Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:1
Published online before print December 18, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000111515.14897.3B
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/1    most recent
01.STR.0000111515.14897.3Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hachinski, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hachinski, V.

(Stroke. 2004;35:1.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Our Readers Speak

Vladimir Hachinski, MD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief

From London Sciences Health Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Vladimir Hachinski, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Center, 339 Windermere Rd, London, Ontario N6A 5A5 Canada.

We continuously try to improve our journal, but are we succeeding? A readers’ survey was carried out by our publishers, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW), with the American Heart Association’s (AHA) endorsement by direct mail, by e-mail, and through a banner ad on Stroke’s home page. The aim was to determine subscribers’ and nonsubscribers’ perceptions and attitudes toward the journal and to current, new, and planned features, and to verify the readers’ demographic profiles.

The overall response rate was 11.3%, bettering the goal of 10%. Overall, 92% of respondents reported being either "extremely satisfied" or "satisfied" with the current features and contents of the journal. Commonly used adjectives were "comprehensive," "focused," "informative," "current," "interesting," "quality," "relevant," and "up-to-date." Ninety-one percent were "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to recommend Stroke. Ninety percent thought that our journal was "much better" or "better" than other journals; 61% were "most interested" in clinical research, 60% in clinical practice, and 18% in basic science.

On balance, our readers liked the new features that we have introduced: Advances in Stroke, Cochrane Corner, Controversies, and Research Reports.

Regarding potential new features, 57% of respondents were most interested in peer-reviewed, critically appraised topics (CATS) and 15% in continuing medical education (CME).

The readership favored separating clinical and basic science articles and providing additional headings for the types of article according to areas. Stroke is a journal that publishes "reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases from many disciplines." Providing subspecialized labels only encourages further fragmentation of knowledge, interests, and efforts. While we follow a general sequence of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, rehabilitation, prevention, basic science, and health policy, in sequencing the articles, we cluster them according to topics and across categories, and we commission editorial comments that may add context, facts, and interpretation.

Overall, readers think that we are on the right track. Many thanks to them, the AHA, and LWW. We shall work even harder to continue to earn our readers’ approval in an ever-changing, competitive publishing environment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, V. W. Mark, C. Perkins, and G. Uswatte
Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2468 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, C. Perkins, M. Ortmann, V. W. Mark, and G. Uswatte
Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1520 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. J Page, P. Levine, A. Leonard, J. P Szaflarski, and B. M Kissela
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2008; 88(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. J Page and P. Levine
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Patients With Chronic Stroke Exhibiting Minimal Movement Ability in the Affected Arm
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 872 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Cohen, K. Masyn, J. Adams, D. Hessl, S. Rivera, F. Tassone, J. Brunberg, C. DeCarli, L. Zhang, J. Cogswell, et al.
Molecular and imaging correlates of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome
Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light, and P. A. Thompson
The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.
Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1189 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. K. King, D. Morris, J. E. Crago, and A. Chatterjee
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1045 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
M.O. McCarron, G. Davey Smith, and P. McCarron
Secular stroke trends: early life factors and future prospects
QJM, February 1, 2006; 99(2): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, M. Vignolo, and K. McCulloch
Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use
Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2493 - 2496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Pelz, T. Andersson, P. Lylyk, M. Negoro, and M. Soderman
Stroke Review: Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2004
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 211 - 214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/1    most recent
01.STR.0000111515.14897.3Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hachinski, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hachinski, V.