| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:2097.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (C.J.R., S.H., M.R.D., R.R.S.), and the Neurological Institute (R.L.S., J.P.M.), Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Shunichi Homma, MD, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032. E-mail sh23{at}columbia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods As a part of the PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study, transesophageal echocardiography was performed in a cohort of 630 ischemic stroke patients (mean age, 59±12 years; 44% women; 45% whites, 35% blacks, 17% Hispanics, 3% other). The prevalences of PFO, ASA, and right atrial (RA) anatomy favoring paradoxical embolization were compared among race-ethnic groups. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance for continuous variables and logistic regression for dichotomous variables with adjustments for age and sex.
Results Age- and sex-adjusted prevalences of PFO and ASA were similar across race-ethnic subgroups. However, large PFO was significantly less prevalent among blacks than among whites (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.91; P=0.02). RA anatomy favoring paradoxical embolization was also significantly less prevalent among blacks compared with whites (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.91; P=0.01). There were no significant differences in prevalence between whites and Hispanics.
Conclusions Although the frequency of PFO did not vary among race-ethnic groups, a large PFO and RA anatomy favoring paradoxical embolization were significantly more prevalent among whites and Hispanics compared with blacks. These may be relatively more important risk factors for stroke among whites and Hispanics than among blacks.
Key Words: echocardiography epidemiology ethnic groups racial differences stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The epidemiological studies identifying these morphological features as risk factors for cryptogenic stroke have been relatively small and/or not racially heterogeneous.810,13 Thus, whether these transesophageal echocardiography (TE)defined cryptogenic stroke risk factors vary by race-ethnicity remains undefined and may be important in furthering our understanding of the relationship between race-ethnicity and stroke. Assessing the likelihood of a variety of stroke risk factors as a probable cause among different race-ethnic groups is of great importance. Doing so may enable us to target the likely cause for diagnostic treatment and prevention strategies.3,5 In this study, data from the PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) were used to examine the race-ethnic variation of PFO, ASA, and other atrial abnormalities associated with cryptogenic stroke.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Race-Ethnic Classification
Race-ethnic groups were defined by self-identification with the criteria developed by WARSS.14,15 Race was classified as American Indian, Asian or Pacific Islander, black, white, Hispanic, or other. Hispanics were defined as persons of Hispanic/Spanish/Latino origin or descent.
Stroke Subtyping
All baseline strokes were subtyped by a local neurology principal investigator based on predefined criteria modeled after the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Stroke Data Bank and the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Therapy (TOAST).17 Subtypes were lacunar, large vessel, cryptogenic, other determined cause, and conflicting mechanisms.
Analysis of Tapes
The TE protocol emphasized delineation of TE-associated embolic sources, including extensive characterization of PFO. All TE tapes were analyzed by a single observer (S.H.) blinded to stroke subtype or outcome. PFO was determined to be present if, on saline contrast injection, there was appearance of at least 1 microbubble in the left atrium within 3 cardiac cycles after opacification of the RA.18,19 PFO size and shunt were determined by demonstrating the maximum separation of septum primum from secundum, and the maximum number of microbubbles visualized in the left atrium within 3 cardiac cycles from opacification of the RA. PFOs with
2 mm separation of the septum primum and secundum, or with
10 microbubbles appearing in the left atrium, were classified as large. All other PFOs were classified as small.
Atrial septal excursion (ASE) was defined as a motion of interatrial septum from its midline position into the left atrium or RA. ASA was determined to be present when ASE was
10 mm.20 A prominent EV was defined as a protrusion of
10 mm of a linear membranelike structure from the junction of the RA with the IVC. RA filamentous strands were defined as freely mobile linear filamentous structures in the RA with attachment to any aspect of the RA wall visualized on any image plane.
Statistical Analysis
The distribution of stroke risk factors and stroke subtype was compared among the 3 race-ethnic groups (whites, blacks, Hispanics). The "other" racial categories did not include a sufficient number of subjects for statistical analysis. PFO and ASA prevalence and atrial morphological characteristics were then compared among the groups. Univariate analyses were performed with analysis of variance for continuous variables and the
2 test for categorical variables to test for any significant differences, defined as P<0.05. Multivariate analyses of categorical variables used a logistic regression model that included race-ethnic group, age, and sex. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the ß coefficients and their standard errors. For assessment of racial differences in TE-defined cryptogenic stroke risk factors, whites were used as the reference group.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
PFO and ASA
Overall, the prevalence of PFO was similar across the race-ethnic groups (Table 2). Prevalence of ASA, a combination of ASA and PFO, and prominent EV or RA filamentous strands were also similar among the groups. However, whites and Hispanics were more likely to have a larger PFO and a greater degree of shunt across the PFO than blacks (Table 3). The degree of ASE correlated with PFO size in the total cohort (r=0.37, P<0.0001), among whites (r=0.39, P=0.0002), and among Hispanics (r=0.53, P=0.0008). However, among blacks, the degree of ASE did not correlate significantly with PFO size (r=0.16, P=0.21). Thus, the degree of ASE was an indicator of PFO size among whites and Hispanics but not blacks.
|
|
When the 258 patients in the cryptogenic stroke subset were considered separately, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of PFO, but whites and Hispanics had a significantly higher prevalence of prominent EV or RA filamentous strands (Table 2). PFO size tended to be larger among whites and Hispanics than blacks (Table 3), but the difference did not attain statistical significance. The prevalence of ASA and degree of ASE among the cryptogenic stroke patients did not vary across race-ethnic groups (Tables 2 and 3
).
In the total cohort, after adjustment for age and sex, with whites as the reference group, blacks were less likely to have a large PFO or RA anatomy likely to predispose to paradoxical embolization (Table 4). Hispanics were not significantly different from whites. When similar analyses were performed for the cryptogenic subset (Table 4), blacks again were less likely to have RA anatomical variation predisposing to paradoxical embolization. Although not achieving statistical significance, there was a trend toward a paucity of large PFOs among blacks.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the initial description by Cohnheim21 in 1877, PFO has been recognized as a potential conduit for paradoxical embolization leading to cerebral ischemia. Because the prevalence of PFO in the general population is
29%, there are specific morphological and functional characteristics of a PFO that are important in modifying the associated risk for stroke. Size of PFO and degree of right-to-left shunt have been associated with cryptogenic stroke.19,22
In the overall study cohort, although no difference in PFO frequency was observed among race-ethnic groups, a larger PFO size with a greater degree of shunt was seen among whites and Hispanics compared with blacks. When cryptogenic stroke patients were analyzed separately, a larger PFO and the presence of RA anatomy predisposing to paradoxical embolization were seen more frequently among whites and Hispanics. Thus, these may be relatively more important risk factors for stroke among whites and Hispanics than among blacks.
In this study, no significant difference was seen in the prevalence of ASA or degree of ASE among the race-ethnic groups. However, differences were seen regarding the correlation of ASE with PFO size. This relationship was seen in the overall population and persisted among whites and Hispanics. However, among blacks, the degree of ASE was not an indicator of PFO size, most likely because of a high prevalence of small PFOs in this group. As such, the importance of ASA as a risk factor for cryptogenic stroke may not be as significant among blacks as in the other race-ethnic groups. In the only other study that compared TE-defined stroke risk factors in a biracial cohort, Kizer et al23 found a lower prevalence of PFO among blacks compared with whites. This may be due to the high prevalence of small PFOs among blacks, which may have been difficult to detect.
In 1897, Chiari24 described a network of threads and fibers found in the RA. Filamentous strands in the RA can span the course of the EV along the atrial wall at the origin of the IVC. Along with a prominent EV, these structures are thought to be risk factors for paradoxical embolism by preferentially directing blood flow from the IVC toward the interatrial septum and through a PFO.1113 Our study showed a greater prevalence of prominent EV or RA filamentous strands among whites and Hispanics compared with blacks. This was the case for both the overall stroke group and the cryptogenic subset. Because these anatomical features are thought to be associated with paradoxical embolization, this mechanism of stroke may not be as important for cryptogenic stroke in blacks.
PFO and ASA can be considered congenital anatomical variations. Studies of live-born infant databases have reported a significantly higher prevalence of small atrial septal defects among whites compared with blacks and Hispanics.25,26 Race-ethnic variations, including those of the present study, may reflect different genetic and environmental interactions.27
Ischemic stroke subtypes have been shown to differ by race-ethnicity.28 In this study, we confirm this observation in a triethnic population. Blacks and Hispanics are at a higher risk for lacunar infarcts, whereas whites are more prone to cryptogenic stroke. Much of this may derive from the different stroke risk profile among the 3 groups in our study. Hypertension and diabetes were more prevalent among blacks and Hispanics compared with whites. As such, the finding of a large PFO and RA anatomy that predisposes to paradoxical embolization is a reflection of a predominant stroke subtype among whites. Among cryptogenic stroke patients, the paucity of large PFOs and lack of RA anatomy favoring paradoxical embolization in blacks suggest that this may not be as important a mechanism for cryptogenic stroke among this race-ethnic group. Hispanics appear to reflect a heterogeneous cohort; although their stroke profile resembles that of blacks, their cardiac anatomy with regards to large PFO and RA anatomy is closer to that of whites.
Although not addressed in this study, genetic variation in the predisposition for prothrombotic state is likely to influence the importance of atrial anatomy associated with paradoxical embolization. That is, a combination of predisposition to form venous thrombus and atrial anatomy enhancing interatrial shunt may lead to a higher chance for paradoxical embolization.29,30 Indeed, the higher prevalence of such factors as factor V Leiden mutation31 and prothrombin G20210A in whites32 may have contributed to the greater prevalence of cryptogenic strokes among this race-ethnic group because the prothrombotic state is likely to enhance the role of large PFOs as a conduit for paradoxical embolization.
The strengths of this study are that it was multicenter, representative of a national cohort, and racially heterogeneous, including Hispanics, a group that has not been well studied. Its systematic assessment of TE-defined stroke risk factors represents one of the largest samples of TE-studied subjects to date. Our study is also the first to include data pertaining not just to the prevalence of PFO but also its morphological and functional characteristics, including RA anatomy, among different race-ethnic groups. Limitations include the fact that all subjects were stroke patients involved in a clinical trial, and some element of referral bias may have been present. Also the method of analyzing PFO size and shunt is semiquantitative at best and prone to variation. Nevertheless, this study remains the first to address the prevalence of ASA, PFO, and atrial anatomical variations in a well-characterized group of patients from different race-ethnic groups.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data Management Center members: R.M. Lazar, D.E. Gohs, M. Clavijo, K. Slane, D. Balbuena, D. Martino, C. Inguanzo, J. Pittman, R.R. Sciacca, K. Evans, K. Lord, B. Jaffe, J. Kim, L. Lynn, J. Ruzicka, P. Chugh, A. Zidel, B. Fields, M. Coleman, R. King, J.G. Mohr, I. Carretero, O. Mendoza, A. Barlow.
Statistical Analysis Committee members: J.L.P. Thompson, B. Levin, W. Ma, T. Costigan, A. Murphy, X. Chen, E. Etienne, R. Hilbawi, K. Sridharan, D. Burroughs, G. Kanu, R. Okunieff, D. Xu, K. Chin.
NINDS Performance and Safety Monitoring Board members: D.G. Sherman (chair), M.L. Dyken, A. Lowe, I. Meissner, D.W. Taylor.
Adjudication Committee: H.J.M. Barnett, C.M. Fisher, J.C. Gautier, P. Sandercock, J.P. Whisnant.
Neuroradiologist adjudicator: S.K. Hilal (deceased), J. Pile-Spellman.
Hemorrhage adjudicator: A.G.G. Turpie.
The following lists the institution, local neurology principal investigator, cardiology investigator, coordinators, and number of patients who contributed to PICSS:
Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center: R. Sacco, S. Homma, R. Marshall, M. Elkind, C. Stapf, H. Mast, M. Clavijo (82); Long Island Jewish Medical Center: R. Libman, S. Roth, R. Gonzaga-Camfield (53); Georgetown University: M. Yaseen, D. Lu, J. Burfoot, E. Green (47); University of Illinois Medical Center: C. Helgason, S. Devries, J. Hoff, T. Gnutek (41); University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics: H.P. Adams, Jr, B. Bendixen, B. Vandenberg, A. Tanna, L. Vining (38); Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center: C. Johnson, E. Shapiro, C. Early, J. Alt (30); University of Texas Medical School: J. Grotta, F. Thandrayen, D. Vital (29); Buffalo General Hospital: P. Pullicino, Z. Hajduczek, M. Hens, N. Meiler, A. Martinez (23); Cleveland Clinic Foundation: C. Sila, B. Stewart, B. Dyko, N. Rudd (21); Massachusetts General Hospital: J. Kistler, M. Picard, K.L. Furie, F. Buonanno, L. Oertel (21); Montefiore Medical Center: D.M. Rosenbaum, M. Nanna, E. Klonowski, S. Rybak, J. Nonan (19); Henry Ford Hospital: P. Mitsias, S. Smith, K. Sawaya, P. Marchese, J. Reuther (17); University of Miami School of Medicine: R. Kelley, M. Bilsker, A. Forteza, J. Arias (17); Lankenau Medical Research Center: M. Alter, A. Sokiil, G. Friday, M. Lloyd, T. Listner, A. Smith (15); Stanford Stroke Center: G.W. Albers, I. Schnittger, N. Hock, S. Kemp (15); Mt Sinai School of Medicine: S. Tuhrim, M. Goldman, S. Augustine (14); Vanderbilt Medical Center: H. Kirschner, B.F. Byrd, A. Nelson, S. OConnell, K. Heyden, D. Klein (13); University of Kentucky Medical Center: R. Dempsey, P. Sapin, L. Pettigrew, B. Stidham, I. Lamb (12); Pennsylvania Hospital: D. Jamieson, S. Mandal, C. Gonnella, M. Hellstern (12); New England Medical Center: M. Pessin, S. Schwartz, L. Caplan, L. Barron (11); Rochester General Hospital: J. Hollander, L. von Doenhoff, C. Weber (11); Indiana University Medical Center: J. Biller, D. Segar, L. Chadwick (9); Cleveland Clinic Florida: B. Dandapani, H. Bush, V. Salanga, P. Parks, M. Piccirillo (8); New York University-New York VA: H. Weinreb, A. Gindea, K. Siller, L. Chin, G. Allen (8); Wayne State University: S. Chaturvedi, S. Levine, L. Femino, E. St Pierre, L. Quinones, F. Mada (8); Minneapolis: D. Anderson, A. Asinger, D. Brauer, D. Radtke (6); University of Southern California: M. Fisher, P.A.N. Chandraratna, G. Fischberg, A. Scicli, A. Mohammad (6); Albert Einstein (Pa) Medical Center: J. Dissin, S. Sillman, L. Jacobs, C. Borschell (5); Metrohealth Medical Center: J. Schmidley, R. Finkelhor, M. Winkelman, A. Liskay (5); Boston University Medical Center: C. Kase, R. Davidoff, E. Licata-Gehr, N. Allen (4); Marshfield Clinic: P. Karanjia, D. Horton, S. Lobner, L. Stephani (4); University of Michigan Medical Center: M. Chimowitz, W. Armstrong, Z. Noorani (4); University of California at San Diego Medical Center: C. Jackson, D. Blanchard, N. Kelly, J. Werner (4); St Paul-Ramsey Medical Center: M. Ramirez-Lassepas, J.T. Suh, C. Espinosa (3); Yale University School of Medicine: L. Brass, C.C. Jaffe, A. Lovejoy, B. Kennedy (3); Syracuse VA Medical Center: A. Culebras, R. Carleson, M. Benedict, D. Pastor, T. Dean (3); Beth Israel Hospital, Boston: C. Mayman, W. Manning, S. Warach, L.R. Caplan, M. Tijerina (2); Little Rock (Ark) VA Medical Center: M. Chesser, B. Boop, S. Nazarian, L. Kennedy (2); University of South Alabama: J. Rothrock, R. Zweifler, S. Cunningham, R. Yunker (2); Maimonides Medical Center: A. Miller, A. Greengart, L.R. Caplan, K. Chin, T. LaRocca (1); University of Tennessee at Memphis: K. Gaines, S. Gubin, B. OBrien, C. Bonds, J. Shaw, A. Payne (1); and University of Vermont: J. Dissin, R. Battle, R. Hamill, P. Krusinski, M. Fitzpatrick (1).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 23, 2003; revision received March 7, 2003; accepted April 1, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Sievert, E. Fischer, C. Heinisch, N. Majunke, A. Roemer, and N. Wunderlich Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Without an Implant: Initial Clinical Experience Circulation, October 9, 2007; 116(15): 1701 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Di Tullio, R. L. Sacco, R. R. Sciacca, Z. Jin, and S. Homma Patent Foramen Ovale and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in a Multiethnic Population J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2007; 49(7): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Sacco, R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, P. Gorelick, J. Halperin, R. Harbaugh, et al. Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): e409 - e449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Sacco, R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, P. Gorelick, J. Halperin, R. Harbaugh, et al. Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 577 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Homma and R. L. Sacco Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 1063 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Seiler How should we assess patent foramen ovale? Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1245 - 1247. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Cheng Stroke in China Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35 (2): e24 - e24. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |