| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:1640.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Tokyo Womens Medical University (H.O., H.K., T.Y., T.H.), and Division of Genetic Diagnosis, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo (T.N., I.I.), Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Ituro Inoue, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Genetic Diagnosis, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Shirokanedai 4-6-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan. E-mail ituro{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods The sample for the linkage study comprised 179 individuals with IA in 85 nuclear families, with 104 possible affected sibpairs. For the association study of the 6bINS polymorphism and 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ENG, 172 Japanese patients with IA and 192 control subjects were examined.
Results There was no evidence of linkage in the vicinity of ENG by analysis of affected sibpairs. The allele frequency of the 6bINS polymorphism was 104 of 344 (30.2%) in the total IA group and 122 of 382 (31.9%) in the control group. The statistical difference in allele frequency between the 2 groups was not significant (
2=0.245, df=1, P=0.620). The power of the present association study was 98.3% at a significance level of 0.05 on the basis of the allele frequencies in the previous study. In addition, no associations between the 4 SNPs in ENG and IA were detected.
Conclusions We provide evidence that there is no association between the 6bINS polymorphism or 4 SNPs in ENG and IA and that there is no linkage between the ENG locus and IA, indicating that ENG is not a major susceptibility gene for IA in Japanese.
Key Words: association genes intracranial aneurysm linkage (genetics)
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a recent study by Takenaka and colleagues,6 a 6-base insertion (6bINS) in intron 7 of the endoglin gene (ENG [MIM131195]) was reported to be genetically associated with IA in a Japanese population. In addition, Krex et al7 reported that although 6bINS was not significantly associated with IA in a white population, there were ethnicity-related differences in allele frequencies between white and Japanese control subjects. We have carefully tested for allelic associations between 6bINS and 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in ENG with IA in 172 affected individuals; we also tested for linkage between chromosome 9, which contains ENG, and the disease in 104 affected sibpairs. We found that there is no discernible association in the Japanese population.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Genotyping
Microsatellite alleles were determined by a fluorescence-based technique on a DNA Sequencer, model 377 (Applied Biosystems). The microsatellite alleles were assigned by GENESCAN and GENOTYPER software (Applied Biosystems).
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral whole blood with a Genomix kit (TALENT, Trieste) according to the suppliers manual. Then, 5 to 10 ng genomic DNA was amplified in a total of 6 µL reaction mixture containing 1x AmpliTaq Gold Buffer (Applied Biosystems), 300 nM of each primer, 200 nM dNTP mix, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.2 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were as follows. Initial denaturation was at 95°C for 12 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 15 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds, and was completed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes with a thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System, model 9700, Applied Biosystems).
Twenty microsatellite markers spanning chromosome 9 were used for the linkage analysis. Of the 20 markers, 17 included in Linkage Mapping Set version 2 (Applied Biosystems) were used as described before.5 The other 3 markers (D9S265, D9S1678, D9S166) obtained from online information (http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu) were added to the original set to fill in gaps >20 cM.9 The average interval between neighboring markers was 8.1 cM; the maximum interval, between D9S175 and D9S167, was 13.6 cM. The average heterozygosity of the 20 markers was 0.744 in 64 unrelated healthy Japanese.
PCR amplification was performed for genotyping of the 6bINS polymorphism in intron 7 of ENG with the following primers: 6FAM (6-carboxy-fluorescein) labeled 5'-GAGGCCTGGCATAACCCT-3' and 5'-GTTTCTTGTGGCCACTGATCCAAGG-3'. By placing the GTTTCTT sequence on the 5' end of the primer, the PCR product resulted in nearly 100% adenylation at the 3' end of the antistrand, which facilitates accurate genotyping.10
Verification and Genotyping of SNPs in ENG
Direct sequencing was performed with a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing FS Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems) on PCR-amplified segments. Fifteen SNPs in ENG had been previously registered on the NCBI SNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP). Of the 15 SNPs, 4 had allele frequencies >5% and were not in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with each other. The 4 SNPs were genotyped in 192 control subjects and 172 IA patients by direct sequencing, and allele frequencies were compared between groups. Sequences of primers used in this study and PCR conditions are shown in Table 2.
|
Statistical Analysis and Calculation
Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis was performed by a maximum-likelihood method implemented in the GENEHUNTER program.11 Maximum limit of detection score was calculated by the method of possible triangle constrains. All sibpairs from sibships containing >2 affected individuals were counted, and the unweighted option was used.
Genotype and allele frequencies were compared between groups, and allelic association with IA was evaluated by
2 test statistic. The power of the present analysis was calculated as follows12: n=2nIAnC/(nIA+nC), where nIA and nC are the number of alleles tested in patients with IA and control subjects, respectively; h=
IA-
C,
IA=2 arcsin (pIA1/2) and
C=2 arcsin (pC1/2), where pIA and pC are the frequency of alleles with 6bINS in patients with IA and control subjectss, respectively; Z1-ß=h(n/2)1/2-Z1-
(formula 1), where
and ß are type I and II errors, respectively; and the quantity of Z1-ß gives the probability of normal distribution with zero mean.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 cM from the petit-arm-terminal end (pter) of chromosome 9. Although there was marginal evidence of linkage near the marker of D9S288 (maximum limit of detection score, 1.19), located 8.8 cM from pter, we could not find any evidence for linkage in the vicinity of ENG (Figure 1).
|
Association Study With SNPs in ENG
Sequencing in Japanese subjects revealed 5 SNPs, registered on the GenBank database as rs1998923, rs2417056, rs1800956, rs1330683, and rs1330684, to have relatively high allele frequencies. Evaluation of degrees of pairwise LD between combinations of the 5 SNPs indicated that 4 SNPs were not in LD with each other. Because allele frequencies of SNPs in strong degrees of pairwise LD show similar consequences in general, these 4 SNPs were selected for association studies. The 4 SNPs are located in intron 1, 2, and 11 and exon 8 of ENG and are designated INT1 (rs1998923), INT2 (rs2417056), INT11 (rs1330683), and EX8 (rs1800956), respectively (Figure 2). Allele frequencies of the 4 SNPs were compared in 192 control subjects versus 172 total IAs or 87 familial IAs (Table 3). Although a weak allelic frequency difference between total IAs and control subjects was detected for INT1 (
2=4.022, df=1, P=0.045), the statistical differences of the other 3 SNPs in allele frequency between total IAs and control subjects were not significant (INT2:
2=1.129, df=1, P=0.288; EX8:
2=0.902, df=1, P=0.342; INT11:
2=0.342, df=1, P=0.559). Similar results in allele frequencies between control subjects and familial IAs were observed for the 4 SNPs.
|
|
Association Study for Replication
The genotype frequency of the 6bINS polymorphism was compared between IAs and control subjects (Table 4). We detected the homozygous and heterozygous insertion in 12.8% and 34.9% of total IAs and in 13.1% and 37.7% of control subjects, respectively. Distributions of the genotype frequency in all groups were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Statistical differences in genotype frequency between the total IAs and control subjects (
2=0.376, df=2, P=0.829) and even between familial IAs and control subjects (
2=0.553, df=2, P=0.758) were not significant. The allele frequency of 6bINS was 104 of 344 total IAs (30.2%), 58 of 174 familial IAs (33.3%), and 122 of 382 control subjects (31.9%). Differences in allele frequency between total IAs and control subjects (
2=0.245, df=1, P=0.620) and between familial IAs and controls (
2=0.106, df=1, P=0.744) were not significant.
|
Power Calculation
The power required in the present study to detect a specified difference in the frequency of the 6bINS allele (Table 5) was calculated as follows. Let pIA=0.408 and pC=0.276 be the frequency of the 6bINS allele in patients with IA and control subjects, respectively, as illustrated in the study of Takenaka et al.6 The numbers of alleles tested in the present study were nIA=344 and nC=382 in patients with IA and control subjects, respectively. We computed as follows:
IA=2 arcsin (0.4081/2)=1.387,
C=2 arcsin (0.2761/2)=1.107, h=
IA-
C=0.280, n=2x344x382/(344+382)=362, (n/2)1/2=13.45. To calculate power at a significance level of
=0.05, Z1-
was obtained from a table of the normal distribution: Z1-
=1.65. Using formula 1 presented previously, we obtained Z1-ß=2.12. This gives the value of t to be referred to the table of normal distribution to obtain the power 1-ß=0.983.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Association-based methods in which the joint distribution of phenotypes and genotypes in a population are examined may well be more powerful than linkage-based approaches for the identification of the genes (loci) underlying common diseases.19 However, evidence from association studies must be considered with caution, especially because of ascertainment bias and population stratification. When the allelic association evidence of Takenaka et al6 is evaluated, 2 types of error, type I (
) and type II (ß), must be considered. Type I error occurs when a significant difference on the basis of sample estimates does not actually appear in the whole population. Type II error occurs when a difference cannot be detected in a sample of the population although the difference appears in the whole population. Accordingly, type II error becomes the dominant concern if the test statistic does not reach significance. Type II error complement 1-ß, or "power," is defined as the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis (H0: a genetic marker occurs at equal frequency in cases and controls) when it is false.12 With our sample size, the power of the present study was 98.3% at a significance level of 0.05 on the basis of the allele frequencies in the study of Takenaka et al.6 Strictly speaking, the Takenaka et al study achieved a significance level of 0.006, so negative evidence might require a power of 99.4%. However, because of the greater sample size, this difference in power should be a very small factor.
Although the positive association between IA and ENG observed by Takenaka et al6 was not found in our sample, our data are not incompatible with the role of some ENG polymorphisms in susceptibility to some types of IA. However, the present study clearly shows that there is no association between the 6bINS polymorphism of ENG and IA or between 4 SNPs in ENG and IA and that ENG is not a major susceptibility gene for IA among Japanese.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 1, 2002; revision received January 3, 2003; accepted January 30, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Longstreth WT Jr, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical course of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a population-based study in King County, Washington. Neurology. 1993; 43: 712718.
3. Inagawa T, Tokuda Y, Ohbayashi N, Takaya M, Moritake K. Study of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Izumo City, Japan. Stroke. 1995; 26: 761766.
4. Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF, Parisi JE, Piepgras DG, Whisnant JP. Sudden death from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 1995; 45: 871874.
5. Onda H, Kasuya H, Yoneyama T, Takakura K, Hori T, Takeda J, Nakajima T, Inoue I. Genomewide-linkage and haplotype-association studies map intracranial aneurysm to chromosome 7q11. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 69: 804819.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Takenaka K, Sakai H, Yamakawa H, Yoshimura S, Kumagai M, Yamakawa H, Nakashima S, Nozawa Y, Sakai N. Polymorphism of the endoglin gene in patients with intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90: 935938.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Krex D, Ziegler A, Schackert HK, Schackert G. Lack of association between endoglin intron 7 insertion polymorphism and intracranial aneurysms in a white population: evidence of racial/ethnic differences. Stroke. 2001; 32: 26892694.
8. Kasuya H, Onda H, Takeshita M, Hori T, Takakura K. Clinical features of intracranial aneurysms in siblings. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46: 13011305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ikari K, Onda H, Furushima K, Maeda S, Harata S, Takeda J. Establishment of an optimized set of 406 microsatellite markers covering the whole genome for the Japanese population. J Hum Genet. 2001; 46: 207210.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques. 1996; 20: 10041010.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 58: 13471363.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1988.
13. Gougos A, Letarte M. Primary structure of endoglin, an RGD-containing glycoprotein of human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265: 83618364.
14. Cheifetz S, Bellon T, Cales C, Vera S, Bernabeu C, Massague J, Letarte M. Endoglin is a component of the transforming growth factor-beta receptor system in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 1902719030.
15. Li DY, Sorensen LK, Brooke BS, Urness LD, Davis EC, Taylor DG, Boak BB, Wendel DP. Defective angiogenesis in mice lacking endoglin. Science. 1999; 284: 15341537.
16. McAllister KA, Grogg KM, Johnson DW, Gallione CJ, Baldwin MA, Jackson CE, Helmbold EA, Markel DS, McKinnon WC, Murrell J, et al. Endoglin, a TGF-ß binding protein of endothelial cells, is the gene for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1. Nat Genet. 1994; 8: 345351.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Shovlin CL, Hughes JM, Scott J, Seidman CE, Seidman JG. Characterization of endoglin and identification of novel mutations in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 61: 6879.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Pece N, Vera S, Cymerman U, White RI Jr, Wrana JL, Letarte M. Mutant endoglin in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1 is transiently expressed intracellularly and is not a dominant negative. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 25682579.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996; 273: 15161517.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Santiago-Sim, S. Mathew-Joseph, H. Pannu, D. M. Milewicz, C. E. Seidman, J.G. Seidman, and D. H. Kim Sequencing of TGF-{beta} Pathway Genes in Familial Cases of Intracranial Aneurysm Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1604 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Chu and D. G. Peters Serial analysis of the vascular endothelial transcriptome under static and shear stress conditions Physiol Genomics, July 1, 2008; 34(2): 185 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akagawa, A. Tajima, Y. Sakamoto, B. Krischek, T. Yoneyama, H. Kasuya, H. Onda, T. Hori, M. Kubota, T. Machida, et al. A haplotype spanning two genes, ELN and LIMK1, decreases their transcripts and confers susceptibility to intracranial aneurysms Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2006; 15(10): 1722 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Arnold, C. Grond-Ginsbach, I. Hausser, T. Brandt, B. Krischek, I. Inoue, and H. Kasuya Collagen Morphology Is Not Associated With the Ala549Pro Polymorphism of the COL1A2 Gene * Response: Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2068 - 2069. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeed, A. Slowik, A. Borratynska, T. Dziedzic, A. Szczudlik, A. Kieltyka, and D. A. Figlewicz ACE and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Strategies for Genetics of Stroke * Response: Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2752 - 2753. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ribourtout and J. Raymond Gene Therapy and Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 786 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Macdonald Advances in Vascular Surgery Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 375 - 380. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |