Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:1264-1268
Published online before print April 29, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000127810.92616.78
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/1264    most recent
01.STR.0000127810.92616.78v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dementia
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2004;35:1264.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Dementia After Stroke

The Framingham Study

Cristina S. Ivan, MD; Sudha Seshadri, MD; Alexa Beiser, PhD; Rhoda Au, PhD; Carlos S. Kase, MD; Margaret Kelly-Hayes, RN, EdD Philip A. Wolf, MD

From the Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (C.S.I., S.S., R.A., C.S.K., M.K.-H., P.A.W.) and the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (A.B.), Boston University, Mass.

Correspondence to Philip A. Wolf, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany Street, B-608, Boston, MA 02118-2526. E-mail pawolf{at}bu.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Identification of risk factors for dementia after stroke is best performed in comparison with stroke-free controls, because older subjects at high risk for stroke also have a substantial risk of dementia in the absence of stroke. Previous case-control studies were hospital-based. We used a nested case-control design to prospectively evaluate these risk factors in the community-based Framingham Study cohort.

Methods— We compared 212 subjects who were free of dementia in January 1982 and sustained a first stroke after this date, with 1060 age- and sex-matched, stroke- and dementia-free controls. We calculated 10-year risks of dementia (by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Volume IV criteria) developing in cases and controls and also estimated the hazard ratios within subgroups defined by exposure to various demographic factors (age, gender, education), stroke-related features (right or left hemisphere, stroke type, second stroke), stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, smoking) and apolipoprotein E genotype.

Results— Dementia developed in 19.3% of cases and 11.0% of controls. Baseline stroke doubled the risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 3.1) and adjustment for age, sex, education, and exposure to individual stroke risk factors did not diminish the risk (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.7). The HR was higher in younger subjects (age younger than 80 years [HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.5]), apolipoprotein E 3/3 homozygotes (HR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.0 to 5.8), and high school graduates (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.9).

Conclusion— Stroke increases a subject’s risk of dementia as compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Primary and secondary prevention of stroke should significantly decrease the risk of all dementia.


Key Words: dementia • vascular diseases • stroke • epidemiology • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
More than 700 000 strokes occur each year in the United States.1 Dementia is a frequent outcome after stroke2–10 and increases the probability of long-term disability and mortality.11–14 Older adults (age older than 65 years) who are at greatest risk for stroke also have a high risk for dementia in the absence of stroke.15 It is unclear if the same factors that contribute to dementia risk in people without a previous stroke also operate to elevate risk of cognitive impairment in people with a stroke.

The incidence and determinants of vascular dementia (VaD) have been studied in a population-based cohort.6,16 However, most previous studies that directly compared subjects with and without a stroke used hospital-based cohorts.4,5,8,10,17–19 Two significant drawbacks to these studies are the potential for referral bias and the inability to reliably exclude preexisting dementia. The population-based Framingham cohort has been undergoing ongoing surveillance for incident stroke since 1950 and for incident dementia since 1975. Almost all subjects with incident stroke have undergone early and periodic neurological and neuropsychological evaluation. Furthermore, cardiovascular risk factor data, collected biennially, are available for all subjects. Hence, the Framingham cohort is well suited to prospectively investigate the frequency, pattern, and determinants of dementia after stroke and to compare this with risk factors for dementia in the absence of stroke.

See Editorial Comment, page 1268


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We used a nested case-control study design to investigate systematically participants from the Framingham Study Original cohort who were documented to be stroke- and dementia-free in January 1982 for development of dementia after their first or subsequent strokes. We compared their risk of dementia with that of age-matched and sex-matched dementia-free and stroke-free subjects selected as controls. This study design enabled direct comparison of the risk factors for dementia between subjects who had sustained a previous stroke and those who had not.

Subjects
The original cohort of the Framingham Study consisted of 5209 adults (2336 men) enrolled in 1948. Documentation of cognitive status was initiated in 1975 (examination cycle 14) using a battery of neuropsychological tests and a dementia-free inception cohort was defined.15 A total of 3082 participants were alive on January 1, 1982 and of those, 2262 were enrolled in the dementia-free cohort and were also known to be stroke-free. Both cases and controls were drawn from this population.

Between January 1, 1982 and December 31, 2001 (a 20-year study period), 321 subjects had at least 1 stroke. We identified as "cases" 217 subjects who satisfied the following entry criteria: they sustained their first stroke before age 95 years, were dementia-free at the time, survived the stroke, and were available for evaluation 6 months after the index stroke. We excluded a total of 104 subjects: 9 had been diagnosed with dementia before their stroke, 61 died in the first month after the stroke, 28 did not have a follow-up cognitive examination at 6 months, and 6 were at least 95 years old at the time of their first stroke.

Each case was randomly assigned 5 age- and sex-matched controls who were required to be alive, stroke-free, and dementia-free, with at least 6 months of follow-up subsequent to the date of stroke in their assigned case. Age matching was performed to within 1 year. Five of the 217 cases could not be matched to the requisite 5 controls and were excluded. Thus our final study sample had 212 stroke cases (66% of the original 321) and 1060 controls. Study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Boston University and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Detection and Diagnosis of Dementia
Cases and controls were followed-up until dementia developed, until they died, or until their most recent evaluation within the study period (up to 10 years after the index stroke or December 2001, whichever came first). Since 1982, the Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE)20 has been administered at each biennial examination. Individuals who scored below an education-adjusted cutoff on the MMSE or had a decrease in MMSE score of >=3 points were further evaluated by a neurologist and a neuropsychologist. The clinical diagnosis of dementia, type, and date of onset was then determined by a review panel. Framingham criteria for dementia conform to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Volume IV (DSM-IV) criteria, requiring impairment in memory and in at least 1 other area of cognitive function and documented functional disability.21 In addition, Framingham criteria require that dementia severity be >=1 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale22 and that subjects have persistent cognitive impairment for a period of at least 6 months. Dementia type was categorized as probable vascular dementia (Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers criteria),23 probable Alzheimer dementia [AD] (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders [NINCDS] and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association [ADRDA] criteria)24 or as mixed dementia (combined VaD and AD). To diagnose dementia in testable aphasic patients, impairment in nonverbal memory was required.

Definition of Independent Variables
Age was dichotomized at younger than 80 years or 80 years and older and education status at the level of high school graduation. Stroke was defined as a focal neurological deficit of acute onset, persisting for >24 hours. Details of stroke surveillance and protocol for determining the final diagnosis, type, localization, and severity of stroke have been published elsewhere.25 An ischemic brain infarction was diagnosed if computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging brain imaging showed no hemorrhage. It was classified as cardioembolic (CE) if a cardiac source of embolus was found. All other ischemic infarcts were classified as atherothrombotic brain infarcts (ABI). This category included large-artery infarcts, lacunar infarcts, and infarcts of unknown origin.

Data on cardiovascular risk factors have been collected prospectively at each biennial evaluation. We defined hypertension as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >=140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >=90 mm Hg, or being on antihypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus was defined as recorded random blood glucose level >=200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, or the use of insulin or an oral hypoglycemic agent. Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed by a cardiologist who reviewed interim and examination electrocardiograms (EKG). Baseline cigarette smoking status was established by questions at each examination. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype was determined by isoelectric focusing of the plasma and confirmed by DNA genotype.26

Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute). We compared 10-year risks of dementia developing in cases and controls using Cox proportional hazards regression models, unadjusted, and after adjustment for various demographic factors (age, sex, education), stroke-related features (right and left hemisphere, stroke type, second stroke), stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, smoking) and apoE genotype. We also calculated HRs within subgroups defined by exposure to each of these risk factors.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
During the study period (1982 to 2001), stroke occurred in 321 subjects; 212 (61% women) met entry criteria. The mean age of subjects at initial stroke was 79.2 (SD 6.6) years; mean age for matched controls was 78.6 (SD 6.6) years. Among the 212 cases, 46 had a second stroke during the follow-up period (9 of the 46 had a third stroke, and 4 had a fourth stroke). Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of cases and controls. As expected, cases were more likely to have hypertension and diabetes than control subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics of Cases and Controls

During the 10-year follow-up period, dementia developed in 19.3% of the stroke cases (41/212) compared with 11.0% of matched controls (117/1060). Overall, the presence of baseline stroke doubled the risk of dementia (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.9) after adjustment for age, sex, and educational status. Additional adjustment for apoE {epsilon}4 genotype status, stroke location, stroke type, presence of a second stroke, as well as individual stroke risk factors, did not appreciably alter the risk (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Relative Risk of Dementia in Subjects With Stroke as Compared to Controls: Crude Risks and Risks After Adjustment for Age, Sex, Education, ApoE Genotype, Stroke Recurrence, and Stroke Risk Factors

Subjects who had dementia after stroke were, as expected, most likely to have VaD, which was diagnosed in 51% (21 of 41 subjects), or a mixed VaD and AD, seen in 37% (15 of 41 subjects). Five subjects had other types of dementia. This was in contrast to controls, 79% of whom (92 of 117 subjects) had AD develop. Only 4% of controls (5 of 117 subjects) had VaD or mixed dementia diagnosed, and the remaining 17% (20 of 117) had other types of dementia. The clinical diagnosis of dementia (and type of dementia) was confirmed at autopsy in 16 clinically demented subjects.

Subgroup Analysis
Demographic factors indicated that 18.3% of men with stroke developed dementia as compared with 7.8% of their matched controls (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4 to 5.2). In women, the effect of stroke was similar (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.7). In subgroup analysis by age, baseline stroke increased the risk in subjects aged younger than 80 years (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.5); the impact was lower in subjects aged 80 years or older (HR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.7). Similarly, the impact of stroke was greater in subjects who had completed high school (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.9) than in subjects without a high school diploma (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 0.9 to 2.9) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Relative Risk of Dementia in Stroke Cases Compared to Controls Within Subgroups Defined by Various Demographic, Stroke-Related, and Genetic Risk Factors

Brain imaging was available in >90% of all subjects with stroke; 40% of strokes affected the left hemisphere, 48% the right hemisphere, and in 12% the strokes were bilateral or in the posterior fossa. The relative risk for dementia was comparable in subjects with a right hemispheric stroke (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.5) and those with a left hemispheric stroke (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0 to 3.8). Most initial strokes were ABI (67%), whereas 24% had a CE event. The remaining 8% had a vasculitic, hemorrhagic, or unknown cause for their stroke. ABI doubled the risk of dementia (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.1), CE did not significantly increase the risk (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.4 to 3.6). Among subjects with recurrent strokes, 9 out of 46 cases (19.6%) developed dementia (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.8 to 4.1).

The apoE genotype data were available in 821 subjects. The {epsilon}4 allele was present in 17.3% of the cases (22/127) and in 22.0% of the controls (153/694); in these subjects, the risk for dementia was similar in stroke cases and controls. However, in subjects who had 2 apoE {epsilon}3 alleles, the risk of dementia was increased 4-fold in cases.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In our carefully chosen study sample, free of baseline dementia, stroke cases had a 2-fold increased risk for dementia compared with controls. This result was independent of age, sex, education, hemispheric location, and type of stroke. This doubling of the risk occurred uniformly over the entire 10-year study period (Figure). Our results are similar to those reported by Kokmen et al, who also observed a doubling of the overall risk.6 However, we did not observe the 9-fold increase in relative risk, which they reported in the first year after a stroke. One reason for our lower relative risk in the first year may be our rigorous exclusion of subjects with preexisting dementia (before stroke) based on an ongoing dementia screening process, rather than a medical records linkage system. Another reason may be our definition of dementia that required survival and ascertainment of cognitive status at 6 months after the index stroke, thus excluding subjects who died early or improved cognitively within this 6-month period.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Kaplan–Meier plot showing cumulative incidence of dementia: comparison of stroke cases to controls.

Our results, based on a community-based cohort, were similar to the frequency of dementia after stroke reported in several small hospital-based cohorts with follow-up periods as short as 3 months.5,27,28 Desmond et al2 reported a slightly higher frequency of dementia after stroke (26.3% at 3 months after index stroke; HR: 3.8 compared with controls) in their hospital-based series, but they did not exclude patients with previous dementia or previous stroke. In addition, they used the more sensitive but less specific DSM-III rather than DSM-IV criteria7 and assessed cognitive status at 3 months when some patients might have still been recovering cognitive function. Finally, stroke patients who are admitted to a hospital are likely to have sustained a more severe stroke than those from a community-based cohort.

The majority of stroke subjects developed either VaD or mixed dementia (AD with VaD). The large proportion of subjects with mixed dementia after stroke (37%) suggests that a combination of vascular and degenerative pathologies may underlie the development of dementia after stroke. The distribution of vascular, mixed, and AD dementia subtypes in our cohort was similar to that reported by Desmond et al in their hospital-based series.17 Overall, the occurrence of a stroke had a substantial deleterious impact on cognition in groups of individuals thought to be at a lower baseline risk for dementia in the general population, namely males, younger individuals (younger than 80 years), those who had completed a high school education, and those without an apoE {epsilon}4 gene. Thus, having a stroke appears to nullify the lower prestroke risk of dementia these groups enjoyed. Similar to our own observations, Kokmen et al also found that although the incidence of dementia after the first ischemic stroke increased strikingly with age, the standardized morbidity ratio (an estimate of excess risk in the cohort compared with the risk in the population with the same age and sex distribution as in cohort) was highest in the younger age groups and decreased with increasing age.6

Previous studies3,17 comparing subjects who did and did not develop dementia after a stroke found diabetes mellitus to be an independent predictor for the development of poststroke dementia. In our analysis, none of the individual stroke risk factors that we studied (diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, smoking) significantly altered the impact of stroke on the risk of dementia. Thus, these stroke risk factors may increase the risk of dementia primarily by increasing the risk of clinical stroke. Another possible explanation is that we missed a true effect because of relatively small subject numbers within each subgroup analyzed. This may also explain why we found similar relative risks of dementia in subjects who had sustained a single stroke and in those who had sustained >1 stroke, when each group was matched to their respective controls.

We did not address the entire spectrum of vascular cognitive impairment but restricted this analysis to clinical dementia after clinical stroke. Further, we have not analyzed certain brain imaging variables such as white matter hyperintensity and silent cerebral infarcts because these were not available at comparable time points in all controls. Our study population was overwhelmingly white. The validity of these results in other racial groups can only be demonstrated by similar analyses using other cohorts. We used a stringent definition of dementia and may have underestimated the overall incidence of dementia after stroke, but clearly a stroke at least doubles the risk of dementia.

Our data, assessing the long-term impact of a stroke over a decade of follow-up of a community-based cohort, reiterate the importance of stroke prevention measures, not only to reduce mortality, morbidity, and disability directly attributable to the stroke but also to decrease the risk and population burden of dementia.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NHLBI Contract N01-HC-25195), and by grants from the National Institute on Aging (5R01-AG08122 and 5R01-AG16495), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5R01-NS17950), and the Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Center (P30 AG13846).

Received December 4, 2003; revision received March 2, 2004; accepted March 29, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, Pancioli A, Gebel J, Mills D, Minneci L, Shukla R. The greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998; 29: 415–421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Incidence of dementia after ischemic stroke: results of a longitudinal study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2254–2260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Henon H, Durieu I, Guerouaou D, Lebert F, Pasquier F, Leys D. Poststroke dementia: incidence and relationship to prestroke cognitive decline. Neurology. 2001; 57: 1216–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Inzitari D, Di Carlo A, Pracucci G, Lamassa M, Vanni P, Romanelli M, Spolveri S, Adriani P, Meucci I, Landini G, Ghetti A. Incidence and determinants of poststroke dementia as defined by an informant interview method in a hospital-based stroke registry. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2087–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Censori B, Manara O, Agostinis C, Camerlingo M, Casto L, Galavotti B, Partziguian T, Servalli MC, Cesana B, Belloni G, Mamoli A. Dementia after first stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1205–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kokmen E, Whisnant JP, O’Fallon WM, Chu CP, Beard CM. Dementia after ischemic stroke: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota (1960–1984). Neurology. 1996; 46: 154–159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M. Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke. 1997; 28: 785–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tatemichi TK, Foulkes MA, Mohr JP, Hewitt JR, Hier DB, Price TR, Wolf PA. Dementia in stroke survivors in the Stroke Data Bank cohort. Prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and computed tomographic findings. Stroke. 1990; 21: 858–866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tatemichi TK, Paik M, Bagiella E, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Sano M, Hauser WA, Mayeux R. Risk of dementia after stroke in a hospitalized cohort: results of a longitudinal study. Neurology. 1994; 44: 1885–1891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Loeb C, Gandolfo C, Croce R, Conti M. Dementia associated with lacunar infarction. Stroke. 1992; 23: 1225–1229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Bagiella E, Sano M, Stern Y. Dementia as a predictor of adverse outcomes following stroke: an evaluation of diagnostic methods. Stroke. 1998; 29: 69–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste M. Correlates of dependent living 3 months after ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998; 8: 259–266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Prencipe M, Ferretti C, Casini AR, Santini M, Giubilei F, Culasso F. Stroke, disability, and dementia: results of a population survey. Stroke. 1997; 28: 531–536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Zhu L, Fratiglioni L, Guo Z, Aguero-Torres H, Winblad B, Viitanen M. Association of stroke with dementia, cognitive impairment, and functional disability in the very old: a population-based study. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2094–2099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bachman DL, Wolf PA, Linn RT, Knoefel JE, Cobb JL, Belanger AJ, White LR, D’Agostino RB. Incidence of dementia and probable Alzheimer’s disease in a general population: the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1993; 43: 515–519.
  16. Knopman DS, Rocca WA, Cha RH, Edland SD, Kokmen E. Incidence of vascular dementia in Rochester, Minn, 1985–1989. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59: 1605–1610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Paik MC, Sano M, Mohr JP, Aboumatar S, Tseng CL, Chan S, Williams JB, Remien RH, Hauser WA, Stern Y. Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1124–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Ylikoski R, Hietanen M, Vataja R, Kaste M. Clinical determinants of poststroke dementia. Stroke. 1998; 29: 75–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Henon H, Pasquier F, Durieu I, Godefroy O, Lucas C, Lebert F, Leys D. Preexisting dementia in stroke patients. Baseline frequency, associated factors, and outcome. Stroke. 1997; 28: 2429–2436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189–198.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Am Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: Am Psychiatric Association; 1994.
  22. Berg L. Clinical dementia rating (CDR). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24: 637–639.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Chui HC, Victoroff JI, Margolin D, Jagust W, Shankle R, Katzman R. Criteria for the diagnosis of ischemic vascular dementia proposed by the State of California Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers. Neurology. 1992; 42: 473–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984; 34: 939–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, O’Neal MA, Sytkowski P, Kase CS, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Secular trends in stroke incidence and mortality. The Framingham study. Stroke. 1992; 23: 1551–1555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Welty FK, Lahoz C, Tucker KL, Ordovas JM, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ. Frequency of ApoB and ApoE gene mutations as causes of hypobetalipoproteinemia in the Framingham Offspring population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1745–1751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Barba R, Martinez-Espinosa S, Rodriguez-Garcia E, Pondal M, Vivancos J, Del Ser T. Poststroke dementia: clinical features and risk factors. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1494–1501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lin JH, Lin RT, Tai CT, Hsieh CL, Hsiao SF, Liu CK. Prediction of poststroke dementia. Neurology. 2003; 61: 343–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article:

Editorial Comment—Dementia After Stroke
John V. Bowler
Stroke 2004 35: 1268-1269. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. Viswanathan, A. Gschwendtner, J. -P. Guichard, F. Buffon, R. Cumurciuc, M. O'Sullivan, M. Holtmannspotter, C. Pachai, M. -G. Bousser, M. Dichgans, et al.
Lacunar lesions are independently associated with disability and cognitive impairment in CADASIL
Neurology, July 10, 2007; 69(2): 172 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
L. Baum, Xiangyan Chen, Wing Sze Cheung, C. K. A. Cheung, Lap Woon Cheung, K. F. P. Chiu, Hong Mei Wen, P. Poon, Kam Sang Woo, Ho Keung Ng, et al.
Polymorphisms and Vascular Cognitive Impairment After Ischemic Stroke
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, June 1, 2007; 20(2): 93 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. F. Elias, L. M. Sullivan, P. K. Elias, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, P. A. Wolf, S. Seshadri, R. Au, E. J. Benjamin, and R. S. Vasan
Left Ventricular Mass, Blood Pressure, and Lowered Cognitive Performance in the Framingham Offspring
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 439 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. A. Staessen, T. Richart, and W. H. Birkenhager
Less Atherosclerosis and Lower Blood Pressure for a Meaningful Life Perspective With More Brain
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 389 - 400.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
A. Akomolafe, A. Beiser, J. B. Meigs, R. Au, R. C. Green, L. A. Farrer, P. A. Wolf, and S. Seshadri
Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Developing Alzheimer Disease: Results From the Framingham Study
Arch Neurol, November 1, 2006; 63(11): 1551 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. S. DeCarli
When two are worse than one: Stroke and Alzheimer disease
Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1326 - 1327.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. Gamaldo, A. Moghekar, S. Kilada, S. M. Resnick, A. B. Zonderman, and R. O'Brien
Effect of a clinical stroke on the risk of dementia in a prospective cohort
Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1363 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. M. Murray, D. E. Tupper, D. S. Knopman, D. T. Gilbertson, S. L. Pederson, S. Li, G. E. Smith, A. K. Hochhalter, A. J. Collins, and R. L. Kane
Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is common.
Neurology, July 25, 2006; 67(2): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. A. Bennett
Secular Trends in Stroke Incidence and Survival, and the Occurrence of Dementia
Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1144 - 1145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
C. Reitz, J. A. Luchsinger, M.-X. Tang, J. Manly, and R. Mayeux
Stroke and memory performance in elderly persons without dementia.
Arch Neurol, April 1, 2006; 63(4): 571 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study, A. G. Yip, C. Brayne, and F. E. Matthews
Risk factors for incident dementia in England and Wales: The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. A population-based nested case-control study
Age Ageing, March 1, 2006; 35(2): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. G. Leblanc, J. F. Meschia, D. T. Stuss, and V. Hachinski
Genetics of Vascular Cognitive Impairment: The Opportunity and the Challenges
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. F. Elias, L. M. Sullivan, R. B. D'Agostino, P. K. Elias, P. F. Jacques, J. Selhub, S. Seshadri, R. Au, A. Beiser, and P. A. Wolf
Homocysteine and Cognitive Performance in the Framingham Offspring Study: Age Is Important
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 644 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
J. Bridges
Having a stroke increased the risk of developing dementia in older people
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2005; 8(1): 25 - 25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. Chakraborty, S. Seshadri, A. Beiser, C. S. Ivan, R. Au, C. S. Kase, M. Kelly-Hayes, and P. A. Wolf
Does Preventing Stroke Prevent All Kinds of Dementia?
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2436 - 2437.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch PsychiatryHome page
Stroke Increases Dementia Risk
Journal Watch Psychiatry, September 23, 2004; 2004(923): 9 - 9.
[Full Text]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2004; 9(5): e5 - e5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Stroke Increases Dementia Risk
Journal Watch Neurology, July 22, 2004; 2004(722): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, June 12, 2004; 328(7453): 1446 - 1446.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. V. Bowler
Editorial Comment--Dementia After Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1268 - 1269.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/1264    most recent
01.STR.0000127810.92616.78v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivan, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dementia
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrowRelated Article