Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:79-82
Published online before print December 11, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000106760.25228.2C
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/79    most recent
01.STR.0000106760.25228.2Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ribo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexandrov, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ribo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexandrov, A. V.

(Stroke. 2004;35:79.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Detection of Reversed Basilar Flow With Power-Motion Doppler After Acute Occlusion Predicts Favorable Outcome

Marc Ribo, MD; Zsolt Garami, MD; Ken Uchino, MD; Joon Song, MD; Carlos A. Molina, MD Andrei V. Alexandrov, MD

From the Stroke Treatment Team (M.R., Z.G., K.U., J.S., A.V.A.), Medical School, The University of Texas-Houston, and Cerebrovascular Unit (M.R., C.A.M.), Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Correspondence to Dr Marc Ribo, Unidad Neurovascular, Servicio de Neurología (9a planta hospital general), Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Pg Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail marcriboj{at}hotmail.com


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Power-motion transcranial Doppler PMD-TCD is a new method for simultaneous display of flow at multiple depths. We aimed to determine clinical significance of PMD-TCD demonstration of reversed basilar flow in patients with basilar artery (BA) occlusion.

Methods— We prospectively evaluated patients with acute vertebrobasilar ischemia using PMD-TCD. Using a predefined set of TCD depth criteria and specific flow findings, occlusion was localized to the proximal, middle, or distal BA stem. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to measure stroke severity and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) to assess outcome at 3 months.

Results— BA occlusion was diagnosed in 16 patients (3 women, mean age 65, median NIHSS 8, mean time from symptoms onset 8.5 hours). PMD-TCD diagnosis of BA occlusion was confirmed in 11 of 12 patients who underwent invasive angiography. Reversed BA flow on PMD-TCD was identified in 8 patients (50%). Angiography confirmed flow from carotid system in 6 of these 8 patients ({kappa}=0.87). Patients with reversed BA flow showed lower NIHSS scores on admission (median 4 versus 15.5, P=0.009), on discharge (2 versus 21.5, P=0.03) and did not experience neurological deterioration during hospital stay (n=0 versus 4, P=0.05). There was a trend toward better outcome at 3 months (mRS 1 versus 4, P=0.07).

Conclusion— Detection of reversed flow in the distal BA with PMD-TCD is associated with lower stroke severity and better outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion.


Key Words: basilar artery ischemia • power-motion Doppler • stroke • ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Historically, acute basilar artery (BA) occlusion has been regarded as a rare event, leading to mostly fatal brain stem infarctions.1,2 However, with development of new imaging techniques,3–7 its identification became more frequent, pointing to potentially less malignant natural history.8,9 The benefit of thrombolytic therapy, if given early in selected patients, has been established as potentially lifesaving.10–12 Clinicians are seeking predictors for negative outcome10,13,14 to select patients for aggressive treatment. Reliable and quick diagnostic techniques are therefore necessary not only for fast confirmation of BA occlusion but also for identification of those patients at higher risk of poor outcome as candidates for interventional treatment.

Angiographic findings of length of BA occlusion or state of collaterals have previously been shown as potential predictors of outcome.10 Transcranial Doppler sonography has also been used to confirm or exclude acute basilar occlusion; however, its reliability compared with other imaging techniques has been questioned.4,15 Power-motion Doppler (PMD-TCD or M-mode), invented by Moehring and Spencer,16 displays the artery flow at multiple depths and allows detection of acute occlusions in the anterior circulation with excellent agreement with invasive angiography.17 The usefulness of PMD-TCD for diagnosis of basilar occlusion is still not validated.

The aim of our study is to validate the use of PMD-TCD for detection of acute basilar occlusion and reversed flow in the basilar artery as a sign of good collateral flow.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We selected consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent urgent ultrasound transcranial examination between September 2001 and February 2003. Those who presented baseline PMD-TCD documented BA occlusion were included into the study. We excluded patients whose time of onset was >24 hours.

On arrival in the emergency department, patients underwent standard clinical, neurological, and cardiologic examination; ECG; blood chemistry; and noncontrast CT. A complete PMD-TCD examination to assess the intracranial arteries’ patency status was performed using a standard scanning protocol18 (Figure 1). BA segments were defined according to insonation depth as proximal (<85 mm), mid (85 to 95 mm), and distal (>95 mm). We used TCD 100 U by Spencer Technologies. An experienced sonographer (A.V.A., Z.G.) identified reversed BA flow as a low-resistance signal directed toward the probe between the depths of 80 to 100 mm in the absence of antegrade basilar flow signals. If extracranial ultrasound examination confirmed the absence of any significant stenosis or hypoechoic plaques in carotid arteries, carotid tapping could be performed to confirm anterior circulation flow (Figure 2). Presumed thrombus location and residual flow signals were determined by the presence of abnormal flow signals using the Thrombolysis In Brain Ischemia (TIBI)19 flow grading system. Complete occlusion was considered when TIBI grades were 0 to 1. Location of occlusion was determined: proximal, mid, and distal.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Normal flow in basilar artery. Right, image shows ultrasound probe and beam path. Left, PMD-TCD display shows flow in BA away from the probe at all depths from 60 to 110 mm. Right bottom, TCD spectra were obtained from the mid basilar artery (90 mm).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Reversed distal basilar flow in a patient with proximal BA occlusion. Upper image, PMD-TCD display shows red signal in distal BA (94 to 101 mm), indicating reversed flow. Intermittent blue signal in proximal BA (60 to 75 mm) is highly suggestive of vessel occlusion. Lower image, TCD spectra with carotid tapping is performed (arrows), indicating that flow in BA responds to tapping of the anterior circulation vessel.

We obtained a detailed history of vascular risk factors from each patient. Urgent CT angiography, MRI/MR angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed shortly after PMD-TCD examination when clinically indicated. DSA with selective injection of the common carotid and vertebral arteries was performed with femoral artery approach. Sites of segmental BA occlusion were classified according to Archer and Horenstein anatomy-based criteria20: proximal, from the vertebral artery junction to the origin of the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries; mid, from the origin of the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries to the origin of the superior cerebellar arteries; and distal, at the top of the BA. Reversed flow in BA was identified when injection of contrast in the carotid arteries allowed visualization of collateral flow in the distal BA.

Patients were treated according to standard guidelines with intravenous, intraarterial or combined intravenous/intraarterial. tPA; experimental intraarterial interventions were performed when consented patients were eligible according to Institutional Review Board–approved research protocol.

Neurological status was assessed on patient’s arrival and discharge from hospital using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) by a neurologist who was not aware of the purposes of this study. Neurological deterioration or improvement was defined as an increase or decrease of >=4 points on the NIHSS score. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess clinical outcome at 90 days. We defined poor outcome as mRS >=3 points or death.

Statistical analysis was performed with the use of the software Analyze-it 1.67. Statistical significance for intergroup differences were assessed by the 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test or {chi}2 test for categorical variables and Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. A level of P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Agreement between PMD-TCD and DSA was assessed with Cohen’s {kappa} statistic. Values between 0.4 and 0.8 indicated a moderate agreement; values >0.8 were considered excellent; and perfect value was 1.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Of a total of 763 consecutive acute stroke patients who underwent emergent transcranial ultrasound examination, 73 (9.6%) presented with a posterior circulation stroke. Of these 16 (2.1%) had a documented BA occlusion on PMD-TCD (3 women; mean age, 65). Mean time from symptoms onset to ultrasound examination was 8.5 hours and median baseline NIHSS was 8 (range, 0 to 29) points. All TCD-PMD tests were performed and interpreted at bedside within 10 minutes after initiation of ultrasound examination. BA occlusion location was assessed: proximal, 9 patients (56.2%); mid, 4 patients (25%); and distal, 3 patients (18.8%) Of the total 16 patients, 12 underwent DSA, 3 were examined with MRA, and 1 did not receive any additional imaging. In 11 of the 12 patients who underwent DSA, basilar occlusion was confirmed. In the remaining patient who underwent DSA, the study revealed left posterior cerebral artery occlusion without evidence of BA occlusion. In this patient, intravenous tPA was initiated prior to angiography. For the 3 patients who underwent MRA, BA occlusion was also confirmed.

Reversed flow in BA was detected in 8 patients with PMD-TCD. Seven patients (87.5%) presented a proximal occlusion, 1 patient (12.5%) a mid occlusion, and none of them presented a distal BA occlusion. No differences could be observed in the retrograde-flow Doppler spectrum according to occlusion location. Six of these patients underwent DSA. In all of them, reversed BA flow from carotid system was confirmed. One of the remaining 2 patients underwent MRA that confirmed the presence of reversed flow in BA. Angiographic imaging did not show reversed BA flow in any of the remaining patients ({kappa}=0.87).

Patients with reversed basilar flow on PMD-TCD showed lower NIHSS scores on admission (median, 4 versus 16; P=0.009) and on discharge (2 versus 22; P=0.03) and were less likely to present neurological deterioration (n=0 versus 4; P=0.05) or poor outcome (mRS at 3 months, 1 versus 4; P=0.07) (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Demographic Data, Risk Factor Profile, and Baseline Clinical Findings


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study showed that PMD-TCD can be used for quick and reliable detection of BA occlusion and flow reversal in its distal portion. This finding indicates collateralization of flow through the posterior communicating arteries and accounts for lower NIHSS scores at baseline. These patients also had better outcomes at 3 months.

Previous studies showed limited feasibility and low sensitivity of TCD in BA occlusion compared with CT angiography.15 Because of its ability to simultaneously display the power and direction of the blood flow signatures over a wide range of depth, PMD-TCD facilitates location of transcranial window and rapid vessel identification16 and thus may be useful in detection of distal basilar flow. The screening of a wide range of depths also permits simultaneously display of the flow patterns in proximal and distal BA, showing at the same time the occlusion signatures and the reversal flow (Figure 2).

It seems counterintuitive that a reversed flow distal to occlusion has low resistance. This reversed flow develops because of a pressure gradient. During a cardiac cycle, there is never enough pressure to push flow into a completely occluded vessel. However, if occlusion develops in the proximal basilar, a pressure gradient develops between carotid circulation and posterior cerebral arteries, superior cerebellar arteries, and perforating vessels. If a thrombus or embolus in the proximal BA does not completely occlude basilar all the way immediately, the patient has a chance to recruit posterior communicating arteries and deliver blood from carotids via the reversed basilar stem to parts of the cerebellum and smaller distal basilar branches. This collateral flow reaches the low-resistance system of cerebellar and brain stem parenchyma, and that is why it has good diastolic frequencies and low-resistance signatures on Doppler. Identification of low-resistance flow moving toward the probe, ie, reversed basilar at 80 to 100 mm, thus indicates continuing perfusion of vital brain structures and explains often partial deficits despite the presence of a proximal basilar obstruction.

Previous studies demonstrated that length of basilar occlusion and state of collaterals determined by DSA are independent variables affecting survival.10 Our study showed that similar information can be obtained rapidly and noninvasively. Identification of reversed flow in distal BA with PMD-TCD was associated with lower baseline stroke severity and better outcome. On the other hand, in patients in whom collateral flow cannot be established after acute BA occlusion, stroke severity and risk of neurological deterioration are higher. PMD-TCD can demonstrate favorable collateralization of flow, despite persistence of arterial occlusion, through posterior communicating arteries or even cross-cerebellar flow in some other cases. This information can explain heterogeneity of clinical syndromes associated with BA occlusion and may provide some insights as to how patients respond to intraarterial rescue or conservative management. PMD-TCD is intended not to replace other angiographic imaging techniques but to offer a wider diagnostic arsenal available for the physician in the acute management of suspected BA occlusion.

There are some potential limitations related to the application of PMD-TCD. First, although this procedure seems to improve some limitations of conventional TCD in obtaining a proper sonographic window, this technology is still likely to require skilled operators. The presence of other retrograde-flow signatures such as venous vessels or the superior cerebellar arteries could be misinterpreted by an inexperienced technician as a reversed BA flow. The absence of an antegrade arterial flow, the presence of a proximal signal compatible with BA occlusion, and a positive carotid tapping test help to rule out pitfalls. Second, because of the design of this study, real sensitivity of PMD-TCD in detection of BA occlusion compared with DSA cannot be assessed. New prospective studies with different inclusion criteria should be initiated to answer this question. In addition, the capability of this new system to assess very relevant issues in terms of clinical outcome as the length of the retrograde perfused portion or the length of the occlusion should also be tested.

In conclusion, identification of reversed flow in distal BA with PMD-TCD can be accurately performed at bedside, and this finding is associated with lower stroke severity and better outcomes.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank all the members of the Stroke Treatment Team at the University of Texas-Houston who made this study possible.

Received July 2, 2003; revision received August 12, 2003; accepted September 16, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Kubik CS, Adams RD. Occlusion of the basilar artery: a clinical and pathological study. Brain. 1946; 59: 73–121.

2. Biemond A. Thrombosis of the basilar artery and the vascularization of the brain stem. Brain. 1951; 74: 300–317.[Free Full Text]

3. Caplan LR, Rosenbaum AE. Role of cerebral angiography in vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975; 38: 601–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Ringelstein EB, Zeumer H, Poeck K. Non-invasive diagnosis of intracranial lesions in the vertebrobasilar system: a comparison of Doppler sonographic and angiographic findings. Stroke. 1985; 16: 848–855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Knauth M, von Kummer R, Jansen O, Hahnel S, Dorfler A, Sartor K. Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18: 1001–1010.[Abstract]

6. Katz DA, Marks MP, Napel SA, Bracci PM, Roberts SL. Circle of Willis: evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 1995; 195: 445–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Relationship between findings of conventional and contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded real-time sonography and angiography in patients with basilar artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 568–571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Caplan LR. Occlusion of the vertebral or basilar artery: follow up analysis of some patients with benign outcome. Stroke. 1979; 10: 277–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Brandt T, Steinke W, Thie A, Pessin MS, Caplan LR. Posterior cerebral artery territory infarcts: clinical features, infarct topography, causes and outcome: multicenter results and a review of the literature. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10: 170–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Brandt T, von Kummer R, Muller-Kuppers M, Hacke W. Thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: variables affecting recanalization and outcome. Stroke. 1996; 27: 875–881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Grond M, Rudolf J, Schmulling S, Stenzel C, Neveling M, Heiss WD. Early intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1998; 55: 466–469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Brandt T. Diagnosis and thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: a review. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002; 24: 611–622.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Koga M, Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Ultrasonographic prediction of patients’ outcome in hyperacute ischemic stroke. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002; 15: 1–8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Alexandrov AV, Felberg RA, Demchuk AM, Christou I, Burgin WS, Malkoff M, Wojner AW, Grotta JC. Deterioration following spontaneous improvement: sonographic findings in patients with acutely resolving symptoms of cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2000; 31: 915–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Brandt T, Knauth M, Wildermuth S, Winter R, von Kummer R, Sartor K, Hacke W. CT angiography and Doppler sonography for emergency assessment in acute basilar artery ischemia. Stroke. 1999; 30: 606–612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Moehring MA, Spencer MP. Power M-mode Doppler (PMD) for observing cerebral blood flow and tracking emboli. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 49–57.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Alexandrov AV. Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis for stroke: clinical significance. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002; 16: 131–140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Alexandrov AV, Demchuk AM, Burgin WS. Insonation method and diagnostic flow signatures for transcranial power motion (M-mode) Doppler. J Neuroimaging. 2002; 12: 236–244.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Demchuk AM, Burgin WS, Christou I, Felberg RA, Barber PA, Hill MD, Alexandrov AV. Thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2001; 32: 89–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Archer CR, Horenstein S. Basilar artery occlusion: clinical and radiological correlation. Stroke. 1977; 8: 383–390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Tsivgoulis, V. K. Sharma, S. L. Hoover, A. Y. Lao, A. A. Ardelt, M. D. Malkoff, and A. V. Alexandrov
Applications and Advantages of Power Motion-Mode Doppler in Acute Posterior Circulation Cerebral Ischemia
Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1197 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Pagola, M. Ribo, J. Alvarez-Sabin, M. Lange, M. Rubiera, and C. A. Molina
Timing of Recanalization After Microbubble-Enhanced Intravenous Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2931 - 2934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Ribo, J. Alvarez-Sabin, J. Montaner, F. Romero, P. Delgado, M. Rubiera, R. Delgado-Mederos, and C. A. Molina
Temporal Profile of Recanalization After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator: Selecting Patients for Rescue Reperfusion Techniques
Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1000 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/79    most recent
01.STR.0000106760.25228.2Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ribo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexandrov, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ribo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alexandrov, A. V.