| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:129.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Vascular Neurology Program, Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex.
Correspondence to Dr James C. Grotta, Vascular Neurology Program, Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin St Room 7.044, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail James.c.grotta{at}uth.tmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We tested the N-terminal tripeptide of IGF-1, Gly-Pro-Glu (GPE), and its analogue, G2MePE, alone and with caffeinol in a rat middle cerebral artery (MCA) suture occlusion model. We randomly assigned rats to 6 groups of 8 to 12 animals: (1) control; (2) GPE, 3 mg/kg per hour; (3) G2MePE, 0.3 mg/kg per hour; (4) caffeinol, a mixture of caffeine (10 mg/kg) with ethanol (0.32 g/kg); (5) GPE with caffeinol (combination of group 2 with 4); and (6) G2MePE with caffeinol (combination of group 3 with 4). Drugs were started 75 minutes after suture occlusion, at the start of reperfusion. Three days after MCA occlusion, neurological deficit (Neurological Deficit Score [NDS]) and lesion volume were measured.
Results GPE and caffeinol improved NDS by 34% and 36%, respectively (P<0.01), and also decreased cortical but not striatal lesion volume compared with control (GPE cortex, 121 mm3; caffeinol cortex, 134 mm3; and control, 221 mm3; P<0.01). GPE plus caffeinol did not have more efficacy than either GPE or caffeinol alone. G2MePE slightly improved NDS (19.7%, P=0.05) but not lesion volume. However, G2MePE plus caffeinol very significantly improved NDS (64%) and lesion volume in both cortex (combination 95 mm3 versus control 221 mm3) and striatum (combination 74 mm3 versus control 110 mm3) (P<0.001), and was significantly more effective than either caffeinol or G2MePE alone.
Conclusion Both GPE and caffeinol significantly protect cortex after MCA occlusion. At the doses used in this study, the GPE analogue G2MePE by itself had minimal protective effects, but when combined with caffeinol, it demonstrated robust beneficial effects on cortical and subcortical lesion size and behavioral deficit. Further study of this combination appears justified.
Key Words: behavior growth factors ischemia neuroprotection stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In animal stroke models, our laboratory has developed and studied caffeinol, a combination of low doses of caffeine and ethanol.1214 This combination is highly effective in reducing ischemic damage, with particularly striking effect on cortex. The widespread use of both caffeine and ethanol in our society, and familiarity with its rapid onset of action and clinical toxicology, has generated substantial interest in this combination, and pilot clinical trials are underway.12
There is a general consensus among researchers in the field of "neuroprotection" for stroke that combining 2 or more complementary cytoprotective strategies to increase the potency of the treatment over any single component may be necessary to have a detectable clinical effect. Because IGF and caffeinol probably have different mechanisms of action (see Discussion), we hypothesized that when given together, the combination would have a more robust benefit than either alone. Therefore, this study aimed to test the effects of combining GPE and G2MePE with caffeinol in reducing the acute damage after middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion in rats.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rats were preselected and pretrained on the behavior tests. Behavior tests and rectal temperature were measured before surgery to exclude abnormal rats. Only rats with <20% foot fault, normal forelimb placing, and rectal temperature at 37.7±0.5°C were included and subjected to MCA occlusion.
MCA Occlusion
Focal brain ischemia was induced by the MCA occlusion intraluminal suture method as previously described by Longa.15 Briefly, the rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane in a mixture of 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide delivered by tracheal intubation. A rectal probe was inserted 4 cm into rectum and the probe was temporarily fixed to the tail. Micro-Renathane tubing (type MRE-040; Braintree Scientific Inc) was cannulated into the jugular vein for intravenous drug delivery.
The right common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, and external carotid artery were exposed through a midline neck incision. A 4-0 poly-L-lysinecoated nylon suture was inserted through a stump of the external carotid artery, and the common carotid artery was kept open and intact. The suture occluder was advanced into the internal carotid artery 19 to 21 mm beyond the carotid bifurcation. Mild resistance indicated that the occluder was properly lodged in the anterior cerebral artery and thus blocked blood flow to the MCA. The rat was allowed to awaken right after finishing the operation and the Neurological Deficit Score (NDS) was measured 60 to 65 minutes after initiation of the MCA occlusion. Rats with satisfactory deficits on NDS (NDS score 11 to 15) were re-anesthetized with isofluorine by facemask; 75 minutes after starting MCA occlusion, reperfusion was started by withdrawing the suture. The common carotid artery and internal carotid artery were inspected to ensure the return of good pulsation, and the neck incision was closed with silk suture. Drug treatments were started immediately after the start of reperfusion by connecting the precannulated tubing to a perfusion pump to infuse a 3-mL solution into the jugular vein at a speed of 1 mL/h. The rats freely moved around in a cylinder during the drug infusion by using a swivel tether system. After finishing the infusion, the rats were returned to their home cage.
Animal Groups and Doses
Rats with moderate level injury (NDS of 11 to 15 right before reperfusion) were randomly assigned to 6 groups: (1) buffer group (n=9), 3 mL of saline or 3 mL of succinate buffer (pH 6.0) at 1 mL/h for 3 hours; (2) GPE group (n=8), 9 mg/kg of GPE in 3 mL of succinate buffer at 1 mL/h for 3 hours; (3) G2MePE group (n=9), 0.9 mg/kg of G2MePE in 3 mL of saline at 1 mL/h for 3 hours; (4) caffeinol group (n=12), 10 mg/kg of caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine; Acros Organics) and 0.32 g/kg of ethanol (Quantum) in 3 mL of saline at 1 mL/h for 3 hours; (5) GPE plus caffeinol (n=12), combination of groups 2 and 4 in 3 mL saline at 1 mL/h for 3 hours; and (6) G2MePE plus caffeinol group (n=9), combination of groups 3 and 4 in 3 mL saline at 1 mL/h for 3 hours.
Rectal Temperature Measurement
Rectal temperature was measured before surgery (without anesthesia), during the process of MCA occlusion, and 72 hours after reperfusion.
Behavioral Measurements
All behavioral tests took place in a quiet and low-light room by an experimenter blinded with respect to the treatment groups. The foot fault and forelimb placing tests were performed according to previously published methods by Bland.16 The postural reflex and circling tests were performed as described by Bederson.17 NDS was measured before occlusion, before reperfusion (60 to 65 minutes after initiation of MCA occlusion), and 72 hours after MCA occlusion. NDS (0 to 18) was calculated by combining the score on the following 4 tests.
Postural Reflex Test
The degree of abnormal posture was estimated by suspending rats with their tails 20 cm above a tabletop. Intact rats extended both forelimbs toward the table surface. Rats displaying this behavior were recorded as score 0. Rats with only flexing of the contralateral limb toward the body were recorded as score 2. Rats rotating the contralateral forelimb toward the tail were graded as score 4.
Circling or Side-Walking
Rats that circled or side-walked toward the paretic side on 10 trials were recorded. A score of 2 or 4 was given to each rat according to the severity of their deficits.
Forelimb Placing (Whisker, Forward Tactile, and Lateral Tactile)
Animals were held by their torsos with forelimbs hanging freely. Contralateral and ipsilateral forelimb Whisker placing responses were induced by gently brushing the respective vibrissae on the edge of a tabletop for 10 trials. A score of 1 was given each time the rat placed its forelimb on the edge of the tabletop in response to the vibrissae stimulation. Percent successful placing responses were determined (number correct x 10). The lateral tactile placing was similar to the whisker placing, except the placing response was induced by gently contacting the lateral side of the forelimb to the edge of the tabletop, whereas forward tactile placing was induced by contacting the frontal side of the forelimb to the edge of a tabletop. The scale was scored as: 0, immediate and complete placing 8 or more out of 10 trials; 1, delayed and/or incomplete placing >2 out of 10 trials; and 2, no placing.
Foot Fault
Animals were placed on an elevated grid, with openings of 2.3 cm2. As the animals traversed the grid, a foot fault was scored each time the contralateral forepaw slipped through an opening in the grid. The total number of steps was also counted. The percent foot fault was calculated as the number of foot faults/total steps x 100. A score of 0 to 4 was given to each rat according to the severity of the deficit by calculating the percent foot faults x 0.04.
Lesion Volume Measurement
On day 3 after MCA occlusion, the rats were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 0.6 mg/kg of chloryl hydrate, intracardiac-perfused with 150 to 200 mL of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, then euthanized. The brain was removed within 30 seconds, rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline, and sliced into 2-mm sections. The sections were stained with 2% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride. After 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, each section was scanned into a Macintosh computer and analyzed by a computer-interfaced BRAIN imaging system as previously described.18 The lesion volume was calculated as the sum of 7 slices. Rats that died before 72 hours had postmortem examination of their brains but were not included in lesion volume calculation.
Statistical Analysis
Investigators blinded to treatment assignment performed all behavioral testing and subsequent histological analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 3.00 for Windows and GraphPad InStat. Behavioral tests and body weight changes were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison post hoc tests with correction for multiple comparisons. A separate ANOVA was performed for each of the time points to see at what time point the NDS scores became significantly different. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the infarct volume and behavioral tests at the 72-hour time point. All data were expressed as mean±SD. These statistical tests were 2-tailed and considered significant at the P<0.05 level. Mortality was analyzed by Fisher exact test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physiological Signs
There were no significant differences in baseline body weight between the groups (P=0.71). G2MePE combined with caffeinol significantly prevented body weight loss at 72 hours (P<0.05) compared with the buffer group, but there were no significant differences among all the other groups (Figure 1). Rectal temperature did not differ between the groups.
|
Lesion Volume
GPE significantly reduced the lesion volume in cortex (125.7 mm3; P<0.01), but not in striatum (89.5, P=0.14), compared with the buffer group (221.1 and 110.3). Caffeinol also significantly reduced cortical lesion volume (134.2; P<0.01), but not in striatum (87.0; P=0.06). G2MePE did not reduce lesion volume in either cortex or striatum (cortex 192.5, P=0.25; striatum 92.0, P=0.08).
GPE combined with caffeinol reduced cortical infarct volume to 100.50 (P<0.01) and striatal volume to 82.13 (P<0.05), but the additive effect of the combination was not significantly different from either GPE or caffeinol alone.
G2MePE combined with caffeinol displayed an additive effect compared with either G2MePE or caffeinol alone. The protective effect of the combination on lesion volume compared with buffer control was shown in the cortex (94.8, P<0.001) and also in the striatum (74.0; P<0.001) (Figure 2). When the G2MePE plus caffeinol was compared with its individual components, the combination was significantly better than G2MePE alone (P<0.05, in cortex and striatum), and also significantly better than caffeinol alone in cortex (P<0.05), but not in striatum (P=0.32).
|
Behavioral Test Results
Sensory motor deficits were improved in parallel with the changes seen in cortical lesion volume. NDS changes from before reperfusion to 72 hours for the individual tests are shown in Figure 3. The total NDS at 72 hours after reperfusion is shown in Figure 4.
|
|
GPE significantly decreased the NDS by 34% (8.35 versus 12.6; P<0.01) (Figure 4). Caffeinol reduced the NDS by 36% (8.13 versus 12.6; P<0.01). GPE combined with caffeinol was no different compared with either GPE (P=0.80) or caffeinol (P=0.43) alone.
G2MePE slightly decreased the NDS (10.1 versus 12.6, P=0.05) but, when combined with caffeinol, had a very significant effect on reducing NDS by 64% compared with buffer control (4.6 versus 12.6; P<0.001). When the G2MePE plus caffeinol group was compared with its individual components, it significantly improved NDS by 54% compared with G2MePE alone (P<0.01), and 43% compared with caffeinol alone (P<0.05).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both GPE and caffeinol decreased cortical lesion volume and improved neurological functional recovery, consistent with previous reports from different stroke models.9,13 Although there was a trend, the combination of GPE with caffeinol did not show an additive effect over GPE alone. G2MePE alone did not have much protective effect on lesion volume or NDS but had very significant additive effects when combined with caffeinol. Whereas there was a positive trend, the failure of G2MePE alone to substantially reduce damage may be related to the low dose (0.9 mg/kg).
Multiple deleterious factors have been implicated in the pathology of ischemic damage, including neurotransmitter release, ion imbalance, free-radical formation, mitochondrial dysfunction, gene expression, protein synthesis impairment, inflammation, and programmed cell death. The treatments tested in these experiments may target several of these pathways.
Special attention during the search for an effective stroke treatment has been devoted to the role of NMDA, GABA, and adenosine receptors, which are directly implicated in modulation and execution of ischemia-evoked excitotoxic damage. Adenosine modulates neuronal excitability, as well as the release of many neurotransmitters. These include the excitatory amino acids (EAA),2325 which, through activation of specific ionotropic receptors (primarily NMDA but also certain AMPA and kainate receptors), play an instrumental role in ischemia-induced Ca2+-mediated excitotoxic damage.2629
In vivo, caffeine and ethanol are readily absorbed and distributed to all body fluids, including the cerebrospinal fluid. The protective mechanism of caffeinol or the biological activities of caffeine and ethanol in stroke are still not clear. The biological activity of caffeine is highly dose-dependent and is expressed through its ability to induce the intracellular release of Ca++ (interaction at the level of IP3 and ryanodine receptor), inhibit phosphodiesterase, and block GABA and adenosine receptors.3032 The biological activities of ethanol include inhibition of excitatory NMDA receptors and activation of inhibitory GABA receptors.33
IGF-1 has substantial neuroprotective properties but does not cross the bloodbrain barrier because of its size. GPE, the active peptide component cleaved from IGF-1, can cross the bloodbrain barrier with excellent brain penetration. However, the mechanism of its neuroprotective effect is still unknown. At relatively high doses (uM range), GPE binds to the NMDA receptor (most probably at the glutamate binding site) at a concentration >10 µmol/L, where it probably acts as a partial agonist, mimicking (with lower efficacy) the effects of glutamate at 10 to 300 µmol/L, and antagonizing the effects of glutamate at >300 µmol/L. In situations of excessive glutamate release, such as occurs during stroke and brain injury, GPE acting as an NMDA receptor antagonist might inhibit the neurotoxic effects of glutamate overload. However, NMDA receptor activity of GPE probably does not explain the neuroprotective effect seen in our study because only nM concentrations of GPE are achieved in cerebrospinal fluid after infusion of neuroprotective doses. The cytoprotective effect of GPE may be mediated through its own unique receptor, but this novel binding site is still undetermined.
The main limitation of this study, besides the uncertain action of the drugs, is that we tested only one dose of GPE or G2MePE. Other doses should now be evaluated to optimize results. Also, longer duration to starting treatment should be analyzed.
In conclusion, we found that derivatives of the active segment of IGF-1 reduce acute ischemic damage and, in combination with caffeinol, have greater effect than either treatment alone. The analogue of GPE, G2MePE, in combination with caffeinol, is a potentially effective neuroprotective approach that deserves further study.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 30, 2004; revision received August 3, 2004; accepted September 1, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Fisher, A. Davalos, A. Rogalewski, A. Schneider, E. B. Ringelstein, and W.-R. Schabitz Toward a Multimodal Neuroprotective Treatment of Stroke Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1129 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |