| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:2745.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Reports |
From the Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science (E.Y.K., S.-K.L., D.J.K., S.-H.S., J.K., D.I.K.) and the Department of Neurology (J.H.H.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5-mm thickness noncontrast-computed tomography (NCT). The purpose of this study was to compare thin-section NCT with 5-mm NCT in the detection of thrombus in acute ischemic stroke. Methods Enrolled were consecutive 51 patients with acute infarction in the anterior or MCA territory. All patients underwent both 5-mm NCT and either 1.25- or 1-mm thin-section helical NCT within 6 hours of symptom onset. Patients were assigned to either the single or multisegmental occlusion group, depending on the thrombus extent on thin-section NCT. Thin-section NCT and 5-mm NCT were compared in the detection of thrombi.
Results Thrombi were identified in 45 patients (88%) on thin-section NCT and 16 on 5-mm NCT (31%; P<0.001). No occlusion was seen in 6 patients. Both sensitivity and specificity of thin-section NCT in detection of thrombus were 100%.
Conclusions Acute thrombus can be detected with higher sensitivity on thin-section NCT than on 5-mm NCT, and its extent is more accurately determined on thin-section NCT.
Key Words: acute stroke cerebral infarct neuroradiology thrombosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All previous studies on HMCAS were conducted using the conventional
5-mm thickness noncontrast-computed tomography (NCT). We hypothesized that thin-section NCT would allow us to detect more thrombi. The purpose of our study was to compare thin-section NCT with conventional 5-mm NCT in the detection of thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Retrospectively, the occlusion of large arteries, including ICA, M1, M2, A1, and A2 segments, was determined by a neuroradiologist on CTA, including the source images of all patients. Two neuroradiologists who were not involved in determination of thrombus on CTA independently determined the presence of thrombus on both 5-mm and thin-section NCT images in a separate session. They were unaware of the follow-up images and of clinical information. Disagreements were decided by a consensus. Higher attenuation in the artery relative to the contralateral artery or to the adjacent parenchyma was considered a thrombus. Patients were assigned to either the single or multisegmental occlusion group according to thrombus extent on thin-section NCT. Two or more segmental occlusions were considered a multisegmental occlusion. Thrombus detection was compared between thin-section and 5-mm NCT using McNemar test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
=0.912 and 0.873, respectively). Six patients without thrombus on thin-section NCT did not show occlusions on CTA, but they showed infarction in the basal ganglia on the follow-up imaging. Therefore, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of thin-section NCT in detection of thrombi were all 100%. On the other hand, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 5-mm NCT were 36%, 100%, and 43%, respectively.
|
|
Single and multisegmental occlusions on thin-section NCT were seen in 25 and 20 patients, respectively, whereas they were noted on 5-mm NCT in 13 and 3 patients, respectively (P<0.001; Table).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, the extent of thrombus could be more accurately determined on thin-section NCT. Thrombus extent may have therapeutic implications because a larger thrombus causing multisegmental occlusion may require a longer time for thrombolysis than a smaller thrombus, resulting in severe ischemia. In addition, fewer thrombolytic agents may be required for a smaller thrombus. However, further prospective studies using dose modulation of thrombolytics according to thrombus extent should be conducted.
In conclusion, acute thrombus can be detected with higher sensitivity on thin-section NCT than on 5-mm NCT, and its extent is more accurately determined on thin-section NCT.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 12, 2005; accepted August 5, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Leys D, Pruvo JP, Godefroy O, Rondepierre P, Leclerc X. Prevalence and significance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery in acute stroke. Stroke. 1992; 23: 317324.
3. von Kummer R, Meyding-Lamade U, Forsting M, Rosin L, Rieke K, Hacke W, Sartor K. Sensitivity and prognostic value of early CT in occlusion of the middle cerebral artery trunk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15: 915;discussion 1618.
4. Tomsick T, Brott T, Barsan W, Broderick J, Haley EC, Spilker J. Thrombus localization with emergency cerebral CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992; 13: 257263.[Abstract]
5. Manelfe C, Larrue V, von Kummer R, Bozzao L, Ringleb P, Bastianello S, Iweins F, Lesaffre E. Association of hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign with clinical outcome in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 1999; 30: 769772.
6. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, Pexman JH, Hill MD, Buchan AM. Hyperdense Sylvian fissure MCA dot sign: a CT marker of acute ischemia. Stroke. 2001; 32: 8488.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Ozdemir, A. Leung, M. Bussiere, V. Hachinski, and D. Pelz Hyperdense Internal Carotid Artery Sign: A CT Sign of Acute Ischemia Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2011 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Doufekias, A. Z. Segal, and J. R. Kizer Cardiogenic and aortogenic brain embolism. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1049 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.Y. Kim, E. Yoo, H.Y. Choi, J.W. Lee, and J.H. Heo Thrombus Volume Comparison between Patients with and without Hyperattenuated Artery Sign on CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 359 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Y. Kim, J. H. Heo, S-K Lee, D. J. Kim, S-H Suh, J. Kim, and D. I. Kim Prediction of thrombolytic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke using thin-section noncontrast CT Neurology, November 28, 2006; 67(10): 1846 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |