(Stroke. 2004;35:1862.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Neurological-Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit and the Departments of Neurology (A.A.R., J.R.F., E.M.M., J.L.D.A., E.F.M.W.), Neurosurgery (J.A.F., J.L.D.A.), and Biostatistics (S.D.W., R.L.M.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Dr Eelco F.M. Wijdicks, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, W8B, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail wijde{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We evaluated all patients admitted to our hospital with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage between 1998 and 2000. Cerebral infarction was defined as a new hypodensity located in a vascular distribution on computed tomography (CT) scan.
Results Fifty-seven of 143 patients (40%) developed a cerebral infarction. On univariate analysis, occurrence of cerebral infarction was associated with a worse World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade (P=0.01), use of ventriculostomy catheter (P=0.01), preoperative vasospasm (P=0.03), surgical clipping (P=0.02), symptomatic vasospasm (P<0.01), and vasospasm on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) or repeat angiogram (P<0.01). On multivariable analysis, only presence of symptoms ascribed to vasospasm (P<0.01) and evidence of vasospasm on TCD or angiogram predicted cerebral infarction (P<0.01). TCD and angiogram agreed on the diagnosis of vasospasm in 73% of cases (95% CI, 63% to 81%), but the diagnostic accuracy of this combination of tests was suboptimal for the prediction of cerebral infarction occurrence (sensitivity, 0.72; specificity, 0.68; positive predictive value, 0.67; negative predictive value, 0.72). Location of the cerebral infarction on delayed CT was predicted by neurological symptoms in 74%, by aneurysm location in 77%, and by angiographic vasospasm in 67%.
Conclusions Evidence of vasospasm on TCD and angiogram is predictive of cerebral infarction on CT scan but sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. Cerebral infarction location cannot be predicted in one quarter to one third of patients by any of the studied clinical or radiological variables.
Key Words: cerebral angiography forecasting stroke subarachnoid hemorrhage ultrasonography, transcranial, Doppler
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brain ischemia may occur in patients without apparent vasospasm on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) or angiogram. Conversely, documented vasospasm does not always portend neurological deterioration.6 Most studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of TCD or angiogram used delayed neurological ischemic deficits (or symptomatic vasospasm) as the primary outcome measure. Much less is known about the value of these diagnostic tests to predict cerebral infarction on brain imaging.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TCD recordings of the mean blood flow velocity (cm/sec) of the major anterior circulation vessels were measured through the transtemporal window using a 2-MHz hand-held transducer probe. Studies were performed daily or every other day by 2 experienced technicians. Mean arterial velocities >120 cm/sec on the anterior, middle, or posterior cerebral arteries were deemed indicative of vasospasm. Patients typically had 1 angiographic study 3 to 5 days after aneurysm treatment. Repeated angiograms (up to 5 studies in this series) were performed when the diagnosis of vasospasm remained in question or endovascular treatment was being considered. Angiographic vasospasm was considered present when there was unequivocal narrowing of the arterial vessel lumen by visual inspection. It was regarded as severe when the estimated narrowing of the arterial vessel lumen exceeded 50% of the normal caliber. Angiographic vasospasm was defined as focal if it was limited to either the anterior circulation on one side or the posterior circulation on the other side. Conversely, the vasospasm was considered diffuse if it was bilateral or involved vessels in both the anterior and the posterior circulations. When vasospasm was focal, the affected arteries on TCD and angiogram were specifically tabulated.
Upon admission, all patients were treated with intravenous fluids to maintain euvolemia. Before aneurysm was secured, systolic blood pressure was kept <160 mm Hg in most cases. Selection of treatment with craniotomy and clipping or endovascular coil occlusion resulted from a consensus reached between the treating neurosurgeon and the interventional neuroradiologist after analyzing risks and chances of success of both therapeutic modalities on each particular case. Factors considered during the decision-making process included aneurysmal dome to neck ratio, presence of major or perforating branches off the aneurysm, and surgical or endovascular accessibility. A single interventional neuroradiologist performed all endovascular procedures. Oral nimodipine was administered to all patients for prophylaxis of cerebral vasospasm from the time of admission following a standardized protocol (60 mg every 4 hours for 21 days). Hemodynamic augmentation therapy was rapidly instituted in patients with symptomatic vasospasm. Typically, crystalloids were initially administered to achieve a central venous pressure >8 mm Hg. If symptoms persisted, phenylephrine or a combination of phenylephrine and dopamine were infused to raise the mean arterial pressure by 20% to 25% (or to levels >120 mm Hg if baseline mean arterial pressure was <100 mm Hg). In refractory cases, a pulmonary artery catheter was placed and boluses of crystalloid were administered until increase in pulmonary artery wedge pressure did not result in further increase in systolic volume index (preload optimization). Also, intravenous dobutamine was infused and titrated to keep the cardiac index >3.5 (cardiac index optimization). Endovascular procedures (angioplasty or intra-arterial papaverine) were performed when medical treatment failed to reverse the symptoms. Timing of endovascular intervention was decided by the treating consultants.
Cerebral infarction was defined radiologically as a new hypodensity located in a vascular distribution on the CT scan. Cerebral infarctions possibly related to complications of surgery or angiography (such as large vessel occlusion, perforator vessel occlusion, or arterial rupture or dissection) were noted but excluded from further analysis. Resolving postsurgical hypodensities were considered consistent with brain edema from retraction. All arterial territories involved were recorded to assess the correlation with the vessels showing vasospasm on TCD or angiogram. A single vascular neurologist (A.A.R.), who was blinded at the time to clinical information and functional outcome, reviewed all CT scans and ascribed each cerebral infarction to the corresponding vascular territory using validated arterial territory maps.7
Symptomatic vasospasm was defined as documented arterial vasospasm consistent with new neurological deficits presenting within 21 days after onset of SAH and not explained by other causes of neurological deterioration (rebleeding, acute or worsening hydrocephalus, electrolyte disturbances, or hypoxia or seizures). Clinical deficits were classified as focal if the patient had new signs of neurological impairment but remained alert or only drowsy. All focal deficits were ascribed to the vascular territory that could best explain the symptoms. Global deficit was defined by the presence of stupor or coma (Glasgow coma scale sum score <10).
The primary outcome measure in our study was the occurrence of radiographic cerebral infarction. Secondary outcome measure was the functional status at the time of last follow-up using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) for assessment.
Statistical Analysis
We used the SAS software (SAS Institute Inc, SAS OnlineDoc Version 8). To evaluate whether there was a univariate association between cerebral infarction and quantitative risk factors, we used Wilcoxon rank sum tests. For categorical risk factors and cerebral infarction, we used
2 tests.
We further evaluated predictors of cerebral infarction in a multivariable setting using 2 distinct logistic regression models. In the first model, we specified a set of 7 independent variables in advance of any analyses. These variables were selected based on their presumed biological and clinical importance. The variables were sex, age, radiographic vasospasm by TCD or angiogram, Fisher grade, World Federation of Neurosurgery (WFNS) grade, SAH treatment, and aneurysm location. The number of variables chosen was limited by the number of cerebral infarction events. To expand on this analysis, we fit a second logistic regression model that included the 6 variables that were univariately associated with cerebral infarction (P<0.05).
We tested the sensitivity and specificity of TCD versus angiogram using the McNemar test among patients with cerebral infarction who received both radiographic measures and among the patients without cerebral infarction who were studied by both techniques. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radiological cerebral infarctions occurred in 57 patients (40% of the study population). The distribution of demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics according to cerebral infarction occurrence is shown in Table 1. On univariate analysis, clinical grade by WFNS (P=0.01), use of ventriculostomy catheter (P=0.01), preoperative vasospasm (P=0.03), surgical clipping (P=0.02), symptomatic vasospasm (P<0.01), and evidence of vasospasm by TCD or angiogram (P<0.01) were significantly associated with the occurrence of cerebral infarction. Using 2 different multiple logistic regression models, only symptomatic vasospasm and evidence of vasospasm by TCD or angiogram remained predictive of cerebral infarction. Details of the multivariate model are displayed in Tables 2a and 2
b.
|
|
|
TCD indicated presence of vasospasm in 85 of 120 of patients (71%) on whom this study was serially performed. Meanwhile, vasospasm was noted in 60 of 113 patients (53%) who had follow-up angiograms. The rate of agreement between TCD and angiogram in the detection of vasospasm in our population was 73% (95% CI, 63% to 81%). The angiogram was marginally more specific (63% versus 44%, P=0.083) but less sensitive than TCD (75% versus 90%, P<0.01) in predicting the occurrence of cerebral infarction. In fact, the odds ratio (OR) estimate for the occurrence of cerebral infarction was higher in patients with vasospasm detected by TCD (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.6 to 21) than in those with vasospasm detected by an angiogram (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.2 to 11.7), although with very wide CIs. We then studied the effects of combining the results of both tests on their diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of cerebral infarction. When both studies showed vasospasm, the positive predictive value of this diagnostic combination for the occurrence of cerebral infarction was 67%. Conversely, when both studies indicated absence of vasospasm, the negative predictive value of this combination was 72% (Table 3).
|
The location of vasospasm on TCD and on angiogram accurately predicted cerebral infarction location on CT scan in 82% and 67% of cases, respectively. Thus, there was no evidence of angiographic vasospasm in the arterial tree corresponding to the area of radiological cerebral infarction in 33% of patients with cerebral infarction. Aneurysm location corresponded to the area of cerebral infarction in 77% of patients. Focal symptoms predicted cerebral infarction location in 74% of patients.
Cerebral infarction was predictive of worse functional outcome. The median mRS score was 1 among patients who did not have a cerebral infarction and 3 among those patients who did (P<0.01). Seventy percent of patients with cerebral infarction had poor functional outcome (mRS >2) compared with 17% in the group without cerebral infarction. The mortality rate at last follow-up was 23% in the group of patients with cerebral infarction versus only 5% among patients without cerebral infarction (P<0.01). Median follow-up among survivors was 12 months (range 1 to 36 months). Median length of stay was significantly longer for the group of patients with cerebral infarction (17.5±8.6 days versus 14±10.8 days for the group without cerebral infarction; P<0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, treatment modality (surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling) was not independently associated with the occurrence of cerebral infarction in multivariable analysis, despite a trend suggesting increased risk with surgical clipping. The confidence intervals were very wide, suggesting that significance may have been limited by a low patient number. In a larger study, we found surgical clipping to be associated with increased risk of stroke compared with endovascular coil embolization in patients with a good clinical grade.8 In the current series, the Fisher grade did not correlate with the occurrence of cerebral infarction in either univariate or multivariable analysis. A previous study has questioned the predictive value of the Fisher grade.9 Software-based techniques to quantify SAH on admission CT scan may be of greater value in predicting vasospasm.10
Although focal symptomatic vasospasm may often be recognized by the development of localizing signs, the more common diffuse vasospasm may manifest more insidiously with a declining level of consciousness. As a consequence, defining symptomatic vasospasm is frequently challenging, both in research studies and at the bedside. For that reason, we chose brain infarction documented by CT scan as the main outcome measure of our study, as opposed to the more commonly used symptomatic vasospasm.
Studies using MRI have revealed that delayed ischemic lesions after SAH are usually bilateral and multifocal, often involve the frontal lobes, and are not uncommonly asymptomatic.5,11 It has been postulated that the lack of correlation of some of these lesions with angiographically-documented arterial narrowing may be because angiography does not have the sensitivity to visualize small-vessel spasm.11 Small-vessel spasm could also explain the dissociation between evidence of vasospasm by TCD or angiography and the presence of cognitive impairment after SAH.12 In fact, ischemic lesions, but not symptomatic vasospasm, have been found to be predictive of cognitive dysfunction in these patients.
Microembolism could be an alternative explanation for the occurrence of brain ischemic damage in the absence of vasospasm. Microembolic signals are frequently detected by TCD monitoring in patients with SAH with and without vasospasm;13 however, the clinical relevance of this finding remains to be established.
In general, TCD fares rather modestly in studies that used angiography as the "gold standard" for the definition of vasospasm.7,14 Meanwhile, when clinical deterioration was used to define vasospasm, TCD was found to be as sensitive as cerebral angiography.15 Against this background, our results offer new information that may enhance our understanding of the value of these 2 diagnostic techniques. We found that, in our experience, TCD was actually more sensitive but less specific than angiography in predicting the occurrence of cerebral infarction on CT scan. TCD and angiography disagreed in slightly more than 1 in 4 cases, and the combination of both tests still failed to provide high diagnostic accuracy.
In this study, the topography of the cerebral infarction on a CT scan was not predicted reliably by the location of documented vasospasm (by TCD or angiography), the location of the ruptured aneurysm, or the clinical manifestations of the patient. Therefore, cerebral ischemia was not infrequently subclinical or clinically subtle, and it may have been caused by vasospasm that could not be detected by our standard diagnostic techniques.
We acknowledge that our study design has limitations. Although we tried to restrict our definition of cerebral infarction on a CT scan to focus on lesions likely caused by vasospasm, we cannot exclude that some of the ischemic lesions may have been caused by mechanisms other than vasospasm (eg, perforator vessel occlusion unnoticed at the time of surgical clipping or coil embolization, or delayed consequences of a dissection provoked during catheterization but undetected on an angiogram). Our definition of ultrasonographic vasospasm did not include measurement of the Lindegaard ratio; this measurement could have enhanced the specificity of TCD results by helping differentiate true vasospasm from hyperemia.16 Conversely, the diagnostic yield of angiography may have been limited by inappropriate timing or insufficient repetition of angiograms in patients who developed delayed ischemic damage. Also, it is conceivable that less conservative criteria for the definition of angiographic vasospasm could have enhanced the sensitivity of the test. Metallic artifacts from clips and coils used to secure the ruptured aneurysm may have interfered with the precise interpretation of findings in the CT scan, especially in the posterior fossa. Nevertheless, we consider that none of these potential limitations negates the validity of our results.
We conclude that evidence of vasospasm on TCD and angiogram is predictive of cerebral infarction on a CT scan. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these tests in predicting the occurrence of cerebral infarction are suboptimal.
Received April 14, 2004; revision received April 29, 2004; accepted May 4, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Solenski NJ, Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF, Kongable G, Germanson T, Truskowski L, Torner JC. Medical complications of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a report of the multicenter, cooperative aneurysm study. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23: 10071017.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Hirashima Y, Kurimoto M, Takaba M, Endo S, Takaku A. The use of computed tomography in the prediction of delayed cerebral infarction following acute aneurysm surgery for subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995; 132: 913.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Forssell A, Larsson C, Ronnberg J, Fodstad H. CT assessment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. A comparison between different CT methods of grading subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg. 1995; 9: 2127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kivisaari RP, Salonen O, Servo A, Autti T, Hernesniemi J, Ohman J. MR imaging after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery: a long-term follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 11431148.
6. Laumer R, Steinmeier R, Gonner F, Vogtmann T, Priem R, Fahlbusch R. Cerebral hemodynamics in subarachnoid hemorrhage evaluated by transcranial Doppler sonography. Part 1. Reliability of flow velocities in clinical management. Neurosurgery. 1993; 33: 18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology. 1998; 50: 16991708.
8. Rabinstein AA, Pichelmann MA, Friedman JA, Piepgras DG, Nichols DA, McIver JI, Toussaint LG 3rd, McClelland RL, Fulgham JR, Meyer FB, Atkinson JL, Wijdicks EF. Symptomatic vasospasm and outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison between surgical repair and endovascular coil occlusion. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98: 319325.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Claassen J, Bernardini GL, Kreiter K, Bates J, Du YE, Copeland D, Connoly ES, Mayer SA. Effect of cisternal and ventricular blood on risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the Fisher scale revisited. Stroke. 2001; 32: 20122020.
10. Friedman JA, Goerss SJ, Meyer FB, Piepgras DG, Pichelmann MA, McIver JI, Toussaint LG 3rd, McClelland RL, Nichols DA, Atkinson JL, Wijdicks EF. Volumetric quantification of Fisher Grade 3 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a novel method to predict symptomatic vasospasm on admission computerized tomography scans. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97: 401407.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sloan MA, Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF, Henry ML, Stewart SR, Beskin RR, Sevilla EA, Torner JC. Sensitivity and specificity of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 1989; 39: 15141518.
12. Hadjivassiliou M, Tooth CL, Romanowski CA, Byrne J, Battersby RD, Oxbury S, Crewswell CS, Burkitt E, Stokes NA, Paul C, Mayes AR, Sagar HJ. Aneurysmal SAH: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology. 2001; 56: 16721677.
13. Romano JG, Forteza AM, Concha M, Koch S, Heros RC, Morcos JJ, Babikian VL. Detection of microemboli by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2002; 50: 10261030.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Burch CM, Wozniak MA, Sloan MA, Sloan MA, Rothman MI, Rogamonti D, Permutt T, Numaguchi Y. Detection of intracranial internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neuroimaging. 1996; 6: 815.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Yahia AB, Parekh PD, Tamargo RJ, Williams MA, Ulatowski JA, Hanley DF, Razumovsky AY. T. Symptomatic vasospasm diagnosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage: evaluation of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and cerebral angiography as related to compromised vascular distribution. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: 13481355.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lindegaard KF, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P. Cerebral vasospasm diagnosis by means of angiography and blood velocity measurements. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989; 100: 1224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Dankbaar, N. K. de Rooij, B. K. Velthuis, C. J.M. Frijns, G. J.E. Rinkel, and I. C. van der Schaaf Diagnosing Delayed Cerebral Ischemia With Different CT Modalities in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage With Clinical Deterioration Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3493 - 3498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G J E Rinkel and C J M Klijn Prevention and treatment of medical and neurological complications in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage Practical Neurology, August 1, 2009; 9(4): 195 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoff, G. Rinkel, B. Verweij, A. Algra, and C. Kalkman Blood Volume Measurement to Guide Fluid Therapy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Controlled Study Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2575 - 2577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Frontera, A. Fernandez, J. M. Schmidt, J. Claassen, K. E. Wartenberg, N. Badjatia, E. S. Connolly, and S. A. Mayer Defining Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: What Is the Most Clinically Relevant Definition? Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 1963 - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.A.C. van der Bilt, D. Hasan, W. P. Vandertop, A. A.M. Wilde, A. Algra, F. C. Visser, and G. J.E. Rinkel Impact of cardiac complications on outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis Neurology, February 17, 2009; 72(7): 635 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D.I. Vergouwen, M. Vermeulen, and Y. B.W.E.M. Roos Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Angiographic Vasospasm an Epiphenomenon? Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e39 - e39. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pham, A. Johnson, A. J. Bartsch, C. Lindner, W. Mullges, K. Roosen, L. Solymosi, and M. Bendszus CT perfusion predicts secondary cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage Neurology, August 21, 2007; 69(8): 762 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jaeger, M. U. Schuhmann, M. Soehle, C. Nagel, and J. Meixensberger Continuous Monitoring of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage by Brain Tissue Oxygen Pressure Reactivity and Its Relation to Delayed Cerebral Infarction Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 981 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Nieuwkamp, G J E Rinkel, R Silva, P Greebe, D A Schokking, and J M Ferro Subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients >=75 years: clinical course, treatment and outcome J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 77(8): 933 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C J M Frijns, K M Kasius, A Algra, R Fijnheer, and G J E Rinkel Endothelial cell activation markers and delayed cerebral ischaemia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 77(7): 863 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A A Rabinstein Unravelling the causes of cerebral damage in subarachnoid haemorrhage: might biomarkers help? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 77(6): 711 - 711. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. van der Schaaf, M. J. Wermer, Y. van der Graaf, R. G. Hoff, G.J.E. Rinkel, and B. K. Velthuis CT after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Relation of cerebral perfusion to delayed cerebral ischemia Neurology, May 23, 2006; 66(10): 1533 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Rabinstein The blood and the vessel: Prediction of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage Neurology, March 14, 2006; 66(5): 622 - 623. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wintermark, N.U. Ko, W.S. Smith, S. Liu, R.T. Higashida, and W.P. Dillon Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Utility of Perfusion CT and CT Angiography on Diagnosis and Management AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 26 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K.C. Wong, R. Boet, W.S. Poon, M. T.V. Chan, W. van den Bergh, G. Rinkel, A. Algra, and On behalf of the MASH Study group Trial Design in "Magnesium Sulphate in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Randomized Controlled Trial" * Response: Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2530 - 2532. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Rabinstein, S. Weigand, J. L.D. Atkinson, and E. F.M. Wijdicks Patterns of Cerebral Infarction in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 992 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |