Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:1782-1789
Published online before print July 21, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000173405.02425.d6
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/8/1782    most recent
01.STR.0000173405.02425.d6v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cechetto, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cechetto, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2005;36:1782.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Interaction Between a Rat Model of Cerebral Ischemia and ß-Amyloid Toxicity

II. Effects of Triflusal

Shawn Whitehead, BSc; Guanliang Cheng, MD; Vladimir Hachinski, MD David F. Cechetto, PhD

From the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Correspondence to David F. Cechetto, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Sciences Building, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose— Clinical data suggest that Alzheimer disease (AD) and stroke together potentiate cognitive impairment. Our rat model demonstrates that this interaction may be mediated through inflammatory cells and pathways. Thus, anti-inflammatory agents such as Triflusal, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID), may provide neuroprotection for susceptible neurons in AD and cerebral ischemia.

Methods— AD was modeled by cerebroventricular injections of ß-amyloid (Aß25–35) and subcortical lacunar infarcts by striatal endothelin injections. Inflammatory mechanisms were examined by immunohistochemical analysis. Behavioral tasks were assessed with the Montoya staircase test.

Results— Triflusal reduced pathologic and inflammatory markers and functional deficits in rats receiving Aß or endothelin alone but was less effective in the more severe pathology of the combined Aß/endothelin model.

Conclusions— Higher doses or more prolonged treatment with NSAIDs may be required for more effective neuroprotection in combined AD and stroke conditions.


Key Words: amyloid • anti-inflammatory agents • astrocytes • cytokines • microglia


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical data indicate a link between cerebral ischemia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patients with autopsy evidence of AD pathology and lacunar infarcts in the striatum had more cognitive impairment than did patients with AD pathology alone,1,2 suggesting that dementia in AD patients may be worsened with cerebral ischemia.

Inflammatory responses common in both AD and cerebral ischemia include astrocytosis, microgliosis,3 and upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and nuclear factor (NF)-{kappa}B.4 Previously, rat models of cerebral ischemia or ß-amyloid (Aß) induced AD-like pathology and produced inflammatory responses.5 However, the combination of these 2 models elicited an even stronger inflammatory response.

Anti-inflammatory agents such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) may prove to be potential therapeutic agents in AD and cerebral ischemia and may be particularly effective in inhibiting the enhanced neuroinflammation and dementia when both AD and cerebral ischemia are present.

Triflusal (2-acetoxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid) is an antiplatelet agent structurally related to aspirin, with important differences in pharmacological, biochemical, and clinical aspects.6 Triflusal is rapidly transformed to its main metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid (HTB) after oral administration in humans.6 In major clinical trials, Triflusal has demonstrated efficacy similar to aspirin in the secondary prevention of ischemic episodes but with a markedly reduced risk of cerebral and systemic hemorrhage.7

Recently, it has been demonstrated that Triflusal and HTB are potent in vitro and in vivo inhibitors of the activation of NF-{kappa}B and NF-{kappa}B–regulated genes. Furthermore, orally administered Triflusal is neuroprotective and downregulates NF-{kappa}B, inflammatory mediators, and microglial activation in an excitotoxic (N-methyl-D-aspartate) injury model in the postnatal rat brain.8,9

A combined rat model of AD and cerebral ischemia describing exacerbated levels of inflammation and behavioral deficits has recently been established.5 The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of anti-inflammatory treatment on these models. To examine the therapeutic potential of Triflusal experimentally, AD pathology was generated with an intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of Aß(25–35), the toxic fragment of Aß, alone or in combination with striatal injections of the potent vasoconstrictor endothelin to mimic the subcortical lacunar infarcts seen clinically.10


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Surgery
All experimental procedures were carried out according to the animal care guidelines of the University of Western Ontario. Male Wistar rats (250 to 300 g) were divided into 4 groups: ICV injections of Aß(25–35) (Bachem); endothelin injections into the right striatum; both Aß and striatal endothelin injections; and sham procedures. The Aß(25–35) fragment was used to reduce the possibility of rapid coagulation and to allow diffusion of the peptide into the brain.

All rats were anesthetized with 40 mg/kg IP pentobarbital (Somnotol). Body temperature was maintained at 37°C. Aß(25–35) (50 nmol in 10 µL of saline) was injected bilaterally into the lateral ventricles. For details on Aß(25–35) composition, preparation, and administration see Sigurdsson et al10 and Whitehead et al.5 Two endothelin injections (6 pmol in 3 µL of saline), 1 mm apart, were made into the right striatum.5,11 Sham procedures involved all of the surgical steps without injections of Aß(25–35) or endothelin. After wound suturing, all rats received 40 mg/kg IM buprenorphine and were allowed to recover from surgery for 7 days.

Drug Administration
After surgery and recovery, mice received either oral administration of 30 mg/kg Triflusal or vehicle via oral gavage for 8 days (including the day of surgery). For details on vehicle and Triflusal preparation, see Bayon et al.12

Tissue Processing
Twenty-one days after surgery, all animals were humanely killed with a pentobarbital overdose and perfused transaortically, first with saline and then with 4% formaldehyde (pH 7.4). The brains were removed and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose for 36 hours at 4°C. Coronal sections (30 µm) were cut with a cryostat.

Immunohistochemistry
For detailed procedures, see Whitehead et al.5 Additionally, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 mouse monoclonal (1:1000, Fitzgerald Industries International) and cleaved Cas-3 rabbit polyclonal (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology,) primary antibodies were used.

Staircase Test
For a detailed protocol, see Whitehead et al5

Data Analysis
Digital photographs were taken with a light microscope (Leitz Diaplan). An investigator was blinded to the identification of the rat sections while analysis was being performed. All immunohistochemical data to be compared were processed at the same time with the same solutions to reduce any nonexperimental variation in intensity. A grading scale was based on both observable size and intensity of staining. Average optical densitometry measurements were calculated from 3 hippocampal sections. Measured areas were consistent between animals. Numbers of amyloid precursor protein (APP) accumulations were calculated in the cortex of each animal (average number of sections measured=20). Statistical analysis with ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test with a significance level of P<0.05 (n=4 for each group) was done for immunohistochemical data. Statistical analysis with Student’s t test was performed on the staircase test data with a significance level of P<0.05 (n=10 for each group).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
As previously demonstrated,5 endothelin induced increases in inflammatory, apoptotic, and AD-associated pathologic markers in the ipsilateral striatum and thalamus (Figure 1A, 1C, 1E, 1G, and 1I; TableDown). Triflusal treatment resulted in a strong reduction in APP (Figure 1B), Tau-2 (Figure 1D), OX-6 (Figure 1J), and COX-2 (TableDown) immunostaining; a mild reduction in NF-{kappa}B (p65) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} (Table 1Down) immunostaining; and no reduction in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining (Figure 1F).



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photomicrographs of APP-, ô-2–, GFAP-, and OX-6–immunostained coronal sections of the right striatum 21 days after 6 pmol injections of endothelin into the right striatum. Immunostaining of vehicle-treated rats is shown on the left and Triflusal-treated rats on the right. Bar indicates 100 µm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1A. Summary of Immunohistochemistry Staining and Quantification


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1B. Summary of Quantification

In the cortex, Aß(25–35) injections elicited increases in many proteins (TableUp), including cellular and accumulation-type (encompasses >1 cell and stains both intracellular and extracellular components) APP staining (Figure 2A), cellular Tau-2 (Figure 2C), and positive accumulation-type and cellular COX-2 (Figure 2E). Triflusal treatment greatly reduced APP (Figure 2B), Tau-2 (Figure 2D), and COX-2 (Figure 2F) immunostaining in the cortex. Triflusal also reduced OX-6, NF-{kappa}B (p65), and TNF-{alpha} immunostaining in the cortex (TableUp). Triflusal had no effect on GFAP-labeled astrocytes in the cortex (TableUp).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of APP-, Tau-2–, and COX-2–immunostained coronal sections of the cortex and APP-, NF-{kappa}B (p65)–, and GFAP-immunostained coronal sections of the corpus callosum 21 days after bilateral 50 nmol ICV injections of Aß(25–35). Immunostaining of vehicle-treated rats is shown on the left and Triflusal-treated rats on the right. Bar indicates 50 µm (for A, C, E, F, G, H, I) and 100 µm (for B, D, K, L).

Aß(25–35) injections resulted in increased immunostaining in the corpus callosum (TableUp), including somatic and axonal APP (Figure 2G) cellular NF-{kappa}B (p65) (Figure 2I), and GFAP-immunostained astrocytes (Figure 2K). Triflusal treatment resulted in a strong reduction in APP (Figure 2H), NF-{kappa}B (p65) (Figure 2I), GFAP-labeled astrocytes (Figure 2L), OX-6, COX-2, Tau-2, and TNF-{alpha} (TableUp) in the corpus callosum.

In the hippocampus, Aß(25–35) induced increases in Tau-2 immunostaining in the CA2/CA3 regions of the hippocampus (Figure 3A) and GFAP-labeled astrocytes in the CA1–CA3 regions (Figure 3C). Aß(25–35) increased OX-6–labeled microglia (Figure 3E) and TNF-{alpha} (Figure 3G) immunostaining in the thalamus. Triflusal treatment resulted in a reduction in Tau-2 (Figure 3B), OX-6, APP, NF-{kappa}B (p65), and COX-2 (TableUp), with no reduction of GFAP immunostaining in the hippocampus (Figure 3D). Triflusal reduced OX-6–labeled microglia (Figure 3F) and TNF-{alpha} immunostaining in the thalamus (Figure 3H) and reduced APP, NF-{kappa}B (p65), and TNF-{alpha} immunostaining in the hypothalamus (TableUp).



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Photomicrographs of Tau-2– and GFAP-immunostained coronal sections of the hippocampus and of OX-6– and TN-F{alpha}–immunostained coronal sections of the thalamus 21 days after bilateral 50 nmol/L ICV injections of Aß(25–35). Immunostaining of vehicle-treated rats is shown on the left and Triflusal-treated rats on the right. Bar indicates 50 µm (for A, B, E, F, G, H) and 100 µm (for C, D).

Combined Aß/endothelin administration resulted in large increases in inflammatory, apoptotic, and AD-related pathologic markers in numerous brain regions (Figure 4A, 4C, 4E, 4G, 4I, and 4K; TableUp). Triflusal treatment resulted in a reduction in Cas-3 immunostaining in the striatum, corresponding to the area of ischemic damage (Figure 4B), OX-6 immunostaining in the striatum posterior to the endothelin injection site (Figure 4F), and OX-6–labeled microglia in the corpus callosum posterior to the Aß injection site (Figure 4L).



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Photomicrographs of Cas-3– and OX-6–immunostained coronal sections of the right striatum; of GFAP-immunostained coronal sections of the hippocampus; and of OX-6–immunostained coronal sections of the corpus callosum 21 days after bilateral 50 nmol/L ICV injections of Aß(25–35). Immunostaining of vehicle-treated rats is shown on the left and Triflusal treated rats on the right. Bar indicates 50 µm (for C–F) and 100 µm (for A, B, G–L).

Some immunohistochemical results that were quantified by optical densitometry are shown in Table 1B, indicating that combined treatment elicits significant increases of immunostaining compared with Aß or endothelin alone. Triflusal significantly reduced select immunostaining in Aß- or endothelin-alone–treated rats but did not significantly decrease immunostaining in combination-treated rats, except for OX-6 in the right hippocampus.

Staircase Test
At the start of retesting, 7 days after surgery (day 8), Aß-treated rats that received vehicle showed a significant decrease in the number of food pellets eaten (–5.4±1.4) compared with day –1, which was prevented by Triflusal treatment (Figure 5). Combined Aß/endothelin-treated rats showed significant decreases in pellets eaten on days 8 through 12 compared with day –1, although this was not affected by treatment with Triflusal (Figure 5).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Line graphs of the results for the staircase test for sham-, endothelin-, Aß-, and Aß+endothelin-treated rats receiving vehicle or Triflusal (n=10 for each group). The training phase occurred on days –8 to –1. Surgery occurred on day 0, followed by 7 days of recovery (days 1–7). The posttreatment trials were performed on days 8 through 15. *Statistical significance, P<0.05 (n=10 for all groups).

Individual paw performance was calculated as a percent change. Endothelin-treated rats treated with vehicle had significant impairment in the left paw (contralateral to the stroke) on day, 8 (75±13% of the pretreatment average), 9, 11, and 15 but only on day 8 after treatment with Triflusal (Figure 6). Aß-treated rats that received vehicle showed a deficit in the right paw only on day 8 (67±10% of the pretreatment average), which was prevented by Triflusal. Combined Aß/endothelin-treated rats that received vehicle had deficits throughout the postsurgery testing period in both the left and right paws. With Triflusal treatment, the right and left paws recovered by days 9 and 12, respectively (Figure 6).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Bar graphs of the number of pellets eaten in the staircase test for each paw (n=10 for each group). The last 3 days of the training phase were averaged (days –3 though –1), and the results in the posttreatment testing were expressed as a percentage of the 3-day training phase average. *Statistical significance, P<0.05 (n=10 for all groups).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our results strongly suggest that the anti-inflammatory action of Triflusal is an effective mechanism of neuroprotection. Previous studies have shown that Triflusal treatment reduces NF-{kappa}B activation and glial reactivity, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase, COX-2, interleukin-1ß, and TNF-{alpha} expression, after an excitotoxic lesion in the postnatal rat brain.8,9

The focal-ischemia model with endothelin injections into the striatum was chosen to mimic the size and location of the multiple infarcts that are significantly correlated with increases in cognitive deficits in patients with evidence of Alzheimer-type lesions.1 As we have demonstrated here and previously,5,11 this model in the rat appears to be an effective way of creating ischemia with a relatively low level of inflammation, compared with the larger insults obtained with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Thus, this ischemic model, with relatively low levels of inflammation, allows for the assessment of its interaction with the inflammatory responses produced by Aß toxicity. Furthermore, the bilateral ICV injections of Aß(25–35) serve as an effective rat model to produce some of the pathologic and behavioral changes of AD.5,13,14

In the present investigation, bilateral ICV injections of Aß(25–35) and/or unilateral striatal injections of endothelin produced pathologic and behavioral results similar to those previously described.5 Rats receiving endothelin alone without any treatment had increases in inflammatory, apoptotic, and pathologic correlates of AD in the striatum. Aß-injected rats showed AD-like pathologic and inflammatory responses in several areas of the brain, including the cortex, corpus callosum, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus. In addition, as previously demonstrated,5 the combination of Aß and endothelin injections produced greater functional deficits and a greater inflammatory and pathological response, particularly in the hippocampus, than either Aß or endothelin alone.

Generally, Triflusal showed neuroprotective effects in rats receiving endothelin. Triflusal strongly reduced APP, Tau-2, and COX-2 immunostaining; and reduced the spread of immunostaining of OX-6–positive microglia to the posterior striatum. Previously, in vitro studies have shown that aspirin can protect neurons from hypoxia by mechanisms such as inhibition of the excitatory amino acid release, inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, or the delay of intracellular ATP loss.15–17 Furthermore, aspirin inhibits NF-{kappa}B translocation, and this is the mechanism by which aspirin is neuroprotective in vitro.18–20 Aspirin has also been shown to be neuroprotective in vivo in animal models of stroke.15–17 Triflusal appears to have a similar therapeutic potential as aspirin, but unlike aspirin, selectively inhibits COX-2. Our immunohistochemical results suggest that the anti-inflammatory action of Triflusal may be the mechanism of neuroprotection.

This is the first study examining the role of Triflusal as an anti-inflammatory agent in an experimental model of AD in the rat. Triflusal, in general, reduced levels of pathologic and inflammatory correlates of AD throughout the brain of rats receiving Aß(25–35) injections. The anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen has also been shown to decrease interleukin-1ß and GFAP-positive astrocytes in a mouse model of AD.21 Furthermore, epidemiologic studies have suggested that prophylactic treatment with anti-inflammatory agents decrease the risk of developing AD.22 Therefore, Triflusal may, by reducing the severity of inflammation caused by Aß toxicity in the rat, be beneficial in humans in reducing the risk of AD.

The combination of endothelin and Aß injections in the rat elicited enhanced pathologic and inflammatory responses. Although Triflusal was able to reduce some of the inflammatory signals, the degree of reduction was not as effective as seen in rats administered Aß or endothelin alone. It is possible that the neuroprotective action of Triflusal was unable to ameliorate the much greater inflammatory response attributable to the combination of Aß toxicity.

The functional data obtained with the Montoya staircase apparatus appear to support the changes observed with the pathologic and inflammatory markers. Aß injections, with and without endothelin, impaired performance after surgery. The increases in GFAP and OX-6 in the hippocampus after Aß administration may be correlated to the behavioral deficit. There was a greater degree of impairment in combined Aß/endothelin injections compared with Aß alone, and the duration of recovery was also longer. Furthermore, the combination of Aß/endothelin was also concomitant with greater increases in immunohistochemical pathologic markers in the hippocampus and cortex.

Treatment with Triflusal eliminated the behavioral deficit seen in rats receiving Aß alone. However, Triflusal treatment did affect the behavioral deficit of combined Aß/endothelin in rats. These behavioral results with Triflusal suggest that the pathologic response to the combination of Aß/endothelin was too great for the neuroprotective action of Triflusal and thus, was unable to rescue functional deficits seen in the staircase test.

As previously demonstrated,5 endothelin-treated rats have a prolonged deficit in the paw contralateral to the infarct, whereas the ipsilateral paw improves over time. With Triflusal treatment, there was only a transient 1-day impairment in the contralateral paw, with no significant difference between the 2 paws at the end of the retesting period, suggesting a positive functional outcome with drug treatment. Combined Aß/endothelin-treated rats had prolonged impairment in both paws that was not affected by treatment with Triflusal.

In summary, Triflusal inhibits inflammation induced by endothelin-derived cerebral ischemia in the rat. Both AD pathologic and inflammatory outcomes of Aß toxicity were also inhibited by Triflusal in the rat. Functional deficits, as measured by the staircase test, could be correlated to the changes seen in Aß- and endothelin-induced pathology and inflammation. The anti-inflammatory effects of Triflusal may account for observed behavioral improvement in the stroke or AD model but had no effect in the combined model.

Received April 22, 2005; accepted May 2, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Heyman A, Fillenbaum GG, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Gearing M, Mirra SS, Mohs RC, Peterson BL, Pieper CF. Cerebral infarcts in patients with autopsy-proven Alzheimer’s disease: CERAD, part XVIII: consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1998; 51: 159–162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease: the Nun Study. JAMA. 1997; 277: 813–817.[Abstract]
  3. McGeer PL, McGeer EG, Yasojima K. Alzheimer disease and neuroinflammation. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000; 59: 53–57.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Cechetto DF. Role of nuclear factor {kappa}B in neuropathological mechanisms. Prog Brain Res. 2001; 132: 391–404.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Whitehead SN, Hachinski VC, Cechetto DF. Interaction between a rat model of a toxicity and cerebral ischemia: I. inflammatory responses. Stroke. 2005; 36: 107–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McNeely W, Goa KL. Triflusal Drugs. 1998; 55: 823–833.
  7. Cruz-Fernandez JM, Lopez-Bescos L, Garcia-Dorado D, Lopez Garcia-Aranda V, Cabades A, Martin-Jadraque L, Velasco JA, Castro-Beiras A, Torres F, Marfil F, Navarro E. Randomized comparative trial of triflusal and aspirin following acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 457–465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Acarin L, Gonzalez B, Castellano B. Triflusal posttreatment inhibits glial nuclear factor-{kappa}B, downregulates the glial response, and is neuroprotective in an excitotoxic injury model in postnatal brain. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2394–2402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Acarin L, Gonzalez B, Castellano B. Oral administration of the anti-inflammatory substance triflusal results in the downregulation of constitutive transcription factor NF-{kappa}B in the postnatal rat brain. Neurosci Lett. 2000; 288: 4144.
  10. Sigurdsson EM, Lee JM, Dong XW, Hejna MJ, Lorens SA. Bilateral injections of amyloid-ß 25–35 into the amygdala of young Fischer rats: behavioral, neurochemical, and time dependent histopathological effects. Neurobiol Aging. 1997; 18: 591–608.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Gelb AW, Bayona NA, Wilson JX, Cechetto DF. Propofol anesthesia compared to awake reduces infarct size in rats. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96: 1183–1190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Bayon Y, Alonso A, Sanchez CM. 4-Trifluoromethyl derivatives of salicylate, triflusal and its main metabolite 2-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid, are potent inhibitors of nuclear factor {kappa}B activation. Br J Pharmacol. 1999; 126: 1359–1366.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, Cole GM, Cooper NR, Eikelenboom P, Emmerling M, Fiebich BL, Finch CE, Frautschy S, Griffin WS, Hampel H, Hull M, Landreth G, Lue L, Mrak R, Mackenzie IR, McGeer PL, O’Banion MK, Pachter J, Pasinetti G, Plata-Salaman C, Rogers J, Rydel R, Shen Y, Streit W, Strohmeyer R, Tooyoma I, Van Muiswinkel FL, Veerhuis R, Walker D, Webster S, Wegrzyniak B, Wenk G, Wyss-Coray T. Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000; 21: 383–421.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Frautschy SA, Hu W, Kim P, Miller SA, Chu T, Harris-White ME, Cole GM. Phenolic anti-inflammatory antioxidant reversal of Aß-induced cognitive deficits and neuropathology.
  15. De Cristobal J, Madrigal JL, Lizasoain I, Lorenzo P, Leza JC, Moro MA. Aspirin inhibits stress-induced increase in plasma glutamate, brain oxidative damage and ATP fall in rats. Neuroreport. 2002; 13: 217–221.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Khayyam N, Thavendiranathan P, Carmichael FJ, Kus B, Jay V, Burnham WM. Neuroprotective effects of acetylsalicylic acid in an animal model of focal brain ischemia. Neuroreport. 1999; 10: 371–374.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Overgaard K, Sereghy T, Pedersen H, Boysen G. Dose-response of rt-PA and its combination with aspirin in a rat embolic stroke model. Neuroreport. 1992; 3: 925–928.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Grilli M, Pizzi M, Memo M, Spano P. Neuroprotection by aspirin and sodium salicylate through blockade of NF-{kappa}B activation. Science. 1996; 274: 1383–1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kopp E, Ghosh S. Inhibition of NF-{kappa}B by sodium salicylate and aspirin. Science. 1994; 265: 956–959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Moro MA, De Alba J, Cardenas A, De Cristobal J, Leza JC, Lizasoain I, Diaz-Guerra MJ, Bosca L, Lorenzo P. Mechanisms of the neuroprotective effect of aspirin after oxygen and glucose deprivation in rat forebrain slices. Neuropharmacology. 2000; 39: 1309–1318.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lim GP, Yang F, Chu T, Chen P, Beech W, Teter B, Tran T, Ubeda O, Ashe KH, Frautschy SA, Cole GM. Ibuprofen suppresses plaque pathology and inflammation in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2000; 20: 5709–5714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. McGeer PL, McGeer EG. Inflammation, autotoxicity and Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2001; 22: 799–809.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. N. Whitehead, G. Cheng, V. C. Hachinski, and D. F. Cechetto
Progressive Increase in Infarct Size, Neuroinflammation, and Cognitive Deficits in the Presence of High Levels of Amyloid
Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3245 - 3250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/8/1782    most recent
01.STR.0000173405.02425.d6v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cechetto, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cechetto, D. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction