| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:2012.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Reports |
From the Department of Neurology, the Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Sarah Hospital, Brasilia DF Brazil.
Correspondence to Francisco Javier Carod-Artal, MD, PhD, Neurology Department, Sarah Hospital, SMHS Quadra 501 Conjunto A, CEP 7330-150, Brasilia DF, Brazil. E-mail javier{at}bsb.sarah.br
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Method A total of 130 consecutive young and 200 elderly stroke patients were studied.
Results Prevalence of thrombophilia was, respectively: protein S deficiency (11.5% versus 5.5%), protein C deficiency (0.76% versus 1%), resistance to activated protein C (2.3% versus 3.5%), mutation in V Leiden factor (1.5% versus 2%), antithrombin III deficiency (0% versus 0%), lupus anticoagulant (0% versus 0.5%), anticardiolipin antibodies (3% versus 10%; P=0.01), hyperhomocysteinemia (31.5% versus 53.5%; P=0.0001), mutation of the MTHFR gene in homocigosis (10% versus 5%), and heterocigosis (27.6% versus 41.9%; P=0.01).
Conclusion Prothrombotic conditions were more frequent in stroke of undetermined cause.
Key Words: epidemiology stroke thrombophilia thrombosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of vascular risk factors and ischemic stroke subtypes in young and elderly stroke patients and analyze the prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with ischemic stroke in a stroke reference Brazilian hospital.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data were collected on vascular risk factors and diagnostic stroke subtypes. All patients underwent a diagnostic protocol for ischemic stroke, including ECG, chest x-ray films, carotid echo-Doppler (100%), transthoracic (100%) or transesophagical echocardiogram (64% of young versus 31% of elderly), computed tomography scan, and thrombophilia studies. Brain MRI was performed when necessary in 94 young (magnetic resonance angiography in 46.6%) and 44 elderly patients. Thrombophilia studies included fasting plasma levels of protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, levels of homocysteine, resistance to activated protein C (APC), IgG anticardiolipin (ACL) antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant (LA). Genetic tests for the V Leiden factor and C677T methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutations (MTHFR) were obtained in all subjects. Additional biochemical studies included serology for syphilis (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory), Chagas disease, and antinuclear antibodies in all patients.
Screening of thrombophilia was done at
3 months after the acute stroke event to exclude an acute-phase response. Repeated testing during the convalescent state was performed when an abnormal result was observed. The diagnosis of any anticoagulant deficiency was based on established in-house laboratory reference ranges for protein C (70% to 130%), protein S (65% to 130%), antithrombin III (80% to 120%), LA (33% to 42%), ACL antibodies (positive IgG >10 IgG phospholipid units/mL; positive IgM >10 IgM phospholipid units/mL). Homocysteinemia was diagnosed when the mean of its serum level was >13 µmol/L.
Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Treatment (TOAST) criteria were used to define stroke subtype. We included patients with positive markers of thrombophilia without other known causes of stroke in the group of stroke of undetermined cause. Risk factor comparison for young and elderly subjects was performed using t tests for continuous variables and
2 test and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. A 2-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
45 years of age; 72.2% of young stroke patients (130) had an ischemic infarction and were included in this study. Demographic and vascular risk factors of the study population are shown in Table 1; thrombophilia studies appear in Table 2. Protein S deficiency was the most prevalent thrombophilic condition in young patients. Prothrombotic conditions were more prevalent in stroke of undetermined cause (P<0.001).
|
|
We analyzed the overall thrombophilia states (any combination of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin III deficiencies, resistance to APC, positive LA, or a mutation in the factor V of Leiden). Twenty-one young (16.1%) and 26 elderly (13%) patients had potential thrombophilic states (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; CI, 0.4 to 1.51; P=0.423). When this subgroup was analyzed, 15 young (16.7%) and 6 elderly stroke patients (9.4%) with stroke of undetermined origin had a thrombophilia (OR, 0.7; CI, 0.24 to 1.97; P=0.456).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study revealed a high prevalence of cryptogenic stroke in young stroke patients and no association between inherited thrombophilias and any of the pathogenic subtypes of ischemic stroke in old stroke patients. Only protein S deficiency was associated with stroke of undetermined cause in young patients. Proportions of protein S deficiency were clearly higher than those reported by the South London Ethnicity and Stroke Study.5 We thought that a mixed ethnicity with influence of black Africans in Brazil might result in the reported high incidence of protein S deficiency.
Thrombophilia may be a risk factor for cardioembolism.4 However, we observed a higher proportion of thrombophilia among young patients with stroke of undetermined cause rather than those with cardioembolism. Further research should focus on the possible role of acquired thrombophilias (LA, ACL antibodies) in the pathogenesis of specific etiological subtypes of ischemic stroke (embolism from or via the heart, small vessel disease) in the young.
The strength of our study is that we prospectively evaluated a cohort of 330 ischemic stroke patients. However, the potential occurrence of a selection bias can never be entirely ruled out because this epidemiological study was done in a stroke reference hospital. Several thrombophilic states were more common among the elderly: ACL antibodies and hyperhomocysteinemia. Levels of homocysteine and ACL antibodies may increase with age. In conclusion, although distributions of stroke subtype and of conventional risk factors were different between young and elderly subjects, thrombophilic states did not clearly differ and could not explain those differences.
Received April 22, 2005; revision received June 17, 2005; accepted June 21, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Marini C, Totaro R, Carolei A; for the National Research Council Study Group in the Young. Long-term prognosis of cerebral ischemia in young adults. Stroke. 1999; 30: 23202325.
3. Jacobs BS, Boden-Albala B, Lin IF, Sacco RL. Stroke in the young in the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 27892793.
4. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW, van Bockxmeer FM, Lofthouse E, Staples N, Baker RI. Inherited thrombophilia in ischemic stroke and its pathogenic subtypes. Stroke. 2001; 32: 17931799.
5. Jerrard-Dunne P, Evans A, McGovern R, Hajat C, Kalra L, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD, Markus HS. Ethnic differences in markers of thrombophilia: implications for the investigation of ischemic stroke in multiethnic populations: the South London Ethnicity and Stroke Study. Stroke. 2003; 34: 18211826.
6. Bushnell CD, Goldstein LB. Diagnostic testing for coagulopathies in patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31: 30673078.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |