| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:79.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Stroke Treatment Team (M.R., Z.G., K.U., J.S., A.V.A.), Medical School, The University of Texas-Houston, and Cerebrovascular Unit (M.R., C.A.M.), Hospital Vall dHebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Correspondence to Dr Marc Ribo, Unidad Neurovascular, Servicio de Neurología (9a planta hospital general), Hospital Vall dHebron, Pg Vall dHebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail marcriboj{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We prospectively evaluated patients with acute vertebrobasilar ischemia using PMD-TCD. Using a predefined set of TCD depth criteria and specific flow findings, occlusion was localized to the proximal, middle, or distal BA stem. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to measure stroke severity and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) to assess outcome at 3 months.
Results BA occlusion was diagnosed in 16 patients (3 women, mean age 65, median NIHSS 8, mean time from symptoms onset 8.5 hours). PMD-TCD diagnosis of BA occlusion was confirmed in 11 of 12 patients who underwent invasive angiography. Reversed BA flow on PMD-TCD was identified in 8 patients (50%). Angiography confirmed flow from carotid system in 6 of these 8 patients (
=0.87). Patients with reversed BA flow showed lower NIHSS scores on admission (median 4 versus 15.5, P=0.009), on discharge (2 versus 21.5, P=0.03) and did not experience neurological deterioration during hospital stay (n=0 versus 4, P=0.05). There was a trend toward better outcome at 3 months (mRS 1 versus 4, P=0.07).
Conclusion Detection of reversed flow in the distal BA with PMD-TCD is associated with lower stroke severity and better outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion.
Key Words: basilar artery ischemia power-motion Doppler stroke ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angiographic findings of length of BA occlusion or state of collaterals have previously been shown as potential predictors of outcome.10 Transcranial Doppler sonography has also been used to confirm or exclude acute basilar occlusion; however, its reliability compared with other imaging techniques has been questioned.4,15 Power-motion Doppler (PMD-TCD or M-mode), invented by Moehring and Spencer,16 displays the artery flow at multiple depths and allows detection of acute occlusions in the anterior circulation with excellent agreement with invasive angiography.17 The usefulness of PMD-TCD for diagnosis of basilar occlusion is still not validated.
The aim of our study is to validate the use of PMD-TCD for detection of acute basilar occlusion and reversed flow in the basilar artery as a sign of good collateral flow.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On arrival in the emergency department, patients underwent standard clinical, neurological, and cardiologic examination; ECG; blood chemistry; and noncontrast CT. A complete PMD-TCD examination to assess the intracranial arteries patency status was performed using a standard scanning protocol18 (Figure 1). BA segments were defined according to insonation depth as proximal (<85 mm), mid (85 to 95 mm), and distal (>95 mm). We used TCD 100 U by Spencer Technologies. An experienced sonographer (A.V.A., Z.G.) identified reversed BA flow as a low-resistance signal directed toward the probe between the depths of 80 to 100 mm in the absence of antegrade basilar flow signals. If extracranial ultrasound examination confirmed the absence of any significant stenosis or hypoechoic plaques in carotid arteries, carotid tapping could be performed to confirm anterior circulation flow (Figure 2). Presumed thrombus location and residual flow signals were determined by the presence of abnormal flow signals using the Thrombolysis In Brain Ischemia (TIBI)19 flow grading system. Complete occlusion was considered when TIBI grades were 0 to 1. Location of occlusion was determined: proximal, mid, and distal.
|
|
We obtained a detailed history of vascular risk factors from each patient. Urgent CT angiography, MRI/MR angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed shortly after PMD-TCD examination when clinically indicated. DSA with selective injection of the common carotid and vertebral arteries was performed with femoral artery approach. Sites of segmental BA occlusion were classified according to Archer and Horenstein anatomy-based criteria20: proximal, from the vertebral artery junction to the origin of the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries; mid, from the origin of the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries to the origin of the superior cerebellar arteries; and distal, at the top of the BA. Reversed flow in BA was identified when injection of contrast in the carotid arteries allowed visualization of collateral flow in the distal BA.
Patients were treated according to standard guidelines with intravenous, intraarterial or combined intravenous/intraarterial. tPA; experimental intraarterial interventions were performed when consented patients were eligible according to Institutional Review Boardapproved research protocol.
Neurological status was assessed on patients arrival and discharge from hospital using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) by a neurologist who was not aware of the purposes of this study. Neurological deterioration or improvement was defined as an increase or decrease of
4 points on the NIHSS score. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess clinical outcome at 90 days. We defined poor outcome as mRS
3 points or death.
Statistical analysis was performed with the use of the software Analyze-it 1.67. Statistical significance for intergroup differences were assessed by the 2-tailed Fishers exact test or
2 test for categorical variables and Students t test or Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. A level of P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Agreement between PMD-TCD and DSA was assessed with Cohens
statistic. Values between 0.4 and 0.8 indicated a moderate agreement; values >0.8 were considered excellent; and perfect value was 1.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reversed flow in BA was detected in 8 patients with PMD-TCD. Seven patients (87.5%) presented a proximal occlusion, 1 patient (12.5%) a mid occlusion, and none of them presented a distal BA occlusion. No differences could be observed in the retrograde-flow Doppler spectrum according to occlusion location. Six of these patients underwent DSA. In all of them, reversed BA flow from carotid system was confirmed. One of the remaining 2 patients underwent MRA that confirmed the presence of reversed flow in BA. Angiographic imaging did not show reversed BA flow in any of the remaining patients (
=0.87).
Patients with reversed basilar flow on PMD-TCD showed lower NIHSS scores on admission (median, 4 versus 16; P=0.009) and on discharge (2 versus 22; P=0.03) and were less likely to present neurological deterioration (n=0 versus 4; P=0.05) or poor outcome (mRS at 3 months, 1 versus 4; P=0.07) (Table).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies showed limited feasibility and low sensitivity of TCD in BA occlusion compared with CT angiography.15 Because of its ability to simultaneously display the power and direction of the blood flow signatures over a wide range of depth, PMD-TCD facilitates location of transcranial window and rapid vessel identification16 and thus may be useful in detection of distal basilar flow. The screening of a wide range of depths also permits simultaneously display of the flow patterns in proximal and distal BA, showing at the same time the occlusion signatures and the reversal flow (Figure 2).
It seems counterintuitive that a reversed flow distal to occlusion has low resistance. This reversed flow develops because of a pressure gradient. During a cardiac cycle, there is never enough pressure to push flow into a completely occluded vessel. However, if occlusion develops in the proximal basilar, a pressure gradient develops between carotid circulation and posterior cerebral arteries, superior cerebellar arteries, and perforating vessels. If a thrombus or embolus in the proximal BA does not completely occlude basilar all the way immediately, the patient has a chance to recruit posterior communicating arteries and deliver blood from carotids via the reversed basilar stem to parts of the cerebellum and smaller distal basilar branches. This collateral flow reaches the low-resistance system of cerebellar and brain stem parenchyma, and that is why it has good diastolic frequencies and low-resistance signatures on Doppler. Identification of low-resistance flow moving toward the probe, ie, reversed basilar at 80 to 100 mm, thus indicates continuing perfusion of vital brain structures and explains often partial deficits despite the presence of a proximal basilar obstruction.
Previous studies demonstrated that length of basilar occlusion and state of collaterals determined by DSA are independent variables affecting survival.10 Our study showed that similar information can be obtained rapidly and noninvasively. Identification of reversed flow in distal BA with PMD-TCD was associated with lower baseline stroke severity and better outcome. On the other hand, in patients in whom collateral flow cannot be established after acute BA occlusion, stroke severity and risk of neurological deterioration are higher. PMD-TCD can demonstrate favorable collateralization of flow, despite persistence of arterial occlusion, through posterior communicating arteries or even cross-cerebellar flow in some other cases. This information can explain heterogeneity of clinical syndromes associated with BA occlusion and may provide some insights as to how patients respond to intraarterial rescue or conservative management. PMD-TCD is intended not to replace other angiographic imaging techniques but to offer a wider diagnostic arsenal available for the physician in the acute management of suspected BA occlusion.
There are some potential limitations related to the application of PMD-TCD. First, although this procedure seems to improve some limitations of conventional TCD in obtaining a proper sonographic window, this technology is still likely to require skilled operators. The presence of other retrograde-flow signatures such as venous vessels or the superior cerebellar arteries could be misinterpreted by an inexperienced technician as a reversed BA flow. The absence of an antegrade arterial flow, the presence of a proximal signal compatible with BA occlusion, and a positive carotid tapping test help to rule out pitfalls. Second, because of the design of this study, real sensitivity of PMD-TCD in detection of BA occlusion compared with DSA cannot be assessed. New prospective studies with different inclusion criteria should be initiated to answer this question. In addition, the capability of this new system to assess very relevant issues in terms of clinical outcome as the length of the retrograde perfused portion or the length of the occlusion should also be tested.
In conclusion, identification of reversed flow in distal BA with PMD-TCD can be accurately performed at bedside, and this finding is associated with lower stroke severity and better outcomes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 2, 2003; revision received August 12, 2003; accepted September 16, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Biemond A. Thrombosis of the basilar artery and the vascularization of the brain stem. Brain. 1951; 74: 300317.
3. Caplan LR, Rosenbaum AE. Role of cerebral angiography in vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975; 38: 60112.
4. Ringelstein EB, Zeumer H, Poeck K. Non-invasive diagnosis of intracranial lesions in the vertebrobasilar system: a comparison of Doppler sonographic and angiographic findings. Stroke. 1985; 16: 848855.
5. Knauth M, von Kummer R, Jansen O, Hahnel S, Dorfler A, Sartor K. Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18: 10011010.[Abstract]
6. Katz DA, Marks MP, Napel SA, Bracci PM, Roberts SL. Circle of Willis: evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 1995; 195: 445449.
7. Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Relationship between findings of conventional and contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded real-time sonography and angiography in patients with basilar artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 568571.
8. Caplan LR. Occlusion of the vertebral or basilar artery: follow up analysis of some patients with benign outcome. Stroke. 1979; 10: 277282.
9. Brandt T, Steinke W, Thie A, Pessin MS, Caplan LR. Posterior cerebral artery territory infarcts: clinical features, infarct topography, causes and outcome: multicenter results and a review of the literature. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10: 17082.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Brandt T, von Kummer R, Muller-Kuppers M, Hacke W. Thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: variables affecting recanalization and outcome. Stroke. 1996; 27: 875881.
11. Grond M, Rudolf J, Schmulling S, Stenzel C, Neveling M, Heiss WD. Early intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55: 466469.
12. Brandt T. Diagnosis and thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: a review. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002; 24: 611622.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Ultrasonographic prediction of patients outcome in hyperacute ischemic stroke. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002; 15: 18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Alexandrov AV, Felberg RA, Demchuk AM, Christou I, Burgin WS, Malkoff M, Wojner AW, Grotta JC. Deterioration following spontaneous improvement: sonographic findings in patients with acutely resolving symptoms of cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2000; 31: 915919.
15. Brandt T, Knauth M, Wildermuth S, Winter R, von Kummer R, Sartor K, Hacke W. CT angiography and Doppler sonography for emergency assessment in acute basilar artery ischemia. Stroke. 1999; 30: 606612.
16. Moehring MA, Spencer MP. Power M-mode Doppler (PMD) for observing cerebral blood flow and tracking emboli. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 4957.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Alexandrov AV. Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis for stroke: clinical significance. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002; 16: 131140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Alexandrov AV, Demchuk AM, Burgin WS. Insonation method and diagnostic flow signatures for transcranial power motion (M-mode) Doppler. J Neuroimaging. 2002; 12: 236244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Demchuk AM, Burgin WS, Christou I, Felberg RA, Barber PA, Hill MD, Alexandrov AV. Thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2001; 32: 8993.
20. Archer CR, Horenstein S. Basilar artery occlusion: clinical and radiological correlation. Stroke. 1977; 8: 383390.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Tsivgoulis, V. K. Sharma, S. L. Hoover, A. Y. Lao, A. A. Ardelt, M. D. Malkoff, and A. V. Alexandrov Applications and Advantages of Power Motion-Mode Doppler in Acute Posterior Circulation Cerebral Ischemia Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1197 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pagola, M. Ribo, J. Alvarez-Sabin, M. Lange, M. Rubiera, and C. A. Molina Timing of Recanalization After Microbubble-Enhanced Intravenous Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2931 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ribo, J. Alvarez-Sabin, J. Montaner, F. Romero, P. Delgado, M. Rubiera, R. Delgado-Mederos, and C. A. Molina Temporal Profile of Recanalization After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator: Selecting Patients for Rescue Reperfusion Techniques Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1000 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |