This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/2/410    most recent 01.STR.0000110791.51378.4Ev1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kövari, E. Articles by Giannakopoulos, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kövari, E. Articles by Giannakopoulos, P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Seniors' Health Related Collections Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Pathology of Stroke

(Stroke. 2004;35:410.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Cortical Microinfarcts and Demyelination Significantly Affect Cognition in Brain Aging

Enikö Kövari, MD; Gabriel Gold, MD; François R. Herrmann, MD, MPH; Alessandra Canuto, MD; Patrick R. Hof, MD; Jean-Pierre Michel, MD; Constantin Bouras, MD Panteleimon Giannakopoulos, MD

From the Departments of Psychiatry (A.C., E.K., C.B., P.G.) and Geriatrics (G.G., F.R.H., J.-P.M.), HUG Belle-Idée, University of Geneva School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Service of Old Age Psychiatry (P.G.), University of Lausanne School of Medicine, Lausanne; and Fishberg Research Center for Neurobiology and Kastor Neurobiology of Aging Laboratories (P.R.H., C.B.) and Departments of Geriatrics and Adult Development and of Ophthalmology (P.R.H.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Dr Gabriel Gold, Department of Geriatrics, University of Geneva Hospitals, 3 Chemin du Pont-Bochet, 1226 Thônex, Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail gabriel.gold{at}hcuge.ch. Or Dr Enikö Kövari, Division of Neuropsychiatry, University of Geneva Hospitals, 1225 Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland. E-mail eniko.kovair{at}hcuge.ch.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background and Purpose— Microvascular lesions are common in brain aging, but their clinical impact is debated. Methodological problems such as the masking effect of concomitant pathologies may explain discrepancies among previous studies. To evaluate the cognitive consequences of such lesions, we prospectively investigated elderly individuals with various degrees of cognitive impairment but without significant neurofibrillary tangle pathology or macrovascular lesions.

Methods— This was a clinicopathological study of 45 elderly individuals. Cognitive status was assessed prospectively with the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale; neuropathological evaluation included Aß-protein deposition staging and bilateral semiquantitative assessment of cortical microinfarcts, focal cortical and white matter glioses, and diffuse white matter and periventricular demyelination.

Results— In a univariate logistic regression model, cortical microinfarcts explained 36.1% of the variability in CDR; periventricular demyelination, 10.6%; and diffuse white matter demyelination, 4.6%. After controlling for age and Aß-protein deposition, cortical microinfarcts were the best predictor of cognitive status (19.9% of CDR variability), whereas periventricular and diffuse white matter demyelination accounted for 9.7% and 5.4% of CDR variability, respectively. Altogether, these 3 types of microvascular lesions explained 27.9% of the clinical variability. Focal cortical and white matter glioses were not related to clinical outcome.

Conclusions— Our data imply that cortical microinfarcts and both periventricular and deep white matter demyelination contribute significantly to the progression of cognitive deficits in brain aging. In contrast, the neuropathological evaluation of focal cortical and white matter gliosis has no clinical validity.

Key Words: aging • brain ischemia • cognition • dementia, vascular • microvascular injury

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The morphological substrates of dementia associated with cerebrovascular disease are still poorly defined. The traditional view of a strong relationship between a volume of cerebral infarcts >100 mL and cognitive decline was challenged by Tomlinson and collaborators,¹ who proposed the concept of "strategic macroinfarcts." Consistent with this viewpoint, several neuropathological studies have indicated that even small macroinfarcts can lead to dementia or can significantly worsen cognitive impairment in patients with definite Alzheimer’s disease (AD).^2–8 However, other clinicopathological studies in AD cases have suggested that small macrovascular lesions do not contribute to the overall rate of cognitive decline.^9,10 Moreover, the location of macrovascular lesions is not a sufficient determinant of their clinical impact, as demonstrated by functional imaging studies (for review, see elsewhere^11,12).

The possible impact of isolated microvascular lesions on cognition remains even more controversial, and data regarding this issue are very scarce. Although some studies point to a possible causal relationship with dementia^2–4,13 this point of view has been challenged.¹⁰ Three main methodological issues may explain the difficulty to define the role of microvascular pathology in cognitive deterioration. Microvascular lesions are highly heterogeneous and include several pathological changes with possibly distinct patterns of clinical impact such as microinfarcts, focal cortical and white matter glioses, and diffuse white matter (DWMD) and periventricular demyelination (PVD). Because they are diffusely developed within the brain, a valid evaluation of their effect on cognition presupposes their systematic bilateral assessment in cortical regions known to be highly involved in dementia such as the hippocampus and neocortical association areas.¹⁴ Moreover, the concomitant presence of age-related AD pathology such as amyloid deposits and, most importantly, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), which represent the strongest correlate of neuronal loss and cognition in AD,^15,16 can mask the consequences of microvascular pathology in the very frequent cases with mixed pathology.^5,17 To address these issues, we report clinicopathological correlations in a large series of prospectively investigated elderly individuals with various degrees of cognitive impairment but without significant NFT pathology or macrovascular lesions. The present analysis included bilateral assessment of all types of microvascular lesions and is based on multivariate models that control for the interaction between microvascular pathology, age, and amyloid deposits.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The sample included 45 patients 63 to 100 years of age who died and were autopsied at the geriatric and psychiatric hospitals of the University of Geneva School of Medicine (Switzerland). The presence and severity of dementia were assessed in all cases with the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) during the 3 months before death. The CDR is a validated scale widely used for clinical staging of dementia.¹⁸ It assigns cognitive function to 5 levels defined as no (CDR 0), questionable (CDR 0.5), mild (CDR 1), moderate (CDR 2), and severe (CDR 3) dementia. Sex and age distributions of the cases according to CDR score are listed in the Table. Cases with stroke history or other central nervous system disorders (ie, tumors, inflammation, Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body disease) were excluded from the present study.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Demographic Data in the Present Series

Brains obtained at autopsy were fixed in 15% formaldehyde for at least 4 weeks and cut into 1-cm-thick coronal slices. All cases were classified neuropathologically according to Braak and Braak¹⁹ and Thal and collaborators²⁰ using highly specific and fully characterized antibodies to the microtubule-associated tau protein²¹ and to the core-amyloid Aß-protein.²² The antibodies used in the present study were a monoclonal anti-tau antibody (AT8, 1/1000, Immunogenetics) and monoclonal anti-Aß antibody (4G8, 1/1000, Signet Laboratories). Tissues were incubated overnight at 4°C. After incubation, sections were processed by the PAP method with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen.²³ For NFT, all cases were classified as belonging to the transentorhinal (I and II), limbic (III and IV), or neocortical Braak stages (V and VI).¹⁹ Aß-protein deposition staging was performed according to the amyloid nomenclature proposed by Thal and collaborators.²⁰ To avoid the masking effect of substantial NFT-related pathology, only cases with very early Braak NFT stages I and II were considered in the present study. For the same reasons, cases with macrovascular pathology such as cortical macroinfarcts and lacunes identified in the macroscopic examination were excluded.

To visualize microinfarcts and focal cortical and white matter gliosis, tissue blocks from the anterior hippocampus, inferior temporal cortex (area 20), frontal cortex (area 9), and parietal cortex (area 40) bilaterally were cut into 20-µm-thick sections and stained with the Globus silver impregnation technique (Figure 1).²³ To assess DWMD and PVD, coronal slices at the level of the anterior border of the corpus callosum were embedded in paraffin, cut into 20-µm-thick sections, and stained with Luxol-van Gieson stain (Figure 1).

View larger version (156K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Representative examples of microvascular lesions assessed in the present study: multiple microinfarcts in the frontal cortex (a; arrows), white matter gliosis (b), focal cortical gliosis (c), and severe DWMD and PVD (d). Sections were stained with Globus silver impregnation (a through c) and Luxol van-Gieson stain (d). Scale bar: 1000 mm (a), 250 µm (b), and 125 µm (c).

Microinfarcts and focal cortical gliosis were assessed semiquantitatively in 10 sections per area with the following score: 0 (absence of such lesions), 1 (<3 lesions per slide), 2 (3 to 5 lesions per slide), or 3 (>5 lesions per slide). Semiquantitative assessment of white matter gliosis was made in the same number of sections with the following rating scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. For each lesion, a total score was obtained by adding the scores of each area. The severity of DWMD and PVD in each hemisphere was estimated in Luxol-van Gieson–stained sections with the semiquantitative scale described above. Scores for each hemisphere were added to obtain a total score. Braak NFT and Aß-protein deposition staging and semiquantitative assessment of microvascular pathology were performed by 2 independent investigators (E.K. and C.B.) who were blinded to the clinical findings, with a high interrater reliability (=0.88 to 0.95).

The 45 cases included in this study represent consecutive autopsies from the institutions mentioned above who met inclusion criteria (CDR within 3 months of death) and none of the exclusion criteria (history of stroke or other central nervous system disorders, Braak NFT stage >II, macroinfarcts or lacunes on macroscopic examination). Permission for autopsy was obtained in all cases from family members, and the study was approved by the ethics committee.

After normalization of the neuropathological variables, maximal likelihood ordered logistic regression with proportional odds was used to evaluate the association between CDR scores (the dependent variable) and neuropathological parameters (Aß-protein deposition staging and microvascular pathology scores as the independent variables) in a univariate model. Subsequently, the same method was applied in a multivariate model to take into account the effect of age and the interaction between the neuropathological variables. Because the Aß-protein deposition staging is an ordinal scale, it was entered into the models as a dummy variable (3 levels). Given the number of cases, a maximum of 5 independent variables were entered into each multivariate model. Maximum likelihood ordered logistic regression can be used to measure the relationship between an ordinal outcome variable (CDR) and several independent variables. This method can also evaluate the amount of variability of the outcome variable (ie, the CDR score) that can be explained by the independent variables (ie, age, Aß-protein phase, microvascular pathology) and thus provide an estimate of the strength of the relationship. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata software package, release 6.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Mild Aß-protein deposition was present in most cases (stage A, 46.7%; stage B, 28.9%). Despite the presence of minimal NFT pathology confined to the entorhinal cortex, >24% of cases displayed substantial Aß-protein deposition within the medial temporal lobe (stage C, 17.8%; stage D, 6.7%). Although age and Aß-protein deposition staging were significantly related to clinical outcome (P<0.05), they predicted only 5.4% and 8.0% of the CDR variability, respectively. Among the different types of microvascular pathology, only cortical microinfarcts, DWMD, and PVD were significantly associated with CDR score (Figure 2). In a univariate model, the microinfarct score explained 36.1% of the variability in CDR (P<0.01); PVD score, 10.6% (P<0.001); and DWMD, 4.6% (P<0.05).

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Relationship between clinical severity and microvascular scores for PVD, DWMD, cortical microinfarcts, and combined microvascular score (see text for details).

A multivariate model that included age and Aß-protein deposition staging accounted for 10.4% of the variability in CDR score. The addition of microinfarct score explained an extra 19.9% of the clinical variability, whereas that of either PVDs or DWMDs explained an extra 9.7% and 5.4%, respectively. Amyloid deposition was not significantly correlated with clinical outcome in any of these models. To assess the combined effect of microinfarcts, PVD, and DWMD on cognition, we calculated a combined microvascular score (microinfarct score/4+PVD score+DWMD score) (Figure 2). In a multivariate model including age, Aß-protein deposition staging, and the combined microvascular score, the latter explained 27.9% of the variability in CDR score. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, focal cortical and white matter glioses were not related to clinical outcome.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Strengths of the present study include the detailed analysis of the different types of microvascular lesions in cortical areas bilaterally, controlling for the most important confounding variables (ie, substantial NFT pathology corresponding to limbic and neocortical Braak stages and macroinfarcts), and use of multivariate models for statistical analysis that can estimate the predictive value of each neuropathological measure, taking into account the strength of their interaction. In the present series, cortical microinfarcts explain 20% of the clinical variability after controlling for age and Aß-protein deposition stage. This value is comparable to that previously reported for NFT Braak staging in a large autopsy series,¹⁵ indicating that the assessment of cortical microinfarcts may represent a predictor of cognitive decline in the absence of substantial NFT pathology as strong as NFT staging in elderly individuals without vascular pathology.^4,13

DWMD and PVD were also related to cognition in the present series. Several MRI studies addressed the correlation of white matter lesions and cognitive dysfunction in the elderly with conflicting results.^24–27 Two recent studies comparing MRI with postmortem data demonstrated a poor correlation between the presence of whiter matter hyperintensities and demyelination.^28,29 In fact, white matter lesions depicted on MRI correspond to variable combinations of myelin and axonal loss, as well as scattered microinfarcts, astrogliosis, and dilatation of periventricular spaces.²⁸ It is thus not surprising that the clinical validity of white matter lesions is difficult to establish in the absence of neuropathological data.²⁷ Our autopsy series provides important evidence of an association between cognitive decline and both DWMD and PVD in the elderly.

The present data also allow evaluation of the strength of the relationship between each type of microvascular pathology and cognition. The semiquantitative assessment of cortical microinfarcts in frontal, parietal, and temporal association areas and hippocampus represents the most promising neuropathological variable in terms of clinicopathological correlations. Our results also show that PVD accounts for double the clinical variability compared with DWMD. Interestingly, although prior neuroimaging studies have suggested that both diffuse white matter and periventricular lesions correlate with cognitive deterioration,^30,31 more recent data indicate that periventricular white matter lesions may be the strongest determinant^32–34 of cognitive performance. In contrast, focal cortical and white matter glioses seem to have no clinical validity.

These new findings may also be relevant to current efforts of neuropathological standardization in the field of vascular and mixed dementia. The absence of widely accepted neuropathological criteria for vascular and mixed dementia mostly reflects the difficulty in evaluating the relative clinical impact of macrovascular and microvascular lesions and AD-type changes in mixed conditions. The present observations define distinct patterns of clinical validity within the heterogeneous group of microvascular lesions and provide an estimate of their cognitive consequences. This information is of particular value for the design of future clinicopathological studies that need to be conducted in prospectively documented elderly cohorts to address the combined effect of clinically significant microvascular changes, macrovascular pathology, and AD lesions in brain aging.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported in part by grants AG02219 and AG05138 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.R.H.) and by La Fondation Jérome Tessières (P.G.).

	Footnotes

 
Drs Kövari and Gold contributed equally to this work.

Received August 16, 2003; revision received October 6, 2003; accepted October 13, 2003.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Roth M. Observations on the brains of demented old people. J Neurol Sci. 1970; 11: 205–242.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. del Ser T, Bermejo F, Portera A, Arredondo JM, Bouras C, Constantinidis J. Vascular dementia: a clinicopathological study. J Neurol Sci. 1990; 96: 1–17.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Vinters HV, Ellis WG, Zarow C, Zaias BW, Jagust WJ, Mack WJ, Chui HC. Neuropathologic substrates of ischemic vascular dementia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000; 59: 931–945.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Esiri MM, Wilcock GK, Morris JH. Neuropathological assessment of the lesions of significance in vascular dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 63: 749–753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Esiri MM, Nagy Z, Smith MZ, Barnetson L, Smith AD. Cerebrovascular disease and threshold for dementia in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1999; 354: 919–920. Letter.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease: the NUN study. JAMA. 1997; 277: 813–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Erkinjuntti T, Haltia M, Palo J, Sulkava R, Paetau A. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia: a prospective clinical and post-mortem neuropathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988; 51: 1037–1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Derouesne C, Poirier J. [Cerebral lacunae:still under debate]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999; 155: 823–831.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Jellinger KA, Attems J. Incidence of cerebrovascular lesions in Alzheimer’s disease: a postmortem study. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2003; 105: 14–17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Lee JH, Olichney JM, Hansen LA, Hofstetter CR, Thal LJ. Small concomitant vascular lesions do not influence rates of cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2000; 57: 1474–1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Erkinjuntti T, Bowler JV, DeCarli CS, Fazekas F, Inzitari D, O’Brien JT, Pantoni L, Rockwood K, Scheltens P, Wahlund LO, Desmond DW. Imaging of static brain lesions in vascular dementia: implications for clinical trials. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999; 13 (suppl 3): S81–S90.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Kwan LT, Reed BR, Eberling JL, Schuff N, Tanabe J, Norman D, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ. Effects of subcortical cerebral infarction on cortical glucose metabolism and cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56: 809–814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Esiri MM. Which vascular lesions are of importance in vascular dementia? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 903: 239–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Giannakopoulos P, Hof PR, Michel J-P, Guimon J, Bouras C. Cerebral cortex pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative survey of large hospital-based geriatric and psychiatric cohorts. Brain Res Rev. 1997; 25: 217–245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Gold G, Kovari E, Corte G, Herrmann FR, Canuto A, Bussiere T, Hof PR, Bouras C, Giannakopoulos P. Clinical validity of a beta-protein deposition staging in brain aging and Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001; 60: 946–952.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Giannakopoulos P, Herrmann FR, Bussiere T, Bouras C, Kovari E, Perl DP, Morrison JH, Gold G, Hof PR. Tangle and neuron numbers, but not amyloid load, predict cognitive status in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2003; 60: 1495–1500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Pathological correlates of late-onset dementia in a multicentre, community-based population in England and Wales: Neuropathology Group of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Lancet. 2001; 357: 169–175.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982; 140: 566–572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991; 82: 239–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Thal DR, Rub U, Schultz C, Sassin I, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K, Braak E, Braak H. Sequence of Abeta-protein deposition in the human medial temporal lobe. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000; 59: 733–748.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Mercken M, Vandermeeren M, Lubke U, Six J, Boons J, Van de Voorde A, Martin JJ, Ghevens J. Monoclonal antibodies with selective specificity for Alzheimer Tau are directed against phosphatase-sensitive epitopes. Acta Neuropathol. 1992; 84: 265–272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Kim KS, Miller DL, Sapienza VG, Chen CCJ, Vai C, Grundke-Iqbal I, Curry JR, Wisniewski HM. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive to synthetic cerebrovascular amyloid peptide. Neurosci Res Commun. 1988; 2: 121–130.

23. Vallet PG, Guntern R, Hof PR, Golaz J, Delacourte A, Robakis NK, Bouras C. A comparative study of histological and immunohistochemical methods for neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 1992; 83: 170–178.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. van Gijn J. Leukoaraiosis and vascular dementia. Neurology. 1998; 51: S3–S8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Tanabe JL, Ezekiel F, Jagust WJ, Reed BR, Norman D, Schuff N, Weiner MW, Chui H, Fein G. Magnetization transfer ratio of white matter hyperintensities in subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20: 839–844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Damian MS, Schilling G, Bachmann G, Simon C, Stoppler S, Dorndorf W. White matter lesions and cognitive deficits: relevance of lesion pattern? Acta Neurol Scand. 1994; 90: 430–436.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Golomb J, Kluger A, Gianutsos J, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, George AE. Nonspecific leukoencephalopathy associated with aging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1995; 5: 33–44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Udaka F, Sawada H, Kameyama M. White matter lesions and dementia: MRI-pathological correlation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 977: 411–415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Sahlas DJ, Bilbao JM, Swartz RH, Black SE. Clasmatodendrosis correlating with periventricular hyperintensity in mixed dementia. Ann Neurol. 2002; 52: 378–381.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Garde E, Mortensen EL, Krabbe K, Rostrup E, Larsson HB. Relation between age-related decline in intelligence and cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in healthy octogenarians: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2000; 356: 628–634.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Barber R, Scheltens P, Gholkar A, Ballard C, McKeith I, Ince P, Perry R, O’Brien J. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and normal aging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999; 67: 66–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. De Groot JC, De Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, Van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Periventricular cerebral white matter lesions predict rate of cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 2002; 52: 335–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and subjective cognitive dysfunction: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology. 2001; 56: 1539–1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2000; 47: 145–151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Gold, P. Giannakopoulos, F. R Herrmann, C. Bouras, and E. Kovari Identification of Alzheimer and vascular lesion thresholds for mixed dementia Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 2830 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kovari, G. Gold, F. R. Herrmann, A. Canuto, P. R. Hof, C. Bouras, and P. Giannakopoulos Cortical microinfarcts and demyelination affect cognition in cases at high risk for dementia Neurology, March 20, 2007; 68(12): 927 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Behl, C. Bocti, R. H. Swartz, F. Gao, D. J. Sahlas, K. L. Lanctot, D. L. Streiner, and S. E. Black Strategic Subcortical Hyperintensities in Cholinergic Pathways and Executive Function Decline in Treated Alzheimer Patients Arch Neurol, February 1, 2007; 64(2): 266 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Nishimura, C. B. Schaffer, B. Friedman, P. D. Lyden, and D. Kleinfeld Penetrating arterioles are a bottleneck in the perfusion of neocortex PNAS, January 2, 2007; 104(1): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. McKhann, M. A. Grega, L. M. Borowicz Jr, W. A. Baumgartner, and O. A. Selnes Stroke and Encephalopathy After Cardiac Surgery: An Update Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 562 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Peters Ageing and the brain Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2006; 82(964): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Gold, E. Kovari, F. R. Herrmann, A. Canuto, P. R. Hof, J.-P. Michel, C. Bouras, and P. Giannakopoulos Cognitive Consequences of Thalamic, Basal Ganglia, and Deep White Matter Lacunes in Brain Aging and Dementia Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1184 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. Kuller, O. L. Lopez, W. J. Jagust, J. T. Becker, S. T. DeKosky, C. Lyketsos, C. Kawas, J.C.S. Breitner, A. Fitzpatrick, and C. Dulberg Determinants of vascular dementia in the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study Neurology, May 10, 2005; 64(9): 1548 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/2/410    most recent 01.STR.0000110791.51378.4Ev1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kövari, E. Articles by Giannakopoulos, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kövari, E. Articles by Giannakopoulos, P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Seniors' Health Related Collections Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke Pathology of Stroke