| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:1631.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the University Department of Radiology (R.A.T., J.-M.U., E.W., I.J., J.H.G.), Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; the Department of Pathology (J.H., M.J.G.), Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK; GlaxoSmithKline (G.Q., L.W., J.B.), Translational Medicine and Technology, Addenbrookes Centre for Clinical Investigation, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; the Multi-Imaging Centre (J.N.S.), University Department of Anatomy, Cambridge, UK; and the Academic Department of Neurosurgery (P.J.K.), Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Jonathan H. Gillard, University Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Box 219, Hills Road, Cambridge CB22QQ, UK. E-mail jhg21{at}cam.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Eight patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent multisequence MRI of the carotid bifurcation before and 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after Sinerem (2.6 mg/kg) infusion.
Results USPIO particles accumulated in macrophages in 7 of 8 patients given Sinerem. Areas of signal intensity reduction, corresponding to USPIO/macrophage-positive histological sections, were visualized in all 7 of these patients, optimally between 24 and 36 hours, decreasing after 48 hours, but still evident up to 96 hours after infusion.
Conclusions USPIO-enhanced MRI of carotid atheroma can be used to identify macrophages in vivo. The temporal change in the resultant signal intensity reduction on MRI suggests an optimal time window for the detection of macrophages on postinfusion imaging.
Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging carotid arteries atherosclerosis macrophages
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies in hyperlipidemic rabbits revealed that superparamagnetic iron oxide particles are taken up by macrophage-laden aortic plaques as intracellular inclusions4 and reveal areas of focal signal loss on T2*-weighted MRI within the vessel wall when compared with precontrast images.5 More recently, the ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent Sinerem has been used in the evaluation of human carotid atheroma,6,7 in which areas of focal signal loss on in vivo MR images corresponded to accumulation of iron particles in ex vivo specimens. The authors described optimal results with postcontrast imaging at 24 hours with a T2*-weighted 2D gradient echo (GE) sequence, although data on the time course and duration of the in vivo MRI signal intensity (SI) effect were not fully reported. These factors are likely to be important in understanding and interpreting in vivo macrophage labeling using USPIO enhanced MRI, particularly because intracellular clustering of these particles can have a profound result on signal effect. In this study, we determined the in vivo temporal relationship of SI reduction on MRI after Sinerem-enhanced in vivo MRI of human carotid atheroma in symptomatic patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Contrast Agent
Sinerem (Guerbet) was supplied as a dry powder in 20-mL vials. The injection concentration of 2.6 mg/kg was obtained after suspension in 10 mL sodium chloride. The physiochemical properties and the safety data of the agent have been described previously.8 The contrast agent was infused during a period of 30 minutes through an indwelling large-bore intravenous cannula.
MRI
All the imaging studies were conducted on a 1.5-T whole body system (CV/I; GE Medical Systems) using a customized 4-channel phased array coil (Flick Engineering Solutions BV) wrapped around the neck. Imaging was performed before and 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after the administration of Sinerem. The following ECG-gated, fat-suppressed pulse sequences using double-inversion blood suppression were used on each occasion: 2D T1-weighted fast spin-echo (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE]eff 1 R-R/7.8 ms; voxel size 0.4x0.4x3 mm; echo train length=12 matrix: 256x256 and 2 signal averages) and 2 2D T2*-weighted spiral acquisitions using spectral-spatial excitation pulses, 1 with a TE of 5.6 ms and 1 with a TE of 15 ms; both sequences used a TR of 1 R-R. The inversion time of the postinfusion T1-weighted sequence was adjusted to counter the USPIO shortening effect in blood. The multishot spiral sequence involved the acquisition of 22 spiral interleaves, each of 4096 data points, resulting in an effective in-plane pixel size of 0.42x0.42 mm; 2 signal averages were performed.
Image Analysis
Histology and MR Coregistration
Axial MR images were acquired with reference to the carotid bifurcation from a planning time-of-flight sequence. The same anatomical markers were used for each postinfusion study, and accurate coregistration between MR images was further facilitated by use of soft cervical collar around the neck to minimize movement. Histological sections cut from blocks with reference to the carotid bifurcation of the ex vivo specimen were matched to the axial MRI slices by visually coregistering for orientation. There was little difficulty in matching the axial slices to histology section with this method.
Qualitative
All MR images were analyzed by 2 independent attending neuroradiologists. The readers were blind to the histological data as well as the time points and sequences of the postinfusion images, which were compared with those from the preinfusion study. The sequence order of images on the preinfusion images was maintained on each set of postinfusion images, but the latter were viewed in a random order. The readers were asked to identify on which set of postinfusion images the signal effect was best visualized, if at all. Images were deemed acceptable for analysis only if both readers agreed that the entire border of the carotid vessel wall was clearly visible and the lumen free of flow artifacts. The presence of the major plaque components (lipid core, fibrous cap, calcium) were characterized by both readers on preinfusion images on the basis of previously validated work.9 Previous preclinical and early human studies demonstrated that USPIO particles in atheroma caused signal loss in the subendothelial region of the vessel wall.6,7 To avoid misclassifying plaque calcification, which can give similar appearances to USPIO on T1, proton density, and T2-weighted sequences, we attributed only new areas of signal loss to USPIO accumulation.
Quantitative
Changes in relative SI (rSI) between preinfusion and postinfusion images within the entire noncalcified portion of the atheromatous plaque were determined by an independent reader unaware of the qualitative or histological analysis using Analyze (BIR). The rSI was defined as the quotient of the SI in the user-defined plaque area divided by that of the adjacent sternoclaeidomastoid for each MR image. To ensure that SI measurements from postcontrast images were being taken from comparable areas, the area of the entire noncalcified plaque was used for SI analysis rather than vessel quadrants because after review of the report using the latter approach, it was felt that this approach was more susceptible to error, particularly if image quality was variable.7
Histological Analysis
Intact atheromatous plaques were obtained after surgery and fixed in 10% formalin solution. Plaques underwent decalcification in EDTA solution to facilitate specimen sectioning. Subsequently, 3-mm-thick transverse sections were cut and embedded in paraffin blocks. From these blocks, 4-µm sections were obtained from the caudal end. Sections were dehydrated and underwent hematoxylin and eosin, Perls reagent, elastin van Gieson stains, and immunostaining for macrophages (MAC 387). Histological sections were reviewed independently by an experienced reader. USPIO accumulation was confirmed by Perls-positive staining, and histological sections were rated as positive or negative accordingly. Perls/MAC 387 double staining was used to confirm the colocalization of USPIO with macrophages.
Electron Microscopy
Electron microscopy was performed on 1-mm slices adjacent to Perls-positive sections in 2 patients. These were rinsed, dehydrated, and embedded in Spurr epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were taken from Perls-rich regions and mounted on nickel grids. They were viewed unstained with a CM100 transmission electron microscope (Phillips) operated at either 60 or 80 kV using a 10-µm lens. Structures with similar electron scattering properties to a Sinerem/gelatin standard were considered to be accumulated Sinerem particles.
Data Analysis
Cohens
-statistic with 95% CI was computed to quantify the agreement between the readers to identify new areas of signal loss, and the time point and sequence image on which this was best visualized was measured. In the event of disagreement, a decision was reached by consensus. A value of
>0.70 was used to indicate a high level of agreement. Statistical comparisons of rSI between the postinfusion images were performed, using a paired t test with a probability value of <0.05 indicating statistical significance. Agreement on the size of area defined for rSI analysis in preinfusion and postinfusion images was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. The data were analyzed using SAS 6.12 software (SAS Institute) and SPSS for Windows (version 10.1; SPSS).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Qualitative MRI Analysis
A complete set of images was obtained for 7 of 8 patients who underwent USPIO-enhanced MRI. In 1 patient, expedited surgery terminated the imaging protocol after 36 hours. There were 6 matched MR images and histological sections for each time point up to and including 36 hours in this study. In 1 patient, the 72-hour imaging time point was delayed until 96 hours after infusion because of his lack of availability. After excluding images of poor quality and those without plaque, there were 132 (44 axial slices x 3 sequences) matched postinfusion images per time point available for analysis.
Overall, Cohens
-value between the classification obtained by reader 1 and that of reader 2 was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.00), corresponding to good agreement. In 7 of 8 patients, there was a positive finding on the MR images (area of new signal loss in the subendothelial region) observed by both MRI readers. This finding was seen in only those images corresponding to Perls-positive stained sections (35/44). There was no signal loss seen in any of the MR images matched to tissue sections with no Perls-positive staining (9/44). This positive finding was visualized most easily on the "short TE" T2*-weighted spiral sequence but also evident on the "long TE" T2*-weighted spiral and 2D T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequences at all time points after infusion. In 3 of the 7 patients, this signal loss was seen as a focal area, whereas in the remainder, the signal loss was diffuse within the plaque. The size of the visualized area of signal loss varied between the patients for any given time point, but there was a distinct temporal variation in the size of this area between images from any 1 patient. The earliest discernible signal loss was evident by 24 hours, becoming visually more obvious at 36 hours after infusion and remaining so at 48 hours after infusion. The area of signal loss began to decrease after 48 hours but was still visible on images taken 96 hours after infusion. This area of signal loss localized to the fibrous cap region (Figure 3).
|
Quantitative MRI Analysis
Quantitative SI analyses of MR images confirmed a reduction in rSI in only those images rated positive by qualitative and histological analysis (n=35). There was a reduction in mean rSI at 24, 36, and 48 hours on images from all 3 MR sequences, being greatest on the long TE blood-suppressed T2*-weighted spiral sequence at 24 (7%, range 1.2% to 36%) and 36 (9%, range 0.2% to 40%) hours. The magnitude of reduction in rSI decreased after 48 hours and was minimal or reversed at 72 hours (Figure 4). There was no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of rSI reduction between 24 and 36 hours (P=0.2499), but there was between 36 and 48 hours (P=0.035). The intraclass correlation coefficient, for precontrast and postcontrast user-defined areas, was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.83), indicating that the regions used for rSI analysis were comparable. For the patient in whom there was no qualitative signal loss visualized on axial MRI, rSI analysis revealed no change from preinfusion images, and histology revealed no Perls-positive staining in any of the matched sections.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this blinded analysis, we found a new area of signal loss in 7 of 8 patients who had Sinerem-enhanced MRI. This positive finding was most easily visualized using a blood-suppressed 2D T2*-weighted spiral sequence (TE 5.6 ms) between 24 and 48 hours after infusion. Quantitative analysis further supported that imaging up to 48 hours after infusion can identify macrophages in vivo, although imaging between 24 and 36 hours may be better. This finding adds to the report by Kooi et al7 that suggested the optimal postinfusion time to be 24 hours based only on the magnitude of rSI reduction. Although those authors reported a larger reduction in rSI than we observed, this effect can be attributed partially to the fact that they used a GE sequence with a longer ET of 20 ms. This reflects in vitro data demonstrating a "blooming" effect of the USPIO agent on T2*-weighted imaging, with increasing ETs12 rather than peak accumulation. Although defining the entire noncalcified plaque as the region of interest to measure SI changes would ensure measurement accuracy, this might underestimate the magnitude of signal change. We chose to implement a blood-suppressed spiral imaging sequence that we found to provide better image quality than ECG-gated T2*-weighted conventional GE because of the improved time efficiency of spiral acquisitions. This allowed us to reliably determine the lumen/plaque boundary. Increasing the TE to 15 ms increased the magnitude of the rSI reduction at the expense of a decrease in image signal to noise. Furthermore, because the signal reduction properties of USPIO are attributable in some part to intracellular clustering of particles rather than absolute number alone, it is difficult to determine the relationship between magnitude of SI reduction and macrophage burden within the plaque, and consequently, this necessitates caution when sequence and timing optimization are based solely on SI reduction.13 From this we would consider a T2*-weighted sequence with a minimum ET of 5.6 ms to be sufficient to detect the T2*-weighted effect of USPIOs.
In addition, it is difficult to be sure of the accuracy of precontrast and postcontrast coregistration of the areas used by Kooi et al7 in their rSI analyses because lumen/plaque boundaries were not reliably discernible in all the images they presented, a fact that might account for the larger reduction in rSI that they measured. We have shown that the regions used in our preinfusion and postinfusion rSI analyses were comparable, and consequently, although the magnitude of SI reduction is less than that has been reported, we consider this to be highly accurate.
We observed a relative increase in rSI after 48 hours compared with earlier postinfusion time points, and almost no change in rSI at 72 hours, which mirrored the depreciation in USPIO effect seen on qualitative analysis. We think this most likely represents a "washout" of iron particles from the plaque by diffusion or by physiological recirculation of the endocytosed iron,14 which would be supported by the relative increase in rSI measured after 48 hours. Despite an average time interval between USPIO infusion and surgery of less than 7 days, there was a wide range (up to 18 days) because of pressures on the operating department, which made the relationship between MRI signal effect and USPIO accumulation difficult to interpret.
The way in which USPIOs enter the atheromatous plaque remains unknown. Analysis of our histological data seems to suggest either recruitment of USPIO particles directly into plaque or recruitment of macrophages loaded peripherally with USPIO via the vaso vasora or neovascularization because iron particles were found in the adventitial wall as well as within the plaque substance itself. Alternatively, entry may be through widened endothelial junctions within the surface of the fibrous cap overlying the plaque, thereafter becoming phagocytosed by intraplaque macrophages. From our study, the latter seems less likely because we did not observe USPIO colocalization with endothelial cells (data not shown), although others have.5,7 The lack of USPIO uptake in 1 patient, operated on 48 hours after USPIO infusion, who had the longest lag time from symptoms to surgery (7 months), may be explained by a lack of intraplaque neovascularization or minimal to no endothelial dysfunction, factors that are likely to be important in determining plaque accessibility to either USPIO directly or peripherally loaded macrophages. Because it was not possible to validate the MRI appearance of the contralateral vessel, these vessels were not included in the analysis.
We have demonstrated the safe use of Sinerem and shown that it has the potential to be used as an in vivo MRI contrast agent to identify inflamed atheromatous plaques. Furthermore, we have shown by the temporal variability of MRI signal loss that the process of in vivo macrophage visualization is dynamic and not sustained. USPIO-enhanced MRI between 24 and 48 hours using an ECG-gated, blood-suppressed T2*-weighted spiral imaging sequence with a minimum ET appears to be sufficient to detect this effect and preserve image quality. In the future, larger prospective studies of USPIO-enhanced MRI could be undertaken to identify vulnerable plaques at high risk of rupture as well as to evaluate the effect of novel therapies on functional activity within atheromatous plaques.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 28, 2003; revision received January 26, 2004; accepted March 22, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 13711375.[Abstract]
3. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995; 92: 13551374.
4. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001; 103: 415422.
5. Schmitz SA, Coupland SE, Gust R, Winterhalter S, Wagner S, Kresse M, Semmler W, Wolf KJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques in Watanabe hereditable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Invest Radiol. 2000; 35: 460471.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Schmitz SA, Taupitz M, Wagner S, Wolf KJ, Beyersdorff D, Hamm B. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14: 355361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Borgers M, Frederik PM, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003; 107: 24532458.
8. McLachlan SJ, Morris MR, Lucas MA, Fisco RA, Eakins MN, Fowler DR, Scheetz RB, Olukotun AY. Phase I clinical evaluation of a new iron oxide MR contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994; 4: 301307.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Trivedi RA, U-King-Im J, Graves MJ, Horsley J, Goddard M, Kirkpatrick PJ. Quantitative in vivo MRI characterization of human carotid atheroma. In: Int Soc Mag Res Med. Toronto, Canada: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine;2003:160.
10. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Small R, Davies JW, Kerwin WS, Hatsukami TS. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001; 104: 20512056.
11. Ross R. Atherosclerosisan inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115126.
12. Billotey C, Wilhelm C, Devaud M, Bacri JC, Bittoun J, Gazeau F. Cell internalization of anionic maghemite nanoparticles: quantitative effect on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49: 646654.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Foster-Gareau P, Heyn C, Alejski A, Rutt BK. Imaging single mammalian cells with a 1.5 T clinical MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49: 968971.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Mulero V, Wei XQ, Liew FY, Brock JH. Regulation of phagosomal iron release from murine macrophages by nitric oxide. Biochem J. 2002; 365: 127132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Saravanan, A. R. Exley, K. Valchanov, N. D. Casey, and F. Falter Impact of xenon anaesthesia in isolated cardiopulmonary bypass on very early leucocyte and platelet activation and clearance: a randomized, controlled study Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 805 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Truijers, J. J. Futterer, S. Takahashi, R. A. Heesakkers, J. D. Blankensteijn, and J. O. Barentsz In Vivo Imaging of the Aneurysm Wall With MRI and a Macrophage-Specific Contrast Agent Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): W437 - W441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Oppenheim, O. Naggara, E. Touze, J.-C. Lacour, E. Schmitt, F. Bonneville, S. Crozier, E. Guegan-Massardier, E. Gerardin, X. Leclerc, et al. High-Resolution MR Imaging of the Cervical Arterial Wall: What the Radiologist Needs to Know RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1413 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Saraste, S. G. Nekolla, and M. Schwaiger Cardiovascular molecular imaging: an overview Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2009; 83(4): 643 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sigovan, L. Boussel, A. Sulaiman, D. Sappey-Marinier, H. Alsaid, C. Desbleds-Mansard, D. Ibarrola, D. Gamondes, C. Corot, E. Lancelot, et al. Rapid-Clearance Iron Nanoparticles for Inflammation Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque: Initial Experience in Animal Model Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 401 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chu, M. S. Ferguson, H. Chen, D. S. Hippe, W. S. Kerwin, G. Canton, C. Yuan, and T. S. Hatsukami Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Features of the Disruption-Prone and the Disrupted Carotid Plaque J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 883 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Choudhury and E. A. Fisher Molecular Imaging in Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Inflammation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. Tang, K. H. Muller, M. J. Graves, Z. Y. Li, S. R. Walsh, V. Young, U. Sadat, S. P.S. Howarth, and J.H. Gillard Iron Oxide Particles for Atheroma Imaging Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H.F. Rudd, F. Hyafil, and Z. A. Fayad Inflammation Imaging in Atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Jaffer, P. Libby, and R. Weissleder Optical and Multimodality Molecular Imaging: Insights Into Atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 1017 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. Tang, S. P.S. Howarth, S. R. Miller, M. J. Graves, A. J. Patterson, J.-M. U-King-Im, Z. Y. Li, S. R. Walsh, A. P. Brown, P. J. Kirkpatrick, et al. The ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophage Activity) Study: Evaluation Using Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Carotid Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2039 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hyafil, J.-C. Cornily, J. H.F. Rudd, J. Machac, L. J. Feldman, and Z. A. Fayad Quantification of Inflammation Within Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques Using the Macrophage-Specific CT Contrast Agent N1177: A Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Histology J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y Tang, S. P S Howarth, S. R Miller, M. J Graves, J.-M. U-King-Im, R. A Trivedi, Z. Y. Li, S. R Walsh, A. P Brown, P. J Kirkpatrick, et al. Comparison of the inflammatory burden of truly asymptomatic carotid atheroma with atherosclerotic plaques contralateral to symptomatic carotid stenosis: an ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide enhanced magnetic resonance study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 78(12): 1337 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Jaffer, P. Libby, and R. Weissleder Molecular Imaging of Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, August 28, 2007; 116(9): 1052 - 1061. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Sosnovik, M. Nahrendorf, and R. Weissleder Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cardiovascular Medicine Circulation, April 17, 2007; 115(15): 2076 - 2086. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tang, S. P.S. Howarth, S. R. Miller, R. Trivedi, M. J. Graves, J. U. King-Im, Z. Y. Li, A. P. Brown, P. J. Kirkpatrick, M. E. Gaunt, et al. Assessment of Inflammatory Burden Contralateral to the Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Using High-Resolution Ultrasmall, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced MRI Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2266 - 2270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Crouse III Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1677 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cengelli, D. Maysinger, F. Tschudi-Monnet, X. Montet, C. Corot, A. Petri-Fink, H. Hofmann, and L. Juillerat-Jeanneret Interaction of Functionalized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Brain Structures J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 108 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Trivedi, C. Mallawarachi, J.-M. U-King-Im, M. J. Graves, J. Horsley, M. J. Goddard, A. Brown, L. Wang, P. J. Kirkpatrick, J. Brown, et al. Identifying Inflamed Carotid Plaques Using In Vivo USPIO-Enhanced MR Imaging to Label Plaque Macrophages Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1601 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Stoll and M. Bendszus Inflammation and Atherosclerosis: Novel Insights Into Plaque Formation and Destabilization Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1923 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Jaffer, P. Libby, and R. Weissleder Molecular and Cellular Imaging of Atherosclerosis: Emerging Applications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1328 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Wickline, A. M. Neubauer, P. Winter, S. Caruthers, and G. Lanza Applications of Nanotechnology to Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2006; 26(3): 435 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hyafil, J.-P. Laissy, M. Mazighi, D. Tchetche, L. Louedec, H. Adle-Biassette, S. Chillon, D. Henin, M.-P. Jacob, D. Letourneur, et al. Ferumoxtran-10-Enhanced MRI of the Hypercholesterolemic Rabbit Aorta: Relationship Between Signal Loss and Macrophage Infiltration Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nighoghossian, L. Derex, and P. Douek The Vulnerable Carotid Artery Plaque: Current Imaging Methods and New Perspectives Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2764 - 2772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.K. Lovett, J.N.E. Redgrave, and P.M. Rothwell A Critical Appraisal of the Performance, Reporting, and Interpretation of Studies Comparing Carotid Plaque Imaging With Histology Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 1085 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Jaffer and R. Weissleder Molecular Imaging in the Clinical Arena JAMA, February 16, 2005; 293(7): 855 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Baron and S. Warach Imaging Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 196 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |