| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:2367.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., A.E.H., A.H., J.C.M.W., M.M.B.B.) and Department of Neurology (M.H., P.J.K.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (M.L.B., D.E.G.), the Netherlands.
Correspondence to Monique M.B. Breteler, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands. E-mail m.breteler{at}erasmusmc.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods The study was based on the prospective cohort of the Rotterdam Study and included 6913 participants who did not suffer from previous stroke. At baseline, carotid intima-media thickness and plaques, ankle-arm index, and aortic calcifications were assessed; 3996 participants (53%) had measures of all studied markers of atherosclerosis. After a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 378 strokes occurred. Data were analyzed with Cox proportional-hazards regression and Akaike information criteria scores.
Results Carotid intima-media thickness and aortic calcifications were related most strongly to the risk of stroke (relative risk, 2.23 and 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.48 to 3.36 and 1.28 to 2.80 for highest versus lowest tertile, respectively). The relations between intima-media thickness, aortic calcifications, and carotid plaques and stroke remained after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Intima-media thickness and aortic calcifications were related to the risk of stroke independently of each other. The relation between ankle-arm index and stroke disappeared after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors.
Conclusions Carotid intima-media thickness and aortic calcifications are stronger predictors of incident stroke than carotid plaque or ankle-arm indexes. They have additional value to each other and to classic risk factors and may reflect different processes.
Key Words: atherosclerosis epidemiology risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See Editorial Comment, page 2372
classic cardiovascular risk factors in relation to stroke are limited.9 We evaluated and compared the strength of the relation between carotid plaques, carotid IMT, ankle-arm index, and aortic calcifications in relation to stroke in a population of elderly subjects.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
55 years of age were invited. People living in homes for the elderly were included. Participation rate of those invited for the study was 78%; in total, 7983 subjects participated.10 The Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus University Rotterdam approved the study. Written informed consent to retrieve information from treating physicians was obtained from all participants. Baseline measurements were obtained from 1990 through 1993 and consisted of a home interview and 2 visits to the research center for physical examination. A total of 7721 participants were free of previous stroke. At the baseline visit to the research center, we assessed several measures of atherosclerosis: carotid IMT, carotid plaques, ankle-arm index, and aortic calcifications. The study population consisted of 6913 persons who had assessment of at least 1 measure of atherosclerosis.
Assessment of Atherosclerosis at Baseline
Carotid IMT and Carotid Plaques
Participants underwent B-mode ultrasonography of both carotid arteries. We measured IMT of the common carotid artery and presence of plaques in both carotid arteries according to a standardized protocol as published previously.1,6,11
Ankle-Arm Index
The systolic blood pressure of the posterior tibial artery was measured on both sides with an 8-MHz continuous-wave Doppler probe (Huntleigh 500 D, Huntleigh Technology) and a random-zero sphygmomanometer. Sitting blood pressure of the right arm was measured twice with a random-zero sphygmomanometer. Mean blood pressure was used to calculate the ankle-arm index for each leg. In the analyses, we used the lowest measurement. Because of possible measurement artifacts reflecting the presence of rigid or calcified walls, 36 participants with an ankle-arm index >1.5 were excluded.
Aortic Calcification
Aortic calcification was diagnosed by radiographic detection of calcified deposits in the abdominal aorta.8 At baseline, lateral abdominal films (T12 through S1) were made from a fixed distance while the subject was seated. Aortic calcifications were considered present when linear densities were seen in an area parallel and anterior to the lumbar spine (L1 through L4). Baseline values for the extent of calcification were scored into 5 categories according to the length of the involved area (1 plaque, 0.5 to 1.0 cm; several disseminated plaques, <2.5, 2.5 to 4.9, 5.0 to 9.9, and
10 cm).
The numbers of participants with data available on carotid IMT, plaques, ankle-arm index, and aortic calcifications were 5479, 5440, 6196, and 5631, respectively. Data on all measurements of atherosclerosis were available for 3996 participants (53% of the 6913 participants without previous stroke). Logistical reasons such as limited availability of ultrasonographers mainly accounted for the fact that not all measurements were available for all participants. Furthermore, x-rays were not taken at the very beginning of the study. Because in most instances a lack of measures of atherosclerosis was not related to participant characteristics, we do not think that restriction to persons with all measurements has caused a serious selection bias. Participants with all measures available were on average 4.6 years younger (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 5.1), were more often male (41% versus 38%; P<0.05 adjusted for age), had 2.6 mm Hghigher (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.7) systolic blood pressure, and had 0.09-mmol/L-higher (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1) total cholesterol levels compared with participants with missing values for
1 measures of atherosclerosis (adjusted for age and/or sex). We observed no differences in diastolic blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, and cholesterol.
Assessment of Stroke
History of stroke or transient ischemic attack at baseline was assessed and verified as described previously.6 Once subjects enter the Rotterdam Study, they are continuously monitored for major events through automated linkage of the study database with files from general practitioners and the municipality. For reported events, additional information was obtained from hospital records. A neurologist (P.J.K.) reviewed information on all possible strokes and classified the stroke as definite, probable, or possible. A stroke was definite if the diagnosis was based on typical clinical symptoms and neuroimaging excluded other diagnoses. A stroke was considered probable if typical clinical symptoms were present but neuroimaging was not performed. For fatal strokes, other causes of death, especially cardiac, should have been excluded. A stroke was classified as possible if clinical symptoms were less typical and neuroimaging was not performed or if a cardiac cause of death could not be excluded in case of reported stroke. Subclassification into hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke was based on neuroimaging, which was available for 61% of all patients. Follow-up was available for all participants until January 1, 1999.
Cardiovascular Disease Status and Risk Factors
Information on current health status and medical history at baseline was obtained with a computerized questionnaire. All reported myocardial infarctions were verified by medical records. History of intermittent claudication and angina pectoris was assessed through the Rose questionnaire. Nonfasting blood samples were taken, and serum total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured with an automated enzymatic procedure. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of
140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of
90 mm Hg. Diabetes mellitus was defined as use of oral blood glucoselowering drugs or insulin or random or postload serum glucose level >11.0 mmol/L, according to the World Health Organization criteria. Atrial fibrillation was assessed by ECG. A history of cardiovascular disease was coded if participants had a history of transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, intermittent claudication, atrial fibrillation, coronary bypass surgery, and/or coronary angioplasty.
Data Analysis
We evaluated the relationship between carotid IMT, carotid plaques, ankle-arm index, and aortic calcifications and risk of first-ever stroke and cerebral infarction using Cox regression analysis. Data were analyzed in several ways. First, to check for gross deviations from linearity, we assessed the risks in participants in tertiles, taking the least severe atherosclerosis as the reference. A composite atherosclerosis score was obtained by adding up the scores for the separate measures of atherosclerosis (range, 0 to 8). We further analyzed carotid IMT and ankle-arm index per-SD increase and carotid plaques and aortic calcifications per unit increase. Analyses were adjusted for age and sex and for diabetes mellitus (yes, no), smoking (current, former, never), systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and HDL cholesterol levels. Results are presented as relative risks with corresponding 95% CIs.
We used Akaike optimal information criteria (AIC) to evaluate the prognostic ability of the measures of atherosclerosis compared with a reference model.12 This method allows us to take both follow-up time and differences in numbers of degrees of freedom into account. The height of the AIC score reflects the prognostic value; a positive score indicates that adding the measure of atherosclerosis results in an improvement in the reference model. The AIC was calculated as the
2 statistic of the significant change for the extended model compared with a reference model minus 2 times the number of degrees of freedom. For these analyses, we restricted ourselves to participants with information available on all measures of atherosclerosis. We entered carotid IMT and ankle-arm index as continuous variables and carotid plaques and aortic calcifications as categorical variables into the model. First, we used a model including age and sex as reference. Then, the reference model was expanded with diabetes mellitus, smoking, diastolic and systolic blood pressures, total and HDL cholesterol, and history of cardiovascular disease.
We further used stepwise regression analysis to assess which measures of atherosclerosis were independently related to the risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. Age and sex were forced into the model. Finally, we tested for interaction between atherosclerosis and smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and previous myocardial infarction.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, we analyzed all measures of atherosclerosis in a stepwise regression model in which we forced the variables age and sex. For both stroke and cerebral infarction, carotid IMT and aortic calcifications were included (P<0.05).
Finally, we failed to find interactions between carotid IMT and aortic calcifications and diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and previous myocardial infarction (P>0.05). The results were similar for stroke and cerebral infarction.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main issue in our study was to determine which measures of atherosclerosis are strongest predictors of the risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. Carotid IMT and ankle-arm index were continuous measures; carotid plaques and aortic calcifications were categorical measures. Evaluation of relative risks in categories allowed us to compare the relative risks.
IMT has been investigated widely as a measure of generalized atherosclerosis. Our results show the robustness of the relation between IMT and stroke. Presence of aortic calcifications was an important risk indicator for stroke, even when information on carotid IMT or cardiovascular risk factors was taken into account. Two mechanisms could explain the persistence of such association. First, calcifications could reflect arterial stiffness, leading to hypertension and stroke. The relationships remained significant after adjustment for blood pressure, and arterial stiffness has not consistently been shown to be a risk factor for stroke.13 Still, this hypothesis should not be overlooked because 1 measurement of blood pressure is a poor reflection of the lifetime exposure. Another explanation to consider is that calcifications may represent the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic arch or carotid arteries from which emboli can be released. A plausible explanation for our finding that IMT and aortic calcifications are related to stroke independently of each other is that both markers of atherosclerosis reflect different processes, as we described. Ankle-arm index was the poorest predictor for stroke because it lost its predictive ability after cardiovascular risk factors were taken into account. This result supports the findings by the other population-based cohort studies in which the relation between ankle-arm index and stroke also diminished after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors.14 Our study confirms that ankle-arm index has little prognostic ability beyond traditional risk factors for stroke and cerebral infarction. In summary, carotid IMT and aortic calcifications are the strongest predictors of stroke. Carotid IMT, plaques, and aortic calcifications have additional value to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The results of our study merit further research on individual stroke risk assessment that includes measures of atherosclerosis. In addition to carotid IMT, information on calcifications in the vessel wall may help in identifying people at high risk of stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 10, 2003; revision received June 11, 2003; accepted June 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Gonzalez, J. C. Wood, F. J. Dorey, T. A. L. Wren, and V. Gilsanz Reproducibility of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Young Adults Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M J E van Rijn, M J Bos, A Isaacs, M Yazdanpanah, A Arias-Vasquez, B H C. Stricker, O H Klungel, B A Oostra, P J Koudstaal, J C Witteman, et al. Polymorphisms of the renin angiotensin system are associated with blood pressure, atherosclerosis and cerebral white matter pathology J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1083 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Poredos and B. Jug The Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease in High Risk Subjects and Coronary or Cerebrovascular Patients Angiology, July 1, 2007; 58(3): 309 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mupparapu and I. H. Kim Calcified carotid artery atheroma and stroke: A systematic review J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2007; 138(4): 483 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hansen, J. Wikstrom, L.O. Johansson, L. Lind, and H. Ahlstrom The Prevalence and Quantification of Atherosclerosis in an Elderly Population Assessed by Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(3): 649 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Lorenz, H. S. Markus, M. L. Bots, M. Rosvall, and M. Sitzer Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Circulation, January 30, 2007; 115(4): 459 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. E. van Rijn, M. J. Bos, M. Yazdanpanah, A. Isaacs, A. Arias-Vasquez, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, J. C. Witteman, C. M. van Duijn, and M. M. B. Breteler {alpha}-Adducin Polymorphism, Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Risk Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2930 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ikram, M. Hollander, M. J. Bos, J. A. Kors, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, J.C.M. Witteman, and M. M.B. Breteler Unrecognized myocardial infarction and the risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology, November 14, 2006; 67(9): 1635 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Nam, S. W. Han, J. Y. Lee, S. H. Ahn, J. W. Ha, S. J. Rim, B. I. Lee, and J. H. Heo Association of aortic plaque with intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with stroke. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1184 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Dijk, Y. van der Graaf, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, A. Algra, and on behalf of the SMART study group Carotid intima-media thickness and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest atherosclerotic disease: the SMART study Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1971 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Staub, A. Meyerhans, B. Bundi, H. P. Schmid, and B. Frauchiger Prediction of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: Comparison of the Internal Carotid Artery Resistive Index With the Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness Stroke, March 1, 2006; 37(3): 800 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.F. Fanning, T.D. Walters, A.J. Fox, and S.P. Symons Association between Calcification of the Cervical Carotid Artery Bifurcation and White Matter Ischemia. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 378 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sander, C. Schulze-Horn, H. Bickel, H. Gnahn, E. Bartels, and B. Conrad Combined Effects of Hemoglobin A1c and C-Reactive Protein on the Progression of Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis: The INVADE Study Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 351 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Lorenz, S. von Kegler, H. Steinmetz, H. S. Markus, and M. Sitzer Carotid Intima-Media Thickening Indicates a Higher Vascular Risk Across a Wide Age Range: Prospective Data From the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS) Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Harloff, M Handke, A Geibel, E Oehm, B Guschlbauer, M Olschewski, and A Hetzel Do stroke patients with normal carotid arteries require TEE for exclusion of relevant aortic plaques? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 76(12): 1654 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nighoghossian, L. Derex, and P. Douek The Vulnerable Carotid Artery Plaque: Current Imaging Methods and New Perspectives Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2764 - 2772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Elbaz, M. Ripert, B. Tavernier, B. Fevrier, M. Zureik, J. Gariepy, A. Alperovitch, and C. Tzourio Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness, Carotid Plaques, and Walking Speed Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2198 - 2202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kitamura, H. Iso, H. Imano, T. Ohira, T. Okada, S. Sato, M. Kiyama, T. Tanigawa, K. Yamagishi, and T. Shimamoto Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Characteristics as a Risk Factor for Stroke in Japanese Elderly Men Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2788 - 2794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Spence and M. L. Bots Ultrasound Measurement of Atherosclerosis * Response: Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Intervention Studies Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e87 - e88. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Wagenknecht, C. D. Langefeld, J. J. Carr, W. Riley, B. I. Freedman, S. Moossavi, and D. W. Bowden Race-Specific Relationships Between Coronary and Carotid Artery Calcification and Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e97 - e99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Meschia and T. C. Gerber Editorial Comment--Vascular Thickness and Calcification as Markers of Atherosclerotic Burden Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2372 - 2373. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |