| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:e163.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Reports |
From the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University (P.B., J.B., S.S.), and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital (P.B., C.B., J.B., A.K., S.S.), and Division of Cardiology (J.B.), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Reprint requests to Paul Brassard, MSc, MD, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital (MUHC), 687 Pine Ave W, Ross 4.29, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1. E-mail paul.brassard{at}clinepi.mcgill.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods A cohort of 29 937 elderly subjects initiating antihypertensive therapy between 1982 and 1995 was formed from the Quebec healthcare insurance database. A nested case-control design was used in which each subject hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of stroke between 1987 and 1995 was matched on calendar time to 5 randomly selected controls from the cohort. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios of stroke after adjustment for predisposing factors.
Results We identified 1888 cases and 9440 controls. The overall adjusted odds ratio for current antibiotic use was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 1.01), and that for recent use was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.94). Penicillin was the only individual antibiotic class that showed a protective association across different time windows. No significant association was found between stroke risk and the use of fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines, or cephalosporins.
Conclusions Although no clear, consistent associations between overall antibiotic use and cerebrovascular disease could be found, an intriguing association between penicillin use and stroke should be explored further.
Key Words: antibiotics atherosclerosis case-control studies infection primary prevention stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the effect of antibiotic use, regardless of the clinical indication or specific antibacterial activity, in the primary prevention of stroke in a general population of elderly patients initiating pharmacological treatment for hypertension.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See Editorial Comment; page e166
Study Design
A case-control analysis of a cohort of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients was conducted, with cases defined as any hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of stroke (ICD-9 code, 430 to 438). Admission date for stroke was labeled the index date. For each stroke hospitalization, a risk set of all subjects with the same month and year of cohort entry and still at risk for an event at the cases index date was identified. Five controls, selected at random within these risk sets through incidence-density sampling, were matched to each case accordingly. A detailed description of the cohort is available.5
Drug Exposure
Exposure history for antibiotics was available for up to 14 years before the index date. Because the latency period for stroke in relation to antibiotic use is not known, several a prioridefined time windows were used to document exposure: current (within 30 days of index date), recent (within 30 days to 1 year), and past (>1 year before) use. The prespecified hierarchy assignment order for simultaneous exposure to >1 of these time windows was the following: current>recent>past use. For each of these time windows, indicator variables were created for any antibiotic class (our primary analysis) and each individual antibiotic class (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, cephalosporins, penicillins, and others) and compared with no antibiotic use.
Adjustment Factors and Statistical Analyses
Cases of stroke were contrasted to controls regarding antibiotic use through multivariate conditional logistic regressions to account for the effect of matching. Hospital diagnoses or the use of prescribed medications at any time during follow-up was used to identify the following potential confounders: diabetes, prior coronary heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation), cardiomyopathy (including congestive heart failure), hyperlipidemia, and use of anticoagulants, corticosteroids, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We adjusted for all these factors in the analyses.
Data are not available on smoking status in these administrative databases. We attempted to circumvent the unavailability of such data by using a surrogate measure of the long-term complication of smoking composed of theophylline use or any hospitalization for pulmonary diseases. This measure was included in the multivariate analyses.
Adjusted odds ratios (ORs), approximations to the rate ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented throughout this article.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Among individual antibiotic classes, only penicillin use was found to be associated with stroke, with stronger effects for current (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.86) than recent (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.86) and past (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97) use. Although macrolides and fluoroquinolones showed a similar trend, no statistically significant effect on stroke risk was found. Use of tetracyclines, cephalosporins, or others combined was also not associated with stroke.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other studies have examined whether antibiotics effective against specific bacteria such as Chlamydia pneumoniae (fluoroquinolones, macrolides, or tetracyclines), regardless of their clinical indications, could lead to a decreased risk of ischemic events such as myocardial infarction.610 These studies have shown conflicting results. Our own experience failed to demonstrate a consistent protective association across antibiotic classes, although a nonsignificant protective trend diminishing with time was observed for antibiotics with antichlamydial activity (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.00 for use in the previous 3 months; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.11 for use in the previous 6 months).5 In contrast, only 1 prior study has examined the putative association between antibiotic use and the occurrence of ischemic stroke, with no significant associations.11 One reason for the negative result might be related to the particularly long period between their defined exposure and stroke outcome (mean time, 646 days).
A number of limitations pertaining to our study should be kept in mind. First, antibiotic use is only an indirect marker of the presence of infection, on which we have no clinical or serological data and which thus cannot be directly linked to the occurrence of stroke. We are also uncertain about patient compliance because actual antibiotic intake was not measured.
Because information on important risk factors is sometimes lacking, observational studies such as this one are especially sensitive to confounding and systematic biases. Smoking is one potentially important confounder of the association between antibiotic use and stroke, and unfortunately, no direct information relating to individual smoking habits is available in the Quebec administrative databases. Because it would be reasonable to think that smokers are more likely to be dispensed antibiotics, which are indicated, among other things, for exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, insufficient correction of cigarette use could bias our study results by decreasing any measured protective effect of antibiotics. Another potential confounding factor not controlled for in the present study was socioeconomic status. Because infectious diseases could be unequally distributed among different socioeconomic categories, antibiotic use could thus vary accordingly.
Another limitation pertains to the study source population. Because we had incomplete information on potential strokes occurring before our study period, it might have led to a lack of comparability of cases and controls with respect to preexisting atherosclerotic disease. However, our sensitivity analysis showed no differences in our findings when patients with multiple events occurring during the study period were excluded or when hemorrhagic strokes were excluded.
In addition to possible systematic biases, one should consider the role of random error or chance in our study findings. Because no attempt was made to account for multiple testing, type I error is a possible explanation for the statistically significant associations found. The relatively small number of cases and controls found in some of the current time windows could also have hindered our ability to demonstrate significant associations.
In conclusion, no clear, consistent effect of antibiotics use was found in relation to stroke in a high-risk elderly population. Further confirmation studies for penicillin use in other populations and an evaluation of the clinical significance of this finding remain to be performed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 17, 2003; revision received April 3, 2003; accepted April 29, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. E. Levesque, J. M. Brophy, and B. Zhang The Risk for Myocardial Infarction with Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Population Study of Elderly Adults Ann Intern Med, February 8, 2005; (2005) 0000605-200504050-00113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Levesque, J. M. Brophy, and B. Zhang The Risk for Myocardial Infarction with Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Population Study of Elderly Adults Ann Intern Med, April 5, 2005; 142(7): 481 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |