| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:62.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (D.M.K., L.L.P., H.P.S.), TuftsNew England Medical Center Boston, Mass; the Department of Neurology (P.R.), University of Heidelberg, Germany; and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience (M.D.H.), Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr David M. Kent, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, TuftsNew England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, #63, Boston, MA, 02111. E-mail dkent1{at}tufts-nemc.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Using a combined database including subjects from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke (ATLANTIS) A and B, and the Second European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II) trials, we examined 90-day outcomes in patients randomized to rtPA versus placebo by sex. We used logistic regression to control for potential confounders.
Results Among 988 women treated between 0 and 6 hours from symptom onset, patients receiving rtPA were significantly more likely than those receiving placebo to have a modified Rankin Score
1 (40.5% versus 30.3%, P<0.0008). Among 1190 men, the trend toward benefit in the overall group did not reach statistical significance (38.5% versus 36.7%, P=0.52). An unadjusted analysis showed that women were significantly more likely to benefit from rtPA compared with men (P=0.04). Controlling for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, diabetes, symptom onset to treatment time, prior stroke, systolic blood pressure, extent of hypoattenuation on baseline computed tomography scan and several significant interaction terms (including onset to treatment timeby-treatment and systolic blood pressureby treatment) did not substantially change the strength of the interaction between gender and rtPA treatment (P=0.04).
Conclusions In this pooled analysis of rtPA in acute ischemic stroke, women benefited more than men, and the usual gender difference in outcome favoring men was not observed in the thrombolytic therapy group. For patients presenting at later time intervals, when the risks and benefits of rtPA are more finely balanced, sex may be an important variable to consider for patient selection.
Key Words: clinical trials outcome thrombolytic therapy sex factors stroke, acute
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1) in patients randomized to rtPA versus placebo by sex. These trials are described in detail in their original report and the important differences between the databases are reviewed in a recent individual patient meta-analysis.812 We used step-wise logistic regression to control for prognostically important clinical and radiological variables, using a threshold P value of 0.05 for inclusion in the model. To validate our results, we performed the same analysis using generalized estimating equations to examine the treatment-by-sex effects simultaneously across different outcome scales (the mRS, the Barthel Index and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), also referred to as the "global outcome."13 | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Overall, 90-day outcomes were similar in men and women (mRS
1: 37.7% versus 35.4%, respectively; P=0.28). However, there was a considerable difference in response to therapy (Figure 1). Among men treated within 6 hours of symptom onset, there was no overall difference between the rtPA and placebo-treated patients in the proportion of patients with normal or near-normal outcome (mRS
1: 38.5% versus 36.7%, respectively; P=0.52). However, among women treated within 6 hours of symptom onset, those receiving rtPA were significantly more likely than those receiving placebo to have a normal or near-normal outcome; the margin of benefit was
10% (mRS
1: 40.5% versus 30.3%, P<0.001). An unadjusted analysis showed that women were significantly more likely to benefit from rtPA compared with men (P=0.04). The apparent difference in treatment-effect was not because of any difference in the thrombolytic-related symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (7.9% for women versus 7.8% for men, P=0.97).
|
As can be seen in Figure 1, among patients treated with placebo, outcomes among women were considerably worse than men (P=0.03). There was no significant difference in outcomes between men and women among those treated with rtPA (P=0.50).
Using logistic regression to control for age, baseline NIHSS, diabetes, symptom onset to treatment time (OTT), systolic blood pressure, ASPECT score and also controlling for the effects of OTT on treatment and the effects of SBP on treatment, as well as an interaction term between diabetes and OTT, did not substantially alter the significance of the interaction between sex and rtPA treatment (P=0.04). Figure 2 demonstrates the effect of rtPA in men and women over time, measured by the odds of having a mRS
1, controlling for the same covariates. There was no significant sex-byOTT interaction, nor was there a significant sex-by-treatment-byOTT interaction, indicating that the influence of sex on treatment was consistent across time.
|
The influence of sex on treatment-effect did not reach statistical significance in any of the individual trials and there was no significant heterogeneity across trials in the sex-by-treatment interaction. When generalized estimating equations were used to test whether a similar interaction was observed when the global outcome was used, the trend was similar but not as extreme as with the modified Rankin outcome (P=0.09).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is interesting to note that there is no appreciable effect of gender on outcome in rtPAtreated patients. Among placebo-treated patients, however, the outcome in women was significantly worse than men. These results are consistent with several prior reports demonstrating that women with stroke generally have worse functional outcomes than men (ie, in the absence of thrombolytics).1922 Our results indicate that rtPA may nullify this gender difference in stroke outcomes.
There are several possible explanations for the relationship between sex and rtPA response, including chance. In our analyses and the analyses of others on similar databases,7,11,23 several clinical variables were examined for treatment-effect interactions; multiple post hoc analyses increase the likelihood of reporting a chance interaction. However, the effect appears to be large enough so as to be clinically significant. Further, there have been multiple reports demonstrating sex-based differences in functional outcome in stroke,1922 and there may be plausible mechanisms that might explain the association of gender with treatment benefit. Although the mechanisms are not currently clear, factors associated with sex might affect either (1) the likelihood of reperfusion or (2) the response of the brain to ischemia and reperfusion.
Regarding the first of these mechanisms, sex-based differences in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been described in patients with acute stroke. For example, at least 2 reports have found significantly higher levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in females with acute stroke compared with males.4,5 However, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels have been shown to correlate inversely with the likelihood of reperfusion in stroke,24 which would seem to bias against the sex-effect seen in our study.
Regarding the second potential mechanism, estrogen has been shown to be a potent neuroprotective agent in animal models.25,26 Because the great majority of women in our study were postmenopausal, the direct effect of estrogen is an unlikely explanation, unless there are yet-to-be-discribed longer-lasting "preconditioning" or organizational effects of hormones.
Sex may also play a role in the vascular anatomy of stroke (distal versus proximal) or in stroke subtype (eg, women may have a higher rate of cardioembolic strokes and men a higher rate of atheroembolic and lacunar strokes).27 However, in our study, there was no difference across sex in stroke severity, in the extent or location of hypoattenuation on baseline computed tomography scan (except for a small excess involvement of insular cortex of marginal statistical significance) or in the rate of atrial fibrillation or other heart disease. One can still speculate that sex-based differences in cerebrovascular anatomy may cause differences in collateral flow, preserving threatened ischemic tissue longer in women than men, or that the generally smaller vessels in women may correspond to a smaller clot burden, more vulnerable to lysis.
The possible role of sex on the treatment-effect of rtPA is potentially important in the context of other gender-based differences in acute stroke. One report has shown that women are more likely than men to present with nontraditional stroke symptoms (such as pain or altered level of consciousness),28 and another has demonstrated a trend suggesting women are less likely than men to receive IV thrombolytic therapy.29 In this regard, it is interesting that women appeared to be somewhat underrepresented in these trials, despite the fact that the overall lifetime risk of stroke is higher in women.30,31 Such a gender-based treatment-bias may result in the (reverse) targeting of treatment to patients who are actually less likely to benefit from therapy (ie, men). Our results suggest that female gender may be an important clinical marker for patients who may be more likely to benefit from rtPA, especially at later times when the risks and benefits are more evenly balanced.
Received August 18, 2004; revision received September 15, 2004; accepted September 20, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Reid, D. Dai, G. J. Gubitz, M. K. Kapral, C. Christian, and S. J. Phillips Gender Differences in Stroke Examined in a 10-Year Cohort of Patients Admitted to a Canadian Teaching Hospital Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1090 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saposnik, A. Baibergenova, M. O'Donnell, M. D. Hill, M. K. Kapral, V. Hachinski, and On behalf of the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (S Hospital volume and stroke outcome: Does it matter? Neurology, September 11, 2007; 69(11): 1142 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Saver Hemorrhage After Thrombolytic Therapy for Stroke: The Clinically Relevant Number Needed to Harm Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): 2279 - 2283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A Ringleb, C. Schwark, M Kohrmann, S Kulkens, E Juttler, W Hacke, and P D Schellinger Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in octogenarians: selection by magnetic resonance imaging improves safety but does not improve outcome J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 690 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foerch, B. Misselwitz, M. Humpich, H. Steinmetz, T. Neumann-Haefelin, M. Sitzer, and for the Arbeitsgruppe Schlaganfall Hessen Sex Disparity in the Access of Elderly Patients to Acute Stroke Care Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2123 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rundek Do Women Have Worse Outcome After Stroke Caused by Intracranial Arterial Stenosis? Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2025 - 2027. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arnold, L. Kappeler, K. Nedeltchev, C. Brekenfeld, U. Fischer, B. Keserue, L. Remonda, G. Schroth, and H. P. Mattle Recanalization and Outcome After Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Middle Cerebral Artery and Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Does Sex Matter? Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1281 - 1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.S.V. Elkind, S. Prabhakaran, J. Pittman, W. Koroshetz, M. Jacoby, K. C. Johnston, and for the GAIN Americas Investigators Sex as a predictor of outcomes in patients treated with thrombolysis for acute stroke Neurology, March 13, 2007; 68(11): 842 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Benchenane, H. Castel, M. Boulouard, R. Bluthe, M. Fernandez-Monreal, B. D. Roussel, J. P. Lopez-Atalaya, S. Butt-Gueulle, V. Agin, E. Maubert, et al. Anti-NR1 N-terminal-domain vaccination unmasks the crucial action of tPA on NMDA-receptor-mediated toxicity and spatial memory J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2007; 120(4): 578 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kent, H. P. Selker, R. Ruthazer, E. Bluhmki, and W. Hacke Can Multivariable Risk-Benefit Profiling Be Used to Select Treatment-Favorable Patients for Thrombolysis in Stroke in the 3- to 6-Hour Time Window? Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2963 - 2969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nedeltchev, U. Fischer, M. Arnold, P. Ballinari, T. Haefeli, L. Kappeler, C. Brekenfeld, L. Remonda, G. Schroth, and H. P. Mattle Long-Term Effect of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 3002 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Reid, G. J. Gubitz, S. J. Phillips, M. J. Reeves, Y. Deng, and J. Gargano IV tissue plasminogen activator use in acute stroke: experience from a statewide registry. Neurology, November 14, 2006; 67(9): 1724 - 1725. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.D. Hill, A.M. Demchuk, T.A. Tomsick, Y.Y. Palesch, J.P. Broderick, and on behalf of the IMS-1 Investigators Using the Baseline CT Scan to Select Acute Stroke Patients for IV-IA Therapy. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1612 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Hill, D. M. Kent, J. Hinchey, H. Rowley, A. M. Buchan, L. R. Wechsler, R. T. Higashida, N. J. Fischbein, W. P. Dillon, M. Gent, et al. Sex-Based Differences in the Effect of Intra-Arterial Treatment of Stroke: Analysis of the PROACT-2 Study Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2322 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sandercock and S. Lewis Sex-Based Differences in the Effect of Intra-Arterial Treatment of Stroke: A Plea to Stop Torturing the Old Data and Do Large Trials! Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2198 - 2198. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Legge, G. Saposnik, Y. Nilanont, and V. Hachinski Neglecting the Difference: Does Right or Left Matter in Stroke Outcome After Thrombolysis? Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2066 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Shah, D. S. Liebeskind, J. L. Saver, S. Starkman, F. Vinuela, G. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, D. Kim, N. Sanossian, P. Vespa, et al. Influence of gender on outcomes after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke Neurology, June 13, 2006; 66(11): 1745 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stramba-Badiale, K. M. Fox, S. G. Priori, P. Collins, C. Daly, I. Graham, B. Jonsson, K. Schenck-Gustafsson, and M. Tendera Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 994 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kent, M. D. Hill, S. I. Savitz, and M. Selim Gender Differences in tPA-Related Arterial Recanalization * Response: Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2529 - 2530. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saposnik, S. Di Legge, F. Webster, and V. Hachinski Predictors of major neurologic improvement after thrombolysis in acute stroke Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1169 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ovbiagele and J. L. Saver The smoking-thrombolysis paradox and acute ischemic stroke Neurology, July 26, 2005; 65(2): 293 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Savitz, G. Schlaug, L. Caplan, and M. Selim Arterial Occlusive Lesions Recanalize More Frequently in Women Than in Men After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration for Acute Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1447 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mann, D. M. Kent, L. L. Price, H. P. Selker, P. Ringleb, and M. D Hill Sex-Based Differences in Response to Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke * Response: Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 929 - 929. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |