Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:865-868
Published online before print February 24, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157646.52285.c7
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/865    most recent
01.STR.0000157646.52285.c7v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saqqur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Demchuk, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saqqur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Demchuk, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Thrombolysis

(Stroke. 2005;36:865.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Reports

Derivation of Transcranial Doppler Criteria for Rescue Intra-arterial Thrombolysis

Multicenter Experience From the Interventional Management of Stroke Study

Maher Saqqur, MD; Ashfaq Shuaib, MD, FRCPC; Andrie V. Alexandrov, MD; Michael D. Hill, MD; Sergio Calleja, MD; Thomas Tomsick, MD; Joseph Broderick, MD Andrew M. Demchuk, MD

From the Department of Medicine (Neurology) (M.S., A.S.,), University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada; University of Texas–Houston Medical School (A.V.A., S.C.), Houston, Tex; the Department of Clinical Neurosciences (M.D.H., A.M.D.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; the Department of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences (M.D.H.), University of Calgary; and the University of Cincinnati (T.T., J.B.), Ohio.

Correspondence to Dr Andrew M. Demchuk, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Seaman Family MR Research Centre, 1403 29 St, NW Calgary, AB Canada. E-mail ademchuk{at}ucalgary.ca


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has the potential to identify acute stroke patients with arterial occlusion when treatment with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) may fail to open the vessel. We examined clinical utility and prognostic value of TCD flow findings in patients enrolled in an intravenous/intra-arterial rtPA pilot trial (Interventional Management of Stroke [IMS] study).

Methods— Patients enrolled in the IMS trial who underwent urgent TCD performed before intra-arterial rtPA treatment were included. TCD findings were analyzed by a mean flow velocity (MFV) ratio using reciprocal middle carotid artery (MCA) depths bilaterally (affected MCA-to-contralateral MCA MFV ratio [aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio]). The clinical utility of TCD was determined by its ability to predict outcome and identify a proximal arterial occlusion that requires intra-arterial lysis per protocol.

Results— Twenty-nine of 80 patients enrolled in IMS trial had pre–intra-arterial lysis TCD (mean age, 61±11; men-to-women ratio: 17:12; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, 17). No temporal window was found in 3 patients (10%). Cerebral angiography was performed at mean 174±36 minutes from stroke onset. TCD was performed at median 93.5 minutes from onset. The aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio <0.6 had a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63% to 99%), specificity of 100% (97.5%; lower CI of 54%), positive predictive value of 100% (lower CI, 80%); and negative predictive value of 86% (CI, 42% to 99%) for identifying proximal occlusion in the anterior circulation that require intra-arterial lysis. All patients with absent MCA flow (n=6) had poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≥3) (P=0.014).

Conclusion— TCD is a useful modality for evaluating the arterial circulation in acute ischemic stroke patients; it may have significant potential as a screening tool for intravenous/intra-arterial lysis protocols.


Key Words: diagnosis • thrombolysis • ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Approximately half of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator-treated ischemic stroke patients remain disabled or die.1 The modest recanalization rate of 25% to 30% observed with proximal large vessel occlusion may explain the limited effect of systemic thrombolysis alone.2,3 Intra-arterial (IA) thrombolytic therapy may result in better recanalization rates,4,5 but such an approach is associated with delays to treatment incurred by obtaining endovascular access to the target thrombus.

Combination IV and IA therapy (IV–IA) may provide the advantage of early treatment initiation followed by directed drug delivery to the offending thrombus. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) study demonstrated safety for the combined approach using a modified intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) dose followed by additional rtPA intra-arterially. Clinical outcomes were similar but not superior to the treatment arm of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rtPA trial. A trend to better outcomes was seen particularly for patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥20.6 IA intervention, however, is not always necessary in acute stroke. In the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism Trial (PROACT-II),4 142 out of 474 (30%) thrombolysis-eligible patients with clinically suspected middle carotid artery (MCA) occlusion had no or incomplete M1-M2 occlusion on their angiography and did not receive treatment. In the IMS study, 13 out of 77 patients (17%) undergoing angiography did not receive IA therapy because no appropriate lesion was identified that was easily accessible to interventional treatment. Some cases likely recanalize early with IV rtPA alone.2 Angiography could have been avoided if a quick and reliable method were available to detect vessel patency.

One method of identifying appropriate patients when rtPA therapy fails to open the vessel is to use transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). TCD can quickly determine if no occlusion is present7 or whether recanalization has been achieved8–11

Three centers in the IMS trial routinely used urgent TCD screening among patients enrolled in the IMS trial. We thought to evaluate the role of TCD in examining the arterial circulation in patients enrolled in the IMS trial.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The IMS study was a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase II pilot study of combined IV-IA rtPA for patients with acute ischemic stroke in a <3-hour window. IV rtPA (0.6 mg/kg over 30 minutes, 15% bolus) was initiated within 3 hours of symptom onset and patients were taken immediately for diagnostic angiography. If a thrombus in a major vessel was found appropriate to the clinical deficit, IA rtPA was initiated within 5 hours of symptom onset via microcatheter at the site of the thrombus to a maximum dose of 22 mg over 2 hours.

We identified all patients who had TCD performed before digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and after IV rtPA was started. If >1 TCD was performed before DSA, we analyzed only the last study before angiogram. Four different TCD machines were used: TCD 100 mol/L, Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash (25 cases); EZ-Dop, DWL, Germany (3 cases); and Companion, Nicollet, Madison, Wis (1 case). The timing of TCD in relation to IV and IA rtPA was recorded.

Outcomes were completed after IMS protocol. This included baseline, before IA tPA, after IA rtPA, 5-day and 90-day NIHSS scores, and 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores.

Standard descriptive statistics were used. The clinical utility of TCD was determined as a set of TCD mean flow velocities (MFVs) that corresponded to the presence or absence of proximal arterial occlusion that require IA lysis per IMS protocol. TCD findings were analyzed by a MFV ratio using reciprocal MCA depths bilaterally (affected MCA-to-contralateral MCA MFV ratio [aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio]). The highest MFV at the proximal affected MCA depth was divided into 5-mm segments (55 to 60 mm, 50 to 55 mm, 45 to 50 mm, and 40 to 45 mm depth), and the corresponding contralateral MCA MFV at the same 5-mm segments were analyzed. If the contralateral MCA segment was unavailable, we assumed 40 cm/sec as the contralateral corresponding MCA MFV, because this represented a low normal MCA MFV typical of a normal segment in an elderly population.12 If the affected MCA signal was absent, we excluded the possibility of absent temporal window by obtaining good ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery or posterior cerebral artery signal. The prognostic value of TCD was determined as its ability to predict poor outcome (mRS ≥3) regardless of recanalization success using the highest MCA MFV and the aMCA:cMCA MFV ratio.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We studied 29 of 80 patients enrolled in the IMS trial. Four patients were excluded because they did not have TCD or angiography (3 of 29 patients had no temporal windows [10%] and 1 patient had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after IV rtPA and did not have angiography). Among 25 patients available for analysis, there were 9 women and 16 men and with a mean age of 61±11 years. The median baseline NIHSS score was 17 (interquartile range, 13.5 to 22.5). IV rtPA bolus was administrated at mean 124±27 minutes from stroke onset. DSA was performed at mean 174±36 minutes from onset and revealed 4 patients with no occlusions, 2 tandem ICA/MCA (M1, M2) occlusions, 3 ICA-T occlusions, 14 M1 and M2 occlusions, 1 M3-M4 occlusion, and 1 basilar artery occlusion. IA rtPA was initiated in 19 of 25 patients at 211±40 minutes from stroke onset. One patient underwent angiography after intravenous rtPA with IA intervention initiated but rtPA was not administered IA because of equipment failure. Five patients did not have proximal lesions on their DSA amenable to IA intervention (4 no occlusions, one M3–4 branch occlusion).

TCD was performed before IV–IA therapy at a median of 93.5 (interquartile range, 82.5 to 161.5) minutes from symptom onset. Four patients did not have contralateral MCA insonation. We assumed 40 cm/sec as the contralateral corresponding MCA MFV. Excluding the basilar artery occlusion, 6 out of 24 patients had an aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio >0.6. Five of these patients did not have proximal thrombi that would have required IA therapy per protocol. We suspect this measurement error in 1 patient was caused by ICA insonation misinterpreted as MCA insonation. Eighteen patients out of 24 had an aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio <0.6 and all had significant proximal thrombi (Figure 1). All but 1 led to IA therapy, and the 1 exception was because of mechanical failure of equipment.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. An example of 2 patients with and without proximal lesion amenable to interventional therapy. A, Patient with left MCA occlusion that partially resolved and did not require additional IA intervention. The ratio of affected left MCA MFV/unaffected right MCA MFV=0.73 (>0.6).

The aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio <0.6 had sensitivity of 94% (63% to 99%), specificity of 100% (54% to 100%), positive predictive value of 100% (80% to 100%), and negative predictive value of 86% (42% to 99%) for identifying patients with proximal intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation amenable to IA intervention. The MFV ratio among patients with proximal intracranial occlusions was 0.32 compared with 1.0 among those without proximal occlusion. (P<0.001)

Clinical outcome (3-month mRS) was correlated with MCA MFV of the affected side and the aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio in each patient (n=25 patients) (Figure 2). All patients with absent MCA flow signals (n=6) had poor outcomes (mRS ≥3 at 3 months) despite treatment in the IMS protocol (P=0.014). The average highest MCA MFV among patients who achieved an independent outcome at 90 days (mRS 0 to 2) was 34.9 cm/sec compared with 10.8 cm/sec among those dependent or dead at 90 days (mRS 3 to 6) (P=0.006).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Box whisker plots showing the relationship between best MFV in the affected MCA and 90-day outcome on the mRS score. B, MFV ratio (aMCA/cMCA) and the 90-day outcome on the mRS score.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study showed that TCD is a useful modality for evaluating the arterial circulation in acute stroke patients who were enrolled in an interventional treatment trial. The aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio <0.6 appears to be sensitive and specific for identifying lesions proximal enough to be amenable for IA intervention. This simple ratio is very easy to obtain in the acute stroke setting because it requires insonation of only the proximal MCA bilaterally.

Knowledge that patients have persistent major vessel occlusion after IV rtPA is useful in rapid decision-making regarding possible endovascular management. Negative angiograms are common in acute stroke despite significant neurological deficits.4,6 Whereas noninvasive neurovascular imaging using computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography provides definitive evidence of the site of arterial occlusion, unfortunately these modalities are a "snap shot in time" and cannot be easily or continuously repeated during or after IV rtPA. Furthermore, such procedures may take precious time and delay therapy. TCD can be performed continuously and at the bedside during rtPA infusion. TCD is only limited by operator dependence and a 10% to 15% rate of inadequate temporal windows. TCD is particularly suitable in the IA therapy decision-making process because it can identify proximal MCA occlusion (M1, M2).13 In addition, one of the main utilities of TCD is also to demonstrate reflow after thrombolytic therapy. However, this hypothesis was not tested in our study.

The aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio was >0.6 despite a proximal MCA occlusion in 1 patient (false-negative). In this case, we suspect that the terminal ICA was likely insonated instead of proximal MCA to produce an inaccurate MFV on the affected side. Careful attention to probe angulations will minimize this pitfall. Additionally, potentially problematic for an aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio is the presence of severe proximal ICA disease. A flow-limiting ICA lesion can reduce downstream MFV in the MCA without MCA occlusion. Such disease is also likely to produce compensatory flow diversion to the contralateral hemisphere increasing the denominator in the ratio.14,15

In this small study, we observed that all patients with absent MCA flow signals had poor outcomes (mRS ≥3 at 3 months) despite treatment in the IMS protocol (P=0.014). However, the sample is small and other factors such as leptomeningeal collateral via anterior and posterior cerebral arteries were not assessed. We do not advocate withholding treatment if absent MCA flow found. Our sample is too small and these finding require confirmation.

TCD has significant potential as a screening tool for IV–IA lysis protocols to avoid angiography in patients with normal vessels or occlusion too distal to perform an intervention. Our sample size is too small to confirm the clinical utility of the aMCA/cMCA MFV ratio. These criteria require validation and further refinement in a larger sample in subsequent stroke interventional trial.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Alexandrov is supported by the NIH 1 K23 NS02229-01 Career Development Award. Dr Demchuk is supported by the Alberta Heritage Medical Research Foundation, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Alberta/NWT/Nunavut. Dr Saqqur is supported by the Capital Health Region, Edmonton, AB. Dr Hill is supported by the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Alberta/NWT/Nunavut and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Received July 27, 2004; revision received October 7, 2004; accepted October 20, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 1581–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. del Zoppo GJ, Poeck K, Pessin MS, Wolpert SM, Furlan AJ, Ferbert A, Alberts MJ, Zivin JA, Wechsler L, Busse O, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol. 1992; 32: 78–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Uchino K, Molina C, Saqqur M, Demchuk AM, Felberg RA, Calleja S, Wojner AW, Alexandrov AV, for the CLOTBUST Collaborators. Likelihood of early arterial recanalization with intravenous tpa and its predictors: a multicenter transcranial Doppler study. Stroke. 2003; (abstract).
  4. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, Pessin M, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark WM, Silver F, Rivera F. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2003–2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Suarez J I, Sunshine J L, Tarr R, Zaidat O, Selman WR, Kernich C, Landis DMD. Predictors of clinical improvement, angiographic recanalization, and intracranial hemorrhage after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30: 2094–2100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. IMS Study Investigators. Combined intravenous and intra-arterial recanalization for acute ischemic stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004; 35: 904–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Demchuk A, Burgin SW, Christou I, Felberg R, Barber P, Hill M, Alexandrov A. Thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, easy recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2001; 32: 89–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Alexandrov A, Demchuk A, Felberg R, Christou I, Barber P, Burgin SW, Malkoff M, Wojner A, Grotta J. High rate of complete recanalization and dramatic clinical recovery during tPA infusion when continuously monitored with 2-MHz transcranial Doppler monitoring. Stroke. 2000; 31: 610–614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Alexandrov AV, Burgin WS, Demchuk AM, El-Mitwalli A, Grotta JC. Speed of intracranial clot lysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy: sonographic classification and short-term improvement. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2897–2902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Felberg RA, Okon NJ, El-Mitwalli A, Burgin WS, Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV. Early dramatic recovery during intravenous tissue plasminogen activator infusion: clinical pattern and outcome in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1301–1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Burgin WS, Malkoff M, Felberg RA, Demchuk AM, Christou I, Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound criteria for recanalization after thrombolysis for middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1128–1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ringelstein EB, Kahlscheuer B, Niggemeyer E, Otis SM. Transcranial Doppler sonography: anatomical landmarks and normal velocity values. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16: 745–761.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Demchuk AM, Christou I, Wein TH, Felberg RA, Malkoff M, Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV. Accuracy and criteria for localizing arterial occlusion with transcranial Doppler. J Neuroimaging. 2000; 10: 1–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Wilterdink JL, Feldmann E, Furie KL, Bragoni M, Benavides JG, Transcranial doppler ultrasound battery reliably identifies severe internal carotid artery stenosis, Stroke. 1997; 28: 133–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. El-Mitwalli A, Saad M, Christou I, Malkoff M, Alexandrov AV. Clinical and sonographic patterns of tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion in tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients. Stroke. 2002; 33: 99–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. J. del Zoppo and J. A. Koziol
Recanalization and Stroke Outcome
Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): 2602 - 2605.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Mikulik, M. Ribo, M. D. Hill, J. C. Grotta, M. Malkoff, C. Molina, M. Rubiera, R. Delgado-Mederos, J. Alvarez-Sabin, A. V. Alexandrov, et al.
Accuracy of Serial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores to Identify Artery Status in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): 2660 - 2665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Saqqur, K. Uchino, A. M. Demchuk, C. A. Molina, Z. Garami, S. Calleja, N. Akhtar, F. O. Orouk, A. Salam, A. Shuaib, et al.
Site of Arterial Occlusion Identified by Transcranial Doppler Predicts the Response to Intravenous Thrombolysis for Stroke
Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 948 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Sekoranja, J. Loulidi, H. Yilmaz, K. Lovblad, P. Temperli, M. Comelli, and R. F. Sztajzel
Intravenous Versus Combined (Intravenous and Intra-Arterial) Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography-Guided Pilot Study
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1805 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Ribo, J. Alvarez-Sabin, J. Montaner, F. Romero, P. Delgado, M. Rubiera, R. Delgado-Mederos, and C. A. Molina
Temporal Profile of Recanalization After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator: Selecting Patients for Rescue Reperfusion Techniques
Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1000 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Mikulik, A. V. Alexandrov, M. Ribo, Z. Garami, N. A. Porche, E. Fulep, J. C. Grotta, A. W. Wojner-Alexandrov, and J. Y. Choi
Telemedicine-Guided Carotid and Transcranial Ultrasound: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 229 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/865    most recent
01.STR.0000157646.52285.c7v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saqqur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Demchuk, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saqqur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Demchuk, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Thrombolysis