Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:1110-1112

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altaf, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altaf, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, W.

(Stroke. 2005;36:1110.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Microembolization During Carotid Endarterectomy and Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Nishath Altaf, MRCS (Ed)

Department of Vascular Surgery, and Department of Academic Radiology

Dorothee P. Auer, PhD

Department of Academic Radiology

John Gladman, MRCP

Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing

Shane T. MacSweeney, FRCS

Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

To the Editor:

We read with interest the recent article in Stroke by Wolf et al1 describing the relationship between transcranial detected microembolic signals (MES) and serial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the brain. The authors have studied 5 phases of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (dissection, clamping, shunting, de-clamping and wound closure). The authors observe microembolic signals detected during the dissection phase and de-clamping phase of CEA correlated significantly with the evolution of new DWI lesions and brain infarction on T1-weighted MRI. This study highlights the importance of good surgical technique especially in the dissection phase of the operation. However, MES detected in the dissection phase may be unavoidable because it also reflects the unstable carotid plaque,2 which even on minimal dissection may cause particulate embolization. It is of no surprise that no associations were found between DWI lesions and MES detected in de-clamping phase as microemboli in this phase of the operation tend to be gaseous in nature and therefore does not cause brain ischemia. In contrast, MES detected in the shunt phase tend to be a mix of particulate and gaseous microemboli and a nonsignificant correlation with DWI lesions in this study is consistent with previous studies.3

The wound closure phase of the operation tends to be short and gives us a glimpse of MES activity in the postoperative (or after restoration of blood flow) phase. MES detected in the postoperative and the recovery room period is particulate in nature and arises secondary to platelet aggregation and occasionally leads to thrombus formation on the denuded endarterectomized endothelium.4 Postoperative carotid thrombosis complicates 2% to 3% of CEAs and tends to occur within 4 to 6 hours of the operation. Patients who progress to this condition and subsequently brain ischemia have a 1- to 2-hour postoperative period of increased embolization.5 Approximately 12% of cases undergoing CEA are complicated by this postoperative MES and significant MES in this period is associated with ischemic changes on FLAIR brain images.6,7 Additionally, Payne et al8 have described that postoperative thromboembolism was significantly effected by a combination of antiplatelet agents acting on different pathways of coagulation.

Because Wolf et al1 only assessed MES in the short wound closure phase, the lack of association of MES with DWI lesions therefore does not allow to assess the contribution of the postoperative period to DWI evolution. It certainly would be of interest to elucidate the relationship of DWI lesion development and MES detected in longer postoperative periods, and to assess the efficacy of preoperative and postoperative pharmaceutical agents such as anticoagulants and dextran 40, respectively, in preventing subclinical and clinical brain ischemia detected by DWI.

References

  1. Wolf O, Heider P, Heinz M, Poppert H, Sander D, Greil O, Weiss W, Hanke M, Eckstein HH. Microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler sonography during carotid endarterectomy and correlation with serial diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2004; 35: e373–e375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gaunt ME, Brown L, Hartsthorne T, Bell PRF, Naylor AR. Unstable carotid plaques: preoperative identification and association with intraoperative embolization detected by transcranial Doppler. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996; 11: 78–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ackerstaff RGA, Jansen C, Moll FL, Vermeulen FEE, Hamerlijnck RPHM, Mauser HW. The signifance of microemboli detection by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21: 963–969.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Stratton JR, Zierler ZE, Kazmers A. Platelet deposition at carotid endarterectomy sites in humans. Stroke. 1997; 18: 722–727.
  5. Naylor AR. Regarding "High embolic rate early after carotid endarterectomy is associated with early cerebrovascular complications, especially in women." J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 408–409.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Levi CR, O’Malley HM, Fell G, Roberts AK, Hoare MC, Royle JP, Chan A, Bieles BC, Chambers BR, Bladin CF, Donnan GA. Transcranial Doppler detected cerebral microembolism following carotid endarterectomy. High microembolic signal loads predict postoperative cerebral ischaemia. Brain. 1997; 120: 621–629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cantelmo NL, Babikian VK, Samarweera RN, Gordon GK, Pochay VE, Winter MR. Cerebral microembolism and ischaemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 1024–1031.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Payne DA, Jones CI, Hayes P, Thompson MM, London NJ, Bell PR, Goodall AH, Naylor AR. Beneficial effects of clopidegrol combined with aspirin in reducing cerebral emboli in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1476–1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Response:

O. Wolf, MD; P. Heider, MD; M. Heinz, MD; M. Hanke, MD H.H. Eckstein, MD, PhD

Department of Vascular Surgery

H. Poppert, MD D. Sander, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology

O. Greil, MD W. Weiss, MD

Department of Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany

We appreciate the interest of Altaf et al in our work.4 As mentioned in our discussion, we confirm the statement of Altaf et al that microembolization during dissection is a function of plaque stability and good surgical technique with early clamping.

Because no reliable measurement of plaque stability exists up to now, other parameters like recent neurological symptoms were used as a kind of surrogate markers for stenosis activity and a significant correlation to the incidence of postoperative cerebral ischemia was found.5

We agree with the statement that microembolic signals (MES) during shunting are a mix of gaseous and particulate microemboli and that MES during de-clamping seem to be harmless gaseous emboli.

New advances in MES detection using multifrequency Doppler sonography may allow to discriminate the nature of microemboli during the different phases of the carotid endarterectomy in the future.1

We are aware of the results that evaluated microembolization in the early postoperative period.2,3

Screening only during the procedure and not the early postoperative period may underestimate the relationship between diffusion-weighted imaging lesions and MES. We decided not to analyze the early postoperative period because of the limited ability to differentiate real MES from artifacts during this phase.

Transcranial Doppler as a monitor procedure is only reliable when an exact positioning of the probes can be realized and maintained.

Even during CEA, when the patient is in optimal position and under general anesthesia, this can be really challenging.

During the early postoperative period when the patient recovers from anesthesia, it is difficult to get reliable MES data because continuous monitoring is often not possible because of movements of the patient.

If these difficulties can be resolved, the elucidation of the efficacy of postoperative pharmaceutical agents to prevent cerebral ischemia might be of great clinical value.

References

  1. Brucher R, Russell D. Automatic online embolus detection and artifact rejection with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1969–1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cantelmo NL, Babikian VL, Samaraweera RN, Gordon JK, Pochay VE, Winter MR. Cerebral microembolism and ischemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 1024–1031.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Levi CR, O’Malley HM, Fell G, Roberts AK, Hoare MC, Royle JP, Chan A, Beiles BC, Chambers BR, Bladin CF, Donnan GA. Transcranial Doppler detected cerebral microembolism following carotid endarterectomy. High microembolic signal loads predict postoperative cerebral ischaemia. Brain. 1997; 120 (Pt 4): 621–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wolf O, Heider P, Heinz M, Poppert H, Sander D, Greil O, Weiss W, Hanke M, Eckstein HH. Microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler sonography during carotid endarterectomy and correlation with serial diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2004; 35: e373–e375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wolf O, Heider P, Heinz M, Poppert H, Schmidt-Thieme T, Sander D, Grafin von Einsiedel H, Brandl R. Frequency, clinical significance and course of cerebral ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy evaluated by serial diffusion weighted imaging. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 27: 167–171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altaf, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altaf, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, W.