Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:1095-1099
Published online before print April 1, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125720.02983.fe
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/5/1095    most recent
01.STR.0000125720.02983.fev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winbeck, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winbeck, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks

(Stroke. 2004;35:1095.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke Can Be Differentiated by Analyzing Early Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Signal Intensity Changes

Kerstin Winbeck, MD; Kathrin Bruckmaier; Thorleif Etgen, MD; Helga Gräfin von Einsiedel, MD; M. Röttinger, MD Dirk Sander, MD

From Departments of Neurology (K.W., K.B., T.E., D.S.) and Neuroradiology (H.G.v.E., M.R.), Technical University of Munich, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Kerstin Winbeck, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Möhlstr. 28, 81675 Munich, Germany. E-mail Kerstin.Winbeck{at}neuro.med.tu-muenchen.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been established to diagnose acute cerebral ischemia. Signal intensity changes occur not only in patients with definite stroke but also in up to 67% of transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients. We investigated the predictive value of DWI signal intensity changes to distinguish between TIA and stroke.

Methods— Clinical data, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and DWI were collected in 60 consecutive patients with TIA and 37 consecutive patients with stroke. DWI was performed within 24 hours after symptom onset. Using an image analyzing system, we calculated the ratio of the lesion and corresponding contralateral normal tissue average signal intensity (rAI).

Results— Eighteen of 60 TIA patients (30%) revealed focal abnormalities on DWI. The mean duration of symptoms was 5.3 hours in TIA patients with DWI lesions and 5.2 hours in patients without lesions. The time to DWI was comparable in TIA and stroke patients. Even within 6 hours after symptom onset, the signal intensity was significantly higher (P=0.03) in stroke patients (n=13, rAI=1.26) as compared with TIA patients with DWI lesions (n=9, rAI=1.16).

Conclusions— Our data indicate that already within 6 hours after symptom onset, TIA and stroke might be differentiated by analyzing the signal intensity of the lesions.


Key Words: cerebral ischemia, transient • stroke


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become an established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for the diagnosis of acute cerebral ischemia.1–3 In most cases, this technique is superior to conventional MRI and computed tomography (CT).4,5 Interestingly, recent studies using DWI described relevant focal abnormalities in up to 67% of patients with clinical TIA.6–8 As a consequence of these findings, the transient ischemic attack (TIA) working group suggested a new definition of TIA as a brief episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain or retinal ischemia, with clinical symptoms lasting <1 hour and without evidence of acute infarction.9 Kidwell et al6 performed DWI in TIA and stroke patients and reported a significantly less abnormal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map in TIA as compared with stroke patients. However, none of the recent investigators analyzed the ability of DWI signal intensity changes to differentiate between TIA and stroke at early stages after symptom onset. We evaluated whether it is possible to differentiate TIA and minor stroke (NIHSS <=5) by analyzing DWI signal intensities within a few hours after symptom onset. Regarding the recently proposed new definition of TIA,9 we evaluated the subgroup of TIA patients with a symptom duration of <1 hour and those with >1 hour in more detail.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Selection of Patients
Between May 2000 and 2003, 762 first-ever ischemic stroke patients and 224 first-ever TIA patients have been treated at the stroke unit of the department of neurology. In 471 stroke patients, the DWI was performed during 24 hours after symptom onset; 434 stroke patients were excluded because of NIHSS score >5 (n=368) or brain stem or cerebellar infarction (n=66). The remaining 37 patients (NIHSS <=5, 18 men, mean age 64.7 years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.6, 68.9) were included. In the TIA group with anterior circulation symptoms (n=124), the DWI was performed within 24 hours after symptom onset in 60 patients (41 men, mean age 61.6 years). TIA was defined as an acute transient focal neurological deficit caused by vascular disease that reversed totally within 24 hours.10 The following data were collected: age, sex, duration of symptoms, time to DWI, body mass index, and presence of vascular risk factors as coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and atrial fibrillation. The clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Demographic Data and Cardiovascular Risk Factors of TIA and Stroke Patients

MRI
MRI was performed within 24 hours after symptom onset in all patients. We performed transverse T1 (TR/TE 654/14 ms), transverse T2 (TR/TE 3305/132 ms), and at least 1 DWI sequence, usually a transverse and, in doubtful cases, a sagittal or coronal plane using a 1.5-Tesla MRI (Magnetom Symphony; Siemens Medical Systems). The DWI imaging parameters were: TR, 4006 ms; TE, 83 ms; slice thickness, 4 to 6 mm; gap, 1.5 mm; 128x128-pixel matrix; field of view (FOV), 220x220 mm; and pixel size, 1.72x1.72 mm. The gradient strength was 30 mT/m. The b-values were 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2. Maps of the ADC were obtained by a linear least-square fit on a pixel-by-pixel basis after averaging of the direction-dependent DWI. DWI and ADC were analyzed for signal intensity changes by an experienced neuroradiologist (H.E.) and an independent experienced neurologist, both blinded to the definitive diagnosis. A DWI scan was considered positive if, in addition to hyperintensity on the b=1000 image, a corresponding hypointensity was seen on the ADC map. In doubtful cases, we additionally analyzed a second DWI using a sagittal or coronal plane. The regions of hyperintensity on the b=1000 image and hypodensity on the ADC images were analyzed by manually outlining the regions of interest using an image-analyzing system (Sigma Scan Pro; SPSS) as described recently.11 Using this software, the ratio between the lesion and corresponding normal contralateral tissue average signal intensity (rAI) on b=1000 images (rAIb=1000) was calculated. The quantitative mean ADC values of the corresponding hypointensive lesions and the corresponding normal contralateral tissue were analyzed using the Siemens syngo MR 2002B software. For further analysis—to control for differences in absolute ADC values at any given scan and permit more meaningful comparisons between groups—we used the ADC ratio (rAIADC) between the lesion and mirrored contralateral normal tissue as described recently.6,12 If multiple lesions or noncontiguous abnormalities were noted, the ratio was calculated by summing up individual average intensities of all abnormal lesions and dividing the resulting value by the average intensity of the mirrored contralateral corresponding normal brain areas. Figure 1 gives an example for the measurement.



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. DWI and rAI measurement in a patient with TIA (left) and stroke (right) using the b=1000 image performed 8 hours after symptom onset in both cases. In the TIA patient, the rAIb=1000 was 1.21, and it was 1.25 for the stroke patient.

Statistical Analysis
All values are given as mean and 95% CI. Between-group comparisons were performed with {chi}2 and Student t test for normally distributed data. For abnormally distributed data, the Wilcoxon test was used. A 1-way ANOVA was applied to analyze the signal intensity changes over time in TIA and stroke patients. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between time to DWI and average signal intensity in TIA and stroke, as well as the symptom duration and the average signal intensity in TIA patients. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, plotting sensitivity versus 100% minus percent specificity to examine the predictive value for different rAI using Graph Pad Prism 4. Optimum cutoff values with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Overall accuracy of the diagnosis was expressed by the area under the curve, ranging from 0.5 to 1. A value of 1 implies perfect sensitivity and specificity, whereas a value of 0.5 implies that the model’s accuracy is not better than chance.13 Generally, a value of >0.7 can be interpreted as reasonable and a value >0.8 indicates good accuracy.14


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
TIA Group
Eighteen TIA patients (30%) showed focal abnormalities on DWI. The mean time to DWI did not differ significantly between the TIA patients with and without DWI signal intensity changes (Table 2). The basic characteristics of the TIA patients with and without DWI abnormalities are given in Table 2. The occurrence of DWI hyperintensity was not significantly associated with the duration of the TIA. The mean duration of symptoms in TIA patients with pathological DWI was 5.3 hours and was 5.2 hours in patients without signal intensity changes. We found no correlation between the rAIb=1000 and rAIADC and TIA duration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Demographic Data of the TIA Patients With and Without DWI Abnormality

TIA With Symptom Duration of 1 Hour or Less
In 25 TIA patients, the symptoms disappeared within 1 hour. Eight of 25 (32%) of these patients showed signal intensity changes on DWI. This proportion of DWI changes was similar to the DWI abnormalities in TIA patients with symptom duration of >1 hour (29%) (Table 3). No significant differences for several cardiovascular risk factors, the time to DWI, the rAIb=1000, and rAIADC was found (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Demographic Data of the TIA Patients With Duration of Symptoms Less Than 1 Hour and More Than 1 Hour

TIA With DWI During Symptoms
In 19 TIA patients, the DWI was performed during symptom duration. The mean duration of symptoms was 10.4 hours (95% CI: 6.2, 14.6) and the mean time to DWI was 7.3 (95% CI: 3.6, 11.0). In 8 of 19 (42%) of these patients, the DWI showed signal intensity changes. The mean duration of symptoms and time to DWI was comparable in TIA with and without DWI lesions in this group. Moreover, the mean rAIb=1000 and rAIADC in TIA patients with (n=9) and without (n=9) symptoms during DWI were comparable (rAIb=1000 1.17 [95% CI: 1.09, 1.25] versus 1.17 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.22] and rAIADC 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.91] versus 0.87 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.94]).

Comparison of TIA and Stroke Patients
We observed a significantly lower NIHSS in the TIA group and a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation in the stroke group. The other basic characteristics (vascular risk factors, the time to DWI, and the area of hyperintensity) were comparable (Table 1). There was no correlation between the rAIb=1000 and the time to DWI. Compared with TIA patients, in stroke patients, the rAIb=1000 was significantly higher (1.30 versus 1.17, P<0.001) and the rAIADC was significantly lower (0.73 versus 0.86; P<0.001, Table 1).

The DWI was performed in 21 (35%) TIA and 14 (38%) stroke patients within 6 hours after symptom onset, in 12 (20%) TIA and 10 (27%) stroke patients between 6 and 12 hours after symptom onset, and in 27 (45%) TIA and 13 (35%) stroke patients between 12 and 24 hours after symptom onset. Eight TIA patients in the first group (38%), 4 in the second group (33%), and 6 in the third group (22%) showed DWI abnormalities. At all time intervals, the rAIb=1000 (Figure 2 upper) and the rAIADC (Figure 2, lower) were significantly different in stroke patients compared with TIA patients. Regarding the subgroup of TIA patients in whom the DWI was performed during symptoms, we also found a significant difference between the rAIb=1000 (1.17 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.21] versus 1.29 [95% CI: 1.26, 1.34]; P<0.001) and the rAIADC (0.86 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.91] versus 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.77]; P=0.01) as compared with stroke patients.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The rAI on b=1000 (upper) and ADC maps (lower) in TIA and stroke patients for different time intervals. The rAIb=1000 and the rAIADC were significantly different in TIA and stroke patients for every time interval.

ROC curve analysis revealed a good value for the area under the curve (0.85 for rAIb=1000 and 0.82 for the rAIADC; Figure 3). For rAIb=1000 <1.21, the sensitivity for TIA was 78%, with a specificity of 76% and a positive predictive value of 89%. Concerning a rAIADC >0.82, the sensitivity was 71%, the specificity 72%, and the positive predictive value 73%. For the combination of the ADC and b=1000 values, no improvement in sensitivity and specificity could be found using ROC curve analysis. We additionally performed the ROC curve analysis using the ipsilateral quantitative ADC values and found an area under the curve of 0.62, which indicates an insufficient accuracy to distinguish between TIA and stroke.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. ROC curve analysis for the rAIb=1000 (upper) and rAIADC (lower) in TIA and stroke patients. In both analyses, the area under the curve shows good accuracy (>0.8) for the discrimination between TIA and stroke using rAI measurements on b=1000 and ADC maps. The arrow indicates the best cutoff value.

In patients in which the DWI was performed within 6 hours after symptom onset (8 TIA and 14 stroke patients), the area under the curve was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.00; P=0.04) for rAIADC and was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.98; P=0.01) for rAIb=1000. The sensitivity and specificity of the rAIb=1000 were 89% and 63% and were 71% and 67% for rAIADC.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main finding of our study was that even within 6 hours after symptom onset, patients with minor stroke and TIA could be differentiated by analyzing the signal intensity changes on DWI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that demonstrates an increased signal intensity on the b=1000 image and a reduced intensity on the ADC maps in stroke patients as compared with TIA patients with DWI abnormalities. One might argue that the DWI reveals no additional clinical information, because the time to DWI was longer than the symptom duration in the TIA group. However, we also found a significant difference in rAIb=1000 and rAIADC in the subgroup of TIA patients, in whom the DWI was performed during acute symptoms, as compared with the stroke patients.

Our findings are in accordance with the data of Kidwell et al.6 They described a significantly decreased ADC value in stroke patients as compared with TIA patients. Thirty-eight percent of the TIA patients within the first 6 hours after symptom onset and only 22% within 12 to 24 hours after symptom onset showed signal intensity changes. These results may be explained by the transient nature of DWI changes, probably caused by early reperfusion. This explanation supported by experimental studies reporting a rapid disappearance of DWI hyperintensity and ADC normalization in transient focal cerebral ischemia.15,16 Weber et al17 reported less abnormal ADC values in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) compared with stroke patients without thrombolysis. In experimental stroke models, an ADC decrease during the first 28 hours after stroke onset was reported.18

The incidence of DWI abnormalities in TIA patients (30%) was comparable with the results of other investigations (21% to 67%).6–8,19,20 The lower incidence of DWI changes in our study compared with that of Rovira et al7 might be explained by a very strict definition of DWI abnormalities in our investigation. DWI abnormalities had to be confirmed by a corresponding ADC decrease and, in doubtful cases, additionally by a corresponding DWI change in a sagittal or coronal image. Crisostomo et al8 used similar MRI criteria and observed DWI changes in 21% of their TIA patients. A short latency between onset of symptoms and DWI in our investigation compared with all other studies might also explain the lower incidence of DWI changes in our study. Li et al15 reported that after a 10- and 30-minute occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in rats, initial DWI hyperintensity disappeared soon after reperfusion. In the 30-minute group, delayed DWI changes occurred within 12 hours. Ringer et al21 described a recurrence of DWI abnormalities within 1 day after ischemia in an experimental stroke model.

Crisostomo et al8 described a patient with a pathological DWI and a TIA lasting only 40 seconds. They pointed out that the duration of symptoms is an inadequate determinant for having TIA or stroke. In our study population, we also observed a high variation of symptom duration. Because we found a similar incidence of DWI abnormalities in patients with TIA duration <1 hour and >1 hour, in our opinion, even the proposed new definition of TIA9 should be critically reviewed. As mentioned by Brown et al,22 we suggest that the definition of TIA remains a purely clinical one, but that the time from onset to complete resolution of symptoms and signs should be changed from 24 hours to 1 hour. Ballotta et al23 pointed out that in case of DWI changes, TIA should be termed "transient stroke."

In our opinion, the results of our study are important for clinical practice because they describe the usefulness of analyzing the ratio of the average intensity on b=1000 and ADC images to differentiate between TIA and stroke, even within 6 hours after and during symptom onset. The predictive value of the rAIb=1000 and rAIADC was similar, with a trend toward a better discrimination between TIA and stroke using the rAIb=1000. From a clinical point of view, we postulate that the rAIb=1000 might be more useful because of a better contrast of the hyperintensity compared with normal brain. Another important finding of our study is the good discrimination accuracy between TIA and stroke by measuring the rAI. The area under the ROC curve was >0.8 and therefore implies good predictive power. Now, further prospective studies are necessary to verify and test the usefulness of these cutoff values to distinguish TIA and stroke.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that TIA and stroke can be differentiated even within 6 hours after symptom onset by analyzing the average signal intensity either on b=1000 or on ADC maps using DWI.

Received November 2, 2003; revision received January 13, 2004; accepted January 22, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Albers GW. Diffusion-weighted MRI for evaluation of acute stroke. Neurology. 1998; 51: S47–S49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Jansen O, Ringleb PA, Mohr A, Steiner T, Heiland S, Schwab S, Pohlers O, Ryssel H, Orakcioglu B, Sartor K, Hacke W. Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2001; 49: 460–469.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Yoneda Y, Tokui K, Hanihara T, Kitagaki H, Tabuchi M, Mori E. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: detection of ischemic injury 39 minutes after onset in a stroke patient. Ann Neurol. 1999; 45: 794–797.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Beaulieu C, Marks MP. Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and CT in acute stroke. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1557–1561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Fiebach J, Jansen O, Schellinger P, Knauth M, Hartmann M, Heiland S, Ryssel H, Pohlers O, Hacke W, Sartor K. Comparison of CT with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with hyperacute stroke. Neuroradiology. 2001; 43: 628–632.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Kidwell CS, Alger JR, Di Salle F, Starkman S, Villablanca P, Bentson J, Saver JL. Diffusion MRI in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1174–1180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Rovira A, Rovira-Gols A, Pedraza S, Grive E, Molina C, Alvarez-Sabin J. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the acute phase of transient ischemic attacks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 77–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Crisostomo RA, Garcia MM, Tong DC. Detection of diffusion-weighted MRI abnormalities in patients with transient ischemic attack: correlation with clinical characteristics. Stroke. 2003; 34: 932–937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, Fayad PB, Mohr JP, Saver JL, Sherman DG. Transient ischemic attack–proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1713–1716.[Free Full Text]

10. Special report from the national institute of neurological disorders and stroke. Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke. 1990; 21: 637–676.[Free Full Text]

11. Sander D, Winbeck K, Klingelhofer J, Etgen T, Conrad B. Prognostic relevance of pathological sympathetic activation after acute thromboembolic stroke. Neurology. 2001; 57: 833–838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Schwamm LH, Koroshetz WJ, Sorensen AG, Wang B, Copen WA, Budzik R, Rordorf G, Buonanno FS, Schaefer PW, Gonzalez RG. Time course of lesion development in patients with acute stroke: serial diffusion- and hemodynamic-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2268–2276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the area under the ROC curve. Stat Med. 2002; 21: 3093–3106.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Nagai Y, Kitagawa K, Yamagami H, Kondo K, Hougaku H, Hori M, Matsumoto M. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and plaque score for the risk assessment of stroke subtypes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 1239–1243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Li F, Liu KF, Silva MD, Omae T, Sotak CH, Fenstermacher JD, Fisher M, Hsu CY, Lin W. Transient and permanent resolution of ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after brief periods of focal ischemia in rats: correlation with histopathology. Stroke. 2000; 31: 946–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Neumann-Haefelin T, Kastrup A, de Crespigny A, Yenari MA, Ringer T, Sun GH, Moseley ME. Serial MRI after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: dynamics of tissue injury, blood-brain barrier damage, and edema formation. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1965–1972;discussion 1972–1963.

17. Weber J, Mattle HP, Heid O, Remonda L, Schroth G. Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischaemic stroke: a follow-up study. Neuroradiology. 2000; 42: 184–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Ahlhelm F, Reith W. [Modern diagnosis in acute cerebral infarct. Diffusion weighted imaging and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) calculations]. Nervenarzt. 2002; 73: 736–744.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Engelter ST, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR, Alberts MJ. Diffusion MR imaging and transient ischemic attacks. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2762–2763.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Takayama H, Mihara B, Kobayashi M, Hozumi A, Sadanaga H, Gomi S. [Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of transient ischemic attacks]. No To Shinkei. 2000; 52: 919–923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Ringer TM, Neumann-Haefelin T, Sobel RA, Moseley ME, Yenari MA. Reversal of early diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities does not necessarily reflect tissue salvage in experimental cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2362–2369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986; 232: 34–47.[Free Full Text]

23. Ballotta E, Toniato A, Baracchini C. Transient ischemic attack–proposed new definition. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1607–1609;author reply: 1607–1609.[Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. D. Easton, J. L. Saver, G. W. Albers, M. J. Alberts, S. Chaturvedi, E. Feldmann, T. S. Hatsukami, R. T. Higashida, S. C. Johnston, C. S. Kidwell, et al.
Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists.
Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 2276 - 2293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Mlynash, J-M Olivot, D. C. Tong, M. G. Lansberg, I. Eyngorn, S. Kemp, M. E. Moseley, and G. W. Albers
Yield of combined perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in hemispheric TIA
Neurology, March 31, 2009; 72(13): 1127 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
L. R. Caplan
Transient Ischemic Attack With Abnormal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results: What's in a Name?
Arch Neurol, August 1, 2007; 64(8): 1080 - 1082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. N.E. Redgrave, S. B. Coutts, U. G. Schulz, D. Briley, and P. M. Rothwell
Systematic Review of Associations Between the Presence of Acute Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Clinical Predictors of Early Stroke Risk After Transient Ischemic Attack
Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1482 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. Oppenheim, C. Lamy, E. Touze, D. Calvet, M. Hamon, J.-L. Mas, and J.-F. Meder
Do transient ischemic attacks with diffusion-weighted imaging abnormalities correspond to brain infarctions?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1782 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Rojas, A. Martin, C. Justicia, C. Falcon, N. Bargallo, A. Chamorro, and A. M. Planas
Modest MRI Signal Intensity Changes Precede Delayed Cortical Necrosis After Transient Focal Ischemia in the Rat
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1525 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K Winbeck, T Etgen, H G von Einsiedel, M Rottinger, and D Sander
DWI in transient global amnesia and TIA: proposal for an ischaemic origin of TGA
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 76(3): 438 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/5/1095    most recent
01.STR.0000125720.02983.fev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winbeck, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winbeck, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks