Published online before print September 7, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000240495.99425.0f
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:2546.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Early Coronary Revascularization Diminishes the Risk of Ischemic Stroke With Acute Myocardial Infarction
From the Nebraska Heart Institute (E.V.), Omaha, Neb; Brooke Army Medical Center (E.A.S.), San Antonio, Texas; Ovation Research Group (P.D.F., D.J.P.), Highland Park, Ill; Genentech, Inc (M.B.), South San Francisco, Calif; and the University of Kentucky (M.D., P.D.), Lexington, Ky.
Correspondence to Steven R. Steinhubl, MD, 900 S. Limestone St., 326 C. T. Wethington Bldg., Lexington, KY 40536. E-mail steinhubl{at}uky.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background and Purpose— Ischemic stroke is an uncommon but devastating complication of myocardial infarction (MI). It is possible that delay in the acute revascularization of these patients influences the risk of peri-MI ischemic stroke independent of size of infarction or residual ventricular function. The influence of the timing and type of revascularization on risk of ischemic stroke in the patient with MI has not previously been assessed.
Methods— We used the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3 and 4 databases to identify 45 997 subjects who received thrombolytic therapy and 47 876 patients who were treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for MI. In-hospital ischemic stroke occurred in 248 (0.54%) and 150 (0.31%) patients in the two groups, respectively. Patients were stratified based on time from presentation to initial therapy.
Results— A statistically significant linear relationship between time to revascularization therapy and risk of in-hospital ischemic stroke was seen on univariate analysis. A multivariate model incorporating 26 other variables showed thrombolytic therapy within 15 minutes was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36–0.94). Primary angioplasty within 90 minutes of arrival was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward lower stroke risk (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41–1.12). Interestingly, his benefit of early reperfusion therapy did not appear to be related to improvements in left ventricular function.
Conclusion— Risk of in-hospital ischemic stroke with MI is closely tied to the time to revascularization with both thrombolytic and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty therapies. Early revascularization is independently predictive of a lower risk of ischemic stroke, but the mechanism of this does not appear to be related to improved cardiac function. The records of 45 997 subjects who received thrombolytic therapy and 47 876 patients who were treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for myocardial infarction were analyzed to determine the relationship between time to revascularization and the occurrence of ischemic stroke. A statistically significant linear relationship between time to revascularization therapy and risk of in-hospital ischemic stroke was seen on univariate analysis. A multivariate model incorporating 26 other variables showed thrombolytic therapy within 15 minutes of presentation was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke, and angioplasty within 90 minutes was similarly associated with a nonsignificant trend toward lower stroke risk.
Key Words: angioplasty • myocardial infarction • stroke • thrombolysis
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Ischemic stroke is an uncommon but devastating complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI). In older series, the risk of thrombotic stroke was as high as 3.7%,1,2 but this has diminished in recent years, possibly related to improved reperfusion or more aggressive periinfarction antithrombotic therapy. In the GUSTO-I population, 0.6% of patients experienced ischemic stroke during hospitalization and of these, 17% died.3,4
Previous studies have found that risk factors for ischemic stroke associated with MI include large, akinetic segments of myocardium5 and the presence of left ventricular thrombus6 plus other concomitant states that predispose to stroke such as atrial fibrillation, advanced age, history of cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In addition to these established risk factors, there are also several plausible mechanisms that may contribute to ischemic stroke after an MI. During an acute MI, there is increased activity of the coagulation cascade that may last up to at least 6 months after the event.7 In addition, there is enhanced catecholamine surge that may also lead to enhanced platelet aggregation and activation on top of diffuse vasospasm from released catecholamines. Thus, this state of hypercoagulability after an MI may lead to increased thrombosis and subsequent thromboembolic events, including stroke. Emboli may come from aorta or carotid arteries or even from the left atrium or left ventricle. There is also release of inflammatory cytokines in the vasculature after an MI.8,9 The circulatory inflammatory cytokines10 may then incite a cascade of events in the cerebral circulation leading to plaque rupture and thrombogenesis with resultant thromboembolic events. As evidence of this, complex and presumably unstable carotid plaques are found to be common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (42% with unstable angina versus 8% with stable angina, P=0.002).11
It is unknown whether the timing of revascularization, with thrombolytic therapy or angioplasty, results in a lower risk of ischemic stroke in the weeks immediately after MI. It is conceivable that early interruption of myocardial injury may attenuate thromboembolic stroke risk as a result of improved myocardial salvage and a subsequent decrease in akinetic wall segments leading to a lower likelihood of ventricular thrombus formation. Additionally, infarction itself may increase the risk of ischemic stroke independent of the ultimate postinfarct architecture and function of the left ventricle such as through endocardial inflammation. We sought to investigate the link between the duration of ischemia in patients with MI and the risk of ischemic stroke while attempting to control for the extent of MI-related myocardial damage.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 3 and 4 registries are prospective, observational databases of patients with acute MI; the registry’s data collection process has been described elsewhere.12 Briefly, the NRMI database is a registry that primarily collects detailed information regarding the immediate cardiac care of patients presenting to the hospital with acute MI. Multiple data points are collected during each patient’s hospitalization, but because this is an inpatient registry, information relating to posthospital care and outcomes is not available. Stroke is defined by NRMI as "hemorrhagic," "nonhemorrhagic," or "unknown." Clinical testing that allows for the diagnosis of stroke type (eg CT, etc) is not recorded. The patients included in this study were admitted to one of 1607 participating hospitals between April 1, 1998, and January 31, 2002. Hospitals that participated in the registry enrolled all consecutive patients with MI, resulting in a total of 838 267 participants. Patients transferred into or out of a NRMI-participating center were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had a stroke event that occurred before arrival, were missing stroke information, had a stroke classified as hemorrhagic or unknown, or were missing electrocardiographic information. After implementing exclusionary criteria, the final patient count was 455 502 patients enrolled from 1607 hospitals. In this group, 45 997 patients were treated with thrombolytic therapy and 47 876 patients underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patient characteristics reported in the registry included detailed demographic data, medical history, medical therapies, and in-hospital events. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction in NRMI 3 was based on at least one of the following findings: creatine kinase or creatine kinase-MB greater than or equal to twice the upper limit of normal, electrocardiographic evidence of Q wave MI, scintigraphic or autopsy evidence of myocardial infarction, or a discharge diagnosis of MI by the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (code 410.X1). In addition to the clinical findings, a discharge diagnosis of acute MI was required in NRMI 4. Data on stroke were collected on each patient. This study included only patients with ischemic stroke and excluded cases of hemorrhagic stroke, thrombotic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion, and stroke not otherwise defined.
Patients that underwent primary revascularization (thrombolytic or PTCA) were divided into groups based on the time from presentation to the initiation of reperfusion therapy. For thrombolytic therapy, four categories were prospectively defined: 0 to 15 minutes, 16 to 30 minutes, 31 to 45 minutes, and >45 minutes. For primary PTCA, three categories were prospectively defined: 0 to 90 minutes, 91 to 120 minutes, and >120 minutes. These intervals were determined before data analysis and remained unaltered. The primary end point of this evaluation was ischemic stroke.
Data Analysis
Univariate analysis was applied to assess differences in baseline characteristics across the individual categories relating to time to reperfusion. Differences in selected discrete variables were analyzed using 
2 tests. A one-way analysis of variance and the nonparametric Brown-Mood median test were used for evaluation of continuous variables. A P value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance.
The adjusted effect estimate of time-to-reperfusion on the occurrence of ischemic stroke was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. Included as covariates were factors found to be significant predictors of ischemic stroke in a univariate analysis of the entire population (see Table 1). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs for OR are included for each variable. Data on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) were available in only 76.9% of patients with stroke. Subjects without EF assessment were excluded from the univariate and multivariate evaluations. Analysis was performed using SAS Version 8 (SAS Institute, Inc).
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In the group evaluated, 93 873 patients with MI underwent urgent revascularization with thrombolytic therapy (45 997) or PTCA (47 876). Ischemic stroke occurred during hospitalization in a total of 398 patients (0.42%): 248 patients (0.54%) who received thrombolytic therapy and in 150 patients (0.31%) who underwent PTCA. The characteristics of these patients are presented in Tables 1 and 2
and are well matched within all time divisions with the exceptions noted. Atrial fibrillation was present more frequently in the patients in whom primary revascularization was initiated later, although this difference was statistically significant only among those treated with PTCA.
|
Increase delay in revascularization was associated with an increasing incidence of ischemic stroke in both thrombolytic and angioplasty-treated patients (Figure 1). Patients who underwent revascularization with minimal delay had a significantly lower risk of stroke than those who received therapy later. This relationship remained statistically significant for all time divisions.
|
By multivariate analysis, thrombolytic therapy within 15 minutes of arrival in the emergency department was associated with in an improvement in ischemic stroke risk compared with the group receiving therapy after 45 minutes (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88) (Figure 2). Similar therapy delivered 16 to 45 minutes into hospitalization resulted in a nonsignificant, linear trend toward diminished thrombotic stroke risk when compared with thrombolytic therapy after 45 minutes. In the subset of patients undergoing primary PTCA, the risk of stroke rose linearly as the time from presentation to first balloon inflation increased, but this trend was not statistically significant between the time interval groups in the multivariate analysis.
|
To determine whether the relationship between early revascularization and decrease ischemic stroke risk was associated with improved left ventricular function, several markers of infarct size were included in the multivariate analysis: the number of electrocardiographic leads with ST-segment elevation; the presence of congestive heart failure or cardiogenic shock during hospitalization; and left ventricular EF at discharge. Inclusion of these confounders did not alter the favorable relationship between early revascularization and diminished stroke risk.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The pathophysiology that leads to ischemic stroke in the weeks after MI is likely multifactorial. Certainly, other pathologic states are frequently present in the MI population that predispose patients to cerebrovascular thrombotic events such as atrial fibrillation, history of cerebrovascular disease, and the hematologic and mechanical perturbations that accompany coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In the absence of these clear risk factors, the relationship between acute MI and subsequent development of ischemic stroke is somewhat elusive. The traditional explanation for this association implicates the role of an akinetic segment of left ventricular myocardium that predisposes to mural thrombus and subsequent embolism to the cerebral circulation. This progression of events is supported mainly by the findings of smaller trials showing that the presence of ventricular mural thrombus is a marker for an increased risk of ischemic stroke6,13 along with studies that strengthen the association between low EF and stroke in the chronic phase.5,14 Anticoagulation after MI reduces the chance of ischemic stroke,1,3,15,16 but it is not known if this intervention decreases stroke rate solely by diminishing the likelihood of the formation of mural thrombus or by limiting its embolic potential.
Our data suggest that the risk of thromboembolic stroke increases linearly with prolonged myocardial ischemia and that this risk seems to persist regardless of the extent of myocardial damage. Early revascularization, whether by thrombolytic therapy or PTCA, confers protection against the development of ischemic stroke during the index hospitalization. The relationship between delay in revascularization and ischemic stroke appears to be independent of size of infarction, the presence or absence of shock or congestive heart failure, and EF seen at time of discharge and therefore invokes the possibility of a mechanism for stroke risk that does not depend on ventricular structure. We note that an infarction of the inferior wall of the ventricle was far more common in the 0- to 15-minute thrombolytic group, but this factor was considered in the multivariate analysis and seemed to not affect the predictive power of early thrombolytic therapy on stroke risk.
The earliest therapy with a thrombolytic agent appears to confer the greatest relative advantage in stroke prevention. This is likely the result of the very rapid reperfusion attendant with aggressive thrombolytic therapy and is not related to any direct effect of the drug on inhibition of cerebral thromboembolism. If the latter were true, we would observe a lower stroke rate among patients receiving thrombolytic therapy across all intervals of time to treatment (Figure 1).
Myocardial infarction is known to accompany a diffuse hematologic milieu of enhanced thrombosis and amplified inflammatory mediators. It is conceivable that ischemia itself induces a systemic procoagulant effect, thereby facilitating thrombus formation and embolization from the aorta or carotid arteries, or even from the left ventricle (irrespective of the degree of sustained wall motion abnormality). In patients with acute coronary syndromes—but not in patients with stable coronary disease—markers of a hypercoagulable state such as prothrombin fragment 1+2 and fibrinopeptide A7 become elevated and remain so for months.
Alternatively, ischemia may provoke the release of inflammatory cytokines that trigger the destabilization and rupture of plaques in the remote cerebral circulation. Even short periods of ischemia are adequate to stimulate the activation of neutrophils17 and the synthesis of acute phase reactants.10 In unstable angina, the presence of diffuse inflammation of the coronary vasculature has been suggested by the finding of diminished neutrophil myeloperoxidase in serum samples extracted remote to the affected coronary segment.8 Acute mediators of inflammation may serve as both markers of plaque instability and propagators of it. C-reactive protein has been shown to exhibit both a procoagulant effect—by stimulating PAI-118 and tissue factor19 expression—and a direct proinflammatory effect.20 Serum C-reactive protein levels rise in response to myocardial injury21 to a degree that is attenuated by early patency of the infarct related artery.22 Direct evidence that hematologic factors stimulated by ischemia or injury have a direct bearing on endovascular structure is suggested by the finding of diffuse plaque instability in remote coronary segments of patients with acute MI23 and the presence of multiple fissured, complex plaques in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.24–26 Consideration should be given to the possibility that enhanced thrombotic tendency or diffuse intravascular inflammation contribute to thrombus formation inside or outside the ventricular cavity with subsequent cerebral embolization or rupture of a vulnerable plaque in the remote cerebral circulation and that these dynamic factors are potentiated by progressively longer periods of myocardial ischemia.
Limitations
Despite the large number of patients in the NRMI databases, the absolute number of patients in this analysis who underwent primary revascularization and subsequently suffered ischemic stroke is relatively small with a combined total of only 398. Further subdivision into intervals of treatment delay results in the small sample sizes noted in this analysis and constitutes the chief weakness of this study.
We used surrogate features—such as the degree of ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram, the presence of shock, and the ventricular EF on hospital discharge—to estimate the extent of myocardial injury. A more ideal measure would be the absolute value of cardiac-specific enzyme elevation, but this information was not available as part of the NRMI databases we queried. However, a close correlation has been shown to exist between the number of leads exhibiting ST-segment elevation and total serum creatine kinase in acute MI.27
The NRMI databases provide only limited information regarding our main end point: stroke. We are unable to elucidate how the diagnosis was made in each instance (clinically, CT, other imaging, etc), the location and extent of the stroke, and what type of therapies were used in response to the cerebral event. Finally, the NRMI databases tracks the hospital phase of care only. The details of long-term, out-of-hospital events and treatments are not available.
Conclusion
The risk of ischemic stroke with acute MI appears to be at least partly related to the time from initial presentation to primary revascularization therapy both in patients undergoing PTCA and in those receiving thrombolytic therapy. Early thrombolytic therapy is strongly independently predictive of a lower risk of ischemic stroke regardless of the ultimate degree of ventricular myocardial preservation.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Research supported by Ovation Research Group and Genentech Corporation. The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction is sponsored by Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, Calif).
Disclosures
None.
Received May 28, 2006; accepted June 13, 2006.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Bodenheimer MM, Sauer D, Shareef B, Brown MW, Fleiss JL, Moss AJ. Relation between myocardial infarct location and stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 61–66.[Abstract]
2. Mooe T, Eriksson P, Stegmayr B. Ischemic stroke after acute myocardial infarction. A population-based study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 762–767.
3. Vaitkus PT, Berlin JA, Schwartz JS, Barnathan ES. Stroke complicating acute myocardial infarction. A meta-analysis of risk modification by anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1992; 152: 2020–2024.
4. Mahaffey KW, Granger CB, Sloan MA, Thompson TD, Gore JM, Weaver WD, White HD, Simoons ML, Barbash GI, Topol EJ, Califf RM. Risk factors for in-hospital nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis: results from GUSTO-I. Circulation. 1998; 97: 757–764.
5. Loh E, Sutton MS, Wun CC, Rouleau JL, Flaker GC, Gottlieb SS, Lamas GA, Moye LA, Goldhaber SZ, Pfeffer MA. Ventricular dysfunction and the risk of stroke after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 251–257.
6. Vaitkus PT, Barnathan ES. Embolic potential, prevention and management of mural thrombus complicating anterior myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1004–1009.[Abstract]
7. Merlini PA, Bauer KA, Oltrona L, Ardissino D, Cattaneo M, Belli C, Mannucci PM, Rosenberg RD. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994; 90: 61–68.
8. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, D’Onofrio G, Crea F, Maseri A. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 5–12.
9. Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, Fratoni S, Palmieri G, Bonanno E, Anemona L, Schwartz RS, Spagnoli LG. Diffuse and active inflammation occurs in both vulnerable and stable plaques of the entire coronary tree: a histopathologic study of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1585–1593.
10. Neumann FJ, Ott I, Gawaz M, Richardt G, Holzapfel H, Jochum M, Schomig A. Cardiac release of cytokines and inflammatory response in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995; 92: 748–755.
11. Lombardo A, Biasucci LM, Lanza GA, Coli S, Silvestri P, Cianflone D, Liuzzo G, Burzotta F, Crea F, Maseri A. Inflammation as a possible link between coronary and carotid plaque instability. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3158–3163.
12. Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, French WJ, Gore JM, Lambrew CT, Rubison RM, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Weaver WD. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 1994; 90: 2103–2114.
13. Greaves SC, Zhi G, Lee RT, Solomon SD, MacFadyen J, Rapaport E, Menapace FJ, Rouleau JL, Pfeffer MA. Incidence and natural history of left ventricular thrombus following anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 442–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Komrad MS, Coffey CE, Coffey KS, McKinnis R, Massey EW, Califf RM. Myocardial infarction and stroke. Neurology. 1984; 34: 1403–1409.
15. Anand SS, Yusuf S. Oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2058–2067.
16. Anticoagulants in acute myocardial infarction. Results of a cooperative clinical trial. JAMA. 1973; 225: 724–729.
17. Jordan JE, Zhao ZQ, Vinten-Johansen J. The role of neutrophils in myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 43: 860–878.
18. Devaraj S, Xu DY, Jialal I. C-reactive protein increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and activity in human aortic endothelial cells: implications for the metabolic syndrome and atherothrombosis. Circulation. 2003; 107: 398–404.
19. Cermak J, Key NS, Bach RR, Ball J, Jacob HS, Vercellotti GM. C-reactive protein induces human peripheral blood monocytes to synthesize tissue factor. Blood. 1993; 82: 513–520.
20. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2165–2168.
21. de Beer FC, Hind CR, Fox KM, Allan RM, Maseri A, Pepys MB. Measurement of serum C-reactive protein concentration in myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Br Heart J. 1982; 47: 239–243.
22. Pietila K, Harmoinen A, Hermens W, Simoons ML, Van de Werf F, Verstraete M. Serum C-reactive protein and infarct size in myocardial infarct patients with a closed versus an open infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 915–919.
23. Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, Pica M, Shoukfeh M, O’Neill WW. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 915–922.
24. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation. 1995; 92: 657–671.
25. Davies MJ, Thomas A. Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310: 1137–1140.[Abstract]
26. Rioufol G, Finet G, Ginon I, Andre-Fouet X, Rossi R, Vialle E, Desjoyaux E, Convert G, Huret JF, Tabib A. Multiple atherosclerotic plaque rupture in acute coronary syndrome: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2002; 106: 804–808.
27. Inoue M, Hori M, Fukunami M, Fukushima M, Tada M, Abe H, Minamino T, Fukui S. Evaluation of precordial ST segment mapping as an index of infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1979; 42: 726–733.
Related Article:
Stroke 2006 37: 2449-2450.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. I. Suarez Acute Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Stroke, Sympathetic Stress, and Inflammation: Birds of a Feather Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2449 - 2450. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||