Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:2-6
Published online before print December 18, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109041.89959.4C
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/2    most recent
01.STR.0000109041.89959.4Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, A.

(Stroke. 2004;35:2.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Expedited Publication

Preventive Antibacterial Treatment Improves the General Medical and Neurological Outcome in a Mouse Model of Stroke

Christian Meisel, MD; Konstantin Prass, MD; Johann Braun, MD; Ilya Victorov, MD; Tilo Wolf, MD; Dirk Megow, PhD; Elke Halle, MD; Hans-Dieter Volk, MD; Ulrich Dirnagl, MD Andreas Meisel, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (K.P., J.B., T.W., D.M., U.D., A.M.), Medical Immunology (C.M., H.-D.V.), and Microbiology (E.H.), Medical Faculty Charité, Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany, and Brain Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia (I.V.).

Reprint requests to Dr Andreas Meisel, Department of Neurology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Schumannstr 20–21, 10098 Berlin, Germany. E-mail andreas.meisel{at}charite.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a high incidence of infections after severe stroke and their prominent role in morbidity and mortality in stroke patients. In a mouse model, it has been shown recently that stroke is coupled with severe and long-lasting immunosuppression, which is responsible for the development of spontaneous systemic infections. Here, we investigated in the same model the effects of preventive antibiotic treatment on survival and functional outcome of experimental stroke.

Methods— Mice were subjected to experimental stroke by occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) for 60 minutes. A group of mice received moxifloxacin (6x100 mg/kg body weight every 2 hours over 12 hours) either immediately or 12 hours after MCAO. Control animals received the vector only. Behavior, neurological deficit, fever, survival, and body weight were monitored over 14 days. In a subgroup, infarct volume was measured 4 days after MCAO. Microbiological assessment was based on cultures of lung tissue, blood, and feces of animals 3 days after stroke. For a dose-response study, moxifloxacin was given immediately after MCAO in different doses and at different time points.

Results— Microbiological analyses of blood and lung tissue demonstrated high bacterial burden, mainly Escherichia coli, 3 days after stroke. Accordingly, we observed clinical and histological signs of septicemia and pneumonia. Moxifloxacin prevented the development of infections and fever, significantly reduced mortality, and improved neurological outcome.

Conclusions— Preventive antibiotic treatment may be an important new therapeutical approach to improve outcome in patients with severe stroke.


Key Words: antibiotics • pneumonia • stroke • mice


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Among the complications of acute stroke, the risk of relapsing cerebral ischemia or complicating mass effects resulting from edema is well known.1 However, clinical experience and clinical studies also demonstrate the high incidence of infectious complications after stroke. Among patients with different types of stroke, 16% to 61% develop fever, a clinically significant infection is diagnosed in 21% to 65%, and 10% to 22% of stroke patients acquire pneumonia.2–6 Pneumonia is the most common cause of death in stroke patients.7,8 The incidence of infections among stroke patients is thus significantly higher than the general prevalence of hospital-acquired infections (4% to 9% of all hospitalized patients) and that reported among surgical patients (3%).9 The risk of developing infections is highest within the first 2 days after stroke.6 However, it persists beyond the acute phase, and complicating infections are common also during rehabilitation.10

An immunosuppressive state was postulated as a reason for the increased infectious vulnerability in stroke patients as early as 1974.11 Recently, this hypothesis was reinforced by describing a stroke-induced immunodepression syndrome (SIDS) after experimental stroke in mice.12 SIDS is characterized by a rapid and long-lasting suppression of cellular immune responses. Furthermore, SIDS is invariably accompanied by spontaneous development of pneumonia and septicemia in this model. Importantly, immunological alterations in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mice occur before blood or lung bacteria become detectable, demonstrating that a compromised antibacterial defense gives rise to bacterial infections.

On the basis of these findings, we explored the effects of preventive antibacterial therapy on the incidence of infections and outcome in a well-established mouse model of experimental stroke.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animal Model
For all experiments, we used >=7-week-old male Sv129/J mice weighing 18 to 22 g. All experiments were performed and quantified in a randomized fashion by investigators (I.V., K.P.) blinded to treatment groups. All surgical procedures were approved by the local authorities. The surgical procedure of MCAO did not exceed 10 minutes and was performed as described elsewhere.13 Briefly, a monofilament was introduced into the common carotid artery under halothane narcosis, advanced to the origin of the MCA, and left there for 60 minutes until reperfusion. Occlusion and reperfusion were verified by laser Doppler flowmetry (Peri Flux 4001 Master, Perimed). During surgery and MCAO, rectal temperature was maintained between 37.0°C and 37.5°C with a heating pad. Mice were kept in heated cages for the next 2 hours, and rectal temperature was frequently measured. Animals were then returned to their home cages and allowed free access to food and water. Brains were removed 4 days after reperfusion, snap-frozen, and stored at -70°C. Infarct areas were quantified in 20-µm hematoxylin and eosin–stained cryostat sections with an image analysis system (Sigma Scan Pro, Jandel Scientific). Infarction volume was obtained by numeric integration of areas of marked pallor times section distance. For adoptive lymphocyte transfer, single-cell suspensions were prepared from spleens of healthy littermates as described.12 Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 5x106 splenocytes or, for control, with medium 11 hours after MCAO.

Drug Administration
Moxifloxacin (MXFX; Bayer Vital GmbH) was dissolved in a mixture of saline and 1 mol/L HCl (10:1) and adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH. To determine the effect of preventive antibacterial treatment and for bacteriological analysis, animals (n=30 per group) received 100 mg/kg body weight MXFX IP in 100 µL 6 times every 2 hours. Administration of MXFX was started either immediately (MXFX 0 to 10 hours) or 12 hours after MCAO (MXFX 12 to 22 hours). Control animals were treated with diluent. For a dose-response study, MXFX was given immediately after MCAO in different doses and at different time points as described in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Spectrum of Bacteria Found 3 Days After MCAO in Blood, Lung, and Intestine of Mice Treated With Either Moxifloxacin or Diluent*

Monitoring
Mice were monitored over 14 days for survival, behavior, body weight, rectal temperature, and neurological deficit by a modified score as described14: 0=no deficit, 1=decreased extension of forepaw, 2=circling, 3=loss of postural reflexes, 4=death.

Microbiological Analysis
Anesthetized mice were washed with 70% ethanol under sterile conditions. Blood was collected by decapitation. The lungs were removed after thoracotomy and homogenized. For determination of colony-forming units, 100 µL tissue homogenate or blood was serially diluted, plated onto blood agar plates (Merck), and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours, and bacterial colonies were counted. For characterization of the bacterial spectrum in blood and lung tissue, the BacT/Alert (BioMerieux) culture system was used. For characterization of intestinal bacteria, feces was transported in Amies medium and cultured on 5% sheep blood, MacConkey, chocolate, Sabouraud, and Columbia blood agar. Positive cultures were first analyzed by Gram’s staining, then subcultured on the same media for 24 to 72 hours, and subsequently identified by commercially available biochemical tests (Api, BioMerieux).

Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with the statistical software SPSS. Differences in group survival and neurological deficit were determined by Fisher’s exact test. Differences in group weight were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction, with time as a within-subject factor and treatment as a between-subject factor. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The early mortality in MXFX- and diluent-treated animals equally amounted to {approx}14% to 20% until day 4 after stroke. However, only another 5% of the MXFX-treated animals died, whereas 57% of mice treated with diluent were dead by day 6 (P=0.004, diluent versus MXFX 0 to 10 hours; P=0.008, diluent versus MXFX 12 to 22 hours). No significant difference in survival between the 2 MXFX treatment groups was observed (Figure 1A). All sham-operated animals remained sterile12 and survived for at least 42 days (n=15, data not shown). Physiological parameters (body weight, mean arterial pressure) were not significantly different between all studied groups (data not shown).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. MXFX improves survival (A) and prevents fever and hypothermia (B) after MCAO. Mice (n=30 in each group) underwent MCAO and received either 6x 100 mg/kg body weight MXFX every 2 hours for indicated interval (MXFX 0 to 10 hours, MXFX 12 to 22 hour) or diluent. A, Differences in survival between MXFX- and diluent-treated mice were tested for significance on day 14 after MCAO and are indicated by asterisks (**P<0.01, Fisher’s exact test). B, Rectal temperature was measured at the indicated time points. Data are given as mean±SD of the surviving animals in each group.

Two hours after ischemia, the rectal temperature of all animals dropped to the temperature of the heated cage (37°C) and normalized (37.5°C) by 4 hours. Administration of MXFX 0 to 10 hours completely prevented the development of fever (Figure 1B). In animals that received MXFX 12 to 22 hours, temperatures rose to 38.5°C at 12 hours but normalized soon after treatment was begun. In contrast, temperatures further increased to 39°C in diluent-treated animals and remained high until 24 hours. Two days after ischemia, however, these animals developed hypothermia (down to 32°C) as a sign of sepsis. Normalization of rectal temperature occurred only in the surviving 43% of animals between days 5 and 8 (Figure 1B).

The course of body weight was determined as a measure of general stress induced by cerebral ischemia and recovery from it. With no significant difference between the 2 groups, MXFX-treated animals displayed a weight loss of 11±8% (mean±SD) until day 5 and had almost regained their weight (99±7%) by day 14 after ischemia (Figure 2). Diluent-treated animals showed a significantly greater weight loss (25±8% on day 5), and the surviving animals reached only 91±7% of their original weight by day 14 (P<0.001, diluent versus MXFX 0 to 10 hours; P<0.001, diluent versus MXFX 12 to 22 hours).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. MXFX decreases weight loss after cerebral ischemia. Mice (n=30 in each group) were treated with either MXFX or diluent as described in Figure 1. Body weight was measured at the indicated time points. Data are given as mean±SD of surviving animals in each group. Significant differences between MXFX- and diluent-treated mice are indicated by asterisks (***P<0.001).

To assess the effect of preventive antibiotic therapy on neurological outcome, we compared infarct volumes on day 4 and, in a separate group of animals, the neurological deficit measured daily until day 7 after stroke with a modified Bederson score.14 Infarct volumes tended to be smaller in both MXFX treatment groups (Figure 3). However, a statistically significant difference was observed only in the late treatment group (107±11.9 versus 89.6±8.2 mm3, diluent versus MXFX 12 to 22 hours; P<0.05). To test whether MXFX reduces infarct size by preventing bacterial infections or by direct neuroprotective mechanisms, we performed adoptive lymphocyte transfer experiments. Transfer of splenocytes from healthy littermates restored immune function and thereby prevented infections after MCAO, as demonstrated previously.12 After lymphocyte transfer, late treatment with MXFX (12 to 22 hours) did not further reduce infarct volume significantly, although there was a trend toward smaller infarcts in the MXFX-treated group (n=14 each group; 88.5±28.8 versus 74.8±21.8 mm, medium plus MXFX versus splenocytes plus MXFX; P=0.25, 2-tailed Student’s t test).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of preventive antibacterial therapy on infarct volume 4 days after MCAO. Mice (n=7 in each group) were treated with either MXFX or diluent as described in Figure 1. Data are given as mean±SD (*results differed from the diluent-treated group, P<0.05, ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction.).

With respect to the functional deficit, there was no significant difference between MXFX-treated and diluent-treated animals until day 2 after stroke. However, MXFX-treated animals showed a significantly faster and better functional recovery after day 2 (Figure 4). On day 7 after MCAO, 43% of diluent-treated mice had either fully recovered (score=0) or retained a measurable neurological deficit (score=1) (57% of animals had died). In contrast, {approx}80% of MXFX-treated animals displayed either no or only a small deficit (score <=1) on day 7. No significant differences in severity of neurological deficit or functional recovery were observed between the 2 MXFX-treatment groups.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. MXFX improves neurological deficit. Mice (n=30 in each group) received either MXFX or diluent as described in Figure 1. Neurological deficits were assessed as described in Materials and Methods. Data are given as cumulative percentage of mice in each group with respective deficit score at indicated time points. Significant differences in number of animals with deficit scores of <=1 or >=2 between MXFX- and diluent-treated mice are indicated by asterisks (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, Fisher’s exact test).

Most bacterial organisms found in blood and lung cultures of diluent-treated mice 3 days after cerebral ischemia were also present in the intestinal flora (Table 1). The most commonly found bacteria were Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, which are facultative pathogens of the intestinal compartment. No bacterial growth was observed in blood and lung cultures of MXFX-treated animals. Antibacterial treatment did not measurably change the intestinal flora (Table 1).

For a dose-response study, MXFX was given immediately after MCAO in different doses (10, 30, and 100 mg/kg body weight) and at different time points (single dose or 3 times every 2 hours). Quantitative blood and lung bacteriological analysis was done 3 days after MCAO. There was no significant difference in survival between treatment groups on day 3 after MCAO (Table 2). Although regimens with 3x 10 and 1x 30 mg/kg body weight MXFX proved insufficient to prevent systemic infections, animals treated either with 3x 30, 1x 100, or 3x 100 mg MXFX showed no signs of bacteremia. However, application of at least 3x 100 mg MXFX was necessary to prevent pneumonia.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Effect of Several Dose Regimens of Moxifloxacin on Bacterial Counts in Lung and Blood*


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recently, it has been demonstrated in this mouse model (MCAO) that focal cerebral ischemia induces a long-lasting depression of the cell-mediated immunity (monocyte deactivation, lymphopenia, Th1/Th2 shift) associated with spontaneous pneumonia and septicemia. It was shown that an impaired early NK- and T-cell response, particularly reduced IFN-{gamma} production, is the critical stroke-induced defect of the antibacterial defense. This immunodeficiency is mainly caused by excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Because sham-operated animals remained sterile, susceptibility to infection resulted from stroke, not from surgical stress.12 In the present study, we demonstrated that stroke-related infections can be effectively prevented by antibacterial therapy with MXFX both immediately or 12 hours after experimental stroke. Consequently, preventive antibacterial therapy is shown to improve outcome after experimental stroke with a reduction in mortality by 40%. Moreover, in the treated groups, the proportion of animals with only mild or no deficit (80%) was almost twice that of untreated controls (43%).

In addition to their relevance for the improvement of stroke therapies (see below), the results of this study have implications for the currently used experimental stroke models as follows.

First, the commonly observed hyperthermia after experimental stroke15 is not necessarily a "central fever" caused by stroke-induced tissue damage (eg, in the hypothalamus) as proposed by Li et al.16 These authors argued that, in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia, the occurrence of fever after stroke depended on an infarction of the hypothalamus. MCAO in our model also damaged the hypothalamus (data not shown). However, because MXFX prevented infections and fever (Figure 1B and Table 2), we conclude that hyperthermia is caused by infections that develop as a result of the stroke-induced immunodepression rather than by central nervous dysfunction of temperature regulation. We suggest that hypothalamic damage may cause excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system, subsequently leading to SIDS.12 However, our data do not rule out a central fever in other models of stroke and in (noninfected) human stroke patients.

Second, the previously reported high mortality in the MCAO model17 after day 4 is less likely to be a direct effect of stroke (eg, by brain edema) than a consequence of SIDS and the related severe infections. Interestingly, the time course of the survival rate shows 2 phases. In the first phase (until day 4), 14% to 20% of mice in each group died (Figure 1A). This finding suggests that mortality in this phase is not due to infections but is probably caused by the brain lesion itself. After day 4, however, only another 5% of MXFX-treated mice died, whereas mortality in the untreated group increased dramatically and reached 57% by day 6 (Figure 1A). We conclude that this second phase is due to severe infections. Hitherto, long-term studies (eg, on neuronal plasticity and regeneration) in this stroke model were hampered by a generally high mortality. Thus, preventive antibacterial approaches may facilitate such studies. Furthermore, infections have to be considered in experimental stroke because varying degrees of infection may lead to significant variability in outcomes.

To date, all therapeutic efforts in the treatment of ischemic stroke have aimed at preventing further tissue loss beyond the initial core of cerebral ischemia, ie, damage due to secondary pathological mechanisms in the penumbra. Despite promising experimental results, several pharmacological approaches to secondary neuroprotection failed to be convincing in clinical trials. Thus, for most patients, besides thrombolysis and immediate secondary stroke prophylaxis, the acute therapy of ischemic stroke remains limited to general measures such as the maintenance of a supranormal blood pressure to ensure sufficient cerebrovascular perfusion and adjustment of blood glucose levels and rectal temperature.18 Beyond that and apart from rehabilitation, the bulk of stroke therapy consists of the management or prevention of complications,19 among which infections are most prominent.20 Regarding the established risk factors for deterioration of outcome during the acute phase of ischemic stroke,21,22 infections influence at least 2, by raising the rectal temperature and lowering the blood pressure. Additional harmful mechanisms like the systemic release of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1), activation of procoagulant and inhibition of anticoagulant pathways, or disturbances in the cerebral microvasculature have to be suspected.23 Although our data suggest that prevention of bacterial infections leads to neuroprotection, MXFX may have other, more direct mechanisms of action (eg, antiexcitotoxic, antiinflammatory) apart from its antibacterial effects, as described for other antibiotics like minocycline.24

Infectious complications, particularly pneumonia, are associated with worse functional outcome and increased mortality in stroke patients.8,25 Aspiration caused by dysphagia, frequently observed after severe strokes, is a known risk factor for pneumonia. However, because aspiration alone is not sufficient for the development of pneumonia, other predisposing factors such as an impaired immune response have been postulated.26,27 Indeed, a stroke-induced defect of the antibacterial immune defense has been demonstrated in experimental stroke.12 In stroke patients, the rate of infectious complications is proportional to the severity of the initial ischemic deficit.4,5,8,25 With respect to stroke size, our model equals large infarctions in the MCA territory, a subtype with the highest incidence of pneumonia in patients.25 Our results are therefore likely to be relevant especially for this subtype of ischemic stroke.

The prevention of complicating infections in our stroke model appears to salvage tissue at risk and to improve survival and functional outcome after stroke. We believe that our findings warrant clinical studies of preventive antibacterial therapy regimens in stroke patients.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany, and Hermann-und-Lilly-Schilling-Stiftung.


*    Footnotes
 
A patent application on preventive antiinfective therapy in stroke has been filed at the European Patent Office (PCT/EP03/02246). Patent owner is Charité, Humboldt University Berlin. Patent inventors are Andreas Meisel, Christian Meisel, Konstantin Prass, Elke Halle, Hans-Dieter Volk, and Ulrich Dirnagl.

Drs Meisel and Prass contributed equally to this article.

Received July 21, 2003; revision received October 6, 2003; accepted November 3, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Caplan LR. Worsening in ischemic stroke patients: is it time for a new strategy? Stroke. 2002; 33: 1443–1445.[Free Full Text]
  2. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP. Complications after acute stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27: 415–420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Castillo J, Antoni Dávalos MD, Jaume Marrugat MD, Manuel Noya MD. Timing for fever-related brain damage in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2455–2460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Johnston KC, Li JY, Lyden PD, Hanson SK, Feasby TE, Adams RJ, Faught RE Jr, Haley EC Jr. RANTTAS Investigators. Medical and neurological complications of ischemic stroke: experience from the RANTTAS trial: Stroke. 1998; 29: 447–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Grau AJ, Buggle F, Schnitzler P, Spiel M, Lichy C, Hacke W. Fever and infection early after ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 1999; 171: 115–120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1223–1229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Henon H, Godefroy O, Leys D, Mounier-Vehier F, Lucas C, Rondepierre P, Duhamel A, Pruvo JP. Early predictors of death and disability after acute cerebral ischemic event. Stroke. 1995; 26: 392–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Katzan IL, Cebul RD, Husak SH, Dawson NV, Baker DW. The effect of pneumonia on mortality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke. Neurology. 2003; 60: 620–625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Prass K, Meisel C, Wolf T, Volk H-D, Dirnagl U, Meisel A. Striking the immune system: stroke induced immune depression. In: Krieglstein J, ed. Pharmacology of Cerebral Ischemia. Stuttgart, Germany: Medpharm; 2003: 217–221.
  10. Kalra L, Yu G, Wilson K, Roots P. Medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1995; 26: 990–994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Howard RJ, Simmons RL. Acquired immunologic deficiencies after trauma and surgical procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974; 139: 771–782.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Prass K, Meisel C, Höflich C, Braun J, Halle E, Wolf T, Ruscher K, Victorov I, Priller J, Dirnagl U, Volk HD, Meisel A. Stroke-induced immunodeficiency promotes spontaneous bacterial infections and is mediated by sympathetic activation: reversal by post-stroke Th1-like immunostimulation. J Exp Med. 2003; 198: 725–736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Prass K, Ruscher K, Karsch M, Isaev N, Megow D, Priller J, Scharff A, Dirnagl U, Meisel A. Desferrioxamine induces delayed tolerance against cerebral ischemia in vivo and in vitro. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002; 22: 520–525.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Tsuji M, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, Bartkowski H. Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination. Stroke. 1986; 17: 472–476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Reglodi D, Somogyvari-Vigh A, Maderdrut JL, Vigh S, Arimura A. Postischemic spontaneous hyperthermia and its effects in middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2000; 163: 399–407.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Li F, Omae T, Fisher M. Spontaneous hyperthermia and its mechanism in the intraluminal suture middle cerebral artery occlusion model of rats. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2464–2470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Schabitz WR, Li F, Irie K, Sandage BW, Locke KW, Fisher M. Synergistic effects of a combination of low-dose basic fibroblast growth factor and citicoline after temporary experimental focal ischemia. Stroke. 1999; 30: 427–431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Adams HP Jr, Adams RJ, Brott T, del Zoppo GJ, Furlan A, Goldstein LB, Grubb RL, Higashida R, Kidwell C, Kwiatkowski TG, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1056–1083.[Free Full Text]
  19. Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L. Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? Lancet. 2001; 358: 1586–1592.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Langhorne P, Pollock A. What are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing. 2002; 31: 365–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Davenport R, Dennis M. Neurological emergencies: acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 68: 277–288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hajat C, Hajat S, Sharma P. Effects of poststroke pyrexia on stroke outcome: a meta-analysis of studies in patients. Stroke. 2000; 31: 410–414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. del Zoppo GJ, Becker KJ, Hallenbeck JM. Inflammation after stroke: is it harmful? Arch Neurol. 2001; 58: 669–672.[Free Full Text]
  24. Yrjanheikki J, Tikka T, Keinanen R, Goldsteins G, Chan PH, Koistinaho J. A tetracycline derivative, minocycline, reduces inflammation and protects against focal cerebral ischemia with a wide therapeutic window. Proc Natl Acad Sci U|S|A. 1999; 96: 13496–13500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hilker R, Poetter C, Findeisen N, Sobesky J, Jacobs A, Neveling M, Heiss WD. Nosocomial pneumonia after acute stroke: implications for neurological intensive care medicine. Stroke. 2003; 34: 975–981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 665–671.[Free Full Text]
  27. Perry L, Love CP. Screening for dysphagia and aspiration in acute stroke: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2001; 16: 7–18.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Chamorro, X. Urra, and A. M. Planas
Infection After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Manifestation of Brain-Induced Immunodepression
Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 1097 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U. Dirnagl, J. Klehmet, J. S. Braun, H. Harms, C. Meisel, T. Ziemssen, K. Prass, and A. Meisel
Stroke-Induced Immunodepression: Experimental Evidence and Clinical Relevance
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 770 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. Gee, A. Kalil, C. Shea, and K. J. Becker
Lymphocytes: Potential Mediators of Postischemic Injury and Neuroprotection
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 783 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Prass, J. S. Braun, U. Dirnagl, C. Meisel, and A. Meisel
Stroke Propagates Bacterial Aspiration to Pneumonia in a Model of Cerebral Ischemia
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2607 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. Rajajee, C. Kidwell, S. Starkman, B. Ovbiagele, J. R. Alger, P. Villablanca, F. Vinuela, G. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, A. Fredieu, et al.
Early MRI and outcomes of untreated patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke.
Neurology, September 26, 2006; 67(6): 980 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Vargas, J. P. Horcajada, V. Obach, M. Revilla, A. Cervera, F. Torres, A. M. Planas, J. Mensa, and A. Chamorro
Clinical Consequences of Infection in Patients With Acute Stroke: Is It Prime Time for Further Antibiotic Trials?
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 461 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Chamorro and J. Hallenbeck
The Harms and Benefits of Inflammatory and Immune Responses in Vascular Disease
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 291 - 293.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Hermier, N. Nighoghossian, L. Derex, M. Wiart, C. Nemoz, Y. Berthezene, and J. C. Froment
Hypointense leptomeningeal vessels at T2*-weighted MRI in acute ischemic stroke
Neurology, August 23, 2005; 65(4): 652 - 653.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Chamorro, J.P. Horcajada, V. Obach, M. Vargas, M. Revilla, F. Torres, A. Cervera, A.M. Planas, and J. Mensa
The Early Systemic Prophylaxis of Infection After Stroke Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Thijs
More bad news about atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2004; 25(19): 1670 - 1671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/2    most recent
01.STR.0000109041.89959.4Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, A.