| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:757.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (T.W., C.R., M.J., M.K., E.S.), and Neuroradiology (H.T.), Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Germany.
Correspondence to Tiemo Wessels, Medizinisches Zentrum für Neurologie und Neurochirurgie Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinki, Am Steg 14, 35393 Giessen, Germany. E-mail tiemo.wessels{at}neuro.med.uni-giessen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results A total of 73 patients (mean age 66 years; range 35 to 83 years) with sudden onset of a classical lacunar syndrome were enrolled. On the basis of the DWI findings, patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1, single subcortical lesion (<15-mm lesion; 43 patients; 59%); group 2, large (
15 mm) or scattered lesions in 1 vascular territory (16 patients; 22%); and group 3, multiple lesions in multiple vascular territories (14 patients; 19%). A stroke mechanism other than SVO could be identified in 17 (23%) patients. Cardiac work-up revealed a cardiac embolic source in 8 patients (11%). Duplex sonography revealed symptomatic stenosis in 9 patients (12%). Based on the work-up information, 29 patients (40%) were found to have a potential cause of stroke other than SVO. A significant correlation with >1 single lesion on DWI-MRI and a clinical proven embolic source was observed (P=0.002). In 9 patients with MRI suspicious for a pathomechanism other than SVO, no embolic source was found.
Conclusions The use of DWI-MRI improves the accuracy of the subtype diagnosis of stroke. Inaccuracy has to be expected in approximately one third if lacunar diagnosis is based on clinical and computed tomography findings. Most of these "false-positive" cases are attributable to large artery or cardiogenic embolic stroke.
Key Words: clinical syndrome lacunar stroke magnetic resonance imaging stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we evaluated the yield of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in patients with a clinically defined acute lacunar stroke syndrome in detecting embolic stroke patterns, which might alter treatment decisions.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients received an extracranial and transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasound examination. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 24-hour Holter-ECG monitoring was obtained in every patient. Additional transesophageal echocardiography was performed if TTE, Holter-ECG and duplex sonography of the extracranial and intracranial vessels did not show evidence for cardiogenic or large artery embolism in 48 (66%) patients.
Computed Tomography Imaging
In all cases, intracranial hemorrhage was excluded by a computed tomography (CT) scan on admission. Brain CT scans (performed on a Somatom Plus CT system; Siemens) were evaluated for cerebral infarction and leukoariosis. The finding of leukoariosis in 7 brain regions was graded by CT: absent, mild (in at least 1 of 7 brain regions), or severe (present in all 7 brain regions), as suggested by van Swieten et al.8
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI was performed within 48 hours of symptom onset on a 1.5-Tesla whole body scanner (General Electrics) equipped with echo planar imaging data capability designed to obtain rapid diffusion images (repetition time 4657 ms; echo time 118 ms; matrix 128x128; gradients of b-values 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2). The apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated for each pixel and composed to an ADC map. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed with a spoiled gradient echo sequence (2D TOF; flip angle 50°; bandwidth 15.63; slice thickness 1.5 mm; field of view 26 cm). Images were reconstructed 3-dimensionally using a maximum intensity projection. All MRI scans were assessed by a neuroradiologist and a neurologist unaware of the clinical findings. On the basis of the DWI findings, the patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) single subcortical lesion (diameter <15 mm); (2) large and scattered lesions in 1 vascular territory (
15 mm; scattered small lesions <15 mm or confluent scattered lesions
15 mm); and (3) multiple lesions in multiple vascular territories as defined in recent studies.9,10
The leukoariosis in 7 brain regions was graded by T2 MRI: absent, mild (in
1 of 7 brain regions) or severe (present in all 7 brain regions), as suggested by van Swieten et al.8
Stroke Subtype
To determine the stroke subtype, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST)11 classification criteria were used. The stroke subtype diagnosis was based on clinical, laboratory and imaging data.
Statistical Analysis
All numerical variables were expressed as mean±SD. The
2 test and Fishers exact tests, if appropriate, were used to analyze the differences between patients with and without more than a single lesion on DWI-MRI. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the frequency of an identifiable mechanism between the patients with a lacunar or embolic stroke mechanisms. Agreement of 2 observers for classification of the DWI was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A level of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A stroke mechanism other than small vessel occlusion (SVO) could be identified in 17 (23%) patients. In 9 patients, an embolism was assumed because of DWI-MRI with scattered and large (group 2) and multiple lesions (group 3). But an embolic source was not found despite duplex sonography of the extracranial and intracranial vessels, cardiac diagnostics, and MR angiography. Based on the work-up information, 29 patients (40%) were found to have a potential cause of stroke other than small vessel occlusive disease.
CT and MRI
No clearly symptomatic acute lesions were identified on admission CT scan. CT showed no (18 patients; 25%), mild (37 patients; 50%), and severe leukoariosis (18 patients; 25%). On DWI, 34 of the 51 patients (67%) had a single hyperintense subcortical lesion with a diameter of
15 mm, consistent with the clinically assumed lacunar stroke; and in 9 patients (17%), a pontine infarct was found (group 1). Eight patients (16%) showed a subcortical single lesion of
15-mm diameter (group 2). In groups 1 and 2, all DWI lesions were located in a region appropriate for the clinical symptoms. Based on the work-up information in 86% of all patients in group 1, the assumed cause of stroke was small vessel occlusive disease (P<0.0001).
Group 3 consisted of 14 patients (Table; Figures 1 and 2
). DWI discovered multiple hyperintense lesions in 1 vascular territory in 7 (10%; group 2), and in >1 territory in 14 patients (21%; group 3), consistent with an embolic stroke pattern. In 13 patients (groups 2 and 3), a single cortical lesion (4 patients; 5%) and scattered or multiple lesion patterns (9 patients; 12%) containing a cortical lesion were observed on DWI. The positive predictive value for the finding of a cortical lesion and an etiology other than SVO resulted in a moderate value of 0.69. The number of large artery arterosclerosis and cardioembolism as underlying stroke reasons did not differ significantly among these patients.
|
|
Agreement of 2 blinded and independent observers for classification of the DWI pattern was excellent (ICC, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99). Sensitivity of the initial clinical classification for the actual presence of a lacunar stroke on DWI was low (0.58). The presence of leukoariosis on initial CT (mild 0.75; severe 0.65) as well as T2-weighted MRI (mild 0.76; severe 0.65) had low positive predictive values for lacunar stroke (<15-mm subcortical ischemia) on DWI.
TOAST Classification
Based on the work-up information, 7 patients in group 1 (18%) were found to have a potential cause of stroke other than small vessel occlusive disease. In 6 patients, cardiac embolism and large artery disease were the assumed underlying etiology.
For group 2, SVO was the stroke etiology for 7 patients (44%), cardiac embolism was diagnosed in 3 patients (18%), and large artery disease in 1 patient (7%). In 4 patients (25%) with scattered lesion patterns, no other stroke risk factor than hypertension was found. As recommended by the guidelines,11 these patients were not classified as SVO because of the lesion pattern. Based on the work-up information, 11 patients of the group with more than a single lesion (69%) were found to have a proven cause of stroke other than small vessel occlusive disease (P<0.0001).
For group 3, a stroke mechanism could be identified in 9 (65%) of these patients. Cardiac work-up (echocardiography; 24-hour Holter-ECG) revealed a cardiac embolic source in 4 patients (29%). AF was diagnosed as the causal mechanism in 3 patients (21%), and in 1 patient, a ventricular thrombus was found. Duplex sonography of the extracranial and intracranial vessels revealed symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis in 5 patients (36%). Altogether, in 9 patients of group 3 (65%), a cause of stroke other than small vessel occlusive disease was diagnosed based on the extensive work-up (P<0.0001). Further significant differences in clinical presentation among the 3 subgroups were not observed.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical management and therapy decisions are influenced by stroke subtype and etiology. Therefore, early classification is of substantial clinical value.12,13 Long-term therapy and prevention differ significantly among distinct stroke subtypes. DWI is a highly sensitive and specific technique for use in the early diagnosis of acute stroke.14,15 DWI provides improved information about embolic lesion pattern compared with CT scan.16,17 This is supported by recent studies using DWI that have shown that patients with assumed subcortical infarcts on DWI may have cortical lesions18 and multiple small deep brain infarcts, indicating an embolic source.9,10,19 Multiple lesions on DWI support an embolic etiology.10,20,21
Those patients with multiple infarctions on DWI were more likely to harbor an identifiable stroke mechanism than those with a single lacunar infarction.15 However, whether multiple DWI lesions in different vascular territories occurring simultaneously are caused by embolic showers or recurrent emboli remains unknown. Other possible explanations are diffuse thrombotic or inflammatory processes that lead to multiple SVOs. Chowdhury et al investigated 10 patients with multiple subcortical lesions in a recent study. A definite embolic source was identified in only 1 patient. The authors assumed a generalized intrinsic process affecting many small cerebral vessels contemporaneously, causing multiple acute small subcortical infarcts.22
In a number of studies, different rates for the detection of embolic sources in patients with multiple DWI lesions were identified.9,19,21 Symptomatic extracranial arteriosclerosis or major cardioembolic sources were found in patients with lacunar infarctions, but 2 to 3x less frequently than among patients with cortical infarctions.19,23 This is supported by our findings in which large artery embolism was found as the underlying stroke mechanism in 6 of 22 patients (27%) with more than a single infarct but only in 3 of 51 patients (6%) with a single lesion on DWI. The importance of aortic arch emboli for a combined finding of subcortical and cortical lesions was confirmed by autoptic studies.24,25 Soloway and Aronson described in 1964 the finding of cholesterol crystals within the leptomeningeal cortical and cerebellar branches and in the deep brain perforating arteries. Vessels with a diameter of 14 µm were loaded with cholesterol emboli. These autopsy findings suggest that if a deep brain artery is occluded by a small embolus, more of such emboli may be expected in different brain vascular territories. The infarction in the territory of a penetrating artery can be explained by its lack of leptomeningeal collateral pathways and a greater susceptibility to ischemia. The finding of multiple acute infarcts in different vascular territories strongly indicates embolism. However, whether DWI lesions are caused by recurrent emboli or embolic showers is still unclear. Using well-accepted criteria for grading of leukoariosis by CT scan and T2 MRI does not result in acceptable positive predictive values for the presence of a small, single lesion on DWI.
Our data and the results of other studies18,19,23 indicate that relying entirely on the clinical presentation as lacunar syndrome may put patients at risk when search of embolic sources is omitted. Inaccuracy has to be expected in about one third if lacunar diagnosis is based on clinical and CT findings. Most of these false-positive cases are attributable to large artery or cardiogenic embolic stroke. Of course, on the other hand, coexisting lacunar infarctions in patients with atherosclerotic or cardiogenic embolic sources are possible. For patients with lacunar syndromes, DWI may be an important modality to obtain the accurate diagnosis and stroke subtype and should prompt the physician to search for an underlying embolic source.
Received October 20, 2004; revision received December 22, 2004; accepted January 10, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fisher CM. Lacunes: Small, deep cerebral infarcts. Neurology. 1965; 50: 841.
3. Fisher CM. A lacunar stroke. The dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome. Neurology. 1967; 17: 614617.
4. Fisher CM. Lacunar infarct of the tegmentum of the lower lateral pons. Arch Neurol. 1989; 46: 566567.
5. Fisher CM. Lacunar strokes and infarcts: a review. Neurology. 1982; 32: 871876.
6. Fisher CM. The arterial lesions underlying lacunes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1968; 12: 115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bogousslavsky JCL, Caplan L. Stroke Syndromes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2001.
8. van Swieten JC, Hijdra A, Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J. Grading white matter lesions on CT and MRI: a simple scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990; 53: 10801083.
9. Baird AE, Lovblad KO, Dashe JF, Connor A, Burzynski C, Schlaug G, Straroselskaya I, Edelman RR, Warach S. Clinical correlations of diffusion and perfusion lesion volumes in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10: 441448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Roh JK, Kang DW, Lee SH, Yoon BW, Chang KH. Significance of acute multiple brain infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2000; 31: 688694.
11. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE III. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 3541.
12. Hennerici MG, Schwartz A. Acute stroke subtypesis there a need for reclassification? Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998; 8 (suppl 2): 1722.
13. Adams HP Jr, Adams RJ, Brott T, del Zoppo GJ, Furlan A, Goldstein LB, Grubb RL, Higashida R, Kidwell C, Kwiatkowski TG, Marler JR, Hademenos GJ; Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2003; 34: 10561083.
14. Warach S, Gaa J, Siewert B, Wielopolski P, Edelman RR. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1995; 37: 231241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kang DW, Chalela JA, Ezzeddine MA, Warach S. Association of ischemic lesion patterns on early diffusion-weighted imaging with TOAST stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol. 2003; 60: 17301734.
16. Hacke W, Warach S. Diffusion-weighted MRI as an evolving standard of care in acute stroke. Neurology. 2000; 54: 15481549.
17. Prichard JW, Grossman RI. New reasons for early use of MRI in stroke. Neurology. 1999; 52: 17331736.
18. Ay H, Oliveira-Filho J, Buonanno FS, Ezzeddine M, Schaefer PW, Rordorf G, Schwamm LH, Gonzalez RG, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion-weighted imaging identifies a subset of lacunar infarction associated with embolic source. Stroke. 1999; 30: 26442650.
19. Lee LJ, Kidwell CS, Alger J, Starkman S, Saver JL. Impact on stroke subtype diagnosis of early diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke. 2000; 31: 10811089.
20. Arauz A, Murillo L, Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F, Higuera J. Prospective study of single and multiple lacunar infarcts using magnetic resonance imaging: risk factors, recurrence, and outcome in 175 consecutive cases. Stroke. 2003; 34: 24532458.
21. Darby DG, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Davis SM. Significance of acute multiple brain infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2000; 31: 22702271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Chowdhury D, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS. Are multiple acute small subcortical infarctions caused by embolic mechanisms? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75: 14161420.
23. Wardlaw JM, Keir SL, Dennis MS. The impact of delays in computed tomography of the brain on the accuracy of diagnosis and subsequent management in patients with minor stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003; 74: 7781.
24. Amarenco P, Duyckaerts C, Tzourio C, Henin D, Bousser MG, Hauw JJ. The prevalence of ulcerated plaques in the aortic arch in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 221225.[Abstract]
25. Soloway HB, Aronson SM. Atheromatous emboli to central nervous system. Report of 16 Cases. Arch Neurol. 1964; 11: 657667.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Toni, M. L. Sacchetti, and M. Prencipe Early Clinical Diagnosis of Lacunar Strokes Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): e152 - e152. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Norrving Lacunar infarcts: no black holes in the brain are benign Practical Neurology, August 1, 2008; 8(4): 222 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Chen, S. Youssof, N. Karanjia, and D. S. Liebeskind Isolated Facial Sensory Loss in Stroke Restricted to the Ventroposteromedial Nucleus Arch Neurol, July 1, 2008; 65(7): 977 - 978. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N U Weir An update on cardioembolic stroke Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 84(989): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): e478 - e534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Adams Jr, G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, R. T. Higashida, E. C. Jauch, C. Kidwell, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1655 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jauss, T. Wessels, S. Trittmacher, J. Allendorfer, and M. Kaps Embolic Lesion Pattern in Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale Compared With Patients Lacking an Embolic Source Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2159 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Warach and J. Wardlaw Advances in Imaging 2005 Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 297 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |