| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:695.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Center for Noninvasive Brain Perfusion Studies, Stroke Program, University of Texas, Houston Medical School, Houston.
Correspondence to Dr A. Alexandrov, Department of Neurology, UTHSC, 6431 Fannin, MSB 7.044, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail avalexandrov{at}att.net
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We studied consecutive patients treated with intravenous tPA (0.9 mg/kg within 3 hours) who had M1 or proximal M2 middle cerebral artery occlusion on pretreatment transcranial Doppler according to previously validated criteria. Patients were continuously monitored for 2 hours after tPA bolus to determine complete, partial, or no early recanalization with the Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia (TIBI) flow grading system. A neurologist obtained the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores independently of transcranial Doppler results. DR was defined as a total NIHSS score of 0 to 3 points, and early recovery (ER) was defined improvement by
10 points at 2 hours after tPA bolus. Good long-term outcome was defined as an NIHSS score of 0 to 2 or an mRS score of 0 to 1 at 3 months.
Results Fifty-four patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion had a median prebolus NIHSS score of 16 (range, 6 to 28; 90% with
10 points). The tPA bolus was given at 130±32 minutes (median, 120 minutes; 57% treated within the first 2 hours). DR+ER was observed in 50% of patients with early complete recanalization (n=18), 17% with partial recanalization (n=18), and 0% with no early recanalization (n=18) (P=0.025). Overall, DR+ER was observed in 12 patients (22%), and 9 (75%) had good outcome at 3 months in terms of NIHSS (P=0.009) and mRS (P=0.006) scores compared with non-DR and non-ER patients. If early recanalization was complete, 50% of these patients had good outcome at 3 months, and 78% with DR+ER sustained early clinical benefit. If recanalization was partial, 44% had good long-term outcome, and 66% of patients with DR+ER sustained the benefit. If no early recanalization occurred, 22% had good long-term outcome despite the lack of DR within 2 hours of tPA bolus (P=0.046). Mortality was 11%, 11%, and 39% in patients with complete, partial, and no early recanalization, respectively (P=0.025). Reasons for not sustaining DR in patients with early recanalization were subsequent symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and recurrent ischemic stroke.
Conclusions DR or ER after recanalization within 2 hours after tPA bolus was sustained at 3 months in most patients (75%) in our study. Complete or partial early recanalization leads to better outcome at 3 months after stroke. Fewer patients achieve good long-term outcome without early recanalization.
Key Words: recovery of function stroke thrombolysis ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The benefit of tPA is due to lysis of thrombus and restoration of perfusion to ischemic but not yet infarcted brain tissue.2 This hypothesis is supported by both animal and human studies showing that the duration of impaired perfusion is associated with final infarct volume and that early recanalization correlates with smaller infarct size.35 Studies have also demonstrated relatively high rates of recanalization with continuous transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring and have linked this process to early recovery (ER) in real time.6,7
The question of whether early clinical recovery after recanalization can be sustained long term remains. Some patients in the NINDS trial may have experienced ER, but this was not a predefined end point. In addition, the heterogeneity of this patient population would have made meaningful interpretation of such data difficult. To avoid heterogeneity of ischemic stroke subtypes, we chose to focus our prospective study on patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion who were eligible for standard treatment with tPA during the first 3 hours after stroke. We aimed to determine whether dramatic recovery (DR) or ER within 2 hours of bolus is sustained 3 months after stroke in these patients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A neurologist who was not involved in TCD monitoring obtained the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score before treatment, 2 hours after bolus, and 24 hours after symptom onset. This neurologist was informed of TCD findings before and during tPA therapy. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were obtained via an outpatient visit or structured telephone interview (l7% of all patients) 3 months after stroke. In patients available for outpatient follow-up, a 3-month NIHSS score was also obtained. All 3-month outcome scores were obtained by a neurologist independently of TCD results and previous NIHSS scores (pretreatment, 2 hours after bolus, and 24 hours after onset).
DR was defined as improvement to a total NIHSS score of 0 to 3 points, and ER was defined as improvement by
10 points 2 hours after tPA bolus.12,13 Good long-term outcome was defined as an NIHSS score of 0 to 2 or an mRS score of 0 to 1 three months after stroke.
Independent-sample Students t test was used to test the hypothesis that patients experiencing DR demonstrate improved neurological outcome at 3 months compared with those not experiencing DR. Levenes test was first undertaken to determine the equality of variances between the 2 groups (DR+ER and no DR+ER), followed by 2-tailed Students t test for the differences in good outcomes between those groups. A
2 analysis was used to test for differences in DR+ER and mortality rates in patient subgroups. SPSS 8.0 statistical package was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 points). The tPA bolus was given at 130±32 minutes (median, 120 minutes; 57% treated within the first 2 hours). Overall, DR+ER was observed in 12 patients (22%) at 2 hours and in 19 patients (35%) at 24 hours. A total of 21 patients (39%) achieved good outcome at 3 months (Figure 1). Of those with good 3-month outcome, 19 patients reached mRS scores of 0 to 1, 18 patients had NIHSS scores of 0 to 1, and 3 patients had NIHSS scores of 2 points (mild extremity weakness and mild word-finding difficulties). DR+ER accounted for 11 of 15 patients (73%) with recovery at 24 hours and 9 of 21 patients (43%) with good long-term functional outcome at 3 months. A total of 25 patients (46%) achieved mRS scores of 0 to 2 at 3 months.
|
DR+ER was observed in 9 of 18 patients (50%) with early complete recanalization, in 3 of 18 patients (17%) with partial recanalization, and in 0 of 18 with no early recanalization (P=0.025; Figure 2). Of 12 patients with DR+ER, 9 (75%) had good outcome at 3 months. In the nonDR+ER group (n=42), only 12 patients achieved good outcome (28%). Students t test demonstrated a significant difference in outcome variables, NIHSS score (P=0.009), and mRS score (P=0.006) between DR+ER patients and nonDR+ER patients (the Table).
|
|
If early recanalization was complete, 50% of these patients had good outcome at 3 months, and 78% of patients with DR+ER sustained the early clinical benefit. If recanalization was partial, 44% had good long-term outcome, and 66% of patients with DR+ER sustained the benefit. If no early recanalization occurred, 22% had good long-term outcome despite the lack of DR or ER within 2 hours of tPA bolus (P=0.046,
2).
Intracerebral symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 4 patients (7.4%): 2 had complete recanalization, and 2 had no early recanalization. All 4 hemorrhages were fatal. Our
2 analysis shows that mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with no early recanalization (39%) compared with those with complete (11%) or partial (11%) early recanalization (P=0.025). The reasons that DR or ER was not sustained in patients with early recanalization included subsequent symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (n=1) and recurrent ischemic stroke (n=2).
Despite early occurrence of recanalization, 8 patients with complete and 8 with partial recanalization had poor outcomes at 3 months (mRS, 3 to 5 points and death). The poor functional outcomes in these patients were attributed to the following: fatal intracerebral hemorrhage (n=2), reocclusion within 2 hours of tPA bolus (n=5), recurrent stroke (n=2), and no change in stroke severity (NIHSS) or stroke progression (by
2 NIHSS points) without hemorrhage (n=4). In addition, 1 patient experienced complete motor and speech recovery but had poor outcome because of blindness as a complication of diabetes.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study population is different from that of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study14 because we selected patients with a proximal MCA occlusion on TCD and excluded those with suspected lacunar syndromes or vertebrobasilar ischemia based on urgent vascular ultrasound assessment. The proximal MCA occlusions identified in our patient population parallel those treated in the Intra-Arterial Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (PROACT) study.15 However, the timing of thrombolytic therapy, and hence recanalization, differs between these 2 studies because PROACT allowed treatment within 6 hours of stroke onset. The outcomes found in our study are comparable to those in the PROACT study. For example, mRS scores of 0 to 2 at 3 months were found in 40% in PROACT and 46% in our patients. Mortality rates were also comparable.
Early recanalization and reperfusion of ischemic penumbra are the hypothesized mechanisms for DR and subsequent good long-term outcome.2,5,6 However, DR in the emergency room was observed in fewer than half of the patients with an ultimate good functional outcome. Alternative mechanisms that may be responsible for this long-term benefit include collateralization of flow despite persistence of arterial occlusion; resolution of edema; slow, partial, and late but still nutritious recanalization; neuronal reorganization; and brain tissue metabolic recovery independent of thrombolysis.16,17
Our study has limitations. At our center, we administered tPA therapy to a larger number of patients than we report here. Patients had to be excluded from the study if no pretreatment TCD was performed, if no proximal occlusion was found on pretreatment TCD, if no windows for transcranial insonation were present, or if the patient was unavailable for follow-up (overall rate, 17%). Also, thrombolysis of occlusions at locations other than the proximal M1 or M2 MCA or treatment of patients with lacunar syndromes may yield different results for ER and long-term follow-up.
However, the present study provides data associating early recanalization and DR with long-term outcome. If confirmed in larger studies, DR during or shortly after intravenous tPA therapy may prove a feasible goal of systemic vascular rescue therapies. Conversely, the persistence of a proximal arterial occlusion without signs of early, and at least partial, recanalization should be viewed as a poor prognostic sign, and these patients may be considered more suitable for interventional procedures in the future.18
In conclusion, DR or ER after early recanalization is sustained at 3 months in most patients (75%) in our study. Although the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study did not show a difference in early improvement for the primary end points, our results parallel the posthoc analysis13 suggesting that ER might have occurred in this trial during tPA treatment. Complete or partial recanalization achieved early after tPA bolus often leads to better outcome at 3 months after stroke, and fewer patients achieve good long-term outcome without early recanalization.
Received June 24, 2002; revision received August 8, 2002; accepted August 9, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Sugiura, K. Iwaisako, S. Toyota, and H. Takimoto Simultaneous Treatment with Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 3 Hours of Onset AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1061 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Janjua, A. Alkawi, M.F.K. Suri, and A.I. Qureshi Impact of Arterial Reocclusion and Distal Fragmentation during Thrombolysis among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Uchino and D. C. Anderson Better late than never?: The story of arterial recanalization in acute ischemic stroke Neurology, April 24, 2007; 68(17): 1335 - 1336. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Wunderlich, M. Goertler, T. Postert, E. Schmitt, G. Seidel, G. Gahn, C. Samii, E. Stolz, and For the Duplex Sonography in Acute Stroke (DIAS) S Recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis: Does a recanalization time window exist? Neurology, April 24, 2007; 68(17): 1364 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tsivgoulis, M. Saqqur, V. K. Sharma, A. Y. Lao, M. D. Hill, A. V. Alexandrov, and for the CLOTBUST Investigators Association of Pretreatment Blood Pressure With Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Induced Arterial Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 961 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saqqur, K. Uchino, A. M. Demchuk, C. A. Molina, Z. Garami, S. Calleja, N. Akhtar, F. O. Orouk, A. Salam, A. Shuaib, et al. Site of Arterial Occlusion Identified by Transcranial Doppler Predicts the Response to Intravenous Thrombolysis for Stroke Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 948 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zangerle, S. Kiechl, M. Spiegel, M. Furtner, M. Knoflach, P. Werner, A. Mair, G. Wille, C. Schmidauer, K. Gautsch, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: Predictors and prognostic implications Neurology, January 2, 2007; 68(1): 39 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Shaltoni, K. C. Albright, N. R. Gonzales, R. U. Weir, A. M. Khaja, R. M. Sugg, M. S. Campbell III, E. D. Cacayorin, J. C. Grotta, and E. A. Noser Is Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis Safe After Full-Dose Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke? Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 80 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nedeltchev, U. Fischer, M. Arnold, P. Ballinari, T. Haefeli, L. Kappeler, C. Brekenfeld, L. Remonda, G. Schroth, and H. P. Mattle Long-Term Effect of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 3002 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sugg, J. K. Pary, K. Uchino, S. Baraniuk, H. M. Shaltoni, N. R. Gonzales, R. Mikulik, Z. Garami, S. G. Shaw, D. E. Matherne, et al. Argatroban tPA Stroke Study: Study Design and Results in the First Treated Cohort. Arch Neurol, August 1, 2006; 63(8): 1057 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamaguchi, E. Mori, K. Minematsu, J. Nakagawara, K. Hashi, I. Saito, Y. Shinohara, and for the Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial (J-ACT) Gro Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 3 Hours of Onset: Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial (J-ACT) * Supplemental Appendix 2 Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1810 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sekoranja, J. Loulidi, H. Yilmaz, K. Lovblad, P. Temperli, M. Comelli, and R. F. Sztajzel Intravenous Versus Combined (Intravenous and Intra-Arterial) Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography-Guided Pilot Study Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1805 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.M. Sugg, E.A. Noser, H.M. Shaltoni, N.R. Gonzales, M.S. Campbell, R. Weir, E.D. Cacayorin, and J.C. Grotta Intra-arterial reteplase compared to urokinase for thrombolytic recanalization in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 769 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Marti-Fabregas, M. Borrell, D. Cocho, R. Belvis, M. Castellanos, J. Montaner, J. Pagonabarraga, A. Aleu, L. Molina-Porcel, J. Diaz-Manera, et al. Hemostatic markers of recanalization in patients with ischemic stroke treated with rt-PA Neurology, August 9, 2005; 65(3): 366 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. O. Zaidat, J. I. Suarez, J. L. Sunshine, R. W. Tarr, M. J. Alexander, T. P. Smith, D. S. Enterline, W. R. Selman, and D. M. D. Landis Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Correlation of Angiographic Recanalization with Clinical Outcome AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 880 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Kim, Z. Garami, R. Mikulik, C. A. Molina, A. V. Alexandrov, and for the CLOTBUST Collaborators Early Recanalization Rates and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Tandem Internal Carotid Artery/Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion and Isolated Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 869 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Noser, H. M. Shaltoni, C. E. Hall, A. V. Alexandrov, Z. Garami, E. D. Cacayorin, J. K. Song, J. C. Grotta, and M. S. Campbell III Aggressive Mechanical Clot Disruption: A Safe Adjunct to Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke? Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 292 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saposnik, B. Young, B. Silver, S. Di Legge, F. Webster, V. Beletsky, V. Jain, Y. Nilanont, and V. Hachinski Lack of Improvement in Patients With Acute Stroke After Treatment With Thrombolytic Therapy: Predictors and Association With Outcome JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1839 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgiadis, J. Oehler, S. Schwarz, V. Rousson, M. Hartmann, and S. Schwab Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome? Neurology, July 13, 2004; 63(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Seidel, K. Meyer-Wiethe, G. Berdien, D. Hollstein, D. Toth, and T. Aach Ultrasound Perfusion Imaging in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Predicts Outcome Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): 1107 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, J. Montaner, J. F. Arenillas, M. Ribo, M. Rubiera, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Differential Pattern of Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Induced Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery Recanalization Among Stroke Subtypes Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 486 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Brown, K. C. Johnston, D. P. Wagner, and E. C. Haley Jr Predicting Major Neurological Improvement With Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment of Stroke Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 147 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, A. V. Alexandrov, A. M. Demchuk, M. Saqqur, K. Uchino, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Recanalization on Stroke Outcome in Patients Treated With Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 151 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |