(Stroke. 2004;35:46.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the University of Washington, Seattle (S.C.C., J.H.M., E.K., W.T.L.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (G.R., K.L.F.); University of Texas, Houston (L.A.K., J.C.G.); University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (W.S.B., J.A.H., C.B.); and Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (H.L.L.).
Correspondence to Steven C. Cramer, MD, University of California-Irvine, Department of Neurology, UCI Medical Center, 101 The City Drive South, Bldg 53, Room 203, Orange, CA 92868-4280. E-mail scramer{at}uci.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods At 5 sites, patients 18 to 60 years of age received an MRI venogram (MRV) of the pelvis within 72 hours of new symptom onset. Clinical data were then determined. Radiologists blinded to clinical data later read the scans.
Results The 95 patients who met entry criteria were scanned. Their mean±SD age was 46±10 years, and time from stroke onset to pelvic MRV scan was 49±16 hours. Compared with those with stroke of determined origin (n=49), patients with cryptogenic stroke (n=46) were significantly younger, had a higher prevalence of patent foramen ovale (61% versus 19%), and had less atherosclerosis risk factors. Cryptogenic patients had more MRV scans with a high probability for pelvic DVT (20%) than patients with stroke of determined origin (4%, P<0.03), with most having an appearance of a chronic DVT.
Conclusions In this study of young stroke patients evaluated early after stroke, patients with cryptogenic stroke showed differences in several clinical features compared with patients with stroke of determined origin, including increased prevalence of pelvic DVT. The results require confirmation but suggest that paradoxical embolus from the pelvic veins may be the cause of stroke in a subset of patients classified as having cryptogenic stroke.
Key Words: deep vein thrombosis embolism, paradoxical etiology pathophysiology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several findings suggest that pelvic veins may be an important source of thromboemboli in cryptogenic stroke. Autopsy studies have documented isolated pelvic vein or inferior vena cava thrombus in 16% of patients with pulmonary emboli (PE)8 and 22% of patients with paradoxical emboli in whom a source could be found.9,10 Clinical studies have identified pelvic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in several populations,1114 including cryptogenic PE,15,16 suggesting that thrombi can form in pelvic veins and embolize. More recently, pelvic DVT has also been described in series of patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO.1720
Prior studies suggest that pelvic veins may be an important source of thromboemboli and that the prevalence of PFO is particularly increased in younger patients with cryptogenic stroke. Limited information is available about pelvic DVT in young stroke patients, cryptogenic or otherwise. The Paradoxical Emboli From Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study was designed to test the hypothesis that, in young patients with stroke, the prevalence of pelvic DVT is increased when stroke is cryptogenic compared with when stroke is of determined origin.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Assessments
Of 109 patients enrolled, 10 were determined not to have had a stroke, and 4 others could not be scanned, leaving 95 patients (Table 1) for these analyses. Four of these 95 patients were enrolled <72 hours after stroke but for technical reasons could not be scanned until 0 to 6 hours beyond the 72-hour cutoff. These 4 patients are included in current analyses because excluding them did not change significant findings. In 52% of patients (49 of 95), a cause of stroke was identified, whereas 48% (46 of 95) were classified as cryptogenic. Enrollment began September 1999 with 2 centers; 3 others were added mid-2000. Enrollment concluded February 2002.
|
MRV Acquisition
MRVs were acquired with a GE 1.5-T system and a phased-array torso coil to provide insights into venous structure and flow. Scanning consisted of 2-dimensional axial time-of-flight (TOF) and phase-contrast (PC) pulse sequences. The field of view extended 24 cm inferiorly from the infrarenal inferior vena cava to the common femoral vein just inferior to the inguinal ligament. In-plane resolution was 1.5x2.5 mm. For TOF images, a spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence was used. Slices were 3 mm with 2-mm skip; repetition time was 47; and echo time was 3.5 ms. For PC images, slices were 5 mm thick without skip; slices were registered to TOF slices; repetition time was 45 ms; and echo time was 7.5 ms. PC images used a superior saturation band and velocity encoding value of 20 cm/s. Both pulse sequences used a 60° flip angle and 1 signal average. No contrast injection was used. MRV signal is affected by plane, caliber, and flow velocity of veins. MRV in the present study provided consistent data from external iliac veins, common iliac veins, and a portion of the inferior vena cava; a very short segment of the common femoral vein was also studied per the field of view. Internal iliac veins were seen to a lesser degree, and paraprostatic/parauterine veins could not be consistently evaluated.
MRV Interpretation
Pelvic MRV images were reviewed by 2 radiologists (J.H.M., L.A.K.) specializing in abdominal-pelvic imaging who were blinded to all clinical data. Each radiologist was randomly assigned half of the scans not acquired in his own institution. Before study enrollment, the radiologists devised criteria for acute and chronic pelvic DVT and then refined these criteria after reviewing pelvic MRV scans from a separate study.20 Final criteria were similar to prior definitions for acute11 and chronic24 DVT.
Scans were judged as being high probability for pelvic DVT when there were at least 3 contiguous slices with a venous defect that was matched on TOF and PC images. A scan with intermediate probability for pelvic DVT had matched defects on only 2 contiguous slices. High-probability MRV scans were further classified as acute if the venous defect was a mural-based filling defect or as chronic if the vessel was narrowed without compression, often accompanied by circumferential thickening and/or collateral vessels. After final study interpretation of all scans, MRV scans with a high probability for DVT, along with 34 negative scans, were overread to assess interrater reliability.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were compared with a t test; categorical variables, with Fishers exact test or
2 test. All analyses were 2 tailed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients with cryptogenic stroke were clinically distinct compared with patients with stroke of determined origin; they were 7 years younger and had significantly lower atherosclerosis risk factor prevalence. Several venous thrombosis risk factors such as recent travel or miscarriage showed a trend toward higher frequency in patients with cryptogenic stroke (Table 1).
Echocardiography was performed in 92% of patients (Table 2), including 44 of 46 patients (96%) with cryptogenic stroke. In 2 patients, interatrial shunt was diagnosed by transcranial Doppler. The prevalence of any interatrial shunt (PFO or atrial septal defect) across the study was 39%, with the rate in cryptogenic stroke patients (61%) being >3 times higher than in patients with stroke of determined origin. Hypercoagulation testing was performed inconsistently across patients, with 23% of patients receiving 0 of the 6 tests recorded by the study (anticardiolipin antibody IgG and IgM, activated protein C resistance, and levels of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III). Leg vein duplex, ordered per clinical judgment, identified 1 leg DVT.
|
The 95 patients underwent pelvic MRV 48.9±16.1 hours after stroke onset. Scanning did not conform to the protocol in 13 patients: The entire infrarenal inferior vena cava was not visualized in 9 patients, a superior saturation band was applied to both TOF and PC images in 3 patients, and only TOF images were acquired in 1 patient with a normal scan.
A pelvic DVT (the Figure) was present with high probability in 11 patients (Table 3). The prevalence of pelvic DVT was significantly higher (P<0.025) in patients with cryptogenic stroke (9 of 46, 20%) than in patients with stroke of determined origin (2 of 49, 4%). The difference in percentages was significant whether we considered only scans with a high probability for DVT (difference, 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2 to 28.8) or scans with intermediate or high probability for DVT (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 32.8). When only the 39% of study patients with PFO or atrial septal defect were examined, a pelvic DVT was present more often in patients with cryptogenic stroke, but this difference was not significant (Table 3).
|
|
In the 11 patients with high probability for pelvic DVT, MRV were acquired a mean of 41.7 hours after stroke onset. Thrombi involved external iliac vein in 6, common iliac vein in 4, and internal iliac vein in 1. Most DVT had a chronic appearance. Three of these 11 patients had received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute stroke; in all 3, DVT had a chronic appearance. The 11 patients with high probability for pelvic DVT compared with the 84 other patients had a higher NIH stroke scale score (8.2±6.5 versus 4.9±4.5, P<0.04). Of these 11, none had a prior stroke or DVT, and no DVT risk factor was significantly different compared with patients without a pelvic DVT, although there was a trend toward a higher rate of prior miscarriage among female patients with a pelvic DVT (67% versus 12%, P=0.062). During interrater reliability assessments, the second radiologist found a high probability for DVT in 4 of the 11 MRVs initially diagnosed with a high probability for pelvic DVT and found the scan to be negative in 29 of the 34 MRVs that were initially negative for DVT. With these values,
=0.23, representing a fair25 level of interrater agreement.
Of the 9 cryptogenic stroke patients with high probability for pelvic DVT, all underwent echocardiographic evaluation, which showed PFO in 6. Of the remaining 3 patients, features of history suggested DVT in 2: 1 had an airplane flight the day before stroke and was assessed by transthoracic echocardiogram, and 1 had a history of spontaneous abortion. All 6 hypercoagulation tests were performed in 7 of 9, normal in all cases.
Of the 2 patients with stroke of determined origin and high probability for pelvic DVT, both had a large-artery stroke, had chronic appearance to pelvic DVT, received intravenous tPA acutely, and had PFO by transthoracic echocardiogram.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The prevalence of DVT in prior studies of patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke has varied widely, possibly because a consistent evaluation of the venous system was not performed early after stroke onset. Gautier et al26 performed venography 2 days to 7 months after cryptogenic transient ischemic attack or stroke and found that 3 of 23 patients with PFO had leg DVT and 3 had common iliac vein compression. Ranoux et al27 performed venography within 4 weeks of cryptogenic stroke and found that 1 of 13 patients with PFO had leg DVT. Lethen et al28 performed venography an average of 8 days after transient ischemic stroke or stroke of suspected cardiac origin and found that 5 of 53 patients with PFO had iliac or calf DVT. Stollberger et al29 found leg or pelvic DVT in 19 of 29 patients with PFO days to months after cryptogenic arterial embolus. The present study found pelvic DVT a mean of 2 days after stroke in 9 of 46 patients with cryptogenic stroke and in 6 of 28 patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO.
Isolated pelvic DVT has historically been considered rare but recently has been increasingly recognized as an important clinical entity. The infrequency with which pelvic DVT has been diagnosed in the past may be due to a number of reasons,30 particularly the limited sensitivity of contrast venography, 125I-fibrinogen scanning, and Doppler for DVT in the pelvic veins.11,3133 However, autopsy studies have found that pelvic veins were the only embolic source in 19 of 86 patients (22%) with paradoxical embolism in whom a source could be found,9,10 and isolated pelvic DVT was found in 16% of patients with PE.8 Spritzer et al,11 in 769 consecutive MRV studies of the entire leg and pelvis, found that 20% of DVT were isolated to the pelvic veins.
Several factors may have reduced the likelihood of diagnosing pelvic DVT in the present study. Rates of intravenous tPA (Table 2) were 10-fold greater than the US average,34 which may have dissolved some DVT before MRV. Interrater reliability for MRV interpretation was not high despite efforts to refine MRV diagnostic criteria and intersite consistency of MRI manufacturer/field strength. This may have reduced the strength of the association observed between a diagnosis of pelvic DVT and particular stroke subtypes. Newer methods for evaluating pelvic DVT16,3537 might show improved interrater reliability and therefore might identify a stronger relationship between pelvic DVT and cryptogenic stroke.
The present study found that patients with cryptogenic stroke have an increased prevalence of pelvic DVT compared with patients with stroke of determined origin. Most patients with cryptogenic stroke and pelvic DVT also had a PFO, a combination of results that suggests paradoxical embolism as the stroke mechanism. Strengths of the study include imaging before the time when most DVT develops after stroke and a focus on younger patients in whom the connection between PFO and cryptogenic stroke is stronger.4 Weaknesses of the study include the absence of a screening log, which complicates generalization of study results, and lack of data on prestroke antithrombotic medication usage, which, if different across groups (as suggested by risk factor imbalances in Table 1), might explain in part the lower DVT rate among patients with stroke of determined origin. Also, the study would have provided greater insight into the significance of pelvic DVT and might have been more precise in classifying strokes as cryptogenic if echocardiography, hypercoagulable testing, leg vein duplex, and carotid duplex had been standardized and if maximally sensitive methods38 had been used to search for a PFO. Furthermore, such an approach might have lent clarity to the diagnosis of pelvic DVT in the 3 cryptogenic stroke patients who were not diagnosed with PFO.
A substantial number of patients continue to be discharged without knowledge of stroke mechanism.13 The present results suggest that paradoxical embolus from the pelvic veins may be the cause of stroke in a subset of patients classified as having cryptogenic stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 24, 2003; revision received August 20, 2003; accepted September 10, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sacco RL, Ellenberg JH, Mohr JP, Tatemichi TK, Hier DB, Price TR, Wolf PA. Infarcts of undetermined cause: the NINCDS Stroke Data Bank. Ann Neurol. 1989; 25: 382390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Cabanes L, Mas JL, Cohen A, Amarenco P, Cabanes PA, Oubary P, Chedru F, Guerin F, Bousser MG, de Recondo J. Atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale as risk factors for cryptogenic stroke in patients less than 55 years of age: a study using transesophageal echocardiography. Stroke. 1993; 24: 18651873.
4. Overell JR, Bone I, Lees KR. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurology. 2000; 55: 11721179.
5. Pezzini A, Del Zotto E, Magoni M, Costa A, Archetti S, Grassi M, Akkawi NM, Albertini A, Assanelli D, Vignolo LA, Padovani A. Inherited thrombophilic disorders in young adults with ischemic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2833.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Steiner MM, Di Tullio MR, Rundek T, Gan R, Chen X, Liguori C, Brainin M, Homma S, Sacco RL. Patent foramen ovale size and embolic brain imaging findings among patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998; 29: 944948.
7. Falk RH. PFO or UFO? The role of a patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Am Heart J. 1991; 121: 12641266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Modan B, Sharon E, Jelin N. Factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease. Chest. 1972; 62: 388393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Corrin B. Paradoxical embolism. Br Heart J. 1964; 26: 549553.
10. Johnson BI. Paradoxical emboli. J Clin Pathol. 1951; 4: 316332.
11. Spritzer CE, Arata MA, Freed KS. Isolated pelvic deep venous thrombosis: relative frequency as detected with MR imaging. Radiology. 2001; 219: 521525.
12. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, Owen RS, Carpenter JT, Cope C. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1993; 18: 734741.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Evans AJ, Sostoman HD, Knelson MH, Spritzer CE, Newman GE, Paine SS, Beam CA. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 131139.
14. Dupas B, el Kouri D, Curtet C, Peltier P, de Faucal P, Planchon B, Lejeune JJ. Angiomagnetic resonance imaging of iliofemorocaval venous thrombosis. Lancet. 1995; 346: 1719.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Stern JB, Abehsera M, Grenet D, Friard S, Couderc LJ, Scherrer A, Stern M. Detection of pelvic vein thrombosis by magnetic resonance angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and normal lower limb compression ultrasonography. Chest. 2002; 122: 115121.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001; 219: 498502.
17. Cramer SC, Rordorf G, Kaufman JA, Buonanno F, Koroshetz WJ, Schwamm L. Clinically occult pelvic-vein thrombosis in cryptogenic stroke. Lancet. 1998; 351: 19271928.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Greer DM, Buonanno FS. Cerebral infarction in conjunction with patent foramen ovale and May-Thurner syndrome. J Neuroimaging. 2001; 11: 432434.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Noser EA, Felberg RA, Alexandrov AV. Thrombolytic therapy in an adolescent ischemic stroke. J Child Neurol. 2001; 16: 286288.
20. Cramer SC, Maki JH, Waitches GM, DSouza N, Grotta JC, Burgin WS, Kramer LA. Paradoxical emboli from calf and pelvic veins in cryptogenic stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2003; 13: 218223.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. McCarthy ST, Turner JJ, Robertson D, Hawkey CJ, Macey DJ. Low-dose heparin as a prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after acute stroke. Lancet. 1977; 2: 800801.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Landi G, DAngelo A, Boccardi E, Candelise L, Mannuci PM, AMorabito, Orazio EN. Venous thromboembolism in acute stroke: prognostic importance of hypercoagulability. Arch Neurol. 1992; 49: 279283.
23. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 3541.
24. Spritzer CE, Trotter P, Sostman HD. Deep venous thrombosis: gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging changes over time: experience in 10 patients. Radiology. 1998; 208: 631639.
25. Landis RJ, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159174.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Gautier JC, Durr A, Koussa S, Lasault G, Grosgogeat T. Paradoxical cerebral embolism with a patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1991; 1: 193202.[CrossRef]
27. Ranoux D, Cohen A, Cabanes L, Amarenco P, Bousser MG, Mas JL. Patent foramen ovale: is stroke due to paradoxical embolism? Stroke. 1993; 24: 3134.
28. Lethen H, Flachskampf FA, Schneider R, Sliwka U, Kohn G, Noth J, Hanrath P. Frequency of deep vein thrombosis in patients with patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 10661069.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Stollberger C, Slany J, Schuster I, Leitner H, Winkler WB, Karnik R. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119: 461465.
30. Stollberger C, Finsterer J, Slany J. Why is venous thrombosis only rarely detected in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism? Thromb Res. 2002; 105: 189191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis R, Hunt BJ. Venous thromboembolism after acute stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32: 262267.
32. Dorfman GS, Cronan JJ. Venous ultrasonography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 879893.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Bergqvist D, Bergentz S-E. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. World J Surg. 1990; 14: 679687.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Reed SD, Cramer SC, Blough DK, Meyer K, Jarvik JG. Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator and inpatient mortality rates for patients with ischemic stroke treated in community hospitals. Stroke. 2001; 32: 18321840.
35. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 8998.
36. Puls R, Hosten N, Bock JS, Oellinger JH, Lemke AJ, Gutberlet M, Holz K, Felix R. Signal-enhanced color Doppler sonography of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis. J Ultrasound Med. 1999; 18: 185190.[Abstract]
37. Obernosterer A, Aschauer M, Schnedl W, Lipp RW. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava in patients with iliac venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 3741.
38. Gin KG, Huckell VF, Pollick C. Femoral vein delivery of contrast medium enhances transthoracic echocardiographic detection of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 19942000.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-R. Clergeau, M. Hamon, R. Morello, E. Saloux, F. Viader, and M. Hamon Silent Cerebral Infarcts in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism and a Patent Foramen Ovale: A Prospective Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): 3758 - 3762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rajamani, S. Chaturvedi, Z. Jin, S. Homma, R. L. Brey, B. C. Tilley, R. L. Sacco, J.L.P. Thompson, J.P. Mohr, S. R. Levine, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale, Cardiac Valve Thickening, and Antiphospholipid Antibodies as Risk Factors for Subsequent Vascular Events: The PICSS-APASS Study Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2337 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Kiernan, B. P. Yan, R. J. Cubeddu, P. Rengifo-Moreno, V. Gupta, I. Inglessis, M. Ning, Z. N. Demirjian, M. R. Jaff, F. S. Buonanno, et al. May-Thurner Syndrome in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale: An Important Clinical Association Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1502 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rodes-Cabau, M. Noel, A. Marrero, D. Rivest, A. Mackey, C. Houde, E. Bedard, E. Larose, S. Verreault, M. Peticlerc, et al. Atherosclerotic Burden Findings in Young Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With and Without a Patent Foramen Ovale Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker and B. Meier Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: To Close or Not to Close? Closure: What Else! Circulation, November 4, 2008; 118(19): 1989 - 1997. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Doufekias, A. Z. Segal, and J. R. Kizer Cardiogenic and aortogenic brain embolism. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1049 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N U Weir An update on cardioembolic stroke Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 84(989): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Austin, H. Cohen, and N. Losseff Haematology and neurology J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 78(4): 334 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Di Tullio, R. L. Sacco, R. R. Sciacca, Z. Jin, and S. Homma Patent Foramen Ovale and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in a Multiethnic Population J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2007; 49(7): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bedard, J. Rodes-Cabau, C. Houde, A. Mackey, D. Rivest, S. Cloutier, M. Noel, A. Marrero, J.-M. Cote, P. Chetaille, et al. Enhanced Thrombogenesis but Not Platelet Activation Is Associated With Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 100 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Kizer and R. B. Devereux Clinical practice. Patent foramen ovale in young adults with unexplained stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., December 1, 2005; 353(22): 2361 - 2372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hara, R. Virmani, E. Ladich, S. Mackey-Bojack, J. Titus, M. Reisman, W. Gray, M. Nakamura, M. Mooney, A. Poulose, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale: Current Pathology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Status J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2005; 46(9): 1768 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cakmak, N. Nighoghossian, V. Desestret, M. Hermier, S. Cartalat-Carel, L. Derex, J. Honnorat, and P. Trouillas Pulmonary embolism: An unusual complication of cerebral venous thrombosis Neurology, October 11, 2005; 65(7): 1136 - 1137. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Homma and R. L. Sacco Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 1063 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Bushnell and L. B. Goldstein Risk of ischemic stroke with tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer: A meta-analysis Neurology, October 12, 2004; 63(7): 1230 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker, A. Wahl, K. Nedeltchev, M. Arnold, M. Schwerzmann, C. Seiler, H. P. Mattle, and B. Meier Comparison of medical treatment with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 750 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Blackshear Closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: Ready or not, here come the trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 759 - 761. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Spritzer Progress in MR Imaging of the Venous System Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2002; 21(2): 105 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |