| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:2746.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From Oregon Stroke Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Ore.
Correspondence to Dr Helmi L. Lutsep, Oregon Stroke Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, CR 131, Portland, OR 97239. E-mail lutseph{at}ohsu.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemorrhagic Stroke
Hemorrhagic stroke has received far less attention than ischemic stroke. Hemorrhagic stroke offers >1 potential approach for treatment, some of which are only now being assessed in clinical trials. These include preventing hematoma expansion, reducing any perihemorrhage oligemia, and preventing hemorrhage recurrence.
The International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH) was the first multicenter trial to assess the efficacy of early surgical evacuation of hemorrhage. This trial, reported in February 2004, required that patients be randomized to surgery or conservative treatment by 96 hours after the ictus.1 Perhaps because the trial allowed both superficial and deep hemorrhage locations to be included, it showed a neutral effect for surgery.
Although seemingly counterintuitive to the treatment of hemorrhage, the use of a lytic was also reported in February 2004. In an early safety trial in patients with intraventricular hemorrhage, low-dose tissue plasminogen activator was injected into the ventricles to reduce clot burden.2 Although high adverse event rates will require careful planning of future trials, encouraging trends toward improved functional outcomes were seen.
A trial comparing activated recombinant factor VII (NovoSeven) administered intravenously to placebo provides another way to try to prevent hemorrhage expansion (Novo Nordisk). The phase IIb trial completed enrollment in March 2004. Compared to the placebo group, treated patients had a reduction in hematoma growth at 24 hours as measured by computed tomography (Novo Nordisk).
Whether perihematoma ischemia exists has been a matter of debate. A recent magnetic resonance imaging study showed increased rates of water diffusion in the perihematoma region, suggesting the edema is plasma-derived and not related to ischemia.3 Patients with hemorrhagic strokes were included in the CLASS H subgroup of the multicenter clomethiazole (Astra Pharmaceuticals) neuroprotection trial reported in 2000.4,5 Clomethiazole is a gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor agonist that reduces depolarization by increasing chloride conductance. In the CLASS H safety study, mortality rates were higher in the clomethiazole-treated patients than in the placebo cohort (P=0.08). Because more patients in the treatment group were taking warfarin, however, the cause of the increased mortality was unclear.
A National Institutes of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) workshop, titled Priorities for Clinical Intracerebral Hemorrhage Research, was held in November 2003 to advise the institute about the future of acute intracerebral hemorrhage research. The 29 participants took part in 6 study groups: the current state of intracerebral hemorrhage research and patient care; basic science; medical therapy; surgical therapy; imaging; and clinical methodology challenges. The findings of the workshop have been submitted for publication.
The greatest strides in reducing disability from hemorrhagic strokes may come from their prevention. In addition to a renewed focus on blood pressure treatment to prevent hypertensive hemorrhages and innovations in the treatment of vascular malformations, the prevention of hemorrhagic strokes caused by cerebral amyloid angiopathy has entered the treatment arena. Safety data for the phase II study (jointly funded by the NINDS and Neurochem, Inc) of Cerebril, a drug that may help to prevent amyloid deposition as one of its mechanisms, was presented in April 2004.6 Although dose-dependent nausea and vomiting were seen, no significant safety issues were identified. The drug showed good oral absorption and detection in the cerebrospinal fluid. Efficacy trials are planned.
Acute Ischemic Stroke
All clinical neuroprotection trials in ischemic stroke have failed to show efficacy thus far. These include agents that work on early steps in the ischemic cascade, such as those blocking or modulating receptors or ion channels to reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release,5,711 and those drugs that act on later ischemic events, like leukocyte adhesion blockers and membrane stabilizers.12,13 Some of these trials had treatment windows exceeding 6 hours.5,13 Others treated patients with mild symptoms or no cortical signs, excluding patients with the gray matter tissue most likely to contain the receptors targeted by the drugs.911 The spontaneous improvement in these patients with mild symptoms also potentially diluted the benefits seen from treatment. In the Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial, however, patients without cortical strokes paradoxically showed more benefit than those with cortical features.11 Although this could be because of an effect of magnesium on white matter ischemia, it may also be the result of unrelated factors.11
Many current trials have included patients with symptoms lasting <6 hours and have limited enrollment to those with moderately severe strokes and cortical signs. In addition, most of the current trials allow the concurrent use of lytics to increase perfusion and help the neuroprotective strategies to succeed.14,15 Such phase III trials currently in progress include an inhibitor of abnormal astrocyte activation, ONO-2506 (Ono Pharmaceuticals), a serotonin agonist, repinotan (Bayer Corporation) (completed enrollment in June 2004), and a free radical scavenger, NXY-059 (Astra Zeneca), although the free radial scavenger trial requires significant weakness but no cortical signs. However, an agent assessed in 2 international trials that enrolled patients with cortical signs within 6 hours has already shown negative results. The agent, BMS-204352 (Bristol-Myers Squibb), is a maxi-K channel modulator.16
The future of neuroprotection trial design has already arrived with the advent of the Field Administration of Stroke TherapyMagnesium (FAST-MAG) Phase III clinical trial, in which treatment is given earlier than in any trial to date.17 In this ongoing study, paramedics administer a loading dose of magnesium sulfate or matched placebo in the field to patients with a deficit that has been present for at least 15 minutes but <2 hours.
The Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) has met 4 times since1999 to provide guidelines for the evaluation of candidate drugs in an effort to increase the chances of identifying a successful one. Recommendations for preclinical models have included obtaining adequate dose-response curves, performing time window assessments at delayed time points, and assessing the drug in >1 species.14 More recent STAIR clinical guidelines suggest identifying agents and patient subgroups, especially through imaging, that allow for later intervention, considering multimodal approaches using mechanical and thrombolytic techniques or >1 neuroprotectant, and increasing the efficiency of trials by considering the formation of consortia and centralized databases.15
The implementation of trial design changes and careful selection of endpoints offers optimism that a neuroprotectant will show efficacy. Ongoing identification of novel mechanisms of treatment provides further hope for stroke patients.
Received June 15, 2004; accepted August 5, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Naff N, Hanley DF, Bullock R, Mayer S, Coplin W, Tuhrim S, Rohney D, Harris D, Zuccerrello M, the IVH Collaborative Study Group. Safety of rt-PA for ICH with IVH. Late-Breaking Topics, 29th International Stroke Conference, San Diego, CA; February 7, 2004.
3. Butcher KS, Baird T, MacGregor L, Desmond P, Tress B, Davis S. Perihematomal edema in primary intracerebral hemorrhage is plasma derived. Stroke. 2004; 35: 18791885.
4. Shuaib A and the CLASS-IHT Investigators. Safety of clomethiazole for acute stroke hemorrhages (CLASS-H): final results. Neurology. 2000; 4: A64.
5. Lyden P, Shuaib A, Ng K, Levin K, Atkinson RP, Rajpu A, Wechsler L, Ashwood T, Claesson L, Odergren T, Salazar-Grueso E on behalf of the CLASS-I/H/T Investigators. Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in ischemic stroke (CLASS-I): final results. Stroke. 2002; 33: 122128.
6. Greenberg SM, Schneider AT, Pettigrew LC, Gandy SE, Fitzsimmons B-F, Schwab K, Laurin J, Garceau D. Phase II study of Cerebril, a candidate treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Neurology; April 27, 2004.
7. Davis SM, Albers GW, Diener H-C. Termination of acute stroke studies involving selfotel treatment. Lancet. 1997; 349: 32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Grotta J. Lubeluzole treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The US and Canadian Lubeluzole Ischemic Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1997; 28: 23382346.
9. Clark WM, Raps EC, Tong DC, Kelly RE. Cervene (nalmefene) in acute ischemic stroke: final results of a phase III efficacy study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 12341239.
10. Sacco RL, DeRosa JT, Haley EC, Levin B, Ordronneau P, Phillips SJ, Rundek T, Snipes RG, Thompson JLP. Glycine antagonist in neuroprotection for patients with acute stroke: GAIN Americas: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285: 17601761.
11. Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke (IMAGES) Study Investigators. Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363: 439445.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial Investigators. Use of anti-CAM-1 therapy in ischemic stroke: results of the Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial. Neurology. 2001; 57: 14281434.
13. Clark WM, Wechsler LR, Sabounjian LA, Schwiderski UE. A phase III randomized efficacy trial of 2000 mg citicoline in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurology. 2001; 57: 5951602.
14. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke. 1999; 30: 27522758.
15. Fisher M; for the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable. Recommendations for advancing development of acute stroke therapies. Stroke. 2003; 34: 15391546.
16. Bozik M, Hommel M, Grotta J, Fisher M, Fayad P, Bogousslavsky J, Brunell R, Fernandes L, Colby S, Noonan T, Douglass A. Efficacy and safety of MaxiPost in patients with acute stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2001; 187: S255.
17. Saver JL, Kidwell CS, Hamilton S, Eckstein M, Cohen S, Radziszewsks B, Gung G, Starkman S. The Field Administration of Stroke TherapyMagnesium (FAST-MAG) Phase 3 clinical trial. Ongoing Clinical Trial Abstracts, 29th International Stroke Conference, San Diego, CA; February 5, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Hanley and W. Hacke Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Neurology in Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 205 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |