Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:2592-2597
Published online before print October 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000144646.96121.d2
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/2592    most recent
01.STR.0000144646.96121.d2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijn, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke

(Stroke. 2004;35:2592.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Angiotensinogen Promoter B-Haplotype Associated With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Enhances Basal Transcriptional Activity

Helena Schmidt, MD MSc; Yurii S. Aulchenko, PhD; Natascha Schweighofer, MSc; Reinhold Schmidt, MD; Sasa Frank, PhD; Gerhard M. Kostner, PhD; Erwin Ott, MD Cornelia van Duijn, MD

From the Institute of Medical Molecular Biology and Biochemistry (H.S., N.S., S.F., G.M.K.), and the Department of Neurology (R.S., E.O.), Medical University of Graz, Austria; and the Genetic Epidemiology Unit (Y.S.A., C.v.D.), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr Helena Schmidt, Institute of Medical Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, Harrachgasse 21, 8010 Graz, Austria. E-mail helena.schmidt{at}uni-graz.at


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Previously, we described the presence of 5 haplotypes (A to E) at the angiotensinogen (AGT) promoter and reported a significant association between the B-haplotype (nucleotide substitutions –6:G->A and –20:A->C compared with the wild-type A-haplotype) and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). The association was independent of hypertension, suggesting a brain-specific effect of this haplotype. In the current study, we investigated transcriptional activities of the 5 promoter haplotypes in astrocytes, the main source of cerebral AGT, and in hepatocytes, the main source of systemic AGT, as well as determined the evolutionary relatedness of the promoter haplotypes.

Methods— Transcriptional activity depending on the haplotypes and the –6:A and –20:C substitutions was measured in transiently transfected A172 and HepG2 cells. We genotyped 5 new single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the AGT gene and measured linkage disequilibrium (LD) among SNPs and the promoter haplotypes. An evolution-based haplotype tree was constructed.

Results— The B-haplotype increased transcriptional activity in both cell types. Its effect was stronger in astrocytes than in hepatocytes (2.4±0.09-fold, P<0.001 versus 1.6±0.06-fold, P=0.014). Importantly, in astrocytes the combination of the –6:A and the –20:C was mandatory for increased activity, whereas in hepatocytes the –20:C on its own was sufficient. Strong LD between the 5 new SNPs and the promoter haplotypes allowed the reconstruction of 9 haplotypes over the AGT gene. Cladistic analyses suggest that the B-haplotype represents an ancient promoter variant.

Conclusions— Combination of the –6:A and –20:C substitutions in the B-haplotype may promote the development of cSVD by enhancing cerebral angiotensinogen expression.


Key Words: angiotensinogen • gene expression regulation • genetics • white matter


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cerebral small-vessel disease (cSVD) is an important cause of stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia.1–2 cSVD can be visualized by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain as early confluent and confluent white matter hyperintensities and lacunar infarcts. The estimated heritability of cSVD is 73%, suggesting that genetic factors play an important causative role.3 Arterial hypertension is the major risk factor for cSVD, which also has a high heritability in most populations.4

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an important regulator of blood pressure. Plasma angiotensinogen (AGT) synthesized by the liver is processed to angiotensin II (AT-II) by the serial action of renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme. Liver production of AGT is regulated mainly at the transcriptional level.5–6 Sequence alterations at position –6 and –20 have been shown to affect transcriptional efficiency of the promoter.7–11 There is a positive correlation between plasma AGT concentration, RAS activity, and blood pressure.5,6,12,13 The AGT gene has been implicated in hypertension by association and linkage studies.13–15

Previously, we described 5 haplotypes (A wild-type to E) at the AGT promoter created by nucleotide substitutions at positions –6, –20, –152, and –217 relative to the transcription start (Figure 1).16 Homozygosity for the B-haplotype (–6:A, –20:C, –152:G, –217:G) conferred an 8-fold increased risk for cSVD in our cohort. The association was independent of hypertension, suggesting that the effect of the haplotype is mediated through the local RAS of the brain rather than through the systemic RAS.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of the transcriptional activities of AGT promoter haplotypes in astrocytes and hepatocytes. A, Position and nucleotide sequences at polymorphic sites in the promoter haplotypes (–1222 to +44). B, Transcriptional activities of the promoter haplotypes in HepG2 cells (dark bars) and A172 cells (white bars). Transcriptional activities are presented as percentage of the activity of the A-haplotype. Each measurement was performed in triplicates and repeated in at least 3 independent experiments. Values are the means±SEM. Transcriptional activities of the B-, C-, D-, and E-haplotypes were compared with the A-haplotype pairwise (Student t test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; NS indicates not significant).

The B-haplotype differs from the wild-type A at positions –6 (G->A) and at –20 (A->C). We hypothesize that either one of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or their combination alters promoter activity of the AGT gene in the brain, which may then promote development of cSVD through increased cerebral RAS activity. To test this hypothesis, we investigated AGT promoter activity dependent on the promoter haplotypes and on the single –6:A and –20:C substitutions in astrocytes, which represent the major source of cerebral AGT, and in hepatocytes, which represent the major source of systemic AGT.5

Because it is also possible that the association between the B-haplotype and cSVD is not functional but is rather caused by linkage disequilibrium (LD), we genotyped 5 additional sequence variations scattered over the AGT gene and estimated the magnitude of LD between the new SNPs and the promoter haplotypes. Based on these data, we performed a cladistic analysis and investigated the evolutionary relatedness of the haplotypes.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
A172 cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 4.5 g/L glucose, 100 000 U/L penicillin, and 0.1 g/L streptomycin, and HepG2 cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, 100 000 U/L penicillin, and 0.1 g/L streptomycin.

Construction of Plasmids
Genomic DNA from subjects homozygous for the A-, B-, C-, D-, or E-haplotypes was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between positions –1222 and +44 (AF424741) and cloned into XhoI/HindIII sites of the pGL3-basic reporter vector (Promega) upstream of the firefly luciferase gene.

The reporter vector including the A-haplotype was used to introduce the –6:A (MutAB-6) and the –20:C substitutions (MutAB-20) by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. To introduce the –6:A mutation, a fragment spanning positions –120 to +10 (primers: 5'-GATCCCAGCCTGTGGTCTGGCCAAGTGA-3' and 5'-AGCAGCTTCTTCCCCTGGCC-3') and a fragment spanning positions –53 to +44 (primers 5'-GCTCCATCCCCACCCCTCA-3' and 5'-ATTTAAAGCTTCGGCTTACCTTCTGCTGTAG-3') were created. The 2 fragments were then combined by amplification with the primers 5'-GATCCCAGCCTGTGGTCTGGCCAAGTGA-3' and 5'-ATTTAAAGCTTCGGCTTACCTTCTGCTGTAG-3'. The –20:C mutation was introduced similarly except that a fragment spanning position –120 to –14 was created in the first step (primers 5'-GATCCCAGCCTGTGGTCTGGCCAAGTGA-3' and 5'-TCACGAGGCCCTATTTATAGCTGAG-3'). The combined fragments were subcloned into the PflMI/HindIII sites of the plasmid carrying the A-haplotype. All inserts were verified by DNA sequencing.

Transient Transfection Assays
Cells were plated at a density of 4x105 cells/60-mm dish and transfected 24 hours later by calcium phosphate coprecipitation with the reporter constructs (10 µg). In each experiment, phRG-TK control plasmid (20 ng) was cotransfected to normalize for transfection efficiency. Luciferase activity was measured 48 hours after transfection using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) on a LUMAT LB9501 luminometer (Berthold). All measurements were performed in triplicate and have been repeated in at least 3 independent experiments. Results are expressed as the ratio of firefly to renilla luciferase activity (±SEM). Statistical significance was tested by the Student t test and 1-way ANOVA (SPSS for Windows 10.0.5.0).

Subjects and Design
The study population consisted of participants of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study, a single-center, prospective, follow-up study on the cerebral effects of vascular risk factors in the normal elderly population of Graz, Austria. Study design, sampling procedure, and definition of vascular risk factors have been previously described.16,17 The present study consisted of those 662 individuals who underwent both magnetic resonance imaging analyses and DNA sampling. There were 357 women and 305 men. The mean age was 63.1 years. The sample consisted exclusively of whites of central European origin. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Graz. All subjects gave informed consent to participate in the study.

Mutation Screening and Genotyping
We screened the promoter region upstream of the haplotypes (positions –704 to –245bp) and the 3'-UTR (positions +11407 to +11712bp) for SNPs. Genomic DNA was PCR-amplified using the oligonucleotides: fragment 1 (spanning position –532): 5'-GC-clamp-GGTCATGTGAAACTTACCATTTGC-3' and 5'-CAAAGAGCCTACCCTGTGCAAAG; fragment 2 (spanning position –386): 5'-GC-clamp-AAGTTTGCAGGAGTCGGGGCCAAG and 5'-GCTGAAGGTCACACATCCCATGAGC; and fragment 3 (spanning positions +11407 and +11712bp):5'-GC-clamp-CACCTAAAACTTCAAAGGACTGC-3' and 5'-CATTGCCTTCGGTTTGTATTTAG-3'. The sequence of the GC-clamp was 5'-CGCCCGCCGCGCCCCGCGCCCGGCCCGCCGCCCCCGCCCG-3'. PCR products were screened for the presence of mutations by TTGE (Dcode Universal mutation detection system; Bio-Rad Laboratories). Melting domain map was calculated with the MacMelt algorithm (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Heterozygous DNA samples were used as positive controls on each gel to check gel resolution efficiency. At least 3 samples with a distinct banding pattern on TTGE were sequenced (CEQ 2000XL DNA analyses system; Beckman Coulter). The M235T polymorphism was genotyped using PCR-refraction fragment length polymorphism.18

Statistical Analysis
The haplotype tree was inferred with the maximum likelihood method, using DNAML 3.573c (Phylip; http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html).19 We assumed equal base frequency and a transition to transversion ratio of 2.0. Haplotype frequencies were estimated by the expectation-maximization method (Arlequin v. 2001; http://lgb.unige.ch/arlequin/).20

Pairwise LD was characterized by D' (normalized Lewontin measure of LD) and by the probability value from the test of significance of LD, and was estimated by GOLD software package (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/GOLD/).21,22 The relation between physical distance and LD was assessed using the booLD software (http://www.geneticepi.com/Research/software/software.html).23


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Transcriptional Activities of the Promoter Haplotypes
Basal transcriptional activities of the haplotypes in astrocytes (A172 cells) and hepatocytes (HepG2 cells) are shown in Figure 1. Among the 5 haplotypes, the B-haplotype had the highest promoter activity in both cell types (hepatocytes: 1.6±0.06-fold, P=0.014; astrocytes, 2.4±0.09-fold increase, P<0.001 compared with the A-haplotype). The C-haplotype showed similar promoter activity as the A-haplotype in hepatocytes (P=0.5) and a 1.5±0.09-fold increased activity in astrocytes (P=0.007). The D-haplotype decreased promoter activity by {approx}50% in both cell lines (HepG2, P=0.02; A172, P=0.003). The E-haplotype did not change promoter activity in hepatocytes (P=0.5) but decreased activity by {approx}30% in astrocytes (P=0.01).

Transcriptional Activities of the MutAB-6 and the MutAB-20 Constructs
To elucidate the individual effect of the –6:A and –20:C substitutions distinguishing the B-haplotype from the A-haplotype, we transiently transfected A172 and HepG2 cells with the reporter constructs containing either only the –6:A substitution (MutAB-6) or the –20:C substitution (MutAB-20) (Figure 2A). The promoter activities of these constructs were compared with the promoter activities of both the A- and B-haplotypes. In astrocytes, MutAB-6 had a significantly increased promoter activity (1.6±0.07-fold, P<0.001) compared with the A-haplotype, but its transcriptional activity was still significantly lower than that of the B-haplotype (P<0.001). MutAB-20 had similar promoter activity in astrocytes (P=0.3) as the A-haplotype. By contrast, in hepatocytes promoter activity of MutAB-6 was similar to that of the A-haplotype (P=0.2), whereas MutAB-20 had a 2.5±0.06-fold increased promoter activity (P<0.001) (Figure 2B). This is comparable with the effect of the B-haplotype in these cells (P=0.8)



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of the –6G and –20C substitutions on the transcriptional activities of AGT promoter in astrocytes and hepatocytes. A, Nucleotide sequences of the A- and B-haplotypes and of MutAB-6 and MutAB-20 constructs within the core promoter region (–25 to +8bp). Nucleotide exchanges in MutAB-6 and MutAB-20 are marked with a frame. The remaining sequence of MutAB-6 and MutAB-20 corresponds to that of the A-haplotype (–1222 to +44 bp). B, Promoter activities of the MutAB-6 and MutAB-20 constructs in HepG2 cells (dark bars) and A172 cells (white bars). Each measurement was performed in triplicate and repeated in at least 3 independent experiments. Transcriptional activities are presented as percentage of the A-haplotype activity (mean±SEM). The first probability value compares mutated constructs versus A-haplotype, and the second probability value compares mutated constructs versus B-haplotype (Student t test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; NS indicates not significant).

Pairwise LD and Haplotype Analyses
We genotyped our cohort for the SNPs –532C->T and –386G->A in the promoter region, and for the SNPs +11535:C->A and +11553C->delC in the 3'-UTR as well as for the M235T polymorphism. Allele and genotype proportions for all the SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Table 1). The allele frequencies in our cohort were similar to the previously published frequencies in a sample of white subjects (Utah CEPH pedigrees) (Table 1).24


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Distribution of the AGT Polymorphisms

The magnitude of LD among the SNPs is shown in Figure 3. There was no decline of LD with physical distance (constant LD versus exponential decline models, P>0.1). Average LD between the SNPs as assessed by D' was 0.841.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Pairwise LD in AGT, evaluated by D' (left) and minus logarithm of the probability value coming from the test of LD significance (right).

Including the 5 newly investigated SNPs and the 4 SNPs determining the promoter haplotypes, we inferred 9 haplotypes over the AGT gene in our cohort. These haplotypes coded from H1 to H9 based on their frequencies are described in Table 2. The evolutionary relatedness of these haplotypes in form of a haplotype tree is presented in Figure 4. Overall, 80% of the promoter B-haplotype was present on H4, 12% on H8, and 8% on H9, both closely related to H4. The H4 AGT haplotype is equivalent to the published chimpanzee sequence (AF193457.1), suggesting that the B-haplotype represents an ancient promoter variant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Frequencies of Haplotypes in the AGT Gene, as Estimated by the EM Algorithm



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Haplotype tree for AGT haplotypes, based on the 9 SNPs. The size of the circle corresponds to the frequency of the haplotype. The letter in the brackets shows the promoter haplotype carried.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the current study, we show that the AGT promoter B-haplotype, which was associated with cSVD in our previous investigation,16 significantly enhances basal transcriptional activity of the AGT gene. The association was independent of hypertension, indicating that it might be mediated through an altered cerebral AGT expression. We found that the B-haplotype increases promoter activity more strongly in astrocytes, which are the major source of cerebral AGT, than in hepatocytes, which are the major source of systemic AGT.

If tissue RAS is regulated at the AGT level as is the systemic RAS, then a higher AGT transcription in astrocytes may lead to elevated AT-II concentration in the brain. AT-II is a potent regulator of vascular tone,25,26 it promotes vascular smooth muscle cell growth, and modulates the production of extracellular matrix proteins.27–29 It enhances the activity of NADH/NADPH oxidase and of extracellular superoxide dismutase in the vessel wall.30,31 Alteration in the local availability of AT-II may therefore result in an imbalance of physiological processes such as brain perfusion, autoregulation of cerebral blood flow, the oxidative state of the vessel wall, or function of the blood–brain barrier,32 and by these mechanisms may lead to the development of cSVD.

The B-haplotype contains 2 nucleotide substitutions, –6:G->A and –20:A->C, compared with the wild-type A-haplotype. We found that in contrast to hepatocytes, the effect of the B-haplotype in astrocytes is dependent on the presence of both of these substitutions, because neither the –6:A nor the –20:C mutation alone was able to enhance promoter activity to the level observed for the B-haplotype. This is in line with our previous genetic epidemiological data, showing that the B-haplotype is stronger and more significantly associated with cSVD than either the –20:C or the –6:A alleles. An interaction between the –6:A and the –20:C mutation is biologically plausible because these 2 mutations are located in 2 distinct regulatory elements of the core promoter.9,11

The 5 promoter haplotypes showed a cell type-specific and differential effect on the transcriptional activity, suggesting that the effect of the –20:C and the –6:A mutations are further modulated by other sequence variations at the AGT promoter. This is in line with previous findings indicating that the sequence between positions –25 to –1 mediate the responsiveness of the core promoter to upstream cis-acting elements.8

A further, although indirect, support for the functional relevance of the B-haplotype is suggested by its ancient origin. It had been hypothesized that the AGT haplotype carrying the –6:A and the 235T mutations was advantageous during human evolution in the low-salt environment of Africa by allowing for a higher salt reabsorption through enhanced AGT expression and aldosterone secretion.13,24 When our ancestors moved to the high-salt environment in Europe, however, this ancient haplotype may have become disadvantageous. The B-haplotype is in complete LD with the 235T variant, and the enhanced risk for cSVD associated with 235T variant might be caused by LD with the B-haplotype.33 Importantly, although the B-haplotype contains the –6:A substitution and also perfectly predicts the presence of C at position 4072, which codes for the 235T variant, only 34% of the 235T allele is associated with the B-haplotype and may therefore enhance the risk for cSVD.

A strength of our study is that we investigated the effect of naturally occurring promoter haplotypes on the transcriptional activity of the AGT gene, and that we dissected the individual effect of the –6:A and –20:C mutations present on the B-haplotype. We used astrocytes as a cellular model for cerebral AGT expression. It is important to realize, however, that other cell types, like vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, or eventually neurons, may also contribute to AGT production at the site of cSVD.

In conclusion, we showed that the combination of the –6:A and –20:C mutations in the B-haplotype enhances angiotensinogen promoter activity in astrocyte. This finding together with our previous epidemiological data suggests that increased cerebral RAS activity is involved in the cause of cSVD. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of the B-haplotype in independent populations, and to elucidate the biological role of the SNPs at the AGT gene in cSVD. A causal relation between B-haplotype and cSVD independent of hypertension points to intervention in the RAS as a possible treatment strategy in cSVD, a highly prevalent entity in elderly subjects for which no treatment has been proven to be effective until now.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation P15440 (H.S.) and P13180-med (R.S.), by the Franz Lanyar Foundation of the University of Graz (H.S.), and by the Netherlands Heart Organization 2000B117 (C.v.D.). The excellent technical assistance of Irmgard Poelzl and Johann Semmler is appreciated.

Received May 6, 2004; revision received June 17, 2004; accepted July 5, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Pantoni L, Garcia J. The significance of cerebral white matter abnormalities 100 years after Binswanger’s report: a review. Stroke. 1995; 26: 1293–1301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Jones L, Warlow C. The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke. 1987; 18: 545–551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Carmelli D, DeCarli C, Swan G, Jack LM, Reed T, Wolf PA, Miller BL. Evidence for genetic variance in white matter hyperintensity volume in normal elderly male twins. Stroke. 1998; 29: 1177–1181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Snieder H, Harshfield GA, Treiber FA. Heritability of blood pressure and hemodynamics in African- and European-American youth. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 1196–1201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Lynch KR, Peach MJ. Molecular biology of angiotensinogen. Hypertension. 1991; 17: 263–269.[Free Full Text]

6. Kim HS, Krege JH, Kluckman KD, Hagaman JR, Hodgin JB, Best CF, Jenette JC, Coffman TM, Maeda N, Smithies O. Genetic control of blood pressure and the angiotensinogen locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 2735–2739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Fukamizu A, Takahashi S, Seo MS, Tada M, Tanimoto K, Uehara S, Murakami K. Structure and expression of the human angiotensinogen gene. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265: 7676–7682.

8. Yanai K, Nibu Y, Murakami K, Fukamizu A. A cis-Acting DNA Element located between TATA box and transcription initiation site is critical in response to regulatory sequences in human angiotensinogen gene. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 15981–15986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Yanai K, Saito T, Hirota K, Kobayashi H, Murakami K, Fukamizu A. Molecular variation of the human angiotensinogen core promoter element located between the TATA box and transcription initiation site affects its transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 30558–30562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Zhao YY, Zhou J, Narayanan CS, Cui Y, Kumar A. Role of C/A Polymorphism at -20 on the expression of human angiotensinogen gene. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 108–115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams CS, Quackenbush J, Puryear R, Powers M, Cheng T, Ludwig EH, Sharma AM, Hata A, Jeunemaitre X, Lalouel JM. A nucleotide substitution in the promoter of human angiotensinogen is associated with essential hypertension and affects basal transcription in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1786–1797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Murakami K, Fukamizu A. Transgenic and knockout models in renin-angiotensin system. Immunopharmacology. 1999; 44: 1–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM, et al. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992; 71: 169–180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Corvol P, Jeunemaitre X. Molecular genetics of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Endocrine Rev. 1997; 18: 662–677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Caulfield M, Lavender P, Farrall M, Munroe P, Lawson M, Turner P, Clark AJL. Linkage of the angiotensinogen gene to essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1629–1633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Schmidt H, Fazekas F, Kostner GM, Van Duijn CM, Schmidt R. Angiotensinogen gene promoter haplotype and microangiopathy-related cerebral damage. Stroke. 2001; 32: 405–412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Kapeller P, Schmidt H, Hartung HP. MRI white matter hyperintensities. Three-year follow-up of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study. Neurology. 1999; 53: 132–139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Russ AP, Maerz W, Ruzieka V, Stein U, Gross W. Rapid detection of the hypertension-associated Met235-Thr allele of the human angiotensinogen gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2: 609–610.[Free Full Text]

19. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics. 1989; 5: 164–166.

20. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetic Data. Geneva, Switzerland: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva; 2000.

21. Lewontin RC. The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics. 1964; 49: 49–67.[Free Full Text]

22. Abecasis GR, Cookson WO. GOLD-graphical overview of linkagedisequilibrium. Bioinformatics. 2000; 16: 182–183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Aulchenko YS, Axenovich TI, Mackay I, Van Duijn CM. MiLD and booLD programs for calculation and analysis of corrected linkage disequilibrium. Ann Hum Genet. 2003; 67: 372–375.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Nakajima T, Jorde LB, Ishigami T, Umemura S, Emi M, Lalouel J-M, Inoue I. Nucleotide diversity and haplotype structure of the human angiotensinogen gene in two populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 70: 108–123.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Whalley ET, Wahl M. Cerebrovascular reactivity to angiotensin and angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res. 1988; 438: 1–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Tamaki K, Saku Y, Ogata J. Effects of angiotensin and atrial natriuretic peptide on the cerebral circulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992; 12: 318–325.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Weber H, Taylor SD, Molloy CJ. Angiotensin II induces delayed mitogenesis and cellular proliferation in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93: 788–798.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Marrero MB, Schieffer B, Paxton WG, Heerdt L, Berk BC, Delafontaine P, Bernstein KE. Direct stimulation of Jak/STAT pathway by the angiotensin II AT1 receptor. Nature. 1995; 375: 247–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Ford CM, Li S, Pickering JG. Angiotensin II stimulates collagen synthesis in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Involvement of the AT(1) receptor, transforming growth factor-beta, and tyrosine phosphorylation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1843–1851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Münzel T, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 1916–1923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Fukai T, Siegfried MR, Ushio-Fukai M, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Modulation of extracellular superoxide dismutase expression by angiotensin II and hypertension. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 23–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Kakinuma Y, Hama H, Sugiyama F, Yagami K, Goto K, Murakami K, Fukamizu A. Impaired blood–brain barrier function in angiotensinogen deficient mice. Nat Med. 1998; 4: 1078–1080.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Fazekas F, Launer LJ, Niederkorn K, Kapeller P, Lechner A, Kostner GM. Angiotensinogen polymorphism M235T, carotid atherosclerosis and small vessel disease-related cerebral abnormalities. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 110–115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M J E van Rijn, M J Bos, A Isaacs, M Yazdanpanah, A Arias-Vasquez, B H C. Stricker, O H Klungel, B A Oostra, P J Koudstaal, J C Witteman, et al.
Polymorphisms of the renin angiotensin system are associated with blood pressure, atherosclerosis and cerebral white matter pathology
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1083 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. E. Dickson, M. B. Zimmerman, K. Rahmouni, and C. D. Sigmund
The -20 and -217 Promoter Variants Dominate Differential Angiotensinogen Haplotype Regulation in Angiotensinogen-Expressing Cells
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 631 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. E. Dickson and C. D. Sigmund
Genetic Basis of Hypertension: Revisiting Angiotensinogen
Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 14 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/2592    most recent
01.STR.0000144646.96121.d2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijn, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke