| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:270.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology (T.E., K.S., D.S.), and the Institute of Clinical Chemistry (H.B.), Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Thorleif Etgen, Neurologische Klinik, Technische Universität München, 81675 München, Möhlstraße 28. E-mail etgen{at}neuro.med.tu-muenchen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods In 174 consecutive patients with MRI-confirmed ischemic stroke, serial measurements of cTnT, cTnI, and NT-proBNP were performed at 3 different time points in the hyperacute phase (at admission, on days 1 and 2). Relation of laboratory values to risk factors, stroke subtype classification, and clinical outcome after 3 months was analyzed.
Results The highest proportion of raised parameters was found at day 2 for cTnI in 8 of 103 (7.8%), at day 3 for cTnT in 8 of 174 (4.6%), and NT-proBNP in 114 of 174 (65.5%) patients. Proportion of patients with good outcome was significantly reduced in the group with highest NT-proBNP quartile. However, using multivariate regression analysis, no significant relation to morbidity and mortality was found for cTnT, cTnI, or NT-proBNP. Significant impact on the outcome was detected for lesion size, insular involvement, sex, age, and stroke severity.
Conclusions NT-proBNP is raised in nearly two thirds of acute stroke patients, whereas elevated cardiac troponins are found only in a small number of acute ischemic stroke patients. Neither NT-proBNP nor cardiac troponins influence clinical outcome if other risk factors are considered.
Key Words: natriuretic peptide stroke troponin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of the uncertain value of cardiac troponins and NT-proBNP in acute ischemic stroke, we evaluated the short-term prognostic value of early serial measurement of cTnT, cTnI, and NT-proBNP in the hyperacute phase of ischemic stroke.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Risk Factors
Risk factors determined included the following: arterial hypertension (treatment with antihypertensive medication or documented blood pressure raised >140 mm Hg systolic or >90 mm Hg diastolic at 2 independent readings before admission), diabetes mellitus (treatment with antidiabetic medication or diagnosis of diabetes during hospital stay), hyperlipidemia (treatment with lipid-lowering medication or diagnosis during hospital stay), smoking (duration and amount of smoking), body mass index, prevalent ischemic heart disease (proven by angiography or a documented myocardial infarction), and heart failure (documented New York Heart Association classes IIIV).
Imaging
Imaging was performed on an MRI scanner with 1.5T (Magnetom Symphony; Siemens Medical Systems) and included routinely coronal T1, transversal T2, and transversal and sagittal diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Lesion volume was measured using specific MRI software (Numaris 3.5 VA13C; Siemens Medical Systems).
Blood Samples
Blood samples were collected at 3 different times: first, at the time of admission, within 12 hours after onset of symptoms; second, on the day after admission; and third, 24 hours after the second measurement. Serum cTnT concentration was measured using the Elecsys 2010 immunoassay system (Roche Diagnostics). Upper reference limit for apparently healthy individuals is 0.01 µg/L. The diagnostic cut-off value (10% coefficient of variation) is 0.03 µg/L. Concentrations above this cut-off indicate myocardial damage.20 Serum cTnI concentration was measured using a LIAISON analyzer (Byk-Diasorin). A concentration >0.03 µg/L is considered pathologically increased.21 Serum NT-proBNP concentration was measured using an Elecsys 2010 analyzer. The reference interval is age and sex dependent, but in all situations, a concentration >227 pg/mL in men and >334 pg/mL in women is considered pathologically increased according to manufacturer information.
Diagnostic
All patients underwent intensive diagnostic follow-up, which included standard 12-lead electrocardiography, monitor electrocardiography, 24-hour electrocardiography, echocardiography (usually transthoracically, if indicated transesophageally), neurosonography (extracranial continuous wave and duplex sonography and transcranial sonography), routine laboratory (including creatine kinaseMB), coagulation, and vasculitis screening. If indicated, magnetic resonance angiography or conventional angiography was performed additionally.
Stroke Classification
Etiology of strokes was determined according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Treatment (TOAST) stroke subtype classification, which differs between large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, small-artery occlusion, other etiology, and undetermined etiology.22 Concurrent etiology was defined if a patient had
2 probable etiologies, and it was not possible to determine the causative one.
Statistical Analysis
Nominal or ordinal variables (such as stroke scales) are given as median with 25th and 75th percentiles; continuous variables are given as mean with 95% CI. Multiple regression analysis was performed as follows: nominal variables (sex, insular involvement, heart failure, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, coronary heart disease, hyperlipidemia, cardiac thrombi, left ventricular hypertrophy, and atrial fibrillation) and laboratory values (normal versus pathologically increased) were dichotomized. All variables were first tested one by one against the dependent variable unfavorable outcome (defined either as Barthel index <85 or modified Rankin scale 3 to 6) for the presence of a significant association (P<0.05). Only variables significantly associated with the outcome were assessed in a multivariate model performed separately for each significant laboratory parameter.
2 test assessed significance in 4 table calculations. For all calculations, JMP version 5.0.1. (SAS Institute) was used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Morbidity and Mortality
At admission, the median NIHSS score was 8.0 with an interquartile range (IQR) between 4 and 14. At baseline, the median Barthel index was 40 (IQR, 10 to 75); that increased after 3 months to 100 (IQR, 80 to 100). After 3 months, 19 patients (10.9%) had died. No new cardiovascular events occurred during follow-up. Overall, an unfavorable outcome after 3 months was observed in 58 (33.3%) patients, defined as Barthel index <85, and in 60 patients (34.5%), defined as Rankin scale 3 to 6.
Blood Samples
Serial measurement of cTnT and NT-proBNP was performed in all 174 patients, cTnI in 103 patients. There were no significant differences for all baseline parameters between the complete group of 174 patients and the subgroup of 103 patients with cTnI measurements. In 8 patients (4.6%), cTnT was raised >0.03 µg/L at the third sample, whereas in the first and second sample, only 4 (2.3%) and 5 (2.9%) patients were cTnT positive. cTnI was raised >0.03 µg/L in 5 (4.9%) patients at the first sample, in 8 (7.8%) patients in the second, and in 7 patients (6.8%) in the third sample. NT-proBNP was elevated in 102 patients (58.6%) in the first sample, in 112 patients (64.4%) in the second sample, and raised to 114 patients (65.5%) in the third sample. Table 2 shows the mean and CI of all laboratory parameters for those patients with raised values.
|
Relation to Outcome
Morbidity
The univariate analysis showed a significant influence on morbidity for many baseline factors (age, sex, lesion size, heart failure, NIHSS, smoking, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic heart disease; Table 3) and a variety of laboratory values at different time points (Table 4). Multivariate analysis performed separately for each significant laboratory parameter revealed a significant impact on outcome for lesion size, sex, and NIHSS. All laboratory parameters failed to show a significant influence if these 3 other parameters were taken into account. A separate analysis of NT-proBNP quartiles in relation to outcome revealed a significantly decreased proportion of patients with good outcome in the quartiles with the highest NT-proBNP (Figure).
|
|
|
Mortality
In the multivariate analysis calculated separately for each significant laboratory parameter, the only significant prognostic factors for mortality were lesion size and heart failure; all other factors did not reach statistical significance.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We discovered similar results for cTnI that was elevated at the maximum in 7.8% of all stroke patients. Two non-English reports described an increased proportion of cTnI in acute stroke, but the available data of the English abstracts are too limited to compare their studies with our results.4,23 However, a recent study reported a higher percentage of troponin Ipositive acute stroke patients.5
Heart failure is an independent predictive factor for death after first cerebral infarction.2426 In patients with chronic heart failure, cTnT is increased and the level parallels the severity of the disease.8 Elevated levels of cTnT also identify patients with latent and progressive myocardial damage and with an increased risk of cardiac events.27 Measurement of NT-proBNP has recently become valuable in the rapid diagnosis of heart failure,11 has been used for risk stratification,12,13 and is even predictive of short-term mortality.14 Because heart failure is associated with dependency after stroke,15 early recognition using NT-proBNP could help rapid initiation of an adequate therapy and might consecutively improve clinical outcome. According to our study, which is the first providing data about the role of NT-proBNP in acute stroke, nearly two thirds of acute stroke patients show raised NT-proBNP levels. This may indicate the presence of at least slight ventricular dysfunction or heart failure in a major proportion of ischemic stroke patients. Another reason for a generally higher level of NT-proBNP in stroke patients could be the sympathetic activation after stroke.6,28 This is supported by the fact that NT-proBNP levels increase within the observed time frame and that the rate is much higher than the proportion of patients with known heart failure. Although NT-proBNP shows a significant influence on the outcome in the univariate analysis, this effect is outweighed if other important predictors of outcome such as initial NIHSS and lesion volume are taken into account.
There are some limitations of our study. First, our sample size is too small to calculate a multivariate analysis with all those factors showing an influence in the univariate analysis. Second, we have taken a reference level for NT-proBNP that is used in patients with heart failure but without stroke. Further data on the magnitude of concomitant heart failure and sympathetic activity in acute ischemic stroke patients would be useful to better understand the clinical significance of our observation. According to our data, the reference range of NT-proBNP used in cardiac patients might not be the same as in stroke patients. The use of a different cut-off limit of NT-proBNP in stroke patients might help identify those patients with early heart failure, which could lead to a more adequate therapy. However, according to our current data, no prognostic implication can be drawn from this increase.
In summary, our study does not confirm that a major subgroup of patients with acute cerebral ischemia show pathologically raised cTnT or cTnI concentrations. According to our analysis, elevated cTnT or cTnI concentration without evident myocardial lesion is found only in 4.6% to 7.8% of all acute ischemic strokes. Measurement of cTnT or cTnI should not currently be included in the routine diagnostic, and it has no impact on the outcome. NT-proBNP is raised in nearly two thirds of patients with acute stroke; and high values are associated with increased morbidity, but its determination has no prognostic implications if other stroke risk factors are considered.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 3, 2004; revision received October 17, 2004; accepted October 26, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. James P, Ellis CJ, Whitlock RM, McNeil AR, Henley J, Anderson NE. Relation between troponin T concentration and mortality in patients presenting with an acute stroke: observational study. BMJ. 2000; 320: 15021504.
3. Ay H, Arsava EM, Saribas O. Creatine kinase-MB elevation after stroke is not cardiac in origin: comparison with troponin T levels. Stroke. 2002; 33: 286289.
4. Trooyen M, Indredavik B, Rossvoll O, Slordahl SA. [Myocardial injury in acute stroke assessed by troponin I]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001; 121: 421425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Christensen H, Johannesen HH, Christensen AF, Bendtzen K, Boysen G. Serum cardiac troponin I in acute stroke is related to serum cortisol and TNF-alpha. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004; 18: 194199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Klingelhofer J, Sander D. Cardiovascular consequences of clinical stroke. Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1997; 6: 309335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Myers MG, Norris JW, Hachinski VC, Weingert ME, Sole MJ. Cardiac sequelae of acute stroke. Stroke. 1982; 13: 838842.
8. Missov E, Mair J. A novel biochemical approach to congestive heart failure: cardiac troponin T. Am Heart J. 1999; 138: 9599.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Maeda K, Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Hisanaga T, Kinoshita M. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker of high left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Am Heart J. 1998; 135: 825832.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Stein BC, Levin RI. Natriuretic peptides: physiology, therapeutic potential, and risk stratification in ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 1998; 135: 914923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, Omland T, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Wu AH, Clopton P, Steg PG, Westheim A, Knudsen CW, Perez A, Kazanegra R, Herrmann HC, McCullough PA; Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study Investigators. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 161167.
12. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Espiner EA, Lainchbury JG, Troughton RW, Elliott J, Frampton C, Turner J, Crozier IG, Yandle TG. B-type natriuretic peptides and ejection fraction for prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 27862792.
13. Ishii J, Nomura M, Nakamura Y, Naruse H, Mori Y, Ishikawa T, Ando T, Kurokawa H, Kondo T, Nagamura Y, Ezaki K, Hishida H. Risk stratification using a combination of cardiac troponin T and brain natriuretic peptide in patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 691695.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Galvani M, Ottani F, Oltrona L, Ardissino D, Gensini GF, Maggioni AP, Mannucci PM, Mininni N, Prando MD, Tubaro M, Vernocchi A, Vecchio C; Italian Working Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology and the Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide on admission has prognostic value across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004; 110: 128134.
15. Appelros P, Nydevik I, Viitanen M. Poor outcome after first-ever stroke: predictors for death, dependency, and recurrent stroke within the first year. Stroke. 2003; 34: 122126.
16. World Health Organization. Proposal for the multinational monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA project). WHO/MNC/82.1 Rev 1. 1983.
17. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864870.
18. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988; 10: 6467.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, van der Meulen J, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin handicap grades after stroke. Stroke. 1995; 26: 20272030.
20. Alpert JS TK, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefineda consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 959969.
21. Baum H, Brothag A, Hafner G, Peetz D, Nassabi C, Oed M, Gerhards-Reich C. Analytical evaluation of the LIAISON troponin I assay. Clin Chem. 2002; 48 (S6): A83.
22. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE III. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 3541.
23. Guerrero-Peral AB, Guerrero-Peral AL, Carrascal Y, Bustamante R, Rodriguez MA, Ponce-Villares MA, Bueno-Rodriguez V. Specific markers of myocardial injury in acute stroke. Rev Neurol. 2002; 35: 901904.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Petty GW, Brown RD Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, OFallon WM, Wiebers DO. Survival and recurrence after first cerebral infarction: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975 through 1989. Neurology. 1998; 50: 208216.
25. Eriksson SE, Olsson JE. Survival and recurrent strokes in patients with different subtypes of stroke: a fourteen-year follow-up study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 12: 171180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Moulin T, Tatu L, Vuillier F, Berger E, Chavot D, Rumbach L. Role of a stroke data bank in evaluating cerebral infarction subtypes: patterns and outcome of 1,776 consecutive patients from the Besancon stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10: 261271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Setsuta K, Seino Y, Takahashi N, Ogawa T, Sasaki K, Harada A, Takano T, Kishida H, Hayakawa H. Clinical significance of elevated levels of cardiac troponin T in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 608611, A9.[CrossRef]
28. Sander D, Winbeck K, Klingelhofer J, Etgen T, Conrad B. Prognostic relevance of pathological sympathetic activation after acute thromboembolic stroke. Neurology. 2001; 57: 833838.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Whiteley, W. L. Chong, A. Sengupta, and P. Sandercock Blood Markers for the Prognosis of Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e380 - e389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A El-Khuffash, D Barry, K Walsh, P G Davis, and E J Molloy Biochemical markers may identify preterm infants with a patent ductus arteriosus at high risk of death or severe intraventricular haemorrhage Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2008; 93(6): F407 - F412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Winkler, C. Wanner, C. Drechsler, J. Lilienthal, W. Marz, V. Krane, and for the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study Investi Change in N-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide and the risk of sudden death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in diabetic dialysis patients Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2092 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maeder, T. Fehr, H. Rickli, and P. Ammann Sepsis-Associated Myocardial Dysfunction: Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Troponins and Natriuretic Peptides Chest, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1349 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |