(Stroke. 2003;34:1736.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Outcomes Research Institute (A.G.D., A.W., C.-M.L., Y.M.S., D.I.S.), Department of Anesthesiology (A.G.D., A.W., C.-M.L., Y.M.S., D.I.S.), and School of Medicine (K.H.), University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky; Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (C.M.L.), Taipei, Taiwan; and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (D.I.S.).
Correspondence to Dr A.G. Doufas, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville Hospital, 530 S Jackson St, Louisville, KY 40202. E-mail agdoufas{at}louisville.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We studied 8 healthy male volunteers (18 to 40 years of age) on 3 days: (1) control (no warming), (2) arm warming with forced air at
43°C, and (3) face warming with 21 L/min of air at
42°C at a relative humidity of 100%. Fluid at
4°C was infused via a central venous catheter to decrease tympanic membrane temperature 1°C/h to 2°C/h; mean skin temperature was maintained at 31°C. A sustained increase in oxygen consumption quantified the shivering threshold.
Results Shivering thresholds did not differ significantly between the control (36.7±0.1°C), arm-warming (36.5±0.3°C), or face-warming (36.5±0.3°C; analysis of variance, P=0.34) day. The study was powered to have a 95% probability of detecting a difference of 0.5±0.5°C (mean±SD) between control and either of the 2 treatments at
=0.05.
Conclusions Focal arm or face warming did not substantially reduce the shivering threshold in unanesthetized volunteers. It thus seems unlikely that these nonpharmacological modalities will substantially facilitate induction of therapeutic hypothermia.
Key Words: body temperature regulation shivering
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction of hypothermia during surgery is relatively easy because anesthetics profoundly impair thermoregulatory responses.6 However, use of therapeutic hypothermia in stroke patients may be compromised because tiny reductions in core temperature trigger aggressive thermoregulatory defenses,7 even in stroke victims.8 Shivering is the most powerful autonomic cold defense in humans.9 This has led to a search for treatments that impair shivering without causing excessive toxicity. Many drugs inhibit shivering, but most are general anesthetics10,11 or major sedatives.12 For example, the combination of buspirone and meperidine significantly reduces the shivering threshold (triggering core temperature)13; however, meperidine doses sufficient to reduce core temperature to
33°C may be associated with respiratory toxicity.
An alternative to pharmacological treatment of shivering is surface warming. For example, Sweney et al14 recently reported that focal hand warming suppresses shivering in mildly hypothermic volunteers. The same group also reported that shivering can be suppressed by warming of the lower face, combined with inhalation of heated and humidified air.15 Others have also reported that facial warming reduces shivering,16 as does radiant heating of the face and upper chest.1719
The difficulty with these observations is that treatments reducing the shivering threshold only a couple tenths of a degree centigrade may be sufficient to attenuate shivering. Treatments that only slightly reduce the shivering threshold20,21 may appear to be effective in volunteers or postoperative patients22,23 but may be completely inadequate for induction of therapeutic hypothermia. Skin temperature contributes
20% to autonomic control of shivering, with the remainder being derived from core temperature.24,25 However, the arms and face are a small portion of the total skin surface. It thus seems unlikely that manipulating hand or facial skin temperature alone would impair thermoregulatory responses sufficiently to permit induction of therapeutic hypothermia. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that focal arm warming or lower facial warming, combined with inhalation of heated and humidified gas, only minimally reduces the shivering threshold.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol
The volunteers fasted 8 hours before each study day. They were minimally clothed and rested supine on a standard operating room table. Ambient temperature was maintained at
22°C. Each volunteer was studied on 3 days: (1) control (no warming), (2) lower-arm warming (forearm and hand), and (3) face warming. Each study day was separated by at least 48 hours.
The arm warming apparatus consisted of 2 forced-air warming units (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical, Inc) set to high (
43°C), each attached to an upper-body coverlet that was wrapped into a muff surrounding each forearm and hand. Face warming was achieved by injection of 21 L/min air at
42°C at a relative humidity of 100% into a continuous positive airway pressure mask, which was tightly fitted around the volunteers face (Respironics). Air was warmed and humidified with a Vapotherm (Vapotherm, Inc).
A central catheter was introduced into the superior vena cava via an antecubital vein and used for cold-fluid infusion. Throughout the study period, mean skin temperature was maintained at 31°C, excluding the warming sites, by adjusting the temperature of circulating-water (Cincinnati Sub-Zero) and forced-air warmers. Furthermore, the back, upper body, and lower body were individually maintained at the designated skin temperature. On each day of the experiment, core cooling started 20 minutes after arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction was documented (defined below).
Lactated Ringers solution, cooled to
4°C, was infused at rates sufficient to decrease tympanic membrane temperature 1°C/h to 2°C/h because these rates are not associated with induction of dynamic thermoregulatory responses.7 Fluid was given until the shivering threshold was identified.
Measurements
Heart rate was measured continuously with an ECG; blood pressure was determined oscillometrically at 5-minute intervals at the left ankle. A pulse oximeter continuously determined arterial oxygen saturation.
All temperatures were recorded with Mon-a-therm thermocouples (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, Inc). Core temperature was recorded from the tympanic membrane. Volunteers inserted the aural probe until they felt the thermocouple touch the tympanic membrane; appropriate placement was confirmed when volunteers easily detected gentle rubbing of the attached wire. The aural canal was occluded with cotton; the probe was securely taped in place; and a gauze bandage was positioned over the external ear.
Mean skin surface temperature was determined from 15 area-weighted sites.26,27 On the arm-warming day, lower-arm and hand temperatures were excluded from the calculation of mean skin temperature; similarly, facial temperature was excluded from the calculation of mean skin temperature on the face-warming day. Air temperature inside the mask was measured by a thermocouple hanging freely within the mask space, whereas facial skin temperature was measured by a thermocouple attached to the volunteers cheek.
Temperatures were recorded from thermocouples connected to calibrated Iso-Thermex 16-channel electronic thermometers having an accuracy of 0.1°C and a precision of 0.01°C (Columbus Instruments International, Corp). Individual and mean skin temperatures were computed by a data acquisition system, displayed at 1-second intervals, and recorded at 1-minute intervals.
Arteriovenous shunt vasomotor tone was evaluated with forearm-minus-fingertip and calf-minus-toe skin temperature gradients. There is excellent correlation between skin temperature gradients and volume plethysmography.28 Vasoconstriction was defined by a forearm-fingertip skin temperature gradient >0°C.
Shivering was quantified by oxygen consumption measured by a DeltaTrac (SensorMedics Corp) metabolic monitor; the system was used in canopy mode.29 Measurements were averaged over 1-minute intervals and recorded every minute. End-tidal PCO2 was measured with an Ultima monitor (Datex), and exhaust gases from this monitor were returned to the oxygen consumption monitor.
Data Analysis
On each study day, hemodynamic, respiratory, ambient temperature, and relative humidity data were averaged for each volunteer across the cooling period; these values were then averaged for all volunteers. A sustained increase in oxygen consumption (O2) of
30%, as determined by a blinded investigator, identified the shivering threshold. The baseline for this analysis was the steady-state value (
5% variation in O2) before core cooling had started.
Results on the 3 study days were compared by use of repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnetts posthoc tests. Results are expressed as mean±SD; differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ambient temperature, relative humidity, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, average end-tidal PCO2, and SpO2 were similar on each study day (Table 1). Mean skin temperature was maintained at
31°°C. Per protocol, all volunteers were vasoconstricted before the cold-fluid infusion started. Air temperature inside the continuous positive airway pressure mask on the face-warming day averaged 38.6±1.4°C (Table 2).
|
|
Arm warming reduced the shivering threshold by 0.2±0.3°C, from 36.7±0.1°C to 36.5±0.3°C. Face warming reduced the shivering threshold by 0.1±0.3°C, from 36.7±0.1°C to 36.5±0.3°C (the Figure). The value for ANOVA across all 3 treatments was P=0.34, so posthoc comparisons were not undertaken. This study achieved a 95% power to detect a 0.5°C difference between the control threshold and either of the treatment thresholds at
=0.05.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arm or face warming reduced shivering thresholds by only
0.2°C. Neither of these decreases was statistically significant (although we had 95% power to detect 0.5°C changes), and neither decrease was clinically important. Our data thus fail to support the proposal of Iaizzo et al15 that "this cooling paradigm holds promise as a means for the induction of mild hypothermia which may enhance cerebral protection in individuals at risk of brain injury."
The theory behind using cutaneous warming to treat shivering is that both skin and core temperatures contribute to control of thermoregulatory responses. Warming the skin surface reduces the core temperature that triggers shivering. However, skin temperature contributes only 20% to steady-state control of shivering.24,25 Furthermore, the extremities are relatively insensitive to thermal manipulation.31,32 Hand temperature was not reported by Sweney et al,14 but they also used a Bair Hugger forced-air warmer as the heat source. Thus, hand temperature in the 2 studies was presumably similar. However, we warmed both the hands and forearms rather than the hands alone. The forearm and hands constitute
10% of the total skin surface area and were warmed 6°C. We would thus expect that hand warming would reduce the shivering threshold only
0.1°C, which is entirely consistent with our results.
Thermal sensitivity of the upper chest and face is greater than that of the remaining skin surface.31,32 Furthermore, there are substantial regional differences within the face.33 We warmed the face and airway by injecting 21 L/min air at
42°C at a relative humidity of 100% into a tightly fitted mask. This increased facial temperature by 2.6°C. In contrast, Iaizzo et al15 used air at 32°C with 55% humidity and failed to report facial skin temperature. The difficulty with using facial warming to ablate shivering is that the surface area of the face is tiny, perhaps only 4.5% of the total skin area. It thus seems unlikely that facial warming alone would markedly reduce the shivering threshold. The extent to which oropharyngeal and airway thermal receptors contribute to control of shivering remains unknown. However, our results do not suggest that warming facial skin and airway receptors produces clinically important inhibition of shivering.
A critical difference between our study and previous similar ones14,15 is that we quantified the shivering threshold rather than simply observing a short-term reduction in shivering intensity. Thus, although Sweney et al14 and Iaizzo et al15 found that acute application of hand or face warming reduced shivering in nearly normothermic volunteers, we observed only trivial reductions in the steady-state shivering threshold. The most likely explanation is that unlike sustained warming, rapid increases in skin temperature provoke powerful dynamic responses.34 Thermoregulatory response thresholds35,36 and thermal sensation3739 depend not only on static temperatures but also on the rate at which temperatures change. For example, rapid changes in skin temperature markedly augment cutaneous contribution to the sweating threshold35,36 and improve thermal sensation during hyperthermia.38 The magnitude of dynamic thermoregulatory response to facial warming remains unknown but may be even greater than for the skin surface as a whole.
Rapid increases in skin temperature ameliorate shivering.1719 A brief reduction in shivering intensity might well facilitate performing a neurological examination, as proposed by Sweney et al.14 Nonetheless, therapeutic hypothermia must be maintained for hours or days and thus represents a thermal steady state. Therefore, the steady-state conditions of our study may best represent the typical clinical situation. Our results suggest that neither lower-arm nor face warming will prevent shivering over the period needed for therapeutic hypothermia.
Our volunteers were much younger and healthier than stroke victims, and temperature sensitivity is linearly dependent on age,40 with older people having a reduced cutaneous thermal sensitivity and a reduced thermal perception during cooling.32,41 Furthermore, the shivering threshold is reduced a full degree centigrade in the elderly.42 Inducing tolerance to therapeutic hypothermia is thus likely to be easier in elderly stroke victims than in young volunteers. Nonetheless, our results suggest that cutaneous warming alone will be insufficient and that pharmacological intervention13 will be required.
Because skin temperature contributes 20% to control of vasoconstriction and shivering,24 each 1°C decrease in mean skin temperature increases the shivering threshold
0.2°C. Mean skin temperature was kept constant at a low value throughout our study to increase the threshold, thereby minimizing risk from infusion of large amounts of cold fluid.
A limitation of our study is the use of tympanic membrane temperature as an indicator of core body temperature during face warming. Previous work suggests that tympanic membrane temperatures can be artifactually elevated during head43,44 or facial15,45,46 skin warming. However, the observed differences between tympanic and esophageal temperatures were tiny. Even small inaccuracies in our temperature measurements would not obviate our major finding that physical warming fails to induce useful amounts of thermoregulatory tolerance.
In summary, we found that neither lower-arm nor facial warming substantially reduces the shivering threshold in unanesthetized volunteers. It thus seems unlikely that either nonpharmacological intervention will contribute meaningfully to induction of therapeutic hypothermia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 11, 2002; revision received January 29, 2003; accepted February 5, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Komatsu, M. Orhan-Sungur, J. In, T. Podranski, T. Bouillon, R. Lauber, S. Rohrbach, and D. Sessler Ondansetron does not reduce the shivering threshold in healthy volunteers Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wadhwa, P. Sengupta, J. Durrani, O. Akca, R. Lenhardt, D. I. Sessler, and A. G. Doufas Magnesium sulphate only slightly reduces the shivering threshold in humans Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 756 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |