necessary for only a few minutes, this should not harm the patients. While the neurological deficits of 2 patients immediately improved after use of this technique, 1 patient remained unchanged as a result of pontine infarction at the level of the embolus. Nevertheless, it is necessary to determine the possible complications in further studies.
While the use of the current device is helpful for recanalization procedures in acute thromboembolic stroke, it must still be improved. On the basis of our preliminary experience with various mechanical devices for extracting thrombus material from the intracranial arteries, we recommend the use of flow control to support the retrieval of the thrombus (which the proximal flow would otherwise keep in place like a cork) and to protect the distal vessels from embolization due to settling fragments. While carotid stent systems for proximal flow control are becoming increasingly available, they are too large. Devices appropriate for proximal flow control also must be developed for the posterior circulation.
Conclusion
Mechanical thrombus extraction is a feasible method for preventing infarction by rapid, complete, and safe recanalization of the basilar artery. The Guidant Neuronet device requires flow reversal to ensure a successful recanalization.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 4, 2002; revision received March 19, 2002; accepted April 17, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. G. Stead, R. M. Gilmore, M. F. Bellolio, A. A. Rabinstein, and W. W. Decker Percutaneous Clot Removal Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Arch Neurol, August 1, 2008; 65(8): 1024 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, T. Kunieda, N. Takabatake, S. Yamamoto, and M. Watanabe Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 773 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Brekenfeld, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, K. Nedeltchev, M. Reinert, J. Slotboom, and J. Gralla Mechanical Thromboembolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of the Catch Thromboectomy Device and the Merci Retriever In Vivo Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1213 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, H. Bruckmann, G.F. Hamann, M. Mull, M. Liebetrau, W. Weber, D. Kuhne, and T.E. Mayer Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications after Intra-Arterial Fibrinolysis in Vertebrobasilar Occlusion AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2007; 28(2): 378 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, N. Takabatake, T. Kunieda, H. Shimizu, and M. Watanabe Clot Removal Therapy by Aspiration and Extraction for Acute Embolic Carotid Occlusion AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Marder, D. J. Chute, S. Starkman, A. M. Abolian, C. Kidwell, D. Liebeskind, B. Ovbiagele, F. Vinuela, G. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, et al. Analysis of Thrombi Retrieved From Cerebral Arteries of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2086 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Demertzis, R. Trunfio, F. von Rotz, and F. Siclari Surgical Approach in Massive Intraoperative Atherosclerotic Embolism Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2298 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Lindsberg and H. P. Mattle Therapy of Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Analysis Comparing Intra-Arterial and Intravenous Thrombolysis Stroke, March 1, 2006; 37(3): 922 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bergui, G. Stura, D. Daniele, P. Cerrato, M. Berardino, and G. B. Bradac Mechanical Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Attributable to Basilar Artery Occlusion as First-Line Treatment Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Favrole, J P Saint-Maurice, M G Bousser, and E Houdart Use of mechanical extraction devices in basilar artery occlusion J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2005; 76(10): 1462 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina and J. L. Saver Extending Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Emerging Pharmacological, Mechanical, and Imaging Strategies Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2311 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Mayer, G. F. Hamann, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, and H. Bruckmann Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Occlusion by Using a Coronary Waterjet Thrombectomy Device: A Pilot Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1389 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, and M. Watanabe Successful Thrombectomy in Acute Terminal Internal Carotid Occlusion Using a Basket Type Microsnare in Conjunction with Temporary Proximal Occlusion: A Case Report AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1395 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Versnick, H. M. Do, G. W. Albers, D. C. Tong, and M. P. Marks Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 875 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pierre Gobin, S. Starkman, G. R. Duckwiler, T. Grobelny, C. S. Kidwell, R. Jahan, J. Pile-Spellman, A. Segal, F. Vinuela, and J. L. Saver MERCI 1: A Phase 1 Study of Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2848 - 2854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berlis, H. Lutsep, S. Barnwell, A. Norbash, L. Wechsler, C. A. Jungreis, A. Woolfenden, G. Redekop, M. Hartmann, and M. Schumacher Mechanical Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Endovascular Photoacoustic Recanalization Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): 1112 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yu, D. Binder, A. Foster-Barber, R. Malek, W. S. Smith, and R. T. Higashida Endovascular embolectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion Neurology, November 25, 2003; 61(10): 1421 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hahnel, P. D. Schellinger, A. Gutschalk, K. Geletneky, M. Hartmann, M. Knauth, and K. Sartor Local Intra-arterial Fibrinolysis of Thromboemboli Occurring During Neuroendovascular Procedures With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1723 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mayer, G. Hamann, and H. Brueckmann Extraction of an Embolus N. Engl. J. Med., February 6, 2003; 348(6): 557 - 557. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |