Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:596-600
Published online before print January 15, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000113691.32026.06
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/596    most recent
01.STR.0000113691.32026.06v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Right arrow Articles by Calabresi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Right arrow Articles by Calabresi, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Energy metabolism
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

(Stroke. 2004;35:596.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Coactivation of GABAA and GABAB Receptor Results in Neuroprotection During In Vitro Ischemia

Cinzia Costa, MD; Giorgia Leone, MD; Emilia Saulle, MD; Francesco Pisani, MD; Giorgio Bernardi, MD Paolo Calabresi, MD

From Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Tor Vergata, Rome (C.C., G.L., E.S., G.B., P.C.); Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psichiatria e Anestesiologia Università di Messina, Messina (F.P.); and IRCCS, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome (C.C., G.L., E.S., G.B., P.C.), Italy.

Correspondence to Dr Paolo Calabresi, Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, Rome 00133, Italy. E-mail calabre{at}uniroma2.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— The possible neuroprotective effect of endogenous {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on the irreversible electrophysiological changes induced by in vitro ischemia on striatal neurons was investigated. In particular, the aim of the study was the characterization of the neuroprotective action of 2 antiepileptic drugs increasing GABAergic transmission such as tiagabine, a GABA transporter inhibitor, and vigabatrin, an irreversible inhibitor of GABA transaminase.

Methods— Extracellular field potential recordings were obtained from rat corticostriatal slice preparations. In vitro ischemia was delivered by switching to an artificial cerebrospinal fluid solution in which glucose was omitted and oxygen was replaced with N2.

Results— An irreversible loss of the field potentials recorded from striatal neurons was observed after 10 minutes of ischemia in control solution. Conversely, tiagabine and vigabatrin partially prevented the ischemia-induced field potential loss. Surprisingly, both GABAA and GABAB receptor antagonists blocked these effects. Accordingly, neuroprotection could be obtained only when GABAA and GABAB receptor agonists were coapplied, but not when a single agonist was given in isolation.

Conclusions— Antiepileptic drugs targeting GABAergic transmission can exert neuroprotective effects against ischemia by increasing endogenous GABA levels and via the activation of both GABAA and GABAB receptors.


Key Words: anticonvulsants • corpus striatum • electrophysiology • ischemia • receptors, GABA


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Combined oxygen and glucose deprivation is a well-established in vitro model of ischemia for electrophysiological studies.1–3 The striatum and hippocampus are particularly vulnerable to ischemic insult, and neuronal damage is expressed as an alteration of both intrinsic membrane properties and synaptic transmission of the recorded cells.4–6

A large body of experimental work has been devoted to explore the neuroprotective efficacy of drugs blocking glutamate neurotransmission in animal models of cerebral ischemia.3,7–11 More recently, however, attention has been also focused on {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) changes during ischemia and on possible neuroprotective effects of GABAergic drugs.12–15

Although a number of studies have suggested that increasing GABAergic synaptic transmission might display neuroprotective effects against brain ischemia,16–20 the exact mechanisms underlying these effects have yet to be elucidated.

Increasing GABA function might represent a beneficial therapeutic approach to acute ischemia for different reasons.13,19,20 First, endogenous GABA synthesis and release with consequent reduction in GABAergic transmission are decreased after an ischemic insult. Second, since glutamatergic and GABAergic transmissions work by each counterbalancing the function of the other, enhancing GABAergic activity should balance excessive glutamatergic excitation, which is the pivotal event leading to cell death.

The aim of the present study is to characterize the electrophysiological effects of 2 currently used GABAergic antiepileptic drugs, tiagabine and vigabatrin, and to examine the cellular sites at which they act by using recordings from rat corticostriatal slices. The mechanism of action of the 2 compounds is different. Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of GABA transaminase,21,22 whereas tiagabine blocks GABA reuptake into neurons and glia.23 Their possible differential abilities in protecting neurons against the permanent loss of electric activity caused by combined oxygen and glucose deprivation have been investigated. We have also analyzed the effects of other specific GABAA and GABAB agonists and antagonists.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Preparation and maintenance of rat corticostriatal slices have been previously described.3,24–26 Briefly, corticostriatal coronal slices were prepared from 2- to 3-month-old Wistar rats (thickness, 270 to 300 µm). All the experiments were conducted in conformity with the European Communities Council Directive of November 1986 (86/609/ECC). Slices were kept in artificial cerebrospinal fluid, whose composition was as follows (in mmol/L): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.4 CaCl2, 11 glucose, and 25 NaHCO3. Artificial cerebrospinal fluid temperature was maintained at 34°C and was gassed with O2/CO2 (95%/5%). In vitro ischemia was delivered by switching for 10 minutes to an artificial cerebrospinal fluid solution in which sucrose replaced glucose, gassed with 95% N2 and 5% CO2. Ischemic and drug-containing solutions entered the recording chamber no later than 30 seconds after a 3-way tap was turned.

Electrodes for extracellular recordings (15 to 20 M{Omega}) were filled with 2 mol/L NaCl. An Axoclamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instruments) was used for extracellular recordings. The field potential amplitude was defined as the average of the amplitude from the peak of the early positivity to the peak negativity and the amplitude from the peak negativity to peak late positivity. Quantitative data on modifications induced by ischemia are expressed as a percentage of the control values, the latter representing the mean of responses recorded during a stable period (15 to 20 minutes) before the ischemic phase. Tracings were displayed on a digital oscilloscope (Classic 6000, Gould) and digitally stored.

For data presented as mean±SEM, statistical analysis was performed with the use of Student’s t test. The significance level was established at P<0.05.

Drugs were applied by dissolving them to the desired final concentration in saline solution. Tiagabine was from Sanofi-Synthelabo; vigabatrin was from Camillo Corvi; GABA, muscimol, and CGP 46381 were from Tocris-Cookson; and bicuculline was from Sigma.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Neuroprotective Effect of Tiagabine and Vigabatrin During In Vitro Ischemia
Excitatory glutamatergic field potentials were recorded from the striatum of corticostriatal rat slices.3 In electrophysiological experiments (n=97), the white matter between cortex and striatum was stimulated to obtain field potentials of 1.2±0.3 mV in amplitude and 2±0.5 ms in duration. Stimuli (0.03±0.01 ms and 1 to 5 V) were delivered at a frequency of 0.1 Hz to monitor the time course of field potential amplitude. After 10 to 15 minutes of stable baseline recording, ischemia was applied for 10 minutes. This treatment progressively reduced the amplitude of the field potential, which was completely suppressed in approximately 5 minutes. After the washout of the ischemic medium, the field potential did not recover (P<0.001; n=20) (Figure 1A).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Neuroprotective effect of tiagabine. A, Under control conditions, in vitro ischemia caused an irreversible field potential loss evoked by corticostriatal stimulation (n=20). Incubation of the slices in 30 µmol/L tiagabine partially prevented the ischemia-induced effect (**P<0.01 compared with control; n=12). B, Upper tracings show a single experiment in control conditions in which the ischemic period (10 minutes) produced an irreversible loss of field potential. Lower tracings show another experiment in which preincubation with tiagabine was able to partially reverse the effect of ischemia. C, The neuroprotective effect of tiagabine is dose dependent. A significant recovery was observed in the presence of 10 to 30 µmol/L tiagabine (**P<0.01, n=5; **P<0.01, n=12, respectively). Conversely, lower (3 µmol/L) or higher (100 and 300 µmol/L) doses had no significant effect on postischemic field potential recovery (P>0.05; n=4 for all). D, The neuroprotective effect of tiagabine was antagonized by either bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist, or CGP 46381, a GABAB receptor antagonist (**P<0.01 compared with tiagabine alone; n=4 for both).

The application of 30 µmol/L tiagabine for 10 minutes did not alter per se the amplitude of the field potential. However, in the presence of tiagabine, the field potential partially recovered 10 to 20 minutes after the washout of the ischemic solution (Figure 1A), reaching 41±5% of the preischemic value (P<0.01 compared with control; n=12). Similar results were obtained by the application of 10 µmol/L vigabatrin, which had a neuroprotective effect on field potential even stronger than tiagabine (Figure 2A). In fact, in the presence of vigabatrin, the field potential recovery after in vitro ischemia was approximately 53±6% of the preischemic value (P<0.01 compared with control; n=12).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Neuroprotective effect of vigabatrin. A, Under control conditions, in vitro ischemia caused an irreversible field potential loss evoked by corticostriatal stimulation. Incubation of the slices in 10 µmol/L vigabatrin partially prevented the ischemia-induced effect (**P<0.01 compared with control; n=12). B, Upper tracings show a single experiment in control conditions in which the ischemic period (10 minutes) produced an irreversible loss of field potential. Lower tracings show another experiment in which preincubation with vigabatrin was able to partially reverse the effect of ischemia. C, The neuroprotective effect of vigabatrin is dose dependent. A significant recovery was observed in the presence of 10 µmol/L vigabatrin (**P<0.01; n=12), while it decreased at 30 µmol/L (*P<0.05; n=7). Doses of 3 or 100 µmol/L had no significant effects on postischemic field potential recovery (P>0.05; n=4 for both). D, The neuroprotective effect of vigabatrin was antagonized by either bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist, or CGP 46381, a GABAB receptor antagonist (**P<0.01 compared with vigabatrin alone; n=4 for both).

The efficacy of tiagabine increased from 10 to 30 µmol/L (P<0.01, n=5; P<0.01, n=12, respectively), whereas at lower (3 µmol/L) or higher (100 and 300 µmol/L) doses it had no significant effect on postischemic field potential recovery (P>0.05; n=4 for all) (Figure 1C). Similarly, vigabatrin had a maximal neuroprotective effect at 10 µmol/L (P<0.01; n=12), while it decreased at 30 µmol/L (P<0.05, n=7). Doses of 3 or 100 µmol/L had no significant effects on postischemic field potential recovery (P>0.05; n=4 for both) (Figure 2C).

Coactivation of GABAA and GABAB Receptor Is Required for Neuroprotective Effects Against In Vitro Ischemia
Both tiagabine and vigabatrin are known to act on synaptic GABA levels with different mechanisms.22,23 Thus, to verify whether their neuroprotective effects were mediated by an increased GABAA and/or GABAB receptor function, we applied these drugs in combination with either bicuculline (3 to 10 µmol/L), a GABAA receptor antagonist, or CGP 46381(100 µmol/L), a GABAB receptor antagonist. Surprisingly, the neuroprotective effects of both tiagabine (30 µmol/L) (Figure 1D) and vigabatrin (10 µmol/L) (Figure 2D) were largely reduced by both of these GABA receptor antagonists. In particular, the tiagabine-mediated field potential recovery was reduced to 4±1.5% and 3.5±1.5% of preischemic values by bicuculline and CGP 46381, respectively (P<0.01 compared with tiagabine alone; n=4 for both), while the vigabatrin-mediated field potential recovery was reduced to 5±1.5% and 4.5±1.5% (P<0.01 compared with vigabatrin alone; n=4 for both).

Exogenous GABA and Direct GABAergic Agonist Mimic the Neuroprotective Effect of Tiagabine and Vigabatrin
We also measured the possible neuroprotective action caused by exogenous GABA. In the presence of GABA (100 µmol/L), the field potential partially recovered 10 to 20 minutes after the washout of the ischemic solution (Figure 3A), reaching 36±3% of the preischemic value (P<0.01 compared with control; n=5).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Neuroprotective effect of exogenous GABA. A, Exogenous GABA partially prevented the irreversible field potential loss induced by ischemia (**P<0.01 compared with control; n=5). B, The neuroprotective effect of GABA is dose dependent (**P<0.01; n=5). C, Both bicuculline and CGP 46381 block GABA-induced neuroprotection (**P<0.01 compared with GABA alone; n=4 for both).

However, while GABA was protective at 100 µmol/L (P<0.01, n=5), lower (30 and 50 µmol/L) or higher (200 and 300 µmol/L) doses of this transmitter had no significant effect on postischemic field potential recovery (P>0.05; n=4 for all) (Figure 3B).

Interestingly, the neuroprotective effect of 100 µmol/L GABA (Figure 3C) was largely reduced by either bicuculline (3 to 10 µmol/L) or CGP (100 µmol/L). In particular, the GABA-mediated field potential recovery was reduced to 5±3% and 5±2.5% of preischemic values by bicuculline and CGP 46381, respectively (P<0.01 compared with GABA alone; n=4 for both).

Thus, our hypothesis was that the neuroprotective effect of tiagabine and vigabatrin is mediated by the activation of both GABAA and GABAB receptors. To further investigate the receptor mechanisms of the neuroprotective action, we used 2 GABA agonists: muscimol (1 µmol/L), acting on the GABAA receptor, and baclofen (1 µmol/L), acting on the GABAB receptor (Figure 4). According to previous data, both of these agonists showed a neuroprotective effect only when coapplied (P<0.01 compared with control; n=4) (Figure 4), while no significant recovery was observed when a single agonist was applied (P>0.05 compared with control; n=4).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Coactivation of GABAA and GABAB receptors is required to counteract the ischemia-induced effect. Neither muscimol, a GABAA receptor agonist, nor baclofen, a GABAB receptor agonist, was able to reverse the ischemia-induced loss of field potential. Conversely, coadministration of these agonists caused partial neuroprotection (**P<0.01 compared with control; n=4).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The data in the present study provide further support for the hypothesis that, by increasing GABAergic transmission, it is possible to counteract the neuronal death consequent to an ischemic insult.13,19,20,24 However, we also found that coactivation of both GABAA and GABAB receptors is required to achieve the GABA-mediated neuroprotection during energy deprivation.

Tiagabine and vigabatrin are 2 currently used antiepileptic drugs that are indicated against focal seizures with or without secondary generalization.22,23 Both drugs have been tested in experimental ischemia models. Vigabatrin showed protection of the hippocampal CA1 region and substantia nigra reticulata in a gerbil model of repetitive forebrain ischemia.27 Tiagabine significantly reduced the ischemic-induced elevation of glutamate levels in CA1 area during the postischemic period and protected the CA1 pyramidal cell layer in a gerbil model of transient ischemia.28,29 In these in vivo experiments, however, postischemic hypothermia occurred, and it may have played a role in the obtained results. Hypothermia is a well-known protective factor against cell damage. In our model, however, we found that both drugs were able to protect the field potential amplitude from the irreversible damage induced by ischemia independently from hypothermia. In our experimental condition the temperature of the slices was constantly maintained at 34°C. Preliminary in vitro experiments performed in our laboratory at 36°C showed that both drugs are neuroprotective even when given at "physiological temperature" (C. Costa, MD, et al, unpublished data, 2003).

In the presence of exogenous GABA, we obtained a neuroprotective effect that was similar to that obtained with tiagabine and vigabatrin. The effect of tiagabine, vigabatrin, and GABA was largely reduced in the presence of the GABAergic antagonist such as bicuculline (a selective antagonist of GABAA receptor) or CGP 46381 (a selective antagonist of GABAB receptors).

GABA may protect neurons not only by directly inhibiting neurons30–34 but also by exerting an inhibitory influence on glutamate-mediated neuronal activity.35–37 In agreement with this hypothesis, it has been shown that the GABAA agonist muscimol inhibits N-methyl-D-aspartate–induced neurotoxicity in primary cell cultures.38 Conversely, less clear is the protective role induced by activation of GABAB receptors.

Our data support the view that the neuroprotective effects of tiagabine, vigabatrin, and GABA itself are mediated by the activation of both GABAA and GABAB receptors. To further explore the potential role of presynaptic and/or postsynaptic mechanisms of action in the pharmacological neuroprotection of the striatum after ischemia, we used 2 GABA agonists: muscimol, a GABAA agonist, and baclofen, a GABAB agonist. These agonists showed a neuroprotective effect only when coapplied.

Interestingly, we did not observe a linear relationship between the dose and the protective effect. In fact, for these drugs we obtained a bell-shaped dose-response curve. This finding may have different explanations. It is possible to speculate that high drug concentrations facilitate brain damage. It has been reported that endogenous GABA controls its own release via GABAB autoreceptors.25 Thus, high levels of GABAmimetic drugs reduce the release of endogenous GABA. Alternatively, it can be speculated that excessive activation of GABAA receptor may cause an overload of chloride ions into the neurons, leading to cell swelling.

The role of GABA in brain damage after energy deprivation has been investigated by using several experimental approaches.13,20 A number of studies demonstrated a neuroprotective role exerted by enhancing GABAergic transmission.16–19 Conversely, some in vitro studies found that GABA receptor agonists worsen the cerebral damage caused by energy deprivation.39–41

Previous in vivo studies showed neuroprotective effects of GABAA and GABAB agonists given in isolation.42–44 Conversely, other studies either failed to show such neuroprotection or found relevant side effects associated with the administration of these agonists.44–46 Since our in vitro study clearly shows that coactivation of GABAA and GABAB receptors is required for GABA-mediated protection, future in vivo investigations should be performed to explore this issue further. It is possible that concomitant activation of both receptors would allow achievement of clinically relevant therapeutic effects even with low doses of agonists.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by CNR and MIUR-Cofin grants to Drs Calabresi and Bernardi and by a Progetto Finalizzato Sanità grant to Dr Pisani. We wish to thank M. Tolu for technical assistance.

Received July 21, 2003; revision received September 23, 2003; accepted October 29, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Calabresi P, Centonze D, Bernardi G. Cellular factors controlling neuronal vulnerability in the brain. Neurology. 2000; 55: 1249–1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Calabresi P, Saulle E, Centonze D, Pisani A, Marfia GA, Bernardi G. Post-ischaemic long-term synaptic potentiation in the striatum: a putative mechanism for cell type-specific vulnerability. Brain. 2002; 125: 844–860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Calabresi P, Picconi B, Saulle E, Centonze D, Hainsworth AH, Bernardi G. Is pharmacological neuroprotection dependent on reduced glutamate release? Stroke. 2000; 31: 766–773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Xu ZC, Pulsinelli WA. Responses of CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampus to transient forebrain ischemia: an in vivo intracellular recording study. Neurosci Lett. 1994; 171: 187–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Calabresi P, Centonze D, Pisani A, Sancesario G, Gubellini P, Marfia GA, Bernardi G. Striatal spiny neurons and cholinergic interneurons express differential ionotropic glutamatergic responses and vulnerability: implications for ischemia and Huntington’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1998; 43: 586–597.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Calabresi P, Marfia GA, Centonze D, Pisani A, Bernardi G. Sodium influx plays a major role in the membrane depolarization induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation in rat striatal spiny neurons. Stroke. 1999; 30: 171–179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Nicotera P, Lipton SA. Excitotoxins in neuronal apoptosis and necrosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999; 19: 583–591.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Lipton P. Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79: 1431–1568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. De Keyser J, Sulter G, Luiten PG. Clinical trials with neuroprotective drugs in acute stroke: are we doing the right thing? Trends Neurosci. 2000; 22: 535–540.

10. Gladstone DJ, Black SE, Hakim AM. Toward wisdom from failure: lessons from neuroprotective stroke trials and new therapeutic directions. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2123–2136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Hunter AJ, Green AR, Cross AJ. Animal models of acute ischaemic stroke: can they predict clinically successful neuroprotective drugs? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1995; 16: 123–128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Schwartz RD, Huff RA, Yu X, Carter ML, Bishop M. Post-ischemic diazepam is neuroprotective in the gerbil hippocampus. Brain Res. 1994; 647: 153–160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Schwartz-Bloom RD, Sah R. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (A) neurotransmission and cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem. 2001; 77: 353–371.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Centonze D, Saulle E, Pisani A, Bernardi G, Calabresi P. Adenosine-mediated inhibition of striatal GABAergic synaptic transmission during in vitro ischaemia. Brain. 2001; 124: 1855–1865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Lee J-M, Zipfel GJ, Choi DW. The changing landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms. Nature. 1999; 399 (suppl): A7–A14.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Chen Xu W, Yi Y, Qiu L, Shuaib A. Neuroprotective activity of tiagabine in a focal embolic model of cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2000; 874: 75–77.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Galeffi F, Sinnar S, Schwartz-Bloom RD. Diazepam promotes ATP recovery and prevents cytochrome c release in hippocampal slices after in vitro ischemia. J Neurochem. 2000; 75: 1242–1249.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Schwartz-Bloom RD, Miller KA, Evenson DA, Crain BJ, Nadler JV. Benzodiazepines protect hippocampal neurons from degeneration after transient cerebral ischemia: an ultrastructural study. Neuroscience. 2000; 98: 471–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Calabresi P, Cupini LM, Centonze D, Pisani F, Bernardi G. Antiepileptic drugs as possible neuroprotective strategy in brain ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2003; 53: 693–702.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Green AR, Hainsworth AH, Jackson DM. GABA potentiation: a logical pharmacological approach for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2000; 39: 1483–1494.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Wu Y, Wang W, Richerson GB. Vigabatrin induces tonic inhibition via GABA transporter reversal without increasing vesicular GABA release. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89: 2021–2034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Lewis H, Wallace SJ. Vigabatrin. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001; 43: 833–835.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Angehagen M, Ben-Menachem E, Ronnback L, Hansson E. Novel mechanisms of action of three antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin, tiagabine, and topiramate. Neurochem Res. 2003; 28: 333–340.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Calabresi P, Pisani A, Mercuri NB, Bernardi G. On the mechanisms underlying hypoxia-induced membrane depolarization in striatal neurons. Brain. 1995; 118: 1027–1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Calabresi P, Mercuri NB, De Murtas M, Bernardi G. Involvement of GABA system in feedback regulation of glutamate- and GABA-mediated synaptic potentials in rat neostriatum. J Physiol (Lond). 1991; 440: 581–599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Calabresi P, Centonze D, Cupini LM, Costa C, Pisani F, Bernardi G. Ionotropic glutamate receptors: still a target for neuroprotection in brain ischemia? Insights from in vitro studies. Neurobiol Dis. 2003; 12: 82–88.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Shuaib A, Ijaz S, Kaira J. Gamma-vinyl GABA prevents hippocampal and substantia nigra reticulata damage in repetitive transient forebrain ischemia. Brain Res. 1992; 590: 13–17.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Inglefield JR, Perry JM, Schwartz RD. Postischemic inhibition of GABA reuptake by tiagabine slows neuronal death in the gerbil hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1995; 5: 460–468.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Iqbal S, Baziany A, Gordon S, Wright S, Hussain M, Miyashita H, Shuaib A, Hasan Rajput A. Neuroprotective effect of tiagabine in transient forebrain global ischemia: an in vivo microdialysis, behavioral, and histological study. Brain Res. 2002; 946: 162–170.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Schwartz-Bloom RD, McDonough KJ, Chase PJ, Chadwick LE, Inglefield JR, Levin ED. Long term protection by benzodiazepine full vs partial agonists following transient cerebral ischemia in the gerbil. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998; 18: 548–558.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Schwartz-Bloom RD, Miller KA, Evenson DA, Crain BJ, Nadler JV. Benzodiazepines protect hippocampal neurons from degeneration after transient cerebral ischemia: an ultrastructural study. Neuroscience. 2000; 98: 471–484.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Johansen FF, Diemer NH. Enhancement of GABA neurotransmission after cerebral ischemia in the rat reduces loss of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991; 84: 1–6.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Abel MS, McCandless DW. Elevated {gamma}-aminobutyric acid levels attenuate the metabolic response to bilateral ischemia. J Neurochem. 1992; 58: 740–744.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Shuaib A, Murabit MA, Kanthan R, Howlett W, Wishart T. The neuroprotective effects of gamma-vinyl GABA in transient global ischemia: a morphological study with early and delayed evaluations. Neurosci Lett. 1996; 204: 1–4.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Kanter ED, Kapur A, Haberly LB. A dendritic GABA-A-mediated IPSP regulates facilitation of NMDA-mediated responses to burst stimulation of afferent fibers in piriform cortex. J Neurosci. 1996; 16: 307–312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Riveros N, Orrego F. N-Methylaspartate-activated calcium channels in rat brain cortex slices: effects of calcium channel blockers and of inhibitory and depressant substances. Neuroscience. 1999; 17: 541–546.

37. Saji M, Reis DJ. Delayed transneuronal death of substantia nigra neurons prevented by gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist. Science. 1987; 235: 66–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Ohkuma S, Chen SH, Katsura M, Chen DZ, Kuriyama K. Muscimol prevents neuronal injury induced by NMDA. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1994; 64: 125–128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Muir JK, Lobner D, Monyer H, Choi DW. GABAA receptor activation attenuates excitotoxicity but exacerbates oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced neuronal injury in vitro. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 1211–1218.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Stokes AH, Bernard LP, Nicklas WJ, Zeevalk GD. Attenuation of malonate toxicity in primary mesencephalic cultures using the GABA transport blocker, NO-711. J Neurosci Res. 2001; 64: 43–52.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Erdo S, Michler A, Wolff JR. GABA accelerates excitotoxic cell death in cortical cultures: protection by blockers of GABA-gated chloride channels. Brain Res. 1991; 542: 254–258.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Lal S, Shuaib A, Ijaz S. Baclofen is cytoprotective to cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Neurochem Res. 1995; 20: 115–119.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Babcock AM, Everingham A, Paden CM, Kimura M. Baclofen is neuroprotective and prevents loss of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II immunoreactivity in the ischemic gerbil hippocampus. J Neurosci Res. 2002; 67: 804–811.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Ito H, Watanabe Y, Isshiki A, Uchino H. Neuroprotective properties of propofol and midazolam, but not pentobarbital, on neuronal damage induced by forebrain ischemia, based on the GABAA receptors. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999; 43: 153–162.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Rosenbaum DM, Grotta JC, Pettigrew LC, Ostrow P, Strong R, Rhoades H, Picone CM, Grotta AT. Baclofen does not protect against cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. 1990; 21: 138–140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Jackson-Friedman C, Lyden PD, Nunez S, Jin A, Zweifler R. High dose baclofen is neuroprotective but also causes intracerebral hemorrhage: a quantal bioassay study using the intraluminal suture occlusion method. Exp Neurol. 1997; 147: 346–352.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Costa, V. Belcastro, A. Tozzi, M. Di Filippo, M. Tantucci, S. Siliquini, A. Autuori, B. Picconi, M. G. Spillantini, E. Fedele, et al.
Electrophysiology and Pharmacology of Striatal Neuronal Dysfunction Induced by Mitochondrial Complex I Inhibition
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2008; 28(32): 8040 - 8052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Costa, G. Martella, B. Picconi, C. Prosperetti, A. Pisani, M. Di Filippo, F. Pisani, G. Bernardi, and P. Calabresi
Multiple Mechanisms Underlying the Neuroprotective Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs Against In Vitro Ischemia
Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/596    most recent
01.STR.0000113691.32026.06v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Right arrow Articles by Calabresi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Right arrow Articles by Calabresi, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Energy metabolism
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Neuroprotectors