Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:1790-1795
Published online before print June 12, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000077016.55891.2E
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/7/1790    most recent
01.STR.0000077016.55891.2Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chopp, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chopp, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Fibrinolysis
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Thrombolysis

(Stroke. 2003;34:1790.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Effects of a Selective CD11b/CD18 Antagonist and Recombinant Human Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment Alone and in Combination in a Rat Embolic Model of Stroke

Li Zhang, MD; Zheng Gang Zhang, MD, PhD; Rui Lan Zhang, MD; Mei Lu, PhD; Michael Krams, PhD Michael Chopp, PhD

From the Departments of Neurology (L.Z., Z.G.Z., R.L.Z., M.C.) and Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology (M.L.), Henry Ford Health Sciences Center, Detroit, Mich; Pfizer ClinSci CNS, Groton, Conn (M.K.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Mich (M.C.).

Correspondence to Michael Chopp, PhD, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202. E-mail chopp{at}neuro.hfh.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— We evaluated the neuroprotective effect of UK-279,276 (also referred to as recombinant neutrophil inhibitory factor), a selective CD11b/CD18 antagonist, in combination with thrombolytic therapy on focal cerebral ischemia.

Methods— Male Wistar rats (n=88) were subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion. Animals were randomly assigned to the following groups (n=11 in each group): vehicle treatment alone at 2 or 4 hours, UK-279,276 treatment alone at 2 or 4 hours, recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator (rhtPA) treatment alone at 2 or 4 hours, or the combination of UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 2 or 4 hours. Infarct volume, neurological function, hemorrhagic transformation, neutrophil accumulation, and parenchymal fibrin deposition were measured 7 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Results— Treatment with UK-279,276 significantly (P<0.05) improved neurological severity scores, an index of neurological functional deficit, but had no effect on infarct volume compared with vehicle-treated animals. Treatment with rhtPA alone at 2 but not 4 hours significantly (P<0.05) reduced infarct volume and improved neurological function compared with vehicle-treated animals. Combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 2 or 4 hours significantly (P<0.01) reduced infarct volume and enhanced recovery of neurological function compared with control. Neutrophil accumulation and fibrin deposition in the brain parenchyma of combination-treated rats at 2 and 4 hours after stroke were significantly reduced (P<0.05) compared with corresponding vehicle-treated control groups. The neuroprotective effect of the combined treatments was superior to the additive effects from each treatment of rhtPA or UK-279,276 alone.

Conclusions— These data suggest that the combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA may extend the window of thrombolytic therapy for the acute treatment of stroke.


Key Words: neuroprotection • reperfusion injury • stroke • tissue plasminogen activator • rats


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Administration of recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator (rhtPA) within 3 hours of the onset of stroke is beneficial for patients with ischemic stroke.1–3 However, thrombolysis with rhtPA beyond the 3-hour therapeutic window fails to provide therapeutic benefit and increases hemorrhagic transformation.1 Preclinical data suggest that reperfusion initiated by delayed thrombolysis can precipitate further cerebral injury.4–6

Neutrophils exacerbate reperfusion injury after ischemic insult.7,8 Neutrophil adhesion and migration after stroke are mediated by interaction of CD11b/CD18 ß2 integrins on neutrophils with intercellular adhesion molecules expressed on the vascular endothelial cell surface.9 Treatment with antibodies against CD11b/CD18 or intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) reduces parenchymal neutrophil accumulation and infarct volume in experimental transient focal cerebral ischemia.10,11 However, inhibition of neutrophil adhesion and migration does not reduce infarct volume in permanent experimental stroke and does not show clinical benefit for stroke patients.12

UK-279,276 (also referred to as recombinant neutrophil inhibitory factor [rNIF]) is a glycoprotein isolated from the canine hookworm.13 This 41-kd protein specifically binds to the I-domain CD11b/CD18 ß2 integrin and thereby inhibits neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium and the subsequent release of hydrogen peroxide.13 UK-279,276 potently inhibits human neutrophil function in vitro.13,14 Moreover, treatment of rats subjected to transient middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion with UK-279,276 significantly reduces infarct volume and neutrophil infiltration.15

Delayed thrombolytic therapy with rhtPA significantly increases adhesion molecule expression and exacerbates cerebral injury after focal cerebral ischemia,16 whereas treatment with rhtPA in combination with antiadhesion molecules that inhibit neutrophil adhesion and migration extends the therapeutic window of thrombolysis.6,17 These data suggest that adjunctive thrombolysis with inhibition of neutrophil adhesion has a synergistic effect on thrombolytic therapy. In the present study we evaluated the neuroprotective efficacy of UK-279,276 in combination with delayed thrombolysis with rhtPA in a model of embolic focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Our data indicate that coadministration of UK-279,276 and rhtPA extends the therapeutic window of thrombolysis and that the therapeutic benefit is superadditive.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
All experimental procedures were approved by the Care of Experimental Animals Committee of Henry Ford Hospital. All measurements were performed blindly.

Animals
Male Wistar rats (n=88) weighing 320 to 400 g were used in the experiments.

Embolic Model of Stroke
The MCA was occluded by placement of a single fibrin-rich clot at the origin of the MCA.18

Experimental Protocols
UK-279,276 (Pfizer) was intravenously injected as a bolus dose of 3.2 mg/kg over a 2-minute period through the externalized femoral vein catheter, which was followed by infusion at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg for 7 days with a Harvard pump (Harvard Apparatus). The animals were allowed complete freedom of movement and access to food while maintaining the infusion.15 rhtPA (Genentech) was infused intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg as a 10% bolus, and the remainder was infused continuously over a 30-minute interval with a Harvard pump (Harvard Apparatus). After embolization, animals were randomly divided into the following 8 groups. (1) To examine the effect of UK-279,276 alone on ischemia, UK-279,276 and rhtPA vehicle were administered to ischemic rats at 2 (n=11) or 4 hours (n=11) after MCA occlusion. (2) To examine the effect of rhtPA alone on ischemia, rhtPA and saline were administered to ischemic rats at 2 (n=11) or 4 hours (n=11) after MCA occlusion. (3) To examine the effect of combination therapy of UK-279,276 and rhtPA on ischemia, UK-279,276 and rhtPA were administered at 2 (n=11) or 4 hours (n=11) after MCA occlusion. Control groups consisted of ischemic rats treated with same volumes of saline and rhtPA vehicle at 2 (n=11) or 4 hours (n=11) after MCA occlusion.

Neurological Severity Scores
The neurological severity scores (NSS) test is a composite of motor, sensory, reflex, and balance tests.19 NSS was measured at 1 hour and again at 7 days after MCA occlusion.

Foot-Fault Test
Rats were tested for placement dysfunction of forelimbs with the modified foot-fault test20 at 1 hour and again at 7 days after MCA occlusion.

Body Weight
Animals were weighed before and 7 days after embolic ischemia. Body weight loss is presented as a percentage of preischemic body weight.

Histopathologic Studies
All the animals were killed 7 days after MCA occlusion.18 Lesion volume, the primary outcome, was measured on the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained coronal sections with the use of a Global Laboratory Image Analysis program (Data Translation).18 The ischemic volume is presented as the percentage of infarct volume of the contralateral hemisphere (indirect volume calculation).18

Measurement of Hemorrhage
Gross hemorrhage, defined as blood evident to the unaided eye on the H&E-stained coronal sections, was evaluated on 7 H&E-stained coronal sections for each animal. The percentage of gross hemorrhage in each experimental group was calculated. Petechial hemorrhage, defined as a cluster of red blood cells outside of the lumen of blood vessels, was measured on 7 H&E-stained coronal sections with the use of a Global Laboratory Image Analysis program. The area of hemorrhage (µm2) was calculated by tracing the areas on the computer screen; the sum of hemorrhage areas from each section was calculated as the total area of hemorrhage.18

Measurement of Myeloperoxidase-Immunoreactive Cells
Inflammatory cells within the brain were measured immunohistochemically.21 A 6-um-thick paraffin-embedded coronal section from the center of the ischemic lesion at the level of the anterior commissure (coordinates: interaural, 8.2 mm; bregma, 0.8 mm) was stained with a polyclonal antibody against human myeloperoxidase (MPO) (1:200 dilution; DAKO) for evaluation of neutrophils. Numbers of MPO-immunoreactive cells were counted throughout the whole hemisphere at x400 magnification. Only morphologically intact MPO-immunoreactive cells were included in the counts. Data are presented as the number of MPO-positive cells relative to the infarct area (mm2).

Measurement of Fibrin Deposition
A coronal section from the center of the ischemic lesion was incubated with an anti-mouse fibrinogen/fibrin antibody at a titer of 1:1000 (Accurate Chemical & Scientific) for 1 hour at room temperature and then with the corresponding secondary antibody for 1 hour.22 Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine. Fibrin deposition in the parenchyma was determined by counting the number of microvessels with fibrin deposition outside the vessel.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SD. We first evaluated normality of each measure of interest. Data transformation and nonparametric approach would be considered if the data were ill behaved. Two-way ANOVA was used to test the overall treatment effects of ordinal data between groups. The interaction between rhtPA and UK-279,276 was tested with the critical level 0.05. If interaction (multiplicative effect) was significant at the 0.05 level, the effect of combination treatment would be further studied for superadditivity (the combined rhtPA and UK-279,276 effect is superior to the combined effect of each treatment alone) or subadditive effect (vice versa). We estimated the coefficient of superadditive/subadditive effect and its 95% CI. The CI excluding zero indicates a superadditive/subadditive effect of the combined rhtPA and UK-279,276 treatment.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Neurological Severity Scores
All rats exhibited severe deficits 1 hour after MCA occlusion. Treatment with rhtPA alone at 2 but not at 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) improved neurological functional recovery (7.0±1.2) 7 days after ischemia compared with the control groups (8.1±1.1). Treatment with UK-279,276 alone at 2 but not 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) improved neurological functional deficit (7.5±1.5) on the NSS test compared with control groups (8.1±1.1). Combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA 2 and 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced neurological functional deficits (6.3±1.3 at 2 hours and 6.3±1.3 at 4 hours) compared with the control groups(8.1±1.1).

Foot-Fault Test
One hour after MCA occlusion, there were no significant differences among the groups on the percentage of foot faults. Treatment with rhtPA alone at 2 but not at 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced the percentage of foot faults (9.1±1.2) 7 days after ischemia compared with the control groups (11.5±1.1). Rats treated with UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 2 or 4 hours had a foot-fault test score (7.3±1.3 at 2 hours or 9.1±1.4 at 4 hours) significantly lower than that of the controls (11.5±1.1) 7 days after MCA occlusion (P<0.01). However, no significant reduction in foot-fault test score was detected in rats treated with UK-279,276 at 2 or 4 hours after ischemia.

Body Weight Loss
Treatment with rhtPA at 2 hours and combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 2 or 4 hours after the onset of ischemia significantly (P<0.05) reduced body weight loss compared with control groups (Figure 1).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Percentage of body weight loss in each group at 7 days after stroke. UV indicates UK-279,276 vehicle; TV, rhtPA vehicle; UK, UK-279,276; and tPA, rhtPA. Values are mean±SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with control group.

Lesion Volume
Administration of rhtPA at 2 but not at 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced lesion volume compared with control groups (Figure 2). Combination treatment with rhtPA and UK-279,276 when given at 2 and 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.01) reduced lesion volume compared with controls (Figure 2).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of UK-279,276 treatment alone and in combination treatment with rhtPA on infarct volume assessed in each group 7 days after MCA occlusion. Abbreviations are as defined in Figure 1. Values are mean±SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with control group.

Hemorrhage
Gross hemorrhage in the ipsilateral lesion was detected in 27% of the 4-hour rhtPA-treated group, 18% in the 4-hour vehicle-treated group, and 9% in the remaining groups, with no differences detected among groups (P>0.58) (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Hemorrhage

MPO-Immunoreactive Cells
Treatment with UK-279,276 alone at 2 but not 4 hours after ischemia significantly reduced the MPO-immunoreactive cells compared with the control group (Figure 3A). However, combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 2 and 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced the density of MPO-immunoreactive cells in the ipsilateral hemisphere compared with the control group (Figure 3A).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Quantitative analysis of MPO-immunoreactive cells (A) and parenchyma fibrin deposition (B) in each group at 7 days after MCA occlusion. Abbreviations are as defined in Figure 1. Values are mean±SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with control group.

Fibrin Deposition
Treatment with rhtPA 2 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.01) reduced numbers of vessels with fibrin leakage in the parenchyma compared with control animals (Figure 3B). In contrast, a significant (P<0.05) increase in the numbers of vessels with fibrin leakage was detected in the 4-hour rhtPA-treated group compared with control groups. Treatment with UK-279,276 alone at 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced the numbers of vessels with fibrin leakage (Figure 3B). Combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA 2 or 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly (P<0.05) reduced the number of vessels with fibrin leakage compared with controls (Figure 3B).

rhtPA and UK-279,276 Interaction
A superadditive effect of combination rhtPA and UK-279,276 treatment at 4 hours was detected on lesion volume (coefficient -13.46; 95% CI, -24.27 to -2.65; P=0.01), percentage of weight loss (coefficient -9.35; 95% CI, -16.29 to -2.63; P=0.01), reduction in foot-fault test score (coefficient -1.65; 95% CI, -2.89 to -0.42; P=0.01), reduction in NSS (coefficient -1.04; 95% CI, -2.09 to 0.01 [however, this effect is marginal with P=0.052]), and numbers of vessels with fibrin leakage (coefficient -8.91; 95% CI, -17.40 to -0.41; P=0.04). No interaction was detected on all the outcomes at the 0.05 level, indicating additive effects of tPA and NIF, except the foot-fault test score at 7 days for the group treated at 2 hours after MCA occlusion. A superadditive effect of combination rhtPA and UK-279,276 treatment at 2 hours was detected on the reduction of foot-fault test score (coefficient -2.31; 95% CI, -3.89 to -0.73; P<0.01) at 7 days after MCA occlusion.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study we demonstrated that administration of UK-279,276 adjuvant to rhtPA at 4 hours after the onset of ischemia significantly reduced infarct volume and improved neurological function without increasing hemorrhagic transformation, whereas treatment with neither UK-279,276 or rhtPA alone at 4 hours after ischemia reduced infarct volume. Furthermore, treatment with UK-279,276 in combination with rhtPA 4 hours after ischemia significantly reduced parenchymal neutrophil accumulation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage in rats. Therefore, our data suggest that inhibition of neutrophil activity with UK-279,276 and concomitant reduction of BBB leakage extends the therapeutic window for thrombolysis.

We and others have demonstrated that treatment with UK-279,276 and other antiadhesion molecule compounds that inhibit neutrophil activity is effective only in a model of transient but not permanent MCA occlusion.12,15,23 In a model of embolic MCA occlusion, intravascular fibrin deposition and platelet aggregation secondary to MCA occlusion result in a progressive impairment of downstream microvascular plasma perfusion during the early stages of MCA occlusion, which resembles permanent ischemia.22 However, spontaneous thrombolysis occurs after embolic MCA occlusion. In parallel with clinical and experimental studies, the present data demonstrated that treatment with rhtPA alone 2 hours after embolic ischemia significantly reduced infarct volume and improved neurological outcome, whereas treatment with rhtPA alone 4 hours after embolic ischemia increased hemorrhagic transformation and exacerbated ischemic cell damage.16 Treatment with UK-279,276 alone at 2 hours after MCA occlusion did not significantly reduce infarct volume. In contrast, combination treatment of rhtPA with UK-279,276 at 4 hours after embolic ischemia significantly reduced infarct volume and improved neurological function deficits without increasing hemorrhagic transformation. Taken together, our result supports the hypothesis that inhibition of neutrophil activity improves ischemic outcome. The failure of a reduction in infarct volume after treatment with UK-279,276 alone may be attributed to the fact that the spontaneous thrombolysis occurs relatively late after embolic stroke at a time when ischemic cell damage is irreversible. In viewing recent failures of clinical trials of neuroprotective drugs and antineutrophil trafficking agents, the present study strongly supports the premise that thrombolysis-effected reperfusion is essential for neuroprotective drug treatment after embolic stroke.12,24

UK279,276 is a foreign glycoprotein that may develop an immune response, as has been demonstrated in the Enlimomab clinical trial.12 However, in blinded, placebo-controlled phase II trials of UK279,276, there was no evidence for the presence of neutralizing antibodies early enough after treatment to interfere with a potential acute treatment effect (M. Krams, PhD, unpublished data, 2002).

Augmented hemorrhagic transformation is related to disruption of the BBB, which is exacerbated by delayed treatment with rhtPA.25 In the present study, using parenchymal fibrin deposition as a marker for disruption of the BBB, we demonstrated that the trend toward increased hemorrhagic transformation was coincident with a significant increase of BBB leakage in rats treated with rhtPA 4 hours after ischemia. Treatment with UK-279,276 at 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly reduced BBB leakage. Moreover, combination of rhtPA with UK-279,276 at 4 hours after the onset of ischemia significantly reduced BBB leakage and did not exacerbate hemorrhagic transformation, suggesting that UK-279,276 protects BBB integrity and consequently reduces hemorrhagic transformation.

Although the present study did not directly investigate pathways by which administration of UK-279,276 in combination with rhtPA reduces infarct volume and hemorrhagic transformation, mechanisms can be deduced from data in the present and previous studies.6 Evidence exists that reperfusion after thrombolysis increases the likelihood of neutrophil-mediated thrombosis in the microvasculature and neutrophil infiltration into the brain parenchyma after stroke, which may contribute to secondary brain damage.16 However, it is not obvious that neutrophils within the parenchyma contribute to ischemic cell damage.12 Administration of rhtPA 4 hours after MCA occlusion significantly increases the expression of I-CAM, E-selectin, and P-selectin, which exacerbate reperfusion injury after stroke.16 The combination of rhtPA with antibodies against ICAM-1 or CD18 enhances the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, which is associated with the reduction of neutrophil–endothelial cell adhesion and parenchyma infiltration when evaluated 48 hours after MCA occlusion.6,26 UK-279,276 is a selective inhibitor of the CD11b/CD18 ß2 integrin, which blocks neutrophil adhesion to endothelium and does not bind to other members of the ß2 integrin subfamily (CD11c and CD11d).27 Consistent with these studies, the present data revealed that combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA significantly reduced neutrophil accumulation assayed by MPO-immunoreactive cells, indicating that inflammatory response limits the efficiency of thrombolytic therapy. Furthermore, neutrophils play a role in the regulation of vascular permeability.28 The engagement of ß2 integrins on neutrophils triggers the release of neutrophil-derived heparin-binding protein and further increases the vascular permeability.28 UK-279,276 selectively binds to CD11b/CD18 ß2 integrins, which may account for reductions of BBB leakage and hemorrhagic transformation observed in the present study.

A battery of neurological functional tests was used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. The degree of functional impairment may reflect ischemic cell damage after stroke.29 In the present study treatment with rhtPA alone at 2 hours or rhtPA in conjunction with UK-279,276 at 4 hours after the onset of ischemia significantly reduced functional impairment measured by NSS and the foot-fault test compared with controls. These results parallel histopathological data that combination treatment enhances neuroprotection. Although a trend of increased hemorrhagic transformation was found among animals treated with rhtPA at 4 hours after the onset of ischemia, this treatment did not significantly exacerbate neurological impairments compared with the control groups. This discrepancy suggests that areas with parenchymal hemorrhage observed in the present study are relatively small compared with hematoma. Our observations are comparable to clinical data from the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II that demonstrate that only parenchymal hemorrhage exceeding 30% of ischemic lesion volume significantly deteriorates prognosis.30 Moreover, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rhtPA trial showed that symptomatic intercerebral hemorrhages increased from 0.6% in untreated stroke patients to 6.4% in rhtPA-treated stroke patients, but stroke patients exhibited functional improvements when rhtPA was given within 3 hours of the onset of stroke.1

Our statistical analysis revealed that the neuroprotective effect of the combined treatments is superior to the additive effects from each treatment of rhtPA or UK-279,276 alone, especially when the single treatment of rhtPA or UK-279,276 did not have a significant effect on infarct volume. The superadditive effects of combined rhtPA and UK-279,276 treatment were manifest as reductions of lesion volume, body weight loss, NSS, and foot-fault test score at 7 days. Our results suggest that UK-279,276 and rhtPA may interact to improve the effectiveness of neutrophil inhibition and thrombolysis. Neutrophils play a role in fibrin formation.31 Under venous flow conditions, neutrophils promote fibrin formation and deposition.31 Thus, the superiority of combination treatment over single treatment may be due to inhibition of neutrophil-mediated fibrin deposition, which enhances the thrombolytic efficacy.

In summary, our study demonstrates that combination treatment with UK-279,276 and rhtPA at 4 hours after ischemia significantly reduces ischemic cell damage and improves neurological function without increasing hemorrhagic transformation. The combination of a selective CD11b/CD18 integrin inhibitor and thrombolytic therapy may extend the therapeutic window for the treatment of stroke without sacrificing safety.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant from Pfizer and in part by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grants PO1 NS23393, RO1 NS33627, and NS 43324 and by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant RO1 HL 64766. The authors thank Qing-e Lu for technical assistance and Deborah Jewell for secretarial support.

Received December 13, 2002; revision received January 27, 2003; accepted February 7, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 1581–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, LeSaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Magagne M, Hennerici M, for the ECASS Study Group. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995; 274: 1017–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Zivin JA. Thrombolytic stroke therapy: past, present, and future. Neurology. 1999; 53: 14–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Jean WC, Spellman SR, Nussbaum ES, Low WC. Reperfusion injury after focal cerebral ischemia: the role of inflammation and the therapeutic horizon. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43: 1382–1396;comment 1396–1397.

5. Hallenbeck JM, Dutka AJ, Tanishima T, Kochanek PM, Kumaroo KK, Thompson CB, Obrenovitch TP, Contreras TJ. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation in brain regions with low blood flow during the early postischemic period. Stroke. 1986; 17: 246–253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Increased therapeutic efficacy with rt-PA and anti-CD18 antibody treatment of stroke in the rat. Neurology. 1999; 52: 273–279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Becker KJ. Inflammation and acute stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 1998; 11: 45–49.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Kochanek PM, Hallenbeck JM. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes/macrophages in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia and stroke. Stroke. 1992; 23: 1367–1379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Springer TA. Traffic signals on endothelium for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995; 57: 827–872.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Zhang ZG, Chopp M, Tang WX, Jiang N, Zhang RL. Postischemic treatment (2–4 h) with anti-CD11b and anti-CD18 monoclonal antibodies are neuroprotective after transient (2 h) focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res. 1995; 698: 79–85.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Zhang RL, Chopp M, Li Y, Zaloga C, Jiang N, Jones ML, Miyasaka M, Ward PA. Anti-ICAM-1 antibody reduces ischemic cell damage after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Neurology. 1994; 44: 1747–1751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Emerich DF, Dean RL III, Bartus RT. The role of leukocytes following cerebral ischemia: pathogenic variable or bystander reaction to emerging infarct? Exp Neurol. 2002; 173: 168–181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Moyle M, Foster DL, McGrath DE, Brown SM, Laroche Y, De Meutter J, Stanssens P, Bogowitz CA, Fried VA, Ely JA, et al. A hookworm glycoprotein that inhibits neutrophil function is a ligand of the integrin CD11b/CD18. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 10008–10015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Muchowski PJ, Zhang L, Chang ER, Soule HR, Plow EF, Moyle M. Functional interaction between the integrin antagonist neutrophil inhibitory factor and the I domain of CD11b/CD18. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 26419–26423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Jiang N, Chopp M, Chahwala S. Neutrophil inhibitory factor treatment of focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res. 1998; 788: 25–34.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Chopp M, Zivin JA. Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator alters adhesion molecule expression in the ischemic rat brain. Stroke. 1999; 30: 624–629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Bowes MP, Rothlein R, Fagan SC, Zivin JA. Monoclonal antibodies preventing leukocyte activation reduce experimental neurologic injury and enhance efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. Neurology. 1995; 45: 815–819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Zhang RL, Chopp M, Zhang ZG, Jiang Q, Ewing JR. A rat model of embolic focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 1997; 766: 83–92.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang Z, Lu D, Lu M, Chopp M. Therapeutic benefit of intravenous administration of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. 2001; 32: 1005–1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hernandez TD, Schallert T. Seizures and recovery from experimental brain damage. Exp Neurol. 1988; 102: 318–324.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Measurement of myeloperoxidase immunoreactive cells in ischemic brain after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Neurosci Res Comm. 1997; 20: 85–91.

22. Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Tsang W, Goussev A, Powers C, Ho K, Morris D, Smyth SS, Coller BS, Chopp M. Dynamic platelet accumulation at the site of the occluded middle cerebral artery and in downstream microvessels is associated with loss of microvascular integrity after embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res. 2001; 912: 181–194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Prestigiacomo CJ, Kim SC, Connolly ES Jr, Liao H, Yan SF, Pinsky DJ. CD18-mediated neutrophil recruitment contributes to the pathogenesis of reperfused but not nonreperfused stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1110–1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Grotta J. Neuroprotection is unlikely to be effective in humans using current trial designs. Stroke. 2002; 33: 306–307.[Free Full Text]

25. del Zoppo GJ, Hallenbeck JM. Advances in the vascular pathophysiology of ischemic stroke. Thromb Res. 2000; 98: 73–81.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Chopp M, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Jiang Q. The clot thickens: thrombolysis and combination therapies. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1999; 73: 67–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Rieu P, Sugimori T, Griffith DL, Arnaout MA. Solvent-accessible residues on the metal ion-dependent adhesion site face of integrin CR3 mediate its binding to the neutrophil inhibitory factor. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 15858–15861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Gautam N, Olofsson AM, Herwald H, Iversen LF, Lundgren-Akerlund E, Hedqvist P, Arfors KE, Flodgaard H, Lindbom L. Heparin-binding protein (HBP/CAP37): a missing link in neutrophil-evoked alteration of vascular permeability. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1123–1127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Hunter AJ, Mackay KB, Rogers DC. To what extent have functional studies of ischaemia in animals been useful in the assessment of potential neuroprotective agents? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1998; 19: 59–66.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Berger C, Fiorelli M, Steiner T, Schabitz WR, Bozzao L, Bluhmki E, Hacke W, von Kummer R. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic? Stroke. 2001; 32: 1330–1335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Goel MS, Diamond SL. Neutrophil enhancement of fibrin deposition under flow through platelet-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 2093–2098.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. I. Savitz
Cosmic Implications of NXY-059
Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3_suppl_1): S115 - S118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
P. Muller, D. A. Berry, A. P. Grieve, and M. Krams
A Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Dose-Finding Trial
Decision Analysis, December 1, 2006; 3(4): 197 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. E. Sughrue, E. S. Connolly Jr, M. Krams, K. R. Lees, W. Hacke, A. P. Grieve, J.-M. Orgogozo, and G. A. Ford
Effectively Bridging the Preclinical/Clinical Gap: The Results of the ASTIN Trial * Response
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): e81 - e82.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Krams, K. R. Lees, W. Hacke, A. P. Grieve, J.-M. Orgogozo, and G. A. Ford
Acute Stroke Therapy by Inhibition of Neutrophils (ASTIN): An Adaptive Dose-Response Study of UK-279,276 in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2543 - 2548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/7/1790    most recent
01.STR.0000077016.55891.2Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chopp, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chopp, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Fibrinolysis
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Thrombolysis