Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:2691-2695
Published online before print November 3, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190002.79052.bf
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/12/2691    most recent
01.STR.0000190002.79052.bfv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chillon, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chillon, J.-M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CAPTOPRIL
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors

(Stroke. 2005;36:2691.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Constrictor and Dilator Effects of Angiotensin II on Cerebral Arterioles

Jean-Martin Vincent, MSc; Yiu Wa Kwan, BSc, PhD; Siu Lung Chan, BSc, PhD; Caroline Perrin-Sarrado, D Pharm, PhD; Jeffrey Atkinson, BA, MA, PhD Jean-Marc Chillon, D Pharm, PhD*

From the Laboratoire de Pharmacologie (J.-M.V, S.L.C., C.P.-S., J.A., J.-M.C.), Faculté de Pharmacie de l’Université Henri Poincaré-Nancy I, 5 rue Albert Lebrun, 54000 Nancy, France; and the Department of Pharmacology (Y.W.K.), Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong.

Correspondence to Jeffrey Atkinson, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, l’Université Henri Poincaré-Nancy I, 5 rue Albert Lebrun, 54000 Nancy, France. E-mail Jeffrey.Atkinson{at}pharma.uhp-nancy.fr


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— In light of the equivocal data on the cerebral vasoconstrictor and vasodilator actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) and the potential clinical importance of this, we investigated the effects of Ang II on rat pial arterioles.

Methods— We determined the effect of Ang I (3.10–6 mol/L) in the absence and presence of the converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril (10–5 mol/L) in cerebral arterioles of male Wistar rats (open-skull preparation), and those of Ang II (3.10–12 to 3.10–6 mol/L) in the absence and presence of the Ang II receptor (AT1) antagonist, telmisartan (10–5 mol/L) or the AT2 antagonist, PD123319 (10–5 mol/L). We examined the effect of PD123319 (10–5 mol/L) and the Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channel blocker, tetraethylammonium (10–4 mol/L) on the Ang II responses in the presence of telmisartan (10–5 mol/L).

Results— Ang II-induced dose-dependent constriction with a maximum decrease of –20.1±1.0% at 10–6 mol/L. Captopril significantly decreased Ang I-induced vasoconstriction (–4.0±0.9 versus –21.3±2.5%; n=4). Telmisartan reversed Ang II-induced vasoconstriction (9.5±2.5 versus –20.1±1% at 10–6 mol/L; n=5). PD123319 significantly increased Ang II-induced vasoconstriction (–12.9±0.8 versus –10.2±0.4% at 10–6 mol/L; n=5). PD123319 abolished (–2.6±0.7 versus 9.3±1.1% at 10–6 mol/L; n=5) whereas tetraethylammonium reversed (–12.1±1.6 versus 9.9±1.0% at 10–6 mol/L; n=4) Ang II-induced vasodilatation in the presence of telmisartan.

Conclusion— Angiotensin is converted locally into Ang II; the overall effect of Ang II is vasoconstrictor following stimulation of the AT1 receptor, but a vasodilator response can be evoked following stimulation of the AT2 receptor and activation of BKCa.


Key Words: angiotensin AT1 receptor • angiotensin AT2 receptor • potassium channels, calcium-activated • rat


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Blood pressure can be lowered in hypertensives—and even in elderly hypertensives1—without impairing cerebral blood flow (CBF) or CBF autoregulation.2 Such treatment-induced reversal of the cerebrovascular dysfunction associated with hypertension may have a beneficial effect on brain function.3 Recently, a case has been made for a specific effect of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS).4 An improvement in cerebrovascular autoregulatory dilatation could involve structural effects of blockade of the RAS5,6 or functional effects on vasomotion mediated by RAS activation.

The evidence of a cerebrovascular RAS was shown by applying renin on the surface of rabbit pial arterioles. This produced dilatation which was blocked by the angiotensin (Ang) I–converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril.7

However, the effects of RAS on cerebral vasomotion are unclear. Using specific AT1 and AT2 antagonists, it was reported that Ang II induces contraction of the rat anterior cerebral artery via AT1 receptors.8 Other reports suggested that AT2 receptors were involved in dilatation. Several studies show that Ang II dilates small diameter microvessels such as the mesenteric9 and cerebral.10 Such Ang II-induced dilatation may involve endothelial factors such as prostaglandins10 or nitric oxide.11 Other reports, however, suggest that Ang II-induced vasodilatation occurs independently of any action on the endothelium and involves a direct smooth muscle cell dilatory action via calcium-activated potassium channels (BKCa).9 Furthermore, the receptor involved is open to question. Noting that the number of cerebral AT2 receptors and the degree of angiotensin-induced dilatation decreased with age, it was inferred that stimulation of the AT2 receptor is linked to dilatation.12 However, Haberl et al suggested that both AT1 and AT2 receptors are involved in Ang II-induced dilatation,13 whereas Feterik et al suggested that neither receptor subtype is involved.11

With the above in mind, we undertook a series of experiments on the effects of the RAS on pial arteriolar vasomotion in the rat. Using Ang I and the ACE inhibitor captopril, we showed that Ang I is globally vasoconstrictor via its conversion into Ang II, and that Ang II vasoconstricts via an AT1 receptor. When the latter is blocked vasodilatation occurs via an AT2 receptor. This vasodilator response may be direct and endothelium-independent because it is blocked by the BKCa channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA).14


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals and Operative Procedures
Experiments were performed on 3 to 4 month-old male Wistar rats (Iffa-Credo, l’Arbresle, France; body weight: 415±8; n=32), housed at 24°C, exposed to 12 hours of light, and allowed free access to food and fluid. Experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the French Ministry of Agriculture (Paris, France; permits 54 to 4 and 03575).

Animals were fitted with arterial and venous cannula under pentobarbital anesthesia as previously described.15

Measurement of Arteriolar Diameter
We measured the internal diameter of first-order cerebral arterioles through an open-skull preparation as previously described.15

Arteriolar diameter was monitored through a microscope (Stemi 200-C; Carl Zeiss Jena GMBH) connected to a video system with a final magnification of 400x. Images were digitized using a video frame grabber and diameter measured (Saisam; Microvision Instruments).

Experimental Protocols
A cumulative concentration-response curve was obtained (n=7) for Ang II (10–12 to 3.10–6 mol/L). We examined if Ang I (3.10–6 mol/L) induced vasoconstriction following conversion to Ang II by using the converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril (N-[(S)-3-mercapto-2-methylpropionyl-L-proline],10–5 mol/L11; n=4).

We then explored the mechanisms by which Ang II induced vasoconstriction in cerebral arterioles. We examined the effects of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (4'-[(1,4'-dimethyl-2'-propyl[2,6'-bi-1H-benzimidazol]-1'-yl)methyl]-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid, 10–5 mol/L16), on arteriolar vasoconstriction induced by Ang II (n=5).

As Ang II induced vasodilatation in the presence of telmisartan (see Results), we determined the mechanisms of such Ang II-induced vasodilatation using the angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (S-(+)-1-[(4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl)methyl]-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ditrifluoroacetate, 10–5 mol/L11), in the presence of telmisartan (n=5). We also examined the effect of PD123319 on the vasoconstriction induced by Ang II (n=5).

Because vasodilatation induced by stimulation of angiotensin AT2 receptors may be mediated by activation of BKCa channels,9 we examined effects of the BKCa channel blocker TEA (10–4 mol/L)15 on arteriolar vasodilatation induced by Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (n=5). As Ang II induced vasoconstriction in the presence of telmisartan and TEA, we repeated the experiments in presence of telmisartan and TEA plus PD123319 (10–5 mol/L; n=4).

In order to determine whether the effects of the various antagonists were specific to Ang II, experiments were also performed with an equipotent dose of another vasoconstrictor, 5HT (10–9 and 10–6 mol/L).

Given the complexity of the experimental designs, issues of reversibility and tachyphyllaxis were dealt with in preliminary experiments. Repeated stimulation (every 10 minutes) with Ang II (10–6 mol/L; n=4) showed no decrease in the response (1st stimulation –10.8±1.1%, 5th stimulation –13.0±1.9%; P>0.05); similar results were obtained with serotonin (10–6 mol/L; n=4; 1st stimulation –17.2±1.8%, 5th stimulation –15.2±1.7%; P>0.05). Likewise, serotonin (10–6 mol/L; n=4) produced similar vasoconstriction before (–15,2±0.7%) and after (–14.3±3.1%) Ang II (10–6 mol/L).

Because it was previously reported that Ang II can produce endothelium-dependent dilatation of cerebral arterioles17,18 and that pentobarbital may attenuate endothelium-dependent relaxation,19,20 in control experiments we showed that cerebral arterioles were capable of endothelium-dependent relaxation. Adenosine diphosphate, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator,21 induced dose-dependent relaxation of cerebral arterioles (11.4±2.7 and 16.8±2.1% at 10–5 and 10–4 respectively; P<0.05). Furthermore, L-nitro arginine methyl ester induced a small nonsignificant dose-dependent contraction of cerebral arterioles (–0.5±2.3 and –3.2±1.6% at 10–8 and 10–7 respectively).

Substances Used
Ang II, serotonin, captopril, PD123319, L-nitro arginine methyl ester, and adenosine diphosphate were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company. Telmisartan was provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG. Sodium pentobarbital was purchased from Sanofi Santé Animale. KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, urea, and glucose were purchased from Merck KGaA.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means±SE. mean. The experimental protocol was designed to use a paired t-test. The probability level chosen was P≤0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ang II induced dose-dependent constriction of cerebral arterioles with a maximum of –9.8±0.3 µm at 3.10–6 mol/L (Figure 1). Ang I-induced vasoconstriction was significantly attenuated by captopril, which had no significant effect on baseline diameter (45±3 before versus 46±3 µm after) or on Ang II- or 5HT-induced vasoconstriction (Figure 1).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cumulative concentration-response curve for arteriolar vasoconstriction evoked by Ang II (left; n=7), and effects of the ACE, captopril (10–5 mol/L, solid bar), on vasoconstriction induced by Ang I, Ang II and 5HT (right; n=4). Results are expressed as % fall in diameter. Values are means±SE. *P≤0.05 vs baseline; {dagger}P≤0.05 vs responses induced by Ang I.

Telmisartan (10–5 mol/L) had no effect on baseline diameter (41±2 µm before and after; n=13) but reversed the effects of Ang II with an increase in internal diameter to a maximum of 4.7±0.6 µm at 10–6 mol/L (Figure 2). PD123319 (10–5 mol/L) had no significant effect on baseline diameter (58±3 before versus 61±3 µm after; n=5) but abolished vasodilatation after Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (Figure 3). PD123319 (10–5 mol/L) significantly increased constriction induced by Ang II but had no effect on vasoconstriction induced by 5HT when perfused alone or in presence of telmisartan (Figure 3).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cumulative concentration-response curve for the arteriolar vasomotor response to Ang II in presence of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (10–5 mol/L). Results are expressed as % change in diameter. Values are means±SE; n=5. *P≤0.05 vs baseline; {dagger}P≤0.05 vs responses induced by Ang II alone (see Figure 1, left).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of the angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (10–5 mol/L, full bars) on responses induced by Ang II and 5HT when perfused alone (left; n=5) or in the presence of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (10–5 mol/L; right; n=5). Open bars show responses obtained before and cross-hatched bars following wash-out of PD123319. Results are expressed as % fall in diameter. Values are means±SE. *P≤0.05 vs baseline; {dagger}P≤0.05 vs responses induced by Ang II or 5HT.

The BKCa channel blocker TEA (10–4 mol/L) reversed the vasodilatation observed with Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (Figure 4). TEA had no effect on 5HT-induced vasoconstriction (Figure 4). PD123319 significantly decreased vasoconstriction produced by Ang II in the presence of telmisartan plus TEA (Figure 4).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of the BKCa channel blocker, TEA (10–4 mol/L, full bars) on responses induced by Ang II and 5HT in the presence of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (10–5 mol/L; left; n=5) or in the presence of both the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (10–5 mol/L) and the angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (10–5 mol/L; n=4). Open bars show responses obtained before and cross-hatched bars following wash-out of TEA for the left panel. Open bars show responses obtained before and cross-hatched bars responses obtained in presence of TEA plus PD123319 TEA for the left panel. Results are expressed as % fall in diameter. Values are means±SE. *P≤0.05 vs baseline; {dagger}P≤0.05 vs responses induced by Ang II or 5HT. $P≤0.05 vs responses induced by Ang II in the presence of TEA.

Ang I, Ang II, 5HT, captopril, telmisartan, PD123319 and TEA, when perfused in the cranial window, had no significant effect on systemic hemodynamics or blood gas parameters (results not shown), which were stable over the duration of the experiment (results not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study shows that Ang I in vivo is transformed into Ang II, which binds to AT1 receptors, producing arteriolar constriction. When AT1 receptors are blocked with telmisartan, Ang II dilates arterioles by binding to AT2 receptors and the subsequent opening of BKCa channels.

Our findings indicate that Ang II is globally vasoconstrictor principally via an AT1 receptor. This is in agreement with other studies using rat brain vessels (eg, the middle cerebral artery)22 but not with authors cited in the introduction and others who reported a globally vasodilator response17,18 or no effect of Ang II on baseline arteriolar diameter.23 Ang II dilated rat arterioles via an AT2 receptor when AT1 receptors were blocked, thus AT2 receptors linked to vasodilatation exist in rat pial arterioles. This is further suggested by the fact that the AT2 antagonist, PD123319, potentiates Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. Thus, the two receptors exist in rat pial arterioles and AT1-associated vasoconstriction predominates. In other segments of the cerebrovascular network, in other species, the two receptors may exist but AT2-mediated vasodilatation could predominate. The latter appears to involve smooth muscle cell BKCa channels and not endothelium because TEA reverses Ang II-induced dilatation (in the presence of telmisartan). We cannot exclude the possibility that TEA is acting on other potassium channels or other types of neurohumoral transmission. However, we have shown that TEA inhibits vasodilatation induced by NS1619 (1-(2'-hydroxy-5'-trifluoromethylphenyl)-5-trifluoro-methyl-2(3H)benzimidazolone), a selective activator of BKCa channels.15 It should also be noted that TEA had no effect on responses to 5HT. We also observed that the AT2 receptor blocker, PD123319, reduced Ang II-induced vasoconstriction observed in presence of telmisartan and TEA, suggesting that Ang II induces vasoconstriction, at least partially, by stimulating receptor blocked by PD123319. Such Ang II type 2 receptor–mediated vasoconstriction has already been described in isolated mesenteric resistance arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).24

Captopril blocked the vasoconstrictor action of Ang I suggesting the existence of a physiological cerebrovascular RAS. This action of the ACE inhibitor is paradoxical at first sight because ACE is situated on the endothelial cell surface and Ang I, a large peptide, was applied to the outside of the arteriole. We suppose that conversion of Ang I to Ang II can occur elsewhere than in endothelium as has been recently reported in femoral arteries.25 Many authors have reported vasomotor effects of the angiotensins applied to the outside of arterioles (see Introduction). Although we and others7 have provided evidence for the existence of a cerebrovascular RAS, captopril alone did not modify pial arteriolar diameter in spite of the presumably activated state of the RAS after pentobarbital anesthesia.26 The explanation for this may lie in the relative lack of sensibility of rat microvasculature to ACE inhibitors (unless associated with salidiuretic treatment).27 It has previously been reported that degradation products of angiotensin such as the hexapeptide Ang II-(3-8)18 rather than Ang II itself produce arteriolar vasomotor effects. Our experiments neither confirm nor refute this possibility.

Finally, the existence of both AT1 and AT2 receptors in the cerebrovascular network may have important clinical implications. It has been previously reported by Nishimura28 and Ito29 that the AT1 antagonists normalize CBF autoregulation in SHR. Several explanations have been given for this effect. In the light of our data, we propose a new explanation: AT1 blockade will enhance compensatory AT2-mediated vasodilatation. This has been developed further by Fournier and others30 who suggested that drugs which "activate" AT2 receptors (Ang II receptors (AT1) antagonists, calcium channels blockers, diuretics) have a more beneficial effect on stroke than drugs which "inhibit" AT2 receptors (ACE inhibitors, ß blockers), for a given fall in blood pressure. However, this is still questionable because Ang II AT1 blockers and ACE inhibitors are equally effective in reversing cerebral arteriolar remodeling, suggesting that this effect is directly mediated by blockade of AT1 receptors.5 Furthermore, hypertension is a disease of the elderly and expression of AT2 receptors may decrease with age.12

We have recently reported that in an animal model of human essential hypertension (the SHR), there is a parallel increase in systemic pressure and the lower limit of CBF autoregulation, thus maintaining the cerebrovascular security margin.5 When blood pressure is lowered with an AT1 antagonist (telmisartan), the security margin is maintained. However for a similar blood pressure fall with an ACE inhibitor (ramipril) the security margin is reduced.5,31 This may be linked to compensatory activation of AT2 receptor–mediated vasodilatation after specific AT1 receptor blockade.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was funded by the French Ministry of Education and Research, the Lorraine Regional Development Committee, the Greater Nancy Urban Council, the Nancy Henri Poincaré University, the Fondation de France, and the Nancy Pharmacolor Association.


*    Footnotes
 
*Present address is Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, INSERM ERI-12, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, 3 rue des Louvels, 80035 Amiens, France. Back

Received June 30, 2005; accepted September 6, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Lipsitz LA, Gagnon M, Vyas M, Iloputaife I, Kiely DK, Sorond F, Serrador J, Cheng DM, Babikian V, Cupples LA. Antihypertensive therapy increases cerebral blood flow and carotid distensibility in hypertensive elderly subjects. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 216–221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ram CV, Meese R, Kaplan NM, Devous MD, Bonte FJ, Forland SC, Cutler RE. Antihypertensive therapy in the elderly. Effects on blood pressure and cerebral blood flow. Am J Med. 1987; 82: 53–57.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, Thijs L, Babarskiene MR, Babeanu S, Bossini A, Fagard R, Gil-Extremera B, Laks T, Kobalava Z, Sarti C, Tuomilehto J, Vanhanen H, Webster J, Yodfat Y, Birkenhager WH. The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: new evidence from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) study. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 162: 2046–2052.
  4. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, Woodward M, Neal B, MacMahon S, Chalmers J. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 1069–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dupuis F, Atkinson J, Liminana P, Chillon JM. Comparative effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, telmisartan, and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cerebrovascular structure in SHR. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 1061–1066.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Dupuis F, Atkinson J, Liminana P, Chillon JM. Captopril improves cerebrovascular structure and function in old hypertensive rats. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2005; 144: 349–356.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Haberl RL, Decker-Hermann PJ, Hermann K. Effect of renin on brain arterioles and cerebral blood flow in rabbits. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1996; 16: 714–719.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Naveri L, Stromberg C, Saavedra JM. Angiotensin II AT1 receptor mediated contraction of the perfused rat cerebral artery. NeuroReport. 1994; 5: 2278–2280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dimitropoulou C, White RE, Fuchs L, Zhang H, Catravas JD, Carrier GO. Angiotensin II relaxes microvessels via the AT2 receptor and Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channels. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 301–307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Meng W, Busija DW. Comparative effects of angiotensin-(1–7) and angiotensin II on piglet pial arterioles. Stroke. 1993; 24: 2041–2044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Feterik K, Smith L, Katusic ZS. Angiotensin-(1–7) causes endothelium-dependent relaxation in canine middle cerebral artery. Brain Research. 2000; 873: 75–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Tsutsumi K, Saavedra JM. Characterization of AT2 angiotensin II receptors in rat anterior cerebral arteries. Am Journal of Physiology. 1991; 261: H667–H670.
  13. Haberl RL. Role of angiotensin receptor subtypes in the response of rabbit brain arterioles to angiotensin. Stroke. 1994; 25: 1476–1479.[Abstract]
  14. Brayden JE, Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial tone by activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels. Science. 1992; 256: 532–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Régrigny O, Delagrange P, Scalbert E, Lartaud-Idjouadiene I, Atkinson J, Chillon JM. Effects of melatonin on rat pial arteriolar diameter in vivo. British Journal of Pharmacology. 1999; 127: 1666–1670.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Schupp M, Janke J, Clasen R, Unger T, Kintscher U. Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activity. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2054–2057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Haberl RL, Anneser F, Villringer A, Einhaupl KM. Angiotensin II induces endothelium-dependent vasodilation of rat cerebral arterioles. Am Journal of Physiology. 1990; 258: H1840–H1846.
  18. Haberl RL, Decker PJ, Einhaupl KM. Angiotensin degradation products mediate endothelium-dependent dilation of rabbit brain arterioles. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1621–1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rinaldi GJ. Influence of several methodological procedures utilized to obtain in vitro vascular preparations on endothelial activity. Endothelium. 2001; 8: 235–242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. de Wit C, Esser N, Lehr HA, Bolz SS, Pohl U. Pentobarbital-sensitive EDHF comediates ACh-induced arteriolar dilation in the hamster microcirculation. Am Journal of Physiology. 1999; 276: H1527–H1534.
  21. Ryan MJ, Didion SP, Davis DR, Faraci FM, Sigmund CD. Endothelial dysfunction and blood pressure variability in selected inbred mouse strains. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 42–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Stenman E, Edvinsson L. Cerebral ischemia enhances vascular angiotensin AT1 receptor-mediated contraction in rats. Stroke. 2004; 35: 970–974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Didion SP, Faraci FM. Angiotensin II produces superoxide-mediated impairment of endothelial function in cerebral arterioles. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2038–2042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. You D, Loufrani L, Baron C, Levy BI, Widdop RE, Henrion D. High blood pressure reduction reverses angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated vasoconstriction into vasodilation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1006–1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Schuijt MP, de Vries R, Saxena PR, Schalekamp MA, Danser AH. Vasoconstriction is determined by interstitial rather than circulating angiotensin II. Br J Pharmacol. 2002; 135: 275–283.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Essadki A, Atkinson J. Renin release by renin-depleted rats following hypotensive haemorrhage and anesthetics. Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology. 1981; 392: 46–50.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Chillon JM, Capdeville-Atkinson C, Lartaud I, Guillou J, Mertès PM, Atkinson J. Chronic antihypertensive treatment with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide improves aortic distensibility in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1992; 107: 710–714.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Nishimura Y, Ito T, Saavedra JM. Angiotensin II AT1 blockade normalizes cerebrovascular autoregulation and reduces cerebral ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2478–2486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ito T, Yamakawa H, Bregonzio C, Terron JA, Falcon-Neri A, Saavedra JM. Protection against ischemia and improvement of cerebral blood flow in genetically hypertensive rats by chronic pretreatment with an angiotensin II AT1 antagonist. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2297–2303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Fournier A, Messerli FH, Achard JM, Fernandez L. Cerebroprotection mediated by angiotensin II: a hypothesis supported by recent randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1343–1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lartaud I, Makki T, Bray-des Boscs L, Niederhoffer N, Atkinson J, Corman B, Capdeville-Atkinson C. Effect of chronic ANG I-converting enzyme inhibition on aging processes. IV. Cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: R687–R694.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Zhang, S. Witkowski, Q. Fu, J. A.H.R. Claassen, and B. D. Levine
Cerebral Hemodynamics After Short- and Long-Term Reduction in Blood Pressure in Mild and Moderate Hypertension
Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1149 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/12/2691    most recent
01.STR.0000190002.79052.bfv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chillon, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Chillon, J.-M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CAPTOPRIL
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors