Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:1916-1917
Published online before print July 17, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080940.16070.5B
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/8/1916    most recent
01.STR.0000080940.16070.5Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, J.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, J.V.

(Stroke. 2003;34:1916.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—The Progression of Leukoaraiosis

J.V. Bowler, MD, FRCP, Guest Editor

Department of Neurology, Royal Free Hospital, London, England

Leukoaraiosis (LA), the presence of rarefaction of the white matter originally described on CT1 but now more commonly recognized on MRI, was originally largely ignored as an inconsequential finding seen in association with cerebrovascular disease. More recently, it has become clear that LA impairs cognition.2 When LA is sufficiently prominent to be seen on CT, its associated cognitive impairment is readily detected. When seen only on MRI, a more sensitive technique, more sensitive cognitive tools are needed.3 At least as important is the effect of one cognitive disorder to accelerate another, and LA may causally accelerate the progression of Alzheimer disease, for example.4 LA is therefore not the unimportant phenomenon it was once considered.

LA encompasses a wide range of histological changes ranging from local edema5 to demyelination, loss of axons and oligodendroglia, and mild reactive gliosis without cavitation but does not include frank infarction. The mechanism is not considered to be chronic low perfusion as cerebral blood flow in affected areas lies within normal limits at rest or is modestly decreased in proportion to tissue loss. There is, however, clear evidence of diminished perfusion reserve,6,7 and it is hypothesized that episodic mild ischemia occurs as a result of intermittent changes in cerebral perfusion pressure. The process has been termed "incomplete infarction."8 That extensive areas of LA may be seen without local evidence of completed ischemic events has led to the suggestion that part of the mechanism may be increased blood-brain barrier permeability leading to leakage of serum proteins, which are known to be toxic.9

Its new-found importance means that LA has been investigated to only a limited extent. NASCET has already shown that LA is not associated with carotid stenosis but that it is a risk factor for stroke.10 While NASCET used only CT and did not assess cognition, the data presented in the accompanying article by Streifler et al are invaluable for 2 reasons. The first is the very long follow-up available with a mean of 6.4 years, which is double that of the closest previous data. They have shown that 21% of those without LA at entry developed this during the study and that 31.5% of those with LA at entry deteriorated from this point of view. These data will be of great use in determining sample sizes for future studies of the prevention of progression of LA.

Of at least equal importance are the insights into the etiology of LA that the study provides. These are striking by their relative absence in that the traditional risk factors such as age, hypertension, and diabetes are all identified but are remarkably weak. If traditional vascular risk factors offer only part of the explanation for LA, where might the rest of the explanation be found?

One possible explanation comes simply from the study design. The study was concerned primarily with carotid stenosis and did not look in detail at dysrhythmias or other causes of episodic hypotension, which are one postulated mechanisms by which LA might develop.11 Clearly, if a risk factor was not studied, then its effects cannot be analyzed. Curious in this regard is the previously demonstrated lack of association of carotid stenosis with LA; if episodic hypoperfusion truly was a mechanism by which LA develops, it would be expected that the territory supplied by severely stenosed carotids would be especially vulnerable, and yet this is not the case. This mechanism may therefore be weaker than has been supposed and in any case is certainly not yet proven.

The other insight comes from Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL).12 This is numerically unimportant when set against the total burden of cerebrovascular disease but is important because it shows that specific diseases of small vessels causing progressive occlusion can and do exist. Furthermore, there may well be at least 2 such conditions since an autosomal recessive condition associated with lumbago and alopecia has been described in Japan.13 It is the common experience of practicing neurologists that from time to time they see patients with considerable LA in the absence of much in the way of vascular risk factors. The converse is also true, that patients are seen with extensive risk factors, particularly hypertension, but who have little if any LA. These observations can be tied together by the hypothesis that the ability of patients’ small deep arteries to resist the consequences of hypertension and other risk factors varies; CADASIL is an extreme, but buried within the general non-CADASIL population there may well be other single-gene causes of "fragile" vessels or polygenetic factors producing a continuum of susceptibility. Given that LA predicts lacunar stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia and that it is common, the time is now ripe to look pathologically and genetically at patients with LA (and those with extensive risk factors but no LA) with a view to identifying and ultimately treating 1 or more as yet unrecognized conditions affecting small cerebral arteries.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Hachinski VC, Potter P, Merskey H. Leuko-araiosis. Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 21–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and subjective cognitive dysfunction: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology. 2001; 56: 1539–1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. DeCarli C, Murphy DG, Tranh M, Grady CL, Haxby JV, Gillette JA, et al. The effect of white matter hyperintensity volume on brain structure, cognitive performance, and cerebral metabolism of glucose in 51 healthy adults. Neurology. 1995; 45: 2077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Steingart A, Hachinski VC, Lau C, Fox AJ, Fox H, Lee D, et al. Cognitive and neurologic findings in demented patients with diffuse white matter lucencies on computed tomographic scan (leukoaraiosis). Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 36–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Munoz DG, Hastak SM, Harper B, Lee D, Hachinski VC. Pathologic correlates of increased signals of the centrum ovale on magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 1993; 50: 492–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Markus HS, Lythgoe DJ, Ostegaard L, O’Sullivan M, Williams SC. Reduced cerebral blood flow in white matter in ischaemic leukoaraiosis demonstrated using quantitative exogenous contrast based perfusion MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 69: 48–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. De Reuck J, Decoo D, Hasenbroekx MC, Lamont B, Santens P, Goethals P, et al. Acetazolamide vasoreactivity in vascular dementia: a positron emission tomographic study. Eur Neurol. 1999; 41: 31–36.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Brun A, Englund E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann Neurol. 1986; 19: 253–262.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Akiguchi I, Tomimoto H, Suenaga T, Wakita H, Budka H. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in Binswanger’s disease: an immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1998; 95: 78–84.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Benavente OR, Alamowitch S, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, et al. Prognostic importance of leukoaraiosis in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1651–1655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Raiha I, Tarvonen S, Kurki T, Rajala T, Sourander L. Relationship between vascular factors and white matter low attenuation of the brain. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993; 87: 286–289.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Tournier Lasserve E, Joutel A, Melki J, Weissenbach J, Lathrop GM, Chabriat H, et al. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy maps to chromosome 19q12. Nat Genet. 1993; 3: 256–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Fukutake T, Hirayama K. Familial young-adult-onset arteriosclerotic leukoencephalopathy with alopecia and lumbago without arterial hypertension. Eur Neurol. 1995; 35: 69–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S M C Rasquin, F R J Verhey, R Lousberg, and J Lodder
Cognitive performance after first ever stroke related to progression of vascular brain damage: a 2 year follow up CT scan study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 76(8): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. H. Kuller, W.T. Longstreth Jr, A. M. Arnold, C. Bernick, R. Nick Bryan, N. J. Beauchamp Jr, and for the Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative
White Matter Hyperintensity on Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Predictor of Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1821 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/8/1916    most recent
01.STR.0000080940.16070.5Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, J.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, J.V.