(Stroke. 2004;35:2795.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Medicine (I.G., M.W.L., G.N.F., J.N., M.P.S.A.), Wallenberg Laboratory, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital; the Department of Cardiology (I.G.), Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; the Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research (J.M.), Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden; and the Instituto Cardiovascular de Lisboa (L.M.P., N.D., J.F.F.), Lisbon, Portugal.
Correspondence to Isabel Gonçalves, University of Lund, Wallenberg Laboratory, Entrance 46, 1st Floor, Malmö University Hospital, SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden. E-mail isabel.goncalves{at}medforsk.mas.lu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Echogenicity of human carotid plaques was analyzed by standardized high-definition ultrasound and classified into echolucent, with gray-scale median (GSM) <32 and echogenic with GSM
32. The biochemical composition of the plaques was assessed by fast-performance liquid chromotography and high-performance thin-layer chromotography.
Results As assessed biochemically (milligrams per gram [mg/g]), echolucent plaques contained less hydroxyapatite (43.8 [SD 41.2] mg/g versus 121.6 [SD 106.2] mg/g; P=0.018), more total elastin (1.7 [SD 0.4] mg/g versus 1.2 [SD 0.4] mg/g; P=0.008), and more intermediate-size elastin forms (1.2 [SD 0.3] mg/g versus 0.8 [SD 0.4] mg/g; P=0.018). There was no difference in collagen amount between echogenic and echolucent plaques, neither biochemically (15.3 [SD 3.7] mg/g versus 14.4 [SD 3.4] mg/g) nor histologically (13.4 [SD 4.9] % versus 13.0 [SD 5.6] %). Cholesterol esters, unesterified cholesterol, and triglycerides were increased in plaques associated with symptoms (22.5 [SD 23.3] mg/g versus 13.3 [SD 3.2]; P=0.04), but no differences were detected between echolucent and echogenic plaques (13.5 [SD 4.0] versus 20.2 [SD 21.5] mg/g). Similar results were obtained by Oil Red O staining (symptomatic 7.6 [SD 4.7] % versus asymptomatic 4.2 [SD 3.6] %; P=0.03; echolucent 5.9 [SD 4.1] % versus echogenic 5.0 [SD 4.0] % of area).
Conclusions Echogenicity of carotid plaques is mainly determined by their elastin and calcium but not collagen or lipid content. In addition, echolucency is associated to higher elastin content.
Key Words: atherosclerosis calcium carotid artery plaque carotid stenosis elastin ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ultrasonography
Carotid high-definition ultrasonography (ATL-HDI 3000; 710 MHz probe; 60-dB dynamic range and postprocessing linear maps) of 31 plaques was blindly performed preoperatively by 1 observer. Ultrasonographic data of 4 plaques were accidentally lost. Plaques with any size of acoustic shadow were excluded because that could jeopardize the accurate visualization of the whole plaque area. Color-flow Duplex scan was used to assess severity of stenosis using European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria, cross-sectional area reduction, and hemodynamic assessment using an angle of 60°.13 A longitudinal image of each plaque representative of its structure was obtained. Plaques in the near or far wall of the vessel were outlined, as can be seen in the examples in Figure 1. Color imaging was used in parallel to the B-mode images to help in the precise delimitation of the plaque region. The digital images were computer standardized (Adobe Photoshop 3.0) according to previously described and validated methodology, and GSM was determined.8,1417 Plaques were divided in 2 groups: echolucent, with GSM <32 (n=10; Figure 1A through 1C); and echogenic, with GSM
32 (n=17; Figure 1D and 1E) because this previously provided optimal discrimination between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.8,14,18
|
Sample Preparation
Plaques were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen after surgical removal. Two-millimeter-thick fragments from the stenotic region of frozen plaques were taken for histology. Plaques were weighed and homogenized as described previously.19
Analysis of Extracellular Matrix
Elastin, hydroxyapatite, and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAG) were determined as described previously.19 Collagen was assessed by measuring hydroxyproline, assuming that 12.5% of collagen is hydroxyproline.20
Lipid Analysis
Plaque lipids were extracted with hexane:isopropanol (3:2, vol:vol) and applied (Linomat IV system; Camag) on high-performance thin-layer chromatography (TLC) Silica gel 60 plates (Merck). Lipids were separated with a 2-phase solvent system21 in an automatic developing chamber (Camag). Lipids were detected with CuSO4.22 Band densities were measured with a TLC scanner (Camag) and the amounts of respective lipids quantified by comparison with standards.
Histology
Sections from the 2-mm-thick fragment were fixed with Histochoice (Amresco), dipped in 60% isopropanol, and then in 0.4% Oil Red O in 60% isopropanol (for 20 minutes) to stain lipids. Massons trichrome using Ponceau-acid fuchsin (Chroma-Gesellschaft; Schimd), and aniline blue (BDH) was used to assess plaque collagen content. Stained area of plaque (percent of area) was quantified blindly using an Olympus BX60 microscope and computer-aided morphometry (Image Plus).
Statistics
Results were normalized to plaque wet weights. Values are presented as mean (SD), and when using Student t test, mean difference and its SE are shown.
2 test was used to investigate associations with dichotomous variables. Two-group comparisons were performed with unpaired Student t or MannWhitney tests according to the distribution of the variables (normal or not). Spearmans
was used for correlation analysis. Linear regression analysis was performed using GSM as the dependent variable and the biochemical components as independent ones. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test). Symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques had a mean GSM of 35.8 (SD 22.5) and 48.9 (SD 24.9), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients for hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, or tobacco use in the past or currently. There were also no differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in total cholesterol (227 [SD 35] versus 219 [SD 53] mg/dL; 7.4 [SE 19.3]), HDL cholesterol (43 [SD 11] versus 52 [SD 15] mg/dL; 8.7 [SE 5.7]), or LDL cholesterol (150 [SD 33] versus 144 [SD 36] mg/dL; 5.7 [SE 14.9]). Plasma triglycerides were higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (171 [SD 101] versus 103 [SD 46] mg/dL, 68.9 [SE 30.6]; P=0.03).
|
Extracellular Matrix
Hydroxyapatite levels were lower in echolucent (GSM <32) than in the echogenic (GSM
32) plaques (43.8 [SD 41.2] versus 121.6 [SD 106.2] mg/g; P=0.018; Figure 2A). No significant regression model could be found for the hydroxyapatite values. GAG content did not differ between groups (0.7 [SD 0.3] versus 0.6 [SD 0.3] mg/g; 0.16 [SE 0.11]; Figure 2B).
|
Elastin content was higher in echolucent plaques (1.7 [SD 0.4] versus 1.2 [SD 0.4] mg/g; 0.46 [SE 0.16]; P=0.008; Figure 2C). This was also true for intermediate-size elastin forms (1.2 [SD 0.3] versus 0.8 [SD 0.4] mg/g; 0.37 [SE 0.14]; P=0.018; Figure 2D), which may represent dysfunctional elastin.19 In univariate analysis, using GSM as a continuous variable, GSM correlated negatively with total elastin content (r=0.41; P=0.03), as well as with intermediate elastin forms (r=0.53; P=0.007). Using linear regression, significant independent associations were found between GSM and total elastin (P=0.03; Figure 3A), explaining 14% of the GSM variation, whereas for intermediate elastin, this model explained 25% of the variation (P=0.007; Figure 3B).
|
Collagen content was not significantly different between echolucent and echogenic plaques (15.3 [SD 3.7] versus 14.4 [SD 3.4] mg/g; 0.97 [SE 1.41]; Figure 2E). Similar findings were made histologically using image analysis of Masson trichromestained plaque sections (13.4 [SD 4.9] versus 13.0 [SD 5.6] percent of area; Figure 2F). These stainings correlated with plaque collagen content as assessed biochemically (r=0.43; P=0.02).
No other components besides elastin showed significant Spearman correlation to GSM. Similarly, no statistically significant results were found for the other components when linear regression models with GSM as the dependent variable were evaluated.
Lipids
Lipid analysis showed no difference in phospholipids between plaques associated with symptoms and asymptomatic plaques (121.0 [SD 26.3] versus 103.9 [SD 30.3] mg/g; 17.0 [SE 10.3]; Figure 4A). However, cholesterol esters were higher in symptomatic plaques than in asymptomatic ones (11.0 [SD 10.3] versus 6.4 [SD 1.9] mg/g; P=0.02). Total neutral lipids (22.5 [SD 23.3] versus 13.3 [SD 3.2] mg/g; P=0.04; Figure 4B) and Oil Red Ostained area (7.6 [SD 4.7] versus 4.2 [SD 3.6] percent of area; 3.4 [SE 1.5]; P=0.03; Figure 4C) were also increased in symptomatic plaques, whereas no differences were found for unesterified cholesterol (8.0 [SD 8.6] versus 5.3 [SD 2.0] mg/g) and triglycerides (3.4 [SD 4.9] versus 1.5 [SD 1.0] mg/g; 1.9 [SE 1.2]).
|
Comparison of echolucent (GSM <32) and echogenic (GSM
32) plaques demonstrated no differences in phospholipid content (105.1 [SD 23.3] versus 114.6 [SD 32.2] mg/g; 9.5 [SE 11.7]; Figure 4D), neutral lipids (13.5 [SD 4.0] versus 20.2 [SD 21.5] mg/g; Figure 4E) or lipid-stained area (5.9 [SD 4.1] versus 5.0 [SD 4.0] percent of area; 0.9 [SE 1.6]; Figure 4F). In respect to the different subgroups of neutral lipids, unesterified cholesterol content was lower in echolucent than in echogenic plaques (4.2 [SD 2.4] versus 8.0 [SD 7.6] mg/g; P=0.04), whereas no significant differences were found for cholesterol esters (7.4 [SD 2.7] versus 9.5 [SD 9.6] mg/g) or triglycerides (1.9 [SD 1.2] versus 2.8 [SD 4.6] mg/g; 0.9 [SD 1.5]). No statistically significant correlation was found between GSM and any of the plaque lipid fractions analyzed. No significant results were obtained in the linear regression for any of the plaque lipids (independent variables) and GSM (dependent variable).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
32) plaques contain more hydroxyapatite and less elastin. In contrast, echogenic and echolucent plaques contained similar amounts of collagen, suggesting that calcification rather than collagen content is the major determinant of plaque echogenicity. This observation contradicts previous reports of an association between echogenicity and fibrous tissue based only on histology.11,12,23 The lower amount of hydroxyapatite in echolucent plaques as well as the higher amounts of elastin and intermediate elastin forms are in agreement with the pattern observed earlier19 for symptomatic plaques. Coronary plaques associated with unstable angina have higher intimal elastin content than those in stable angina.24 Furthermore, elastin peptides are involved in several processes implicated in atherogenesis2527 and increased elastin turnover contributes to increased oxidative stress in lesions.28 Elastin is also involved in lipid entrapment in vascular wall.29 The inverse correlation and the results from the regression models between GSM and elastin and its intermediary forms suggest that, apart from detecting calcification, echography can provide further insight into plaque composition. The fact that no statistically significant associations were found between hydroxyapatite and GSM using linear regression analysis is likely attributable to the relatively small number of samples in this study. In accordance with the present observations, previous histological studies have demonstrated associations between tissue contents of calcium and GSM values.10 This study confirms these results by biochemical analyses. The higher levels of neutral lipids as well as the larger Oil Red Ostained areas found in symptomatic plaques agree with the notion that vulnerable plaques have large lipid pools. In contrast to previous studies, where more lipid was found histologically in echolucent plaques,11 we found no differences between echolucent and echogenic plaques, neither biochemically nor histologically. In our data, unesterified cholesterol content was actually lower in echolucent plaques than in the echogenic.
Histological analysis has several advantages, allowing detailed assessment of the spatial distribution of plaque constituents, as well as the identification of specific cell types and proteins by immunohistochemistry. However, biochemical analysis is advantageous in the respect that it allows accurate quantification of individual plaque constituents. The risk factor profile of the patients included in this study shows no apparent difference from what generally is observed in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.24 However, the small sample number can limit the representativity of these findings. On the other hand, the specificity of the biochemical analysis allows the identification and quantification of the differences between the groups.
In conclusion, echogenic plaques are characterized by a high degree of calcification, whereas echolucent plaques contain increased intermediate elastin forms. This is the first study in which elastin content is related to echogenicity of human carotid plaques. Differences in collagen or lipid content did not explain differences in echogenicity. The increased understanding of the relationship between echostructure and plaque composition may ultimately improve identification and stratification of patients with high-risk plaques.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 28, 2004; revision received August 25, 2004; accepted September 24, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Group ECSTC. Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351: 13791387.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. ACAS. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. J Am Med Assoc. 1995; 273: 14211428.
4. NASCET. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 445453.[Abstract]
5. Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the Tromso Study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 21712175.
6. Tegos TJ, Kalomiris KJ, Sabetai MM, Kalodiki E, Nicolaides AN. Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 16051612.
7. Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Schroeder TV, Vorstrup S, Sillesen H. Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes. Circulation. 2001; 104: 6873.
8. el-Barghouty N, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides A, Androulakis A, Bahal V. Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995; 9: 389393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hartley CJ, Strandness DE Jr. The effects of atherosclerosis on the transmission of ultrasound. J Surg Res. 1969; 9: 575582.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lal BK, Hobson RW II, Pappas PJ, Kubicka R, Hameed M, Chakhtoura EY, Jamil Z, Padberg FT Jr, Haser PB, Duran WN, Chakhtura EY. Pixel distribution analysis of B-mode ultrasound scan images predicts histologic features of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35: 12101217.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gronholdt ML, Wiebe BM, Laursen H, Nielsen TG, Schroeder TV, Sillesen H. Lipid-rich carotid artery plaques appear echolucent on ultrasound B-mode images and may be associated with intraplaque haemorrhage. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997; 14: 439445.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kardoulas DG, Katsamouris AN, Gallis PT, Philippides TP, Anagnostakos NK, Gorgoyannis DS, Gourtsoyannis NC. Ultrasonographic and histologic characteristics of symptom-free and symptomatic carotid plaque. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 4: 580590.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Strandness JD. Extracranial arterial disease. In: Duplex Scan in Vascular Disorders. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993: 113157.
14. Pedro LM, Pedro MM, Goncalves I, Carneiro TF, Balsinha C, Fernandes e Fernandes R, Fernandes e Fernandes J. Computer-assisted carotid plaque analysis: characteristics of plaques associated with cerebrovascular symptoms and cerebral infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000; 19: 118123.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Elatrozy T, Nicolaides A, Tegos T, Griffin M. The objective characterisation of ultrasonic carotid plaque features. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998; 16: 223230.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Elatrozy T, Nicolaides A, Tegos T, Zarka AZ, Griffin M, Sabetai M. The effect of B-mode ultrasonic image standardisation on the echodensity of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid bifurcation plaques. Int Angiol. 1998; 17: 179186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Pare GJ, Stevens JM. Reproducibility of computer-quantified carotid plaque echogenicity: can we overcome the subjectivity? Stroke. 2000; 31: 21892196.
18. El-Barghouty N, Nicolaides A, Tegos T, Geroulakos G. The relative effect of carotid plaque heterogenicity and echogenicity on ipsilateral cerebral infarction and symptoms of cerebrovascular disease. Int Angiol. 1996; 15: 300306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Goncalves I, Moses J, Dias N, Pedro LM, Fernandes e Fernandes J, Nilsson J, Ares MP. Changes related to age and cerebrovascular symptoms in the extracellular matrix of human carotid plaques. Stroke. 2003; 34: 616622.
20. Reddy GK, Enwemeka CS. A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues. Clin Biochem. 1996; 29: 225229.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sjoblom L, Eklund A. Dietary protein and fatty acid composition of liver lipids in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990; 1044: 187192.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Touchstone JC. Thin-layer chromatographic procedures for lipid separation. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995; 671: 169195.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. El-Barghouty NM, Levine T, Ladva S, Flanagan A, Nicolaides A. Histological verification of computerised carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996; 11: 414416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Walczak E, Krus S, Fiejka E, Walski M, Celary-Walska R, Dabrowski M, Witkowski A, Chmielak Z, Ruzyllo W. Light and electron microscopic picture of atherosclerotic plaque in stable and unstable angina. Pol J Pathol. 1999; 50: 8792.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hinek A. Biological roles of the non-integrin elastin/laminin receptor. Biol Chem. 1996; 377: 471480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Peterszegi G, Robert L. Cell death induced in lymphocytes expressing the elastin-laminin receptor by excess agonists: necrosis and apoptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 1998; 52: 369377.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Brassart B, Randoux A, Hornebeck W, Emonard H. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (gelatinase A, MMP-2), membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MTP1-MMP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) expression by elastin-derived peptide in human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1998; 16: 489500.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hauck M, Seres I, Kiss I, Saulnier J, Mohacsi A, Wallach J, Fulop T Jr. Effects of synthesized elastin peptides on human leukocytes. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1995; 37: 4555.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Bobryshev YV, Lord RS. Accumulation of co-localised unesterified cholesterol and neutral lipids within vacuolised elastin fibres in athero-prone areas of the human aorta. Atherosclerosis. 1999; 142: 121131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Ostling, B. Hedblad, G. Berglund, and I. Goncalves Increased Echolucency of Carotid Plaques in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2074 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |