| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:2691.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Laboratoire de Pharmacologie (J.-M.V, S.L.C., C.P.-S., J.A., J.-M.C.), Faculté de Pharmacie de lUniversité Henri Poincaré-Nancy I, 5 rue Albert Lebrun, 54000 Nancy, France; and the Department of Pharmacology (Y.W.K.), Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong.
Correspondence to Jeffrey Atkinson, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, lUniversité Henri Poincaré-Nancy I, 5 rue Albert Lebrun, 54000 Nancy, France. E-mail Jeffrey.Atkinson{at}pharma.uhp-nancy.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We determined the effect of Ang I (3.106 mol/L) in the absence and presence of the converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril (105 mol/L) in cerebral arterioles of male Wistar rats (open-skull preparation), and those of Ang II (3.1012 to 3.106 mol/L) in the absence and presence of the Ang II receptor (AT1) antagonist, telmisartan (105 mol/L) or the AT2 antagonist, PD123319 (105 mol/L). We examined the effect of PD123319 (105 mol/L) and the Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channel blocker, tetraethylammonium (104 mol/L) on the Ang II responses in the presence of telmisartan (105 mol/L).
Results Ang II-induced dose-dependent constriction with a maximum decrease of 20.1±1.0% at 106 mol/L. Captopril significantly decreased Ang I-induced vasoconstriction (4.0±0.9 versus 21.3±2.5%; n=4). Telmisartan reversed Ang II-induced vasoconstriction (9.5±2.5 versus 20.1±1% at 106 mol/L; n=5). PD123319 significantly increased Ang II-induced vasoconstriction (12.9±0.8 versus 10.2±0.4% at 106 mol/L; n=5). PD123319 abolished (2.6±0.7 versus 9.3±1.1% at 106 mol/L; n=5) whereas tetraethylammonium reversed (12.1±1.6 versus 9.9±1.0% at 106 mol/L; n=4) Ang II-induced vasodilatation in the presence of telmisartan.
Conclusion Angiotensin is converted locally into Ang II; the overall effect of Ang II is vasoconstrictor following stimulation of the AT1 receptor, but a vasodilator response can be evoked following stimulation of the AT2 receptor and activation of BKCa.
Key Words: angiotensin AT1 receptor angiotensin AT2 receptor potassium channels, calcium-activated rat
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The evidence of a cerebrovascular RAS was shown by applying renin on the surface of rabbit pial arterioles. This produced dilatation which was blocked by the angiotensin (Ang) Iconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril.7
However, the effects of RAS on cerebral vasomotion are unclear. Using specific AT1 and AT2 antagonists, it was reported that Ang II induces contraction of the rat anterior cerebral artery via AT1 receptors.8 Other reports suggested that AT2 receptors were involved in dilatation. Several studies show that Ang II dilates small diameter microvessels such as the mesenteric9 and cerebral.10 Such Ang II-induced dilatation may involve endothelial factors such as prostaglandins10 or nitric oxide.11 Other reports, however, suggest that Ang II-induced vasodilatation occurs independently of any action on the endothelium and involves a direct smooth muscle cell dilatory action via calcium-activated potassium channels (BKCa).9 Furthermore, the receptor involved is open to question. Noting that the number of cerebral AT2 receptors and the degree of angiotensin-induced dilatation decreased with age, it was inferred that stimulation of the AT2 receptor is linked to dilatation.12 However, Haberl et al suggested that both AT1 and AT2 receptors are involved in Ang II-induced dilatation,13 whereas Feterik et al suggested that neither receptor subtype is involved.11
With the above in mind, we undertook a series of experiments on the effects of the RAS on pial arteriolar vasomotion in the rat. Using Ang I and the ACE inhibitor captopril, we showed that Ang I is globally vasoconstrictor via its conversion into Ang II, and that Ang II vasoconstricts via an AT1 receptor. When the latter is blocked vasodilatation occurs via an AT2 receptor. This vasodilator response may be direct and endothelium-independent because it is blocked by the BKCa channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA).14
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals were fitted with arterial and venous cannula under pentobarbital anesthesia as previously described.15
Measurement of Arteriolar Diameter
We measured the internal diameter of first-order cerebral arterioles through an open-skull preparation as previously described.15
Arteriolar diameter was monitored through a microscope (Stemi 200-C; Carl Zeiss Jena GMBH) connected to a video system with a final magnification of 400x. Images were digitized using a video frame grabber and diameter measured (Saisam; Microvision Instruments).
Experimental Protocols
A cumulative concentration-response curve was obtained (n=7) for Ang II (1012 to 3.106 mol/L). We examined if Ang I (3.106 mol/L) induced vasoconstriction following conversion to Ang II by using the converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril (N-[(S)-3-mercapto-2-methylpropionyl-L-proline],105 mol/L11; n=4).
We then explored the mechanisms by which Ang II induced vasoconstriction in cerebral arterioles. We examined the effects of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, telmisartan (4'-[(1,4'-dimethyl-2'-propyl[2,6'-bi-1H-benzimidazol]-1'-yl)methyl]-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid, 105 mol/L16), on arteriolar vasoconstriction induced by Ang II (n=5).
As Ang II induced vasodilatation in the presence of telmisartan (see Results), we determined the mechanisms of such Ang II-induced vasodilatation using the angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (S-(+)-1-[(4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl)methyl]-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ditrifluoroacetate, 105 mol/L11), in the presence of telmisartan (n=5). We also examined the effect of PD123319 on the vasoconstriction induced by Ang II (n=5).
Because vasodilatation induced by stimulation of angiotensin AT2 receptors may be mediated by activation of BKCa channels,9 we examined effects of the BKCa channel blocker TEA (104 mol/L)15 on arteriolar vasodilatation induced by Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (n=5). As Ang II induced vasoconstriction in the presence of telmisartan and TEA, we repeated the experiments in presence of telmisartan and TEA plus PD123319 (105 mol/L; n=4).
In order to determine whether the effects of the various antagonists were specific to Ang II, experiments were also performed with an equipotent dose of another vasoconstrictor, 5HT (109 and 106 mol/L).
Given the complexity of the experimental designs, issues of reversibility and tachyphyllaxis were dealt with in preliminary experiments. Repeated stimulation (every 10 minutes) with Ang II (106 mol/L; n=4) showed no decrease in the response (1st stimulation 10.8±1.1%, 5th stimulation 13.0±1.9%; P>0.05); similar results were obtained with serotonin (106 mol/L; n=4; 1st stimulation 17.2±1.8%, 5th stimulation 15.2±1.7%; P>0.05). Likewise, serotonin (106 mol/L; n=4) produced similar vasoconstriction before (15,2±0.7%) and after (14.3±3.1%) Ang II (106 mol/L).
Because it was previously reported that Ang II can produce endothelium-dependent dilatation of cerebral arterioles17,18 and that pentobarbital may attenuate endothelium-dependent relaxation,19,20 in control experiments we showed that cerebral arterioles were capable of endothelium-dependent relaxation. Adenosine diphosphate, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator,21 induced dose-dependent relaxation of cerebral arterioles (11.4±2.7 and 16.8±2.1% at 105 and 104 respectively; P<0.05). Furthermore, L-nitro arginine methyl ester induced a small nonsignificant dose-dependent contraction of cerebral arterioles (0.5±2.3 and 3.2±1.6% at 108 and 107 respectively).
Substances Used
Ang II, serotonin, captopril, PD123319, L-nitro arginine methyl ester, and adenosine diphosphate were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company. Telmisartan was provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG. Sodium pentobarbital was purchased from Sanofi Santé Animale. KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, urea, and glucose were purchased from Merck KGaA.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means±SE. mean. The experimental protocol was designed to use a paired t-test. The probability level chosen was P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Telmisartan (105 mol/L) had no effect on baseline diameter (41±2 µm before and after; n=13) but reversed the effects of Ang II with an increase in internal diameter to a maximum of 4.7±0.6 µm at 106 mol/L (Figure 2). PD123319 (105 mol/L) had no significant effect on baseline diameter (58±3 before versus 61±3 µm after; n=5) but abolished vasodilatation after Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (Figure 3). PD123319 (105 mol/L) significantly increased constriction induced by Ang II but had no effect on vasoconstriction induced by 5HT when perfused alone or in presence of telmisartan (Figure 3).
|
|
The BKCa channel blocker TEA (104 mol/L) reversed the vasodilatation observed with Ang II in the presence of telmisartan (Figure 4). TEA had no effect on 5HT-induced vasoconstriction (Figure 4). PD123319 significantly decreased vasoconstriction produced by Ang II in the presence of telmisartan plus TEA (Figure 4).
|
Ang I, Ang II, 5HT, captopril, telmisartan, PD123319 and TEA, when perfused in the cranial window, had no significant effect on systemic hemodynamics or blood gas parameters (results not shown), which were stable over the duration of the experiment (results not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings indicate that Ang II is globally vasoconstrictor principally via an AT1 receptor. This is in agreement with other studies using rat brain vessels (eg, the middle cerebral artery)22 but not with authors cited in the introduction and others who reported a globally vasodilator response17,18 or no effect of Ang II on baseline arteriolar diameter.23 Ang II dilated rat arterioles via an AT2 receptor when AT1 receptors were blocked, thus AT2 receptors linked to vasodilatation exist in rat pial arterioles. This is further suggested by the fact that the AT2 antagonist, PD123319, potentiates Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. Thus, the two receptors exist in rat pial arterioles and AT1-associated vasoconstriction predominates. In other segments of the cerebrovascular network, in other species, the two receptors may exist but AT2-mediated vasodilatation could predominate. The latter appears to involve smooth muscle cell BKCa channels and not endothelium because TEA reverses Ang II-induced dilatation (in the presence of telmisartan). We cannot exclude the possibility that TEA is acting on other potassium channels or other types of neurohumoral transmission. However, we have shown that TEA inhibits vasodilatation induced by NS1619 (1-(2'-hydroxy-5'-trifluoromethylphenyl)-5-trifluoro-methyl-2(3H)benzimidazolone), a selective activator of BKCa channels.15 It should also be noted that TEA had no effect on responses to 5HT. We also observed that the AT2 receptor blocker, PD123319, reduced Ang II-induced vasoconstriction observed in presence of telmisartan and TEA, suggesting that Ang II induces vasoconstriction, at least partially, by stimulating receptor blocked by PD123319. Such Ang II type 2 receptormediated vasoconstriction has already been described in isolated mesenteric resistance arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).24
Captopril blocked the vasoconstrictor action of Ang I suggesting the existence of a physiological cerebrovascular RAS. This action of the ACE inhibitor is paradoxical at first sight because ACE is situated on the endothelial cell surface and Ang I, a large peptide, was applied to the outside of the arteriole. We suppose that conversion of Ang I to Ang II can occur elsewhere than in endothelium as has been recently reported in femoral arteries.25 Many authors have reported vasomotor effects of the angiotensins applied to the outside of arterioles (see Introduction). Although we and others7 have provided evidence for the existence of a cerebrovascular RAS, captopril alone did not modify pial arteriolar diameter in spite of the presumably activated state of the RAS after pentobarbital anesthesia.26 The explanation for this may lie in the relative lack of sensibility of rat microvasculature to ACE inhibitors (unless associated with salidiuretic treatment).27 It has previously been reported that degradation products of angiotensin such as the hexapeptide Ang II-(3-8)18 rather than Ang II itself produce arteriolar vasomotor effects. Our experiments neither confirm nor refute this possibility.
Finally, the existence of both AT1 and AT2 receptors in the cerebrovascular network may have important clinical implications. It has been previously reported by Nishimura28 and Ito29 that the AT1 antagonists normalize CBF autoregulation in SHR. Several explanations have been given for this effect. In the light of our data, we propose a new explanation: AT1 blockade will enhance compensatory AT2-mediated vasodilatation. This has been developed further by Fournier and others30 who suggested that drugs which "activate" AT2 receptors (Ang II receptors (AT1) antagonists, calcium channels blockers, diuretics) have a more beneficial effect on stroke than drugs which "inhibit" AT2 receptors (ACE inhibitors, ß blockers), for a given fall in blood pressure. However, this is still questionable because Ang II AT1 blockers and ACE inhibitors are equally effective in reversing cerebral arteriolar remodeling, suggesting that this effect is directly mediated by blockade of AT1 receptors.5 Furthermore, hypertension is a disease of the elderly and expression of AT2 receptors may decrease with age.12
We have recently reported that in an animal model of human essential hypertension (the SHR), there is a parallel increase in systemic pressure and the lower limit of CBF autoregulation, thus maintaining the cerebrovascular security margin.5 When blood pressure is lowered with an AT1 antagonist (telmisartan), the security margin is maintained. However for a similar blood pressure fall with an ACE inhibitor (ramipril) the security margin is reduced.5,31 This may be linked to compensatory activation of AT2 receptormediated vasodilatation after specific AT1 receptor blockade.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 30, 2005; accepted September 6, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Zhang, S. Witkowski, Q. Fu, J. A.H.R. Claassen, and B. D. Levine Cerebral Hemodynamics After Short- and Long-Term Reduction in Blood Pressure in Mild and Moderate Hypertension Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1149 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |