| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:870.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Correspondence to Rolf Kern, MD, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68135 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail kern{at}neuro.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Thirty-two patients (22 men, 10 women; mean age, 75 years) with plaques of the internal carotid artery as identified by high-resolution B-mode scanning were investigated with real-time compound ultrasound imaging with the use of a 5- to 12-MHz dynamic range linear transducer on a duplex scanner. Two independent observers rated plaque morphology according to a standardized protocol.
Results The majority of plaques was classified as predominantly echogenic and as plaques of irregular surface, whereas ulcerated plaques were rarely observed. The interobserver agreement for plaque surface characterization was good for both compound ultrasound (
=0.72) and conventional B-mode (
=0.65). For the determination of plaque echogenicity, the reproducibility of compound ultrasound (
w=0.83) was even higher than that of conventional B-mode ultrasound (
w=0.74). According to a semiquantitative analysis, real-time compound ultrasound was rated superior in the categories plaque texture resolution, plaque surface definition, and vessel wall demarcation. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction of acoustic shadowing and reverberations.
Conclusions Real-time compound ultrasound is a suitable technique for the characterization of atherosclerotic plaques, showing good general agreement with high-resolution B-mode imaging. This advanced technique allows reduction of ultrasound artifacts and improves the assessment of plaque texture and surface for enhanced evaluation of carotid plaque morphology.
Key Words: carotid artery plaque reproducibility morphology ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One approach to improving ultrasonographic image quality in cerebrovascular applications may be to average several images taken from different perspectives. This hypothesis is supported by the results of in vitro B-mode imaging studies showing that combining scan information from more than 1 angle leads to a significant reduction in the amount of random noise or speckle.8,9 This technique, termed compounding, has been used in experiments to increase signal-to-noise ratio in 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging.9,10 Compound imaging has also been applied in an in vivo 3-dimensional system registering irregularly sampled ultrasound images obtained from different perspectives to maximize vessel wall information of the carotid artery.11 The major obstacle for implementation of compound imaging in routine clinical practice, however, has been the time-consuming offline processing of image data common to all systems. Recently, real-time spatial compound imaging has been made possible through substantial improvements in the computational power of modern ultrasound equipment. First experience with this technique in the field of cerebrovascular ultrasound imaging has demonstrated its ability to improve visualization of atherosclerotic plaques in vitro.12 These experiments were recently complemented by studies in patients with carotid artery disease to show better intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of atherosclerotic disease.13 We hypothesized that real-time compound imaging, by reducing speckle and ultrasound artifacts, could improve the in vivo characterization of carotid artery plaque morphology.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Ultrasound Studies
Consecutive patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis >40% diameter reduction were included in the study and examined by an experienced ultrasonographer. A standardized protocol was used that comprised high-resolution B-mode and real-time compound ultrasound scans from standardized planes of the ICA. Sequential perpendicular cross sections along the axis of the ICA at the maximum extent of the atherosclerotic lesion and parallel longitudinal sections, including the carotid bulb, were displayed. In every case, additional examinations with frequency- and power-based color-coded duplex ultrasound were obtained to determine the degree of the stenosis and to detect ulcers and anechogenic plaques that might be missed in B-mode scans. The average scan time for the complete ultrasound protocol was 10 minutes for each carotid artery, with the scan times of compound ultrasound and conventional B-mode being approximately the same length. All ultrasound investigations were performed on a Philips HDI 5000 duplex scanner (Philips Medical Ultrasound, NL) with a 5- to 12-MHz dynamic range linear transducer. Third-generation SonoCT Real-time Compound Imaging software was applied for compound ultrasound.
The degree of ICA stenosis was determined according to the measured maximum flow velocity and to the local narrowing in percent diameter reduction at the maximum of the stenosis, calculated according to the formula (1-A/B)x100%, where A represents the tightest diameter of stenosis and B the suspected former vessel diameter. For later subgroup analysis, atherosclerotic plaques were stratified for the localization as lesions limited to the far wall, lesions limited to the near wall, and both far and near wall lesions.
The results of each ultrasound investigation were stored digitally. Before presentation to the observers, each image was cropped to exclude patient information and scan specification, referring to the applied technique. The observers were requested to classify each atherosclerotic plaque regarding echogenicity and plaque surface and regarding image quality in 5 different categories. The criteria of data classification are explained below in detail.
Plaque Characterization
The classification of atherosclerotic plaques was performed according to the criteria established by the Consensus Conference concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques.14 Thus, plaque echogenicity and texture are determined in categories from I to V, ranging from the homogeneous, uniformly anechogenic (class I) plaque to the homogeneous, uniformly echogenic (class IV) plaque, as well as mixed forms with the heterogeneous, predominantly hypoechogenic (class II) and the predominantly echogenic (class III) plaques. Unclassified plaques, for example due to excessive shadowing, are considered class V plaques.
The appearance of the plaque surface is defined as (1) smooth and regular; (2) mildly irregular when height variations between 0.4 and 2 mm are seen along the contour of the lesion; or (3) ulcerated when flow vortices with evidence of reversed flow in the color-coded duplex scan and recesses with an extent of at least 2 mm in depth and 2 mm in length and a well-defined back at its base are present.
Assessment of Image Quality
To compare the image quality and visualization of the atherosclerotic plaque, the residual vessel lumen, and surrounding structures of both B-mode techniques, we used a semiquantitative scale of image quality in the 5 categories regarding (A) the determination of the plaque texture resolution, (B) the definition of the plaque surface, (C) the vessel wall demarcation, (D) the amount of acoustic shadowing, and (E) the level of reverberation artifacts.
Categories A to C
In these categories, image quality was rated as good, moderate, or poor by each of the 2 observers in both methods. The determination of plaque texture resolution (A) was considered to be of good quality if the internal structure of the plaque could be visualized entirely and an attribution of the plaque class was easily possible. A good quality of plaque surface definition (B) was assigned if the surface of the plaque was visible in its whole extent without areas of shadowing or other confounding artifacts. Vessel wall demarcation (C) represents a descriptive category for the depiction of arterial walls that might be compromised by artifacts as well as anatomic peculiarities such as, for example, deep localization.
Categories D and E
Reduction or suppression of certain artifacts that typically occur in ultrasound may lead to superior visualization of anatomic or pathological structures. The amount of artifacts was rated as high, low, or absent by each of the 2 observers in both methods. Acoustic shadowing (D) emerges when parallel ultrasound beams hit structures with high attenuation. Extensive shadowing may severely diminish image quality or completely erase the information behind such a structure. In carotid artery plaques, shadowing frequently arises in regions of calcification. Reverberations (E) are artifacts due to incoherent wave interference arising at structures with differing echo intensity and lead to spurious echoes and a granular appearance within an otherwise homogeneous region.
Statistical Analysis
The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of compound ultrasound and conventional B-mode was determined by the analysis of plaque echogenicity and plaque surface. For plaque surface analysis, we used unweighted
statistics since the 3 categories are nominal scales. For plaque echogenicity consisting of 5 categories, a weighted
(
w) was calculated that weighted disagreements involving distant values more heavily than disagreements involving more similar values.15 For plaque classes I to IV, ratings of I and IV for the same plaque were weighted heavily (w=1), disagreements between I and III or II and IV were weighted as w=2/3, and all other disagreements were given low weightings (w=1/3). Since class V represents unclassifiable plaques, ratings of class V and any other class all were weighted equally (w=1/3).
and
w were indicated including 95% CIs.
For comparing image quality, semiquantitative data from the aforementioned categories (A to E) were analyzed stratified by observer. A
2 test was performed to determine differences between the methods. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with the SAS software package (version 8.2).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Definition of Plaque Echogenicity and Surface
An overview of the interobserver agreement for both compound ultrasound and conventional B-mode is given in Tables 1 and 2
. The majority of plaques was classified as predominantly echogenic and as plaques with irregular surface. Plaque ulcers were rarely observed. Fifteen atherosclerotic plaques were limited to the near vessel wall, 11 lesions were limited to the far wall, and 17 lesions involved both far and near walls.
|
|
Table 1 illustrates the results for the characterization of plaque echogenicity.
w values indicate a good reproducibility for both methods, with even higher values when compound ultrasound was used. The intraobserver reproducibility was also good with
w=0.66 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.70) for observer 1 and
w=0.78 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.82) for observer 2.
In a subanalysis comparing the reproducibility in atherosclerotic lesions according to their position in the vessel wall, the interobserver agreement with the use of conventional B-mode had a tendency toward higher values in the far wall (
w=0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.0) than in the near wall (
w=0.57; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87). With the use of compound ultrasound, the reproducibility was excellent in the far wall (
=1.0) but also high in the near wall (
w=0.70; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.0). The significance of this subanalysis is limited by large and overlapping CIs due to the small sample size.
Table 2 shows the results for the characterization of plaque surface. The interobserver agreement was high, with approximately equal
values for both methods. The intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for observer 1, with
=0.51 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.75), and was good for observer 2, with
=0.69 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.90).
Comparison of Image Quality
Table 3 shows the overall results of the semiquantitative analysis of image quality evaluated in different categories with the use of real-time compound ultrasound and conventional B-mode. With the use of compound ultrasound, plaque texture resolution (A) was rated superior in 41.9% by observer 1 and in 44.2% by observer 2. The plaque surface definition (B) was considered superior in 41.9% and in 32.6%, respectively. Vessel wall demarcation (C) was improved in 39.5% and in 44.2%. The amount of acoustic shadowing (D) was considered to be less in 30.2% and in 44.2%. The level of reverberation artifacts (E) was reduced in 48.8% and in 55.8%. For all 5 categories (A to E), the difference between the 2 observers reached the level of statistical significance. The strongest improvement of image quality was noted for plaques that produced shadowing artifacts (classes III and IV), followed by hypoechoic plaques (class I). The improvement was of lesser importance in class II plaques, and the improvement was equally distributed in the plaque surface categories. Two examples of ICA plaques visualized by both sonographic techniques are given in Figures 2 and 3
.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Improved visualization of the plaque surface and better delineation of vessel walls with compound imaging should provide new opportunities for enhanced detection and characterization of plaque ulcerations. Previous attempts to describe plaque surface structure with B-mode ultrasound have been disappointing. Although a relatively good differentiation between smooth, irregular, and ulcerative plaque surfaces has been obtained for postmortem carotid artery specimens,16 the in vivo accuracy compared with findings at carotid endarterectomy has been considerably poorer.7,17,18 B-mode imaging has not provided a satisfactory diagnostic yield for ulcerative plaques, with a sensitivity of <50%.17 It is important to remember, however, that our current concepts on the role of ultrasound imaging for detection and characterization of plaque ulceration stem primarily from studies performed >10 years ago. These studies were undertaken with equipment that does not provide image quality comparable to that of modern advanced ultrasound imaging techniques. We could not confirm the advantage of compound ultrasound for the assessment of plaque ulceration since ulcerated lesions were detected rarely in our population. This technique, however, might be the preferred imaging modality to use in new studies for characterization of the role of plaque ulceration as a marker of plaque vulnerability.
Real-time compound imaging may be equally beneficial for improved acquisition of 3- and 4-dimensional ultrasound data to perform 3-dimensional renderings and to analyze plaque motion. We have previously reported the usefulness of such techniques in evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke.19 By using real-time compound imaging, the quality of 3-dimensional images can be improved considerably because of better delineation of the arterial walls. Moreover, improved demarcation of the plaque surface allows superior performance of plaque motion algorithms (R. Kern, MD, et al, unpublished data, 2002).
The present study also demonstrates improved visualization of plaque echogenicity. Carotid artery plaques of homogeneous, moderate-intensity echogenicity consist mainly of fibrotic tissue.4,16 Such plaques rarely show ulceration, perhaps accounting for the lack of a significant correlation between homogeneous echogenicity and the occurrence of focal cerebral ischemia. Heterogeneous plaques represent matrix deposition, cholesterol accumulation, necrosis, calcification, and intraplaque hemorrhage.4 Several studies have demonstrated that high-resolution B-mode scanning can characterize echomorphologic features of carotid plaques that correlate with histopathological criteria.17 Although echolucent areas within the plaque may represent thrombotic material or hemorrhage, lipid accumulation may produce similar echogenicity.4,14 Recent studies using ultrasound integrated backscatter for the noninvasive assessment of plaque tissue composition reported promising results with a good correlation for different plaque components in comparison to histopathological analysis.20
Plaque calcification produces acoustic shadowing. Depending on the location of the plaque and on the extent of calcification, acoustic shadowing can be a major obstacle for adequate ultrasonographic visualization. Furthermore, artifacts arising from clutter, side lobes, grating lobes, multi-path reverberations in the vessel lumen, and artifacts from interjacent tissue between transducer and vessel may result in diminished perceptibility of an atherosclerotic lesion. Especially in hypoechoic plaques, those reverberations in the vessel lumen can make it difficult to judge the precise extent of the atherosclerotic lesion.13 The results of our study show that compound imaging can reduce the amount of acoustic shadowing and reverberations to allow enhanced evaluation of plaque structure.
Improved evaluation of plaque morphology with real-time compound imaging may aid in further studies designed to establish an association between plaque echogenicity and cerebrovascular events. Initial studies reported an association between heterogeneous plaques and the occurrence of cerebrovascular events.21,22 Other investigations of endarterectomy specimens also suggested a correlation between intraplaque hemorrhage and transient ischemic attacks and stroke.23 Other studies, however, could not confirm these observations.24 Whether differences in plaque echogenicity can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques continues to be a matter of debate. While some contend that heterogeneous carotid plaques are more often associated with intraplaque hemorrhage and neurological events,25,26 recent studies have provided good evidence that lipid-rich plaques are more prone to rupture and suggest that an association between intraplaque hemorrhage and a high lipid content as revealed in B-mode ultrasound may support this theory.27 The presence of hypoechoic ICA plaques has also been reported as an independent risk factor for cerebrovascular events.28,29 The application of compound B-mode imaging for enhanced evaluation of plaque morphology may additionally provide data to help elucidate the relationship between plaque echogenicity and the risk of plaque embolism.
The design and the sample size of this study were not intended to evaluate a possible association between the improvement of sonographic image quality and the prediction of recurrent strokes. Furthermore, our results were not compared with a standard control that would be a histopathological analysis of endarterectomy specimens. Nevertheless, this study provides useful information on the value of compound ultrasound in the clinical setting and implies that this technique has the potential to play an advantageous role in future investigations of plaque surface structure and plaque echogenicity as markers of plaque vulnerability.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that real-time compound ultrasound is an advanced method for the characterization of atherosclerotic plaques with good agreement with high-resolution B-mode imaging. Image quality is improved because of better structural differentiation and suppression of artifacts. The potential of this method may involve better diagnostic confidence, including precise visualization of morphological details, identification of early lesions, and superior follow-up.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 25, 2003; revision received December 17, 2003; accepted December 22, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. AbuRahma AF, Wulu JT Jr, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002; 33: 17721775.
3. Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ, Nicolaides AN, El Atrozy TS, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Geroulakos G. Hemispheric symptoms and carotid plaque echomorphology. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 3949.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Goes E, Janssens W, Maillet B, Freson M, Steyaert L, Osteaux M. Tissue characterization of atheromatous plaques: correlation between ultrasound image and histological findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990; 18: 611617.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Meairs S, Hennerici M. Four-dimensional ultrasonographic characterization of plaque surface motion in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 1999; 30: 18071813.
6. Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Beach KW, Gordon D, Detmer PR, Burns DH, Alpers C, Strandness DE Jr. Carotid plaque morphology and clinical events. Stroke. 1997; 28: 95100.
7. Droste DW, Karl M, Bohle RM, Kaps M. Comparison of ultrasonic and histopathological features of carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Res. 1997; 19: 380384.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Jespersen SK, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. Multi-angle compound imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 1998; 20: 81102.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Barry CD, Allott CP, John NW, Mellor PM, Arundel PA, Thomson DS, Waterton JC. Three-dimensional freehand ultrasound: image reconstruction and volume analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23: 12091224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Rohling RN, Gee AH, Berman L. Automatic registration of 3-D ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998; 24: 841854.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Meairs S, Beyer J, Hennerici M. Reconstruction and visualization of irregularly sampled three- and four-dimensional ultrasound data for cerebrovascular applications. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26: 263272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Jespersen SK, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. In vitro spatial compound scanning for improved visualization of atherosclerosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26: 13571362.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Kofoed SC, Gronholdt ML, Wilhjelm JE, Bismuth J, Sillesen H. Real-time spatial compound imaging improves reproducibility in the evaluation of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001; 27: 13111317.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. De Bray JM, Baud JM, Dauzat M. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997; 7: 289296.[CrossRef]
15. Cicchetti DV, Allison T. A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings. Am J EEG Technol. 1971; 11: 101109.
16. Hennerici M, Reifschneider G, Trockel U, Aulich A. Detection of early atherosclerotic lesions by duplex scanning of the carotid artery. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984; 12: 455464.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Comerota AJ, Katz ML, White JV, Grosh JD. The preoperative diagnosis of the ulcerated carotid atheroma. J Vasc Surg. 1990; 11: 505510.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Widder B, Paulat K, Hackspacher J, Hamann H, Hutschenreiter S, Kreutzer C, Ott F, Vollmar J. Morphological characterization of carotid artery stenoses by ultrasound duplex scanning. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16: 349354.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Meairs S, Timpe L, Beyer J, Hennerici M. Acute aphasia and hemiplegia during karate training. Lancet. 2000; 356: 40.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Bridal SL, Beyssen B, Fornes P, Julia P, Berger G. Multiparametric attenuation and backscatter images for characterization of carotid plaque. Ultrason Imaging. 2000; 22: 2034.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Bluth EI, Kay D, Merritt CRB, Sullivan M, Farr G, Mills NL. Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 10611065.
22. Langsfeld M, Gray Weale AC, Lusby RJ. The role of plaque morphology and diameter reduction in the development of new symptoms in asymptomatic carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg. 1989; 9: 548557.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Fisher M, Blumenfeld AM, Smith TW. The importance of carotid artery plaque disruption and hemorrhage. Arch Neurol. 1987; 44: 10861089.
24. Lennihan L, Kupsky WJ, Mohr JP, Hauser WA, Correll JW, Quest DO. Lack of association between carotid plaque hematoma and ischemic cerebral symptoms. Stroke. 1987; 18: 879881.
25. Park AE, McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH, Matsumura JS, Yao JS. Carotid plaque morphology correlates with presenting symptomatology. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 872878.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Golledge J, Cuming R, Ellis M, Davies AH, Greenhalgh RM. Carotid plaque characteristics and presenting symptom. Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 16971701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Wiebe BM, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H. Echo-lucency of computerized ultrasound images of carotid atherosclerotic plaques are associated with increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as well as increased plaque lipid content. Circulation. 1998; 97: 3440.
28. Polak JF, Shemanski L, OLeary DH, Lefkowitz D, Price TR, Savage PJ, Brant WE, Reid C. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older: Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998; 208: 649654.
29. Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the Tromso study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 21712175.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Xiong, Y.-B. Deng, Y. Zhu, Y.-N. Liu, and X.-J. Bi Correlation of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization Detected by Using Contrast-enhanced US with Clinical Symptoms Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. I. Lobbes, R.-J. J. H. M. Miserus, S. Heeneman, V. Lima Passos, P. H. A. Mutsaers, N. Debernardi, B. Misselwitz, M. Post, M. J. A. P. Daemen, J. M. A. van Engelshoven, et al. Atherosclerosis: Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Vessel Wall in Rabbit Model--Comparison of Gadofosveset and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 682 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vicenzini, M. C. Ricciardi, F. Puccinelli, M. Altieri, N. Vanacore, V. Di Piero, and G. L. Lenzi Sonographic Carotid Plaque Morphologic Characteristics and Vascular Risk Factors: Results From a Population Study J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2008; 27(9): 1313 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Caplan A 70-Year-Old Man With a Transient Ischemic Attack: Review of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis JAMA, July 2, 2008; 300(1): 81 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Kwee, R. J. van Oostenbrugge, L. Hofstra, G. J. Teule, J.M.A. van Engelshoven, W. H. Mess, and M. E. Kooi Identifying vulnerable carotid plaques by noninvasive imaging Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24_Part_2): 2401 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Alonso, A. Della Martina, M. Stroick, M. Fatar, M. Griebe, S. Pochon, M. Schneider, M. Hennerici, E. Allemann, and S. Meairs Molecular Imaging of Human Thrombus With Novel Abciximab Immunobubbles and Ultrasound Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1508 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |