Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
« Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article »
Stroke. 2005;36:880-890
Published online before print February 24, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157668.39374.56
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/880    most recent
01.STR.0000157668.39374.56v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke

(Stroke. 2005;36:880.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Special Report

Emergency Administration of Abciximab for Treatment of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Abciximab Emergent Stroke Treatment Trial (AbESTT) Investigators*

Correspondence to Harold P. Adams Jr, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail harold-adams{at}uiowa.edu, or Werner Hacke, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail werner_hacke{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
 *Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
 down arrowMaterials and Methods
 down arrowResults
 down arrowDiscussion
 down arrowAppendix
 down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Because of its success in treatment of acute cardiac ischemia, there is interest in the use of abciximab for treating patients with acute ischemic stroke. A previous dose-escalation study determined that abciximab could be given safely in a regimen of 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by a 12-hour infusion at 0.125 µg/kg per minute (maximum 10 µg/min). This study was performed to obtain more information about the safety and potential efficacy of abciximab in patients with stroke.

Methods— An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial enrolled 400 patients within 6 hours of onset of ischemic stroke. The primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage that occurred during the first 5 days after stroke. The primary efficacy measure was the distribution of outcomes at 3 months after stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) based on an ordinal regression model of outcomes, adjusting for baseline severity of stroke, age, and interval from stroke.

Results— Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 5 days was diagnosed in 7 of 195 (3.6%) patients treated with abciximab and 2 of 199 (1%) patients given placebo (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; P=0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 25.9). Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation was detected by brain imaging in 24 patients administered abciximab and 33 patients receiving placebo (OR, 0.74; P=0.25; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.3). Treatment with abciximab showed a nonsignificant shift in favorable outcomes as measured by mRS scores at 3 months (OR, 1.20; P=0.33; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.70).

Conclusions— Intravenously administered abciximab can be given to patients with a reasonable degree of safety. The trial also suggests that abciximab could improve outcomes at 3 months after stroke. A larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is necessary to test the efficacy of abciximab.


Key Words: antiplatelet agents • emergency medical treatment • stroke


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 *Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
 down arrowResults
 down arrowDiscussion
 down arrowAppendix
 down arrowReferences
 
Only intravenously administered recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is established as effective for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke.1,2 Although effective, thrombolytic therapy has a low utility in the real-life setting because of the low number of patients treated. Among the reasons for the nonuse of rtPA are the short time window for administration and concerns about the potential for serious intracranial bleeding. In addition, recurrent occlusion leading to neurological worsening can occur after administration of rtPA.3 Recurrent occlusion might be secondary to procoagulant effects of rtPA, and therapies to counteract these actions are needed.4 Hence, there is a need for reperfusion agents that could be safely administered in a longer time window.

Activation of platelets is a key component of acute thromboembolism and experimental studies already demonstrate that interactions of platelets, inflammatory cells, and endothelial cells can affect perfusion.5,6 Two large trials have evaluated aspirin given within 48 hours of stroke.7,8 Whereas aspirin is recommended for treatment of patients with recent ischemic stroke, it is a weak acute antithrombotic agent and cannot be considered as a substitute for reperfusion treatment including rtPA.2

Acute blockade of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor reduces ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention, and preliminary data in ischemic stroke have been encouraging with abciximab.9–14 Abciximab is a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody with high binding affinity for the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor; it also exerts cross-reactivity with other integrins such as the endothelial {alpha}v/ß3 receptor and the leukocyte Mac-1 integrins.15,16 Zhang et al17 documented reduction in infarct volume and improved functional recovery in rodents given abciximab in conjunction with rtPA. They attributed these effects to enhancement of the patency and integrity of the cerebral microvasculature. In a study of patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting, Kopp et al18 found that abciximab was effective in limiting thrombus propagation by reducing interactions between platelets and monocytes. Abciximab also has been given to patients undergoing cerebrovascular procedures and to some patients with ischemic stroke or acute intracranial arterial occlusions.19–27 Morris et al28 successfully administered abciximab and half-dose rtPA to 5 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Lee et al24 gave the combination of intra-arterial urokinase and intravenous abciximab to 10 patients. These patients had a higher rate of recanalization and better functional outcomes than did 16 patients who received only urokinase. Eckert et al29 successfully treated 3 patients with intra-arterial rtPA and abciximab. Some of the studies have reported a potential increase risk in bleeding side effects.25,26 A dose-escalation study in 74 patients found that abciximab could be given safely to a broad spectrum of patients treated within 24 hours of ischemic stroke.30,31 Because bleeding is a potential complication of treatment with abciximab, even in the absence of concomitant thrombolytic therapy, we performed the Abciximab in Emergent Stroke Treatment Trial (AbESTT) to obtain more information about the safety of the medication. In addition, if the agent demonstrated evidence for potential efficacy, the results of the AbESTT could be used to develop a larger clinical trial to test the effectiveness of the agent.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 *Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
 down arrowDiscussion
 down arrowAppendix
 down arrowReferences
 
AbESTT is an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial that tested intravenously administered abciximab given within 6 hours of onset of stroke in carefully selected patients. The primary safety aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of symptomatic (fatal or nonfatal) intracranial hemorrhage that occurred within 5 days or hospital discharge, whichever was sooner (referred as day 5/discharge from now on). The assumption was that more patients administered abciximab would have symptomatic hemorrhages than would the placebo-treated patients. Secondary safety outcomes included asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage detected on brain imaging within 5 days, major nonintracranial hemorrhage within 5 days, thrombocytopenia within 5 days, or deaths within 3 months. A sample size of 400 patients (200 in each group) was selected to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 3.25 in symptomatic hemorrhage rate with an estimated proportion of 0.05 using an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.90.

The primary efficacy aim was a comparison of outcomes at 3 months assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).32 The range of scores was compared between the 2 treatment groups. The null efficacy hypothesis was that the distribution of 3-month mRS scores would be the same for patients assigned treatment with abciximab and those given placebo, when adjusting for baseline covariates of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, age, and interval from stroke until treatment. The alternative hypothesis was that a difference in distribution of mRS scores favoring treatment with abciximab would be similar to that found with intravenous rtPA.1 A secondary analysis evaluated neurological recovery as measured by scores using the NIHSS at 5 days and 3 months.33 In addition, we looked at the number of patients in each treatment group that had mRS score of 0 or 1 at 5 days and 3 months. The latter comparison was the most important secondary endpoint.

A prespecified responder analysis, which judged favorable outcomes based on the baseline NIHSS score, was also performed.34 In this analysis, patients with a NIHSS score of 4 to 7 needed to reach a mRS score of 0; for those with scores of 8 to 14, the mRS score was 0 to 1; and for patients with ≥15 NIHSS scores, a mRS score of 0 to 2 was considered as a favorable response. Other efficacy outcomes included the frequency of neurological worsening (stroke progression) as measured by NIHSS scores at 5 days or recurrent strokes within 3 months.

Patients
Patients older than 18 years with acute ischemic stroke and who could be treated within 6 hours of onset of symptoms were eligible. Their baseline NIHSS score had to be ≥4 and <23. These limits were similar to those used in the dose-escalation study. Baseline screening included a clinical evaluation, noncontrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scan of the brain, and laboratory tests. The respective institutional human research committees had approved the protocol and consent. Before entry, a consent was signed by either the patient or surrogate (next-of-kin) when permitted by regulatory authorities.

Exclusion criteria were similar to those used in other trials testing acute therapies for treatment of ischemic stroke. The leading reasons for exclusion are listed in Table 1. Patients, who might otherwise be treated with intravenous thrombolysis, including most patients seen within 3 hours of onset of stroke, were to be excluded.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Most Common Reasons for Exclusion for Patients Not Enrolling in AbESTT

Randomization, Treatment Regimen, and Ancillary Care
Randomization was at a ratio of 1:1 (abciximab or placebo) with stratification on the basis of baseline severity of stroke (NIHSS score 4 to 14 or 15 to 22) and clinical site.

Pharmacists at the sites dispensed abciximab or identical-appearing placebo. The dosage of the bolus of abciximab was 0.25 mg/kg. It was followed by a 12-hour infusion at a rate of 0.125 µg/kg per minute (maximum infusion was 10 µg/min). After completion of a follow-up CT at 36 to 48 hours after the end of the infusion, patients were subsequently treated with aspirin or other antithrombotic medications at the discretion of the treating physician. Mechanical measures to prevent deep vein thrombosis among bedridden patients were allowed during the treatment period.

Follow-up Clinical and Laboratory Assessments
The baseline clinical evaluation included prestroke mRS score, Barthel Index score, and NIHSS score.35 Investigators performed daily scoring of the NIHSS through day 5 or discharge, whichever was sooner. Follow-up assessments of mRS and Barthel Index were performed by the study coordinators either in person or by telephone at 10 days and 6 weeks. At {approx}3 months, physician investigators evaluated the patients using the mRS, NIHSS, and Barthel Index. Hematological studies were performed at regular intervals through day 5 or discharge. A follow-up CT study was repeated at 36 to 48 hours after completion of the infusion of study agent. Additional diagnostic studies including brain, vascular, or cardiac imaging were ordered at the discretion of the treating physician. Copies of brain imaging studies, including nonscheduled scans, were forwarded for an independent review by neuroradiologists at the University of Iowa. The detection of intracranial bleeding by the neuroradiologists prompted a central review of the patient for possible symptomatic hemorrhage. The stroke subtype was blindly adjudicated using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification system.36

Adverse Experiences and Outcomes, Including Definitions
The reporting of serious adverse experiences followed regulatory requirements. Breaking of the study blind could be performed in the event of an emergency that would require knowledge of the treatment medication.

Deaths, with presumed causes, were recorded. Information about any deaths was collected but only those deaths occurring within 120 days of randomization are included in the analyses. Intracranial hemorrhages were diagnosed by the results of brain imaging. Symptomatic hemorrhage was diagnosed if neurological deterioration was found and if hemorrhage was detected on brain imaging. A causal link between the 2 findings was required. Asymptomatic hemorrhages were those lesions not associated with neurological worsening. Major non-neurological hemorrhages were defined as clinically overt bleeding associated with an absolute decrease in hemoglobin ≥5 g/dL or a decrease in hematocrit of ≥15% (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] criteria) or bleeding associated with persistent or serious disability.37 Minor bleeding included spontaneous gross hematuria or gastrointestinal bleeding but not of sufficient severity to require replacement of blood products or causing a decline of hemoglobin/hematocrit described. Thrombocytopenia was another potential adverse experience that might be attributed to abciximab.38 It was diagnosed if the platelet count declined to <100 000/µL and if >25% decline was found in comparison to baseline levels. Because abciximab can interact with reagents in the blood collection tubes and cause a pseudothrombocytopenia, investigators were asked to investigate this possibility before making the diagnosis of true decline in platelet count.39 The numbers of patients treated with blood or platelet transfusions also were assessed. Other serious or nonserious adverse events were recorded through day 5 and 3 months. The rates of bleeding or other adverse experiences were categorized as those happening within 5 days of entry and those events occurring up to 3 months after stroke.

Outcomes were assessed at 5 days and 3 months. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was the mRS score at 3 months. The maximal time period for performance of all outcome assessments for inclusion in the 3-month analyses was 120 days. Any assessment performed after that time was not included in the analyses for either efficacy or safety. The last observation carried forward was used for assessments performed before 60 days. Neurological improvement was defined as a ≥4-point reduction in the NIHSS score. Neurological deterioration (neurological worsening or progressing stroke) was defined as a ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score or a ≥1-point increase in the score in the consciousness component of the NIHSS. Stroke progression is defined as neurological deterioration reflecting the area of the infarction through discharge or day 5 and not causally related to hemorrhage or another explanation such as a metabolic abnormality. Recurrent stroke was diagnosed if new neurological deficits reflecting another area of the brain other than that affected by the original stroke were found or if new impairments developed >5 days after stroke.

Role of Funding Sources and Overall Conduct of the Trial
This trial was funded through research grants from Eli Lilly and Centocor. The trial was designed as a registration study to submit to the US Food and Drug Administration to support a marketing approval for abciximab for treatment of patients with ischemic stroke. Representatives of Eli Lilly and Centocor participated in the design and conduct of the trial. They also served as ex-officio members of the Steering and Publications Committees. Representatives of the sponsors performed on-site monitoring of the data and patient records for quality assurance and regulatory reporting. Interim and final data analyses were performed by the Data Management Center at Centocor. The investigators had the opportunity to probe the database and to independently review the results of the analyses.

A steering committee with co-principal investigators from Europe and North America (Werner Hacke, MD and Harold P. Adams Jr, MD) supervised the trial. Clinical coordinating centers were located in Heidelberg, Germany and Iowa City, Iowa. Participating sites, with the number of enrolled patients and key members of the research teams, are listed in the Appendix. Assignment of treatments was via a central telephone system coordinated at Nottingham Clinical Research, United Kingdom. Data were submitted using provided case report forms. Copies of brain imaging studies also were submitted to the University of Iowa for independent blinded review by a panel of neuroradiologists. Another independent adjudication panel (Clinical Endpoint Committee) blindly reviewed all potential safety endpoints, deaths, or cases of possible recurrent or progressing stroke. All individual safety reports and interim analyses were shared with an independent external safety monitoring committee.

A publications committee (Appendix) is responsible for reporting the scientific data and the writing of this article. The sponsors had the opportunity to review this publication before submission for the purpose of ensuring the medical accuracy of the data reported and to determine if documents needed to be filed to protect the intellectual property interests in the compound or its uses.

Statistical Plans
All efficacy analyses were conducted on an intent-to-treat basis, as defined by treatment assignment group, whereas safety analyses were performed only on data from patients who actually received some study agent, a strategy that is commonly used in large clinical trials.40 During the design of the trial, available data did not provide sufficient evidence about the direction of the effects of abciximab on the endpoints to justify the use of 1-sided testing and, as a result, 2-sided probability values were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to compare the rates of intracranial hemorrhage, recurrent stroke, or stroke progression. Other dichotomous safety endpoints were compared between treatment groups using {chi}2 tests. Three-month mortality rate was performed using Kaplan-Meier mortality estimation41 based on those deaths that occurred within 120 days of randomization. Mortality was analyzed using a logrank test between the 2 groups.

All analyses for efficacy were performed on the intention-to-treat population, regardless of whether study medication was administered. For patients with missing outcome data, the last observation was carried forward. The primary efficacy analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model (proportional odds or cumulative logit model) described by Agresti.42 This analysis compared the distribution of 3-month mRS scores between treatment groups, both unadjusted and adjusted for baseline NIHSS score, the time from onset of stroke until treatment, age, and time to follow-up. A Wald {chi}2 test from the multivariate regression model was used to compare the treatment effect on the distribution of mRS scores at 3 months. Analyses of secondary endpoints were not adjusted for baseline covariates. Odds ratios were estimated by the Mantel-Haenzel method43 and the 95% confidence limits were calculated using the procedures developed by Robins, Breslow, and Greenfield.44


*    Results
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMaterials and Methods
 *Results
down arrowDiscussion
 down arrowAppendix
 down arrowReferences
 
Overall Study Performance
Between May 2000 and February 2002, 401 patients (200 in placebo group) were enrolled in 38 sites in Europe and North America (Figure 1). One patient (assigned abciximab) immediately withdrew consent and was withdrawn from the study. This patient would not permit use of any data, including those collected at baseline. During the enrollment period, 5342 patients were screened. The primary reasons for exclusion are listed in Table 1. Many patients had >1 reason for exclusion.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Populations of patients. *Data from all enrolled patients are included in subsequent analyses of efficacy. Data from all patients who actually received study agents are included in the analysis for safety. One enrolled patient withdrew from the trial and refused permission to use any collected data.

Six patients did not receive treatment (abciximab, 5; placebo, 1), largely as the result of detection of an exclusion criterion after enrollment; the most common reason was hypertension. Approximately one-half of the patients were treated >5 hours after onset of stroke. (Table 2). Study agent was started after 6 hours in 13 patients (abciximab, 5; placebo, 8). Delays in treatment, which were largely attributed to logistical issues, ranged from 3 to 63 minutes (median, 17 minutes).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Baseline Characteristics of Enrolled Patients

Study agent was halted before the end of the 12-hour infusion in 9 patients (Figure 1). Reasons for premature stopping of the infusion were bleeding in 3 abciximab-treated patients (2 intracranial bleeding) and thrombocytopenia in 1 placebo-treated patient. Two placebo-treated patients had study agent halted because of hypertension. An investigator broke the study allocation (blind) for 1 placebo-treated patient.

Twenty-six patients (abciximab, 14) received another antithrombotic medication, most commonly aspirin,17 after enrollment and before the 24-hour to 36-hour follow-up CT examination. Subsequently, antithrombotic medications administered within 5 days of stroke included aspirin for 209 patients (abciximab, 105), clopidogrel for 60 (abciximab, 26), dipyridamole for 13 (abciximab, 5), oral anticoagulants for 46 (abciximab, 21), and heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins for 79 (abciximab, 32).

Follow-up assessments within the desired time window of 3 months were obtained in 385 patients (abciximab, 195), including those patients who had died. Fifteen patients (abciximab, 5) had the last observation carried forward to 3 months. Three patients returned after the 120-day window; the final analyses used the scores obtained at the last visit within the 120-day window and not the scores that were obtained later. The treatment assignments and the earlier and subsequent mRS scores were (#1 placebo, 3/1; #2 placebo, 4/4; and #3 abciximab, 3/2). Two patients (abciximab, 1) were known to be alive but refused to return for assessments. The local sites could not arrange a follow-up visit for 3 placebo-treated patients who were known to be alive. Five patients (abciximab, 1) were lost to follow-up. The only data from 1 patient in the abciximab group were collected at baseline; as a result, the last mRS score was the prestroke value (Figure 1).

Baseline Features
Overall, baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 treatment groups (Table 2). No significant differences were found in regard to epidemiological factors, interval from stroke, laboratory assessments, brain imaging studies, or previous use of medications. The stratification assured that the numbers of more seriously affected patients (NIHSS score >14) were equal in the 2 treatment groups. However, a difference in severity of strokes was noted among those patients with lower NIHSS scores (Table 2). Ninety-two patients in the abciximab group had scores of 4 to 7, whereas 75 patients in the placebo group had such scores. The mean NIHSS scores for the abciximab-treated and placebo-treated patients were 9.7 and 10.2, respectively (P=0.32). The median NIHSS scores for the abciximab-treated and placebo-treated patients were 8 and 9 (P=0.19). The subtypes of stroke listed in Table 2 are those diagnosed in the external adjudication process.

Safety
Forty-three patients died during the follow-up period; 10 patients (abciximab, 8) died during the first 5 days (Table 3). No significant difference in mortality was observed (log-rank test P=0.27). The leading causes of death were related to the qualifying stroke, including brain edema, medical complications of the stroke, or heart disease. Ten patients in the placebo group and 5 in the abciximab group died as a result of the initial stroke. Although 2 patients (1 in each group) died after the diagnosis of a symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, neither death was ascribed directly to the bleeding. Pneumonia was the cause of death in the patient treated with abciximab. A placebo-treated patient died from a recurrent stroke.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Listing of Adverse Experiences Among Patients: Safety Events Within 5 Days and at 3 Months*

Intracranial Hemorrhages
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages occurred within 5 days of entry in 7 patients treated with abciximab (3.6%) (patients 3 and 5 to 10 in Tables 3 and 4Down and Figure 2) and 2 patients treated with placebo (1%) (patients 1 and 2 in Tables 3 and 4 Down and Figure 2) (OR, 3.7; P=0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 25.9). Figure 2 shows the locations and types of symptomatic hemorrhages. One case of symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in an abciximab-treated patient in the interval from day 5 to 3 months (patient 4). The locations of the symptomatic hemorrhage were within the area of the qualifying infarction in 9 patients (abciximab, 7). Extension of bleeding into another brain location was found in 1 patient treated with abciximab. Three abciximab-treated patients had intraventricular blood found on CT. The timing of the events, the changes in NIHSS scores, and the concomitant medications are described in Table 4. Five abciximab-treated and both placebo-treated patients had used aspirin within the 7 days before randomization. One abciximab-treated patient had received warfarin within 7 days of entry in the trial. None of the patients who had a symptomatic hemorrhage had a favorable outcome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Cases of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Brain imaging findings in 10 cases of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. These studies show the pattern, extent, and location of the hemorrhages that were adjudicated as being symptomatic.

Intracranial bleeding, not associated with neurological worsening, was found in 24 patients treated with abciximab and 32 placebo-treated patients. (Table 3) These scans were obtained either acutely or at other intervals before the 3-month visit. Two placebo-treated patients had bleeding outside the area of the qualifying stroke; all other cases were located in the infarction.

Other Bleeding, Thrombocytopenia, or Other Serious Adverse Events
Within the first 5 days, 3 placebo-treated patients had major (2) or minor (1) bleeding as defined by the modified TIMI classification. Eight abciximab-treated patients had bleeding events, and 3 were major. (Table 3). Thirty abciximab-treated and 45 placebo-treated patients had 1 or more other serious adverse experiences recorded during the first 5 days. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 8 patients (abciximab, 5). Five patients (abciximab, 4) had cardiac arrests. Four patients (2 in each group) had congestive heart failure. Four placebo-treated patients and none treated with abciximab had brain edema. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 1 abciximab-treated patient and 2 placebo-treated patients. One abciximab-treated patient had myocardial ischemia diagnosed.

Neurological Worsening or Recurrent Stroke
Stroke progression was diagnosed within the first 5 days/discharge in 14 abciximab-treated and 24 placebo-treated patients (P=0.12; OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.15). Neurological worsening occurred within the first 48 hours in 12 abciximab-treated and 20 placebo-treated patients (P=0.14; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.28). Recurrent strokes were diagnosed within 3 months in 7 abciximab-treated and 8 placebo-treated patients (P=1.0; OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.28 to 2.70).

Outcomes at 3 Months
The ordinal regression model of mRS scores adjusted for the baseline variables found a nonsignificant shift of mRS scores in favor of treatment with abciximab (P=0.33; OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.70). This result, which reflects the numbers of patients in each category of the mRS (Figure 3), was the primary efficacy analysis. The unadjusted ordinal regression also was in favor of abciximab (P=0.06; OR, 1.39; 95% CI=0.98 to 1.97).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Distribution of outcomes at 3 months using mRS. The distribution of these events was used in the primary efficacy analysis.

The ranges of mRS scores in the 2 treatment groups are shown in Figure 3. At 3 months, 97 of 200 patients (48.5%) assigned to treatment with abciximab had a mRS score of 0 or 1 compared with 80 of 200 patients (40%) in the placebo (P=0.09; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.10). This result is not adjusted to baseline NIHSS score, age, or interval from stroke until treatment.

By 3 months, the percentage of responders (rates of favorable outcomes as influenced by baseline NIHSS score) was higher with abciximab (73/200, 36.5%) than with placebo (54/200, 27%) (Mantel-Haenszel P=0.04; Mantel-Haenszel OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.012 to 2.38). Neurological improvement by day 5/discharge was diagnosed in 98 of 200 (49%) abciximab-assigned patients and in 77 of 200 (38.5%) (P=0.03; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.33). Neurological recovery by day 5 (NIHSS 0 to 1) was found more frequently with abciximab (57/200, 28.5%) than with placebo (33/200, 16.5%) (P=0.004; OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.38). At 3 months, 46% (92/200) of abciximab-treated patients had NIHSS scores of 0 to 1, whereas 34% (68/200) placebo-treated patients had these scores (P=0.01; OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.48). At 3 months, 57.5% (115/200) of patients in the abciximab-assigned group had scores of 95 to 100 on the Barthel Index and 50.5% (101/200) of placebo-treated patients had similar outcomes (P=0.16; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.97). The frequencies of favorable outcomes among the placebo and abciximab-treated groups as influenced by the baseline stratification variable for severity of impairments and rates of favorable outcomes as influenced by baseline severity of stroke using the responder analysis are shown in Figure 4.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Unadjusted (black line) and adjusted (gray line) ORs of favorable responses as influenced by the baseline score on the NIHSS. The factors used in the adjusted ORs include the patient age, baseline NIHSS score within the group, and the time to follow-up. Because some patients did not receive study agent, the interval from stroke until treatment was not included in the adjusted analyses. For the 2 pairs of images on the left, the scores are calculated based on the baseline stratification of baseline NIHSS score and favorable outcomes were defined as mRS of 0 or 1. The ORs of the 3 pairs of images on the right side of the figure correspond to the responder analysis that defined favorable outcomes as mRS scores adjusted by the baseline NIHSS score. For a patient with a baseline NIHSS score of 4 to 7, a mRS score of 0 was needed to achieve a favorable outcome. For patient with a baseline NIHSS score of 8 to 14, a mRS score of 0 to 1 was rated as a favorable outcome. For a patient with a baseline NIHSS of 15 to 22, a mRS score of 0 to 2 was considered as a favorable outcome.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMaterials and Methods
 up arrowResults
 *Discussion
down arrowAppendix
 down arrowReferences
 
AbESTT is a preliminary trial testing a promising therapy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. It used components of modern clinical trial design and conduct to achieve an unbiased evaluation of the safety and potential efficacy of abciximab. The design of the trial included 2-sided tests to provide a cautious estimate of differences in responses to treatment. This testing strategy is appropriate to not falsely conclude a finding in a phase 2 trial such as AbESTT. Such an approach also is compatible with current regulatory guidance. The criteria for entry of patients were similar to those included in other acute stroke trials. The demographic factors are representative of a population of patients with acute stroke; thus, the results of AbESTT can be compared with those achieved with other trials testing promising therapies for acute stroke. Although we did attempt to achieve homogeneity in the severity of strokes between the 2 treatment groups using the NIHSS score as a stratification variable, we did have an important difference in baseline scores among the patients with less severe strokes. This disparity in stroke severity probably is secondary to the relatively small size of the trial.

The trial was designed to test the safety of abciximab in a regimen that is used to treat patients with myocardial ischemia and is based on the results of a previously performed dose-escalation study.11,12,30 Rather than administering the agent in combination with anticoagulants, other antiplatelet agents, or thrombolytic medications, as is the usual course of therapy with acute myocardial ischemia, the trial tested abciximab without the simultaneous administration of other antithrombotic agents primarily because of concerns about the potential for bleeding.

Early reconstitution of blood flow appears to be critical for successful treatment of stroke. However, the short interval for safe and effective administration of rtPA is one of the major limitations of this therapy. Therefore, one of the goals of this study was to test the safety and potential efficacy of another intravenous agent that affects perfusion and that could be administered >3 hours after stroke. We limited enrollment to patients who could be treated within 6 hours of stroke, a time window that is similar to that employed in a trial of intra-arterial thrombolysis.45

The trial tested the potential usefulness of abciximab when the agent was added to best medical treatment. The control group received placebo. The use of placebo is scientifically and ethically justified because only rtPA is established as effective in improving outcomes after stroke. The trial emphasized that patients who could be treated with rtPA should receive this medication instead of being enrolled. However, for those centers where thrombolytic therapy was not available, treatment within 3 hours of stroke was permitted and 14 patients did receive study agent in this time period. We have no evidence that patients who could have been treated with rtPA were shunted into the trial. As the result of these steps, the results of AbESTT largely reflect treatment of patients at 3 to 6 hours after stroke. Aspirin could be administered after completion of the follow-up CT scan, and in most cases the medication was started within 48 hours of onset of stroke. This approach did not present a safety issue related to early recurrent stroke that might have been prevented with early aspirin therapy. We anticipated that some cases of hemorrhagic transformation of the infarction would occur. We expected that the number of events would be greater than that associated with the early administration of aspirin but less than that accompanying rtPA. Overall, abciximab appears relatively safe. Compared with placebo, the chances of early (<5 days) symptomatic bleeding (as defined by a 4-point increase in NIH Stroke Scale score or 1-point increase in the NIH Stroke Scale consciousness item) were increased from 1% to 3.6%, although the rate of asymptomatic bleeding detected by CT was higher among the placebo-treated patients. Despite treating most patients >3 hours after stroke, none of the hemorrhages was fatal in AbESTT. Although the rate of bleeding is higher than the {approx}0.1% absolute increase reported in the studies of aspirin, the potential for efficacy in improving outcomes also is far greater.7,8 Thus, the risk-to-benefit ratio seems favorable for the use of abciximab.

In AbESTT, most bleeding events were detected within the first 48 hours of treatment, an experience that is similar to that noted with thrombolytic therapy.46 Eight of the 10 cases of symptomatic intracranial bleeding were among the group of patients with larger strokes. This finding is similar to that found with use of rtPA or anticoagulants.47,48 Just as with administration of other medications with potent effects on coagulation, our experience suggests that caution should be exercised when given abciximab to seriously affected patients. Some of the symptomatic hemorrhages occurred among patients who received other antithrombotic medications either before entry into the trial or after the initial treatment period. Such occurrences support our decision to test the safety of abciximab administered without other agents that affect coagulation during the acute treatment period. The rates of other serious bleeding complications or thrombocytopenia were low. Mortality was not increased among the patients treated with abciximab. This trial shows that abciximab can be administered within 6 hours of stroke to a broad spectrum of patients with a reasonable assurance for safety.

Because of the relatively small sample size, the investigators did not expect the trial to provide definitive data about the usefulness of abciximab in treatment of patients of stroke. Still, AbESTT provides the opportunity to look at a trend for potential efficacy of the agent. We included an ordinal regression model to take into account the range of mRS scores and the data, when adjusted for important variables including age, interval until treatment, and severity of stroke, provide a hint that abciximab is associated with improved outcomes at 3 months. In addition, we prespecified several other efficacy analyses based on dichotomous endpoints, such as the percentage of patients with mRS scores of 0 to 1 at 3 months. We are encouraged by the results when one considers that the agent was given up to 6 hours after onset of stroke and no other intravenously administered therapy has been established as useful in this time period. We also found a trend in favor of treatment using the responder analysis, which adjusted desired outcomes in response to baseline NIHSS score. We noted improvement with treatment among those patients with mild-to-moderately severe stroke. The absolute differences in rates of favorable outcomes ranged from 8% to 12% (Figure 4).

The efficacy results of this study need to be interpreted with care because the number of patients enrolled in AbESTT is relatively small. Our experience with abciximab for treatment of acute ischemic stroke still is limited. AbESTT does not establish the efficacy of abciximab in improving outcomes when it is administered within 6 hours of onset of acute ischemic stroke. We also should take into consideration that an important difference in baseline characteristics (baseline severity of stroke) was apparent between the 2 groups. Some of the success of abciximab treatment might be secondary to treating less seriously affected patients. However, the results of this trial suggest that the agent might be both beneficial and safe, particularly among patients with mild-to-moderate stroke. Given that the majority of patients in this trial were treated >3 hours after stroke onset, these results are particularly relevant to the large number of patients who arrive too late for treatment with intravenous rtPA.


*    Appendix
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMaterials and Methods
 up arrowResults
 up arrowDiscussion
 *Appendix
down arrowReferences
 
Publications Committee: Harold P. Adams Jr, MD; Werner Hacke, MD; Barry Oemar, MD; Antoni Dávalos, MD; Ruth A. Cook, MPH; Paul Trouillas, MD; Franz Fazekas, MD; Julien Bogousslavsky, MD; Jeffrey Hilburn, MD; James Torner, PhD; Jacques Leclerc, MD, FRCP; Ashfaq Shuaib, MD; Philip Reid, MD.

Participating Sites (Principal investigators [PI], Co-investigators [CI], and Coordinators [SC]) listed by the number of patients enrolled:

Girona, Spain (n=32) A. Dávalos (PI); Y. Silva, M. Castellanos, J. Serena, L. Ramió (CI); M. Puigdemont (SC); Edmonton, AB (n=29) A. Shuaib (PI); N. Amir, N. Dean, K. Khan, M. Muratoglu, M. Saqqur (CI); E. Kadribasic, D. Burridge, Z. Dean, E. Rudd, K. Tariq, S. Wedderburn (SC); Heidelberg, Germany (n=26) W. Hacke (PI); P. Ringleb, R. Weber, F. Buggle, R. Kollmar, S. Rieger, C. Schranz, S. Külkens, C. Berger, J. Bardutzki, K. Glatz, J. von Engelhard, C. Korner, A. Romanowski (CI); P. Schnitzer, Jenny Knapp (SC); Graz, Austria (n=23) F. Fazekas (PI); S. Horner, P. Kapeller, K. Niederkorn, G. Roob (CI); Nice, France (n=23) M.H. Mahagne (PI); A. Dunac (CI); Lyon, France (n=19) P. Trouillas (PI); L. Derex, N. Nighoghossian (CI); Indianapolis, IN (n= 17) J. Hilburn (PI); R. French, M. Janicki, C. Simchak, J. Bales, S. Reid, T. Mayer, K. Rodman (CI); P. Paschke (SC); Linz, Austria (n=16) F. Aichner (PI); H.P. Haring, M. Schnizer, J. Knapp (CI); S. Metz (SC); Lausanne, Switzerland (n=16) J. Bogousslavsky (PI); M. Reichhart, F. Vingerhoets (CI); S. Remillard (SC); Dresden, Germany (n=15) H. Reichmann (PI); G. Gahn, G. Hahn, A. Kunz, U. Becker, V. Pütz (CI); Barcelona, Spain (n=14) J. Sabin (PI); C. Molina, J. Arenillas, J. Montaner, S. Abilleira (CI); Ocala, FL (n=13) K. Ng (PI); G. Howell, J. Gaudier, W. Gaya (CI); M. Holycross (SC); Minden, Germany (n=13) O. Busse (PI); J. Glahn, J. Philipps (CI); M. Post (SC); Chattanooga, TN(n=12) T. Devlin (PI); H. Kadrie, S. Farber, A. Ackell, B. Kaplan, G.H. Jackson, D. Rankine, R. Chander (CI); T. Owen, P. Wade Hardie, C. Turner, D. Riddle, H. Dolan, P. Levi, A. Ragan (SC); Vancouver, BC (n=11) P.A. Teal (PI); A.R. Woolfenden, J.H. Beckman, K. Chapman (CI); C. Johnston, D. Synnot, M. Rusak, T. Steele (SC); Paris, France (n=11) F. Woimant (PI); I. Crassard, F. Pico, S. Berroir, A. Abdoulnayef, R. Djomby, H. Chabriat, K. Vahedi, M. Mazighi, A. Ducros, K. Berthet (CI); Utrecht, The Netherlands (n=9) L.J. Kappelle (PI); H.B. van der Worp (CI); M. van Buuren (SC); Madrid, Spain (n=9) E. Díez-Tejedor (PI); B. Fuentes (CI); S. Escalante (CI/SC); Baltimore, MD (n=8) M.P. LaMonte (PI); M.N. Bahouth, R. Gunawardane, K.L. Yarbrough, M.Y. Pathan (CI); San Diego, CA (n=7) P. Lyden (PI); C. Jackson, T. Hemmen, B. Meyer, J. Zivin (CI); N. Kelly, J. Werner, K. Rapp (SC); St. Louis, MO (n=6) A. Nassief (PI); C. Hsu, J. Moo, E. Garcia-Morales, A. Alreshaid, A. Acharya (CI); C. Hess, D. Shearrer, J. Epps-Wilbanks (SC); Des Moines, IA (n=6) M.R.K. Jacoby (PI); B. Hughes, R. Hamilton, P. Babikian (CI); P. McManus (SC); Philadelphia, PA (n=6) S. Kasner (PI); B. Cucchiara, D. Liebeskind, M. McGarvey, X. Morales (CI); K. Mack, S. Shaw, J. Luciano, M. Corrozi (SC); Tuscalossa, AL (n=6) E.E. Marsh III (PI); T.K. Emig, J.D. Geyer, B.K. Hogan, B.H. Lucy III, A.J. Otero, D.C. Potts (CI); D.S. Harris, M.M. Crawford (SC); Quebec, PQ(n=6) D. Simard (PI); A. Mackey, S. Verreault, F. Émond (CI); A. Haché, B. Léger, L. Fournier, S. Dub (SC); Sacramento, CA(n=5) P. Akins (PI); R. Atkinson, D. Dozier, W. Au, S. Knox (CI); C. DeLemos, D. Wentworth, S. Croopnick (SC); Cleveland, OH (n= 5) A. Furlan (PI); I. Katzan, A. Abou-Chebl, D. Krieger, M. DeGeorgia, J. Andrefsky, B. Dyko, N. Rudd, J. Petrich, L. Strozniak (CI); M. Horvat (SC); Rochester, NY (n= 5) C. Benesch (PI); Calgary, AB (n=5) A. Buchan (PI); A. Demchuk, M. Hill, P. Barber, S. Coutts, J. Kennedy, J. Simon, A. Tomanek (CI); K. Ryckborst, C. Kenney, L. Sinclair, L. Paddock-Eliasziw, A. Button, M. Schebel (SC); Regensburg, Germany (n=5) U. Bogdahn (PI); P. Erban, M. Seidl, M. Horn (CI); Toronto, ON (n=4) F. Silver (PI); Oceanside, CA (n=4) J. Schim (PI); T. Chippendale, M. Lobatz, B. Frishberg, E. Diamond, G. Sahagian, M. Sadoff (CI); G. Wochaski (SC); Long Island Jewish, NY (n=4) T. Kwiatkowski (PI); R. Libman, R. Bhatnagar, R. Benson, Z. Faynblet (CI); R. Gonzaga-Camfield, Y. Grant (SC); Amsterdam, The Netherlands (n=4) V. Kwa (PI); W. Boogerd, H.L. Hamburger, C.L. Kraaijeveld, J.J. van der Sande (CI); Marburg, Germany (n=3) W. Oertel (PI); T. Back, H. Pape (CI); Nashville, TN (n=2) A. Callahan (PI); D. Uskavitch, S. Graham, B. Thompson (CI); L. Raessler (SC); Marshfield, WI (n=1) K. Madden (PI); P. Karanjca, E. St. Louis (CI); K. Mancl (SC); Winston Salem, NC (n=1) P. Reynolds (PI); C. Tegeler, D. Lefkowitz, J. Greenberg, F. Khan, G. Wittenberg, C. O’Donovan, I. Singh (CI); J. Satterfield, L. Westerberg (SC).


*    Footnotes
 
*For the full listing of AbESTT Investigators please see Appendix. Back

Presented in part at the 127th Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association, New York, October 16, 2002, and the 28th Annual International Stroke Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, February 15, 2003.

Received September 7, 2004; revision received December 1, 2004; accepted December 21, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMaterials and Methods
 up arrowResults
 up arrowDiscussion
 up arrowAppendix
 *References
 

  1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 1581–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Adams HP, Adams RJ, Brott T, del Zoppo GJ, Furlan A, Goldstein LB, Grubb RL, Higashida R, Kidwell C, Kwiatkowski TG, Marler JR, Hademenos GJ; Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke. A scientific statement from the stroke council of the Am Stroke Association. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1056–1083.[Free Full Text]
  3. Alexandrov AV, Grotta JC. Arterial reocclusion in stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Neurology. 2002; 59: 862–867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chopp M, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Jiang Q. The clot thickens—thrombolysis and combination therapies. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum. 1999; 73: 67–71.
  5. Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Tsang W, Goussev A, Powers C, Ho KL, Morris D, Smyth SS, Coller BS, Chopp M. Dynamic platelet accumulation at the site of the occluded middle cerebral artery and in downstream microvessels is associated with loss of microvascular integrity after embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res. 2001; 912: 181–194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Zhang ZG, Chopp M, Goussev A, Lu D, Morris D, Tsang W, Powers C, Ho KL. Cerebral microvascular obstruction by fibrin is associated with upregulation of PAI-1 acutely after onset of focal embolic ischemia in rats. J Neurol Sci. 1999; 19: 10898–10907.
  7. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997; 349: 1569–1581.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) Collaborative Group. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997; 349: 1641–1649.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Choudhri TF, Hoh BL, Zerwes HG, Prestigiacomo CJ, Kim SC, Connolly ES Jr, Kottirsch G, Pinsky DJ. Reduced microvascular thrombosis and improved outcome in acute murine stroke by inhibiting GP IIb/IIIa receptor-mediated platelet aggregation. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1301–1310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kaku S, Umemura K, Mizuno A, Yano S, Suzuki K, Kawasaki T, Nakashima M. Evaluation of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist YM337 in a primate model of middle cerebral artery thrombosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998; 345: 185–192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Reginelli JP, Topol EJ. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: current indications and future prospects. Am J Med. 2000; 109: 252–254.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Akkerhuis KM, Deckers JW, Lincoff AM, Tcheng JE, Boersma E, Anderson K, Balog C, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Simoons ML. Risk of stroke associated with abciximab among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2001; 286: 78–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Schomig A, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Mehilli J, Schricke U, Pache J, Martinoff S, Neumann FJ, Schwaiger M. Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 385–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Lansky AJ; Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 957–966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Schwarz M, Nordt T, Bode C, Peter K. The GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab (c7E3) inhibits the binding of various ligands to the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). Thromb Res. 2002; 107: 121–128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Fintel DJ. From bench to bedside: GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors. Neurology. 2001; 57: S12–S19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhang L, Zhang ZG, Zhang R, Morris D, Lu M, Coller BS, Chopp M. Adjuvant treatment with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor increases the therapeutic window for low-dose tissue plasminogen administration in a rat model of embolic stroke. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2837–2843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kopp CW, Steiner S, Nasel C, Seidinger D, Mlekusch I, Lang W, Bartok A, Ahmadi R, Minar E. Abciximab reduces monocyte tissue factor in carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2560–2567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Heo JH, lee KY, Kim SH, Kim DI. Immediate reocclusion following a successful thrombolysis in acute stroke: a pilot study. Neurology. 2003; 60: 1684–1686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ho DS, Wang Y, Chui M, Ho SL, Cheung RT. Intracarotid abciximab injection to abort impending ischemic stroke during carotid angioplasty. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 11: 300–304.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hofmann R, Kerschner K, Steinwender C, Kypta A, Bibl D, Leisch F. Abciximab bolus injection does not reduce cerebral ischemic complications of elective carotid artery stenting: a randomized study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 725–727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wholey MH, Eles G, Toursakissian B, Bailey S, Jarmolowski C, Tan WA. Evaluation of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2003; 10: 33–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Lee KY, Heo JH, Lee SI, Yoon WB. Rescue treatment with abciximab in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2001; 56: 1585–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lee DH, Jo KD, Kim HG, Choi SJ, Jung SM, Ryu DS, Park MS. Local intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke with or without intravenous abciximab: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13: 769–773.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Qureshi AI, Suri FK, Khan J, Fessler RD, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Abciximab as an adjunct to high-risk carotid or vertebrobasilar angioplasty: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46: 1316–1325.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Rasmussen PA, Perl J. Stent-assisted angioplasty of intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis. An initial experience. J Neurosurg. 2000; 92: 771–778.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Bush RL, Lin PH, Bianco CC, Lawhorn TI, Hurt JE, Lumsden AB. Carotid artery stenting in a community setting: experience outside of a clinical trial. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003; 17: 629–634.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Morris DC, Silver B, Mitsias P, Lewandowski C, Patel S, Daley S, Zhang ZG, Lu M. Treatment of acute stroke with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and abciximab. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 1396–1399.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Eckert B, Koch C, Thomalla G, Roether J, Zeumer H. Acute basilar artery occlusion treated with combined intravenous abciximab and intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator: report of 3 cases. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1424–1427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. The Abciximab in Ischemic Stroke Investigators. Abciximab in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 601–609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bogousslavsky J, Leclerc JR. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2001; 57: S53–S57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bamford JM, Sandercock PAG, Warlow CP, Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989; 20: 828.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Brott T, Adams HP, Jr, Olinger CP, Adams HP Jr, Tomsick T, Barsan WG, Biller J, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Adams HP, Jr., Leclerc JR, Bluhmki E, Clarke W, Hansen MD, Hacke W. Measuring outcomes as a function of baseline severity of ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004; In press.
  35. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J. 1965; 14: 61–65.
  36. Adams HP, Jr., Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE3rd. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, Jaffe A, Ockene I, Schreiber TL, Bell WR, Knatterud G, Robertson TL, Terrin ML. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial—phase I: hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 11: 1–11.[Abstract]
  38. Dasgupta H, Blankenship JC, Wood GC, Frey CM, Demko SL, Menapace FJ. Thrombocytopenia complicating treatment with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors a pooled analysis. Am Heart J. 2000; 140: 206–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Sane DC, Damaraju LV, Topol EJ, Cabot CF, Mascelli MA, Harrington RA, Simoons ML, Califf RM. Occurrence and clinical significance of pseudothrombocytopenia during abciximab therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 75–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hass WK, Easton JD, Adams HP, Jr., Pryse-Phillips W, Molony BA, Anderson S, Kamm B. A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 501–507.[Abstract]
  41. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53: 457–481.[CrossRef]
  42. Agresti A. Anonymous Categorical Data Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
  43. Mantel N, Haenzel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22: 719–748.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Robins JM, Breslow N, Greenland S. Estimators of the Mantel-Haenzel Variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models. Biometrics. 1986; 42: 311–323.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, Pessin M, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark WM, Silver F, Rivera F. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2003–2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Clark WM, Albers GW, for the ATLANTIS Stroke Study Investigators. The ATLANTIS rt-PA (alteplase) Acute Stroke Trial. Final results. Stroke. 1999; 30: 234.
  47. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997; 28: 2109–2118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1265–1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
C. Patrono, C. Baigent, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Antiplatelet Drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 199S - 233S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
G. W. Albers, P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 630S - 669S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
R. W. Baumgartner, D. Georgiadis, K. Nedeltchev, G. Schroth, H. Sarikaya, and M. Arnold
Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection With Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e27 - e28.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
H. P. Adams Jr, M. B. Effron, J. Torner, A. Davalos, J. Frayne, P. Teal, J. Leclerc, B. Oemar, L. Padgett, E. S. Barnathan, et al.
Emergency Administration of Abciximab for Treatment of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of an International Phase III Trial: Abciximab in Emergency Treatment of Stroke Trial (AbESTT-II)
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 87 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
P. D. Schellinger, G. Thomalla, J. Fiehler, M. Kohrmann, C. A. Molina, T. Neumann-Haefelin, M. Ribo, O. C. Singer, O. Zaro-Weber, and J. Sobesky
MRI-Based and CT-Based Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke Within and Beyond Established Time Windows: An Analysis of 1210 Patients
Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2640 - 2645.