Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:1636-1641
Published online before print May 13, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000129790.00318.a3
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/7/1636    most recent
01.STR.0000129790.00318.a3v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karan, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis

(Stroke. 2004;35:1636.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Osteoprotegerin and Osteopontin Are Expressed at High Concentrations Within Symptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis

Jonathan Golledge, MChir; Moira McCann, PhD; Simone Mangan, BSc; Alfred Lam, FRCP Mirko Karan, PhD

From the Vascular Biology Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Correspondence to Assoc Prof Jonathan Golledge, Director, The Vascular Biology Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia. E-mail Jonathan.Golledge{at}jcu.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— The aim of this study was to compare the concentration of osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL), and osteopontin (OPN) in stable (asymptomatic) and unstable (symptomatic) carotid atherosclerosis. In addition, we were interested in the effect of angiotensin II blockade on the secretion of these proteins by unstable atherosclerosis.

Methods— Endarterectomy samples removed from patients with recent (within 6 weeks) or no previous focal neurological symptoms were assessed by immunohistochemistry, Western analysis, and explant culture. Concentrations of OPG, RANKL, and OPN were measured by mean optical density (MOD), densitometry of protein bands, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of supernatants from explant culture, and compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Results— The concentration of OPG and OPN within the proximal internal carotid (PIC) part of the endarterectomy specimen removed from symptomatic patients was elevated 2- and 4-fold, respectively. Although the concentration of RANKL did not differ according to patients’ symptoms, the quantity of OPG secreted by explants of the PIC was greater in explants from symptomatic patients and could be significantly reduced within 48 hours of incubation with the angiotensin II blocker irbesartan.

Conclusion— OPG and OPN are upregulated in symptomatic human carotid atherosclerosis with possible implications for plaque stability. Angiotensin II blockade is able to downregulate OPG secretion in vitro.


Key Words: carotid arteries • atherosclerosis • carotid artery plaque


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The development of atherosclerosis is a complex process involving the collection of lipids and smooth muscle and inflammatory cells within the intima of arteries of predilection.1 The severity of atherosclerosis at a given site can be graded histologically, with more advanced lesions commonly demonstrating intimal calcification.2 The significance of this intimal calcification is controversial.3–11 Some but not all studies have suggested calcification to predict a more stable plaque less likely to be associated with symptoms. For example, Hunt et al examined carotid endarterectomy specimens from 142 patients and reported a relationship between the absence of calcification and symptoms.9 Calcification was present in 48% of plaques removed from asymptomatic patients compared with 34% in specimens from symptomatic patients (P=0.04).9 Support for a relationship between instability and low levels of plaque calcification comes from studies in the coronary circulation.10,11 For example, Shemesh et al demonstrated much lower total coronary calcium scores (TCS) in patients with an acute myocardial event (median TCS 63) compared with patients with chronic angina (median TCS 906; P<0.01).10

Various mechanisms have been suggested by which calcification might alter atherosclerotic plaque stability. Calcification would be expected to alter the stress distribution within the atherosclerotic plaque, and some12,13 but not all14 studies have suggested calcium to increase the mechanical stability of the plaque. The process of vascular calcification itself might be an important factor linking plaque stability and calcium. In vitro and animal studies simulating arterial calcification suggest that vascular calcification involves a group of noncollagenous matrix proteins originally identified as important in bone mineralization, including osteopontin (OPN), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL).15–17 These proteins have been demonstrated to have pleiotropic effects that influence matrix turnover, cell migration, and inflammation—all processes believed to be fundamental in atherosclerotic plaque stability.

OPN, a glycoprotein secreted by macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and endothelial cells has been demonstrated to promote macrophage and endothelial chemotaxis.15 In vitro studies of VSMC calcification suggests that OPN acts to promote decalcification.16 The OPG/RANKL/receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B (RANK) group of proteins have also been implicated in decalcification.17 Within bone, OPG binds with RANKL, thereby preventing it from interacting with RANK expressed on osteoclasts.17 Like OPN, OPG and RANKL have been demonstrated to have pleiotropic effects, such as modulating secretion of proteolytic enzymes by osteoclasts and interactions between inflammatory cells.17–19 Differential expression of noncollagenous matrix proteins within atherosclerotic plaque could not only alter the incidence of calcification but also alter the remodeling of the plaque and thus alter rupture risk. Animal and cell culture studies suggest that the expression of OPG and OPN is upregulated in the presence of angiotensin II.20,21 The aim of this study was to assess the relative expression of OPG, RANKL, and OPN in clinically stable and unstable atherosclerosis and to measure the effect of angiotensin II blockers on the secretion of these proteins.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Specimens
Approval for this study was provided by the ethics committees’ of the Townsville and Mater Hospitals and James Cook University. Informed consent was obtained from participating patients. As part of their preoperative assessment, patients were assessed by consultation with an experienced physician, duplex imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and head computerized tomography. Patients included in the study either presented with focal neurological symptoms related to their anterior cerebral circulation (transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, and stroke) within 6 weeks of surgery (defined as symptomatic) or presented with no history of neurological symptoms (defined as asymptomatic).22 Patients with nonfocal, atypical, or distant neurological symptoms were excluded. Patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II blockers were excluded. All patients included in the study had a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or greater defined on duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography.23 A conventional endarterectomy was performed, developing a deep medial plane and removing the specimen en bloc.22 The common carotid site was tagged for orientation. Specimens were immediately placed in cold culture medium (serum-free Dulbecco modified eagle medium supplemented with antibiotics) and brought to the laboratory for experimental work. Using sterile techniques, specimens were cut from the proximal internal carotid and common carotid endarterectomy sites for assessment by immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, or explant culture. Each specimen was used for immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, or explant culture alone to ensure that the diseased site within the specimen was obtained for the assessment in question.

Serum and Plasma Measurements
White blood cell count, serum creatinine, fasting cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, homocysteine, and C-reactive protein were measured as previously described.24–26 Serum OPG and OPN were measured by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (R&D Systems) in which the intraassay coefficient of variation was <5%.

Immunohistochemistry
Circumferential specimens removed from the diseased internal carotid and common carotid parts of the endarterectomy specimen were formalin-fixed, mounted on end, and wax-embedded. Sections (5 µmol/L) were rehydrated and stained by the immunoperoxidase technique using antibodies to OPN (LF-166, kindly supplied by Dr Larry Fisher, 1 in 1000), OPG (Imgenex, 1 in 1000), RANKL (Imgenex, 1 in 1000), CD68 (Dako, 1 in 100), smooth muscle cell actin (Dako, 1 in 100), and CD3 (Dako, 1 in 100).27 Samples used to assess staining intensity were processed at the same time to minimize differences in staining conditions. Staining was quantified using optical density.28 Briefly, computerized images of each section were captured using a digital camera mounted on a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope and Fujifilm software. Three areas of maximal staining were identified and the mean optical density at these sites measured using Scion software. This optical density was average and background measurements from serial sections in which the primary antibody was omitted were taken away from the resultant value. The reproducibility of the optical density measurement was assessed in 13 specimens examined on 2 separate occasions 5 days apart by the same observer. The concordance correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.95 to 0.98).

Western Analysis
The proximal internal carotid (PIC) and common carotid (CC) parts of the endarterectomy samples to be used for Western analysis were isolated and stored frozen at –80°C for latter analysis. Frozen samples were ground under liquid nitrogen and total protein extracted and measured by the Bradford technique;27 30 µg of protein from each sample was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nylon membranes to blot against OPG (Imgenex, 1 in 500), OPN (LF-166, 1 in 500), and RANKL (Chemicon, 1 in 200) antibodies. Blots were developed with enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham), digitally scanned (Bio-Rad, Chemidoc XRS), and analyzed (Bio-Rad, Quantity One). Protein concentrations were assessed by densitometry and results presented as mean±standard error for ratios of the protein density of specimens removed from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients.27,29

Explant Culture
Freshly excised endarterectomy samples were washed in tissue medium to remove thrombus and 10-mm2 specimens were cut from the proximal internal and common carotid arteries under sterile conditions. The samples were then cut into quarters, 2 samples saved for initial plaque assessment and 2 available for culture. Initially, 1 sample each from the common and internal carotid artery were placed in tissue culture wells, intima up, in 1.5 mL of medium and incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. In subsequent experiments, 2 samples were used each from the common and internal carotid arteries. One sample from each site was incubated in the presence of irbesartan (1 mg/mL), whereas the other was incubated without medication as control. The dose of irbesartan was based on published safe serum levels of these medications achieved in patients on treatment.30 The culture medium was replaced every 48 hours and the harvested medium centrifuged (10 000g for 60 seconds) to remove particulate debris and stored frozen in aliquots at –80°C until analyzed for OPG and RANKL by ELISA, and total protein was analyzed using the Bradford method.27 Explants from days 0 and 8 were stored frozen for later assessment. The viability of explant cultures was investigated using histology, immunohistochemistry, and ATP measurement in a preliminary study. In this initial viability study, 24 biopsy specimens (5 mm2) taken from 4 carotid endarterectomies were cultured for up to 8 days. Tissue morphology and cell type were examined in 5-µm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin and using antibodies to CD68, CD3, and smooth muscle {alpha}-actin. Sections were examined by a senior pathologist (A.K.Y.L.) blinded to the culture conditions to assess cell morphology, type, and number on high-power fields (x40). Cells counts were graded as: 0, <5; I, 5 to 9; II, 10 to 20; III, >20. Intraobserver agreement was 92%. Examination of sections taken from explants cultured up to 8 days demonstrated distinct cell membranes, nuclear staining, and preservation of viable cells. For example, the median macrophage counts were graded as I for both freshly excised and plaques cultured for 8 days. Tissue viability of explants was further assessed by measurement of ATP concentrations using a commercially available kit (Sigma).27 Viability of specimens treated with irbesartan (n=4) or untreated (n=4) was assessed by comparison of tissue ATP with that in specimens frozen before culture (n=4). No significant difference between samples was detected (preculture, 2.1±0.3; cultured 8 days, 1.9±0.3; cultured 8 days in the presence of irbesartan 2.4±0.3 ng ATP/mg tissue; P>0.5).

Data Analysis
Blood measurements, immunostaining optical densities, Western analysis densitometry, and ELISA concentrations were expressed as mean and standard error and were compared by t test.27,29 Nominal data were compared by {chi}2 test with Yates correction.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A total of 44 patients (24 with recent symptoms and 20 without symptoms) were included in the study. Mean age was 70±2 years, 36 (81%) were male, and 10 (23%) patients had diabetes. Gender, mean age, prevalence of diabetes, serum creatinine, cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, homocysteine, and OPN were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Serum OPG (2.1±0.1 versus 1.7±0.1; P=0.03) and C-reactive protein (5.6±1.1 versus 2.8±0.5; P=0.05) were higher in symptomatic patients.

OPG Is Expressed at Higher Concentrations in Symptomatic Plaques
Immunohistochemistry demonstrated OPG within the intima of atherosclerotic biopsy specimens taken from the proximal internal and common carotid arteries (Figures 1 and 2Down). The protein is expressed in a sheet-like pattern near areas of vascular calcification (Figure 2A and 2B). On high-power magnification, the protein can also be demonstrated adjacent to VSMCs and inflammatory cells on serial sections (Figure 2C through 2F). The mean optical density of OPG staining was significantly greater in the PIC of symptomatic plaques (Table 1). On Western analysis, the concentration of OPG within the proximal internal carotid artery was 2-fold higher in endarterectomy specimens removed from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients (Figure 3). No significant difference could be demonstrated in the concentration of OPG at the common carotid artery in relation to symptoms (Table 1, Figure 3).



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry for noncollagenous matrix proteins in carotid atherosclerosis. Immunostaining for OPG (A, B), OPN (C, D), and RANKL (E, F) in sections of the proximal internal carotid part of the endarterectomy specimen removed from symptomatic (A, C, E) and asymptomatic patients (B, D, F). Photomicrographs are taken at 400x magnification and demonstrate greater staining for OPG and OPN in specimens from symptomatic patients. OPN indicates osteopontin; OPG, osteoprotegerin; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand.



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunostaining for OPG in carotid atherosclerosis. Serial sections demonstrate the distribution of OPG (A, C, E) in relation to calcification (B), macrophages (D), and vascular smooth muscle cells (F). Staining for OPG is principally related to calcification but is also present adjacent to macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells (magnification x400).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Comparison of OPN, OPG, and RANKL Concentrations in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Plaques Using Immunohistochemistry and Image Analysis



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Western analysis of the concentration of OPG, OPN, and RANKL in carotid atherosclerosis. Results are presented as the ratios of protein densities for atherosclerosis removed from the proximal internal (A) and common carotid (B) arteries comparing symptomatic to asymptomatic patients. The OPG and OPN concentrations are 2- and 4-fold greater in atherosclerosis removed from the proximal internal carotid artery of symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients (A) (P<0.01). Protein concentrations do not differ significantly in the common carotid artery (B). An example blot for proximal internal carotid samples is shown (C).

OPG Is Secreted in Greater Amounts From Symptomatic Carotid Explants
Explants taken from the common (n=20) and proximal internal carotid (n=20) of endarterectomy specimens removed from 12 symptomatic and 8 asymptomatic patients were cultured for 8 days and the secretion of OPG into medium was monitored (Table 2). The amount of OPG secreted by explants was similar throughout the culture period (days 0 to 2, 210±16 pg/mg compared with days 6 to 8, 204±18 pg/mg). However, the OPG secreted by proximal internal carotid specimens removed from symptomatic patients was significantly greater than those removed from asymptomatic patients (Table 2). Considering all explants together (PIC and CC), the mean OPG secreted per 48-hour period from 24 symptomatic explants was 227±10 pg/mg compared with 159±11 pg/mg from 16 explants removed from asymptomatic patients (P<0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. OPG Secretion From Explants in Relation to Symptoms and Site

OPG Secretion From Carotid Atherosclerotic Explants Is Reduced by Irbesartan
To investigate the effect of angiotensin II blockade on OPG secretion, further proximal internal carotid explants were incubated with and without irbesartan. The angiotensin II blocker led to a rapid reduction in the secretion of OPG by explants from symptomatic patients without significantly affecting that secreted by explants from asymptomatic patients (Figure 4). The amount of OPG secreted by explants from symptomatic patients was reduced within 48 hours of incubation with irbesartan (108±16 with and 167±17 without irbesartan, n=10, P=0.03).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Secretion of OPG by proximal internal carotid atherosclerosis is reduced by incubation with irbesartan. The quantity of OPG secreted by explants of carotid atherosclerosis removed from symptomatic (A) and asymptomatic (B) patients in the presence or absence of irbesartan (1 mg/mL) is illustrated. Irbesartan significantly reduces OPG secreted by explants of symptomatic atherosclerosis.

OPN Expression Is Greater in Symptomatic Than in Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis
Staining for OPN was demonstrated adjacent to areas of intimal calcification. The mean optical density of OPN staining was significantly greater in the PIC of symptomatic plaques (Table 1, Figure 1). On Western analysis, the concentration of OPN within the proximal internal carotid artery was 4-fold higher in endarterectomy specimens removed from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic patients (Figure 3).

RANKL Expression Is Similar in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis
Unlike OPG and OPN, the concentration of RANKL within the PIC and CC of carotid atherosclerosis was unrelated to symptoms (Table 1, Figures 1 and 3Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we have demonstrated increased concentrations of OPG and OPN within symptomatic or unstable compared with asymptomatic or stable atherosclerosis. Western analysis suggests a 2- and 4-fold upregulation of OPG and OPN, respectively, in symptomatic atherosclerosis (Figure 3). The increased concentration of these proteins is limited to the main site of atherosclerosis, ie, the proximal internal carotid. We also found a smaller increase in the concentration of serum OPG but not OPN in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. An elevated concentration of serum OPG in patients with more severe atherosclerosis has been previously reported in relation to coronary artery disease and presumably relates to release of the cytokine from the diseased arteries.31

The possible sources of OPG and OPN within atherosclerosis include VSMCs, macrophages, and endothelial cells.15–17 In vitro studies have demonstrated the upregulation of OPG and OPN expression in these cell types by proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF{alpha}.32,33 Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that OPG and OPN were mainly distributed around areas of calcification but also were associated with inflammatory cells and VSMCs (Figure 2). Thus, it is likely that these 2 cells types are mainly responsible for release of these proteins.

The high concentrations of OPG and OPN could be responsible for a number of changes within the atherosclerotic plaque that would promote plaque instability. Both proteins have been associated with arterial decalcification, a change that might favor plaque rupture.12–17 OPN has been shown to be chemotactic for inflammatory cells, thereby promoting infiltration of macrophages and resultant release of proteinolytic enzymes.15 Within bone, OPG had been shown to modulate release of matrix-degrading enzymes such as cathepsins and therefore may also have an important influence on plaque stability.18

Angiotensin II has been implicated in atherosclerosis progression, and trials using angiotensin II blockade suggest an improved outcome beyond any blood pressure-lowering effect.34 For example, in the PROGRESS trial in which patients with symptoms of stroke or transient ischemic attack were treated with a regimen including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, there was a relative risk reduction of stroke of 28% over 4 years, despite only a small effect on blood pressure.34 We suspected that angiotensin II blockade might be able to reduce levels of OPG and OPN secreted by atherosclerosis, because angiotensin II has previously been shown to upregulate these proteins in animal and cell culture studies.20,21 We found that in vitro irbesartan reduces the secretion of OPG by unstable atherosclerosis explants as early as 48 hours after treatment (Figure 4). This effect could eliminate the potential plaque destabilizing effects of OPG, such as decalcification and matrix degradation.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates increased concentrations of OPG and OPN within unstable atherosclerosis. The high concentrations of these proteins could have important implications for plaque stability, and work is underway to investigate the functional consequences of these changes.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to The Sylvia Charles and Viertel Foundation, The Ramaciotti Foundation, The National Health & Medical Research Council, The James Cook University Merit Grant Scheme, Pfizer CVL grants, and The Townsville Hospital Private Practice Fund for financial support for this study. The authors are grateful to Dr F.G. Quigley for entering patients into the study and providing samples. We are also grateful to Dr Larry Fisher for providing antiosteopontin antibody LF 166.

Received February 17, 2004; revision received March 8, 2004; accepted March 17, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Berliner JA, Navab M, Fogelman AM, Frank JS, Demer LL, Edwards PA, Watson AD, Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2488–2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 15: 1512–1531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, Guerci AD. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1951–1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pitt B, Rubenfire M. Risk stratification for the detection of preclinical coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2610–2612.[Free Full Text]
  5. Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shaveelle RM, Tang W, Ginzton LE, Budoff MJ, Narahara KA. Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2633–2638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lal BK, Hobson RW, Pappas PJ, Kubicka R, Hameed M, Chakhtura EY, Jamil Z, Padberg FT, Hase PB, Duran WN. Pixel distribution analysis of B-mode ultrasound scan images predicts histologic features of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35: 1210–1217.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikuchi SA, McKinsey JF, Piano G, Gewertz BL, Glagov S. Juxtaluminal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 26: 585–594.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmini R, Yao JST. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 23: 755–766.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hunt JL, Fairman R, Mitchell ME, Carpenter JP, Golden M, Khalapyan T, Wolfe M, Neschis D, Milner R, Scoll B, Cusack A, Mohler ER 3rd. Bone formation in carotid plaques: a clinicopathological study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1214–1219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shemesh J, Apter S, Itzchak Y, Motro M. Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT. Radiology. 2003; 226: 483–488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Beckman JA, Ganz J, Creager MA, Ganz P, Kinlay S. Relationship of clinical presentation and calcification of culprit coronary artery stenoses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1618–1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Richardson PD, Davies MJ, Born GVR. Influence of plaque configuration and stress distribution on fissuring of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 1989; 2: 941–944.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Lee RT, Grodzinsky AJ, Frank EH, Kamm RD, Schoen FJ. Structure-dependent dynamic mechanical behaviour of fibrous caps from human atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 1991; 83: 1764–1770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Huang H, Virmani R, Younis H, Burke AP, Kamm RD, Lee RT. The impact of calcification on the biomechanical stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1051–1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gravallese EM. Osteopontin: a bridge between bone and the immune system. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112: 147–149.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Steitz SA, Speer MY, McKee MD, Liaw L, Almeida M, Yang H, Giachelli CM. Osteopontin inhibits mineral deposition and promotes regression of ectopic calcification. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161: 2035–2046.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Schoppet M, Preissner KT, Hofbauer LC. RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin. Paracrine regulators of bone metabolism and vascular function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 549–553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wittrant Y, Couillaud S, Theoleyre S, Dunstan C, Heymann D, Redini F. Osteoprotegerin differentially regulates protease expression in osteoclast cultures. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 293: 38–44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Redlich K, Hayer S, Maier A, Dunstan CR, Tohidast-Akrad M, Lang S, Turk B, Pietschmann P, Woloszczuk W, Haralambous S, Kollias G, Steiner G, Smolen JS, Schett G. Tumour necrosis factor alpha-mediated joint destruction is inhibited by targeting osteoclasts with osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46: 785–792.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Zhang J, Fu M, Myles D, Zhu X, Du J, Cao X, Chen YE. PDGF induces osteoprotegerin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells by multiple signal pathways. FEBS Lett. 2002; 521: 180–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. deBlois D, Lombardi DM, Su EJ, Clowes AW, Schwartz SM, Giachelli CM. Angiotensin II induction of osteopontin expression and DNA replication in rat arteries. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 1055–1063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Golledge J, Cuming R, Beattie DK, Davies AH, Greenhalgh RM. The influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 24: 120–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Golledge J, Ellis M, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T, Davies AH, Greenhalgh RM. Duplex criteria for defining carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30: 122–130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond W, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974; 20: 470–475.[Abstract]
  25. Bucolo G, David H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 476–482.[Abstract]
  26. Bartels H, Bohmer M, Heierli C. Serum creatinine determination without protein precipitation. Clin Chim Acta. 1972; 37: 193–197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Golledge J, Turner RJ, Harley SL, Springall DR, Powell JT. Circumferential deformation and shear stress induce differential responses in saphenous vein endothelium exposed to arterial flow. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 2719–2726.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Smith MD, Barg E, Weedon H, Papengelis V, Smeets T, Tak PP, Kraan M, Coleman M, Ahern MJ. Microarchitecture and protective mechanisms in synovial tissue from clinically and arthroscopically normal knee joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62: 303–307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Gosling M, Golledge J, Turner RJ, Powell JT. Arterial flow conditions downregulate thrombomodulin on saphenous vein endothelium. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1047–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ruilope, L. Human pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of irbesartan: a new potent angiotensin II receptor antagonist. J Hypertens. 1997; 15 (suppl): S15–S20.
  31. Jono S, Ikari Y, Shioi A, Mori K, Miki T, Hara K, Nishizawa Y. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1192–1194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sakata M, Shiba H, Komatsuzawa H, Fujita T, Uchida Y, Yoshino H, Ogawa T, Kawaguchi H, Kurihara H. Osteoprotegerin levels increased by interleukin-1ß in human periodontal ligament cells are suppressed through prostaglandin E2 synthesized de novo. Cytokine. 2002; 18: 133–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Palmqvist P, Persson E, Conaway HH, Lerner UH. IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M stimulate bone resorption and regulate the expression of receptor activator of NF{kappa}B ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF{kappa}B in mouse calvariae. J Immunol. 2002; 169: 3353–3362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1033–1041.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. H. Mangan, A. V. Campenhout, C. Rush, and J. Golledge
Osteoprotegerin upregulates endothelial cell adhesion molecule response to tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} associated with induction of angiopoietin-2
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 494 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kiechl, G. Schett, J. Schwaiger, K. Seppi, P. Eder, G. Egger, P. Santer, A. Mayr, Q. Xu, and J. Willeit
Soluble Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, July 24, 2007; 116(4): 385 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Golledge, S. Mangan, and P. Clancy
Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Ligands in Modulating Tissue Factor and Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor in Acutely Symptomatic Carotid Atheromas
Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1501 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Golledge, J. Muller, N. Shephard, P. Clancy, L. Smallwood, C. Moran, A. E. Dear, L. J. Palmer, and P. E. Norman
Association Between Osteopontin and Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(3): 655 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
B. J. Bennett, M. Scatena, E. A. Kirk, M. Rattazzi, R. M. Varon, M. Averill, S. M. Schwartz, C. M. Giachelli, and M. E. Rosenfeld
Osteoprotegerin Inactivation Accelerates Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesion Progression and Calcification in Older ApoE-/- Mice
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(9): 2117 - 2124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Brenner, J. Labreuche, P.-J. Touboul, K. Schmidt-Petersen, O. Poirier, C. Perret, J. Schonfelder, C. Combadiere, M. Lathrop, F. Cambien, et al.
Cytokine Polymorphisms Associated With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Stroke Patients
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1691 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Golledge, L. Jones, L. Oliver, F. Quigley, and M. Karan
Folic Acid, Vitamin B12, MTHFR Genotypes, and Plasma Homocysteine.
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 1205 - 1206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Minoretti, C. Falcone, M. Calcagnino, E. Emanuele, M. P. Buzzi, E. Coen, and D. Geroldi
Prognostic significance of plasma osteopontin levels in patients with chronic stable angina
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2006; 27(7): 802 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Tedgui and Z. Mallat
Cytokines in Atherosclerosis: Pathogenic and Regulatory Pathways
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 515 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
W. J. Sandberg, A. Yndestad, E. Oie, C. Smith, T. Ueland, O. Ovchinnikova, A.-K. L. Robertson, F. Muller, A. G. Semb, H. Scholz, et al.
Enhanced T-Cell Expression of RANK Ligand in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Possible Role in Plaque Destabilization
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 857 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. L. Higgins, S. A. Marvel, and J. D. Morrisett
Quantification of Calcification in Atherosclerotic Lesions
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(8): 1567 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. S. Moran, M. McCann, M. Karan, P. Norman, N. Ketheesan, and J. Golledge
Association of Osteoprotegerin With Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression
Circulation, June 14, 2005; 111(23): 3119 - 3125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
T. Nagasaki, M. Inaba, S. Jono, Y. Hiura, H. Tahara, K. Shirakawa, N. Onoda, T. Ishikawa, E. Ishimura, and Y. Nishizawa
Increased levels of serum osteoprotegerin in hypothyroid patients and its normalization with restoration of normal thyroid function
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 152(3): 347 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. L. Demer and M. Abedin
Skeleton key to vascular disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 1977 - 1979.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/7/1636    most recent
01.STR.0000129790.00318.a3v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karan, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis